Crystal structure of the phosphoenolpyruvate-binding enzyme I-domain from the Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS)

Enzyme I (EI), the first component of the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), consists of an N-terminal protein-binding domain (EIN) and a C-terminal PEP-binding domain (EIC). EI transfers phosphate from PEP by double displacement via a histidine residue on EIN to the general phosphoryl carrier protein HPr. Here, we report the 1.82A crystal structure of the homodimeric EIC domain from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, a saccharolytic eubacterium that grows optimally at 75 degrees C. EIC folds into a (betaalpha)(8) barrel with three large helical insertions between beta2/alpha2, beta3/alpha3 and beta6/alpha6. The large amphipathic dimer interface buries 3750A(2) of accessible surface area per monomer. A comparison with pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK) reveals that the active-site residues in the empty PEP-binding site of EIC and in the liganded PEP-binding site of PPDK have almost identical conformations, pointing to a rigid structure of the active site. In silico models of EIC in complex with the Z and E-isomers of chloro-PEP provide a rational explanation for their difference as substrates and inhibitors of EI. The EIC domain exhibits 54% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli and 60% with Bacillus subtilis EIC, has the same amino acid composition but contains additional salt-bridges and a more complex salt-bridge network than the homology model of E.coli EIC. The easy crystallization of EIC suggests that T.tengcongensis can serve as source for stable homologs of mesophilic proteins that are too labile for crystallization.     

Phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system from the hyperthermophilic Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis

Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis is a thermophilic eubacterium that has a phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) of 22 proteins. The general PTS proteins, enzyme I and HPr, and the transporters for N-acetylglucosamine (EIICB(GlcNAc)) and fructose (EIIBC(Fru)) have thermal unfolding transitions at ～90 °C and a temperature optimum for in vitro sugar phosphotransferase activity of 65 °C. The phosphocysteine of a EIICB(GlcNAc) mutant is unusually stable at room temperature with a t(1/2) of 60 h. The PEP binding C-terminal domain of enzyme I (EIC) forms a metastable covalent adduct with PEP at 65 °C. Crystallization of this adduct afforded the 1.68 ? resolution structure of EIC with a molecule of pyruvate in the active site. We also report the 1.83 ? crystal structure of the EIC-PEP complex. The comparison of the two structures with the apo form and with full-length EI shows differences between the active site side chain conformations of the PEP and pyruvate states but not between the pyruvate and apo states. In the presence of PEP, Arg465 forms a salt bridge with the phosphate moiety while Glu504 forms salt bridges with Arg186 and Arg195 of the N-terminal domain of enzyme I (EIN), which stabilizes a conformation appropriate for the in-line transfer of the phosphoryl moiety from PEP to His191. After transfer, Arg465 swings 4.8 ? away to form an alternative salt bridge with the carboxylate of Glu504. Glu504 loses the grip of Arg186 and Arg195, and the EIN domain can swing away to hand on the phosphoryl group to the phosphoryl carrier protein HPr.     

Calorimetric and spectroscopic investigation of the interaction between the C‐terminal domain of Enzyme I and its ligands

Enzyme I initiates a series of phosphotransfer reactions during sugar uptake in the bacterial phosphotransferase system. Here, we have isolated a stable recombinant C-terminal domain of Enzyme I (EIC) of Escherichia coli and characterized its interaction with the N-terminal domain of Enzyme I (EIN) and also with various ligands. EIC can phosphorylate EIN, but their binding is transient regardless of the presence of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP). Circular dichroism and NMR indicate that ligand binding to EIC induces changes near aromatic groups but not in the secondary structure of EIC. Binding of PEP to EIC is an endothermic reaction with the equilibrium dissociation constant (K_D) of 0.28 mM, whereas binding of the inhibitor oxalate is an exothermic reaction with K_D of 0.66 mM from calorimetry. The binding thermodynamics of EIC and PEP compared to that of Enzyme I (EI) and PEP reveals that domain–domain motion in EI can contribute as large as ∼−3.2 kcal/mol toward PEP binding.     

Crystal Structure of Enzyme I of the Phosphoenolpyruvate Sugar Phosphotransferase System in the Dephosphorylated State

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) sugar phosphotransferase system mediates sugar uptake and controls the carbon metabolism in response to carbohydrate availability. Enzyme I (EI), the first component of the phosphotransferase system, consists of an N-terminal protein binding domain (EIN) and a C-terminal PEP binding domain (EIC). EI transfers phosphate from PEP by double displacement via a histidine residue on EIN to the general phosphoryl carrier protein HPr. Here we report the 2.4 Å crystal structure of the homodimeric EI from Staphylococcus aureus. EIN consists of the helical hairpin HPr binding subdomain and the phosphorylatable βα phospho-histidine (P-His) domain. EIC folds into an (βα)₈ barrel. The dimer interface of EIC buries 1833 Ų of accessible surface per monomer and contains two Ca²⁺ binding sites per dimer. The structures of the S. aureus and Escherichia coli EI domains (Teplyakov, A., Lim, K., Zhu, P. P., Kapadia, G., Chen, C. C., Schwartz, J., Howard, A., Reddy, P. T., Peterkofsky, A., and Herzberg, O. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 16218–16223) are very similar. The orientation of the domains relative to each other, however, is different. In the present structure the P-His domain is docked to the HPr binding domain in an orientation appropriate for in-line transfer of the phosphate to the active site histidine of the acceptor HPr. In the E. coli structure the phospho-His of the P-His domain projects into the PEP binding site of EIC. In the S. aureus structure the crystallographic temperature factors are lower for the HPr binding domain in contact with the P-His domain and higher for EIC. In the E. coli structure it is the reverse.     

<Superscript>1</Superscript>H, <Superscript>15</Superscript>N, <Superscript>13</Superscript>C backbone resonance assignment of the C-terminal domain of enzyme I from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis</Emphasis>

Phosphoenolpyruvate binding to the C-terminal domain (EIC) of enzyme I of the bacterial phosphotransferase system (PTS) initiates a phosphorylation cascade that results in sugar translocation across the cell membrane and controls a large number of essential pathways in bacterial metabolism. EIC undergoes an expanded to compact conformational equilibrium that is regulated by ligand binding and determines the phosphorylation state of the overall PTS. Here, we report the backbone ¹H, ¹⁵N and ¹³C chemical shift assignments of the 70 kDa EIC dimer from the thermophilic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis. Assignments were obtained at 70 °C by heteronuclear multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. In total, 90% of all backbone resonances were assigned, with 264 out of a possible 299 residues assigned in the ¹H–¹⁵N TROSY spectrum. The secondary structure predicted from the assigned backbone resonance using the program TALOS+ is in good agreement with the X-ray crystal structure of T. tengcongensis EIC. The reported assignments will allow detailed structural and thermodynamic investigations on the coupling between ligand binding and conformational dynamics in EIC.     

Properties of the C-terminal domain of enzyme I of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):glycose phosphotransferase system (PTS) mediates uptake/phosphorylation of sugars. The transport of all PTS sugars requires Enzyme I (EI) and a phosphocarrier histidine protein of the PTS (HPr). The PTS is stringently regulated, and a potential mechanism is the monomer/dimer transition of EI, because only the dimer accepts the phosphoryl group from PEP. EI monomer consists of two major domains, at the N and C termini (EI-N and EI-C, respectively). EI-N accepts the phosphoryl group from phospho-HPr but not PEP. However, it is phosphorylated by PEP(Mg(2+)) when complemented with EI-C. Here we report that the phosphotransfer rate increases approximately 25-fold when HPr is added to a mixture of EI-N, EI-C, and PEP(Mg(2+)). A model to explain this effect is offered. Sedimentation equilibrium results show that the association constant for dimerization of EI-C monomers is 260-fold greater than the K(a) for native EI. The ligands have no detectable effect on the secondary structure of the dimer (far UV CD) but have profound effects on the tertiary structure as determined by near UV CD spectroscopy, thermal denaturation, sedimentation equilibrium and velocity, and intrinsic fluorescence of the 2 Trp residues. The binding of PEP requires Mg(2+). For example, there is no effect of PEP on the T(m), an increase of 7 degrees C in the presence of Mg(2+), and approximately 14 degrees C when both are present. Interestingly, the dissociation constants for each of the ligands from EI-C are approximately the same as the kinetic (K(m)) constants for the ligands in the complete PTS sugar phosphorylation assays.     

Enzyme I of the phosphotransferase system: induced-fit protonation of the reaction transition state by Cys-502

Enzyme I (EI), the first component of the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), consists of an N-terminal domain with the phosphorylation site (His-189) and a C-terminal domain with the PEP binding site. Here we use C3-substituted PEP analogues as substrates and inhibitors and the EI(C502A) mutant to characterize structure-activity relationships of the PEP binding site. EI(C502A) is 10 000 times less active than wild-type EI [EI(wt)] with PEP as the substrate, whereas the two forms are equally active with ZClPEP. Cys-502 acts as an acid-base catalyst which stereospecifically protonates the pyruvoyl enolate at C3. The electron-withdrawing chlorine of ZClPEP can compensate for the lack of Cys-502, and in this case, the released 3-Cl-enolate is protonated nonstereospecifically. Several PEP analogues were assayed as inhibitors and as substrates. The respective K(I)/K(m) ratios vary between 3 and 40 for EI(wt), but they are constant and around unity for EI(C502A). EI(wt) with PEP as the substrate is inhibited by oxalate, whereas EI(C502A) with ZClPEP is not. The different behavior of EI(wt) and EI(C502A) toward the PEP analogues and oxalate suggests that the PEP binding site of EI(wt) exists in a "closed" and an "open" form. The open to closed transition is triggered by the interaction of the substrate with Cys-502. The closed conformation is sterically disfavored by C3-modified substrate analogues such as ZClPEP and ZMePEP. If site closure does not occur as with EI(C502A) and bulky substrates, the transition state is stabilized by electron dispersion to the electron-withdrawing substituent at C3.     

How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria.

The phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) is found only in bacteria, where it catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of numerous monosaccharides, disaccharides, amino sugars, polyols, and other sugar derivatives. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport and phosphorylation, the PTS uses PEP as an energy source and phosphoryl donor. The phosphoryl group of PEP is usually transferred via four distinct proteins (domains) to the transported sugar bound to the respective membrane component(s) (EIIC and EIID) of the PTS. The organization of the PTS as a four-step phosphoryl transfer system, in which all P derivatives exhibit similar energy (phosphorylation occurs at histidyl or cysteyl residues), is surprising, as a single protein (or domain) coupling energy transfer and sugar phosphorylation would be sufficient for PTS function. A possible explanation for the complexity of the PTS was provided by the discovery that the PTS also carries out numerous regulatory functions. Depending on their phosphorylation state, the four proteins (domains) forming the PTS phosphorylation cascade (EI, HPr, EIIA, and EIIB) can phosphorylate or interact with numerous non-PTS proteins and thereby regulate their activity. In addition, in certain bacteria, one of the PTS components (HPr) is phosphorylated by ATP at a seryl residue, which increases the complexity of PTS-mediated regulation. In this review, we try to summarize the known protein phosphorylation-related regulatory functions of the PTS. As we shall see, the PTS regulation network not only controls carbohydrate uptake and metabolism but also interferes with the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus and the virulence of certain pathogens.     

How Phosphotransferase System-Related Protein Phosphorylation Regulates Carbohydrate Metabolism in Bacteria

The phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) is found only in bacteria, where it catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of numerous monosaccharides, disaccharides, amino sugars, polyols, and other sugar derivatives. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport and phosphorylation, the PTS uses PEP as an energy source and phosphoryl donor. The phosphoryl group of PEP is usually transferred via four distinct proteins (domains) to the transported sugar bound to the respective membrane component(s) (EIIC and EIID) of the PTS. The organization of the PTS as a four-step phosphoryl transfer system, in which all P derivatives exhibit similar energy (phosphorylation occurs at histidyl or cysteyl residues), is surprising, as a single protein (or domain) coupling energy transfer and sugar phosphorylation would be sufficient for PTS function. A possible explanation for the complexity of the PTS was provided by the discovery that the PTS also carries out numerous regulatory functions. Depending on their phosphorylation state, the four proteins (domains) forming the PTS phosphorylation cascade (EI, HPr, EIIA, and EIIB) can phosphorylate or interact with numerous non-PTS proteins and thereby regulate their activity. In addition, in certain bacteria, one of the PTS components (HPr) is phosphorylated by ATP at a seryl residue, which increases the complexity of PTS-mediated regulation. In this review, we try to summarize the known protein phosphorylation-related regulatory functions of the PTS. As we shall see, the PTS regulation network not only controls carbohydrate uptake and metabolism but also interferes with the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus and the virulence of certain pathogens.     

Reconstitution studies using the helical and carboxy-terminal domains of enzyme I of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system

Enzyme I of the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system can be phosphorylated by PEP on an active-site histidine residue, localized to a cleft between an alpha-helical domain and an alpha/beta domain on the amino terminal half of the protein. The phosphoryl group on the active-site histidine can be passed to an active-site histidine residue of HPr. It has been proposed that the major interaction between enzyme I and HPr occurs via the alpha-helical domain of enzyme I. The isolated recombinant alpha-helical domain (residues 25-145) with approximately 80% alpha-helices as well as enzyme I deficient in that domain [EI(DeltaHD)] with approximately 50% alpha-helix content from M. capricolum were used to further elucidate the nature of the enzyme I-HPr complex. Isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrated that HPr binds to the alpha-helical domain and intact enzyme I with = 5 x 10(4) and 1.4 x 10(5) M(-)(1) at pH 7.5 and 25 degrees C, respectively, but not to EI(DeltaHD), which contains the active-site histidine of enzyme I and can be autophosphorylated by PEP. In vitro reconstitution experiments with proteins from both M. capricolum and E. coli showed that EI(DeltaHD) can donate its bound phosphoryl group to HPr in the presence of the isolated alpha-helical domain. Furthermore, M. capricolum recombinant C-terminal domain of enzyme I (EIC) was shown to reconstitute phosphotransfer activity with recombinant N-terminal domain (EIN) approximately 5% as efficiently as the HD-EI(DeltaHD) pair. Recombinant EIC strongly self-associates ( approximately 10(10) M(-)(1)) in comparison to dimerization constants of 10(5)-10(7) M(-)(1) measured for EI and EI(DeltaHD).     

Hydrophilic C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli mannitol permease: phosphorylation, functional independence, and evidence for intersubunit phosphotransfer

The mannitol-specific enzyme II (mannitol permease) of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system (PTS) catalyzes the concomitant transport and phosphorylation of D-mannitol. Previous studies have shown that the mannitol permease (637 amino acid residues) consists of 2 structural domains of roughly equal size: an N-terminal, hydrophobic, membrane-bound domain and a C-terminal, hydrophilic, cytoplasmic domain. The C-terminal domain can be released from the membrane by mild proteolysis of everted membrane vesicles [Stephan, M.M., & Jacobson, G.R. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 8230-8234]. In this report, we show that phosphorylation of the intact permease by [32P]HPr (a general phosphocarrier protein of the PTS) followed by tryptic separation of the two domains resulted in labeling of only the C-terminal domain. Phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain occurred even in the complete absence of the N-terminal domain, showing that the former contains most, if not all, of the critical residues comprising the interaction site for phospho-HPr. The phosphorylated C-terminal domain, however, could not transfer its phospho group to mannitol, suggesting that the N-terminal domain is necessary for mannitol binding and/or phosphotransfer from the enzyme to the sugar. The elution profile of the C-terminal domain after molecular sieve chromatography showed that the isolated domain is monomeric, unlike the native permease which is likely a dimer in the membrane. Experiments employing a deletion mutation of the mtlA gene, which encodes a protein lacking the first phosphorylation site in the C-terminal domain (His-554) but retaining the second phosphorylation site (Cys-384), demonstrated that a phospho group could be transferred from phospho-HPr to Cys-384 of the deletion protein, and then to mannitol, only in the presence of the full-length permease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Three-dimensional structures of protein-protein complexes in the E. coli PTS

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) includes a collection of proteins that accomplish phosphoryl transfer from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to a sugar in the course of transport. The soluble proteins of the glucose transport pathway also function as regulators of diverse systems. The mechanism of interaction of the phosphoryl carrier proteins with each other as well as with their regulation targets has been amenable to study by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The three-dimensional solution structures of the complexes between the N-terminal domain of enzyme I and HPr and between HPr and enzyme IIA(Glc) have been elucidated. An analysis of the binding interfaces of HPr with enzyme I, IIA(Glc) and glycogen phosphorylase revealed that a common surface on HPr is involved in all these interactions. Similarly, a common surface on IIA(Glc) interacts with HPr, IIB(Glc) and glycerol kinase. Thus, there is a common motif for the protein-protein interactions characteristic of the PTS.     

Lactose transport system of Streptococcus thermophilus. The role of histidine residues.

The lactose transport protein (LacS) of Streptococcus thermophilus is a chimeric protein consisting of an amino-terminal carrier domain and a carboxyl-terminal phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) IIA protein domain. The histidine residues of LacS were changed individually into glutamine or arginine residues. Of the 11 histidine residues present in LacS, only the His-376 substitution in the carrier domain significantly affected sugar transport. The region around His-376 was found to exhibit sequence similarity to the region around His-322 of the lactose transport protein (LacY) of Escherichia coli, which has been implicated in sugar binding and in coupling of sugar and H+ transport. The H376Q mutation resulted in a reduced rate of uptake and altered affinity for lactose (beta-galactoside), melibiose (alpha-galactoside), and the lactose analog methyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Similarly, the extent of accumulation of the galactosides by cells expressing LacS(H376Q) was highly reduced in comparison to cells bearing the wild-type protein. Nonequilibrium exchange of lactose and methyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside by the H376Q mutant was approximately 2-fold reduced in comparison to the activity of the wild-type transport protein. The data indicate that His-376 is involved in sugar recognition and is important, but not essential, for the cotransport of protons and galactosides. The carboxyl-terminal domain of LacS contains 2 histidine residues (His-537 and His-552) that are conserved in seven homologous IIA protein(s) (domains) of PTSs. P-enolpyruvate-dependent phosphorylation of wild-type LacS, but not of the mutant H552Q, was demonstrated using purified Enzyme I and HPr, the general energy coupling proteins of the PTS, and inside-out membrane vesicles isolated from E. coli in which the lactose transport gene was expressed. The His-537 and His-552 mutations did not affect transport activity when the corresponding genes were expressed in E. coli.     

Shikimate-3-phosphate binds to the isolated N-terminal domain of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase

5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase catalyzes the transfer of the enolpyruvyl moiety from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to shikimate-3-phosphate (S3P). Mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography data suggest that the active site of the enzyme is in the cleft between its two globular domains; however, they have not defined which residues are responsible for substrate binding and catalysis. Here we attempt to establish the binding of the substrate S3P to the isolated N-terminal domain of EPSP synthase using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry. Our experimental results indicate that there is a saturable and stable conformational change in the isolated N-terminal domain upon S3P binding and that the chemical environment of the S3P phosphorus when bound to the isolated domain is very similar to that of S3P bound to EPSP synthase. We also conclude that most of the free energy of S3P binding to EPSP synthase is contributed by the N-terminal domain.     

Lactose repressor hinge domain independently binds DNA

The short 8–10 amino acid “hinge” sequence in lactose repressor (LacI), present in other LacI/GalR family members, links DNA and inducer‐binding domains. Structural studies of full‐length or truncated LacI‐operator DNA complexes demonstrate insertion of the dimeric helical “hinge” structure at the center of the operator sequence. This association bends the DNA ～40° and aligns flanking semi‐symmetric DNA sites for optimal contact by the N‐terminal helix‐turn‐helix (HtH) sequences within each dimer. In contrast, the hinge region remains unfolded when bound to nonspecific DNA sequences. To determine ability of the hinge helix alone to mediate DNA binding, we examined (i) binding of LacI variants with deletion of residues 1–50 to remove the HtH DNA binding domain or residues 1–58 to remove both HtH and hinge domains and (ii) binding of a synthetic peptide corresponding to the hinge sequence with a Val52Cys substitution that allows reversible dimer formation via a disulfide linkage. Binding affinity for DNA is orders of magnitude lower in the absence of the helix‐turn‐helix domain with its highly positive charge. LacI missing residues 1–50 binds to DNA with ～4‐fold greater affinity for operator than for nonspecific sequences with minimal impact of inducer presence; in contrast, LacI missing residues 1–58 exhibits no detectable affinity for DNA. In oxidized form, the dimeric hinge peptide alone binds to O1 and nonspecific DNA with similarly small difference in affinity; reduction to monomer diminished binding to both O1 and nonspecific targets. These results comport with recent reports regarding LacI hinge interaction with DNA sequences.     

The Bacterial Phosphoenolpyruvate:Carbohydrate Phosphotransferase System: Regulation by Protein Phosphorylation and Phosphorylation-Dependent Protein-Protein Interactions

SUMMARY

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) carries out both catalytic and regulatory functions. It catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of a variety of sugars and sugar derivatives but also carries out numerous regulatory functions related to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphate metabolism, to chemotaxis, to potassium transport, and to the virulence of certain pathogens. For these different regulatory processes, the signal is provided by the phosphorylation state of the PTS components, which varies according to the availability of PTS substrates and the metabolic state of the cell. PEP acts as phosphoryl donor for enzyme I (EI), which, together with HPr and one of several EIIA and EIIB pairs, forms a phosphorylation cascade which allows phosphorylation of the cognate carbohydrate bound to the membrane-spanning EIIC. HPr of firmicutes and numerous proteobacteria is also phosphorylated in an ATP-dependent reaction catalyzed by the bifunctional HPr kinase/phosphorylase. PTS-mediated regulatory mechanisms are based either on direct phosphorylation of the target protein or on phosphorylation-dependent interactions. For regulation by PTS-mediated phosphorylation, the target proteins either acquired a PTS domain by fusing it to their N or C termini or integrated a specific, conserved PTS regulation domain (PRD) or, alternatively, developed their own specific sites for PTS-mediated phosphorylation. Protein-protein interactions can occur with either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PTS components and can either stimulate or inhibit the function of the target proteins. This large variety of signal transduction mechanisms allows the PTS to regulate numerous proteins and to form a vast regulatory network responding to the phosphorylation state of various PTS components.     

Structural basis for antifreeze activity of ice-binding protein from arctic yeast

Arctic yeast Leucosporidium sp. produces a glycosylated ice-binding protein (LeIBP) with a molecular mass of ～25 kDa, which can lower the freezing point below the melting point once it binds to ice. LeIBP is a member of a large class of ice-binding proteins, the structures of which are unknown. Here, we report the crystal structures of non-glycosylated LeIBP and glycosylated LeIBP at 1.57- and 2.43-? resolution, respectively. Structural analysis of the LeIBPs revealed a dimeric right-handed β-helix fold, which is composed of three parts: a large coiled structural domain, a long helix region (residues 96-115 form a long α-helix that packs along one face of the β-helix), and a C-terminal hydrophobic loop region ((243)PFVPAPEVV(251)). Unexpectedly, the C-terminal hydrophobic loop region has an extended conformation pointing away from the body of the coiled structural domain and forms intertwined dimer interactions. In addition, structural analysis of glycosylated LeIBP with sugar moieties attached to Asn(185) provides a basis for interpreting previous biochemical analyses as well as the increased stability and secretion of glycosylated LeIBP. We also determined that the aligned Thr/Ser/Ala residues are critical for ice binding within the B face of LeIBP using site-directed mutagenesis. Although LeIBP has a common β-helical fold similar to that of canonical hyperactive antifreeze proteins, the ice-binding site is more complex and does not have a simple ice-binding motif. In conclusion, we could identify the ice-binding site of LeIBP and discuss differences in the ice-binding modes compared with other known antifreeze proteins and ice-binding proteins.     

Cutting edge: structural basis for the recognition of β-linked glycolipid antigens by invariant NKT cells

Invariant NKT (iNKT) cells expressing a semi-invariant Vα14 TCR recognize self and foreign lipid Ags when presented by the nonclassical MHCI homolog CD1d. Whereas the majority of known iNKT cell Ags are characterized by the presence of a single α-linked sugar, mammalian self Ags are β-linked glycosphingolipids, posing the interesting question of how the semi-invariant TCR can bind to such structurally distinct ligands. In this study, we show that the mouse iNKT TCR recognizes the complex β-linked Ag isoglobotrihexosylceramide (iGb3; Galα1-3-Galβ1-4-Glcβ1-1Cer) by forcing the proximal β-linked sugar of the trisaccharide head group to adopt the typical binding orientation of α-linked glycolipids. The squashed iGb3 orientation is stabilized by several interactions between the trisaccharide and CD1d residues. Finally, the formation of novel contacts between the proximal and second sugar of iGb3 and CDR2α residues of the TCR suggests an expanded recognition logic that can possibly distinguish foreign Ags from self Ags.