Rumex acetosa Y chromosomes: constitutive or facultative heterochromatin?

Condensed Y chromosomes in Rumex acetosa L. root-tip nuclei were studied using 5-azaC treatment and immunohistochemical detection of methylated histones. Although Y chromosomes were decondensed within root meristem in vivo, they became condensed and heteropycnotic in roots cultured in vitro. 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) treatment of cultured roots caused transitional dispersion of their Y chromosome bodies, but 7 days after removal of the drug from the culture medium, Y heterochromatin recondensed and again became visible. The response of Rumex sex chromatin to 5-azaC was compared with that of condensed segments of pericentromeric heterochromatin in Rhoeo spathacea (Sw.) Steam roots. It was shown that Rhoeo chromocentres, composed of AT-rich constitutive heterochromatin, did not undergo decondensation after 5-azaC treatment. The Y-bodies observed within male nuclei of R. acetosa were globally enriched with H3 histone, demethylated at lysine 4 and methylated at lysine 9. This is the first report of histone tail-modification in condensed sex chromatin in plants. Our results suggest that the interphase condensation of Y chromosomes in Rumex is facultative rather than constitutive. Furthermore, the observed response of Y-bodies to 5-azaC may result indirectly from demethylation and the subsequent altered expression of unknown genes controlling tissue-specific Y-inactivation as opposed to the global demethylation of Y-chromosome DNA.     

Neuropeptide Y receptor gene y6: multiple deaths or resurrections?

The neuropeptide Y family of G-protein-coupled receptors consists of five cloned members in mammals. Four genes give rise to functional receptors in all mammals investigated. The y6 gene is a pseudogene in human and pig and is absent in rat, but generates a functional receptor in rabbit and mouse and probably in the collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), a distant relative of the pig family. We report here that the guinea pig y6 gene has a highly distorted nucleotide sequence with multiple frame-shift mutations. One evolutionary scenario may suggest that y6 was inactivated before the divergence of the mammalian orders and subsequently resurrected in some lineages. However, the pseudogene mutations seem to be distinct in human, pig, and guinea pig, arguing for separate inactivation events. In either case, the y6 gene has a quite unusual evolutionary history with multiple independent deaths or resurrections.     

Namesakes or relatives? Approaches to investigating the relationship between Y chromosome haplogroups and surnames

Population genetics successfully applies surnames as quasi-genetic markers when estimating similarity between populations and calculating the level of random inbreeding. These calculations are based on the isonymy coefficient, which assumes that every surname is monophyletic, i.e., it originated from a single common ancestor and all namesakes are therefore relatives. On the other hand, there is a general opinion that a typical Russian surname is polyphyletic: it originated multiple times and most namesakes are, therefore, not related to each other. Combined studies of Y chromosomes and surnames now allow us to address this issue. This study discusses approaches to statistical evaluation of Y chromosome haplogroup frequencies in groups of people bearing the same surname (namesakes). The proposed index of accumulated haplogroup frequency eliminates the artifactual effect of a randomly increased haplogroup frequency in namesakes by subtracting its population (expected) frequency from the observed value, while the expected frequency is calculated as the weighted average of the frequencies of this haplogroup in the populations where the surname carriers come from. From the total sample (comprising 1244 persons from 13 populations of the historical Russian area), 123 individuals carrying 14 most frequent surnames were chosen. A comparison of the haplogroup frequencies in these 14 namesake groups and in 14 respective population control groups compiled from the total sample showed that accumulation of certain Y chromosome haplogroups was nonrandom even in carriers of widespread surnames. An analysis of Y-STR haplotypes rather than Y-SNP haplogroups could provide a better insight into relationships between namesakes and will be the subject of further research.     

Namesakes or relatives? Approaches to investigating the relationship between Y chromosomal haplogroups and surnames

Population genetics successfully applies surnames as quasi-genetic markers when estimating similarity between populations and calculating a measure of random inbreeding. These calculations are based on an isonomy coefficient which assumes that every surname is monophyletic: that it originated from single common ancestor and all namesakes are therefore relatives. On the other hand, there is a general opinion that a typical Russian surname is polyphyletic: it originated multiple times and most namesakes are therefore not related to each other. Combined studies of Y chromosomes and surnames now allow us to address this issue. In this study, we discuss approaches for statistical evaluation of Y chromosomal haplogroup frequencies in groups of people bearing the same surname (namesakes). We propose an 'Index of Accumulated Haplogroup Frequency', which allows for errors due to random (artifactual) effects increasing a haplogroup frequency in a group of namesakes by subtracting the population frequency of this haplogroup. This population frequency is calculated as the weighted average of the frequencies of this haplogroup in the populations that the carriers of this surname come from. Fom the total sample (comprising 1244 persons from 13 populations of the historical Russian area) we chose 123 persons carrying 14 surnames which were the most frequent in the total sample. Haplogroup frequencies in these 14 "surname" groups were compared with the respective 14 "population" control groups compiled from the total sample as described above. We found that even these widespread surnames exhibit non-random accumulation of specific Y chromosomal haplogroups. More detailed analyses of the relationships between namesakes could be carried out using Y-STR haplotypes rather than Y-SNP haplogroups, and will be the subject of a future study.     

神经肽Y

神经肽Y(NPY)是一种新发现的广泛存在于中枢和周围神经系统内的多肽物质。它在许多方面调节或参与肾上腺素能神经的作用。它影响动物的LH 分泌和饮食行为,可能参与锥体外系运动功能的调节。它引起持久的血管平滑肌收缩,可能是造成冠状动脉痉挛的因素之一,并使心肌收缩力减弱。一些与儿茶酚胺有关的肿瘤如嗜铬细胞瘤组织以及这种病人的血液中都含有大量的NPY,它参与某些发病机制,测定它的含量还有诊断意义。     

Y染色质

Ｙ染色质的发现是萤光染色技术发明的结果,Ｙ染色质作为Ｙ染色体长臂的一部分,在人类男性各种间期细胞代表Ｙ染色体。Ｙ染色质观察在临床性别鉴定,Ｙ染色体数量异常诊断和遗传优生方面得到广泛的应用。     

神经肽Y

神经肽Ｙ周明（安徽农业大学畜牧水产学院,合肥２３００３６）关键词神经肽Ｙ１．ＮＰＹ的化学结构Ｔａｔｅｍｏｔｏ（１９８２）首次从猪脑中分离出含量很高的一种多肽,由于它以酪氨酸作为氨基末端与酪氨酰胺作为梭基末端,每分子多肽又含有五个酪氨酸（Ｔｙｒｏｓｉｎ...     

神经肽Y及其受体Y1、Y2对痛觉调制的研究进展

神经肽Y（neuropeptide Y,NPY）是一种由36个氨基酸残基组成的肽类激素,属胰多肽家族,广泛分布于中枢及外周神经组织的神经元中。NPY主要参与摄食行为、心血管活动、垂体分泌等生理功能的调节。NPY还参与了痛觉调制。NPY受体有Y1、Y2、Y3、Y4、Y5和Y6六种亚型。目前对Y1受体和Y2受体的研究较多,显示Y1受体和Y2受体参与痛觉调制。但现在对NPY在痛觉中的具体作用机制还不清楚。该文对NPY及其Y1受体、Y2受体在痛觉调制中的作用作一概述。     

Novel Cell Line Selectively Expressing Neuropeptide Y‐Y2 Receptors

Abstract

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) recognition by the human neuroblastoma cell lines SiMa, Kelly, SH‐SY5Y, CHP‐234, and MHH‐NB‐11 was analyzed in radioactive binding assays using tritiated NPY. For the cell lines CHP‐234 and MHH‐NB‐11 binding of [³H]propionyl‐NPY was observed with K_d‐values of 0.64 ± 0.07 nM and 0.53 ± 0.12 nM, respectively, determined by saturation analysis with non‐linear regression. The receptor subtype was determined by competition analysis using the subtype selective NPY analogues [Leu³¹, Pro³⁴]‐NPY (NPY‐Y₁, NPY‐Y₅), [Ahx^5‐24]‐NPY (NPY‐Y₂), [Ala³¹, Aib³²]‐NPY (NPY‐Y₅), NPY [3‐36] (NPY‐Y₂, NPY‐Y₅), and NPY [13‐36] (NPY‐Y₂). Both cell lines, CHP‐234 and MHH‐NB‐11, the latter one being characterized for NPY receptors for the first time, showed exclusive expression of NPY‐Y₂ receptors. In both cell lines binding of NPY induced signal transduction, which was monitored as reduction of forskolin‐induced cAMP production in an ELISA.     

Y染色体的秘密

长有一身亮丽羽毛的雄性美国红尾鸲正在喂养它们的幼鸟。美国红尾鸲又叫圣诞鸟，每年秋季雄乌在哺育幼鸟的时候几乎达到一种忘我的“溺爱”程度。但是这种奉献对它们而言代价也非同一般。科学家发现，那些最繁忙的父亲们不得不推迟它们迁往南方的时间表，这使得它们很难在越冬地占领到一块好的个人领域。它们甚至不得不在迁徙的途中更换身上的羽毛，这就减少了羽毛中表示性感的红色素，     

男性不育与Y染色体

目的:观察精子数目异常与小Y染色体及内分泌性腺激素水平。方法:对262名少精及无精症患者检测染色体,并对其中11例小Y染色体及随机抽取的15例Y染色体正常的患者运用磁性分离酶免疫测定法分别检测性腺激素。结果:小Y染色体检出率为4.19%(11/262),其内分泌性腺激素均呈高卵泡刺激素、高黄体生成素和低睾酮水平,与Y染色体正常的无精及少精症患者相比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。而小Y染色体不同精子数组各内分泌性腺激素比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:精子数目异常可能与小Y染色体有关,小Y染色体基因改变可能是导致其内分泌性腺激素的变化因素。     

男性不育与Y染色体

目的：观察精子数目异常与小Y染色体及内分泌性腺激素水平。方法：对262名少精及无精症患者检测染色体,并对其中11例小Y染色体及随机抽取的15例Y染色体正常的患者运用磁性分离酶免疫测定法分别检测性腺激素。结果：小Y染色体检出率为4.19％（11／262）,其内分泌性腺激素均呈高卵泡刺激素、高黄体生成素和低睾酮水平,与Y染色体正常的无精及少精症患者相比较．差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。而小Y染色体不同精子数组各内分泌性腺激素比较,差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论：精子数目畀常可能与小Y染色体有关,小Y染色体基因改变可能是导致其内分泌性腺激素的变化因素。     

Receptors for Protons or Lipid Messengers or Both?

The subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors comprising GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, and G2A was originally characterized as a group of proteins mediating biological responses to the lipid messengers sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), and psychosine. We challenged this view by reporting that OGR1 and GPR4 sense acidic pH and that this process is not affected by concentrations of SPC or LPC previously reported as agonistic. The original publications describing GPR4, OGR1, and G2A as receptors for LPC or SPC have now been retracted, and the first studies exploring receptors of this family as pH sensors in physiology have appeared. Here we review the status of this field and we confirm that GPR4, OGR1, and TDAG8 should be considered as proton-sensing receptors. Negative regulation of these receptors by high micromolar concentrations of lipids appears not specific in our experiments.     

Receptors for protons or lipid messengers or both?

The subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors comprising GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, and G2A was originally characterized as a group of proteins mediating biological responses to the lipid messengers sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), and psychosine. We challenged this view by reporting that OGR1 and GPR4 sense acidic pH and that this process is not affected by concentrations of SPC or LPC previously reported as agonistic. The original publications describing GPR4, OGR1, and G2A as receptors for LPC or SPC have now been retracted, and the first studies exploring receptors of this family as pH sensors in physiology have appeared. Here we review the status of this field and we confirm that GPR4, OGR1, and TDAG8 should be considered as proton-sensing receptors. Negative regulation of these receptors by high micromolar concentrations of lipids appears not specific in our experiments.