The Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand Binding Pocket and Undergoes Integral Pivoting Movement during the Process of Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II type-1 (AT₁) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. In order to identify those residues in the second transmembrane domain (TMD2) that contribute to the formation of the binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor, we used the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within the Leu-70 to Trp-94 region were mutated one at a time to a cysteine, and, after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of D74C-AT₁, L81C-AT₁, A85C-AT₁, T88C-AT₁, and A89C-AT₁ mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD2 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor background. Indeed, mutant D74C-N111G-AT₁ became insensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant L81C-N111G-AT₁ lost some sensitivity and mutant V86C-N111G-AT₁ became sensitive to MTSEA. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT₁ receptor causes TMD2 to pivot, bringing the top of TMD2 closer to the binding pocket and pushing the bottom of TMD2 away from the binding pocket.The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII)⁵ is the active component of the renin-angiotensin system. It exerts a wide variety of physiological effects, including vascular contraction, aldosterone secretion, neuronal activation, and cardiovascular cell growth and proliferation (1). Virtually all of the known physiological effects of AngII are produced through the activation of the AT₁ receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily (2, 3). GPCRs possess seven transmembrane domains (TMD), which provide structural support for signal transduction. The AT₁ receptor interacts with the G protein G_q/11, which activates a phospholipase C, which in turn generates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol from the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (4, 5). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate causes the release of Ca²⁺ from an intracellular store, whereas diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C.Like other GPCRs, the AT₁ receptor undergoes spontaneous isomerization between its inactive state (favored in the absence of agonist) and its active state (induced or stabilized by the agonist) (6). Movement of TMD helices through translational or rotational displacement is believed to be essential to achieve the active state (7, 8). It has been proposed that TMD3, TMD5, TMD6, and TMD7 may participate in the activation process of the AT₁ receptor by providing a network of interactions through the AngII-binding pocket (9). The dynamics of this network are thought to be modified following agonist binding, thereby forcing the receptor to form new interactions between the TMDs.Based on homology with the high resolution structure of rhodopsin, the archetypal GPCR (10), it was expected that the binding site of the AT₁ receptor would involve the seven mostly hydrophobic TMDs and would be accessible to charged water-soluble ligands, like AngII. For this receptor, the binding site would thus be contained within a water-accessible crevice, the binding pocket, extending from the extracellular surface of the receptor to the transmembrane portion. Using a photoaffinity labeling approach, we directly identified ligand-contact points within the second extracellular loop and the seventh TMD of the AT₁ receptor (11–13). Interestingly, numerous mutagenesis studies have provided the basis for a model in which an interaction between Asn-111 in TMD3 and Tyr-292 in TMD7 maintains the AT₁ receptor in the inactive conformation. The agonist AngII would disrupt this interaction and promote the active conformational state (14). In support of this model, it was further shown that substitution of Asn-111 for a residue of smaller size (Ala or Gly) confers constitutive activity on the AT₁ receptor (15–17).The substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) (18–20) is an ingenious approach for systematically identifying the residues in a TMD that contribute to the binding site pocket of a GPCR. Consecutive residues within TMDs are mutated to cysteine, one at a time, and the mutant receptors are expressed in heterologous cells. If ligand binding to a cysteine-substituted mutant is unchanged compared with wild-type receptor, it is assumed that the structure of the mutant receptor, especially around the binding site, is similar to that of wild type and therefore that the substituted cysteine lies in an orientation similar to that of the wild-type residue. In TMDs, the sulfhydryl of a cysteine oriented toward the binding site pocket should react faster with a positively charged sulfhydryl reagent like methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) than sulfhydryls facing the interior of the protein or the lipid bilayer. Two criteria are used for identifying engineered cysteines on the surface of the binding site pocket: (i) the reaction with MTSEA alters binding irreversibly, and (ii) the reaction is retarded by the presence of ligand. We previously used this approach to identify the residues in TMD3, TMD6, and TMD7 that form the surface of the binding site pocket in the wild-type AT₁ receptor and in the constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor (21–23). Here we report the application of SCAM to probe TMD2 in the wild-type and constitutively active receptors.     

Analysis of Transmembrane Domains 1 and 4 of the Human Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor by Cysteine-scanning Mutagenesis

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the AT₁ receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. Here, we investigated the role of the first and fourth transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the formation of the binding pocket of the human AT₁ receptor using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Each residue within the Phe-28^(1.32)–Ile-53^(1.57) fragment of TMD1 and Leu-143^(4.40)–Phe-170^(4.67) fragment of TMD4 was mutated, one at a time, to a cysteine. The resulting mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells, which were subsequently treated with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA). This treatment led to a significant reduction in the binding affinity of TMD1 mutants M30C^(1.34)-AT₁ and T33C^(1.37)-AT₁ and TMD4 mutant V169C^(4.66)-AT₁. Although this reduction in binding of the TMD1 mutants was maintained when examined in a constitutively active receptor (N111G-AT₁) background, we found that V169C^(4.66)-AT₁ remained unaffected when treated with MTSEA compared with untreated in this context. Moreover, the complete loss of binding observed for R167C^(4.64)-AT₁ was restored upon treatment with MTSEA. Our results suggest that the extracellular portion of TMD1, particularly residues Met-30^(1.34) and Thr-33^(1.37), as well as residues Arg-167^(4.64) and Val-169^(4.66) at the junction of TMD4 and the second extracellular loop, are important binding determinants within the AT₁ receptor binding pocket but that these TMDs undergo very little movement, if at all, during the activation process.     

Analysis of the third transmembrane domain of the human type 1 angiotensin II receptor by cysteine scanning mutagenesis

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TMD) following agonist binding. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which is a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TMD helices. Using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method, we identified the residues within the third TMD of the wild-type angiotensin II (AT1) receptor that contribute to the formation of the binding site pocket. Each residue within the Ile103-Tyr127 region was mutated one at a time to a cysteine. Treating the A104C, N111C, and L112C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) strongly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD3 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, two additional mutants (S109C and V116C) were found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes a minor counterclockwise rotation of TMD3, thereby exposing residues, which are not present in the inactive state, to the binding pocket. This pattern of accessibility of residues in the TMD3 of the AT1 receptor parallels that of homologous residues in rhodopsin. This study identified key elements of TMD3 that contribute to the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors through structural rearrangements.     

Constitutive activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the spatial proximity of transmembrane 7 to the ligand-binding pocket

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TM) following binding of agonist. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which constitutes a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TM helices. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we initially identified those residues within the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) of wild type angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor that contribute to forming the binding site pocket. We have substituted successively TM7 residues ranging from Ile276 to Tyr302 to cysteine. Treatment of A277C, V280C, T282C, A283C, I286C, A291C, and F301C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent MTSEA significantly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was greatly reduced for TM7 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active mutant of the AT1 receptor. Our data suggest that upon activation, TM7 of the AT1 receptor goes through a pattern of helical movements that results in its distancing from the binding pocket per se. These studies support accumulating evidence whereby elements of TM7 of class A GPCRs promote activation of the receptor through structural rearrangements.     

The Active and the Inactive Form of the hAT1 Receptor Have an Identical Ligand-Binding Environment: An MPA Study on a Constitutively Active Angiotensin II Receptor Mutant

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁)¹ receptor mutant N111G-hAT₁ which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT₁ receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT₁ series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.     

Identification of Distinct Conformations of the Angiotensin-II Type 1 Receptor Associated with the Gq/11 Protein Pathway and the β-Arrestin Pathway Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Biased signaling represents the ability of G protein-coupled receptors to engage distinct pathways with various efficacies depending on the ligand used or on mutations in the receptor. The angiotensin-II type 1 (AT₁) receptor, a prototypical class A G protein-coupled receptor, can activate various effectors upon stimulation with the endogenous ligand angiotensin-II (AngII), including the G_q/11 protein and β-arrestins. It is believed that the activation of those two pathways can be associated with distinct conformations of the AT₁ receptor. To verify this hypothesis, microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations were computed to explore the conformational landscape sampled by the WT-AT₁ receptor, the N111G-AT₁ receptor (constitutively active and biased for the G_q/11 pathway), and the D74N-AT₁ receptor (biased for the β-arrestin1 and -2 pathways) in their apo-forms and in complex with AngII. The molecular dynamics simulations of the AngII-WT-AT₁, N111G-AT₁, and AngII-N111G-AT₁ receptors revealed specific structural rearrangements compared with the initial and ground state of the receptor. Simulations of the D74N-AT₁ receptor revealed that the mutation stabilizes the receptor in the initial ground state. The presence of AngII further stabilized the ground state of the D74N-AT₁ receptor. The biased agonist [Sar¹,Ile⁸]AngII also showed a preference for the ground state of the WT-AT₁ receptor compared with AngII. These results suggest that activation of the G_q/11 pathway is associated with a specific conformational transition stabilized by the agonist, whereas the activation of the β-arrestin pathway is linked to the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor.     

Long Range Effect of Mutations on Specific Conformational Changes in the Extracellular Loop 2 of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

The topology of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) and its interaction with ligands is unique in each G protein-coupled receptor. When the orthosteric ligand pocket located in the transmembrane (TM) domain is occupied, ligand-specific conformational changes occur in the ECL2. In more than 90% of G protein-coupled receptors, ECL2 is tethered to the third TM helix via a disulfide bond. Therefore, understanding the extent to which the TM domain and ECL2 conformations are coupled is useful. To investigate this, we examined conformational changes in ECL2 of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) by introducing mutations in distant sites that alter the activation state equilibrium of the AT1R. Differential accessibility of reporter cysteines introduced at four conformation-sensitive sites in ECL2 of these mutants was measured. Binding of the agonist angiotensin II (AngII) and inverse agonist losartan in wild-type AT1R changed the accessibility of reporter cysteines, and the pattern was consistent with ligand-specific “lid” conformations of ECL2. Without agonist stimulation, the ECL2 in the gain of function mutant N111G assumed a lid conformation similar to AngII-bound wild-type AT1R. In the presence of inverse agonists, the conformation of ECL2 in the N111G mutant was similar to the inactive state of wild-type AT1R. In contrast, AngII did not induce a lid conformation in ECL2 in the loss of function D281A mutant, which is consistent with the reduced AngII binding affinity in this mutant. However, a lid conformation was induced by [Sar¹,Gln²,Ile⁸] AngII, a specific analog that binds to the D281A mutant with better affinity than AngII. These results provide evidence for the emerging paradigm of domain coupling facilitated by long range interactions at distant sites on the same receptor.     

The Arrestin-selective Angiotensin AT1 Receptor Agonist [Sar1,Ile4,Ile8]-AngII Negatively Regulates Bradykinin B2 Receptor Signaling via AT1-B2 Receptor Heterodimers

The renin-angiotensin and kallikrein-kinin systems are key regulators of vascular tone and inflammation. Angiotensin II, the principal effector of the renin-angiotensin system, promotes vasoconstriction by activating angiotensin AT₁ receptors. The opposing effects of the kallikrein-kinin system are mediated by bradykinin acting on B₁ and B₂ bradykinin receptors. The renin-angiotensin and kallikrein-kinin systems engage in cross-talk at multiple levels, including the formation of AT₁-B₂ receptor heterodimers. In primary vascular smooth muscle cells, we find that the arrestin pathway-selective AT₁ agonist, [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸]-AngII, but not the neutral AT₁ antagonist, losartan, inhibits endogenous B₂ receptor signaling. In a transfected HEK293 cell model that recapitulates this effect, we find that the actions of [Sar¹,Ile⁴, Ile⁸]-AngII require the AT₁ receptor and result from arrestin-dependent co-internalization of AT₁-B₂ heterodimers. BRET₅₀ measurements indicate that AT₁ and B₂ receptors efficiently heterodimerize. In cells expressing both receptors, pretreatment with [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸]-AngII blunts B₂ receptor activation of G_q/11-dependent intracellular calcium influx and G_i/o-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸]-AngII has no effect on B₂ receptor ligand affinity or bradykinin-induced arrestin3 recruitment. Both radioligand binding assays and quantitative microscopy-based analysis demonstrate that [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸]-AngII promotes internalization of AT₁-B₂ heterodimers. Thus, [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸]-AngII exerts lateral allosteric modulation of B₂ receptor signaling by binding to the orthosteric ligand binding site of the AT₁ receptor and promoting co-sequestration of AT₁-B₂ heterodimers. Given the opposing roles of the renin-angiotensin and kallikrein-kinin systems in vivo, the distinct properties of arrestin pathway-selective and neutral AT₁ receptor ligands may translate into different pharmacologic actions.     

Reassessment of the Unique Mode of Binding between Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Their Blockers

While the molecular structures of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT₁) receptor blockers (ARBs) are very similar, they are also slightly different. Although each ARB has been shown to exhibit a unique mode of binding to AT₁ receptor, different positions of the AT₁ receptor have been analyzed and computational modeling has been performed using different crystal structures for the receptor as a template and different kinds of software. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the critical positions of the AT₁ receptor, Tyr¹¹³, Tyr¹⁸⁴, Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ using a mutagenesis study, and subsequently performed computational modeling of the binding of ARBs to AT₁ receptor using CXCR4 receptor as a new template and a single version of software. The interactions between Tyr¹¹³ in the AT₁ receptor and the hydroxyl group of olmesartan, between Lys¹⁹⁹ and carboxyl or tetrazole groups, and between His²⁵⁶ or Gln²⁵⁷ and the tetrazole group were studied. The common structure, a tetrazole group, of most ARBs similarly bind to Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ of AT₁ receptor. Lys¹⁹⁹ in the AT₁ receptor binds to the carboxyl group of EXP3174, candesartan and azilsartan, whereas oxygen in the amidecarbonyl group of valsartan may bind to Lys¹⁹⁹. The benzimidazole portion of telmisartan may bind to a lipophilic pocket that includes Tyr¹¹³. On the other hand, the n-butyl group of irbesartan may bind to Tyr¹¹³. In conclusion, we confirmed that the slightly different structures of ARBs may be critical for binding to AT₁ receptor and for the formation of unique modes of binding.     

Comparison of the Binding and Functional Actions of Angiotensin Agonists in Clone 9 Cells: Additional Evidence for Angiotensin II Receptor Heterogeneity

Abstract

The effects of the angiotensin-II (All) agonists and antagonists on both ¹²⁵I-SARILE binding and phosphoinositol (PI) accumulation in clone 9 cells were examined. Clone 9 cells, which are derived from rat liver, have been shown to respond to All agonists with an increase in PI accumulation which is inhibitable by Sar₁, Ile₈-AII (SARILE) and DUP-753 but not PD-123319, suggesting that they possess the AT₁ subtype of All receptor. The present results confirmed these properties. The order of potency of AII agonists was AII> AIII> AI. Clone 9 cells also possessed binding sites for ¹²⁵I-SARILE. The majority of these were AT₁ type receptors, although a small number of AT₂ receptors may also have been present. The order of potency of All agonists in inhibiting ¹²⁵-SARILE binding was All » AIII> = AI. The difference in rank order of potency between the functional and binding assays was due to AIII being much less potent in the binding assay than the functional assay. Since the potency of AIII relative to AII was lower than that at either AT₁ or AT₂ subtypes of AII receptor, these data suggest that an additional subtype, with selectively low affinity for AIII, exists.     

Age-Related Changes in Ang II Receptor Localization and Expression in the Developing Auditory Pathway

We studied Ang II receptor localization in different nuclei of the auditory system, by means of binding autoradiography, during brain development. The inferior colliculus (IC), a large midbrain structure which serves as an obligatory synaptic station in both the ascending and descending auditory pathways, exhibited high Ang II AT₂ binding at all ages (P0, P8, P15, P30), being maximal at P15. These observations were confirmed by in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence at P15, demonstrating that AT₂ receptor mRNA localized at the same area recognized by AT₂ antibodies and anti β III–tubulin suggesting the neuronal nature of the reactive cells. Ang II AT₁ receptors were absent at early developmental ages (P0) in all nuclei of the auditory system and a low level was observed in the IC at the age P8. AT₂ receptors were present at ventral cochlear nucleus and superior olivary complex, being higher at P15 and P8, respectively. We also explored the effect of prenatal administration of Ang II or PD123319 (AT₂ antagonist) on binding of Ang II receptors at P0, P8, P15. Both treatments increased significantly the level of AT₂ receptors at P0 and P8 in the IC. Although total binding in the whole IC from P15 animals showed no difference between treatments, the central nucleus of the IC exhibited higher binding. Our results supports a correlation between the timing of the higher expression of Ang II AT₂ receptors in different nuclei, the onset of audition and the establishment of neuronal circuits of the auditory pathway.

     

Six Commercially Available Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Antibodies are Non-specific

Commercially available Angiotensin II AT₁ receptor antibodies are widely employed for receptor localization and quantification, but they have not been adequately validated. In this study, six commercially available AT₁ receptor antibodies were characterized by established criteria: sc-1173 and sc-579 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., AAR-011 from Alomone Labs, Ltd., AB15552 from Millipore, and ab18801 and ab9391 from Abcam. The immunostaining patterns observed were different for every antibody tested, and were unrelated to the presence or absence of AT₁ receptors. The antibodies detected a 43?kDa band in western blots, corresponding to the predicted size of the native AT₁ receptor. However, identical bands were observed in wild-type mice and in AT_1A knock-out mice not expressing the target protein. Moreover, immunoreactivity detected in rat hypothalamic 4B cells not expressing AT₁ receptors or transfected with AT_1A receptor construct was identical, as revealed by western blotting and immunocytochemistry in cultured 4B cells. Additional prominent immunoreactive bands above and below 43?kDa were observed by western blotting in extracts from tissues of AT_1A knock-out and wild-type mice and in 4B cells with or without AT₁ receptor expression. In all cases, the patterns of immunoreactivity were independent of the AT₁ receptor expression and different for each antibody studied. We conclude that, in our experimental setup, none of the commercially available AT₁ receptor antibodies tested met the criteria for specificity and that competitive radioligand binding remains the only reliable approach to study AT₁ receptor physiology in the absence of full antibody characterization.     

A conformationally sensitive residue on the cytoplasmic surface of serotonin transporter

Serotonin transporter (SERT) contains a single reactive external cysteine residue at position 109 (Chen, J. G., Liu-Chen, S., and Rudnick, G. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 1479-1486) and seven predicted cytoplasmic cysteines. A mutant of rat SERT (X8C) in which those eight cysteine residues were replaced by other amino acids retained approximately 32% of wild type transport activity and approximately 56% of wild type binding activity. In contrast to wild-type SERT or the C109A mutant, X8C was resistant to inhibition of high affinity cocaine analog binding by the cysteine reagent 2-(aminoethyl)methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide (MTSEA) in membrane preparations from transfected cells. Each predicted cytoplasmic cysteine residue was reintroduced, one at a time, into the X8C template. Reintroduction of Cys-357, located in the third intracellular loop, restored MTSEA sensitivity similar to that of C109A. Replacement of only Cys-109 and Cys-357 was sufficient to prevent MTSEA sensitivity. Thus, Cys-357 was the sole cytoplasmic determinant of MTSEA sensitivity in SERT. Both serotonin and cocaine protected SERT from inactivation by MTSEA at Cys-357. This protection was apparently mediated through a conformational change following ligand binding. Although both ligands bind in the absence of Na(+) and at 4 degrees C, their ability to protect Cys-357 required Na(+) and was prevented at 4 degrees C. The accessibility of Cys-357 to MTSEA inactivation was increased by monovalent cations. The K(+) ion, which is believed to serve as a countertransport substrate for SERT, was the most effective ion for increasing Cys-357 reactivity.     

Intracerebroventricular Administration of AT1 Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides Inhibits the Behavioral Actions of Angiotensin II

Abstract: Antisense Oligonucleotides were developed to study the expression and function of angiotensin type 1 (AT₁) receptors in cultured cells and brain. In both liver epithelial WB and neuro-blastoma N1E-115 cells AT₁ antisense oligomers substantially decreased AT₁ receptor density, whereas angiotensin type 2 (AT₂) receptors remained unchanged. Similarly, repeated intracerebroventricular injections of AT₁ antisense oligomers in rats decreased AT₁ receptor density in hypothalamic-thalamic-septal tissue, and AT₂ receptors were unaffected. Intracerebroventricular antisense oligomers also attenuated drinking elicited by intra-cerebroventricular angiotensin II but not the cholinomimetic carbachol. Collectively, these results demonstrate that antisense Oligonucleotides attenuate angiotensin receptor expression and function in behaving animals.     

Requirement of membrane-proximal amino acids in the carboxyl-terminal tail for expression of the rat AT1a angiotensin receptor

A series of deletion mutants was created to analyze the function of the membrane-proximal region of the cytoplasmic tail of the rat type 1a (AT_1a) angiotensin receptor. In transiently transfected COS-7 cells, the truncated mutant receptors showed a progressive decrease in surface expression, with no major change in binding affinity for the peptide antagonist, [Sar¹,Ile⁸]angiotensin II. In parallel with the decrease in receptor expression, a progressive decrease in angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate responses was observed. Alanine substitutions in the region 307–311 identified the highly conserved phenylalanine³⁰⁹ and adjacent lysine residues as significant determinants of AT_1a receptor expression.     

Functional Interaction between Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1 and Chemokine (C-C Motif) Receptor 2 with Implications for Chronic Kidney Disease

Understanding functional interactions between G protein-coupled receptors is of great physiological and pathophysiological importance. Heteromerization provides one important potential mechanism for such interaction between different signalling pathways via macromolecular complex formation. Previous studies suggested a functional interplay between angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT₁) and Chemokine (C-C motif) Receptor 2 (CCR2). However the molecular mechanisms are not understood. We investigated AT₁-CCR2 functional interaction in vitro using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer in HEK293 cells and in vivo using subtotal-nephrectomized rats as a well-established model for chronic kidney disease. Our data revealed functional heteromers of these receptors resulting in CCR2-Gαi1 coupling being sensitive to AT₁ activation, as well as apparent enhanced β-arrestin2 recruitment with agonist co-stimulation that is synergistically reversed by combined antagonist treatment. Moreover, we present in vivo findings where combined treatment with AT₁- and CCR2-selective inhibitors was synergistically beneficial in terms of decreasing proteinuria, reducing podocyte loss and preventing renal injury independent of blood pressure in the subtotal-nephrectomized rat model. Our findings further support a role for G protein-coupled receptor functional heteromerization in pathophysiology and provide insights into previous observations indicating the importance of AT₁-CCR2 functional interaction in inflammation, renal and hypertensive disorders.     

Delimiting the Binding Site for Quaternary Ammonium Lidocaine Derivatives in the Acetylcholine Receptor Channel

The triethylammonium QX-314 and the trimethylammonium QX-222 are lidocaine derivatives that act as open-channel blockers of the acetylcholine (ACh) receptor. When bound, these blockers should occlude some of the residues lining the channel. Eight residues in the second membrane-spanning segment (M2) of the mouse-muscle α subunit were mutated one at a time to cysteine and expressed together with wild-type β, γ, and δ subunits in Xenopus oocytes. The rate constant for the reaction of each substituted cysteine with 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA) was determined from the time course of the irreversible effect of MTSEA on the ACh-induced current. The reactions were carried out in the presence and absence of ACh and in the presence and absence of QX-314 and QX-222. These blockers had no effect on the reactions in the absence of ACh. In the presence of ACh, both blockers retarded the reaction of extracellularly applied MTSEA with cysteine substituted for residues from αVal255, one third of the distance in from the extracellular end of M2, to αGlu241, flanking the intracellular end of M2, but not with cysteine substituted for αLeu258 or αGlu262, at the extracellular end of M2. The reactions of MTSEA with cysteines substituted for αLeu258 and αGlu262 were considerably faster in the presence of ACh than in its absence. That QX-314 and QX-222 did not protect αL258C and αE262C against reaction with MTSEA in the presence of ACh implies that protection of the other residues was due to occlusion of the channel and not to the promotion of a less reactive state from a remote site. Given the 12-Å overall length of the blockers and the α-helical conformation of M2 in the open state, the binding site for both blockers extends from αVal255 down to αSer248.     

The active and the inactive form of the hAT1 receptor have an identical ligand-binding environment: an MPA study on a constitutively active angiotensin II receptor mutant

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)1 receptor mutant N111G-hAT1 which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT1 receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT1 series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.