Influence of growth hormone on accretion of bone mass

Growth hormone (GH) exerts important influences on bone metabolism during lifespan. During childhood, GH is a major determinant of acquisition of bone mass and in adult life, GH partly determines the rate of bone remodelling and therefore influences maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD). Insights into the importance of GH in these respects may be obtained by studies of BMD and indices of bone remodelling in GH deficiency (GHD) of adult-onset and childhood-onset. Adult-onset GHD, usually accompanied by other features of hypopituitarism, may be associated with osteopenia and an increased fracture risk. Postulated mechanisms include GHD and gonadal steroid deficiency of unknown duration; glucocorticoid and thyroxine replacement do not appear to exert a major role. GH replacement in adult-onset GHD results in an early increment in indices of bone remodelling which persists for up to 5 years; BMD increases by 0.5-1.0 SD in males and stabilizes in females over this time period. In adolescents with GHD who traditionally discontinue GH at completion of linear growth, BMD is substantially lower than peak bone mass for a young adult population. Studies addressing the effects of continuation of GH after achievement of final height are currently underway and will provide insights into the possible need to continue GH into adult life. Such studies may confirm a role for GH in promoting continued accrual of bone mass and thereby demonstrate that cessation of GH at achievement of final height, by limiting peak bone mass, may predispose to clinically significant osteoporosis in later life. In addition to the potential importance of GH for achievement of peak bone mass, there may be a superimposed accelerated loss of BMD with advancing age similar to the situation observed in adult-onset GHD. To date, this has been difficult to assess in adult GHD of childhood-onset because the relative contributions of low peak bone mass and increased loss of bone in later life could not be distinguished.     

Impact of growth hormone status on body composition and the skeleton

Severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) induces a well-defined clinical entity encompassing, amongst the most reported features, abnormalities of body composition, in particular increased fat mass, especially truncal, and reduced lean body mass. The results from virtually all treatment studies are in agreement that GH replacement improves the body composition profile of GHD patients by increasing lean body mass and reducing fat mass. More recently, the observations have been extended to adults with partial GHD, defined by a peak GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia of 3-7 microg/l. These patients exhibit abnormalities of body composition similar in nature to those described in adults with severe GHD; these include an increase in total fat mass of around 3.5 kg and a reduction of lean body mass of around 5.5 kg. The increase in fat mass is predominantly distributed within the trunk. The degree of abnormality of body composition is intermediate between that of healthy subjects and that of adults with GHD. The impact of GH replacement on body composition in adults with GH insufficiency, although predictable, has not been formally documented. The skeleton is another biological endpoint affected by GH status: in adults with severe GHD, low bone mass has been reported using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and other quantitative methodologies. The importance of low bone mass, in any clinical setting, is as a surrogate marker for the future risk of fracture. Several retrospective studies have documented an increased prevalence of fractures in untreated GHD adults. Hypopituitary adults with severe GHD have reduced markers of bone turnover which normalize with GH replacement, indicating that GH, directly or via induction of insulin-like growth factor-I, is intimately involved in skeletal modelling. Whilst the evidence that GH plays an important role in the acquisition of bone mass during adolescence and early adult life is impressive, the impact of GHD acquired later in adulthood is less clear. Recently we examined the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and age in 125 untreated adults with severe GHD using DEXA. A significant positive correlation was observed between BMD (z-scores) and age at all skeletal sites studied. Overall, few patients, except those aged less than 30 years, had significantly reduced bone mass (i.e. a BMD z-score of less than -2); correction of BMD to provide a pseudo-volumetric measure of BMD suggested that reduced stature of the younger patients may explain, at least in part, this higher frequency of subnormal BMD z-scores. Despite normal BMD, however, an increase in fracture prevalence may still be observed in elderly GHD adults as a consequence of increased falls related to muscle weakness and visual field defects.     

Growth hormone and bone health

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I have major effects on growth plate chondrocytes and all bone cells. Untreated childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) markedly impairs linear growth as well as three-dimensional bone size. Adult peak bone mass is therefore about 50% that of adults with normal height. This is mainly an effect on bone volume, whereas true bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm(3)) is virtually normal, as demonstrated in a large cohort of untreated Russian adults with childhood-onset GHD. The prevalence of fractures in these untreated childhood-onset GHD adults was, however, markedly and significantly increased in comparison with normal Russian adults. This clearly indicates that bone mass and bone size matter more than true bone density. Adequate treatment with GH can largely correct bone size and in several studies also bone mass, but it usually requires more than 5 years of continuous treatment. Adult-onset GHD decreases bone turnover and results in a mild deficit, generally between -0.5 and -1.0 z-score, in bone mineral content and BMD of the lumbar spine, radius and femoral neck. Cross-sectional surveys and the KIMS data suggest an increased incidence of fractures. GH replacement therapy increases bone turnover. The three controlled studies with follow-up periods of 18 and 24 months demonstrated a modest increase in BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in male adults with adult-onset GHD, whereas no significant changes in BMD were observed in women. GHD, whether childhood- or adult-onset, impairs bone mass and strength. Appropriate substitution therapy can largely correct these deficiencies if given over a prolonged period. GH therapy for other bone disorders not associated with primary GHD needs further study but may well be beneficial because of its positive effects on the bone remodelling cycle.     

Effects of growth hormone replacement therapy on bone markers and bone mineral density in growth hormone-deficient adults

During the 1990s, interest in the effects of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults increased, and several studies were performed to evaluate the effects of growth hormone (GH) substitution therapy in these patients. Because adults with GHD have reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures, the effects of GH replacement therapy on bone metabolism have been evaluated in long-term studies. A universal finding is that the serum and urinary levels of biochemical bone markers increase during GH substitution therapy, and these increases are dose dependent. After years of GH substitution therapy, the levels of biochemical bone markers remain elevated, according to some studies, whereas other studies report that these levels return to baseline. BMD of the spine, hip and forearm increase after 18-24 months of treatment. Bone mineral content (BMC) increases to a greater extent than BMD, because the areal projection of bone also increases. This difference could be caused by increased periosteal bone formation, but a measurement artefact resulting from the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cannot be excluded as a possible explanation. One study of GH-deficient adults found that, after 33 months of GH treatment, BMD and BMC increased to a greater extent in men with GHD than in women. There is also a gender difference in the increases in serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I and biochemical bone markers during GH treatment. The reason for these findings is unknown, and the role of sex steroids in determining the response to GH therapy remains to be fully elucidated.     

Long-term effects of growth hormone therapy on bone mineral density,body composition,and serum lipid levels in growth hormone deficient children: a 6-year follow-up study

AIM: To study the effects of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) and GH replacement therapy (GHRx) on bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition. METHODS: 59 GHD children participated (age range 0.4-16.9 years); the follow-up period was 6 years. Lumbar spine BMD (BMD(LS)), total-body BMD (BMD(TB)), and body composition were measured prospectively using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean BMD(LS )and BMD(TB) were significantly reduced at the time of the diagnosis. The bone mineral apparent density of the lumbar spine (BMAD(LS)) was reduced to a lesser degree. The BMAD(LS) increased to normal values after 1 year; BMD(LS) and BMD(TB) normalized 1 year later. At the time of the diagnosis, the lean body mass was reduced and steadily increased during GHRx. Percentage of body fat was increased at baseline and normalized within 6 months. The severity of GHD was not associated with the BMD at diagnosis or the response to GHRx. CONCLUSION: Areal BMD(LS) and BMD(TB) and, to a lesser extent, BMAD(LS) are decreased in GHD children, but normalize within 1-2 years.     

Adolescents with childhood-onset GHD: how do we get them to peak bone mass?

The development of osteoporosis, with its attendant risk of fragility fracture, is in part related to the peak bone mass (PBM) achieved in early adulthood. Adolescence is a critical time for the acquisition of bone mass, with around 40% of skeletal mass being accrued during pubertal maturation. Growth hormone (GH) plays an integral role in the achievement of PBM after completion of linear growth, and several recent studies have suggested that GH replacement should continue in individuals with childhood-onset GHD until PBM has been attained - irrespective of the height achieved. In those with severe GHD after growth and pubertal development are complete, a seamless transition of GH therapy into adult life may be preferable to allowing a gap in GH treatment. The 'window of opportunity' concept for achieving PBM will, nevertheless, continue to be challenged by GHD teenagers who may resent the seamless continuation of GH replacement beyond adolescence. Preparation for this possibility should therefore begin during childhood, with all GHD teenagers being encouraged to remain on GH therapy until at least their mid-20s.     

Bone densitometry: assessing the effects of growth hormone treatment in adults

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference method for the measurement of bone mineral mass at different skeletal sites. It has been widely used in recent years to assess the effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone metabolism. In normal individuals, bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD), as assessed using DXA, correlate with body size. Therefore, using DXA in patients with congenital GH deficiency (GHD), who have a smaller body frame, would be expected to result in lower bone mass. Thus, comparisons with reference data derived from populations of normal body size are invalid. The evaluation of the effects of GH administration should take into account the possible effects of GH on bone size, not only in children, but also in adults. The enlargement of bone, due to stimulation of the periosteal apposition, may partially mask an increase in BMC, resulting in little or no change in BMD. The ability of GH to affect bone area therefore requires analysis of the possible changes in bone area and BMC, as well as BMD. This issue has been poorly handled in the studies published to date. Lastly, the acceleration of bone turnover induced by GH leads to an increase in bone remodelling space, which in turn is associated with a reduction in BMC and BMD, independent of the net balance between breakdown and formation in each metabolic unit. This bone loss is completely reversible when the remodelling space returns to previous levels. This phenomenon must be taken into account when analysing the effects of GH treatment on bone mass, because a net gain in bone mass may be found in long-term GH treatment or after GH discontinuation, even if bone loss was evident during the first 6 months of treatment. In conclusion, the interpretation of bone density data in patients with GHD, and after GH administration, should take into account some of the methodological aspects of bone densitometry, as well as the specific actions of GH on bone metabolism and body composition.     

Long-term challenges in growth hormone treatment

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is defined biochemically as a response to hypoglycaemia with a peak GH concentration of less than 5 microg/l. The 'GHD syndrome' is a range of psychological and physical symptoms that are associated with GHD, which include increased central adiposity, decreased bone mineral density, abnormal lipid profiles, decreased cardiovascular performance, reduced lean body mass (LBM), social isolation, depressed mood and increased anxiety. Importantly, the combination of physical and psychological problems can often result in a reduced quality of life. A number of trials have shown that GH replacement therapy can lead to a substantial improvement in GHD associated symptoms. Following up to 12 months of treatment with GH, LBM increased, left ventricular systolic function improved and the mean volume of adipose tissue fell. After only 4 months of treatment, a rise in exercise capacity was recorded, and after 2 years' treatment, isokinetic and isometric muscle strength had normalized in proximal muscle groups. Feelings of well-being and vitality also improved significantly. However, studies on the effects of treatment on insulin sensitivity in GH-deficient patients have had conflicting results. In this paper, we will discuss the long-term consequences of GHD and the effects of GH replacement therapy.     

New paradigms for growth hormone therapy in children

Much has been learned over the last two decades regarding the management of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in children and adolescents. However, significant divergence and debate continue to exist on the ideal approach to the management of GHD. Despite active controversy, several paradigms have recently emerged which should guide the treatment of GHD patients as we head into the new millennium. The primary objectives of GH therapy remain the normalization of height in childhood and the attainment of normal adult height, but the recognition of the metabolic roles of GH define additional therapeutic benefits. A daily subcutaneous injection of recombinant human GH in a dose range of 25-50 microg/kg/day has been established as the mainstay of therapy. Alternative modes of treatment including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GH secretagogues and depot GH have been developed, but evaluation of their clinical utility remains incomplete. Careful monitoring and follow-up of pediatric GHD patients by a pediatric endocrinologist are essential. Accurate determination of height velocity and interval height increases (expressed as the change in height z score) continue to be the most important parameters in monitoring the response to treatment. Monitoring serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 has gained utility in the assurance of compliance and safety, but does not always correlate well with the growth response. A clear role for a biochemical as well as an auxological monitoring approach has nonetheless been established. The comparison of attained growth response to that which has been calculated by various modeling approaches is also becoming a valuable monitoring tool. Significant side effects of GH therapy are quite rare and are easily identified and addressed during close follow-up. Despite previous concerns, it now appears that in the absence of additional risk factors there is no evidence that long-term recipients of GH are at any increased risk of developing diabetes, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, brain tumor recurrence or leukemia. Although GHD may or may not persist into adult life, adult GHD diagnostic criteria and the importance of GH therapy in adult GHD patients have recently been established. Therefore, the pediatric endocrinologist now has a crucial role in guiding the transition to adult GHD management in collaboration with the adult endocrinologist. In the years to come, with the continued investigation and collaborationof experts from around the world, the approach to GH treatment will undoubtedly continue to evolve and improve.     

The effects of growth hormone on cortical and cancellous bone

Growth hormone (GH) has profound effects on linear bone growth, bone metabolism and bone mass. The GH receptor is found on the cell surface of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, but not on mature osteocytes. In vitro, GH stimulates proliferation, differentiation and extracellular matrix production in osteoblast-like cell lines. GH also stimulates recruitment and bone resorption activity in osteoclast-like cells. GH promotes autocrine/paracrine insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) production and endocrine (liver-derived) IGF-I production. Some of the GH-induced effects on bone cells can be blocked by IGF-I antibodies, while others cannot. In animal experiments, GH administration increases bone formation and resorption, and enhances cortical bone mass and mechanical strength. When GH induces linear growth, increased cancellous bone volume is seen, but an unaffected cancellous bone volume is found in the absence of linear growth. Patients with acromegaly have increased bone formation and resorption markers. Bone mass results are conflicting because many acromegalics have hypogonadism, but in acromegalics without hypogonadism, increased bone mineral density (BMD) is seen in predominantly cortical bone, and normal BMD in predominantly cancellous bone. Adult patients with growth hormone deficiency have decreased bone mineral content and BMD. GH therapy rapidly increases bone formation and resorption markers. During the first 6-12 months of therapy, declined or unchanged BMD is found in the femoral neck and lumbar spine. All GH trials with a duration of two years or more show enhanced femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD. In osteoporotic patients, GH treatment quickly increases markers for bone formation and resorption. During the first year of treatment, unchanged or decreased BMD values are found, whereas longer treatment periods report enhanced or unchanged BMD values. However, existing trials comprising relatively few patients and limited treatment periods do not allow final conclusions to be drawn regarding the effects of GH on osteoporosis during long-term treatment.     

Cardiovascular effects of growth hormone treatment: potential risks and benefits

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I are involved in heart development and in maintaining cardiac structure and performance. Cardiovascular disease has been reported to reduce life expectancy both in GH deficiency (GHD) and in GH excess. Patients with GHD suffer from abnormalities of left ventricular performance, i.e. reduced diastolic filling and impaired response to peak exercise. Patients with GHD also have increased intima-media thickness at the common carotid arteries, associated with a higher occurrence of atherosclerotic plaques, which may further aggravate the haemodynamic conditions. This may contribute to increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. These cardiovascular abnormalities can be reversed, at least partially, with GH replacement therapy. In recent years, GH therapy has been used to increase cardiac mass in ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, but the results have produced contradictory data.     

The effects of growth hormone deficiency and growth hormone replacement therapy on bone. A meeting report

Recently, several reports have described the effects of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) on bone and the associated potential benefits of GH therapy. Not all of these reports have, however, been consistent and the results are debated. Some of the contention surrounding this issue reflects disagreement about which bone parameters are the best indicators of bone strength and fracture risk. In November 1999, a meeting was held in Taormina, Italy, to discuss the assessment of bone in patients with GHD and the effects of GH therapy on the skeleton. The participants included endocrinologists, orthopaedists and biophysicists from around the world. During the meeting, the advantages and disadvantages of the various indicators of bone strength were defined. In considering GH therapy, the delegates agreed that it had beneficial effects on bone in adults with GHD, but that further studies were needed in GH-deficient children. Finally, the participants stressed the need for more data to clarify which indicator of bone strength is the most appropriate to use in adults and children with GHD, and to define fully the role of GH therapy in bone metabolism. It was recognized that pharmacoepidemiological surveys, such as KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database) and KIMS (Pharmacia International Metabolic Database), are valuable sources of such data, and are, therefore, important in the development of evidence-based medicine.     

Neurocognitive function in adults with growth hormone deficiency

The clinical condition of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) as a consequence of pituitary or hypothalamic disease has been associated with reduced cognitive performance. In several studies, neuropsychological assessment has been performed in adults with GHD both before and after growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy. Interpretation of the available data is complicated by the variation in patient selection as well as the neuropsychological tests used in such studies. Most of the available studies indicate that GHD can lead to small, but clinically relevant changes in memory, processing speed and attention. Some of these changes may be reversed by GH replacement, although the number of reliable intervention studies is limited. In addition to the possible clinical relevance of neuropsychological improvement following GH replacement in patients with GHD, the observed findings may be of interest for studies in neurocognitive performance in other conditions associated with changes in the activity of the somatotrophic axis, and in the understanding of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.     

Cardiovascular disease and risk factors: the role of growth hormone

Clinical studies in patients with acromegaly have shown that growth hormone (GH) exerts both short- and long-term effects on the structure and function of the heart. Moreover, chronic growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been associated with impaired cardiac performance, low heart rate and impaired left ventricular systolic function. Exercise capacity in patients with GHD is significantly reduced and in some severely affected individuals, dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure has been reported. GHD has also been associated with a number of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Altered lipoprotein metabolism and elevated fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity are associated with GHD, and the risk of hypertension is increased in GH-deficient men. Subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat mass have also been found to be abnormally high in these patients. These effects may contribute to an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease. GH is therefore an important factor in the development and function of the cardiovascular system. In this paper, the effects of GH on the physiological mechanisms of the cardiovascular system are discussed, including the effect of GHD on cardiovascular disease risk. We will also discuss the effects of long-term GH replacement therapy in this patient population.     

Defining growth hormone status in adults with hypopituitarism

The identification of adults with severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is not straightforward. The insulin tolerance test remains the gold standard diagnostic test, although other stimuli such as GH-releasing hormone-arginine are gaining acceptance. Insulin-like growth factor-I has a poor diagnostic sensitivity in adult-onset GHD, but is more useful in the subgroup of adults with childhood-onset GHD. Therapeutic developments include increasing recognition of the need to continue GH therapy beyond final height in young adults with severe GHD on retesting. Consensus guidelines have provided a useful algorithm to identify individuals requiring retesting and the number of tests needed. The concept of partial GHD, recognized by paediatric endocrinologists for many years, is being examined in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. Preliminary evidence suggests that this entity is associated with metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities intermediate between those in severe GHD and in healthy controls. It remains to be seen whether this subgroup will derive benefit from GH therapy. To date, therapeutic benefits of GH have been demonstrated only in adults with severe GHD. It is, therefore, imperative that these individuals are unequivocally identified; the diagnosis becomes more uncertain in the presence of obesity, increasing age, and in the absence of additional pituitary hormone deficits.     

Sex steroids and the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I axis in adults

In healthy adults insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels do not differ between males and females, whereas spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion is approximately twofold higher in females. Untreated GH-deficient (GHD) women exhibit lower IGF-I levels compared with men and the increase in serum IGF-I during GH replacement is also significantly less. These data suggest a resistance to GH in women, which in healthy subjects is compensated for by increased GH secretion. Administration of oral oestrogen in healthy postmenopausal women suppresses hepatic IGF-I production and increases pituitary GH release, and oral oestrogen replacement in women with GHD lowers IGF-I concentrations and increases the amount of GH necessary to achieve IGF-I target levels during treatment. These data clearly suggest that hepatic suppression of IGF-I production by oestrogen subserves the gender difference in GH sensitivity, but it is also likely that sex steroids may interact with the GH/IGF axis at other levels. There is also circumstantial evidence to indicate that testosterone stimulates IGF-I production and it is speculated that a certain threshold level of androgens is essential to ensure hepatic IGF-I production. Whether these data should translate into earlier discontinuation of oestrogen replacement therapy in women with hypopituitarism merits consideration.     

The phenotype of adults with partial growth hormone deficiency

The concept of partial growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is well established within the paediatric setting having been validated against height velocity. In hypopituitary adults, GHD is defined by a peak GH response <3 microg/l to stimulation. This cut-off is arbitrary due to the lack of a biological marker equivalent of height velocity. The majority of normal adults achieve peak GH levels several fold higher than this cut off during stimulation. It can be argued, therefore, that there is a cohort of hypopituitary adults with intermediate peak GH values (3-7 microg/l), who have relatively impaired GH secretion, and for whom the impact of this partial GHD (GH insufficiency, GHI) on biological endpoints is not known. Studies of GHI adults have demonstrated an abnormal body composition, adverse lipid profile, impaired cardiac performance, reduced exercise tolerance and insulin resistance. The severity of these abnormalities lies between GHD adults and normal subjects. Whether these anomalies translate into increased mortality, as observed in GHD hypopituitary adults, is not yet known. Given the presence of similar sequelae in GHI and GHD adults, and the improvements during GH replacement in GHD adults, a randomized placebo-controlled study of GH replacement in GHI patients is warranted.     

Insulin sensitivity in adults with growth hormone deficiency and effect of growth hormone treatment

Adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a multifactorial disorder in which pituitary dysfunction associated with pituitary adenomas or their treatment plays a major role. The introduction of recombinant growth hormone (GH) for the treatment of GHD has opened up new treatment avenues but has also raised concerns about possible untoward long-term metabolic effects of GH, such as the potential effect of GH on insulin sensitivity and a deterioration in glucose tolerance. Research has shown that GH induces insulin resistance by the stimulation of lipolysis and a concomitant switch from oxidation of glucose to oxidation of lipids, during both acute and chronic treatment. However, although this is a consistent effect of GH therapy, it does not mean per se that it leads to abnormal glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. This article discusses this and other potential long-term metabolic effects of GH, and raises a number of questions to be addressed by future research.     

Effect of growth hormone replacement therapy on pituitary hormone secretion and hormone replacement therapies in GHD adults

OBJECTIVE: We tested the impact of commencement of GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient (GHD) adults on the circulating levels of other anterior pituitary and peripheral hormones and the need for re-evaluation of other hormone replacement therapies, especially the need for dose changes. METHODS: 22 GHD patients were investigated in a double-blind randomized study and 90 GHD patients in an open study at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of GH replacement therapy. RESULTS: In the placebo-controlled trial, the FT(3) levels increased after 6 months in the GH-treated group, and in the open study the FT(3) levels tended to increase. Other hormone concentrations did not change in either part of the study. Four patients required an increase in thyroxine dose, while 2 patients needed dose reduction. One originally euthyroid patient required thyroxine replacement. Two patients with originally conserved pituitary-adrenal function developed ACTH insufficiency. The hydrocortisone dose was increased in 1 and decreased in 1 of the 66 patients with secondary hypocortisolism. None of the females required any adjustment of sex hormone replacement therapy. Two of 37 males needed dose increase of testosterone, while 1 needed dose reduction. CONCLUSION: GH replacement therapy required dose adjustments regarding other hormone replacement therapies in 12.2% (n = 11), while initiation of new hormone replacement was performed in 3.3% (n = 3) of the 90 patients during the 1-year follow-up. Monitoring of pituitary hormone axes is advisable after commencement of GH replacement therapy, since changes of hormone replacement therapy was observed in a small but clinically significant number of patients.     

Response to long-term growth hormone therapy in short children with reduced GH bioactivity

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether short children with normal growth hormone (GH) immunoreactivity, but reduced bioactivity (bioinactive GH) could benefit from rhGH treatment as GH deficient (GHD) patients. Methods: We evaluated 12 pre-pubertal children (8 M, 4 F), with GH deficiency-like phenotype showing normal serum GH peak levels (>10 ng/ml), measured by immunofluorimetric assay (IFMA-GH), in contrast with a reduced GH bioactivity (bio-GH), evaluated using the Nb(2) cells. We also evaluated 15 age-matched GHD pre-pubertal children (11 M, 4 F) with serum GH peak <5 ng/ml. Both groups were treated with rhGH therapy at the dose of 0.23 mg/kg/week s.c. RESULTS: Serum bio-GH/IFMA-GH ratio at peak time for each patient during the provocative test was significantly lower in bioinactive GH than in GHD children (0.29 vs. 2.05, p = 0.00001). Recombinant human GH therapy induced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in growth rate in both groups during the first 2 years. In the third year of treatment, while growth rate in GHD children is maintained, in bioinactive GH patients it decreases remaining, however higher compared to the pre-treatment one. CONCLUSIONS: Short rhGH therapy given to selected bioinactive GH children improve growth rate and might result in greater final adult height.