Structural and functional characterization of insulin receptor substrate proteins and the molecular mechanisms of their interaction with insulin superfamily tyrosine kinase receptors and effector proteins

The literature data on the role of IRS1/IRS2 proteins, endogenous substrates for insulin receptor tyrosine kinase, in transduction of signals generated by insulin superfamily peptides (insulin, insulin-like growth factor) were analyzed. The molecular mechanisms of the functional coupling of IRS proteins with peptide receptors possessing a tyrosine kinase activity and SH2 domain-containing proteins (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Grb2 adaptor protein, protein phosphotyrosine phosphatase) were discussed. The structural and functional properties of IRS proteins (distribution of functional domains and sites for tyrosine phosphorylation; conservatism of amino acid sequences) were characterized. The data on the alternative pathways of transduction of signals which are generated by insulin and related peptides and do not involve IRS proteins were analyzed. These pathways are realized through Shc proteins or via direct interaction between receptors and SH2 proteins. Amino acid sequences of IRS proteins and insulin superfamily tyrosine kinase receptors were compared. The homologous regions in IRS proteins and receptors, which can be responsible for their coupling with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein phosphotyrosine phosphatases, were identified.     

Insulin signalling: the role of insulin receptor substrate 1

The insulin receptor is a ligand-activated tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates its major substrate protein, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), at multiple sites. Tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS1 then serves as a docking/effector protein for at least four Src homology 2 (SH2)-domain proteins involved in signal transduction. This initial step in signalling distinguishes the insulin receptor from other receptor tyrosine kinases, which directly bind several SH2-domain proteins, and establishes IRS1 as a founding member of a group of proteins whose function is to link activated tyrosine kinases to SH2-domain proteins.     

Signal Transduction Cross Talk Mediated by Jun N-Terminal Kinase-Interacting Protein and Insulin Receptor Substrate Scaffold Protein Complexes

Scaffold proteins have been established as important mediators of signal transduction specificity. The insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins represent a critical group of scaffold proteins that are required for signal transduction by the insulin receptor, including the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase. The c-Jun NH₂-terminal kinase (JNK)-interacting proteins (JIPs) represent a different group of scaffold molecules that are implicated in the regulation of the JNK. These two signaling pathways are functionally linked because JNK can phosphorylate IRS1 on the negative regulatory site Ser-307. Here we demonstrate the physical association of these signaling pathways using a proteomic approach that identified insulin-regulated complexes of JIPs together with IRS scaffold proteins. Studies using mice with JIP scaffold protein defects confirm that the JIP1 and JIP2 proteins are required for normal glucose homeostasis. Together, these observations demonstrate that JIP proteins can influence insulin-stimulated signal transduction mediated by IRS proteins.The c-Jun NH₂-terminal kinase (JNK)-interacting proteins (JIPs) are implicated in the regulation of the JNK signal transduction pathway (8, 28). The JIP1 and JIP2 proteins are structurally related with similar modular domains (SH3 and PTB) and binding sites for the mixed-lineage protein kinase (MLK) group of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase kinases, the MAPK kinase MKK7, and JNK (19). These JIP proteins also interact with the microtubule motor protein kinesin, several guanine nucleotide exchange factors, the phosphatase MKP7, Src-related protein kinases, and AKT to form multifunctional protein complexes (19).One potential physiological role of JIP scaffold proteins is the response to metabolic stress, insulin resistance, and diabetes. Several lines of evidence support this hypothesis. First, JIP1 is required for metabolic stress-induced activation of JNK in white adipose tissue (12). Second, MLKs that interact with JIP proteins are implicated as essential components of a signaling pathway that mediates the effects of metabolic stress on JNK activation (13). Third, studies have demonstrated that the human Jip1 gene may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes, because a Jip1 missense mutation was found to segregate with type 2 diabetes (26). Collectively, these data suggest that JIP proteins play a role in the cellular response to metabolic stress and the regulation of insulin resistance.It is established that the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) group of scaffold proteins plays a central role in insulin signaling (27). Treatment of cells with insulin causes tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor, the recruitment of IRS proteins to the insulin receptor, and the subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS proteins on multiple residues that act as docking sites for insulin-regulated signaling molecules, including phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (27). Negative regulation of IRS proteins is implicated as a mechanism of insulin resistance and can be mediated by multiple pathways, including IRS protein phosphorylation and degradation. Thus, the mTOR/p70^S6K (21, 22, 24) and the SOCS-1/3 (20) signaling pathways can regulate IRS protein degradation. Multisite phosphorylation on Ser/Thr residues can also regulate IRS protein function, including JNK phosphorylation of IRS1 on the inhibitory site Ser-307 that prevents recruitment of IRS1 to the activated insulin receptor (2).The IRS and JIP groups of scaffold proteins may function independently to regulate JNK-dependent and insulin-dependent signal transduction. However, functional connections between these scaffold proteins have been identified. Thus, studies using Jip1^−/− mice demonstrate that JIP1 is required for high-fat-diet-induced JNK activation in white adipose tissue, IRS1 phosphorylation on the inhibitory site Ser-307, and insulin resistance (12). These data suggest that JIP scaffold proteins function cooperatively with IRS proteins to regulate signal transduction by the insulin receptor. The purpose of this study was to examine cross talk between the JIP and IRS scaffold complexes. We demonstrate that the JIP and IRS scaffold complexes physically interact in an insulin-dependent manner and confirm that JIP proteins influence normal glucose homeostasis.     

Attenuation of insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate-1 serine 307 phosphorylation in insulin resistance of type 2 diabetes

Insulin resistance is a primary characteristic of type 2 diabetes and likely causally related to the pathogenesis of the disease. It is a result of defects in signal transduction from the cell surface receptor of insulin to target effects. We found that insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of serine 307 (corresponding to serine 302 in the murine sequence) in the immediate downstream mediator protein of the insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS1), is required for efficient insulin signaling and that this phosphorylation is attenuated in adipocytes from patients with type 2 diabetes. Inhibition of serine 307 phosphorylation by rapamycin mimicked type 2 diabetes and reduced the sensitivity of IRS1 tyrosine phosphorylation in response to insulin, while stimulation of the phosphorylation by okadaic acid, in cells from patients with type 2 diabetes, rescued cells from insulin resistance. EC(50) for insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of serine 307 was about 0.2 nM with a t(1/2) of about 2 min. The amount of IRS1 was similar in cells from non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. These findings identify a molecular mechanism for insulin resistance in non-selected patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Inputs and outputs of insulin receptor

The insulin receptor (IR) is an important hub in insulin signaling and its activation is tightly regulated. Upon insulin stimulation, IR is activated through autophosphorylation, and consequently phosphorylates several insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins, including IRS1-6, Shc and Gab1. Certain adipokines have also been found to activate IR. On the contrary, PTP, Grb and SOCS proteins, which are responsible for the negative regulation of IR, are characterized as IR inhibitors. Additionally, many other proteins have been identified as IR substrates and participate in the insulin signaling pathway. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the signals mediated through IR, we reviewed the upstream and downstream signal molecules of IR, summarized the positive and negative modulators of IR, and discussed the IR substrates and interacting adaptor proteins. We propose that the molecular events associated with IR should be integrated to obtain a better understanding of the insulin signaling pathway and diabetes.     

From signal transduction to signal interpretation: an alternative model for the molecular function of insulin receptor substrates

The insulin receptor (IR) recruits adaptor proteins, so-called insulin receptor substrates (IRS), to connect with downstream signalling pathways. A family of IRS proteins was defined based on three major common structural elements: Amino-terminal PH and PTB domains that mediate protein-lipid or protein-protein interactions, mostly carboxy-terminal multiple tyrosine residues that serve as binding sites for proteins that contain one or more SH2 domains and serine/threonine-rich regions which may be recognized by negative regulators of insulin action. The current model for the role of IRS proteins therefore combines an adaptor function with the integration of mostly negative input from other signal transduction cascades allowing for modulation of signalling amplitude. In this review we propose an extended version of the adaptor model that can explain how signalling specificity could be implemented at the level of IRS proteins.     

Insulin signaling: mechanisms altered in insulin resistance

Insulin has a major anabolic function leading to storage of lipidic and glucidic substrates. All its effects result from insulin binding to a specific membrane receptor which is expressed at a high level on the 3 insulin target tissues: liver, adipose tissue and muscles. The insulin receptor exhibits a tyrosine-kinase activity which leads, first, to receptor autophosphorylation and then to tyrosine phosphorylation of substrates proteins, IRS proteins in priority. This leads to the formation of macromolecular complexes close to the receptor. The two main transduction pathways are the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase pathway activating protein kinase B which is involved in priority in metabolic effects, and the MAP kinase pathway involved in nuclear effects, proliferation and differentiation. However, in most cases, a specific effect of insulin requires the participation of the two pathways in a complex interplay which could explain the pleiotropy and the specificity of the insulin signal. The negative control of the insulin signal can result from hormone degradation or receptor dephosphorylation. However, the major negative control results from phosphorylation of serine/threonine residues on the receptor and/or IRS proteins. This phosphorylation is activated in response to different signals involved in insulin resistance, hyperinsulinism, TNFalpha or increased free fatty acids from adipose tissue, which are transformed inside the cell in acyl-CoA. A deleterious role for molecules issued from the adipose tissue is postulated in the resistance to insulin of the liver and muscles present in type 2 diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome.     

Common inhibitory serine sites phosphorylated by IRS-1 kinases, triggered by insulin and inducers of insulin resistance

The Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS) proteins are key players in insulin signal transduction and are the best studied targets of the insulin receptor. Ser/Thr phosphorylation of IRS proteins negatively modulates insulin signaling; therefore, the identification of IRS kinases and their target Ser phosphorylation sites is of physiological importance. Here we show that in Fao rat hepatoma cells, the IkappaB kinase beta (IKKbeta) is an IRS-1 kinase activated by selected inducers of insulin resistance, including sphingomyelinase, ceramide, and free fatty acids. Moreover, IKKbeta shares a repertoire of seven potential target sites on IRS-1 with protein kinase C zeta (PKCzeta), an IRS-1 kinase activated both by insulin and by inducers of insulin resistance. We further show that mutation of these seven sites (Ser-265, Ser-302, Ser-325, Ser-336, Ser-358, Ser-407, and Ser-408) confers protection from the action of IKKbeta and PKCzeta when they are overexpressed in Fao cells or primary hepatocytes. This enables the mutated IRS proteins to better propagate insulin signaling. These findings suggest that insulin-stimulated IRS kinases such as PKCzeta overlap with IRS kinases triggered by inducers of insulin resistance, such as IKKbeta, to phosphorylate IRS-1 on common Ser sites.     

Cysteine 647 in the insulin receptor is required for normal covalent interaction between alpha- and beta-subunits and signal transduction.

We have investigated the structural and functional properties of two mutant insulin receptors in which Cys647 and Cys682,683,685 have been replaced with Ser (IRS647 and IRS682,683,685, respectively). Compared with the wild-type receptor (IRWT), both mutant receptors displayed altered sensitivities to dithiothreitol with respect to insulin binding and reduction of oligomeric forms. Subunit composition of the oligomeric forms of the receptors as determined by two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of 125I-labeled receptors indicated that Cys682,683,685 are required for normal heterotetrameric structure and that Cys647 plays a major role in the normal covalent association of the alpha- and beta-subunits. Under nonreducing conditions, the affinity-labeled IRS647 migrated, almost exclusively, as a 230-kDa species which appeared to represent an alpha 2 form of the receptor. Furthermore, Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing IRS647 did not exhibit basal or insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation, suggesting that Cys647 is also required for signal transduction.     

Phosphorylation of IRS proteins, insulin action, and insulin resistance

Insulin signaling at target tissues is essential for growth and development and for normal homeostasis of glucose, fat, and protein metabolism. Control over this process is therefore tightly regulated. It can be achieved by a negative feedback control mechanism whereby downstream components inhibit upstream elements along the insulin-signaling pathway (autoregulation) or by signals from apparently unrelated pathways that inhibit insulin signaling thus leading to insulin resistance. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins on serine residues has emerged as a key step in these control processes under both physiological and pathological conditions. The list of IRS kinases implicated in the development of insulin resistance is growing rapidly, concomitant with the list of potential Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites in IRS proteins. Here, we review a range of conditions that activate IRS kinases to phosphorylate IRS proteins on "hot spot" domains. The flexibility vs. specificity features of this reaction is discussed and its characteristic as an "array" phosphorylation is suggested. Finally, its implications on insulin signaling, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, an emerging epidemic of the 21st century are outlined.     

Molecular mechanisms of insulin receptor substrate protein-mediated modulation of insulin signalling

The insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins act as important mediators of insulin action. Their regulation serves to augment the specificity of the insulin signalling cascade. They can be regulated--both positively and negatively--at the level of phosphorylation, and signalling through these proteins can be further modulated through the actions of SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signalling) proteins. Understanding the mechanisms of IRS regulation will provide further insight into the pathophysiology of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.     

Interaction of insulin receptor substrate 3 with insulin receptor, insulin receptor-related receptor, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and downstream signaling proteins.

Insulin receptor substrates (IRS) mediate biological actions of insulin, growth factors, and cytokines. All four mammalian IRS proteins contain pleckstrin homology (PH) and phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains at their N termini. However, the molecules diverge in their C-terminal sequences. IRS3 is considerably shorter than IRS1, IRS2, and IRS4, and is predicted to interact with a distinct group of downstream signaling molecules. In the present study, we investigated interactions of IRS3 with various signaling molecules. The PTB domain of mIRS3 is necessary and sufficient for binding to the juxtamembrane NPXpY motif of the insulin receptor in the yeast two-hybrid system. This interaction is stronger if the PH domain or the C-terminal phosphorylation domain is retained in the construct. As determined in a modified yeast two-hybrid system, mIRS3 bound strongly to the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Although high affinity interaction required the presence of at least two of the four YXXM motifs in mIRS3, there was not a requirement for specific YXXM motifs. mIRS3 also bound to SHP2, Grb2, Nck, and Shc, but less strongly than to p85. Studies in COS-7 cells demonstrated that deletion of either the PH or the PTB domain abolished insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of mIRS3. Insulin stimulation promoted the association of mIRS3 with p85, SHP2, Nck, and Shc. Despite weak association between mIRS3 and Grb2, this interaction was not increased by insulin, and may not be mediated by the SH2 domain of Grb2. Thus, in contrast to other IRS proteins, mIRS3 appears to have greater specificity for activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway rather than the Grb2/Ras pathway.     

Expression of insulin signalling components in the sensory epithelium of the human saccule

Several studies have demonstrated a link between diabetes and the dysfunction of the inner ear. Few studies, however, have reported the signalling mechanisms involved in metabolic control in human inner ear cells. Knowledge of the expression and role of the insulin receptor and downstream signalling components in the inner ear is sparce. Our immunohistochemistry approach has shown that the insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), protein kinase B (PKB) and insulin-sensitive glucose transporter (GLUT4) are expressed in the sensory epithelium of the human saccule, which also exhibits expression of a calcium-sensitive cAMP/cGMP phosphodiesterase 1C (PDE1C) and the vasopressin type 2 receptor. IRS1 and PDE1C are selectively expressed in sensory epithelial hair cells, whereas the other components are expressed in sensory epithelial supporting cells or in both cell types, as judged from co-expression or non-co-expression with glial fibrillary acidic protein, a marker for supporting cells. Furthermore, IRS1 appears to be localized in association with sensory nerves, whereas GLUT4 is expressed in the peri-nuclear area of stromal cells, as is the case for aquaporin 2. Thus, the insulin receptor, insulin signalling components and selected cAMP signalling components are expressed in the human saccule. In addition to well-known mechanisms of diabetes complications, such as neuropathy and vascular lesions, the expression of these proteins in the saccule could have a role in the observed link between diabetes and balance/hearing disorders.     

Insulin receptor substrate 4 supports insulin- and interleukin 4-stimulated proliferation of hematopoietic cells.

Signaling from the activated insulin receptor is initiated by its tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrates (IRSs). The IRSs then act as docking/effector proteins for various signaling proteins containing src homology 2 domains. Four members of the IRS family, designated IRS-1 through IRS-4, have been identified. Although these IRSs show considerable structural homology, the extent to which they overlap in functions has not been explored in detail. The 32D hematopoietic cell line, which contains no detectable amounts of any IRS, provides a system in which to determine whether an IRS supports cell proliferation. Previous studies have shown that introduction of IRS-1 or -2 into 32D cells overexpressing the insulin and IL-4 receptors (32D-R cells) enables the cells to undergo mitogenesis in response to insulin and IL-4. In the present study, we have examined IRS-4, a member of the IRS family that we recently discovered, in this system. Expression of IRS-4 in 32D-R cells permitted the cells to undergo mitogenesis and continuous proliferation in response to insulin and IL-4. Immunoblotting of phosphotyrosine proteins showed that insulin and IL-4 elicited the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-4 in these cells. Thus, IRS-4, like IRS-1 and -2, can function in the signal transduction pathways linking insulin and IL-4 receptors to cell proliferation.     

53BP2S, interacting with insulin receptor substrates, modulates insulin signaling

It is well known that insulin receptor substrates (IRS) act as a mediator for signal transduction of insulin, insulin-like growth factors, and several cytokines. To identify proteins that interact with IRS and modulate IRS-mediated signals, we performed yeast two-hybrid screening with IRS-1 as bait. Out of 109 cDNA-positive clones identified from a human placental cDNA library, two clones encoded 53BP2, p53-binding protein 2 (53BP2S), a short form splicing variant of the apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 that possesses Src homology region 3 domain, and ankyrin repeats domain, and had been reported to interact with p53, Bcl-2, and NF-kappaB. Interaction of 53BP2S with IRS-1 was confirmed by glutathione S-transferase pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation assays in COS-7 cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The Src homology region 3 domain and ankyrin repeats domain of 53BP2S were responsible for its interaction with IRS-1, whereas the phosphotyrosine binding domain and a central domain (amino acid residues 750-861) of IRS-1 were required for its interaction with 53BP2S. In CHO-C400 cells, expression of 53BP2S reduced insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation with a concomitant enhancement of IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation. In addition, the amount of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory p85 subunit associated with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, and activation of Akt was enhanced by 53BP2S expression. Although 53BP2S also enhanced Akt activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, insulin-induced glucose transporter 4 translocation was markedly inhibited in accordance with reduction of insulin-induced AS160 phosphorylation. Together these data demonstrate that 53BP2S interacts and modulates the insulin signals mediated by IRSs.     

Berberine inhibits PTP1B activity and mimics insulin action

Type 2 diabetes patients show defects in insulin signal transduction that include lack of insulin receptor, decrease in insulin stimulated receptor tyrosine kinase activity and receptor-mediated phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrates (IRSs). A small molecule that could target insulin signaling would be of significant advantage in the treatment of diabetes. Berberine (BBR) has recently been shown to lower blood glucose levels and to improve insulin resistance in db/db mice partly through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling and induction of phosphorylation of insulin receptor (IR). However, the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here we report that BBR mimics insulin action by increasing glucose uptake ability by 3T3-L1 adipocytes and L6 myocytes in an insulin-independent manner, inhibiting phosphatase activity of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), and increasing phosphorylation of IR, IRS1 and Akt in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In diabetic mice, BBR lowers hyperglycemia and improves impaired glucose tolerance, but does not increase insulin release and synthesis. The results suggest that BBR represents a different class of anti-hyperglycemic agents.     

Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B deficiency reduces insulin resistance and the diabetic phenotype in mice with polygenic insulin resistance

Mice heterozygous for insulin receptor (IR) and IR substrate (IRS)-1 deficiency provide a model of polygenic type 2 diabetes in which early-onset, genetically programmed insulin resistance leads to diabetes. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) dephosphorylates tyrosine residues in IR and possibly IRS proteins, thereby inhibiting insulin signaling. Mice lacking PTP1B are lean and have increased insulin sensitivity. To determine whether PTP1B can modify polygenic insulin resistance, we crossed PTP1B-/- mice with mice with a double heterozygous deficiency of IR and IRS-1 alleles (DHet). DHet mice weighed slightly less than wild-type mice and exhibited severe insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, with approximately 35% of DHet males developing diabetes by 9-10 weeks of age. Body weight in DHet mice with PTP1B deficiency was similar to that in DHet mice. However, absence of PTP1B in DHet mice markedly improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity at 10-11 weeks of age and reduced the incidence of diabetes and hyperplastic pancreatic islets at 6 months of age. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of IR, IRS proteins, Akt/protein kinase B, glycogen synthase kinase 3beta, and p70(S6K) was impaired in DHet mouse muscle and liver and was differentially improved by PTP1B deficiency. In addition, increased phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase expression in DHet mouse liver was reversed by PTP1B deficiency. In summary, PTP1B deficiency reduces insulin resistance and hyperglycemia without altering body weight in a model of polygenic type 2 diabetes. Thus, even in the setting of high genetic risk for diabetes, reducing PTP1B is partially protective, further demonstrating its attractiveness as a target for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

Fluidity of insulin action

Unlike the intensive research in pursuit of understanding the molecular mechanisms of insulin signaling and resistance to its biological action associated most significantly with obesity and type 2 diabetes, the influence of the plasma membrane on insulin sensitivity has been intermittently studied over the years—mainly because it was thought that mediators of insulin action, such as the insulin receptor and the insulin-responsive glucose transporter GLUT4, localize more or less uniformly in the lipids that form cell membranes. Recent insights into membrane physiology suggest that the plasma membrane impacts the function of membrane proteins mediating insulin action. Furthermore, membrane disturbances may be the basis of insulin resistance. Relevant insulin signal transduction data in terms of plasma membrane and insulin resistance are the focus of this review. The discussion visits the cell membrane hypothesis of insulin resistance that suggests insulin action could be related to changes in cell membrane properties.     

Insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 but not Shc can activate the insulin receptor independent of insulin and induce proliferation in CHO-IR cells

Ligand-activated insulin receptor (IR) attracts and phosphorylates various substrates such as insulin receptor substrates 1-4 (IRS) and Shc. To investigate how binding affinity for substrate affects signalling we generated chimeric receptors with the beta-chain of the insulin receptor containing NPXY motives with different affinities for receptor substrates. We found that the extent of receptor tyrosine phosphorylation positively correlates with binding affinity towards IRS1/2 but not towards Shc. Moreover, overexpression of IRS1 or IRS2 but not of Shc increased IR tyrosine phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner, also independent of insulin. Molecular truncations of IRS1 revealed that neither the isolated PH and PTB domains nor the C-terminus with the tyrosine phosphorylation sites alone are sufficient for substrate-dependent receptor activation. Overexpression of IRS1 and IRS2 impaired insulin-induced internalization of the IR in a dose-dependent manner suggesting that IRS proteins prevent endosome-associated receptor dephosphorylation/inactivation. IRS1 and IRS2 could therefore target the activated IR to different cellular compartments. Overexpression of IRS1 and IRS2 inhibited insulin-stimulated activation of the MAP kinases Erk1/2 while it increased/induced activation of Akt/PKB. Finally, overexpression of IRS1 and IRS2 but not of Shc induced DNA synthesis in starved CHO-IR cells independent of exogenous growth factors. Our results demonstrate that variations in cellular IRS1 and IRS2 concentration affect insulin signalling both upstream and downstream and that IRS proteins could play instructive rather than just permissive roles in signal transmission.     

A BRET assay for monitoring insulin receptor interactions and ligand pharmacology

The insulin receptor (IR) belongs to the receptor tyrosine kinase super family and plays an important role in glucose homeostasis. The receptor interacts with several large docking proteins that mediate signaling from the receptor, including the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) family and Src homology-2-containing proteins (Src). Here, we applied the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer 2 (BRET2) technique to study the IR signaling pathways. The interaction between the IR and the substrates IRS1, IRS4 and Shc was examined in response to ligands with different signaling properties. The association between IR and the interacting partners could successfully be monitored when co-expressing green fluorescent protein 2 (GFP2) tagged substrates with Renilla reniformis luciferase 8 (Rluc8) tagged IR. Through additional optimization steps, we developed a stable and flexible BRET2 assay for monitoring the interactions between the IR and its substrates. Furthermore, the insulin analogue X10 was characterized in the BRET2 assay and was found to be 10 times more potent with respect to IRS1, IRS4 and Shc recruitment compared to human insulin. This study demonstrates that the BRET2 technique can be applied to study IR signaling pathways, and that this assay can be used as a platform for screening and characterization of IR ligands.