Multivesicular release at climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synapses.

Synapses driven by action potentials are thought to release transmitter in an all-or-none fashion; either one synaptic vesicle undergoes exocytosis, or there is no release. We have estimated the glutamate concentration transient at climbing fiber synapses on Purkinje cells by measuring the inhibition of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) produced by a low-affinity competitive antagonist of AMPA receptors, gamma-DGG. The results, together with simulations using a kinetic model of the AMPA receptor, suggest that the peak glutamate concentration at this synapse is dependent on release probability but is not affected by pooling of transmitter released from neighboring synapses. We propose that the mechanism responsible for the elevated glutamate concentration at this synapse is the simultaneous release of multiple vesicles per site.     

The synaptic bouton acts like a slat shaker

The physiological quantal responses at the neuromuscular junction and the bouton-neuron show two classes based on amplitude such that the larger class is about 10 times that of the smaller class; and, the larger class is composed of the smaller class. The ratio of the two classes changes with synaptogenesis, degeneration, nerve stimulation, and is readily altered with various challenges (ionic, tonicity, pharmacological agents). Statistical analyses demonstrate that each bouton or release site at the neruomuscular junction (NMJ) secretes a standard amount of transmitter (one quantum) with each action potential. The amount of transmitter secreted (quantal size) is frequency dependent. The quantal-vesicular-exocytotic (QVE) hypothesis posits that the packet of secreted transmitter is released from one vesicle by exocytosis. The QVE hypothesis neither explains two quantal classes and subunits nor exocytosis of only one vesicle at each site. The latter observation requires a mechanism to select one vesicle from each array. Our porocytosis hypothesis states that the quantal packet is pulsed from an array of secretory pores. A salt shaker delivers a standard pinch of salt with each shake because salt flows through all openings in the cap. The variation in the pinch of salt or transmitter decreases with an increase in array size. The docked vesicles, paravesicular matrix, and porosomes (pores) of a release site form the secretory unit. In analogy with the sacromere as the functional unit of skeletal muscle, we term the array of docked vesicles and paravesicular grid along with the array of postsynaptic receptors a synaptomere. Pulsed secretion from an array explains the substructure of the postsynaptic response (quantum). The array guarantees a constant amount of secretion with each action potential and permits a given synapse to function in different responses because different frequencies would secrete signature amounts of transmitter. Our porocytosis hypothesis readily explains a change in quantal size during learning and memory with an increase in the number of elements (docked vesicles) composing the array.     

The synaptic bouton acts like a salt shaker

The physiological quantal responses at the neuromuscular junction and the bouton-neuron show two classes based on amplitude such that the larger class is about 10 times that of the smaller class; and, the larger class is composed of the smaller class. The ratio of the two classes changes with synaptogenesis, degeneration, nerve stimulation, and is readily altered with various challenges (ionic, tonicity, pharmacological agents). Statistical analyses demonstrate that each bouton or release site at the neruomuscular junction (NMJ) secretes a standard amount of transmitter (one quantum) with each action potential. The amount of transmitter secreted (quantal size) is frequency dependent. The quantal-vesicular-exocytotic (QVE) hypothesis posits that the packet of secreted transmitter is released from one vesicle by exocytosis. The QVE hypothesis neither explains two quantal classes and subunits nor exocytosis of only one vesicle at each site. The latter observation requires a mechanism to select one vesicle from each array. Our porocytosis hypothesis states that the quantal packet is pulsed from an array of secretory pores. A salt shaker delivers a standard pinch of salt with each shake because salt flows through all openings in the cap. The variation in the pinch of salt or transmitter decreases with an increase in array size. The docked vesicles, paravesicular matrix, and porosomes (pores) of a release site form the secretory unit. In analogy with the sacromere as the functional unit of skeletal muscle, we term the array of docked vesicles and paravesicular grid along with the array of postsynaptic receptors a synaptomere. Pulsed secretion from an array explains the substructure of the postsynaptic response (quantum). The array guarantees a constant amount of secretion with each action potential and permits a given synapse to function in different responses because different frequencies would secrete signature amounts of transmitter. Our porocytosis hypothesis readily explains a change in quantal size during learning and memory with an increase in the number of elements (docked vesicles) composing the array.     

A model for exocytosis based on the opening of calcium-activated potassium channels in vesicles

It is proposed that the role of calcium in calcium-induced exocytosis is to open Ca-activated K channels present in vesicle membranes. The opening of these channels coupled with anion transport across the vesicle membranes would result in an influx of K and anions, increasing the osmotic pressure of the vesicles. For those vesicles situated very close to the cell plasma membrane, this would lead to fusion with the membrane and exocytosis of the vesicle contents. This model can account for facilitation and other key properties of transmitter release. In addition, the model predicts that vesicles with a higher transmitter content, and hence higher initial osmotic pressure, would be preferentially discharged. The model also predicts that a faster response can be obtained for small vesicles than for large vesicles, providing a rationale as to why neurotransmitters, which must be released quickly, are packaged in small vesicles.     

Building a bilayer model of the neuromuscular synapse

Progress over the past 10 years has made it possible to construct a simple model of neurotransmitter release. Currently, some models use artificially formed vesicles to represent synaptic vesicles and a planar lipid bilayer as a presynaptic membrane. Fusion of vesicles with the bilayer is via channel proteins in the vesicle membrane and an osmotic gradient. In this paper, a framework is presented for the successful construction of a more complete model of synaptic transmission. This model includes real synaptic vesicles that fuse with a planar bilayer. The bilayer contains acetylcholine receptor (AChR) channels which function as autoreceptors in the membrane. Vesicle fusion is initiated following a Ca²⁺ flux through voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels. Key steps in the plan are validated by mathematical modeling. Specifically, the probability that a reconstituted AChR channel opens following the release of ACh from a fusing vesicle, is calculated as a function of time, quantal content, and number of reconstituted AChRs. Experimentally obtainable parameters for construction of a working synapse are given. The inevitable construction of a full working model will mean that the minimal structures necessary for synaptic transmission are identified. This will open the door in determining regulatory and modulatory factors of transmitter release.     

Exocytotic catecholamine release is not associated with cation flux through channels in the vesicle membrane but Na+ influx through the fusion pore

Release of charged neurotransmitter molecules through a narrow fusion pore requires charge compensation by other ions. It has been proposed that this may occur by ion flow from the cytosol through channels in the vesicle membrane, which would generate a net outward current. This hypothesis was tested in chromaffin cells using cell-attached patch amperometry that simultaneously measured catecholamine release from single vesicles and ionic current across the patch membrane. No detectable current was associated with catecholamine release indicating that <2% of cations, if any, enter the vesicle through its membrane. Instead, we show that flux of catecholamines through the fusion pore, measured as an amperometric foot signal, decreases when the extracellular cation concentration is reduced. The results reveal that the rate of transmitter release through the fusion pore is coupled to net Na+ influx through the fusion pore, as predicted by electrodiffusion theory applied to fusion-pore permeation, and suggest a prefusion rather than postfusion role for vesicular cation channels.     

Theory for the feedback inhibition of fast release of neurotransmitter

Autoinhibition of neurotransmitter release occurs via binding of transmitter to appropriate receptors. Experiments have provided evidence suggesting that the control of neurotransmitter release in fast systems is mediated by these inhibitory autoreceptors. Earlier, the authors formulated and analysed a mathematical model for a theory of release control in which these autoreceptors played a key role. The key experimental findings on which the release-control theory is based are: (i) the inhibitory autoreceptor has high affinity for transmitter under rest potential and shifts to low affinity upon depolarization; (ii) the bound (with transmitter) autoreceptor associates with exocytotic machinery Ex and thereby blocks it, preventing release of neurotransmitter. Release commences when depolarization shifts the autoreceptor to a low-affinity state and thereby frees Ex from its association with the autoreceptors. Here we extend the model that describes control of release so that it also accounts for release autoinhibition. We propose that inhibition is achieved because addition of transmitter, above its rest level, causes transition of the complex of autoreceptor and Ex to a state of stronger association. Relief of Ex from this state requires higher depolarization than from the weakly associated complex. In contrast to the weakly associated complex that only requires binding of transmitter to the autoreceptor to be formed, the transition to the strongly associated complex is induced by a second messenger, which is produced as a result of the receptor binding to transmitter. The theory explains the following experimental results (among others): for inhibition via transmitter or its agonists, the magnitude of inhibition decreases with depolarization; a plot of inhibition as a function of the concentration of muscarine (an acetylcholine agonist) yields an S-shaped curve that shifts to the right for higher depolarizations; the time course of release does not change when transmitter is added; the time course of release also does not change when transmitter antagonists are added, although quantal content increases; however, addition of acetylcholine esterase (an enzyme that hydrolyses acetylcholine) prolongs release.     

Vesicular and Plasma Membrane Transporters for Neurotransmitters

The regulated exocytosis that mediates chemical signaling at synapses requires mechanisms to coordinate the immediate response to stimulation with the recycling needed to sustain release. Two general classes of transporter contribute to release, one located on synaptic vesicles that loads them with transmitter, and a second at the plasma membrane that both terminates signaling and serves to recycle transmitter for subsequent rounds of release. Originally identified as the target of psychoactive drugs, these transport systems have important roles in transmitter release, but we are only beginning to understand their contribution to synaptic transmission, plasticity, behavior, and disease. Recent work has started to provide a structural basis for their activity, to characterize their trafficking and potential for regulation. The results indicate that far from the passive target of psychoactive drugs, neurotransmitter transporters undergo regulation that contributes to synaptic plasticity.The speed and potency of synaptic transmission depend on the immediate availability of synaptic vesicles filled with high concentrations of neurotransmitter. In this article, we focus on the mechanisms responsible for packaging transmitter into synaptic vesicles and for reuptake from the extracellular space that both terminates synaptic transmission and recycles transmitter for future rounds of release. Collectively, we refer to this entire process as the neurotransmitter cycle.The recycling of neurotransmitter illustrates a general, conceptual problem for the mechanism of vesicular release. At the plasma membrane, more active reuptake should help to replenish the pool of releasable transmitter, but may also reduce the extent and duration of signaling to the postsynaptic cell. Conversely, loss of reuptake increases the activation of receptors but results in the depletion of stores (Jones et al. 1998). At the vesicle, steeper concentration gradients release more transmitter per vesicle but reduce the cytosolic transmitter available for refilling, whereas more shallow gradients facilitate refilling but reduce the transmitter available for release. The way in which the nerve terminal balances these competing factors thus has profound consequences for synaptic transmission.     

Are exocytosis mechanisms neurotransmitter specific?

Neurotransmission is a multistage regulated process in which a variety of active molecules contained in vesicles are liberated in response to specific stimuli from different types of neurone or related cells. This includes the release of fast neurotransmitters such as amino acids and acetylcholine from central and peripheral synapses, but also that of relatively slow-acting polypeptides from central and peripheral neurones or neuroendocrine cells. Considerable progress has been made over recent years in the understanding at a molecular level of the mechanism of regulated exocytosis, a crucial phase in this phenomenon. The currently proposed overall mechanism, which incorporates the “SNARE” hypothesis for vesicle-membrane docking and fusion, is based on data from experimental models ranging from brain synaptosomes to mast cells. Since the kinetics of the models studied and the physiological effects of the neurotransmitters implicated vary so much, it is pertinent to question whether a general mechanism can be proposed from such experimental data. This review examines known differences in putative exocytotic mechanisms for the various systems studied and attempts to relate these to the nature of the active substances released. Differences exist in each step of the exocytosis process and include the channel through which Ca²⁺ enters to trigger it or the internal Ca²⁺ source, the type of vesicle in which the transmitter is packaged, the way vesicles are translocated to the surface membrane or how they dock and fuse with it. Major differences have been reported in release mechanisms of different types of vesicle, but minor differences also exist within the same vesicle class. Thus small synaptic vesicles and large dense core vesicles are translocated by distinct processes and the Ca²⁺ channels, Ca²⁺ sensors and docking proteins involved in other steps are not identical in all neuronal phenotypes. It may be concluded that each of these differences has evolved to accommodate the different physiological requirements of the neuromodulator released.     

Vesicular Monogamy?

Vesicular neurotransmitter transporters package transmitter into the lumen of synaptic vesicles for quantal release. However, the number of transporters that localize to each vesicle is not known. In this issue of Neuron, a study by Daniels et al. using the Drosophila neuromuscular junction and mutations of the vesicular glutamate transporter suggests that one transporter may suffice to fill each vesicle.     

Quantal release of serotonin

We have studied the origin of quantal variability for small synaptic vesicles (SSVs) and large dense-cored vesicles (LDCVs). As a model, we used serotonergic Retzius neurons of leech that allow for combined amperometrical and morphological analyses of quantal transmitter release. We find that the transmitter amount released by a SSV varies proportionally to the volume of the vesicle, suggesting that serotonin is stored at a constant intravesicular concentration and is completely discharged during exocytosis. Transmitter discharge from LDCVs shows a higher degree of variability than is expected from their size distribution, and bulk release from LDCVs is slower than release from SSVs. On average, differences in the transmitter amount released from SSVs and LDCVs are proportional to the size differences of the organelles, suggesting that transmitter is stored at similar concentrations in SSVs and LDCVs.     

Ca(2+) channels and transmitter release at the active zone

Ca(2+)-dependent transmitter release is the most important signaling mechanism for fast information transfer between neurons. Transmitter release takes places at highly specialized active zones with sub-micrometer dimension, which contain the molecular machinery for vesicle docking and -fusion, as well as a high density of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels. In the absence of direct evidence for the ultrastructural localization of Ca(2+) channels at CNS synapses, important insights into Ca(2+) channel-vesicle coupling has come from functional experiments relating presynaptic Ca(2+) current and transmitter release, at large and accessible synapses like the calyx of Held. First, high slope values in log-log plots of transmitter release versus presynaptic Ca(2+) current indicate that multiple Ca(2+) channels are involved in release control of a single vesicle. Second, release kinetics in response to step-like depolarizations revealed fast- and slowly releasable sub-pools of vesicles, FRP and SRP, which, according to the "positional" model, are distinguished by a differential proximity to Ca(2+) channels. Considering recent evidence for a rapid conversion of SRP- to FRP vesicles, however, we highlight that multivesicular release events and clearance of vesicle membrane from the active zone must be taken into account when interpreting kinetic release data. We conclude that the careful kinetic analysis of transmitter release at presynaptically accessible and molecularly targeted synapses has the potential to yield important insights into the molecular physiology of transmitter release.     

Release of small transmitters through kiss-and-run fusion pores in rat pancreatic beta cells

Exocytosis of secretory vesicles begins with a fusion pore connecting the vesicle lumen to the extracellular space. This pore may then expand or it may close to recapture the vesicle intact. The contribution of the latter, termed kiss-and-run, to exocytosis of pancreatic beta cell large dense-core vesicles (LDCVs) is controversial. Examination of single vesicle fusion pores demonstrated that rat beta cell LDCVs can undergo exocytosis by rapid pore expansion, by the formation of stable pores, or via small transient kiss-and-run fusion pores. Elevation of cAMP shifted LDCV fusion pore openings to the transient mode. Under this condition, the small fusion pores were sufficient for release of ATP, stored within LDCVs together with insulin. Individual ATP release events occurred coincident with amperometric "stand alone feet" representing kiss-and-run. Therefore, the LDCV kiss-and-run fusion pores allow small transmitter release but likely retain the larger insulin peptide. This may represent a mechanism for selective intraislet signaling.     

The release of acetylcholine: from a cellular towards a molecular mechanism

The isolation of synaptic vesicles rich in acetylcholine (ACh) from the electric organ of Torpedo has indeed strengthened the hypothesis of transmitter exocytosis, but soon after it was found that non-vesicular free ACh was released and renewed upon stimulation. In contrast, vesicular ACh and the number of vesicles remained stable during physiological stimulations. In addition free ACh variations (representing the cytoplasmic pool) were correlated to the release kinetics as measured by the electroplaque discharge. Consequently, the mechanism releasing ACh from the cytoplasm in a packet form was searched at the presynaptic membrane itself. With synaptosomes isolated from the electric organ of Torpedo, it became possible to freeze them rapidly at the peak of ACh release and study their membrane and contents after cryofracture. A statistical analysis showed that the main structural change was the occurrence of large intramembrane particles at the peak of ACh release and under all release conditions. This impressive change contrasted with the stability in the number of vesicles. Another role for the vesicle was envisaged during intense stimulations when the cytoplasmic ACh and ATP pools become exhausted. The decrease in ATP leads to an increase in calcium and protons in the cytoplasm; this signals the depletion of vesicular ACh and ATP stores in the cytoplasm. Release can go on, while ATP promotes the uptake of calcium by vesicles. At the end of its cycle the vesicle will be full of calcium and will perhaps release it. As far as the mechanism of ACh release is concerned it probably depends on a membrane component (perhaps the large particles) activated by calcium and able to translocate ACh in a quantal or subquantal form. In most recent work we showed that if a lyophilized presynaptic membrane was used to make proteoliposomes filled with ACh, they released ACh upon calcium action.     

The SNARE protein vti1a functions in dense‐core vesicle biogenesis

The SNARE protein vti1a is proposed to drive fusion of intracellular organelles, but recent data also implicated vti1a in exocytosis. Here we show that vti1a is absent from mature secretory vesicles in adrenal chromaffin cells, but localizes to a compartment near the trans‐Golgi network, partially overlapping with syntaxin‐6. Exocytosis is impaired in vti1a null cells, partly due to fewer Ca²⁺‐channels at the plasma membrane, partly due to fewer vesicles of reduced size and synaptobrevin‐2 content. In contrast, release kinetics and Ca²⁺‐sensitivity remain unchanged, indicating that the final fusion reaction leading to transmitter release is unperturbed. Additional deletion of the closest related SNARE, vti1b, does not exacerbate the vti1a phenotype, and vti1b null cells show no secretion defects, indicating that vti1b does not participate in exocytosis. Long‐term re‐expression of vti1a (days) was necessary for restoration of secretory capacity, whereas strong short‐term expression (hours) was ineffective, consistent with vti1a involvement in an upstream step related to vesicle generation, rather than in fusion. We conclude that vti1a functions in vesicle generation and Ca²⁺‐channel trafficking, but is dispensable for transmitter release.     

The molecular mechanism of nondegranulative release of biogenic amines.

According to current teaching biogenic amines are released by exocytosis, i.e. by evacuation of amine storing vesicles or granules into the extracellular space. The release of transmitter amines is quantal, i.e. occurs in packs of transmitter molecules. These packs are assumed to be identical with vesicle contents, in other words, the smallest releasable quantum equals the amine content of one vesicle. However, there are experimental observations which do not fit in with this version of an exocytotic release theory. Observed quantitative discrepancies could be explained if the release mechanism allowed a fractional release of transmitter amine from several vesicles instead of the total evacuation of a few. The lack of adequate knowledge about the mechanisms of storage of biogenic amines within the vesicles has up til now rendered it difficult to envisage the machinery behind a fractional release of the amine content of a vesicle. In extensive in-vitro studies we have found that the matrices of amine storing granules (i.e. from mast cells, chromaffin cells and nerve terminals) show the properties of weak cation exchanger materials, carboxyl groups serving as amine binding ionic sites. When exposed to cations like sodium and potassium ions, the amines are released from their storage sites according to kinetics characteristic of weak cation exchangers. In vivo, amine release from cat adrenals on splanchnic nerve stimulation also occurs according to ion exchange kinetics. Histamine release from mast cells is considered to occur as the result of degranulation, i.e. the expulsion of histamine storing granules to the extracellular space, a typical example of exocytosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transmitter concentration profiles in the synaptic cleft: an analytical model of release and diffusion.

A three-dimensional model for release and diffusion of glutamate in the synaptic cleft was developed and solved analytically. The model consists of a source function describing transmitter release from the vesicle and a diffusion function describing the spread of transmitter in the cleft. Concentration profiles of transmitter at the postsynaptic side were calculated for different transmitter concentrations in a vesicle, release scenarios, and diffusion coefficients. From the concentration profiles the receptor occupancy could be determined using alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor kinetics. It turned out that saturation of receptors and sufficiently fast currents could only be obtained if the diffusion coefficient was one order of magnitude lower than generally assumed, and if the postsynaptic receptors formed clusters with a diameter of roughly 100 nm directly opposite the release sites. Under these circumstances the gradient of the transmitter concentration at the postsynaptic membrane outside the receptor clusters was steep, with minimal cross-talk among neighboring receptor clusters. These findings suggest that for each release site a corresponding receptor aggregate exists, subdividing an individual synapse into independent functional subunits without the need for specific lateral diffusion barriers.     

Implications of G-Protein-Mediated Ca2+ Channel Inhibition for Neurotransmitter Release and Facilitation

G-protein-mediated inhibition of Ca²⁺ current is ubiquitous in neurons, and in synaptic terminals it can lead to a reduction in transmitter release (presynaptic inhibition). This type of Ca²⁺ current inhibition can often be relieved by prepulse depolarization, so the disinhibition of Ca²⁺ current can combine with Ca²⁺-dependent mechanisms for activity-induced synaptic facilitation to amplify this form of short-term plasticity. We combine a mathematical model of a G-protein-regulated Ca²⁺ channel with a model of transmitter secretion to study the potential effects of G-protein-mediated Ca²⁺ channel inhibition and disinhibition on transmitter release and facilitation. We investigate several scenarios, with the goal of observing a range of behaviors that may occur in different synapses. We find that the effects of Ca²⁺ channel disinhibition depend greatly on the location and distribution of inhibited channels. Facilitation can be greatly enhanced if all channels are subject to inhibition or if the subpopulation of channels subject to inhibition are located closer to release sites than those insensitive to inhibition, an arrangement that has been suggested by recent experiments (Stanley and Mirotznik, 1997). We also find that the effect of disinhibition on facilitation is greater for longer action potentials. Finally, in the case of homosynaptic inhibition, where Ca²⁺ channel inhibition occurs through the binding of transmitter molecules to presynaptic autoreceptors, there will be little reduction in transmitter release during the first of two successive bursts of impulses. The reduction of release during the second burst will be significantly greater, and if the unbinding rate of autoreceptors is relatively low, then the effects of G-protein-mediated channel inhibition become more pronounced as the duration of the interburst interval is increased up to a critical point, beyond which the inhibitory effects become less pronounced. This is in contrast to presynaptic depression due to the depletion of the releasable vesicle pool, where longer interburst intervals allow for a more complete replenishment of the pool. Thus, G-protein-mediated Ca²⁺ current inhibition leads to a reduction in transmitter release, while having a highly variable amplifying effect on synaptic facilitation. The dynamic properties of this form of presynaptic inhibition are very different from those of vesicle depletion.     

Vesicle cycle in the presynaptic nerve terminal

Presynaptic nerve terminals contain a great number ofsynaptic vesicles filled with neurotransmitter. The transmission of information in synapses is mediated by release of transmitter from vesicles: exocytosis, after their fusion with presynaptic membrane. At the functioning synapses, the continuous recycling of synaptic vesicles occurs (vesicle cycle), which provides multiple reuse of vesicular membrane material during synaptic activity. Vesicle cycle consists of large number of steps, including vesicle fusion--exocytosis, formation of new vesicles--endocytosis, vesicle sorting, filling of vesicles with transmitter, intraterminal vesicle transport driving the vesicles to different vesicle pools and preparing to next exocytic event. At this paper, I presented the latest literature and our data regarding the steps and mechanisms of vesicle cycle at synapses. Special attention was paid to neuromuscular synapse as the most thoroughly investigated and as my favorite preparation.     

Calcium dependent neurotransmitter release and protein phosphorylation in synaptic vesicles.

A highly purified preparation of synaptic vesicles was prepared to study the relationship between calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release and protein phosphorylation. Calcium ions simultaneously produced significant increases in both the endogenous release of norepinephrine from the synaptic vesicles and the endogenous incorporation of [³²p] phosphate into specific synaptic vesicle proteins. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the action of calcium on the phosphorylation of specific synaptic vesicle proteins is the molecular mechanism mediating some of the effects of calcium on neurotransmitter release and synaptic vesicle function.