Genotoxicity of six pesticides by Salmonella mutagenicity test and SOS chromotest

Two in vitro tests (Ames test and SOS chromotest), one for bacterial mutagenicity and one for primary DNA damage, were assayed to determine the genotoxic activity of 6 pesticides (atrazine, captafol, captan, chlorpyrifosmethyl, molinate and tetrachlorvinphos). Assays were carried out both in the absence and presence of S9 fractions of liver homogenate from rat (Sprague–Dawley) pretreated with Aroclor 1254. Captan and captafol were genotoxic on both the Ames test and the SOS chromotest. Comparisons with mutagenesis data in Salmonella indicated that the SOS assay detected as genotoxic the pesticides that were mutagenic on the Salmonella test. Non-genotoxic effects were not detected in vitro either in the Salmonella/microsome assay nor in the SOS chromotest when bacterial tester strains were exposed to atrazine, molinate, chlorpyrifosmethyl and tetrachlorvinphos in the absence or presence of S9 mix.     

Evaluation of industrial, hospital and domestic wastewater genotoxicity with the Salmonella fluctuation test and the SOS chromotest

An evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different wastewaters collected in the Rouen area was performed with the SOS chromotest (on Escherichia coli PQ37) and the Salmonella fluctuation test on Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 with or without metabolic activation. The samples were taken during two 1-week periods, one in January and one in April 2003. Six sites were selected for wastewater sampling in order to allow a comparative study between an area of mixed discharge (industrial, hospital and domestic) and an area of primarily domestic discharge. Out of a total of 71 daytime samples tested, 46 (65%) were positive in at least one assay: 22 samples out of 33 in January (67%), and 24 samples out of 38 in April (63%). The two genotoxicity tests have different sensitivities. Indeed, the Salmonella fluctuation test allowed the detection of 56% of the samples as genotoxic in January (18 out of 33), and 63% in April (24 out of 38) while the SOS chromotest allowed the detection of 18% of the samples as genotoxic, whatever the sampling period. The samples collected in domestic wastewater are at least as genotoxic as the samples collected in mixed wastewater. The possible source of the detected genotoxicity (industrial, hospital or domestic) is discussed. The results of this study show that the different types of wastewaters present a genotoxic risk. Additional studies should be undertaken in the analytical field in order to try to identify and quantify the compounds responsible for the genotoxicity. This difficult task will be necessary in order to identify the sources of toxicants and thus to take preventive and/or curative measures to limit the toxicity of the wastewater.     

Quinolone effects in the SOS chromotest and in the synthesis of biomacromolecules

The genotoxicity of quinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin) was studied on the selected mutantE. coli strain PQ37 (SOS chromotest). The genotoxicity was expressed by SOS-inducing potential (SOSIP) values. The highest SOSIP values were found with ciprofloxacin (SOSIP=1967 δIF/nmol), the lowest value was observed with nalidixic acid (SOSIP=0.3 ΔIF/nmol). Similar results were also found with the biosynthesis of nucleic acids, as indicated by incorporation of¹⁴C-adenine into TCA-insoluble fractions ofS. typhimurium cells (ciprofloxacin IC₅₀=0.39, nalidixic acid IC₅₀=400). DNA-damaging effects were tested in the absence of an exogenous metabolizing system.     

A comparison of the relative activities of 8 radiosensitizers in the SOS chromotest

Misonidazole, and RSU 1069 and 6 of its analogues are all reported to show increased cytotoxicity towards hypoxic cells compared to oxic cells. DNA is considered to be the target through which these drugs exert their cytotoxic activity. Therefore we monitored induction of the SOS response in uvrABC excinuclease proficient and deficient strains of E. coli, under oxic and hypoxic conditions, as an indirect method of assessing the activity of these drugs towards DNA in a biological system. This was done using the SOS chromotest which utilizes E. coli strains which possess a sfiA::lacZ fusion allowing induction of the SOS response to be monitored by assaying beta-galactosidase activity. All of the drugs tested here show some induction of the SOS response in both uvrABC excinuclease proficient and deficient strains. Data shown here suggests that the uvrABC excinuclease is important in the production of a SOS induction signal from RSU 1069-induced DNA lesions and that RSU 1069 may act as a crosslinking agent. The data also shows that SOS induction activity and toxicity do not necessarily correlate and that production of a SOS induction signal may occur via a different pathway for RSU 1069 than for its analogues.     

Impact of dimethyl sulfoxide and examples of combined genotoxicity in the SOS chromotest.

The bacterial SOS chromotest with Escherichia coli PQ37 was used for the assessment of genotoxicity of combined xenobiotic treatments. The modulation of test compound genotoxicity by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), a common solvent for test compounds, was assessed as well. It was shown that DMSO modulated SOS chromotest genotoxicity of several xenobiotics: in comparison to test compound dissolution in water, the commonly used addition of 3.2% (v/v) DMSO as solvent lead to a significant increase in the genotoxicity of K(2)RhCl(5) and beta-propiolactone (BPL). However, the effects of cisplatin decreased significantly when DMSO was added. Thus, albeit DMSO is not genotoxic in this test itself, it can interfere with SOS chromotest responses. Further experiments were performed in the absence of DMSO. BPL and cisplatin in combination showed an over-additive synergism in SOS genotoxicity as well as K(2)RhCl(5) and cisplatin did. Addition of Pd(NH(3))(4)Cl(2) and NaAsO(2), which are non-genotoxic in the SOS chromotest, did not enhance the K(2)RhCl(5)- or BPL-mediated SOS sfiA induction. Nevertheless, at the highest subcytotoxic dose of NaAsO(2) tested (200 microM), a slight yet significant suppression of BPL-mediated SOS genotoxicity was observed. These results confirm that the SOS chromotest is a useful tool for the rapid evaluation of the combined genotoxicity of compound mixtures. However, the use of DMSO as test solvent has to be taken with caution.     

The influence of organic solvents on estimates of genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity in the SOS chromotest

In this work, the toxicity and genotoxicity of organic solvents (acetone, carbon tetrachloride, dichloromethane, dimethylsulfoxide, ethanol, ether and methanol) were studied using the SOS chromotest. The influence of these solvents on the direct genotoxicity induced by the mutagens mitomycin C (MMC) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) were also investigated. None of the solvents were genotoxic in Escherichia coli PQ37. However, based on the inhibition of protein synthesis assessed by constitutive alkaline phosphatase activity, some solvents (carbon tetrachloride, dimethylsulfoxide, ethanol and ether) were toxic and incompatible with the SOS chromotest. Solvents that were neither toxic nor genotoxic to E. coli (acetone, dichloromethane and methanol) significantly reduced the genotoxicity of MMC and 4-NQO. When these solvents were used to dissolve vitamin E they increased the antigenotoxic activity of this compound, possibly through additive or synergistic effects. The relevance of these results is discussed in relation to antigenotoxic studies. These data indicate the need for careful selection of an appropriate diluent for the SOS chromotest since some solvents can modulate genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity.     

Genotoxicity of monofunctional methanesulphonates in the SOS chromotest as a function of alkylation mechanisms. A comparison with the mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA100

17 monofunctional methanesulphonates of widely varying structures were investigated in the SOS chromotest using the E. coli strain PQ37. All compounds tested were positive in this assay. The monofunctional methanesulphonates in general possess low SOSiP values. Five of the compounds tested i.e. iBMS, NpMS, 2 PhPMS, PkMS and 1,3-DC12PMS (for abbreviations see Table 1) did not show increasing beta-galactosidase activity and both the positive induction factors and the positive SOSiP values resulted from the toxicity correction as performed according to Quillardet and Hofnung (1985). In general methanesulphonates with a higher SN1 reactivity, in particular the secondary compounds, showed clear genotoxic activities whereas those possessing low SN1 reactivities (primary compounds) induced a low SOS repair indicating that the alkylation of O-atoms in the DNA bases contributes more to the induction of SOS repair in strain PQ37 than N-alkylations. The only exception was methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) which possessed a very high SN2 reactivity but a rather low SN1 reactivity. It had the highest SOSiP value of all tested methanesulphonates. No dependence of the genotoxicity on the SN2 reactivity could be found in this series. In general the phenyl-substituted methanesulphonates showed higher SOSiP values, which is presumably due to their relatively high SN1 reactivities and their relatively long life times in aqueous systems. There is a clear relationship between SN1 reactivities and the SOSiP values: the SOSiP values increase with rising SN1 reactivities reaching a maximum at iPMS after which the genotoxicities decrease due to the decreasing life times. The compounds with very high SN1 reactivities also possess very high hydrolysis rates. A good correlation could be established between the mutagenicities in S. typhimurium TA100 and the SOS chromotest (strain PQ37). Only 4 small deviations from this correlation could be found. The reasons for these deviations are discussed.     

Kinetic determination of enzymatic activity and modification of the metabolic activation system in the SOS chromotest

The "SOS Chromotest" has recently been introduced by P. Quillardet et al. (1982; Quillardet and Hofnung, 1985), who use strain PQ37 of Escherichia coli K12 to test for genotoxicity. We have modified the procedure in order to optimize the determination of beta-galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase activities, and, where possible, to allow measurements to be made automatically. Kinetic determination is quicker, more sensitive and avoids interference by coloured compounds. Modification of the metabolic activation system increases the sensitivity of the test for progenotoxicity.     

Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test

The methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella mutagenicity test were described previously (Ames et al., 1975b). The present paper is a revision of the methods. Two new tester strains, a frameshift strain (TA97) and a strain carrying an ochre mutation on a multicopy plasmid (TA102), are added to the standard tester set. TA97 replaces TA1537. TA1535 and TA1538 are removed from the recommended set but can be retained at the option of the investigator. TA98 and TA100 are retained. We discuss other special purpose strains and present some minor changes in procedure, principally in the growth, storage, and preservation of the tester strains. Two substitutions are made in diagnostic mutagens to eliminate MNNG and 9-aminoacridine. Some test modifications are discussed.     

Genotoxicity assessment of low-level doses of gamma radiation with the SOS chromotest and the Ames test

This is the first study to present data on the genotoxicity of low γ-irradiation doses for E. coli and S. typhimurium cells obtained using the SOS chromotest and the Ames test. The most pronounced effect was recorded in the first 24 h of γ-irradiation. After 72 h in the Ames test and after 96 h in the SOS chromotest, a significant effect of γ-irradiation on bacterial cells was detected. The absence of genotoxicity at the later stages can be explained by the adaptation of bacterial cells to the conditions of exposure. The findings allow the bacterial test system to be used for studying the effects of low doses at the early stages of exposure to radiation.