Effects of differential alcohol dehydrogenase activity on the developmental toxicity of ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster

The role of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity in ethanol toxicity was investigated in Drosophila melanogaster. Flies from three congenic Adh strains (high, medium, and low ADH activity) were allowed to deposit eggs on medium containing 0, 4, or 8% ethanol. The resulting larvae were allowed to complete their development in the medium, and emerging flies were examined for defects. Flies with high ADH activity had malformation incidences of 0.8, 2.4, and 5.2% at 0, 4, and 8% ethanol, respectively. The comparable incidences for the low ADH strain were 1.0, 4.1, and 8.4%, while those for the medium ADH strain were intermediate in value. These results indicate that ethanol teratogenesis may be inversely related to ADH activity. When larvae were treated with ethanol for different lengths of time during development, the incidence of defects in flies from the high ADH strain was 3.9% when exposure started at the first instar and 3.09% when exposure started at the third instar. Results of the same exposures for the intermediate ADH strain were 5.2 and 3.4%, respectively, while those for the low ADH strain were 6.9 and 5.5%, respectively. Thus, length of ethanol exposure was directly related to the increased incidence of malformations in all tested Drosophila strains. For all tested strains, defect incidences appeared to be dose-related as well, regardless of length of exposure. ADH in Drosophila has a dual function and thus can catalyze oxidation of both ethanol and its toxic metabolite, acetaldehyde. This suggests that ethanol is the proximate teratogen in Drosophila.     

Conditioning to ethanol in the fruit fly-a study using an inhibitor of ADH

To identify processes involved in the choice of ethanol by adult Drosophila, flies homozygous Adh(F), reared in the absence of alcohol were placed in contact with: a) an ethanol-free medium, b) a medium containing ethanol, c) a medium supplemented with 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP, an inhibitor of the ADH pathway), d) a medium containing ethanol and 4-MP. The choice of ethanol over a medium without ethanol was evaluated by measuring the duration of extension of the proboscis of the flies in each of the media. A slight preference for the ethanol-supplemented medium was observed in the naive flies, which was enhanced by previous exposure to ethanol. Exposure to ethanol and 4-MP, however, led to an avoidance of ethanol. There was a reduction in ADH activity on treatment of the flies with 4-MP, and signs of malaise (reduced locomotor activity, loss of balance) were observed in the flies who ingested both ethanol and inhibitor. We concluded that the preference for ethanol stems from an associative learning related to ethanol utilization. Inhibition of enzymes of ADH pathway led to a conditioned aversion due to disturbance of ethanol metabolism giving rise to malaise.     

Acetaldehyde utilization and toxicity in Drosophila adults lacking alcohol dehydrogenase or aldehyde oxidase

Metabolic utilization and toxicity of acetaldehyde were studied in flies lacking alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde oxidase (AO), or both functions. Prior to the experiments, mutant alleles Adhn4 and mal were transferred to the same genetic background by 10 successive backcrosses. By comparison with wild-type flies, various deleterious, pleiotropic effects could be attributed to the mal allele but not to Adhn4. Of the four genotypes studied (mal, Adhn4, mal Adhn4, and wild), all were able to use acetaldehyde as a resource in a similar way. In spite of its high toxicity, acetaldehyde appeared a better resource than ethanol. Flies treated with intermediate acetaldehyde concentrations (around 0.5%) exhibited a very high interindividual heterogeneity which could reflect a physiological adaptation occurring as a consequence of the aldehyde treatment. Toxicity tests showed that ADH-negative flies were more sensitive to acetaldehyde than wild type, but this is most likely explained by the transformation of the aldehyde into alcohol. Our results show that the aldehyde metabolizing enzyme (AME) system in Drosophila is neither ADH nor AO. The existence of an aldehyde dehydrogenase is plausible.     

Experimental reduction of codon bias in the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene results in decreased ethanol tolerance of adult flies

The ethanol tolerance of adult transgenic flies of Drosophila containing between zero and ten unpreferred synonymous mutations that reduced codon bias in the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene was assayed. As the amino acid sequences of the ADH protein were identical in the four genotypes assayed, differences in ethanol tolerance were due to differences in the abundance of ADH protein, presumably driven by the effects of codon bias on translational efficiency. The ethanol tolerance of genotypes decreased with the number of unpreferred synonymous mutations, and a positive correlation between ADH protein abundance and ethanol tolerance was observed. This work confirms that the fitness effects of unpreferred synonymous mutations that reduce codon bias in a highly expressed gene are experimentally measurable in Drosophila melanogaster.     

The ADH gene-enzyme system and the fitness of Drosophila melanogaster mutants]

Physico-chemical properties of ADH and some fitness parameters were examined in two mutant (cn and vg) and two wild-type (C-S and D) strains of Drosophila melanogaster. It was shown that, under the experimental conditions, longevity, fecundity and heat resistance did not depend on the activity and the electrophoretic mobility of enzymes. The Adh gene-enzyme system of the mutants was analyzed in relation to the saturation of their genotypes with genes of wild-type flies having different allelic control of the enzyme. ADH activity was shown to be positively correlated with the frequency of F allele of the structural gene (r = 0.84), whereas thermostability of the enzyme was not associated with electrophoretic mobility. Low thermostability of ADH in vg mutants, which was correlated with low heat resistance (r = 0.94), is assumed to be controlled by the thermostable allele Adh Fs.     

Effects on ADH activity and distribution, following selection for tolerance to ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster.

Strains of Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for either the AdhF or the AdhS allele were kept on food supplemented with ethanol for 20 generations. These strains (FE and SE) were tested for tolerance to ethanol and compared with control strains (FN and SN). The E strains showed increased tolerance to ethanol both in the adult and in the juvenile life stages. In adults the increase in tolerance was not accompanied by an increase in overall ADH activity. However, there were changes in the distribution of ADH over the body parts. Flies of the FE strain possessed significantly more ADH in the abdomen, compared with FN. Another set of FN and SN populations were started both on standard food and on ethanol food with reduced yeast concentrations. After 9 months ADH activities were determined in flies from these populations which had been placed on three different media: the food the populations had been kept on, regular food and regular food supplemented with ethanol. The phenotypic effects of yeast reduction on ADH activity were considerably, but longterm genetic effects were limited.     

Comparison of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene expression was analyzed in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species D. simulans. The levels of ADH activity, ADH-cross-reacting material (CRM), and ADH-mRNA were analyzed for several strains of each species, which derive from diverse geographic locations around the world. There is considerable quantitative variation in ADH activity, CRM level, and RNA level among strains within species at all developmental stages. However, the only consistent differences between the two species are in pupal RNA level and in late-adult activity and CRM level. Late-adult melanogaster flies that are homozygous for the Slow allozyme have approximately twice the level of ADH activity and CRM as do simulans flies. The regression of activity on CRM over strains is highly significant and essentially the same for each species, which means that most, if not all, of the activity difference between the species is due to a difference in concentration of the ADH protein. In contrast, there is no significant regression of CRM level on mRNA level in adults of either species; nor is there a significant difference in RNA level between species. Therefore, the difference in ADH protein concentration is not due to RNA template availability. Thus, the interspecific difference in ADH level in adults must be due either to a difference in the rate of translation of the two RNAs or to a difference in protein stability.     

Molecular consequences of two formaldehyde-induced mutations in the alcohol dehydrogenase gene ofDrosophila melanogaster

Adhfn23 and Adhfn24 are two formaldehyde-induced, homozygous-viable, alcohol dehydrogenase-null mutants that bear lesions in the gene that codes for the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH; EC 1.1.1.1) of Drosophila melanogaster. Adhfn23 contains a 34-base pair deletion in the C-terminal coding region of the alcohol dehydrogenase structural gene. By immunological and molecular analysis, we show that the deletion shifts the translation reading frame and results in a prematurely truncated polypeptide product (10 amino acids shorter than wild type) that cross-reacts with antibody raised against ADH. The steady-state level of alcohol dehydrogenase mRNA present in this mutant is close (97%) to that in the wild type, but the steady-state level of alcohol dehydrogenase-like protein is 50% lower. Moreover, the rate of alcohol dehydrogenase synthesis in Adhfn23 flies is reduced to 60% of that found in the wild type. Hence both the rate of synthesis and the rate of degradation of alcohol dehydrogenase are affected. In contrast, Adhfn24 which contains an 11-base pair deletion in the N-terminal coding region of the ADH gene, synthesizes no immunodetectable protein, and the amount of alcohol dehydrogenase mRNA is less than half that of wild-type flies. As with Adhfn23, the deletion in Adhfn24 results in a change in the reading frame. Unlike Adhfn23, however, nucleic acid sequence data indicate that polypeptide chain elongation can proceed for a considerable distance (over 130 amino acids) beyond the deletion. Based upon antigenic binding-site predictions, the resultant aberrant protein (projected 195 amino acids in length) would share few antigenic sites with the alcohol dehydrogenase from the wild type, which may account for the lack of immunoprecipitable material in this mutant. The contrasting effects these two deletions have on the Drosophila ADH mRNA levels and ADH protein levels are discussed.     

A MULTILEVEL APPROACH TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE OF DROSOPHILA

Prior studies showed that differences in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity across genotypes of Drosophila are decisive for the outcome of selection by ethanol. In the present paper, the effect on ADH activity and egg-to-adult survival of combinations of ethanol, propan-2-ol, and acetone in naturally occurring concentrations is examined. Propan-2-ol is converted into acetone by ADH in vitro. Acetone is considered a competitive inhibitor of ethanol for the ADH enzymes. The melanogaster-ADH-S allozyme is two times more sensitive towards inhibition by acetone than either simulans-ADH or melanogaster-ADH-F. The physiological implications of these in vitro differences for larvae were studied in short-term in vivo and long-term exposure experiments. No major differences in acetone accumulation or fitness parameters were found between the strains in response to ecologically relevant concentrations of acetone or propan-2-ol. Ethanol, however, strongly decreased egg-to-pupal survival in both Drosophila simulans strains and increased developmental time in four out of the five strains tested. Therefore, under physiological conditions only ethanol was shown to act as a selective agent on the ADH polymorphism during egg-to-pupa development in Drosophila.     

Variation in amount of enzyme protein in natural populations

Among strains of Drosophila melanogaster each derived from a single fertilized female taken from natural populations, there is variation in both alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity and the amount of ADH protein. The correlation between ADH activity and number of molecules over all strains examined is 0.87 or 0.96 in late third instar larvae depending on whether the substrate is 2-propanol or ethanol. With respect to the two common electrophoretic allozymic forms, F and S, segregating in these populations, the FF strains on the whole have higher ADH activities and numbers of ADH molecules than the SS strains. Over all strains examined, enzyme extracts from FF strains have a mean catalytic efficiency per enzyme molecule higher than that of enzyme extracts from SS strains when ethanol is the substrate, and much higher when 2-propanol is the substrate. One FF strain had an ADH activity/ADH protein ratio characteristic of SS strains.     

In vivo contribution of Class III alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH3) to alcohol metabolism through activation by cytoplasmic solution hydrophobicity

Alcohol metabolism in vivo cannot be explained solely by the action of the classical alcohol dehydrogenase, Class I ADH (ADH1). Over the past three decades, attempts to identify the metabolizing enzymes responsible for the ADH1-independent pathway have focused on the microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOS) and catalase, but have failed to clarify their roles in systemic alcohol metabolism. In this study, we used Adh3-null mutant mice to demonstrate that Class III ADH (ADH3), a ubiquitous enzyme of ancient origin, contributes to alcohol metabolism in vivo dose-dependently resulting in a diminution of acute alcohol intoxication. Although the ethanol oxidation activity of ADH3 in vitro is low due to its very high Km, it was found to exhibit a markedly enhanced catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) toward ethanol when the solution hydrophobicity of the reaction medium was increased with a hydrophobic substance. Confocal laser scanning microscopy with Nile red as a hydrophobic probe revealed a cytoplasmic solution of mouse liver cells to be much more hydrophobic than the buffer solution used for in vitro experiments. So, the in vivo contribution of high-Km ADH3 to alcohol metabolism is likely to involve activation in a hydrophobic solution. Thus, the present study demonstrated that ADH3 plays an important role in systemic ethanol metabolism at higher levels of blood ethanol through activation by cytoplasmic solution hydrophobicity.     

Correct developmental expression of a cloned alcohol dehydrogenase gene transduced into the Drosophila germ line

We have used P-element-mediated transformation to introduce a cloned Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene into the germ line of ADH null flies. Six independent transformants expressing ADH were identified by their acquired resistance to ethanol. Each transformant carries a single copy of the cloned Adh gene in a different chromosomal location. Four of the six transformant lines exhibit normal Adh expression by the following criteria: quantitative levels of ADH enzyme activity in larvae and adults; qualitative tissue specificity; the size of stable Adh mRNA; and the characteristic developmental switch in utilization of two different Adh promoters. The remaining two transformants express ADH enzyme activity with the correct tissue specificity, but at a lower level than wild type. These results demonstrate that an 11.8 kb chromosomal fragment containing the Adh gene includes the cis-acting sequences necessary for its correct developmental expression, and that a variety of chromosomal sites permit proper Adh gene function.     

Alcohol dehydrogenase thermostability variants in Drosophila melanogaster: Comparison of activity ratios and enzyme levels

Representatives of five allozymic classes of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase have been compared with respect to their activity levels on two alcohol substrates, quantities of ADH protein, and stability in crude extracts. Within each allozymic class, strains from widely diverse geographic locations differ in their enzyme activity levels but are identical for a measure known as "activity ratio," which is obtained by dividing the average activity reading on isopropanol by that obtained with ethanol. They are also similar in the rate at which ADH activity declines in crude extracts held at 25 degrees C. For several of the fast-resistant and fast-moderate strains, differences in ADH activity are associated with differences in the amount of enzyme present. The catalytic efficiencies of the fast-resistant forms are considerably lower than those of the fast-moderate allozymes. The origin and persistence of the rare but ubiquitous fast-resistant allozyme is discussed.     

Induction of Suppressed ADH Activity in Drosophila pachea Exposed to Different Alcohols

Laboratory-reared males of the cactophilic Drosophila pachea exhibit a spontaneous and sex-specific suppression of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity within 4 days after eclosion. A lack of ADH activity also is usually seen in wild-caught males, although relatively high activity is always seen in female flies. In the present study we examined the effectiveness of different alcohols and related compounds, including several found naturally in necroses of the host cactus, to induce suppressed ADH activity in wild males of D. pachea and to serve as enzyme substrates. The primary alcohols (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol, and 1-pentanol), and the secondary alcohols (2-propanol and 2-butanol), each induced activity after 24 h exposure, although to different degrees. 1,2-Propanediol was usually effective as an inducer, but 2,3-butanediol usually was ineffective. Little or no induction was seen with 1-octanol, 2-pentanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, or acetaldehyde. Although the compounds tested varied in their ability to function as ADH substrates, methanol was the only alcohol that showed no activity staining. Ethanol induction of ADH activity was apparent after 3-6 h exposure and induced activity decreased dramatically within 1 week of flies being placed in an alcohol-free environment. Ethanol exposure did not induce ADH in adult female D. pachea, or in adult males and females of D. acutilabella in which control males show reduced ADH activity compared to females. The implications of the loss of ADH activity in adult males of D. pachea, as they relate to feeding ecology and fitness, are discussed.     

Effects on ADH activity and distribution,following selection for tolerance to ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster

Strains of Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for either the Adh ^F or the Adh ^S allele were kept on food supplemented with ethanol for 20 generations. These strains (FE and SE) were tested for tolerance to ethanol and compared with control strains (FN and SN). The E strains showed increased tolerance to ethanol both in the adult and in the juvenile life stages. In adults the increase in tolerance was not accompanied by an increase in overall ADH activity. However, there were changes in the distribution of ADH over the body parts. Flies of the FE strain possessed significantly more ADH in the abdomen, compared with FN. Another set of FN and SN populations were started both on standard food and on ethanol food with reduced yeast concentrations. After 9 months ADH activities were determined in flies from these populations which had been placed on three different media: the food the populations had been kept on, regular food and regular food supplemented with ethanol. The phenotypic effects of yeast reduction on ADH activity were considerably, but longterm genetic effects were limited.     

Genetic control of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in Drosophila

Among the progeny of Drosophila flies heterozygous for two noncomplementing Adh-negative alleles, two individuals were found that had recovered appreciable alcohol dehydrogenase activity, thereby surviving the ethanol medium used as a screen. The most likely explanation is that these Adh-positive flies are the product of intracistronic recombination within the Adh locus. Judging by the distribution of outside markers, one of the crossovers would have been a conventional reciprocal exchange while the other appears to have been an instance of nonreciprocal recombination. The enzymes produced in strains derived from the original survivors can be easily distinguished from wild-type enzymes ADH-S and ADH-F on the basis of their sensitivity to denaturing agents. None of various physical and catalytic properties tested revealed differences between the enzymes of the survivor strains except that in one of them the level of activity is 55–65% of the other. Quantitative immunological determinations of ADH gave estimates of enzyme protein which are proportional to the measured activity levels. These results are interpreted to indicate that different amounts of ADH protein are being accumulated in the two strains.This work was supported in part by NSF Grant PCM 76-19563.     

Acetic acid tolerance in Drosophila is a prerequisite for ethanol tolerance

Acetic acid tolerance compared with ethanol tolerance of Drosophila simulans and six Drosophila melanogaster strains shows a curvilinear relation with apparent asymptotic hyperbolic profile. The upper limit of acetic acid tolerance is lower than that for ethanol. We compared strains which had pairwise identical alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) coding regions but different genetic backgrounds. A positive regression existed for ethanol tolerance on ADH activity. Adh-null mutants with very low ethanol tolerances had appreciable acetic acid tolerances and as a consequence did not fit the curve. ADH-F and ADH-S strains selected for high ethanol tolerances had the ability to tolerate high ethanol concentrations even after selection had been relaxed for several years. These selected lines tolerated higher acetic acid concentrations than the non-selected original strains. We propose that intake of high concentrations of ethanol and oxidation into acetic acid induces esterification of ethanol and acetic acid into ethylacetate. This cannot take place after the intake of acetic acid only, which also gives a lower energy yield.     

Tolerance to 1-pentene-3-ol and to 1-pentene-3-one in relation to alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldo keto reductase (AKR) activities inDrosophila melanogaster

The detoxification of 1-pentene-3-ol (pentenol) and 1-pentene-3-one (pentenone) by Drosophila melanogaster adult flies has been studied in two homozygous lines for the AdhF and AdhS alleles (LRC lines), in their respective lines selected for tolerance to ethanol (LRSe lines) and in a homozygous strain for the Adhn4 null allele. For each line, the genotype and sex LDs50 of both compounds were estimated. Then, in order to explain the differences in LD50, both alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldo keto reductase (AKR) activities were assayed. In addition, the effects of pentenone on AKR activity were also studied. Our results show that ADH-positive flies exhibit a much higher sensitivity to pentenol than ADH-null flies. However, both ADH-positive and ADH-null flies show a similar tolerance to pentenone. Our results show that flies selected for improving tolerance to ethanol also have increased tolerance to pentenol (FF and SS flies) and pentenone (SS flies). However, this improved ability to tolerate pentenol and/or pentenone cannot be explained by changes in ADH or AKR activities. On the other hand, we have observed a beneficial effect of pentenol, but not of pentenone, in n4 flies. We also show that AKR activity is not modified by the administration of pentenone. These results suggest that, in the absence of ADH activity, pentenol may be transformed into a compound that is less toxic than pentenone and that pentenone itself might also be transformed into a less toxic compound.