Actin filament uncapping localizes to ruffling lamellae and rocketing vesicles

Regulated actin filament assembly is critical for eukaryotic cell physiology. Actin filaments are polar structures, and those with free high affinity or barbed ends are crucial for actin dynamics and cell motility. Actin filament barbed-end-capping proteins inhibit filament elongation after binding, and their regulated disassociation is proposed to provide a source of free filament ends to drive processes dependent on actin polymerization. To examine whether dissociation of actin filament capping proteins occurs with the correct spatio-temporal constraints to contribute to regulated actin assembly in live cells, I measured the dissociation of an actin capping protein, gelsolin, from actin in cells using a variation of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Uncapping was found to occur in cells at sites of active actin assembly, including protruding lamellae and rocketing vesicles, with the correct spatio-temporal properties to provide sites of actin filament polymerization during protrusion. These observations are consistent with models where uncapping of existing filaments provides sites of actin filament elongation.     

Role of cofilin in epidermal growth factor-stimulated actin polymerization and lamellipod protrusion

Stimulation of metastatic MTLn3 cells with epidermal growth factor (EGF) causes a rapid and transient increase in actin nucleation activity resulting from the appearance of free barbed ends at the extreme leading edge of extending lamellipods. To investigate the role of cofilin in EGF-stimulated actin polymerization and lamellipod extension in MTLn3 cells, we examined in detail the temporal and spatial distribution of cofilin relative to free barbed ends and characterized the actin dynamics by measuring the changes in the number of actin filaments. EGF stimulation triggers a transient increase in cofilin in the leading edge near the membrane, which is precisely cotemporal with the appearance of free barbed ends there. A deoxyribonuclease I binding assay shows that the number of filaments per cell increases by 1.5-fold after EGF stimulation. Detection of pointed ends in situ using deoxyribonuclease I binding demonstrates that this increase in the number of pointed ends is confined to the leading edge compartment, and does not occur within stress fibers or in the general cytoplasm. Using a light microscope severing assay, cofilin's severing activity was observed directly in cell extracts and shown to be activated after stimulation of the cells with EGF. Microinjection of function-blocking antibodies against cofilin inhibits the appearance of free barbed ends at the leading edge and lamellipod protrusion after EGF stimulation. These results support a model in which EGF stimulation recruits cofilin to the leading edge where its severing activity is activated, leading to the generation of short actin filaments with free barbed ends that participate in the nucleation of actin polymerization.     

Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility

Cell motility requires lamellipodial protrusion, a process driven by actin polymerization. Ena/VASP proteins accumulate in protruding lamellipodia and promote the rapid actin-driven motility of the pathogen Listeria. In contrast, Ena/VASP negatively regulate cell translocation. To resolve this paradox, we analyzed the function of Ena/VASP during lamellipodial protrusion. Ena/VASP-deficient lamellipodia protruded slower but more persistently, consistent with their increased cell translocation rates. Actin networks in Ena/VASP-deficient lamellipodia contained shorter, more highly branched filaments compared to controls. Lamellipodia with excess Ena/VASP contained longer, less branched filaments. In vitro, Ena/VASP promoted actin filament elongation by interacting with barbed ends, shielding them from capping protein. We conclude that Ena/VASP regulates cell motility by controlling the geometry of actin filament networks within lamellipodia.     

Visualization of actin polymerization in invasive structures of macrophages and carcinoma cells using photoconvertible β-actin-Dendra2 fusion proteins

Actin polymerization controls a range of cellular processes, from intracellular trafficking to cell motility and invasion. Generation and elongation of free barbed ends defines the regions of actively polymerizing actin in cells and, consequently, is of importance in the understanding of the mechanisms through which actin dynamics are regulated. Herein we present a method that does not involve cell permeabilization and provides direct visualization of growing barbed ends using photoswitchable β-actin-Dendra2 constructs expressed in murine macrophage and rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines. The method exploits the ability of photoconverted (red) G-actin species to become incorporated into pre-existing (green) actin filaments, visualized in two distinct wavelengths using TIRF microscopy. In growing actin filaments, photoconverted (red) monomers are added to the barbed end while only green monomers are recycled from the pointed end. We demonstrate that incorporation of actin into intact podosomes of macrophages occurs constitutively and is amenable to inhibition by cytochalasin D indicating barbed end incorporation. Additionally, actin polymerization does not occur in quiescent invadopodial precursors of carcinoma cells suggesting that the filaments are capped and following epidermal growth factor stimulation actin incorporation occurs in a single but extended peak. Finally, we show that Dendra2 fused to either the N- or the C-terminus of β-actin profoundly affects its localization and incorporation in distinct F-actin structures in carcinoma cells, thus influencing the ability of monomers to be photoconverted. These data support the use of photoswitchable actin-Dendra2 constructs as powerful tools in the visualization of free barbed ends in living cells.     

The role of actin turnover in retrograde actin network flow in neuronal growth cones

The balance of actin filament polymerization and depolymerization maintains a steady state network treadmill in neuronal growth cones essential for motility and guidance. Here we have investigated the connection between depolymerization and treadmilling dynamics. We show that polymerization-competent barbed ends are concentrated at the leading edge and depolymerization is distributed throughout the peripheral domain. We found a high-to-low G-actin gradient between peripheral and central domains. Inhibiting turnover with jasplakinolide collapsed this gradient and lowered leading edge barbed end density. Ultrastructural analysis showed dramatic reduction of leading edge actin filament density and filament accumulation in central regions. Live cell imaging revealed that the leading edge retracted even as retrograde actin flow rate decreased exponentially. Inhibition of myosin II activity before jasplakinolide treatment lowered baseline retrograde flow rates and prevented leading edge retraction. Myosin II activity preferentially affected filopodial bundle disassembly distinct from the global effects of jasplakinolide on network turnover. We propose that growth cone retraction following turnover inhibition resulted from the persistence of myosin II contractility even as leading edge assembly rates decreased. The buildup of actin filaments in central regions combined with monomer depletion and reduced polymerization from barbed ends suggests a mechanism for the observed exponential decay in actin retrograde flow. Our results show that growth cone motility is critically dependent on continuous disassembly of the peripheral actin network.     

How is actin polymerization nucleated in vivo?

Actin polymerization in vivo is dependent on free barbed ends that act as nuclei. Free barbed ends can arise in vivo by nucleation from the Arp2/3 complex, uncapping of barbed ends on pre-existing filaments or severing of filaments by cofilin. There is evidence that each mechanism operates in cells. However, different cell types use different combinations of these processes to generate barbed ends during stimulated cell motility. Here, I describe recent attempts to define the relative contributions of these three mechanisms to actin nucleation in vivo. The rapid increase in the number of barbed ends during stimulation is not due to any single mechanism. Cooperation between capping proteins, cofilin and the Arp2/3 complex is necessary for the development of protrusive force at the leading edge of the cell: uncapping and cofilin severing contributing barbed ends, whereas activity of the Arp2/3 complex is necessary, but not sufficient, for lamellipod extension. These results highlight the need for new methods that enable the direct observation of actin nucleation and so define precisely the relative contributions of the three processes to stimulated cell motility.     

A model for actin-filament length distribution in a lamellipod

A mathematical model is derived to describe the distributions of lengths of cytoskeletal actin filaments, along a 1 D transect of the lamellipod (or along the axis of a filopod) in an animal cell. We use the facts that actin filament barbed ends are aligned towards the cell membrane and that these ends grow rapidly in the presence of actin monomer as long as they are uncapped. Once a barbed end is capped, its filament tends to be degraded by fragmentation or depolymerization. Both the growth (by polymerization) and the fragmentation by actin-cutting agents are depicted in the model, which takes into account the dependence of cutting probability on the position along a filament. It is assumed that barbed ends are capped rapidly away from the cell membrane. The model consists of a system of discrete-integro-PDE's that describe the densities of barbed filament ends as a function of spatial position and length of their actin filament “tails”. The population of capped barbed ends and their trailing filaments is similarly represented. This formulation allows us to investigate hypotheses about the fragmentation and polymerization of filaments in a caricature of the lamellipod and compare theoretical and observed actin density profiles. Received: 19 May 2000 / Revised version: 12 March 2001 / Published online: 19 September 2001     

Capping Protein Terminates but Does Not Initiate Chemoattractant-induced Actin Assembly in Dictyostelium

The first step in the directed movement of cells toward a chemotactic source involves the extension of pseudopods initiated by the focal nucleation and polymerization of actin at the leading edge of the cell. We have previously isolated a chemoattractant-regulated barbed-end capping activity from Dictyostelium that is uniquely associated with capping protein, also known as cap32/34. Although uncapping of barbed ends by capping protein has been proposed as a mechanism for the generation of free barbed ends after stimulation, in vitro and in situ analysis of the association of capping protein with the actin cytoskeleton after stimulation reveals that capping protein enters, but does not exit, the cytoskeleton during the initiation of actin polymerization. Increased association of capping protein with regions of the cell containing free barbed ends as visualized by exogenous rhodamine-labeled G-actin is also observed after stimulation. An approximate threefold increase in the number of filaments with free barbed ends is accompanied by increases in absolute filament number, whereas the average filament length remains constant. Therefore, a mechanism in which preexisting filaments are uncapped by capping protein, in response to stimulation leading to the generation of free barbed ends and filament elongation, is not supported. A model for actin assembly after stimulation, whereby free barbed ends are generated by either filament severing or de novo nucleation is proposed. In this model, exposure of free barbed ends results in actin assembly, followed by entry of free capping protein into the actin cytoskeleton, which acts to terminate, not initiate, the actin polymerization transient.     

High microfilament concentration results in barbed-end ADP caps.

Current theory and experiments describing actin polymerization suggest that site-specific cleavage of bound nucleotide following F-actin filament formation causes the barbed ends of microfilaments to be capped first with ATP subunits, then with ADP bound to inorganic phosphate (ADP.Pi) at steady-state. The barbed ends of depolymerizing filaments consist of ADP subunits. The decrease in stability of the barbed-end cap accompanying the transition from ADP.Pi to ADP allows nucleotide hydrolysis and subsequent loss of Pi to regulate F-actin filament dynamics. We describe a novel computational model of nucleotide capping that simulates both the spatial and temporal properties of actin polymerization. This model has been used to test the effects of high filament concentration on the behavior of the ATP hydrolysis cycle observed during polymerization. The model predicts that under conditions of high microfilament concentration an ADP cap can appear during steady-state at the barbed ends of filaments. We show that the presence of the cap can be accounted for by a kinetic model and predict the relationship between the nucleotide concentration ratio [ATP]/[ADP], the F-actin filament concentration, and the steady-state distribution of barbed-end ADP cap lengths. The possible consequences of this previously unreported phenomenon as a regulator of cytoskeletal behavior are discussed.     

Pointed-end capping by tropomodulin3 negatively regulates endothelial cell motility

Actin filament pointed-end dynamics are thought to play a critical role in cell motility, yet regulation of this process remains poorly understood. We describe here a previously uncharacterized tropomodulin (Tmod) isoform, Tmod3, which is widely expressed in human tissues and is present in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1). Tmod3 is present in sufficient quantity to cap pointed ends of actin filaments, localizes to actin filament structures in HMEC-1 cells, and appears enriched in leading edge ruffles and lamellipodia. Transient overexpression of GFP-Tmod3 leads to a depolarized cell morphology and decreased cell motility. A fivefold increase in Tmod3 results in an equivalent decrease in free pointed ends in the cells. Unexpectedly, a decrease in the relative amounts of F-actin, free barbed ends, and actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex in lamellipodia are also observed. Conversely, decreased expression of Tmod3 by RNA interference leads to faster average cell migration, along with increases in free pointed and barbed ends in lamellipodial actin filaments. These data collectively demonstrate that capping of actin filament pointed ends by Tmod3 inhibits cell migration and reveal a novel control mechanism for regulation of actin filaments in lamellipodia.     

Kinetic evidence for insertion of actin monomers between the barbed ends of actin filaments and barbed end-bound insertin, a protein purified from smooth muscle

An actin polymerization-retarding protein was isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle. This protein copurified with vinculin on DEAE-cellulose and gel filtration columns. The polymerization-retarding protein could be separated from vinculin by hydroxylapatite chromatography. The isolated polymerization-retarding protein lost its activity within a few days, but was stable for weeks when it was not separated from vinculin. We termed the polymerization-retarding protein "insertin". Because of the instability of the isolated insertin, we investigated the effect of insertin-vinculin on actin polymerization. Insertin-vinculin retarded nucleated actin polymerization maximally fivefold. Polymerization at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped actin filaments was not affected by insertin-vinculin, suggesting that insertin-vinculin binds to the barbed ends, but not to the pointed ends, of actin filaments. Retarded polymerization was observed even if the actin monomer concentration was between the critical concentrations of the ends of treadmilling actin filaments. As at this low monomer concentration the pointed ends depolymerize, monomers appeared to be inserted at the barbed ends between the terminal subunit and barbed end-bound insertin molecules. Insertin-vinculin was found not to increase the actin monomer concentration to the value of the pointed ends. These observations support the conclusion that insertin is not a barbed end-capping protein but an actin monomer-inserting protein. According to a quantitative analysis of the kinetic data, all observations could be explained by a model in which two insertin molecules were assumed to bind co-operatively to the barbed ends of actin filaments. Actin monomers were found to be inserted between the barbed ends and barbed end-bound insertin molecules at a rate of about 1 x 10(6) M-1 s-1. Insertin may be an essential part of the machinery of molecules that permit treadmilling of actin filaments in living cells by insertion of actin molecules between membranes and actin filaments.     

Modeling the Synergy of Cofilin and Arp2/3 in Lamellipodial Protrusive Activity

Rapid polymerization of actin filament barbed ends generates protrusive forces at the cell edge, leading to cell migration. Two important regulators of free barbed ends, cofilin and Arp2/3, have been shown to work in synergy (net effect greater than additive). To explore this synergy, we model the dynamics of F-actin at the leading edge, motivated by data from EGF-stimulated mammary carcinoma cells. We study how synergy depends on the localized rates and relative timing of cofilin and Arp2/3 activation at the cell edge. The model incorporates diffusion of cofilin, membrane protrusion, F-actin capping, aging, and severing by cofilin and branch nucleation by Arp2/3 (but not G-actin recycling). In a well-mixed system, cofilin and Arp2/3 can each generate a large pulse of barbed ends on their own, but have little synergy; high synergy occurs only at low activation rates, when few barbed ends are produced. In the full spatially distributed model, both synergy and barbed-end production are significant over a range of activation rates. Furthermore, barbed-end production is greatest when Arp2/3 activation is delayed relative to cofilin. Our model supports a direct role for cofilin-mediated actin polymerization in stimulated cell migration, including chemotaxis and cancer invasion.     

Modeling the Synergy of Cofilin and Arp2/3 in Lamellipodial Protrusive Activity

Rapid polymerization of actin filament barbed ends generates protrusive forces at the cell edge, leading to cell migration. Two important regulators of free barbed ends, cofilin and Arp2/3, have been shown to work in synergy (net effect greater than additive). To explore this synergy, we model the dynamics of F-actin at the leading edge, motivated by data from EGF-stimulated mammary carcinoma cells. We study how synergy depends on the localized rates and relative timing of cofilin and Arp2/3 activation at the cell edge. The model incorporates diffusion of cofilin, membrane protrusion, F-actin capping, aging, and severing by cofilin and branch nucleation by Arp2/3 (but not G-actin recycling). In a well-mixed system, cofilin and Arp2/3 can each generate a large pulse of barbed ends on their own, but have little synergy; high synergy occurs only at low activation rates, when few barbed ends are produced. In the full spatially distributed model, both synergy and barbed-end production are significant over a range of activation rates. Furthermore, barbed-end production is greatest when Arp2/3 activation is delayed relative to cofilin. Our model supports a direct role for cofilin-mediated actin polymerization in stimulated cell migration, including chemotaxis and cancer invasion.     

Rho-family GTPases require the Arp2/3 complex to stimulate actin polymerization in Acanthamoeba extracts

BACKGROUND: Actin filaments polymerize in vivo primarily from their fast-growing barbed ends. In cells and extracts, GTPgammaS and Rho-family GTPases, including Cdc42, stimulate barbed-end actin polymerization; however, the mechanism responsible for the initiation of polymerization is unknown. There are three formal possibilities for how free barbed ends may be generated in response to cellular signals: uncapping of existing filaments; severing of existing filaments; or de novo nucleation. The Arp2/3 complex localizes to regions of dynamic actin polymerization, including the leading edges of motile cells and motile actin patches in yeast, and in vitro it nucleates the formation of actin filaments with free barbed ends. Here, we investigated actin polymerization in soluble extracts of Acanthamoeba. RESULTS: Addition of actin filaments with free barbed ends to Acanthamoeba extracts is sufficient to induce polymerization of endogenous actin. Addition of activated Cdc42 or activation of Rho-family GTPases in these extracts by the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog GTPgammaS stimulated barbed-end polymerization, whereas immunodepletion of Arp2 or sequestration of Arp2 using solution-binding antibodies blocked Rho-family GTPase-induced actin polymerization. CONCLUSIONS: For this system, we conclude that the accessibility of free barbed ends regulates actin polymerization, that Rho-family GTPases stimulate polymerization catalytically by de novo nucleation of free barbed ends and that the primary nucleation factor in this pathway is the Arp2/3 complex.     

Nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin caps actin filaments

The effect of nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin on the polymerization of nonmuscle actin was investigated in order to clarify whether nonmuscle actin is converted into a capping protein by ADP-ribosylation. ADP-ribosylated actin was found to decrease the rate of polymerization of actin filaments which are free at both ends. ADP-ribosylated actin turned out to have no effect on the rate or extent of polymerization at the pointed ends of actin filaments the barbed ends of which were capped by gelsolin. The monomer concentration reached at the final stage of polymerization was similar to the critical concentration of the pointed ends of actin filaments. The results suggest that nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin acts as a capping protein which binds to the barbed ends to inhibit polymerization.     

Occurrence of an actin-inserting domain in tensin.

We have previously described a protein called "insertin" that binds strongly to barbed ends of actin filaments and permits polymerization of actin filaments by insertion of actin monomers between the barbed ends and barbed end-bound insertin. We determined the amino acid sequence of insertin and found that the primary structure of insertin is almost identical to amino acid residues 862 to 1212 of the actin-binding protein tensin.     

The physics of filopodial protrusion

Filopodium, a spike-like actin protrusion at the leading edge of migrating cells, functions as a sensor of the local environment and has a mechanical role in protrusion. We use modeling to examine mechanics and spatial-temporal dynamics of filopodia. We find that >10 actin filaments have to be bundled to overcome the membrane resistance and that the filopodial length is limited by buckling for 10-30 filaments and by G-actin diffusion for >30 filaments. There is an optimal number of bundled filaments, approximately 30, at which the filopodial length can reach a few microns. The model explains characteristic interfilopodial distance of a few microns as a balance of initiation, lateral drift, and merging of the filopodia. The theory suggests that F-actin barbed ends have to be focused and protected from capping (the capping rate has to decrease one order of magnitude) once every hundred seconds per micron of the leading edge to initiate the observed number of filopodia. The model generates testable predictions about how filopodial length, rate of growth, and interfilopodial distance should depend on the number of bundled filaments, membrane resistance, lamellipodial protrusion rate, and G-actin diffusion coefficient.     

The F-actin side binding activity of the Arp2/3 complex is essential for actin nucleation and lamellipod extension

Most eukaryotic cells rely on localized actin polymerization to generate and sustain the protrusion activity necessary for cell movement [1, 2]. Such protrusions are often in the form of a flat lamellipod with a leading edge composed of a dense network of actin filaments [3, 4]. The Arp2/3 complex localizes within that network in vivo [3, 4] and nucleates actin polymerization and generates a branched network of actin filaments in vitro [5-7]. The complex has thus been proposed to generate the actin network at the leading edge of crawling cells in vivo [3, 4, 8]. However, the relative contributions of nucleation and branching to protrusive force are still unknown. We prepared antibodies to the p34 subunit of the Arp2/3 complex that selectively inhibit side binding of the complex to F-actin. We demonstrate that side binding is required for efficient nucleation and branching by the Arp2/3 complex in vitro. However, microinjection of these antibodies into cells specifically inhibits lamellipod extension without affecting the EGF-stimulated appearance of free barbed ends in situ. These results indicate that while the side binding activity of the Arp2/3 complex is required for nucleation in vitro and for protrusive force in vivo, it is not required for EGF-stimulated increases in free barbed ends in vivo. This suggests that the branching activity of the Arp2/3 complex is essential for lamellipod extension, while the generation of nucleation sites for actin polymerization is not sufficient.     

Processive capping by formin suggests a force-driven mechanism of actin polymerization

Regulation of actin polymerization is essential for cell functioning. Here, we predict a novel phenomenon-the force-driven polymerization of actin filaments mediated by proteins of the formin family. Formins localize to the barbed ends of actin filaments, but, in contrast to the standard capping proteins, allow for actin polymerization in the barbed direction. First, we show that the mechanism of such "leaky capping" can be understood in terms of the elasticity of the formin molecules. Second, we demonstrate that if a pulling force acts on the filament end via the leaky cap, the elastic stresses can drive actin polymerization. We estimate that a moderate pulling force of approximately 3.4 pN is sufficient to reduce the critical actin concentration required for barbed end polymerization by an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the pulling force increases the polymerization rate. The suggested mechanism of force-driven polymerization could be a key element in a variety of cellular mechanosensing devices.     

Tropomyosin regulates elongation by formin at the fast-growing end of the actin filament

The balance between dynamic and stable actin filaments is essential for the regulation of cellular functions including the determination of cell shape and polarity, cell migration, and cytokinesis. Proteins that regulate polymerization at the filament ends and filament stability confer specificity to actin filament structure and cellular function. The dynamics of the barbed, fast-growing end of the filament are controlled in space and time by both positive and negative regulators of actin polymerization. Capping proteins inhibit the addition and loss of subunits, whereas other proteins, including formins, bind at the barbed end and allow filament growth. In this work, we show that tropomyosin regulates dynamics at the barbed end. Tropomyosin binds to constructs of FRL1 and mDia2 that contain the FH2 domain and modulates formin-dependent capping of the barbed end by relieving inhibition of elongation by FRL1-FH1FH2, mDia1-FH2, and mDia2-FH2 in an isoform-dependent fashion. In this role, tropomyosin functions as an activator of formin. Tropomyosin also inhibits the binding of FRL1-FH1FH2 to the sides of actin filaments independent of the isoform. In contrast, tropomyosin does not affect the ability of capping protein to block the barbed end. We suggest that tropomyosin and formin act together to ensure the formation of unbranched actin filaments, protected from severing, that could be capped in stable cellular structures. This role, in addition to its cooperative control of myosin function, establishes tropomyosin as a universal regulator of the multifaceted actin cytoskeleton.