Membrane-mediated interactions – a physico-chemical basis for protein sorting

Abstract

Sorting of membrane proteins in eukaryotic cells is a complex yet vital task that involves several 10,000 molecular players. Sorting takes place not only along the early secretory pathway, i.e., between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus, but also between other organelles, including exchange with the cell's plasma membrane. Traditionally, specific binary interactions between proteins have been made responsible for most of the protein sorting. A more active role of lipids, however, became visible in recent years. Not only do lipids in complex membranes show domain formation that may support/suppress sorting events, but also collective, membrane-mediated interactions have emerged as a robust physico-chemical mechanism to drive protein sorting. Here, we will review recent insights into these aspects.     

Protein sorting and membrane-mediated interactions

Sorting of membrane proteins is of vital importance for living cells. Indeed, roughly one-third of a eukaryotic cell’s proteome consists of peripheral and transmembrane proteins. These need to be properly distributed and dynamically maintained at distinct locations in the compartmentalized cell, and one may wonder how proteins determine where, when, and how to travel to reach a specific organelle. While specific binary interactions between proteins have been invoked in explaining the trafficking and sorting processes, a more active role of lipids in this context has become visible in recent years. In particular, membrane-mediated interactions have been suggested to serve as a robust physicochemical mechanism to facilitate protein sorting. Here, we will review some recent insights into these aspects.     

Artificial ubiquitylation is sufficient for sorting of a plasma membrane ATPase to the vacuolar lumen of Arabidopsis cells

Sorting of transmembrane proteins into the inner vesicles of multivesicular bodies for subsequent delivery to the vacuole/lysosome can be induced by attachment of a single ubiquitin or K63-linked ubiquitin chains to the cytosolic portion of the cargo in yeast and mammals. In plants, large efforts have been undertaken to elucidate the mechanisms of vacuolar trafficking of soluble proteins. Sorting of transmembrane proteins, by contrast, is still largely unexplored. As a proof of principle, that ubiquitin is involved in vacuolar sorting in plants we show that a translational fusion of a single ubiquitin to the Arabidopsis plasma membrane ATPase PMA-EGFP is sufficient to induce its endocytosis and sorting into the vacuolar lumen. Sorting of the artificial reporter is not dependent on ubiquitin chain formation, but involves ubiquitin's hydrophobic patch and can be inhibited by coexpression of a dominant-negative version of the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) related protein AtSKD1 (SUPPRESSOR OF K+ TRANSPORT GROWTH DEFECT1). Our results suggest that ubiquitin can in principle act as vacuolar sorting signal in plants.     

Conserved lipid-binding sites in membrane proteins: a focus on cytochrome c oxidase

Specific interactions between lipids and membrane proteins have been observed in recent high-resolution crystal structures of membrane proteins. A number of cytochrome oxidase structures were analyzed, along with many amino acid sequences of membrane-spanning regions aligned according to their location in the membrane. The results reveal conservation of lipid-binding sites and of the residues that form them. These studies imply that bound lipids have important roles that are crucial to the assembly, structure, or activity of the protein. Evidence for some of these roles in subunit interactions, membrane insertion, and protein-protein complex formation is reviewed.     

Role of membrane organization and membrane domains in endocytic lipid trafficking

Lipid compositions vary greatly among organelles, and specific sorting mechanisms are required to establish and maintain these distinct compositions. In this review, we discuss how the biophysical properties of the membrane bilayer and the chemistry of individual lipid molecules play a role in the intracellular trafficking of the lipids themselves, as well as influencing the trafficking of transmembrane proteins. The large diversity of lipid head groups and acyl chains lead to a variety of weak interactions, such as ionic and hydrogen bonding at the lipid/water interfacial region, hydrophobic interactions, and van-der-Waals interactions based on packing density. In simple model bilayers, these weak interactions can lead to large-scale phase separations, but in more complex mixtures, which mimic cell membranes, such phase separations are not observed. Nevertheless, there is growing evidence that domains (i.e., localized regions with non-random lipid compositions) exist in biological membranes, and it is likely that the formation of these domains are based on interactions similar to those that lead to phase separations in model systems. Sorting of lipids appears to be based in part on the inclusion or exclusion of certain types of lipids in vesicles or tubules as they bud from membrane organelles.     

Lipid cosorting mediated by shiga toxin induced tubulation

To maintain cell membrane homeostasis, lipids must be dynamically redistributed during the formation of transport intermediates, but the mechanisms driving lipid sorting are not yet fully understood. Lowering sphingolipid concentration can reduce the bending energy of a membrane, and this effect could account for sphingolipid depletion along the retrograde pathway. However, sphingolipids and cholesterol are enriched along the anterograde pathway, implying that other lipid sorting mechanisms, such as protein-mediated sorting, can dominate. To characterize the influence of protein binding on the lipid composition of highly curved membranes, we studied the interactions of the B-subunit of Shiga toxin (STxB) with giant unilamellar vesicles containing its glycosphingolipid receptor [globotriaosylceramide (Gb3)]. STxB binding induced the formation of tubular membrane invaginations, and fluorescence microscopy images of these highly curved membranes were consistent with co-enrichment of Gb3 and sphingolipids. In agreement with theory, sorting was stronger for membrane compositions close to demixing. These results strongly support the hypothesis that proteins can indirectly mediate the sorting of lipids into highly curved transport intermediates via interactions between lipids and the membrane receptor of the protein.     

Biomimetic membrane systems to study cellular organization

During many cellular processes such as cell division, polarization and motility, the plasma membrane does not only represent a passive physical barrier, but also provides a highly dynamic platform for the interplay between lipids, membrane binding proteins and cytoskeletal elements. Even though many regulators of these interactions are known, their mutual interdependence appears to be highly complex and difficult to study in a living cell. Over the past few years, in vitro studies on membrane–cytoskeleton interactions using biomimetic membranes turned out to be extremely helpful to get better mechanistic insight into the dynamics of these processes. In this review, we discuss some of the recent developments using in vitro assays to dissect the role of the players involved: lipids in the membrane, proteins binding to membranes and proteins binding to membrane proteins. We also summarize advantages and disadvantages of supported lipid bilayers as model membrane.     

Advances in membrane mimetics and mass spectrometry for understanding membrane structure and function

Membrane proteins and lipids play roles in regulating biological functions of cells. However, the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins and lipids in biological membranes remains challenging. Native membranes typically contain heterogenous lipid mixtures and low amounts of membrane proteins. This review presents recent developments in membrane mimetics and complementary mass spectrometry approaches for the investigation of membrane protein–lipid interactions after protein expression and purification. Furthermore, it is exemplified how delipidation knowledge on membrane mimetics can be used to gain insights into the role of lipids for protein structure and function. Because every technology has its strengths and weaknesses, it becomes apparent that integrated research approaches will facilitate the investigation of complex membrane environments in the future.     

Lipid Sorting and Multivesicular Endosome Biogenesis

Intracellular organelles, including endosomes, show differences not only in protein but also in lipid composition. It is becoming clear from the work of many laboratories that the mechanisms necessary to achieve such lipid segregation can operate at very different levels, including the membrane biophysical properties, the interactions with other lipids and proteins, and the turnover rates or distribution of metabolic enzymes. In turn, lipids can directly influence the organelle membrane properties by changing biophysical parameters and by recruiting partner effector proteins involved in protein sorting and membrane dynamics. In this review, we will discuss how lipids are sorted in endosomal membranes and how they impact on endosome functions.It is now well established that membranes along the endocytic and secretory pathway show differences not only in protein but also in lipid composition. For example, lipid gradients exist along the biosynthetic pathway with increasing density of cholesterol and sphingolipids from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane (Maxfield and van Meer 2010). Also, phosphoinositides show distributions restricted to relatively well-characterized membrane territories (Di Paolo and De Camilli 2006). Given the facts that lipids are small and contain little structural information when compared with proteins, that they can diffuse rapidly within membranes, and that membranes are connected by membrane flow during transport, it is not always obvious how different lipids are segregated from each other.In this article, we will evoke different mechanisms that may contribute to the heterogeneous lipid composition of endocytic membranes, including physicochemical properties of the membrane, interactions with other proteins or lipids, and synthesis or degradation. In addition, it has also become apparent that peripheral membrane proteins often interact with membranes via diverse lipid-binding motifs, and thus that lipids directly contribute to the distribution of many peripheral membrane proteins. For example, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) is detected predominantly on early endosomes, where most characterized PI(3)P-binding proteins encoded by the human genome are found as well (Raiborg et al. 2013). We will also discuss how some lipids may regulate protein sorting and membrane transport within the endosomal system.     

Rafting through traffic: Membrane domains in cellular logistics

The intricate and tightly regulated organization of eukaryotic cells into spatially and functionally distinct membrane-bound compartments is a defining feature of complex organisms. These compartments are defined by their lipid and protein compositions, with their limiting membrane as the functional interface to the rest of the cell. Thus, proper segregation of membrane proteins and lipids is necessary for the maintenance of organelle identity, and this segregation must be maintained despite extensive, rapid membrane exchange between compartments. Sorting processes of high efficiency and fidelity are required to avoid potentially deleterious mis-targeting and maintain cellular function. Although much molecular machinery associated with membrane traffic (i.e. membrane budding/fusion/fission) has been characterized both structurally and biochemically, the mechanistic details underlying the tightly regulated distribution of membranes between subcellular locations remain to be elucidated. This review presents evidence for the role of ordered lateral membrane domains known as lipid rafts in both biosynthetic sorting in the late secretory pathway, as well as endocytosis and recycling to/from the plasma membrane. Although such evidence is extensive and the involvement of membrane domains in sorting is definitive, specific mechanistic details for raft-dependent sorting processes remain elusive.     

Sorting of proteins to storage vacuoles: how many mechanisms?

Vacuoles receive their proteins through the secretory pathway, this requires protein sorting signals and molecular machineries that, until recently, have been believed to be markedly distinct for lytic and storage vacuoles. However, new biochemical, morphological and genetic data indicate that the only known class of vacuolar sorting receptors, believed to be specific for lytic vacuoles, might also be involved in the sorting of certain storage proteins. Furthermore, storage vacuoles can have a complex multimembrane structure that is difficult to explain based on a single trafficking mechanism. A new array of possible molecular interactions is thus emerging that no longer supports a clear-cut distinction between the two types of vacuoles based on sorting signals and putative receptors.     

Protein-lipid interactions in membrane trafficking at the Golgi complex

The integrated interplay between proteins and lipids drives many key cellular processes, such as signal transduction, cytoskeleton remodelling and membrane trafficking. The last of these, membrane trafficking, has the Golgi complex as its central station. Not only does this organelle orchestrates the biosynthesis, transport and intracellular distribution of many proteins and lipids, but also its own function and structure is dictated by intimate functional and physical relationships between protein-based and lipid-based machineries. These machineries are involved in the control of the fundamental events that govern membrane traffic, such as in the budding, fission and fusion of transport intermediates, in the regulation of the shape and geometry of the Golgi membranes themselves, and, finally, in the generation of "signals" that can have local actions in the secretory system, or that may affect other cellular systems. Lipid-protein interactions rely on the abilities of certain protein domains to recognize specific lipids. These interactions are mediated, in particular, through the headgroups of the phospholipids, although a few of these protein domains are able to specifically interact with the phospholipid acyl chains. Recent evidence also indicates that some proteins and/or protein domains are more sensitive to the physical environment of the membrane bilayer (such as its curvature) than to its chemical composition.     

The Rab GTPase Ypt1p and tethering factors couple protein sorting at the ER to vesicle targeting to the Golgi apparatus

GPI-anchored proteins exit the ER in distinct vesicles from other secretory proteins, and this sorting event can be reproduced in vitro. When extracts from a uso1 mutant were used, the sorting of GPI-anchored proteins from other secretory proteins was defective. Complementation with purified Uso1p restored sorting. The Rab GTPase Ypt1p and the tethering factors Sec34p and Sec35p, but not Bet3p, a member of the TRAPP complex, were also required for protein sorting upon ER exit. Therefore, the Ypt1p tethering complex couples protein sorting in the ER to vesicle targeting to the Golgi apparatus. Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins from other secretory proteins was also observed in vivo. The sorting defect observed in vitro with uso1 and ypt1 mutants was reproduced in vivo.     

Lipids and membrane protein structures

Membrane proteins do not work alone. The interaction of proteins with membrane lipids can be highly specific and is often important for full functional and structural integrity of the protein. Providing the appropriate lipid environment is of great importance for the purification and crystallisation of membrane proteins. The lipid content can be modulated by adjusting purification protocols or by adding back native or non-native lipids. Lipids can facilitate crystallisation by stabilising the protein and by providing lattice contacts. Of special interest is the crystallisation in lipidic cubic phase and with bicelles, as they appear to provide a membrane-like environment. These strategies have been instrumental for recent successful structure determinations of a human G-protein-coupled receptor, the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Lipid supplementation can also help to obtain membrane protein structures in a native conformation, as shown for voltage-gated potassium channels. Membrane protein structures, especially those derived from lipid-enriched preparations, contain bound lipid molecules. Specific protein-lipid interactions not only require careful evaluation and interpretation, but also permit a directed approach to elucidate the structural and/or functional role of these interactions.     

Sorting out the cellular functions of sorting nexins

Sorting nexins are a diverse group of cellular trafficking proteins that are unified by the presence of a phospholipid-binding motif - the PX domain. The ability of these proteins to bind specific phospholipids, as well as their propensity to form protein-protein complexes, points to a role for these proteins in membrane trafficking and protein sorting. It will be interesting to determine whether the various sorting nexins have specialized or generalized roles in protein trafficking.     

A novel flow cytometric assay to quantify interactions between proteins and membrane lipids

A diverse set of experimental systems has been developed to probe protein-lipid interactions. These include measurements with the headgroups of membrane lipids in solution, immobilized membrane lipids, and analysis of protein binding to membrane lipids reconstituted in liposomes. Each of these methodologies has strengths but also substantial limitations. For example, measurements between proteins and lipid headgroups or with immobilized membrane lipids do not probe interactions in their natural environment, the lipid bilayer. The use of liposomes, however, was so far mostly restricted to biochemical flotation experiments that do not provide quantitative and/or kinetic data. Here, we present a fast and sensitive flow cytometric method to detect protein-lipid interactions. This technique allows for quantitative measurements of interactions between multiple fluorescently labeled proteins and membrane lipids reconstituted in lipid bilayers. The assay can be used to quantify binding efficiencies and to determine kinetic constants. The method is further characterized by a short sampling time of only a few seconds that allows for high-content screening procedures. Finally, using light scatter measurements, the described method also allows for monitoring changes of membrane curvature as well as tethering of liposomes evoked by binding of proteins.     

Yeast Lipids Can Phase-separate into Micrometer-scale Membrane Domains

The lipid raft concept proposes that biological membranes have the potential to form functional domains based on a selective interaction between sphingolipids and sterols. These domains seem to be involved in signal transduction and vesicular sorting of proteins and lipids. Although there is biochemical evidence for lipid raft-dependent protein and lipid sorting in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, direct evidence for an interaction between yeast sphingolipids and the yeast sterol ergosterol, resulting in membrane domain formation, is lacking. Here we show that model membranes formed from yeast total lipid extracts possess an inherent self-organization potential resulting in liquid-disordered-liquid-ordered phase coexistence at physiologically relevant temperature. Analyses of lipid extracts from mutants defective in sphingolipid metabolism as well as reconstitution of purified yeast lipids in model membranes of defined composition suggest that membrane domain formation depends on specific interactions between yeast sphingolipids and ergosterol. Taken together, these results provide a mechanistic explanation for lipid raft-dependent lipid and protein sorting in yeast.     

The phosphate carrier has an ability to be sorted to either the TIM22 pathway or the TIM23 pathway for its import into yeast mitochondria

Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol, imported into mitochondria via the TOM40 (translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane 40) complex, and follow several distinct sorting pathways to reach their destination submitochondrial compartments. Phosphate carrier (PiC) is an inner membrane protein with 6 transmembrane segments (TM1-TM6) and requires, after translocation across the outer membrane, the Tim9-Tim10 complex and the TIM22 complex to be inserted into the inner membrane. Here we analyzed an in vitro import of fusion proteins between various PiC segments and mouse dihydrofolate reductase. The fusion protein without TM1 and TM2 was translocated across the outer membrane but was not inserted into the inner membrane. The fusion proteins without TM1-TM4 were not inserted into the inner membrane but instead translocated across the inner membrane. Functional defects of Tim50 of the TIM23 complex caused either by depletion of the protein or the addition of anti-Tim50 antibodies blocked translocation of the fusion proteins without TM1-TM4 across the inner membrane, suggesting that lack of TM1-TM4 led to switch of its sorting pathway from the TIM22 pathway to the TIM23 pathway. PiC thus appears to have a latent signal for sorting to the TIM23 pathway, which is exposed by reduced interactions with the Tim9-Tim10 complex and maintenance of the import competence.     

Protein–lipid interactions studied with designed transmembrane peptides: role of hydrophobic matching and interfacial anchoring (Review)

Biological membranes are characterized by a heterogeneous composition, which is not only manifested in the wide variety of their components, but also in aspects like the lateral organization, topology, and conformation of proteins and lipids. In bringing about the correct membrane structure, protein–lipid interactions can be expected to play a prominent role. The extent of hydrophobic matching between transmembrane protein segments and lipids potentially constitutes a versatile director of membrane organization, because a tendency to avoid hydrophobic mismatch could result in compensating adaptations such as tilt of the transmembrane segment or segregation into distinct domains. Also, interfacial interactions between lipid headgroups and the aromatic and charged residues that typically flank transmembrane domains may act as an organizing element. In this review, we discuss the numerous model studies that have systematically explored the influence of hydrophobic matching and interfacial anchoring on membrane structure. Designed peptides consisting of a polyleucine or polyleucine/alanine hydrophobic stretch, which is flanked on both sides by tryptophan or lysine residues, reflect the general layout of transmembrane protein segments. It is shown for phosphatidylcholine bilayers and for other model membranes that these peptides adapt a transmembrane topology without extensive peptide or lipid adaptations under conditions of hydrophobic matching, but that significant rearrangements can result from hydrophobic mismatch. Moreover, these effects depend on the nature of the flanking residues, implying a modulation of the mismatch response by interfacial interactions of the flanking residues. The implications of these model studies for the organization of biomembranes are discussed in the context of recent experiments with more complex systems.     

Myosin VI is required for sorting of AP-1B-dependent cargo to the basolateral domain in polarized MDCK cells

In polarized epithelial cells, newly synthesized membrane proteins are delivered on specific pathways to either the apical or basolateral domains, depending on the sorting motifs present in these proteins. Because myosin VI has been shown to facilitate secretory traffic in nonpolarized cells, we investigated its role in biosynthetic trafficking pathways in polarized MDCK cells. We observed that a specific splice isoform of myosin VI with no insert in the tail domain is required for the polarized transport of tyrosine motif containing basolateral membrane proteins. Sorting of other basolateral or apical cargo, however, does not involve myosin VI. Site-directed mutagenesis indicates that a functional complex consisting of myosin VI, optineurin, and probably the GTPase Rab8 plays a role in the basolateral delivery of membrane proteins, whose sorting is mediated by the clathrin adaptor protein complex (AP) AP-1B. Our results suggest that myosin VI is a crucial component in the AP-1B-dependent biosynthetic sorting pathway to the basolateral surface in polarized epithelial cells.