A Novel Functional Human Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4G

Mammalian eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is a cap-binding protein complex consisting of three subunits: eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4G. In yeast and plants, two related eIF4G species are encoded by two different genes. To date, however, only one functional eIF4G polypeptide, referred to here as eIF4GI, has been identified in mammals. Here we describe the discovery and functional characterization of a closely related homolog, referred to as eIF4GII. eIF4GI and eIF4GII share 46% identity at the amino acid level and possess an overall similarity of 56%. The homology is particularly high in certain regions of the central and carboxy portions, while the amino-terminal regions are more divergent. Far-Western analysis and coimmunoprecipitation experiments were used to demonstrate that eIF4GII directly interacts with eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF3. eIF4GII, like eIF4GI, is also cleaved upon picornavirus infection. eIF4GII restores cap-dependent translation in a reticulocyte lysate which had been pretreated with rhinovirus 2A to cleave endogenous eIF4G. Finally, eIF4GII exists as a complex with eIF4E in HeLa cells, because eIF4GII and eIF4E can be purified together by cap affinity chromatography. Taken together, our findings indicate that eIF4GII is a functional homolog of eIF4GI. These results may have important implications for the understanding of the mechanism of shutoff of host protein synthesis following picornavirus infection.     

Two Arabidopsis Loci Encode Novel Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E Isoforms That Are Functionally Distinct from the Conserved Plant Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E

Canonical translation initiation in eukaryotes begins with the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4F (eIF4F) complex, made up of eIF4E, which recognizes the 7-methylguanosine cap of messenger RNA, and eIF4G, which serves as a scaffold to recruit other translation initiation factors that ultimately assemble the 80S ribosome. Many eukaryotes have secondary EIF4E genes with divergent properties. The model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) encodes two such genes in tandem loci on chromosome 1, EIF4E1B (At1g29550) and EIF4E1C (At1g29590). This work identifies EIF4E1B/EIF4E1C-type genes as a Brassicaceae-specific diverged form of EIF4E. There is little evidence for EIF4E1C gene expression; however, the EIF4E1B gene appears to be expressed at low levels in most tissues, though microarray and RNA Sequencing data support enrichment in reproductive tissue. Purified recombinant eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c proteins retain cap-binding ability and form functional complexes in vitro with eIF4G. The eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins support translation in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but promote translation initiation in vitro at a lower rate compared with eIF4E. Findings from surface plasmon resonance studies indicate that eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c are unlikely to bind eIF4G in vivo when in competition with eIF4E. This study concludes that eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins, although bona fide cap-binding proteins, have divergent properties and, based on apparent limited tissue distribution in Arabidopsis, should be considered functionally distinct from the canonical plant eIF4E involved in translation initiation.Cap-dependent translation in eukaryotes begins with recognition of the 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5′ end of an mRNA by the translation initiation factor eIF4E, which forms the eIF4F complex with the scaffolding protein eIF4G. The binding of the RNA helicase eIF4A along with eIF4B promotes unwinding of mRNA secondary structure (Aitken and Lorsch, 2012). The eIF4F complex then serves to circularize mRNA by interaction of eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein and recruit the preinitiation complex through binding of eIF4G to eIF3 and eIF5, ultimately leading to the assembly of the 80S ribosome (Aitken and Lorsch, 2012). eIF4E is an attractive target for global regulation of translational activity through its position at the earliest step, mRNA cap recognition. In many organisms, eIF4E availability is regulated by 4E-binding proteins as well as phosphorylation and sumoylation (Jackson et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2010). However, plants appear to lack 4E-binding proteins, and the role of phosphorylation of eIF4E in translational control is less clear (Pierrat et al., 2007).The eIF4E proteins generally thought to be involved in translation initiation are Class I eIF4E proteins (Joshi et al., 2005), of which two exist in flowering plants: eIF4E, which pairs with eIF4G to form the eIF4F complex, and the plant-specific isoform eIFiso4E, which pairs with eIFiso4G to form eIFiso4F (Mayberry et al., 2011; Patrick and Browning, 2012). Class I eIF4E family members have conserved Trp residues at positions equivalent to Trp-43 and Trp-56 of Homo sapiens eIF4E (Joshi et al., 2005), and the canonical members of this class, such as plant eIF4E and eIFiso4E, have the ability to promote translation through binding of mRNA cap structure and eIF4G (or eIFiso4G).In some organisms, however, secondary Class I isoforms exist with expression patterns and functions divergent from the conserved eIF4E (Rhoads, 2009). Caenorhabditis elegans has four isoforms involved in differentiation between mono- and trimethylated mRNA caps (Keiper et al., 2000) and have specialized roles for regulation of certain sets of mRNAs, particularly in the germline (Amiri et al., 2001; Song et al., 2010). Trypanosoma brucei has four isoforms with varying ability to bind cap analog and eIF4G isoforms (Freire et al., 2011). Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a second eIF4E isoform, eIF4E2, which is nonessential under normal growth conditions, but accumulates in response to high temperatures (Ptushkina et al., 2001). It cannot, however, complement deletion of EIF4E1, and while it can bind capped mRNA and promote translation in vitro, it has reduced ability to bind an eIF4G-derived peptide.Vertebrates encode a novel Class I isoform called EIF4E1B with oocyte-specific expression and functions (Evsikov and Marín de Evsikova, 2009). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) EIF4E1B, with expression limited to muscle and reproductive tissue, has conserved residues identified as necessary for binding cap analog and eIF4G, yet fails to bind either and cannot functionally complement deletion of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) eIF4E (Robalino et al., 2004). In Xenopus spp. oocytes, the eIF4E1b protein was found to bind eIF4E transporter and cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein to form a translation-repressing complex (Minshall et al., 2007). Drosophila species have undergone extensive expansion of EIF4E-encoding loci to as many as seven different Class I eIF4E isoforms (Tettweiler et al., 2012). The seven EIF4E isoforms of Drosophila melanogaster are differentially expressed, with only five able to bind to eIF4G and complement deletion of yeast eIF4E (Hernández et al., 2005). The eIF4E-3 isoform of D. melanogaster was recently described as having a specific role in spermatogenesis (Hernández et al., 2012).Upon completion of sequencing of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome (Rhee et al., 2003), it was discovered that in addition to the conserved plant EIF4E (At4g18040) and EIFISO4E (At5g35620), there existed a tandem pair of genes of high sequence similarity on chromosome 1 that also encoded Class I eIF4E family proteins, EIF4E1B (At1g29550, also known as EIF4E3) and EIF4E1C (At1g29590, also known as EIF4E2). Published microarray and RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) data indicate little to no EIF4E1C gene expression; however, the EIF4E1B gene appears to be expressed at low levels in most tissues and enriched in tissues involved in reproduction. The protein sequences contain the residues predicted to be involved in regular eIF4E function but also showed some divergence at highly conserved residues of the canonical plant eIF4E. Genome sequencing data indicate that these genes are part of a divergent eIF4E clade specific to Brassicaceae.The biochemical properties of the eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c proteins were investigated in this work, and it was found that while they can bind mRNA cap analog and eIF4G and support translation in yeast lacking eIF4E, their eIF4G-binding and translation initiation enhancing capabilities in vitro were less robust when compared with the conserved Arabidopsis eIF4E. In addition, it appears that these EIF4E1B-type genes cannot substitute for EIF4E or EIFISO4E in planta because deletion of both of these genes appears to be lethal. Taken together, these findings indicate the EIF4E1B-type genes represent a divergent eIF4E whose roles should be considered separately from the canonical eIF4E in plant translation initiation.     

Binding Studies of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor eIF4E with Novel mRNA Dinucleotide Cap Analogues

Abstract

Studies on the interaction of the murine translation initiation factor 4E with two new-synthesized cap-analogues, modified at C2′ of 7-methylguanosine, have been performed by means of the fluorescence titration method. No difference in the binding affinity for eIF4E was observed compared with the “anti reversed” cap analogues, possessing the analogous modifications at C3′. Potential significance of the novel caps as research tools for examination of the nuclear cap binding complex CBC80/20 has been discussed.     

Genome-Wide Identification of Alternative Splice Forms Down-Regulated by Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Drosophila

Alternative mRNA splicing adds a layer of regulation to the expression of thousands of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Not all alternative splicing results in functional protein; it can also yield mRNA isoforms with premature stop codons that are degraded by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway. This coupling of alternative splicing and NMD provides a mechanism for gene regulation that is highly conserved in mammals. NMD is also active in Drosophila, but its effect on the repertoire of alternative splice forms has been unknown, as has the mechanism by which it recognizes targets. Here, we have employed a custom splicing-sensitive microarray to globally measure the effect of alternative mRNA processing and NMD on Drosophila gene expression. We have developed a new algorithm to infer the expression change of each mRNA isoform of a gene based on the microarray measurements. This method is of general utility for interpreting splicing-sensitive microarrays and high-throughput sequence data. Using this approach, we have identified a high-confidence set of 45 genes where NMD has a differential effect on distinct alternative isoforms, including numerous RNA–binding and ribosomal proteins. Coupled alternative splicing and NMD decrease expression of these genes, which may in turn have a downstream effect on expression of other genes. The NMD–affected genes are enriched for roles in translation and mitosis, perhaps underlying the previously observed role of NMD factors in cell cycle progression. Our results have general implications for understanding the NMD mechanism in fly. Most notably, we found that the NMD–target mRNAs had significantly longer 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) than the nontarget isoforms of the same genes, supporting a role for 3′ UTR length in the recognition of NMD targets in fly.     

Non-Canonical Translation Initiation Mechanisms Employed by Eukaryotic Viral mRNAs

Biochemistry (Moscow) - Viruses exploit the translation machinery of an infected cell to synthesize their proteins. Therefore, viral mRNAs have to compete for ribosomes and translation factors with...     

Control of Cell Survival and Proliferation by Mammalian Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B

Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5′UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.Targeting the translation initiation pathway is emerging as a potential therapy for inhibiting cancer cell growth (35, 38). Ribosome recruitment to the 5′ ends of eukaryotic mRNAs proceeds via translation initiation mechanisms that are dependent either on the 5′ cap structure (m⁷GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) or an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The majority of translation initiation events in eukaryotes are mediated through cap-dependent translation whereby the 40S ribosomal subunit is recruited to the vicinity of the mRNA 5′ cap structure by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex. eIF4F is comprised of eIF4E (the cap-binding subunit), eIF4A (an RNA helicase), and eIF4G (a large scaffolding protein for eIF4E, eIF4A, and other initiation factors). Once assembled at the 5′ cap, the 40S ribosomal subunit in association with several initiation factors scans the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA until it encounters a start codon in a favorable context, followed by polypeptide synthesis (37).Early in vitro studies have shown that the initiation factor eIF4B acts to potentiate ribosome recruitment to the mRNA (3, 45). eIF4B stimulates translation of both capped and uncapped mRNAs in vitro (1, 36). This function is exerted through stimulation of the helicase activity of eIF4A (43), possibly through direct interactions with eIF4A (44) or with mRNA, the ribosome-associated eIF3, and 18S rRNA (28, 29, 44). Thus, eIF4B is thought to form auxiliary bridges between the mRNA and the 40S ribosomal subunit. Toeprinting studies using mammalian eIF4B underscored its importance in the assembly of the 48S initiation complex, especially on mRNAs harboring secondary structures in the 5′UTRs (11).In vivo studies of eIF4B are limited. Ectopic expression of eIF4B in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells and in developing eye imaginal discs stimulated cell proliferation (16). Enhanced cell proliferation is most likely mediated by increased translation of a subset of mRNAs, since knockdown of Drosophila eIF4B by RNA interference (RNAi) caused a modest reduction in global translation but compromised the survival of insect cells grown under low serum conditions (16). Studies of eIF4B in mammalian cells yielded contradictory results. Transient overexpression of eIF4B stimulated translation initiation in a phosphorylation-dependent manner in some cells (18, 49) while inhibiting translation in others (30, 31, 41). These differences might be attributed to disparate levels of eIF4B overexpression.To address the physiological role of eIF4B in mRNA translation in the cell, RNAi knockdown of eIF4B was used here. We demonstrate that eIF4B is required for optimal translation. Importantly, the translation of mRNAs bearing structured 5′UTRs, such as the cell cycle regulators Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), and the antiapoptotic factors Bcl-2 and XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), was reduced as a result of eIF4B silencing by RNAi. Furthermore, eIF4B silencing promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis. Thus, we show that mammalian eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival, whereby it acts by regulating the translation of a functionally related subset of mRNAs.     

A Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein Promotes mRNA Decapping and Is Required for PUF Repression

PUF proteins are eukaryotic RNA-binding proteins that repress specific mRNAs. The mechanisms and corepressors involved in PUF repression remain to be fully identified. Here, we investigated the mode of repression by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Puf5p and Puf4p and found that Puf5p specifically requires Eap1p to repress mRNAs, whereas Puf4p does not. Surprisingly, we observed that Eap1p, which is a member of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein (4E-BP) class of translational inhibitors, does not inhibit the efficient polyribosome association of a Puf5p target mRNA. Rather, we found that Eap1p accelerates mRNA degradation by promoting decapping, and the ability of Eap1p to interact with eIF4E facilitates this activity. Deletion of EAP1 dramatically reduces decapping, resulting in accumulation of deadenylated, capped mRNA. In support of this phenotype, Eap1p associates both with Puf5p and the Dhh1p decapping factor. Furthermore, recruitment of Eap1p to downregulated mRNA is mediated by Puf5p. On the basis of these results, we propose that Puf5p promotes decapping by recruiting Eap1p and associated decapping factors to mRNAs. The implication of these findings is that a 4E-BP can repress protein expression by promoting specific mRNA degradation steps in addition to or in lieu of inhibiting translation initiation.     

Human Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G (eIF4G) Protein Binds to eIF3c, -d,and -e to Promote mRNA Recruitment to the Ribosome

Recruitment of mRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit requires the coordinated interaction of a large number of translation initiation factors. In mammals, the direct interaction between eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) and eIF3 is thought to act as the molecular bridge between the mRNA cap-binding complex and the 40S subunit. A discrete ∼90 amino acid domain in eIF4G is responsible for binding to eIF3, but the identity of the eIF3 subunit(s) involved is less clear. The eIF3e subunit has been shown to directly bind eIF4G, but the potential role of other eIF3 subunits in stabilizing this interaction has not been investigated. It is also not clear if the eIF4A helicase plays a role in stabilizing the interaction between eIF4G and eIF3. Here, we have used a fluorescence anisotropy assay to demonstrate that eIF4G binds to eIF3 independently of eIF4A binding to the middle region of eIF4G. By using a site-specific cross-linking approach, we unexpectedly show that the eIF4G-binding surface in eIF3 is comprised of the -c, -d and -e subunits. Screening multiple cross-linker positions reveals that eIF4G contains two distinct eIF3-binding subdomains within the previously identified eIF3-binding domain. Finally, by employing an eIF4G-dependent translation assay, we establish that both of these subdomains are required for efficient mRNA recruitment to the ribosome and stimulate translation. Our study reveals unexpected complexity to the eIF3-eIF4G interaction that provides new insight into the regulation of mRNA recruitment to the human ribosome.     

Regulation of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4AII by MyoD during Murine Myogenic Cell Differentiation

Gene expression during muscle cell differentiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels, including translation initiation. The PI3K/mTOR signalling pathway exerts control over protein synthesis by regulating assembly of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F, a heterotrimeric complex that stimulates recruitment of ribosomes to mRNA templates. One of the subunits of eIF4F, eIF4A, supplies essential helicase function during this phase of translation. The presence of two cellular eIF4A isoforms, eIF4AI and eIF4AII, has long thought to impart equivalent functions to eIF4F. However, recent experiments have alluded to distinct activities between them. Herein, we characterize distinct regulatory mechanisms between the eIF4A isoforms during muscle cell differentiation. We find that eIF4AI levels decrease during differentiation whereas eIF4AII levels increase during myofiber formation in a MyoD-dependent manner. This study characterizes a previously undefined mechanism for eIF4AII regulation in differentiation and highlights functional differences between eIF4AI and eIF4AII. Finally, RNAi-mediated alterations in eIF4AI and eIF4AII levels indicate that the myogenic process can tolerate short term reductions in eIF4AI or eIF4AII levels, but not both.     

The Eukaryotic Initiation Factor (eIF) 4G HEAT Domain Promotes Translation Re-initiation in Yeast Both Dependent on and Independent of eIF4A mRNA Helicase

Translation re-initiation provides the molecular basis for translational control of mammalian ATF4 and yeast GCN4 mediated by short upstream open reading (uORFs) in response to eIF2 phosphorylation. eIF4G is the major adaptor subunit of eIF4F that binds the cap-binding subunit eIF4E and the mRNA helicase eIF4A and is also required for re-initiation in mammals. Here we show that the yeast eIF4G2 mutations altering eIF4E- and eIF4A-binding sites increase re-initiation at GCN4 and impair recognition of the start codons of uORF1 or uORF4 located after uORF1. The increase in re-initiation at GCN4 was partially suppressed by increasing the distance between uORF1 and GCN4, suggesting that the mutations decrease the migration rate of the scanning ribosome in the GCN4 leader. Interestingly, eIF4E overexpression suppressed both the phenotypes caused by the mutation altering eIF4E-binding site. Thus, eIF4F is required for accurate AUG selection and re-initiation also in yeast, and the eIF4G interaction with the mRNA-cap appears to promote eIF4F re-acquisition by the re-initiating 40 S subunit. However, eIF4A overexpression suppressed the impaired AUG recognition but not the increase in re-initiation caused by the mutations altering eIF4A-binding site. These results not only provide evidence that mRNA unwinding by eIF4A stimulates start codon recognition, but also suggest that the eIF4A-binding site on eIF4G made of the HEAT domain stimulates the ribosomal scanning independent of eIF4A. Based on the RNA-binding activities identified within the unstructured segments flanking the eIF4G2 HEAT domain, we discuss the role of the HEAT domain in scanning beyond loading eIF4A onto the pre-initiation complex.     

Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4G Is Targeted for Proteolytic Cleavage by Caspase 3 during Inhibition of Translation in Apoptotic Cells

Although much is known about the multiple mechanisms which induce apoptosis, comparatively little is understood concerning the execution phase of apoptosis and the mechanism(s) of cell killing. Several reports have demonstrated that cellular translation is shut off during apoptosis; however, details of the mechanism of translation inhibition are lacking. Translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) is a crucial protein required for binding cellular mRNA to ribosomes and is known to be cleaved as the central part of the mechanism of host translation shutoff exerted by several animal viruses. Treatment of HeLa cells with the apoptosis inducers cisplatin and etoposide resulted in cleavage of eIF4G, and the extent of its cleavage correlated with the onset and extent of observed inhibition of cellular translation. The eIF4G-specific cleavage activity could be measured in cell lysates in vitro and was inhibited by the caspase inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO at nanomolar concentrations. A combination of in vivo and in vitro inhibitor studies suggest the involvement of one or more caspases in the activation and execution of eIF4G cleavage. Furthermore recombinant human caspase 3 was expressed in bacteria, and when incubated with HeLa cell lysates, was shown to produce the same eIF4G cleavage products as those observed in apoptotic cells. In addition, purified caspase 3 caused cleavage of purified eIF4G, demonstrating that eIF4G could serve as a substrate for caspase 3. Taken together, these data suggest that cellular translation is specifically inhibited during apoptosis by a mechanism involving cleavage of eIF4G, an event dependent on caspase activity.     

Single-Molecule Kinetics of the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4AI upon RNA Unwinding

1. Download : Download high-res image (376KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

The Hierarchy of Exon-Junction Complex Assembly by the Spliceosome Explains Key Features of Mammalian Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay

Exon junction complexes (EJCs) link nuclear splicing to key features of mRNA function including mRNA stability, translation, and localization. We analyzed the formation of EJCs by the spliceosome, the physiological EJC assembly machinery. We studied a comprehensive set of eIF4A3, MAGOH, and BTZ mutants in complete or C-complex–arrested splicing reactions and identified essential interactions of EJC proteins during and after EJC assembly. These data establish that EJC deposition proceeds through a defined intermediate, the pre-EJC, as an ordered, sequential process that is coordinated by splicing. The pre-EJC consists of eIF4A3 and MAGOH-Y14, is formed before exon ligation, and provides a binding platform for peripheral EJC components that join after release from the spliceosome and connect the core structure with function. Specifically, we identified BTZ to bridge the EJC to the nonsense-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) decay protein UPF1, uncovering a critical link between mRNP architecture and mRNA stability. Based on this systematic analysis of EJC assembly by the spliceosome, we propose a model of how a functional EJC is assembled in a strictly sequential and hierarchical fashion, including nuclear splicing-dependent and cytoplasmic steps.