Translesion DNA synthesis-assisted non-homologous end-joining of complex double-strand breaks prevents loss of DNA sequences in mammalian cells

Double strand breaks (DSB) are severe DNA lesions, and if not properly repaired, may lead to cell death or cancer. While there is considerable data on the repair of simple DSB (sDSB) by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), little is known about the repair of complex DSBs (cDSB), namely breaks with a nearby modification, which precludes ligation without prior processing. To study the mechanism of cDSB repair we developed a plasmid-based shuttle assay for the repair of a defined site-specific cDSB in cultured mammalian cells. Using this assay we found that repair efficiency and accuracy of a cDSB with an abasic site in a 5′ overhang was reduced compared with a sDSB. Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) across the abasic site located at the break prevented loss of DNA sequences, but was highly mutagenic also at the template base next to the abasic site. Similar to sDSB repair, cDSB repair was totally dependent on XrccIV, and altered in the absence of Ku80. In contrast, Artemis appears to be specifically involved in cDSB repair. These results may indicate that mammalian cells have a damage control strategy, whereby severe deletions are prevented at the expense of the less deleterious point mutations during NHEJ.     

CtIP and MRN promote non-homologous end-joining of etoposide-induced DNA double-strand breaks in G1

Topoisomerases class II (topoII) cleave and re-ligate the DNA double helix to allow the passage of an intact DNA strand through it. Chemotherapeutic drugs such as etoposide target topoII, interfere with the normal enzymatic cleavage/re-ligation reaction and create a DNA double-strand break (DSB) with the enzyme covalently bound to the 5'-end of the DNA. Such DSBs are repaired by one of the two major DSB repair pathways, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination. However, prior to repair, the covalently bound topoII needs to be removed from the DNA end, a process requiring the MRX complex and ctp1 in fission yeast. CtIP, the mammalian ortholog of ctp1, is known to promote homologous recombination by resecting DSB ends. Here, we show that human cells arrested in G0/G1 repair etoposide-induced DSBs by NHEJ and, surprisingly, require the MRN complex (the ortholog of MRX) and CtIP. CtIP's function for repairing etoposide-induced DSBs by NHEJ in G0/G1 requires the Thr-847 but not the Ser-327 phosphorylation site, both of which are needed for resection during HR. This finding establishes that CtIP promotes NHEJ of etoposide-induced DSBs during G0/G1 phase with an end-processing function that is distinct to its resection function.     

Metastasis suppressor NME1 promotes non-homologous end joining of DNA double-strand breaks

NME1 (also known as NM23-H1) was the first identified tumor metastasis suppressor, which has been reported to link with genomic stability maintenance and cancer. However its underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here we find that NME1 is required for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Mechanistically, NME1 re-localizes to DNA damage sites in a Ku-XRCC4-dependent manner, and regulates downstream LIG4 recruitment and end joining efficiency. Furthermore, we show that the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of NME1 is critical for its function in NHEJ. Taken together, our findings identify NME1 as a novel NHEJ factor, and reveal how this metastasis suppressor promotes genome stability.     

Remodeling and spacing factor 1 (RSF1) deposits centromere proteins at DNA double-strand breaks to promote non-homologous end-joining

The cellular response to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in native chromatin requires a tight coordination between the activities of DNA repair machineries and factors that modulate chromatin structure. SMARCA5 is an ATPase of the SNF2 family of chromatin remodeling factors that has recently been implicated in the DSB response. It forms distinct chromatin remodeling complexes with several non-canonical subunits, including the remodeling and spacing factor 1 (RSF1) protein. Despite the fact that RSF1 is often overexpressed in tumors and linked to tumorigenesis and genome instability, its role in the DSB response remains largely unclear. Here we show that RSF1 accumulates at DSB sites and protects human cells against IR-induced DSBs by promoting repair of these lesions through homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Although SMARCA5 regulates the RNF168-dependent ubiquitin response that targets BRCA1 to DSBs, we found RSF1 to be dispensable for this process. Conversely, we found that RSF1 facilitates the assembly of centromere proteins CENP-S and CENP-X at sites of DNA damage, while SMARCA5 was not required for these events. Mechanistically, we uncovered that CENP-S and CENP-X, upon their incorporation by RSF1, promote assembly of the NHEJ factor XRCC4 at damaged chromatin. In contrast, CENP-S and CENP-X were dispensable for HR, suggesting that RSF1 regulates HR independently of these centromere proteins. Our findings reveal distinct functions of RSF1 in the 2 major pathways of DSB repair and explain how RSF1, through the loading of centromere proteins and XRCC4 at DSBs, promotes repair by non-homologous end-joining.     

Distinct roles of XRCC4 and Ku80 in non-homologous end-joining of endonuclease- and ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks

Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is mediated by two protein complexes comprising Ku80/Ku70/DNA-PKcs/Artemis and XRCC4/LigaseIV/XLF. Loss of Ku or XRCC4/LigaseIV function compromises the rejoining of radiation-induced DSBs and leads to defective V(D)J recombination. In this study, we sought to define how XRCC4 and Ku80 affect NHEJ of site-directed chromosomal DSBs in murine fibroblasts. We employed a recently developed reporter system based on the rejoining of I-SceI endonuclease-induced DSBs. We found that the frequency of NHEJ was reduced by more than 20-fold in XRCC4−/− compared to XRCC4+/+ cells, while a Ku80 knock-out reduced the rejoining efficiency by only 1.4-fold. In contrast, lack of either XRCC4 or Ku80 increased end degradation and shifted repair towards a mode that used longer terminal microhomologies for rejoining. However, both proteins proved to be essential for the repair of radiation-induced DSBs. The remarkably different phenotype of XRCC4- and Ku80-deficient cells with regard to the repair of enzyme-induced DSBs mirrors the embryonic lethality of XRCC4 knock-out mice as opposed to the viability of the Ku80 knock-out. Thus, I-SceI-induced breaks may resemble DSBs arising during normal DNA metabolism and mouse development. The removal of these breaks likely has different genetic requirements than the repair of radiation-induced DSBs.     

Making ends meet: repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous forms of DNA lesion that can result in genomic instability and cell death. Therefore cells have developed elaborate DSB-repair pathways to maintain the integrity of genomic DNA. There are two major pathways for the repair of DSBs in eukaryotes: homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Until very recently, the NHEJ pathway had been thought to be restricted to the eukarya. However, an evolutionarily related NHEJ apparatus has now been identified and characterized in the prokarya. Here we review the recent discoveries concerning bacterial NHEJ and discuss the possible origins of this repair system. We also examine the insights gained from the recent cellular and biochemical studies of this DSB-repair process and discuss the possible cellular roles of an NHEJ pathway in the life-cycle of prokaryotes and phages.     

Sirtuin inhibition increases the rate of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks

Sirtuins (type III histone deacetylases) are an important member of a group of enzymes that modify chromatin conformation. We investigated the role of sirtuin inhibitor, GPI 19015, in double strand break (DSB) repair in CHO-K1 wt and xrs-6 mutant cells. The latter is defective in DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK)-mediated non-homologous end-joining (D-NHEJ). DSB were estimated by the neutral comet assay and histone gammaH2AX foci formation. We observed a weaker effect of GPI 19015 treatment on the repair kinetics in CHO wt cells than in xrs6. In the latter cells the increase in DNA repair rate was most pronounced in G1 phase and practically absent in S and G2 cell cycle phases. The decrease in the number of histone gammaH2AX foci was faster in xrs6 than in CHO-K1 cells. The altered repair rate did not affect survival of X-irradiated cells. Since in G1 xrs6 cells DNA-PK-dependent non-homologous end-joining, D-NHEJ, does not operate, these results indicate that inhibition of sirtuins modulates DNA-PK-independent (backup) non-homologous end-joining, B-NHEJ, to a greater extent than the other DSB repair system, D-NHEJ.     

Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks

In mammalian cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by three pathways, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), gene conversion (GC) and single-strand annealing (SSA). These pathways are distinct with regard to repair efficiency and mutagenic potential and must be tightly controlled to preserve viability and genomic stability. Here, we employed chromosomal reporter constructs to characterize the hierarchy of NHEJ, GC and SSA at a single I-SceI-induced DSB in Chinese hamster ovary cells. We discovered that the use of GC and SSA was increased by 6- to 8-fold upon loss of Ku80 function, suggesting that NHEJ is dominant over the other two pathways. However, NHEJ efficiency was not altered if GC was impaired by Rad51 knockdown. Interestingly, when SSA was made available as an alternative mode for DSB repair, loss of Rad51 function led to an increase in SSA activity at the expense of NHEJ, implying that Rad51 may indirectly promote NHEJ by limiting SSA. We conclude that a repair hierarchy exists to limit the access of the most mutagenic mechanism, SSA, to the break site. Furthermore, the cellular choice of repair pathways is reversible and can be influenced at the level of effector proteins such as Ku80 or Rad51.     

Characteristics of the end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks by the ataxia-telangiectasia nuclear extract

A double-strand break was introduced in plasmid pZErO-2 at a specific site within the ccdB gene that is lethal to Escherichia coli cells and treated with nuclear extracts from human cells. The efficiency of rejoining was monitored by Southern blot analysis and the fidelity of rejoining was measured by expressing the ccdB gene after bacterial transformation. The efficiency of rejoining in the nuclear extract from an ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) cell line was comparable to that from a control cell line. However, the accuracy of rejoining was much lower for the A-T cell extract than for the control cell extract. All mutations were deletions, most of which contained short direct repeats at the breakpoint junctions. The deletion spectrum caused by the A-T nuclear extract was distinct from that of the control extract. These results indicate that the ccdB gene is useful for analysis of mis-rejoining and that A-T cells have certain deficiencies in end-joining of double-strand breaks in DNA.     

Measurement of prompt DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells without including heat-labile sites: results for cells deficient in nonhomologous end joining

Ionizing radiation induces prompt single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks in DNA. In addition, labile sites are induced that can be converted to breaks by heat or mild alkali. When such labile lesions are present within multiply damaged sites, additional double-strand breaks can form. Current protocols for measurement of DNA double-strand breaks involve a lysis step at an elevated temperature, and consequently breaks from heat-labile sites will be generated during lysis and will be included in the measurement. However, such sites may not develop into breaks within the cell and therefore may not need DNA double-strand break repair processes for elimination. We present here a new lysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol that is carried out entirely at 0-4 degrees C and thus avoids inclusion of heat-labile sites in the measurement. The new recommended lysis procedure involves two steps: The first step includes proteinase K, which has sufficient activity at 0 degrees C to support lysis, and the second step includes a high-salt buffer to further free the DNA from proteins and other cellular structures. Using various tests, we conclude that lysis is sufficient with this procedure to allow accurate determination of double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Using the new protocol, it was found that heat-labile sites account for 30% of the initial number of double-strand breaks measured by conventional protocols after exposure to low-LET radiation. In addition, we show that heat-labile sites that can be converted to double-strand breaks are repaired with fast kinetics and are almost completely eliminated after 1 h at 37 degrees C. A study of cells deficient in nonhomologous end joining reveals that the residual fast repair response typically seen in such cells is solely due to repair at heat-labile sites and is not due to repair of prompt DSBs.     

BRCA1-mediated repression of mutagenic end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks requires complex formation with BACH1

BACH1 (BRCA1-associated C-terminal helicase 1), the product of the BRIP1 {BRCA1 [breast cancer 1, early onset]-interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1; also known as FANCJ [FA-J (Fanconi anaemia group J) protein]} gene mutated in Fanconi anaemia patients from complementation group J, has been implicated in DNA repair and damage signalling. BACH1 exerts DNA helicase activities and physically interacts with BRCA1 and MLH1 (mutL homologue 1), which differentially control DNA DSB (double-strand break) repair processes. The present study shows that BACH1 plays a role in both HR (homologous recombination) and MMEJ (microhomology-mediated non-homologous end-joining) and reveals discrete mechanisms underlying modulation of these pathways. Our results indicate that BACH1 stimulates HR, which depends on the integrity of the helicase domain. Disruption of the BRCA1-BACH1 complex through mutation of BACH1 compromised errorfree NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) and accelerated error-prone MMEJ. Conversely, molecular changes in BACH1 abrogating MLH1 binding interfered neither with HR nor with MMEJ. Importantly, MMEJ is a mutagenic DSB repair pathway, which is derepressed in hereditary breast and ovarian carcinomas. Since BRCA1 and BACH1 mutations targeting the BRCA1-BACH1 interaction have been associated with breast cancer susceptibility, the results of the present study thus provide evidence for a novel role of BACH1 in tumour suppression.     

Repair of DNA damage induced by accelerated heavy ions in mammalian cells proficient and deficient in the non-homologous end-joining pathway

Human and rodent cells proficient and deficient in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) were irradiated with X rays, 70 keV/microm carbon ions, and 200 keV/microm iron ions, and the biological effects on these cells were compared. For wild-type CHO and normal human fibroblast (HFL III) cells, exposure to iron ions yielded the lowest cell survival, followed by carbon ions and then X rays. NHEJ-deficient xrs6 (a Ku80 mutant of CHO) and 180BR human fibroblast (DNA ligase IV mutant) cells showed similar cell survival for X and carbon-ion irradiation (RBE = approximately 1.0). This phenotype is likely to result from a defective NHEJ protein because xrs6-hamKu80 cells (xrs6 cells corrected with the wild-type KU80 gene) exhibited the wild-type response. At doses higher than 1 Gy, NHEJ-defective cells showed a lower level of survival with iron ions than with carbon ions or X rays, possibly due to inactivation of a radioresistant subpopulation. The G(1) premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay with HFL III cells revealed LET-dependent impairment of repair of chromosome breaks. Additionally, iron-ion radiation induced non-repairable chromosome breaks not observed with carbon ions or X rays. PCC studies with 180BR cells indicated that the repair kinetics after exposure to carbon and iron ions behaved similarly for the first 6 h, but after 24 h the curve for carbon ions approached that for X rays, while the curve for iron ions remained high. These chromosome data reflect the existence of a slow NHEJ repair phase and severe biological damage induced by iron ions. The auto-phosphorylation of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunits (DNA-PKcs), an essential NHEJ step, was delayed significantly by high-LET carbon- and iron-ion radiation compared to X rays. This delay was further emphasized in NHEJ-defective 180BR cells. Our results indicate that high-LET radiation induces complex DNA damage that is not easily repaired or is not repaired by NHEJ even at low radiation doses such as 2 Gy.     

Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in mammalian cells. Repair with NHEJ or HR using single-strand annealing (SSA) often results in deletions and is generally referred to as non-conservative recombination. Error-free, conservative HR involves strand invasion and requires a homologous DNA template, and therefore it is generally believed that this type of repair occurs preferentially in the late S, G₂ and M phases of the cell cycle, when the sister chromatid is available. There are several observations supporting this hypothesis, although it has not been tested directly. Here, we synchronize human SW480SN.3 cells in the G₁/G₀ (with serum starvation), S (with thymidine block) and M (with nocodazole) phases of the cell cycle and investigate the efficiency of conservative HR repair of an I-SceI-induced DSB. The frequency of HR repair of DSBs was 39 times higher in S-phase cells than in M-phase cells and 24-fold higher than in G₁/G₀ cells. This low level of conservative HR occurs even though a homologous template is present within the recombination substrate. We propose that this can be explained by an absence of recombination proteins outside the S phase or alternatively that there maybe factors that suppress HR in G₁/G₀ and M. Furthermore, we found that HR repair of DSBs involves short tract gene conversion in all the phases of the cell cycle. This indicates that the same pathway for conservative HR is employed in the repair of DSBs regardless of phase of the cell cycle and that only the frequency is affected.     

Role of the yeast DNA repair protein Nej1 in end processing during the repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB)s often require end processing prior to joining during their repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Although the yeast proteins, Pol4, a Pol X family DNA polymerase, and Rad27, a nuclease, participate in the end processing reactions of NHEJ, the mechanisms underlying the recruitment of these factors to DSBs are not known. Here we demonstrate that Nej1, a NHEJ factor that interacts with and modulates the activity of the NHEJ DNA ligase complex (Dnl4/Lif1), physically and functionally interacts with both Pol4 and Rad27. Notably, Nej1 and Dnl4/Lif1, which also interacts with both Pol4 and Rad27, independently recruit the end processing factors to in vivo DSBs via mechanisms that are additive rather than redundant. As was observed with Dnl4/Lif1, the activities of both Pol4 and Rad27 were enhanced by the interaction with Nej1. Furthermore, Nej1 increased the joining of incompatible DNA ends in reconstituted reactions containing Pol4, Rad27 and Dnl4/Lif1, indicating that the stimulatory activities of Nej1 and Dnl4/Lif1 are also additive. Together our results reveal novel roles for Nej1 in the recruitment of Pol4 and Rad27 to in vivo DSBs and the coordination of the end processing and ligation reactions of NHEJ.     

The changes of DNA double-strand breaks and DNA repair during ovarian reserve formation in mice

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is crucial to maintain genomic stability for sufficient ovarian reserve. It remains unknown the changes of DSBs formation and DNA repair in germ cells during ovarian reserve formation in FVB/N mice. We demonstrated germ cell numbers increased significantly (all P < 0.05) from E11.5 to E13.5 and decreased significantly (all P> 0.05) until P2. OCT4 and SOX2 analyses indicated pluripotency peaks at E13.5 then decreases significantly (all P 0.05) until P2. γH2AX analyses revealed DSB formation significantly (P < 0.05) increased from E13.5 until P2. RAD51 and DMC1 data revealed homologous recombination (HR) pathway repair of DSBs is persistent active during meiosis (E13.5- P2) (all P> 0.05). 53BP1 and KU70 data indicate the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) remains active during meiosis. 53BP1 expression was highest at E13.5 (P < 0.05). KU70 expression was higher in germ cells from E15.5 to P2 (all < P 0.05). PH3 and KI67 analyses revealed germ cell proliferation was not significantly different (all P> 0.05) from E13.5 to P2. Caspase-3 and TUNEL analyses showed germ cells apoptosis was not significantly different (all P > 0.05) from E13.5 to P2. In conclusion, we found both germ cell number and pluripotency peak at E13.5 and decline during meiosis. We demonstrated HR and NHEJ continually repair DSBs during meiosis. RAD51 and DMC1 are continuously expressed during meiosis. 53BP1 is mainly expressed at E13.5. KU70 continually functions from E15.5 to P2. Proliferating and apoptotic cells were rarely detected during meiosis. Results provide a basis for further study of how DSBs and DNA repair affect germ cell development.     

Nuclear organization in DNA end processing: Telomeres vs double-strand breaks

Many proteins ligands are shared between double-strand breaks and natural chromosomal ends or telomeres. The structural similarity of the 3’ overhang, and the efficiency of cellular DNA end degradation machineries, highlight the need for mechanisms that resect selectively to promote or restrict recombination events. Here we examine the means used by eukaryotic cells to suppress resection at telomeres, target telomerase to short telomeres, and process broken ends for appropriate repair. Not only molecular ligands, but the spatial sequestration of telomeres and damage likely ensure that these two very similar structures have very distinct outcomes with respect to the DNA damage response and repair.     

Accumulation of Ku70 at DNA double-strand breaks in living epithelial cells

Ku70 and Ku80 play an essential role in the DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway, i.e., nonhomologous DNA-end-joining (NHEJ). No accumulation mechanisms of Ku70 at DSBs have been clarified in detail, although the accumulation mechanism of Ku70 at DSBs plays key roles in regulating the NHEJ activity. Here, we show the essential domains for the accumulation and function of Ku70 at DSBs in living lung epithelial cells. Our results showed that EGFP-Ku70 accumulation at DSBs began immediately after irradiation. Our findings demonstrate that three domains of Ku70, i.e., the α/β, DNA-binding, and Ku80-binding domains, but not the SAP domain, are necessary for the accumulation at or recognition of DSBs in the early stage after irradiation. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that the leucine at amino acid 385 of Ku70 in the Ku80-binding domain, but not the three target amino acids for acetylation in the DNA-binding domain, is involved in the localization and accumulation of Ku70 at DSBs. Furthermore, accumulations of XRCC4 and XLF, but not that of Artemis, at DSBs are dependent on the presence of Ku70. These findings suggest that Artemis can work in not only the Ku-dependent repair process, but also the Ku-independent process at DSBs in living epithelial cells.     

Caffeine-inhibitable control of the radiation-induced G2 arrest in L5178Y-S cells deficient in non-homologous end-joining

The two L5178Y (LY) sublines bear a heterozygous Tp53 mutation that affects its transactivation function. LY-S (radiation-sensitive) cells are deficient in double strand break (DSB) repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and do not express p21^WAF1 (Cdkna1) either constitutively or after x-irradiation, in contrast to their radiation-resistant counterpart LY-R cells, which express p21^WAF1 constitutively. Radiation-induced G2 arrest in LY-S cells is very long (11 h/Gy) but 2 mM caffeine treatment shortens it, decreases the fraction of G2 cells and increases the fraction of apoptotic cells. The treatment also increases the DNA damage that is estimated with the comet assay 18 h after irradiation with 5 Gy (ca. 23% of the initial value for x-rays and ca. 47% for x-rays plus caffeine). This indicates that either the repair has not been completed or the apoptotic DNA fragmentation has been initiated (or both). The same treatment applied to x-irradiated (5 Gy) LY-R cells (G2 arrest, 4 h/Gy) has no radiosensitising effect, induces no apoptosis and does not alter the amount of DNA damage left unrepaired (ca. 28%). The results are compatible with the assumption that inhibition of the Atm-dependent homologous recombination repair by caffeine, brings differential effects in LY sublines because of the defect of the alternative DNA repair system (NHEJ) in LY-S cells. Received: 23 June 2000 / Accepted: 5 January 2001     

Accumulation of Ku80 proteins at DNA double-strand breaks in living cells

Ku plays a key role in multiple nuclear processes, e.g., DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. The regulation mechanism of the localizations of Ku70 and Ku80 plays a key role in regulating the multiple functions of Ku. Although numerous biochemical studies in vitro have elucidated the DNA binding mechanism of Ku, no accumulation mechanisms of Ku70 and Ku80 at DSBs have been clarified in detail in vivo. In this study, we examined the accumulation mechanism of Ku80 at DSBs in living cells. EGFP-Ku80 accumulation at DSBs began immediately after irradiation. On the other hand, our data show that Ku70 alone, which has DNA binding activity independent of Ku80, cannot accumulate at the DSBs, whereas Ku70 bound to Ku80 can. The deletion of the C-terminal DNA-PKcs-binding domain and the mutation at the SUMOylation site of Ku80 had no effect on Ku80 accumulation. Unexpectedly, N-terminal deletion mutants of Ku80 fully lost their accumulation activity, although the mutants retained their Ku70 binding activity. Altogether, these data demonstrate that Ku80 is essential for Ku70 accumulation at DSBs. Furthermore, three domains of Ku80, i.e., the N-terminal α/β, the DNA-binding, and Ku70-binding domains, seem to necessary for the accumulation at or recognition of DSBs in the early stage after irradiation.