从土壤中提取DNA方法比较

设计并比较了3种直接从土壤中提取DNA的方法。试验结果表明:3种方法都可以从土壤中提取到分子量大于23.13 kb的DNA的片段,每克干土DNA的提取量为2.5~31μg,不同方法间在DNA产量、纯度等方面存在较大差异。     

Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Number of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Present in Soil Samples

Numbers of Steinernema sp. (CB2B) and S. carpocapsae (Agriotos) exponentially declined after application into a clay loam soil. Over a 35-day sampling period, Steinernema sp. (CB2B) was more persistent than S. carpocapsae (Agriotos). The presence or absence of the second-stage cuticle on the third-stage juveniles (J3) at the time of application did not alter the rate of population decline of Steinernema sp. (CB2B). Nearly all J3 of Steinernema sp. (CB2B) and S. carpocapsae (Agriotos) lost their cuticle within 24 hours of being in soil. Centrifugal flotation recovered the greatest number of nematodes, with a lower variance than either the live bait or Baermann funnel techniques. A strong positive linear relationship was evident between numbers of nematodes present in the soil and the numbers that established in a bait insect. Approximately 40% of Steinernema sp. (CB2B) and 30% of the S. carpocapsae (Agriotos) present in the soil established in Galleria mellonella larvae. The extraction techniques had different efficiencies and gave different relative estimates of persistence for the two species. Persistence and infectivity was best measured using a combination of live bait and flotation techniques.     

土壤样品中DNA提取方法的比较

对土壤样品中提取DNA方法的有效性进行了比较研究。如果以细胞有效裂解和DNA产率为标准,用冻融进行预处理再结合SDS和溶菌酶的化学裂解方法,是效果最佳的DNA抽提方法,细胞裂解率为82%,DNA产率达20.8μg/g。为了去除PCR抑制物,将DNA样品进一步用柱纯化,回收率为80%。纯化后的DNA样品可用于16SrDNA扩增及其他分子操作。     

双向凝胶电泳比较三种常用蛋白质提取方法

组织(或细胞)的蛋白质提取效率直接影响蛋白质双向凝胶电泳(2-DE)的分辨率.为探索建立适用于人乳腺癌细胞株MCF-7蛋白质提取的最佳条件,比较目前在双向凝胶电泳中常用的3种蛋白质提取方法对MCF-7细胞总蛋白的提取效率.MCF-7细胞经培养后,分别采用M-PER试剂、标准裂解液或含硫脲裂解液提取其总蛋白质,然后进行双向凝胶电泳,并根据凝胶上蛋白质斑点的丰度和分布特点判断所得双向电泳图谱的质量,以确定MCF-7细胞蛋白质提取的相对最佳方法.结果显示,M-PER试剂法得到的图谱分辨率较低,蛋白质主要集中分布在分子量15~70kD,pH4.7~6.3的范围内;标准裂解液法得到的图谱分辨率有所提高,蛋白质分布比M-PER试剂法得到的图谱广;硫脲裂解液法得到的图谱是三者中分辨率最高的,尤其是高丰度蛋白和高分子量蛋白分离效果比前两者好.结果表明,在3种常用的蛋白质提取方法中,硫脲裂解液对细胞蛋白质的溶解性最佳,相对更适合于提取MCF-7细胞的蛋白质,并与双向凝胶电泳条件更兼容.     

三种方法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的比较

应用ELISA法、TRUST法和TPPA法分别检测梅毒患者血清标本中梅毒螺旋体IgG抗体,比较3种方法的敏感性和特异性,选择一种适合于梅毒螺旋体抗体检测的高敏感性和高特异性的血清学检测方法。     

新城疫病毒3种检测方法的研究比较

目的:利用3种方法对新城疫(Newcastle disease virus, NDV)病毒进行检测并对这3种检测方法的优缺点做出比较。方法:分别将NDV强毒F48E9和弱毒Lasota接种SPF鸡胚后,获取尿囊液。利用双抗夹心ELISA法、悬液芯片系统以及RT-PCR进行检测。通过对制备的针对新城疫病毒的抗体4D9和6C4蛋白浓度测定后,选择6C4进行生物素标记,将4D9作为固相捕获抗体,利用生物素-链霉亲和素放大系统构建双抗夹心检测体系。通过对Genebank上已发表的新城疫强弱毒F基因进行电脑分析后,设计一组针对NDV强弱毒的通用型引物,分别对强弱毒进行RT-PCR并检测其检出限。结果:ELISA法对NDV强弱毒尿囊液的检出灵敏度为1:160,但操作繁琐,耗时长;液相芯片对强弱毒尿囊液的检出限为1:160和1:320,然而和ELISA相比,操作较为方便,但仪器设备昂贵。RT-PCR对强弱毒RNA检出限分别为259pg和14pg,与前两种方法相比,PR-PCR在核酸水平上对病毒进行检测,理论上灵敏度较高,但是所需试剂、设备昂贵,且实验人员还需一定的技能培训。     

三种土壤微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

本文对3种常用的土壤微生物总DNA提取方法Martin法、高盐改进法及试剂盒法进行了比较,并通过DNA得率、纯度及16S rDNA V3可变区的PCR扩增结合DGGE法(denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis),分别对3种方法进行评价.结果表明,3种方法提取的DNA均能满足土壤微生物多样性分析的要求.其中试剂盒方法操作简单,提取的DNA质量较高,但DNA得率较低且成本昂贵.Martin法和高盐改进法用时较长,DNA得率较高,纯度较低,但对后续PCR扩增和DGGE分析没有明显影响,且成本低廉.     

幽门螺旋菌感染的3种检验方法比较

1990年4至10月我们对作胃镜检查的254例胃病患者的胃活检标本进行幽门螺旋菌(简称HP)感染的直接尿素酶试验、涂片镜检和烛缸法培养HP,并将3种方法加以对比。3种方法共检出HP阳性者173例,检出率68.11％,尿素酶试验阳性170例(66.93％),4小时内阳性率为97.65％,12小时即100％出现阳性,涂片镜检阳性165例(64.96％),镜检与尿素酶阳性符合率为95.3％。培养阳性172例(51.97％)。药敏结果显示该菌对痢特灵、四环素、青霉素、庆大霉素、氨苄青霉素敏感。     

亚热带常绿阔叶林调查中三种方法的比较

本文以昆明西山滇青冈为优势的亚热带常绿阔叶林为对象,介绍并比较了三种植被调查方法,即无样地取样法的中点象限法、记数样方法和样地记录法。按样地数目的代表性,采用6线90中点分别与两组3个400m2样地作比较。在各工作小组的人数和熟练程度基本一致条件下,记录完成时间,以对比速度。内业工作量也作了比较。从深入比较中清楚看到,对于亚热带常绿阔叶林的调查,中点象限法并不是一种可取的方法。     

双向凝胶电泳中三种蛋白质检测方法的比较

高通量双向电泳是蛋白质组学的核心 ,双向电泳凝胶上蛋白质点的检测方法应具有灵敏度高、线性范围宽和兼容质谱鉴定等优点 .采用差异凝胶电泳 (differencegelelectrophoresis ,DIGE)技术以Cy3(1 (5 carboxypentyl) 1′ propylindocarbocyaninehalideN hydroxysuccinimidylester)和Cy5 (1 (5 carboxypentyl) 1′ methylindodicarbocyaninehalideN hydroxysuccinimidylester)荧光分别标记正常和TNF α处理细胞的蛋白质 ,用Cy2 (3 (4 carboxymethyl)phenylmethyl) 3′ ethyloxacarbocyaninehalideN hydroxysuccinimidylester)荧光标记正常和TNF α处理细胞蛋白质的等量混合样品作为内标 ,混合 3种荧光标记的蛋白质后 ,在同一等电聚焦胶条进行聚焦 ,然后在聚丙烯酰胺凝胶上进行第二向电泳 ,用 3种波长的激光激发扫描得到凝胶图象 ,DIGE中多个样品在同一条件下电泳 ,因而匹配率高 ,且引入内标使蛋白质点的检测与定量更为准确 .DIGE技术与质谱相结合 ,实现了高通量和相对准确定量 .与硝酸银和考马斯亮蓝染色结果相比较 ,DIGE技术具有灵敏度高、线性范围宽和不影响后续质谱鉴定等优点     

四种土壤微生物总DNA的纯化方法的比较

比较了4种从土壤中直接抽提的微生物总DNA的纯化方法,实验结果表明1 %的琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化方法及葡聚糖凝胶G 2 0 0离心层析纯化方法均不能完全纯化从土壤中抽提的微生物总DNA。若将直接抽提的总DNA先经葡聚糖凝胶G 2 0 0离心层析纯化,再用1 %的琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化,则能取得较好的纯化效果。含2 %PVP的1 %琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化,用DNA凝胶回收试剂盒回收后没有得到纯化后的土壤微生物总DNA。     

Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods

Objective

Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) can help differentiate between central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and Glioblastoma (GBM). However, overlap between ADCs for GBM and lymphoma have been reported because of various region of interest (ROI) methods. Our aim is to explore ROI method to provide the most reproducible results for differentiation.

Materials and Methods

We studied 25 CNS lymphomas and 62 GBMs with three ROI methods: (1) ROI₁, whole tumor volume; (2) ROI₂, multiple ROIs; and (3) ROI₃, a single ROI. Interobserver variability of two readers for each method was analyzed by intraclass correlation(ICC). ADCs were compared between GBM and lymphoma, using two-sample t-test. The discriminative ability was determined by ROC analysis.

Results

ADCs from ROI₁ showed most reproducible results (ICC >0.9). For ROI₁, ADC_mean for lymphoma showed significantly lower values than GBM (p = 0.03). The optimal cut-off value was 0.98×10⁻³ mm²/s with 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity. For ROI₂, ADC_min for lymphoma was significantly lower than GBM (p = 0.02). The cut-off value was 0.69×10⁻³ mm²/s with 87% sensitivity and 88% specificity.

Conclusion

ADC values were significantly dependent on ROI method. ADCs from the whole tumor volume had the most reproducible results. ADC_mean from the whole tumor volume may aid in differentiating between lymphoma and GBM. However, multi-modal imaging approaches are recommended than ADC alone for differentiation.     

利用不同方法从深加工牦牛肉产品中提取基因组DNA效果的比较

为了从深加工牦牛肉产品中获得片段较大、数量较多的基因组DNA,以用于分子追溯的检测,尝试并系统地比较了异硫氰酸胍法、酚-氯仿抽提法和试剂盒提取法的提取效果。通过定量分析、凝胶电泳和PCR片段大小梯度扩增等手段,对利用3种方法提取的基因组DNA的数量和质量进行了比较。结果显示,利用酚-氯仿抽提法提取的基因组DNA质量不佳,异硫氰酸胍法和试剂盒提取法的提取效果相当,PCR可以扩增出730 bp左右的核外基因细胞色素b,而核内基因只能扩增出300bp左右的核基因DNA片段(内乳铁蛋白基因,271 bp;BoLA-DRB3基因,302 bp)。综合考虑提取时间、费用、数量和质量等各方面的因素,认为异硫氰酸胍法操作简便、快速、廉价、有效,是较好的从动物深加工肉产品中提取基因组DNA的方法。     

三种关于建立家兔人工气道方法的评价

目的比较关于家兔三种人工气道（artificial airway,AA）建立方法,为实验中快速建立家兔人工气道选择较好的方法提供参考。方法选用新西兰大耳白兔共30只,随机均分为3组。分别采用气管切开法、经口明视气管插管法、经口盲探气管插管法建立人工气道,比较各组建立人工气道的时间,首次成功率及并发症发生情况。结果经口盲探气管插管法建立人工气道的时间明显短于经口明视气管插管法和气管切开法,首次成功率由高到低依次是气管切开法、经口盲探气管插管法、经口明视气管插管法。经口盲探气管插管组并发症发生率最低,为（10±5）%,气管切开组和经口明视气管插管组并发症发生率分别为（20±10）%,（30±10）%。结论经口盲探气管插管是现阶段建立家兔人工气道时值得优先考虑的方法,简便易行、可操作性强,成功率高。     

三种李斯特菌菌体蛋白提取方法的比较

通过对3种李斯特菌菌体蛋白提取方法主要是破壁方式的比较,找到一种可高效提取李斯特菌菌体蛋白的方法,为该菌的深入研究提供可靠技术。以绵羊李斯特菌新鲜液体培养物为材料,收集菌沉淀,分别选用3种破壁方式破除细胞壁,三氯乙酸(trichloroacetic acid,TCA)-丙酮沉淀法沉淀破壁液中的菌体蛋白,采用聚丙烯酰氨凝胶电泳(sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,SDS-PAGE)和Western-blot分析所得菌体蛋白。溶菌酶-超声破壁-TCA-丙酮沉淀法提取得到的李斯特菌菌体蛋白SDS-PAGE条带清晰丰富,Western-blot条带特异。溶菌酶-超声破壁-TCA-丙酮沉淀法可有效提取李斯特菌菌体蛋白,满足常用蛋白分析技术的要求,是一种提取李斯特菌菌体蛋白的可靠方法。     

三种黑曲霉细胞基因组DNA提取方法的比较

采用三种方法提取黑曲霉基因组DNA,比较了各方法的提取时间、DNA纯度和产量,结果表明：二次沉淀法耗时5-6h,但提取的黑曲霉细胞基因组DNA质量好,产量高达130μg／g菌丝体;其次为中性裂解法耗时1—2h,产量约13μg／g菌丝体;再次为氯化苄法耗时3—4h,产量约3μg／g菌丝体。     

3种小球藻DNA提取方法的比较

单细胞真核藻类小球藻已成为藻类分子生物学研究的热点,但其特殊的细胞壁组分给DNA的提取带来了一定的困难。文章比较了3种从小球藻中提取DNA的方法,即纤维素酶法、作者改进的CATB法和目前单细胞藻类常用的裂解法。通过所提取的DNA进行浓度、纯度分析,认为CTAB法是一种简单、快速和高效的适合于小球藻的DNA提取方法。     

Comparison of Three Methods Used to Isolate Dengue Virus Type 2

During the 1969 dengue epidemic in Puerto Rico, human sera and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were collected for virus isolation and identification. Three methods of isolation were used and compared. In the first method, we inoculated newborn mice by the intracranial route, noted any signs of illness, and serially passed specimens in mice until virus was isolated. In the second method, we inoculated tube cultures of LLC-MK(2) cells, noted any cytopathic effect (CPE), and assayed fluids for virus by plaque formation in LLC-MK(2) cell monolayers. The third method was different from the second only in that the original specimens were first inoculated into fluid cultures of Singh's A. albopictus cells. No significant CPE was seen in LLC-MK(2) cultures; however, distinct syncytial CPE was observed in A. albopictus cells. About the same number of virus isolates were made in each isolation system. Virus isolates from both sera and mosquitoes were identified as dengue type 2 by a plaque-reduction neutralization test in LLC-MK(2) cells. The utility of the three methods, individually or in combination, is discussed and related to diagnostic and epidemic situations.