Stéroides sexuels et ostéoporose chez l'homme

Several epidemiological studies have shown that about 25 per cent of hip fractures and 20 per cent of symptomatic vertebral fractures occur in men. The lifetime risk of hip fracture was estimated to be about 6 to 8 per cent and the risk of any osteoporotic fracture was estimated to be about 18 per cent in 50-year-old white men. In about 60% of cases in men, bone loss is secondary to several pathological conditions, such as long-term steroid therapy, severe hypogonadism, smoking or alcohol abuse or gastrointestinal disorders. In 40% of cases, osteoporosis is primary or idiopathic in men between the ages of 40 and 60 years. Genetic factors, a defect of boneforming cells or abnormal serum levels of bioavailable sex steroids could explain bone loss and fragility fractures in these men. It has been shown that hypogonadism is associated with a marked increase in bone remodelling and particularly in bone resorption with a dramatic loss in trabecular bone. It is now known that testosterone is partly transformed into estradiol by aromatase. Testosterone may therefore act on bone in two ways: it directly stimulates bone formation and estradiol regulates bone remodelling and inhibits bone resorption. Finally, in men over the age of 60 without hypogonadism, it has been shown that bone mineral density and fracture risk were better correlated with serum levels of bioavailable estradiol and Sex Hormone Binding Globulin than with serum testosterone levels.     

When,Where and How Osteoporosis-Associated Fractures Occur: An Analysis from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW)

Objective

To examine when, where and how fractures occur in postmenopausal women.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW), including women aged ≥55 years from the United States of America, Canada, Australia and seven European countries. Women completed questionnaires including fracture data at baseline and years 1, 2 and 3.

Results

Among 60,393 postmenopausal women, 4122 incident fractures were reported (86% non-hip, non-vertebral [NHNV], 8% presumably clinical vertebral and 6% hip). Hip fractures were more likely to occur in spring, with little seasonal variation for NHNV or spine fractures. Hip fractures occurred equally inside or outside the home, whereas 65% of NHNV fractures occurred outside and 61% of vertebral fractures occurred inside the home. Falls preceded 68–86% of NHNV and 68–83% of hip fractures among women aged ≤64 to ≥85 years, increasing with age. About 45% of vertebral fractures were associated with falls in all age groups except those ≥85 years, when only 24% occurred after falling.

Conclusion

In this multi-national cohort, fractures occurred throughout the year, with only hip fracture having a seasonal variation, with a higher proportion in spring. Hip fractures occurred equally within and outside the home, spine fractures more often in the home, and NHNV fractures outside the home. Falls were a proximate cause of most hip and NHNV fractures. Postmenopausal women at risk for fracture need counseling about reducing potentially modifiable fracture risk factors, particularly falls both inside and outside the home and during all seasons of the year.     

The prospective evaluation of the osteoporotic vertebral fractures incidence in a random population sample

Introduction Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are mostly incidental but in some patients may lead to clinical symptoms, characteristic deformations of the vertebral column and increase total mortality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and risk factors for osteoporosis in a random sample of Szczecin inhabitants aged over 50 in the relation to the whole European population examined in the frame of EVOS (European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study) and its prospective phase - EPOS (European Prospective Osteoporosis Study). At the baseline, 607 persons were studied, including 301 women and 306 men. Material and methods The questionnaire on the risk factors for osteoporosis and the spine X-rays analysed by morphometry, were taken in all subjects. The incidence of osteoporotic vertebral deformity in the studied population was similar in both sexes (12.6% women and 10,3% men) but in men aged 50-64 fracture incidence was significantly higher in comparison with women. The prevalence of new vertebral fractures examined after 4 years was higher in women than in men (9.1 vs 6.4/1000 persons years). Among the risk factors for osteoporosis, low physical activity and prolonged immobilization in women significantly influenced the incidence of vertebral deformities. Conclusions: 1) The study shows the high incidence of risk factors and osteoporotic vertebral deformities in the population of Szczecin inhabitants aged over 50. 2) Visual assessment only with a combination with morphometry is an optimal tool for detection of incident vertebral fractures.     

MTHFR C677T polymorphism and osteoporotic fractures.

The C677T (rs1801133) polymorphism of MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) has been associated with the risk of cardiovascular events, and also with osteoporosis in some studies. However, the results are controversial. Our objective was to determine the relationship of the polymorphism with osteoporotic fractures by means of a case-control study. C677T was analyzed in 823 subjects (365 controls, 136 with vertebral fractures and 322 with hip fracture) by using a Taqman assay. The distribution of MTHFR genotypes was similar in patients and controls. In comparison with TC/CC genotypes, the age-adjusted OR for hip fractures of the TT genotype was 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.6-1.7) in women and 0.7 (0.3-1.8) in men. The OR for vertebral fractures was 0.8 (0.4-1.7) in women and 1.7 (0.4-6.7) in men. A meta-analysis combining these data with previous reports confirmed the lack of association between MTHFR and fractures, with an OR of 1.1 (0.7-1.9, p=0.65) for vertebral fractures and 1.2 (0.7-2.0; p=0.45) for peripheral fractures, but there was significant heterogeneity among the results of individual studies, particularly about peripheral fractures. In conclusion, the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene does not appear to be associated with the overall risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, given the heterogeneity of the results of published studies, further investigations are needed to evaluate its influence in specific population subgroups.     

Raloxifene: results from the MORE study

Raloxifene is the first Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM) approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Acting as an estrogen agonist in the skeleton and on lipid metabolism, raloxifene maintains bone mineral density (BMD) and prevents new vertebral fractures while improving the lipid profile in postmenopausal women. In an osteoporosis prevention study, 601 women without osteoporosis, aged 45 to 60 years, were assigned to receive a placebo or raloxifene 30, 60, or 150 mg/day. All women received calcium (400 to 600 mg/day). Raloxifene 60 mg increased BMD by 2.4% at both the lumbar spine and hip compared with the placebo at 36 months. More importantly, however, raloxifene significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures in Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE), a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial of 7705 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The women, with a mean age of 66.5 years, and with hip or spine T-score <-2.5 and/or prevalent vertebral fractures, were assigned to receive either a placebo or 60 mg or 120 mg of raloxifene. All women were provided supplemental calcium (500 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 IU/day). After 36 months, raloxifene 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day, reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 55% (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.3, 0.7; p<0.001), and 40% (RR 0.60, CI 0.4, 0.9) in women without prevalent baseline fractures, respectively; and by 31% (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6, 0.9; p<0.001), and 49% (RR 0.5, CI 0.4, 0.6) in women with prevalent baseline fractures compared with the placebo. There was no difference in the proportion of women reporting non-traumatic, non - spine fractures among women receiving raloxifene compared to the placebo-treated women. Compared with placebo, BMD increased after 36 months by 2.1 and 2.6% at the femoral neck and spine, respectively, in the 60mg raloxifene group, and by 2.4 and 2.7% at the femoral neck and spine, respectively, in the 120mg raloxifene group. By 40 months of follow-up, there was a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (38 cases) and pulmonary embolus (17 cases) in the combined raloxifene groups than in the placebo group (5 and 3 cases,), with a relative risk of 3.1, (CI 1.5-6.2). By 40 months, 54 women had a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer with a relative risk compared to placebo of 0.35, (CI, 0.21-0.58). Raloxifene therapy for 3 years maintains BMD in healthy postmenopausal women and significantly reduces the risk of new vertebral fractures by about half in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Raloxifene also reduces the risk of breast cancer by 65% in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis thus providing a new choice for addressing postmenopausal health concerns.     

Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the ability of measurements of bone density in women to predict later fractures. DESIGN-- Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 1985 and end of 1994 with a baseline measurement of bone density in women and subsequent follow up for fractures. For comparative purposes, we also reviewed case control studies of hip fractures published between 1990 and 1994. SUBJECTS--Eleven separate study populations with about 90,000 person years of observation time and over 2000 fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Relative risk of fracture for a decrease in bone mineral density of one standard deviation below age adjusted mean. RESULTS--All measuring sites had similar predictive abilities (relative risk 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 1.6)) for decrease in bone mineral density except for measurement at spine for predicting vertebral fractures (relative risk 2.3 (1.9 to 2.8)) and measurement at hip for hip fractures (2.6 (2.0 to 3.5)). These results are in accordance with results of case-control studies. Predictive ability of decrease in bone mass was roughly similar to (or, for hip or spine measurements, better than) that of a 1 SD increase in blood pressure for stroke and better than a 1 SD increase in serum cholesterol concentration for cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS--Measurements of bone mineral density can predict fracture risk but cannot identify individuals who will have a fracture. We do not recommend a programme of screening menopausal women for osteoporosis by measuring bone density.     

In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures

PurposeTo experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture risk in subjects with and without osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as gold standard.MethodsOne fresh-frozen human femur specimen was mechanically tested and fractured simulating stance and clinically relevant fall loading configurations to the hip. After experimental in-vitro validation, the FEA simulation protocol was transferred to standard contrast-enhanced in-vivo MDCT images to calculate individual hip fracture risk each for 4 subjects with and without a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures matched by age and gender. In addition, FEA based risk factor calculations were compared to manual femoral BMD measurements of all subjects.ResultsIn-vitro simulations showed good correlation with the experimentally measured strains both in stance (R² = 0.963) and fall configuration (R² = 0.976). The simulated maximum stress overestimated the experimental failure load (4743 N) by 14.7% (5440 N) while the simulated maximum strain overestimated by 4.7% (4968 N). The simulated failed elements coincided precisely with the experimentally determined fracture locations. BMD measurements in subjects with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures did not differ significantly from subjects without fragility fractures (femoral head: p = 0.989; femoral neck: p = 0.366), but showed higher FEA based risk factors for additional incident hip fractures (p = 0.028).ConclusionFEA simulations were successfully validated by elastic and destructive in-vitro experiments. In the subsequent in-vivo analyses, MDCT based FEA based risk factor differences for additional hip fractures were not mirrored by according BMD measurements. Our data suggests, that MDCT derived FEA models may assess bone strength more accurately than BMD measurements alone, providing a valuable in-vivo fracture risk assessment tool.     

The Association between Aortic Calcification and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women in China: The Prospective Chongqing Osteoporosis Study

Purpose

Fractures are associated with cardiovascular diseases in the elderly. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between aortic calcification (AC) and the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Methods

A prospective study with 5 years of follow-up in 1724 postmenopausal women (aged 50 years old and older) was conducted from July 2005 to June 2010. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was utilized to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD). Aortic calcification score (ACS) was determined by a semi-quantitative method and was further categorized into four groups. Cox proportional hazards models were established to assess the association between AC and the risk of vertebral fractures.

Results

For subjects with AC, the incidence of vertebral fractures was higher than that of those without AC (p<0.01). After adjustment for age and other potential confounders, it was found that severe AC (G4, ACS>6; G3, ACS = 3–6) was associated with vertebral fractures. Severe AC (G4) was associated with non-vertebral fractures. There were higher risk for the vertebral fractures in two groups and higher risk for non-vertebral fractures in one group.

Conclusions

The results of the current study indicate that severe AC is associated with a significantly increased risk of vertebral fractures and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women in China.     

Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Relationship with Sites of Fragility Fractures in Elderly Chinese Men and Women

Objective

Sarcopenia might be associated with bone fragility in elderly individuals. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with fragility fracture sites in elderly Chinese patients.

Methods

Patients (322 men and 435 women) aged 65–94 years and with a history of fragility fractures in the ankle, wrist, vertebrae or hip, and healthy men (n = 1263) and women (n = 1057) aged 65–92 years without a history of fractures were enrolled. Whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to analyze skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), fat mass and bone mineral density. Sarcopenia was defined as SMI less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young reference group.

Results

Sarcopenia occurrence varied with fracture location. Sarcopenia was more common in females with vertebral and hip fractures and in men with hip and ankle fractures than in the non-fracture group). Sarcopenia was significantly more prevalent in men with wrist, hip and ankle fractures than in women. SMI was correlated with BMD in different fracture groups. Logistic regression analyses revealed that lower SMI was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture both in men and women and ankle fracture in men.

Discussion

Sarcopenia may be an independent risk factor for hip and ankle fractures in men, and for hip fractures in women.     

Association of CYP19 Gene Polymorphism with Vertebral Fractures in Japanese Postmenopausal Women

This study investigates aromatase gene polymorphism, which might influence bone strength in terms of mineral density and quality. We explored the relationship between CYP19 polymorphisms and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Japanese women. In addition, we compared estrogen and testosterone levels in Japanese postmenopausal women with and without fractures. Osteoporotic postmenopausal women showed higher incidences of vertebral fractures than osteopenic women or women with normal lumbar bone mineral density (L2-4 BMD). Estrogen concentrations in postmenopausal women were associated with BMD; however, no association was found between sex hormone levels and the presence of fractures. The C allele rs2470152 was significantly associated with increased risk of vertebral fractures (P = 0.04), whereas none of the CYP19 polymorphisms showed differences in sex steroid levels between subjects with and without fractures. Allelic variants of aromatase genes appear to interact to influence the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Japanese women.     

A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking,bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the magnitude and importance of the relation between smoking, bone mineral density, and risk of hip fracture according to age. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 29 published cross sectional studies reporting the difference in bone density in 2156 smokers and 9705 non-smokers according to age, and of 19 cohort and case-control studies recording 3889 hip fractures reporting risk in smokers relative to non-smokers. RESULTS: In premenopausal women bone density was similar in smokers and non-smokers. Postmenopausal bone loss was greater in current smokers than non-smokers, bone density diminishing by about an additional 2% for every 10 year increase in age, with a difference of 6% at age 80. In current smokers relative to non-smokers the risk of hip fracture was similar at age 50 but greater thereafter by an estimated 17% at age 60, 41% at 70, 71% at 80, and 108% at 90. These estimates of relative risk by age, derived directly from a regression analysis of the studies of smoking and hip fracture, were close to estimates using the difference in bone density between smokers and non-smokers and the association between bone density and risk of hip fracture. The estimated cumulative risk of hip fracture in women in England was 19% in smokers and 12% in non-smokers to age 85; 37% and 22% to age 90. Among all women, one hip fracture in eight is attributable to smoking. Limited data in men suggest a similar proportionate effect of smoking as in women. The association was not explained by smokers being thinner, younger at menopause, and exercising less nor by actions of smoking on oestrogen, but smoking may have a direct action on bone. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture in old age is a major adverse effect of smoking after the menopause. The cumulative excess bone loss over decades is substantial, increasing the lifetime risk of hip fracture by about half.     

Organization of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">MASP2</Emphasis> locus and its expression profile in mouse and rat

The identification of vertebral fracture in osteoporosis is based mainly on the identification of abnormal variation in vertebral shape, but this can be misleading in the presence of a non-fracture deformity or normal variant of vertebral shape. Qualitative identification of vertebral fracture (Qual) is influenced by the subjectivity of the approach, and although more objective, the semiquantitative method (SQ) can be difficult to apply. In addition, there has been little independent evaluation of SQ in relation to other approaches. We aimed to evaluate a new algorithm-based approach for the qualitative identification of vertebral fracture (ABQ) and to compare it with SQ and Qual. Two radiologists reported spinal radiographs for 372 postmenopausal women using Qual (reader 1), and SQ and ABQ (reader 2). Non-fracture deformities and normal variants were also reported using Qual and ABQ. The prevalence of vertebral fracture by subjects was higher for SQ (24%) than for Qual (11%) and ABQ (7%). Agreement was poor between SQ and the other methods, and moderate between Qual and ABQ. Twenty-two women with vertebral fracture were agreed by all three methods, similar to the total identified by ABQ (25 women). Seventeen women diagnosed with fracture by Qual, had non-fracture deformity or normal variant (but no fracture) according to ABQ. Of the women with SQ fractures, 53% and 70% were identified negative for fracture but positive for non-fracture deformity or normal variant by ABQ and Qual. The main sources of discrepancy between SQ and the other methods were Scheuermanns disease, normal variation, and degenerative change accompanied by short anterior vertebral height. For all methods, bone mineral density (BMD) and BMD Z-scores were lower in women with vertebral fractures than in those with no fractures. Bone mineral density and BMD Z-scores were also lower at the lumbar spine and total body in women with vertebral fractures according to Qual and ABQ than they were for SQ, and were lower in women with SQ fractures agreed by Qual and ABQ, compared with those diagnosed negative for fracture by Qual and ABQ (p<0.01). We conclude that poor agreement between methods arises mainly from difficulties in differentiating true fracture from non-fracture deformity. Our new approach attempts to address this problem but requires further testing in a larger study population.     

Effects of smoking and alcohol consumption on vertebral deformity in the elderly--an epidemiological study

The aim of the study was to assess the role of smoking and alcohol consumption as possible risk factors for vertebral deformities in an elderly Croatian population sample. Data on smoking habit, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and overall life activity were collected in 425 randomly chosen community dwelling subjects. Radiographic morphometric method was used to assess vertebral deformities of thoracic and lumbar spine. Men smoked and drank significantly more than women. There was no association of either smoking status or number of cigarettes, or frequency of alcohol intake with prevalent vertebral deformities. There was a tendency of an increased risk of vertebral deformities in heavy drinkers (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 0.98-2.91), and a reduced risk of these deformities in female regular drinkers (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.14-3.66). Further studies in the Croatian population are needed to establish the association of smoking and alcohol consumption with vertebral deformities.     

Age-Related Factors Associated With The Risk of Hip Fracture

ObjectiveAdvancing age is a powerful risk factor for hip fractures. The biological mechanisms through which aging impacts the risk of hip fractures have not been well studied.MethodsBiological factors associated with “advancing age” that help to explain how aging is associated with the risk of hip fractures are reviewed. The findings are based on analyses of the Cardiovascular Health Study, an ongoing observational study of adults aged ≥65 years with 25 years of follow-up.ResultsThe following 5 age-related factors were found to be significantly associated with the risk of hip fractures: (1) microvascular disease of the kidneys (albuminuria and/or elevated urine-albumin-to-creatinine ratio) and brain (abnormal white matter disease on brain magnetic resonance imaging); (2) increased serum levels of carboxymethyl-lysine, an advanced glycation end product that reflects glycation and oxidative stress; (3) reduced parasympathetic tone, as derived from 24-hour Holter monitoring; (4) carotid artery atherosclerosis in the absence of clinical cardiovascular disease; and (5) increased transfatty acid levels in the blood. Each of these factors was associated with a 10% to 25% increased risk of fractures. These associations were independent of traditional risk factors for hip fractures.ConclusionSeveral factors associated with older age help to explain how “aging” may be associated with the risk of hip fractures. These same factors may also explain the high risk of mortality following hip fractures.     

The incidence of hip, forearm, humeral, ankle, and vertebral fragility fractures in Italy: results from a 3-year multicenter study

Introduction

We aimed to assess the incidence and hospitalization rate of hip and "minor" fragility fractures in the Italian population.

Methods

We carried out a 3-year survey at 10 major Italian emergency departments to evaluate the hospitalization rate of hip, forearm, humeral, ankle, and vertebral fragility fractures in people 45 years or older between 2004 and 2006, both men and women. These data were compared with those recorded in the national hospitalizations database (SDO) to assess the overall incidence of fragility fractures occurring at hip and other sites, including also those events not resulting in hospital admissions.

Results

We observed 29,017 fractures across 3 years, with hospitalization rates of 93.0% for hip fractures, 36.3% for humeral fractures, 31.3% for ankle fractures, 22.6% for forearm/wrist fractures, and 27.6% for clinical vertebral fractures. According to the analyses performed with the Italian hospitalization database in year 2006, we estimated an annual incidence of 87,000 hip, 48,000 humeral, 36,000 ankle, 85,000 wrist, and 155,000 vertebral fragility fractures in people aged 45 years or older (thus resulting in almost 410,000 new fractures per year). Clinical vertebral fractures were recorded in 47,000 events per year.

Conclusions

The burden of fragility fractures in the Italian population is very high and calls for effective preventive strategies.     

Meta-Analysis of Clinical Fracture Risk Reduction of Antiosteoporosis Drugs: Direct and Indirect Comparisons and Meta-Regressions

ObjectiveAntiosteoporotic drug (AOD) trials have variabilities in duration and fracture risks. This study evaluated AOD’s versus controls regarding reduction in relative rates and rate differences in vertebral and hip fractures and comparative costs.MethodsPrimary randomized controlled trials of antiosteoporotic drugs in postmenopausal women with documentation of vertebral fracture rates or hip fracture rates were extracted from meta-analyses and PubMed through February 2021. Direct and indirect meta-analyses and meta-regressions analyzed the fracture reductions.ResultsThere were 24 randomized controlled trials of drug versus placebo (73 862 women) and 10 randomized controlled trials of drug versus drug. The reductions in the relative rates of vertebral fractures were significant for antiresorptive (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, and raloxifene) and anabolic (teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab) drugs. Denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide were more effective in reducing vertebral fracture rates than oral bisphosphates (all P < .05) but were not more effective in reducing vertebral fracture rates than zoledronate. The reductions in hip fracture rates were significant for alendronate, denosumab, and zoledronate (all P < .05), without significant differences among drugs. Anabolic drugs did not show significant hip fracture rate reduction. Meta-regression of rate differences enabled the calculation of costs per vertebral fracture prevented, which were estimated at >$100 000 for anabolic drugs and between $2289 and $28 947 for antiresorptive drugs. Many direct drug versus drug trials were underpowered to demonstrate benefits of one drug over another.ConclusionThis study suggests goal-directed, cost-effective therapies relative to patient risk for vertebral and hip fractures. Anabolic drugs are better at preventing vertebral fractures than oral bisphosphonates. Anabolic drugs are not superior to zoledronate or denosumab and are substantially more expensive. When comparing drugs that prevented hip fractures, there was no statistical benefit of any drug.     

Editor's preface

BACKGROUND: The decisions that postmenopausal women make about whether to start hormone replacement therapy may depend on the potential risks and benefits of such therapy as well as their risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. This study examined the decisions made by women at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures who were educated about hormone replacement therapy and who were given information about their bone mineral density. METHODS: The study employed a prospective cohort design. Thirty-seven post--menopausal women with risk factors for osteoporosis-related fractures were recruited from an orthopedic clinic at a teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ont. The women were given an education kit (consisting of an audio tape and a work-book) to clarify the benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy. Two to 4 weeks later, densitometry of the hip and the lumbar spine was performed. A summary of the risks, the densitometry findings and decisions about hormone replacement therapy were given to the women''s family physicians for follow-up. Outcome measures included decisions about hormone replacement therapy, as well as use of such therapy and other medications at 12 months. RESULTS: After the education component alone, 10 (27%) of the women requested hormone replacement therapy. After densitometry testing, 4 more requested hormone replacement therapy (for a total of 14 women [38%]). At 12 months, 2 (5%) of the women had been lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 35, 6 (17%) were receiving hormone replacement therapy, 7 (20%) were using bisphosphonates, and 24 (68%) were taking calcium supplements. INTERPRETATION: These preliminary findings suggest that the combination of education about hormone therapy and feedback about bone density is associated with an increase in the use of hormone replacement therapy and other preventive medications by women at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. However, the observed increase was small and so the clinical significance must be confirmed and clarified.     

Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis

Background

Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone may increase the incidence of fractures. We aimed to determine systematically the risk of fractures associated with thiazolidinedione therapy and to evaluate the effect of the therapy on bone density.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), other trial registries and product information sheets through June 2008. We selected long-term (≥ 1 year) randomized controlled trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes and controlled observational studies that described the risk of fractures or changes in bone density with thiazolidinediones. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for fractures and the weighted mean difference in bone density.

Results

We analyzed data from 10 randomized controlled trials involving 13 715 participants and from 2 observational studies involving 31 679 participants. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were associated with a significantly increased risk of fractures overall in the 10 randomized controlled trials (OR 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.79; p < 0.001). Five randomized controlled trials showed a significantly increased risk of fractures among women (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.65–3.01; p < 0.001) but not among men (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73–1.39; p = 0.98). The 2 observational studies demonstrated an increased risk of fractures associated with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Bone mineral density in women exposed to thiazolidinediones was significantly reduced at the lumbar spine (weighted mean difference –1.11%, 95% CI –2.08% to –0.14%; p = 0.02) and hip (weighted mean difference –1.24%, 95%CI –2.34% to –0.67%; p < 0.001) in 2 randomized controlled trials.

Interpretation

Long-term thiazolidinedione use doubles the risk of fractures among women with type 2 diabetes, without a significant increase in risk of fractures among men with type 2 diabetes.Recent systematic reviews have focused on the adverse cardiovascular effects of the thiazolidinediones rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.^1–5 In late 2006, the risk of fractures with the use of rosiglitazone was raised in a footnote of the report of the A Diabetes Outcome and Progression Trial (ADOPT).⁶ The manufacturers of rosiglitazone⁷ and pioglitazone followed this up by issuing warning letters about the risk of fractures.^7–9Women with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of nonvertebral fractures,¹⁰ with a near doubling in the risk of hip fractures.¹¹ Any additional risk from thiazolidinedione therapy could have a considerable impact. Our primary objective was to determine systematically the relative and absolute risks of fractures with long-term thiazolidinedione therapy for type 2 diabetes. We also reviewed the effect of thiazolidinedione therapy on bone mineral density to ascertain its biological plausibility.     

Quantitative assessment of the associations between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis

Many studies have investigated the associations between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures, but the impact of MTHFR polymorphisms on fractures risk is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aims to quantify the strength of association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Wanfang databases for articles relating the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures in humans. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the associations. Meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of any site fractures (for T vs. C, OR = 1.17, 95 % CI 1.03–1.32; for TT vs. CC, OR = 1. 31, 95 % CI 1.11–1.54; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.43; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.13–1.51). Besides, MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was also associated with increased risk of any site fractures. Subgroup meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of vertebral fractures under three genetic contrast modes (for TT vs. CC, OR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.05–1.95; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.01–1.85; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.50, 95 % CI 1.17–1.91), but there was no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures (all P values were more than 0.05). Thus, individuals with homozygote genotype TT of MTHFR C677T have obviously increased risk of vertebral fractures compared those with heterozygote genotype CT or homozygote genotype CC. There is no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures.     

Osteoporosis Treatment After Osteoporotic Fractures: Data From a Single Medical Center

ObjectiveMost patients do not receive osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fracture. This study reviewed osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fractures in a center without a Fracture Liaison Service.MethodsWe identified all patients with hip, vertebral, humeral or radial fractures, evaluated in Meir Medical Center, in 2017. The exclusion criteria were not a Clalit Health Services member, high-energy fracture or 30-day postoperative mortality. The primary endpoint was osteoporosis drugs issued within 12 months of fracture. Secondary endpoints included bone densitometry and 1-year mortality.ResultsFive-hundred-eighty-two patients (average age 78.6 ± 11.1 years, 75.8% women) were included. There were 321 (55.5%) hip, 84 (14.1%) humeral, 33 (5.6%) vertebral, and 144 (24.7%) radial fractures. Osteoporosis drugs were issued to 26.5% of the patients; those with humeral fractures received the least (21.4%) and vertebral, the most (30.3%; P = .51). Bone densitometry was performed in 23.2% of patients. One-year mortality after hip fracture was 12.1%, followed by humeral (3.6%; P < .05). Logistic regression showed that previous treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–15.2), bone densitometry (OR = 4.4; 95% CI 2.6–7.4) and endocrinology visit (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.6) were the most important factors associated with treatment.ConclusionFewer than one third of patients received pharmacotherapy within 1 year after fracture. Because pharmacotherapy reduces future fractures and mortality, we recommend that medical staff who care for patients with fracture adopt practical and effective strategies to increase treatment rates among patients with osteoporotic fractures.