DNA polymerase III from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Inhibitor studies and comparison with DNA polymerases I and II

The newly identified yeast DNA polymerase III was compared to DNA polymerases I and II and the mitochondrial DNA polymerase. Inhibition by aphidicolin (I50) of DNA polymerases I, II, and III was 4, 6, and 0.6 micrograms/ml, respectively. The mitochondrial enzyme was insensitive to the drug. N2-(p-n-butylphenyl)-2'-deoxyguanosine 5'-triphosphate strongly inhibited DNA polymerase I (I50 = 0.3 microM), whereas DNA polymerase III was less sensitive (I50 = 80 microM). Conditions that allowed proteolysis to proceed during the preparation of extracts converted DNA polymerase II from a sensitive form (I50 = 2.4 microM) to a resistant form (I50 = 2 mM). The mitochondrial DNA polymerase is insensitive (I50 greater than 5 mM). With most other inhibitors tested (N-ethylmaleimide, heparin, salt) only small differences were observed between the three nuclear DNA polymerases. Polyclonal antibodies to DNA polymerase III did not inhibit DNA polymerases I and II, nor were those polymerases recognized by Western blotting. Monoclonal antibodies to DNA polymerase I did not crossreact with DNA polymerases II and III. The results show that DNA polymerase III is distinct from DNA polymerase I and II.     

Deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases of BHK-21/C13 cells. Partial purification and characterization of the enzymes.

DNA polymerase from BHK-21/C13 cells were separated into two species, DNA polymerase I corresponding to the heterogeneous enzyme with sedimentation coefficient of 6-8S, and DNA polymerase II, corresponding to the enzyme with sedimentation coefficient of 3.3S. DNA polymerase I was purified 114-fold and DNA polymerase II 154-fold by a simple extraction procedure followed by column chromatography on phosphocellulose and gel filtration through Sephadex G-100. The purified enzymes differed markedly in respect of pH optimum, stimulation and inhibition by K+, Km for the deoxyribonucleoside 5'-triphosphates, stability to heating at 45 degrees C, and inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide. The preferred primer-template for both enzymes was "activated" DNA (DNA submitted to limited degradation by pancreatic deoxyribonuclease); native or thermally denatured DNA templates were relatively very poorly copied. When certain synthetic templates were tested, substantial differences were revealed between the two enzymes. Poly[d(A-T)] was poorly used by polymerase I but was superior to "activated" DNA for polymerase II. Poly[d(A)]-oligo[d(pT)10] was used efficiently by polymerase I but not by polymerase II. Poly(A)-oligo[d(pT)10] was not an effective primer-template although polymerase I could use it to a limited extent when Mn2+ replaced Mg2+ in the polymerase reaction and when the temperature of incubation was lowered from 37 degrees to 30 degrees C. When only one or two or three triphosphates were supplied in the reaction mixture, the activity of polymerase I was more severly diminished than that of polymerase II.     

Isolation of the gene encoding yeast DNA polymerase I

A yeast genomic DNA expression library in lambda gt11 antibody prepared against yeast DNA polymerase I were used to isolate the gene encoding DNA polymerase I. The identity of the DNA polymerase I gene was determined by several criteria. First, the clone-encoded protein is immunologically related to DNA polymerase I. Second, cells containing the gene cloned in the high copy number plasmid YEp24 overproduce the polymerase activity 4- to 5-fold as measured in yeast extracts. Finally, insertion of the gene downstream from a bacteriophage T7 promoter allows synthesis of yeast DNA polymerase I in Escherichia coli. Gene disruption and Southern hybridization experiments show that the polymerase is encoded by an essential, single copy gene. Examination of the germinated spores containing the disrupted gene reveals a defect in nuclear division and a terminal phenotype typical of replication mutants.     

Contrasting effects of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein on synthesis by T7 DNA polymerase and Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (large fragment). Evidence that binding protein inhibits trans-lesion synthesis by polymerase I

The effect of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) on DNA synthesis by T7 DNA polymerase and E. coli DNA polymerase I (large fragment) using native or aminofluorene-modified M13 templates was evaluated by in vitro DNA synthesis assays and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. The two polymerase enzymes displayed differential responses to the addition of SSB. T7 DNA polymerase, a enzyme required for the replication of the T7 chromosome, was stimulated by the addition of SSB whether native or modified templates were used. On the other hand, E. coli DNA polymerase I was slightly stimulated by the addition of SSB to the native template but substantially inhibited on modified templates. This result suggests that DNA polymerase I may be able to synthesize past an aminofluorene adduct but that the presence of SSB inhibited this trans-lesion synthesis. Polyacrylamide gels of the products of DNA synthesis by polymerase I supported this inference since SSB caused a substantial increase in the accumulation of shorter DNA chains induced by blockage at the aminofluorene adduct sites.     

Accuracy of Deoxynucleotide Incorporation by Soybean Chloroplast DNA Polymerases Is Independent of the Presence of a 3[prime] to 5[prime] Exonuclease

DNA polymerase was purified from soybean (Glycine max) chloroplasts that were actively replicating DNA. The main form (form I) of the enzyme was associated with a low level of 3[prime] to 5[prime] exonuclease activity throughout purification, although the ratio of exonuclease to polymerase activity decreased with each successive purification step. A second form (form II) of DNA polymerase, which elutes from DEAE-cellulose at a higher salt concentration than form I, was devoid of any exonuclease activity. To assess the potential function of the 3[prime] to 5[prime] exonuclease in proofreading, the fidelity of deoxynucleotide incorporation was measured for form I DNA polymerase throughout purification. Despite the steadily decreasing ratio of 3[prime] to 5[prime] exonuclease to polymerase activity, the extent of misincorporation by form I enzyme remained unchanged during the final purification steps, suggesting that the exonuclease did not contribute to the accuracy of DNA synthesis by this polymerase. Fidelity of form I DNA polymerase, when compared with that of form II, revealed a higher level of misincorporation for form I enzyme, a finding that is consistent with the exonuclease playing little or no role in exonucleolytic proofreading.     

DNA polymerase III, a second essential DNA polymerase, is encoded by the S. cerevisiae CDC2 gene

Three nuclear DNA polymerases have been described in yeast: DNA polymerases I, II, and III. DNA polymerase I is encoded by the POL1 gene and is essential for DNA replication. Since the S. cerevisiae CDC2 gene has recently been shown to have DNA sequence similarity to the active site regions of other known DNA polymerases, but to nevertheless be different from DNA polymerase I, we examined cdc2 mutants for the presence of DNA polymerases II and III. DNA polymerase II was not affected by the cdc2 mutation. DNA polymerase III activity was significantly reduced in the cdc2-1 cell extracts. We conclude that the CDC2 gene encodes yeast DNA polymerase III and that DNA polymerase III, therefore, represents a second essential DNA polymerase in yeast.     

DNA polymerase I is required for premeiotic DNA replication and sporulation but not for X-ray repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We have used a set of seven temperature-sensitive mutants in the DNA polymerase I gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to investigate the role of DNA polymerase I in various aspects of DNA synthesis in vivo. Previously, we showed that DNA polymerase I is required for mitotic DNA replication. Here we extend our studies to several stages of meiosis and repair of X-ray-induced damage. We find that sporulation is blocked in all of the DNA polymerase temperature-sensitive mutants and that premeiotic DNA replication does not occur. Commitment to meiotic recombination is only 2% of wild-type levels. Thus, DNA polymerase I is essential for these steps. However, repair of X-ray-induced single-strand breaks is not defective in the DNA polymerase temperature-sensitive mutants, and DNA polymerase I is therefore not essential for repair of such lesions. These results suggest that DNA polymerase II or III or both, the two other nuclear yeast DNA polymerases for which roles have not yet been established, carry out repair in the absence of DNA polymerase I, but that DNA polymerase II and III cannot compensate for loss of DNA polymerase I in meiotic replication and recombination. These results do not, however, rule out essential roles for DNA polymerase II or III or both in addition to that for DNA polymerase I.     

Purification and characterization of two new high molecular weight forms of DNA polymerase delta

Two high molecular weight DNA polymerases, which we have designated delta I and delta II, have been purified from calf thymus tissue. Using Bio Rex-70, DEAE-Sephadex A-25, and DNA affinity resin chromatography followed by sucrose gradient sedimentation, we purified DNA polymerase delta I 1400-fold to a specific activity of 10 000 nmol of nucleotide incorporated h-1 mg-1, and DNA polymerase delta II was purified 4100-fold to a final specific activity of 30 000 nmol of nucleotide incorporated h-1 mg-1. The native molecular weights of DNA polymerase delta I and DNA polymerase delta II are 240 000 and 290 000, respectively. Both enzymes have similarities to other purified delta-polymerases previously reported in their ability to degrade single-stranded DNA in a 3' to 5' direction, affinity for an AMP-hexane-agarose matrix, high activity on poly(dA) X oligo(dT) template, and relative resistance to the polymerase alpha inhibitors N2-(p-n-butylphenyl)dATP and N2-(p-n-butylphenyl)dGTP. These two forms of DNA polymerase delta also share several common features with alpha-type DNA polymerases. Both calf DNA polymerase delta I and DNA polymerase delta II are similar to calf DNA polymerase alpha in molecular weight, are inhibited by the alpha-polymerase inhibitors N-ethylmaleimide and aphidicolin, contain an active DNA-dependent RNA polymerase or primase activity, display a similar extent of processive DNA synthesis, and are stimulated by millimolar concentrations of ATP. We propose that calf DNA polymerase delta I, which also has a template specificity essentially identical with that of calf DNA polymerase alpha, could be an exonuclease-containing form of a DNA replicative enzyme.     

News & Notes: Primary Structure of the DNA Polymerase I Gene of an α-Proteobacterium, Rhizobium leguminosarum, and Comparison with Other Family A DNA Polymerases

The structural gene for DNA polymerase I of Rhizobium leguminosarum was determined. The rhizobium DNA polymerase I consists of 1016 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular weight of 111,491 Dalton. The amino acid sequence comparison with E. coli DNA polymerase I, Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I, and Rickettsia prowazekii DNA polymerase I showed that, although 5′-nuclease and DNA polymerase domains are highly conserved, 3′ to 5′ exonuclease domains are much less conserved. While both R. leguminosarum and R. prowazekii belong to the alpha subdivision of the Proteobacteria on the basis of 16S ribosomal RNA phylogeny, the primary structure of the DNA polymerase I is quite different; the rhizobium DNA polymerase I has 3′ to 5′ proofreading exonuclease, but the rickettsia DNA polymerase I does not. Received: 15 December 1998 / Accepted: 2 February 1999     

Purification of DNA polymerase II, a distinct DNA polymerase, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast DNA polymerases I and III have been well characterized physically, biochemically, genetically and immunologically. DNA polymerase II is present in very small amounts, and only partially purified preparations have been available for characterization, making comparison with DNA polymerases I and III difficult. Recently, we have shown that DNA polymerases II and III are genetically distinct (Sitney et al., 1989). In this work, we show that polymerase II is also genetically distinct from polymerase I, since polymerase II can be purified in equal amounts from wild-type and mutant strains completely lacking DNA polymerase I activity. Thus, yeast contains three major nuclear DNA polymerases. The core catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase II was purified to near homogeneity using a reconstitution assay. Two factors that stimulate the core polymerase were identified and used to monitor activity during purification and analysis. The predominant species of the most highly purified preparation of polymerase II is 132,000 Da. However, polymerase activity gels suggest that the 132,000-Da form of DNA polymerase II is probably an active proteolytic fragment derived from a 170,000-Da protein. The highly purified polymerase fractions contain a 3'----5'-exonuclease activity that purifies at a constant ratio with polymerase during the final two purification steps. However, DNA polymerase II does not copurify with a DNA primase activity.     

Dexyribonucleic acid polymerases of BHK-21/C13cells. Relationship to the physiological state of the cells, and to synchronous indution of synthesis of deoxyribonuleic acid.

BHK-21/C13 cells were grown in culture under conditions that provided exponentially growing cells and quiescent cells, by modifying the concentration of serum in the growth medium. The high-molecular-weight DNA polymerase (DNA polymerase I) from exponentially growing cells accounted for 90% of the total polymerase activity; the low-molecular-weight DNA polymerase (DNA polymerase II) accounted for the remaining 10%. In quiescent cells, DNA polymerase I contributed only 39% of the total polymerase activity and DNA polymerase II 61%. The total amount of DNA polymerase I in exponentially growing cells was 11.3-fold greater than that in quiescent cells, whereas the amount of DNA polymerase II appeared to be relatively independent of the physiological state of the cells. In an extension of these experiments, cells in a quiescent state (Go cells) were stimulated by the 'serum-step-up' method of Burk (1970) to grow and to enter a synchronous wave of DNA synthesis (S-phase cells), 87% of the cells synthesizing DNA at 20 h after the 'serum-step-up'. During the synchrony experiment, the total cytoplasmic and total nuclear DNA polymerase activities each increased about 4-fold in parallel with the increase in the rate of DNA synthesis. Cytoplasmic polymerase activity was always greater than nuclear polymerase activity. The increases observed were maximal at 20 h after 'serum step-up'. By 26 h, there was a decrease in enzyme activity (8% for cytoplasmic polymerase and 16% for nuclear polymerase, both relative to the maximum at 20 h), but the rate of DNA synthesis had declined by 37% relative to the maximum at 20 h. In Go cells, DNA polymerase II (mol.wt. 46000 +/- 4000) was the predominant species, there being twice as much of it as of the total DNA polymerase I. In these cells there was little DNA polymerase IC and ID; the amounts of IA (mol.wt. 900 times 10(3)-1100 times 10(3)) and IB (mol.wt. 460 times 10(3)-560 times 10(3)) were about equal but small.     

DNA replication defect in Salmonella typhimurium mutants lacking the editing (epsilon) subunit of DNA polymerase III.

In Salmonella typhimurium, dnaQ null mutants (encoding the epsilon editing subunit of DNA polymerase III [Pol III]) exhibit a severe growth defect when the genetic background is otherwise wild type. Suppression of the growth defect requires both a mutation affecting the alpha (polymerase) subunit of DNA polymerase III and adequate levels of DNA polymerase I. In the present paper, we report on studies that clarify the nature of the physiological defect imposed by the loss of epsilon and the mechanism of its suppression. Unsuppressed dnaQ mutants exhibited chronic SOS induction, indicating exposure of single-stranded DNA in vivo, most likely as gaps in double-stranded DNA. Suppression of the growth defect was associated with suppression of SOS induction. Thus, Pol I and the mutant Pol III combined to reduce the formation of single-stranded DNA or accelerate its maturation to double-stranded DNA. Studies with mutants in major DNA repair pathways supported the view that the defect in DNA metabolism in dnaQ mutants was at the level of DNA replication rather than of repair. The requirement for Pol I was satisfied by alleles of the gene for Pol I encoding polymerase activity or by rat DNA polymerase beta (which exhibits polymerase activity only). Consequently, normal growth is restored to dnaQ mutants when sufficient polymerase activity is provided and this compensatory polymerase activity can function independently of Pol III. The high level of Pol I polymerase activity may be required to satisfy the increased demand for residual DNA synthesis at regions of single-stranded DNA generated by epsilon-minus pol III. The emphasis on adequate polymerase activity in dnaQ mutants is also observed in the purified alpha subunit containing the suppressor mutation, which exhibits a modestly elevated intrinsic polymerase activity relative to that of wild-type alpha.     

Conformation of DNA-DNA polymerase I complex observed by scanning tunneling microscopy.

The conformation of a complex of a 41 mer/31 mer DNA fragment and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli was studied by scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM). The results shows that near two turns of double helix of this DNA fragment was outside of enzyme while another part containing more than one turn of helix and 10 nucleotides single strand was combined with enzyme. The dimension and shape of DNA polymerase I (KF) in complex were different from that of free enzyme. The conformation of DNA-DNA polymerase I (KF) complex and the application of STM in studying structure of complex of DNA polymerase with DNA were discussed.     

DNA polymerase I and DNA primase complex in yeast

Chromatographic analysis of poly(dT) replication activity in fresh yeast extracts showed that the activities required co-fractionate with the yeast DNA polymerase I. Since poly(dT) replication requires both a primase and a DNA polymerase, the results of the fractionation studies suggest that these two enzymes might exist as a complex in the yeast extract. Sucrose gradient analysis of concentrated purified yeast DNA polymerase I preparations demonstrates that the yeast DNA polymerase I does sediment as a complex with DNA primase activity. Two DNA polymerase I peptides estimated at 78,000 and 140,000 Da were found in the complex that were absent from the primase-free DNA polymerase fraction. Rabbit anti-yeast DNA polymerase I antibody inhibits DNA polymerase I but not DNA primase although rabbit antibodies are shown to remove DNA primase activity from solution by binding to the complex. Mouse monoclonal antibody to yeast DNA polymerase I binds to free yeast DNA polymerase I as well as the complex, but not to the free DNA primase activity. These results suggest that these two activities exist as a complex and reside on the different polypeptides. Replication of poly(dT) and single-stranded circular phage DNA by yeast DNA polymerase I and primase requires ATP and dNTPs. The size of the primer produced is 8 to 9 nucleotides in the presence of dNTPs and somewhat larger in the absence of dNTPs. Aphidicolin, an inhibitor of yeast DNA polymerase I, is not inhibitory to the yeast DNA primase activity. The primase activity is inhibited by adenosine 5'-(3-thio)tri-phosphate but not by alpha-amanitin. The association of yeast DNA polymerase I and yeast DNA primase can be demonstrated directly by isolation of the complex on a column containing yeast DNA polymerase I mouse monoclonal antibody covalently linked to Protein A-Sepharose. Both DNA polymerase I and DNA primase activities are retained by the column and can be eluted with 3.5 M MgCl2. Part of the primase activity can be dissociated from DNA polymerase on the column with 1 M MgCl2 and this free primase activity can be detected as poly(dT) replication activity in the presence of Escherichia coli polymerase I.     

Changes in deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase activities in synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis.

The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerase activities in Bacillus subtilis strains Marburg 168 (thy-trp2) and D22, a DNA polymerase I-deficient mutant, were measured at various stages of sporulation. The DNA polymerase I activity, which had decreased after the exponential growth, began to increase at the early stage of sporulation, reached a maximum and then again decreased. The activity of neither DNA polymerase II nor III was observed to change so drastically as that of DNA polymerase I during sporulation. The incorporation of [3H]deoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate ([3H]dTTP) into Brij 58-treated permeable cells increased during sporulation. The stimulation of [3H]dTTP incorporation into the cells by irradiation with ultraviolet light was also observed to coincide with DNA polymerase I activity. In strain D22 the activities of DNA polymerase II and III were almost constant with time. Neither change of [3H]dTTP incorporation into Brij 58-treated cells nor stimulation of incorporation by irradiation with ultraviolet light was observed.     

Influence of cationic triphenylmethane dyes upon DNA polymerization and product hydrolysis by Escherichia coli polymerase I.

The cationic triphenylmethane dyes crystal violet, methyl green, and malachite green inhibited DNA synthesis catalyzed by Escherichia coli B polymerase I (polymerase I). Lower concentrations of the dyes inhibited DNA replication as a direct function of the proportion of AT to GC in the DNA of Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, and Micrococcus lysodeikticus. When the intercalant proflavin was employed, the GC-rich micrococcal DNA was most severely inhibited. In addition, both the triphenylmethanes and proflavin inhibited product hydrolysis catalyzed by polymerase I.