Arrestin isoforms dictate differential kinetics of A2B adenosine receptor trafficking

Adenosine mediates the activation of adenylyl cyclase via its interaction with specific A(2A) and A(2B) adenosine receptors. Previously, we demonstrated that arrestins are involved in rapid agonist-promoted desensitization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)AR) in HEK293 cells. In the present study, we investigate the role of arrestins in A(2B)AR trafficking. Initial studies demonstrated that HEK293 cells stably expressing arrestin antisense constructs, which reduce endogenous arrestin levels, effectively reduced A(2B)AR internalization. A(2B)AR recycling after agonist-induced endocytosis was also significantly impaired in cells with reduced arrestin levels. Interestingly, while overexpression of arrestin-2 or arrestin-3 rescued A(2B)AR internalization and recycling, arrestin-3 promoted a significantly faster rate of recycling as compared to arrestin-2. The specificity of arrestin interaction with A(2B)ARs was further investigated using arrestins fused to the green fluorescent protein (arr-2-GFP and arr-3-GFP). Both arrestins underwent rapid translocation (<1 min) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane following A(2B)AR activation. However, longer incubations with agonist (>10 min) revealed that arr-2-GFP but not arr-3-GFP colocalized with the A(2B)AR in rab-5 and transferrin receptor containing early endosomes. At later times, the A(2B)AR but not arr-2-GFP was observed in an apparent endocytic recycling compartment. Thus, while arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 mediate agonist-induced A(2B)AR internalization with relative equal potency, arrestin isoform binding dictates the differential kinetics of A(2B)AR recycling and resensitization.     

Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors

Visual arrestin, betaarrestin1, and betaarrestin2 comprise a family of intracellular proteins that desensitize G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 target desensitized receptors to clathrin-coated pits for endocytosis. Whether arrestins differ in their ability to interact with GPCRs in cells is not known. In this study, we visualize the interaction of arrestin family members with GPCRs in real time and in live cells using green fluorescent protein-tagged arrestins. In the absence of agonist, visual arrestin and betaarrestin1 were found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of HEK-293 cells, whereas betaarrestin2 was found only in the cytoplasm. Analysis of agonist-mediated arrestin translocation to multiple GPCRs identified two major classes of receptors. Class A receptors (beta2 adrenergic receptor, mu opioid receptor, endothelin type A receptor, dopamine D1A receptor, and alpha1b adrenergic receptor) bound betaarrestin2 with higher affinity than betaarrestin1 and did not interact with visual arrestin. In contrast, class B receptors (angiotensin II type 1A receptor, neurotensin receptor 1, vasopressin V2 receptor, thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor, and substance P receptor) bound both betaarrestin isoforms with similar high affinities and also interacted with visual arrestin. Switching the carboxyl-terminal tails of class A and class B receptors completely reversed the affinity of each receptor for the visual and non-visual arrestins. In addition, exchanging the betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 carboxyl termini reversed their extent of binding to class A receptors as well as their subcellular distribution. These results reveal for the first time marked differences in the ability of arrestin family members to bind GPCRs at the plasma membrane. Moreover, they show that visual arrestin can interact in cells with GPCRs other than rhodopsin. These findings suggest that GPCR signaling may be differentially regulated depending on the cellular complement of arrestin isoforms and the ability of arrestins to interact with other cellular proteins.     

Ubiquitin ligase parkin promotes Mdm2-arrestin interaction but inhibits arrestin ubiquitination

Numerous mutations in E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin were shown to associate with familial Parkinson's disease. Here we show that parkin binds arrestins, versatile regulators of cell signaling. Arrestin-parkin interaction was demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins from brain tissue and shown to be direct using purified proteins. Parkin binding enhances arrestin interactions with another E3 ubiquitin ligase, Mdm2, apparently by shifting arrestin conformational equilibrium to the basal state preferred by Mdm2. Although Mdm2 was reported to ubiquitinate arrestins, parkin-dependent increase in Mdm2 binding dramatically reduces the ubiquitination of both nonvisual arrestins, basal and stimulated by receptor activation, without affecting receptor internalization. Several disease-associated parkin mutations differentially affect the stimulation of Mdm2 binding. All parkin mutants tested effectively suppress arrestin ubiquitination, suggesting that bound parkin shields arrestin lysines targeted by Mdm2. Parkin binding to arrestins along with its effects on arrestin interaction with Mdm2 and ubiquitination is a novel function of this protein with implications for Parkinson's disease pathology.     

Dopamine D2 receptor stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases mediated by cell type-dependent transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases

Dopamine D2 receptor activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in non-neuronal human embryonic kidney 293 cells was dependent on transactivation of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor, as demonstrated by the effect of the PDGF receptor inhibitors tyrphostin A9 and AG 370 on quinpirole-induced phosphorylation of ERKs and by quinpirole-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the PDGF receptor. In contrast, ectopically expressed D2 receptor or endogenous D2-like receptor activation of ERKs in NS20Y neuroblastoma cells, which express little or no PDGF receptor, or in rat neostriatal neurons was largely dependent on transactivation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, as demonstrated using the EGF receptor inhibitor AG 1478 and by quinpirole-induced phosphorylation of the EGF receptor. The D2 receptor agonist quinpirole enhanced the coprecipitation of D2 and EGF receptors in NS20Y cells, suggesting that D2 receptor activation induced the formation of a macromolecular signaling complex that includes both receptors. Transactivation of the EGF receptor also involved the activity of a matrix metalloproteinase. Thus, although D2 receptor stimulation of ERKs in both cell lines was decreased by inhibitors of ERK kinase, Src-family protein tyrosine kinases, and serine/threonine protein kinases, D2-like receptors activated ERKs via transactivation of the EGF receptor in NS20Y neuroblastoma cells and rat embryonic neostriatal neurons, but via transactivation of the PDGF receptor in 293 cells.     

N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation domains differentially regulate arrestin and agonist affinity

Arrestins regulate the signaling and endocytosis of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It has been suggested that the functions of arrestins are dependent upon both the number and pattern of phosphorylation sites present in an activated GPCR. However, little is currently known about the relationships between the sites of receptor phosphorylation, the resulting affinities of arrestin binding, and the ensuing mechanisms of receptor regulation for any given GPCR. To investigate these interactions, we used an active truncated mutant of arrestin (amino acids 1-382) and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR). In contrast to results with wild type arrestins, the truncated arrestin-2 protein bound to the unphosphorylated wild type FPR, although with lower affinity and a low affinity for the agonist as revealed by competition studies with heterotrimeric G proteins. Using FPR mutants, we further demonstrated that the phosphorylation status of serines and threonines between residues 328-332 is a key determinant that regulates the affinity of the FPR for arrestins. Furthermore, we found that the phosphorylation status of serine and threonine residues between amino acids 334 and 339 regulates the affinity of the receptor for agonist when arrestin is bound. These results suggest that the agonist affinity state of the receptor is principally regulated by phosphorylation at specific sites and is not simply a consequence of arrestin binding as has previously been proposed. Furthermore, this is the first demonstration that agonist affinity of a GPCR and the affinity of arrestin binding to the phosphorylated receptor are regulated by distinct receptor phosphodomains.     

Inhibition of chemoattractant N-formyl peptide receptor trafficking by active arrestins

Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of a class of G protein-coupled receptors that are internalized in an arrestin-independent manner. In addition to demonstrating that the N-formyl peptide receptor belongs in this family, we have recently shown that recycling of the receptor requires the presence of arrestins. To further elucidate mechanisms of arrestin-dependent regulation of G protein-coupled receptor processing, we examined the effects of altering the receptor-arrestin complex on ternary complex formation and cellular trafficking of the N-formyl peptide receptor by studying two active arrestin-2 mutants (truncated arrestin-2 [1-382], and arrestin-2 I386A, V387A, F388A). Complexes between the N-formyl peptide receptor and active arrestins exhibited higher affinity in vitro than the complex between the N-formyl peptide receptor and wild-type arrestin and furthermore were observed in vivo by colocalization studies using confocal microscopy. To assess the effects of these altered interactions on receptor trafficking, we demonstrated that active, but not wild-type, arrestin expression retards N-formyl peptide receptor internalization. Furthermore, expression of arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A but not arrestin-2 [1-382] inhibited recycling of the N-formyl peptide receptor, reflecting an expanded role for arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor processing and trafficking. Whereas the extent of N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation had no effect on the inhibition of internalization, N-formyl peptide receptor recycling was restored when the receptor was only partially phosphorylated. These results indicate not only that a functional interaction between receptor and arrestin is required for recycling of certain G protein-coupled receptors, such as the N-formyl peptide receptor, but that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation further regulates this process.     

Arrestin 3 mediates endocytosis of CCR7 following ligation of CCL19 but not CCL21

Internalization of ligand bound G protein-coupled receptors, an important cellular function that mediates receptor desensitization, takes place via distinct pathways, which are often unique for each receptor. The C-C chemokine receptor (CCR7) G protein-coupled receptor is expressed on naive T cells, dendritic cells, and NK cells and has two endogenous ligands, CCL19 and CCL21. Following binding of CCL21, 21 +/- 4% of CCR7 is internalized in the HuT 78 human T cell lymphoma line, while 76 +/- 8% of CCR7 is internalized upon binding to CCL19. To determine whether arrestins mediated differential internalization of CCR7/CCL19 vs CCR7/CCL21, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knock down expression of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 in HuT 78 cells. Independent of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 expression, CCR7/CCL21 internalized. In contrast, following depletion of arrestin 3, CCR7/CCL19 failed to internalize. To examine the consequence of complete loss of both arrestin 2 and arrestin 3 on CCL19/CCR7 internalization, we examined CCR7 internalization in arrestin 2(-/-)/arrestin 3(-/-) murine embryonic fibroblasts. Only reconstitution with arrestin 3-GFP but not arrestin 2-GFP rescued internalization of CCR7/CCL19. Loss of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 blocked migration to CCL19 but had no effect on migration to CCL21. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that arrestins do not cluster at the membrane with CCR7 following ligand binding but cap with CCR7 during receptor internalization. These are the first studies that define a role for arrestin 3 in the internalization of a chemokine receptor following binding of one but not both endogenous ligands.     

Mammalian Alpha Arrestins Link Activated Seven Transmembrane Receptors to Nedd4 Family E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Interact with Beta Arrestins

The complement of fungal cell surface proteins is widely regulated by ubiquitination of membrane proteins, which results in their endocytosis and vacuolar degradation. For diverse fungal transporters, the specificity of ubiquitination is conferred by alpha arrestin adaptors, which recruit the Nedd4 family E3 ubiquitin ligase Rsp5. A recent study showed that one mammalian alpha arrestin also mediates ubiquitination and lysosomal trafficking of an activated plasma membrane receptor. Here we first screen all five widely-expressed human alpha arrestins for subcellular localization in ligand-stimulated and -unstimulated cells overexpressing the seven transmembrane receptor vasopressin 2. We then characterize the effects of alpha arrestins ARRDC3 and ARRDC4 upon activation of the seven transmembrane receptors vasopressin 2 and beta adrenergic 2. Using biochemical and imaging approaches, we show that ligand-activated receptors interact with alpha arrestins, and this results in recruitment of Nedd4 family E3 ubiquitin ligases and receptor ubiquitination – which are known to result in lysosomal trafficking. Our time course studies show these effects occur in the first 1–5 minutes after ligand activation, the same time that beta arrestins are known to have roles in receptor endocytic trafficking and kinase signaling. We tested the possibility that alpha and beta arrestins function coordinately and found co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization evidence to support this. Others recently reported that Arrdc3 knockout mice are lean and resistant to obesity. In the course of breeding our own Arrdc3-deficient mice, we observed two novel phenotypes in homozygotes: skin abnormalities, and embryonic lethality on normal chow diet, but not on high fat diet. Our findings suggest that alpha and beta arrestins function coordinately to maintain the optimal complement and function of cell surface proteins according to cellular physiological context and external signals. We discuss the implications of the alpha arrestin functions in fungi having evolved into coordinated alpha/beta arrestin functions in animals.     

Structure and function of the third intracellular loop of the 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptor: the third intracellular loop is alpha-helical and binds purified arrestins

Understanding the precise structure and function of the intracellular domains of G protein-coupled receptors is essential for understanding how receptors are regulated, and how they transduce their signals from the extracellular milieu to intracellular sites. To understand better the structure and function of the intracellular domain of the 5-hydroxytryptamine2A (5-HT2A) receptor, a model G(alpha)q-coupled receptor, we overexpressed and purified to homogeneity the entire third intracellular loop (i3) of the 5-HT2A receptor, a region previously implicated in G-protein coupling. Circular dichroism spectroscopy of the purified i3 protein was consistent with alpha-helical and beta-loop, -turn, and -sheet structure. Using random peptide phage libraries, we identified several arrestin-like sequences as i3-interacting peptides. We subsequently found that all three known arrestins (beta-arrestin, arrestin-3, and visual arrestin) bound specifically to fusion proteins encoding the i3 loop of the 5-HT(2A) receptor. Competition binding studies with synthetic and recombinant peptides showed that the middle portion of the i3 loop, and not the extreme N and C termini, was likely to be involved in i3-arrestin interactions. Dual-label immunofluorescence confocal microscopic studies of rat cortex indicated that many cortical pyramidal neurons coexpressed arrestins (beta-arrestin or arrestin-3) and 5-HT2A receptors, particularly in intracellular vesicles. Our results demonstrate (a) that the i3 loop of the 5-HT2A receptor represents a structurally ordered domain composed of alpha-helical and beta-loop, -turn, and -sheet regions, (b) that this loop interacts with arrestins in vitro, and is hence active, and (c) that arrestins are colocalized with 5-HT2A receptors in vivo.     

Arrestin variants display differential binding characteristics for the phosphorylated N-formyl peptide receptor carboxyl terminus.

The phosphorylation-dependent binding of arrestins to cytoplasmic domains of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to be a crucial step in receptor desensitization. In some GPCR systems, arrestins have also been demonstrated to be involved in receptor internalization, resensitization, and the activation of signaling cascades. The objective of the current study was to examine binding interactions of members of the arrestin family with the formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a member of the GPCR family of receptors. Peptides representing the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated carboxyl terminus of the FPR were synthesized and bound to polystyrene beads via a biotin/streptavidin interaction. Using fluorescein-conjugated arrestins, binding interactions between arrestins and the bead-bound FPR carboxyl terminus were analyzed by flow cytometry. Arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 bound to the FPR carboxyl-terminal peptide in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, with K(d) values in the micromolar range. Binding of visual arrestin, which binds rhodopsin with high selectivity, was not observed. Arrestin-2-(1--382) and arrestin-3-(1--393), truncated mutant forms of arrestin that display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact receptors, were also observed to bind the bead-bound FPR terminus in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, but with much greater affinity than the full-length arrestins, yielding K(d) values in the 5--50 nm range. Two additional arrestin mutants, which are full-length but display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact GPCRs, were evaluated for their binding affinity to the FPR carboxyl terminus. Whereas the single point mutant, arrestin-2 R169E, displayed an affinity similar to that of the full-length arrestins, the triple point mutant, arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A, displayed an affinity more similar to that of the truncated forms of arrestin. The results suggest that the carboxyl terminus of arrestin is a critical determinant in regulating the binding affinity of arrestin for the phosphorylated domains of GPCRs.     

Mu opioid receptor activation of ERK1/2 is GRK3 and arrestin dependent in striatal neurons

In this study we investigated the mechanisms responsible for MAP kinase ERK1/2 activation following agonist activation of endogenous mu opioid receptors (MOR) normally expressed in cultured striatal neurons. Treatment with the MOR agonist fentanyl caused significant activation of ERK1/2 in neurons derived from wild type mice. Fentanyl effects were blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone and were not evident in neurons derived from MOR knock-out (-/-) mice. In contrast, ERK1/2 activation by fentanyl was not evident in neurons from GRK3-/- mice or neurons pretreated with small inhibitory RNA for arrestin3. Consistent with this observation, treatment with the opiate morphine (which is less able to activate arrestin) did not elicit ERK1/2 activation in wild type neurons; however, transfection of arrestin3-(R170E) (a dominant positive form of arrestin that does not require receptor phosphorylation for activation) enabled morphine activation of ERK1/2. In addition, activation of ERK1/2 by fentanyl and morphine was rescued in GRK3-/- neurons following transfection with dominant positive arrestin3-(R170E). The activation of ERK1/2 appeared to be selective as p38 MAP kinase activation was not increased by either fentanyl or morphine treatment in neurons from wild type, MOR-/-, or GRK3-/- mice. In addition, U0126 (a selective inhibitor of MEK kinase responsible for ERK phosphorylation) blocked ERK1/2 activation by fentanyl. These results support the hypothesis that MOR activation of ERK1/2 requires opioid receptor phosphorylation by GRK3 and association of arrestin3 to initiate the cascade resulting in ERK1/2 phosphorylation in striatal neurons.     

N-formyl peptide receptors internalize but do not recycle in the absence of arrestins

Arrestins mediate phosphorylation-dependent desensitization, internalization, and initiation of signaling cascades for the majority of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Many GPCRs undergo agonist-mediated internalization through arrestin-dependent mechanisms, wherein arrestin serves as an adapter between the receptor and endocytic proteins. To understand the role of arrestins in N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) trafficking, we stably expressed the FPR in a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (MEF) that lacked endogenous arrestin 2 and arrestin 3 (arrestin-deficient). We compared FPR internalization and recycling kinetics in these cells to congenic wild type MEF cell lines. Internalization of the FPR was not altered in the absence of arrestins. Since the FPR remains associated with arrestins following internalization, we investigated whether the rate of FPR recycling was altered in arrestin-deficient cells. While the FPR was able to recycle in the wild type cells, receptor recycling was largely absent in the arrestin double knockout cells. Reconstitution of the arrestin-deficient line with either arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 restored receptor recycling. Confocal fluorescence microscopy studies demonstrated that in arrestin-deficient cells the FPR may become trapped in the perinuclear recycling compartment. These observations indicate that, although the FPR can internalize in the absence of arrestins, recycling of internalized receptors to the cell surface is prevented. Our results suggest a novel role for arrestins in the post-endocytic trafficking of GPCRs.     

Molecular evidence and clinical importance of β‐arrestins expression in patients with acromegaly

β‐arrestins seem to have a role in endocytosis and desensitization of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) and could be associated with the responsiveness to somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in patients with acromegaly. To investigate the in vivo correlation between β‐arrestins 1 and 2 with sst2, sst5 and dopamine receptor subtype 2 (D2) expressions, and the association of β‐arrestins with response to first‐generation SRL and invasiveness in somatotropinomas. β‐arrestins 1 and 2, sst2, sst5 and D2 mRNA expressions were evaluated by quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR on tumoral tissue of 96 patients. Moreover, sst2 and sst5 protein expressions were also evaluated in 40 somatotropinomas by immunohistochemistry. Response to SRL, defined as GH <1 μg/l and normal IGF‐I levels, was assessed in 40 patients. The Knosp‐Steiner criteria were used to define invasiveness. Median β‐arrestin 1, β‐arrestin 2, sst2, sst5 and D2 mRNA copy numbers were 478; 9375; 731; 156 ; and 3989, respectively. There was a positive correlation between β‐arrestins 1 and 2 (R = 0.444, P < 0.001). However, no correlation between β‐arrestins and sst2, sst5 (mRNA and protein levels) or D2 was found. No association was found between β‐arrestins expression and SRL responsiveness or tumour invasiveness. Although previous data suggest a putative correlation between β‐arrestins and sst2, our data clearly indicated that no association existed between β‐arrestins and sst2, sst5 or D2 expression, nor with response to SRL or tumour invasiveness. Therefore, further studies are required to clarify whether β‐arrestins have a role in the response to treatment with SRL in acromegaly.     

Arrestin2 expression selectively increases during neural differentiation

Arrestins and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are key players in homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. Two non-visual arrestins, arrestin2 and 3, and five GRKs (GRK2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) are involved in desensitization of many receptors. Here, we demonstrate a steady increase in arrestin2 expression during prenatal development. The density of arrestin2 mRNA is higher in differentiated areas as compared with proliferative zones, whereas arrestin3 mRNA shows the opposite distribution. At embryonic day 14, concentrations of arrestin proteins are similar (32-34 nM). Later in development, arrestin2 expression rises, leading to a fourfold excess of arrestin2 over arrestin3 at birth (48 vs. 11 ng/mg protein or 102 vs. 25 nM). Among GRKs, only GRK5 increased with embryonic age from 124 nm at E14 to 359 nM at birth. Similarly, in vitro differentiation of cultured precursor cells, neurospheres, leads to a significant up-regulation of arrestin2 resulting in > 20-fold excess of arrestin2 (160 vs. 7 nM). GRK5 is the only subtype increased with neurosphere differentiation, although the change is only about twofold. The data demonstrate selective increases in the expression of arrestin2 associated with neural development and suggest specific yet unappreciated roles for arrestin2 in neural differentiation.     

Arrestin binding to calmodulin: a direct interaction between two ubiquitous signaling proteins

Arrestins serve as multi-functional regulators of G-protein coupled receptors, interacting with hundreds of different receptor subtypes and a variety of other signaling proteins. Here we identify calmodulin as a novel arrestin interaction partner using three independent methods in vitro and in cells. Arrestin preferentially binds calcium-loaded calmodulin with a Kd value of approximately 7 microM, which is within range of endogenous calmodulin concentrations. The calmodulin binding site is localized on the concave side of the C-domain and a loop in the center of the arrestin molecule, significantly overlapping with receptor and microtubule-binding sites. Using purified proteins, we found that arrestins sequester calmodulin, preventing its binding to microtubules. Nanomolar affinity of arrestins for their cognate receptors makes calmodulin an ineffective competitor for arrestin binding at relatively high receptor concentrations. The arrestin-calmodulin interaction likely regulates the localization of both proteins and their availability for other interaction partners.     

Role of ßarrestins in bradykinin B2 receptor-mediated signalling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can engage multiple pathways to activate ERK1/2 via both G proteins and/or ßarrestin. Receptor recruitment of ßarrestin is also important for GPCR desensitization, internalization and resensitization. Modulation of the receptor/ßarrestin interaction through modification of either component would presumably alter the output generated by receptor activation. Here we examined how ßarrestins regulate bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor (B2R) signalling and desensitization by either truncating ßarrestin1 or ßarrestin2 or by alanine substitution of a serine/threonine cluster in the C-terminal tail of B2R (B2R-4A), conditions which all affect the avidity of the B2R/ßarrestin complex. We first demonstrate that BK-mediated ERK1/2 activation is biphasic containing an early peak (between 2-5 min) followed by sustained activation for at least 60 min. The early but not the sustained phase was predictably affected by inhibition of either Gαq/11 or Gαi/o, whereas loss of ßarrestin2 but not ßarrestin1 resulted in diminished prolonged ERK1/2 activation. ßarrestin2's role was further examined using a truncation mutant with augmented avidity for the agonist-occupied receptor, revealing an increase in both immediate and extended ERK1/2 signalling. We also show that ERK1/2 is recruited to the B2R/ßarrestin complex on endosomes as well as the plasma membrane. Moreover, we investigated ßarrestin's role using the B2R-4A, which is deficient in ßarrestin binding and does not internalize. We show that ERK1/2 signalling downstream of the receptor is entirely G protein-dependent and receptor-mediated intracellular calcium mobilization studies revealed a lack of desensitization. Functionally, the lack of desensitization resulted in increased cell growth and migration compared to the wild-type receptor, which was sensitive to MEK inhibition. These results highlight ßarrestin's crucial role in the maintenance of proper B2R signalling.     

Arrestin function in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis requires phosphoinositide binding

Internalization of agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors is mediated by non-visual arrestins, which also bind to clathrin and are therefore thought to act as adaptors in the endocytosis process. Phosphoinositides have been implicated in the regulation of intracellular receptor trafficking, and are known to bind to other coat components including AP-2, AP180 and COPI coatomer. Given these observations, we explored the possibility that phosphoinositides play a role in arrestin's function as an adaptor. High-affinity binding sites for phosphoinositides in beta-arrestin (arrestin2) and arrestin3 (beta-arrestin2) were identified, and dissimilar effects of phosphoinositide and inositol phosphate on arrestin interactions with clathrin and receptor were characterized. Alteration of three basic residues in arrestin3 abolished phosphoinositide binding with complete retention of clathrin and receptor binding. Unlike native protein, upon agonist activation, this mutant arrestin3 expressed in COS1 cells neither supported beta2-adrenergic receptor internalization nor did it concentrate in coated pits, although it was recruited to the plasma membrane. These findings indicate that phosphoinositide binding plays a critical regulatory role in delivery of the receptor-arrestin complex to coated pits, perhaps by providing, with activated receptor, a multi-point attachment of arrestin to the plasma membrane.     

Arrestin mobilizes signaling proteins to the cytoskeleton and redirects their activity

Arrestins regulate the activity and subcellular localization of G protein-coupled receptors and other signaling molecules. Here, we demonstrate that arrestins bind microtubules (MTs) in vitro and in vivo. The MT-binding site on arrestins overlaps significantly with the receptor-binding site, but the conformations of MT-bound and receptor-bound arrestin are different. Arrestins recruit ERK1/2 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 to MTs in cells, similar to the arrestin-dependent mobilization of these proteins to the receptor. Arrestin-mediated sequestration of ERK to MTs reduces the level of ERK activation. In contrast, recruitment of Mdm2 to MTs by arrestin channels Mdm2 activity toward cytoskeleton-associated proteins, increasing their ubiquitination dramatically. The mobilization of signaling molecules to MTs is a novel biological function of arrestin proteins.     

Evidence that calmodulin binding to the dopamine D2 receptor enhances receptor signaling

The Ca2+ sensor calmodulin (CaM) regulates numerous proteins involved in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. CaM binds directly to some GPCRs, including the dopamine D2 receptor. We confirmed that the third intracellular loop of the D2 receptor is a direct contact point for CaM binding using coimmunoprecipitation and a polyHis pull-down assay, and we determined that the D2-like receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT increased the colocalization of the D2 receptor and endogenous CaM in both 293 cells and in primary neostriatal cultures. The N-terminal three or four residues of D2-IC3 were required for the binding of CaM; mutation of three of these residues in the full-length receptor (I210C/K211C/I212C) decreased the coprecipitation of the D2 receptor and CaM and also significantly decreased D2 receptor signaling, without altering the coupling of the receptor to G proteins. Taken together, these findings suggest that binding of CaM to the dopamine D2 receptor enhances D2 receptor signaling.