The role of RNA structure in the interaction of U1A protein with U1 hairpin II RNA

The N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM1) of the spliceosomal protein U1A interacting with its target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) has been used as a paradigm for RRM-containing proteins interacting with their RNA targets. U1A binds to U1hpII via direct interactions with a 7-nucleotide (nt) consensus binding sequence at the 5' end of a 10-nt loop, and via hydrogen bonds with the closing C-G base pair at the top of the RNA stem. Using surface plasmon resonance (Biacore), we have examined the role of structural features of U1hpII in binding to U1A RRM1. Mutational analysis of the closing base pair suggests it plays a minor role in binding and mainly prevents "breathing" of the loop. Lengthening the stem and nontarget part of the loop suggests that the increased negative charge of the RNA might slightly aid association. However, this is offset by an increase in dissociation, which may be caused by attraction of the RRM to nontarget parts of the RNA. Studies of a single stranded target and RNAs with untethered loops indicate that structure is not very relevant for association but is important for complex stability. In particular, breaking the link between the stem and the 5' side of the loop greatly increases complex dissociation, presumably by hindering simultaneous contacts between the RRM and stem and loop nucleotides. While binding of U1A to a single stranded target is much weaker than to U1hpII, it occurs with nanomolar affinity, supporting recent evidence that binding of unstructured RNA by U1A has physiological significance.     

Inhibition of the U1A-RNA complex by an aminoacridine derivative

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the most common RNA binding domains. There have been few investigations of small molecule inhibitors of RRM-RNA complexes, although these inhibitors could be valuable tools for probing biological processes involving RRM-RNA complexes and would have the potential to be effective drugs. In this paper, the inhibition by small molecules of the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA has been investigated. An aminoacridine derivative has been found to promote dissociation of the U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex with an IC(50) value of 1 microM. Fluorescence experiments indicate that two aminoacridine ligands bind to each RNA target site. RNase A footprinting suggests that one binding site may be near the base pair that closes the loop and the other may be in a more flexible region of the loop. The addition of the aminoacridine derivative to stem loop 2 RNA increases the susceptibility of other portions of the loop to digestion by RNase A, which implies that binding of the ligand changes the conformation or dynamics of the stem loop target site. Either direct binding to the RNA or indirect alteration of the structure or dynamics of the loop would be likely to inhibit binding of the U1A protein to this RNA.     

Functional stabilization of an RNA recognition motif by a noncanonical N-terminal expansion

RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) constitute versatile macromolecular interaction platforms. They are found in many components of spliceosomes, in which they mediate RNA and protein interactions by diverse molecular strategies. The human U11/U12-65K protein of the minor spliceosome employs a C-terminal RRM to bind hairpin III of the U12 small nuclear RNA (snRNA). This interaction comprises one side of a molecular bridge between the U11 and U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and is reminiscent of the binding of the N-terminal RRMs in the major spliceosomal U1A and U2B″ proteins to hairpins in their cognate snRNAs. Here we show by mutagenesis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays that the β-sheet surface and a neighboring loop of 65K C-terminal RRM are involved in RNA binding, as previously seen in canonical RRMs like the N-terminal RRMs of the U1A and U2B″ proteins. However, unlike U1A and U2B″, some 30 residues N-terminal of the 65K C-terminal RRM core are additionally required for stable U12 snRNA binding. The crystal structure of the expanded 65K C-terminal RRM revealed that the N-terminal tail adopts an α-helical conformation and wraps around the protein toward the face opposite the RNA-binding platform. Point mutations in this part of the protein had only minor effects on RNA affinity. Removal of the N-terminal extension significantly decreased the thermal stability of the 65K C-terminal RRM. These results demonstrate that the 65K C-terminal RRM is augmented by an N-terminal element that confers stability to the domain, and thereby facilitates stable RNA binding.     

Complex role of the beta 2-beta 3 loop in the interaction of U1A with U1 hairpin II RNA

RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) are characterized by highly conserved regions located centrally on a beta-sheet, which forms the RNA binding surface. Variable flanking regions, such as the loop connecting beta-strands 2 and 3, are thought to be important in determining the RNA-binding specificities of individual RRMs. The N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal U1A protein mediates binding to an RNA hairpin (U1hpII) in the U1 small nuclear RNA. In this complex, the beta(2)-beta(3) loop protrudes through the 10-nucleotide RNA loop. Shortening of the RNA loop strongly perturbs binding, suggesting that an optimal "fit" of the beta(2)-beta(3) loop into the RNA loop is an important factor in complexation. To understand this interaction further, we mutated or deleted loop residues Lys(50) and Met(51), which protrude centrally into the RNA loop but do not make any direct contacts to the bases. Using BIACORE, we analyzed the ability of these U1A mutants to bind to wild type RNAs, or RNAs with shortened loops. Alanine replacement mutations only modestly affected binding to wild type U1hpII. Interestingly, simultaneous replacement of Lys(50) and Met(51) with alanine appeared to alleviate the loss of binding caused by shortening of the RNA loop. Deletion of Lys(50) or Met(51) caused a dramatic loss in stability of the U1A.U1hpII complex. However, deletion of both residues simultaneously was much less deleterious. Simulated annealing molecular dynamics analyses suggest this is due to the ability of this mutant to rearrange flanking amino acids to substitute for the two deleted residues. The double deletion mutant also exhibited substantially reduced negative effects of RNA loop shortening, suggesting the rearranged loop is better able to accommodate a short RNA loop. Our results indicate that one of the roles of the beta(2)-beta(3) loop is to provide a steric fit into the RNA loop, thereby stabilizing the RNA.protein complex.     

Substitution of an essential adenine in the U1A-RNA complex with a non-polar isostere

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) binds to single-stranded RNA target sites of diverse sequences and structures. A conserved mode of base recognition by the RRM involves the simultaneous formation of a network of hydrogen bonds with the base functional groups and a stacking interaction between the base and a highly conserved aromatic amino acid. We have investigated the energetic contribution of the functional groups involved in the recognition of an essential adenine, A6, in stem–loop 2 of U1 snRNA by the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein. Previously, we found that elimination of individual hydrogen bond donors and acceptors on A6 destabilized the complex by 0.8–1.9 kcal/mol, while mutation of the aromatic amino acid (Phe56) that stacks with A6 to Ala destabilized the complex by 5.5 kcal/mol. Here we continue to probe the contribution of A6 to complex stability through mutation of both the RNA and protein. We have removed two hydrogen-bonding functional groups by introducing a U1A mutation, Ser91Ala, and replacing A6 with tubercidin, purine, or 1-deazaadenine. We find that the complex is destabilized an additional 1.2–2.6 kcal/mol by the elimination of the second hydrogen bond donor or acceptor. Surprisingly, deletion of all of the functional groups involved in hydrogen bonds with the U1A protein by substituting adenine with 4-methylindole reduced the binding free energy by only 2.0 kcal/mol. Experiments with U1A proteins containing mutations of Phe56 suggested that improved stacking interactions due to the greater hydrophobicity of 4-methylindole than adenine may be partly responsible for the small destabilization of the complex upon substitution of 4-methylindole for A6. The data imply that hydrophobic interactions can compensate energetically for the disruption of the complex hydrogen-bonding network between nucleotide and protein.     

Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein

Three highly conserved aromatic residues in RNA recognition motifs (RRM) participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases upon binding RNA. We have investigated the contribution of one of these aromatic residues, Phe56, to the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal protein U1A and stem–loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previous work showed that the aromatic group is important for high affinity binding. Here we probe how mutation of Phe56 affects the kinetics of complex dissociation, the strength of the hydrogen bonds formed between U1A and the base that stacks with Phe56 (A6) and specific target site recognition. Substitution of Phe56 with Trp or Tyr increased the rate of dissociation of the complex, consistent with previously reported results. However, substitution of Phe56 with His decreased the rate of complex association, implying a change in the initial formation of the complex. Simultaneous modification of residue 56 and A6 revealed energetic coupling between the aromatic group and the functional groups of A6 that hydrogen bond to U1A. Finally, mutation of Phe56 to Leu reduced the ability of U1A to recognize stem–loop 2 correctly. Taken together, these experiments suggest that Phe56 contributes to binding affinity by stacking with A6 and participating in networks of energetically coupled interactions that enable this conserved aromatic amino acid to play a complex role in target site recognition.     

Molecular dynamics simulation studies of a protein-RNA complex with a selectively modified binding interface

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the most common RNA binding domains. We have investigated the contribution of three highly conserved aromatic amino acids to RNA binding by the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein. Recently, we synthesized a modified base (A-4CPh) in which a phenyl group is tethered to adenine using a linker of 4 methylene groups. The substitution of this base for adenine in the target RNA selectively stabilizes the complex formed with a U1A protein in which one of the conserved aromatic amino acids is replaced with Ala (Phe56Ala). In this article, we report molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that probe the structural consequences of the substitution of A-4CPh for adenine in the wild type and Phe56Ala U1A-RNA complexes and in the free RNA. The simulations suggest that A-4CPh stabilizes the complex formed with Phe56Ala by adopting a folded conformation in which the tethered phenyl group fills the site occupied by the phenyl group of Phe56 in the wild-type complex. In contrast, an extended conformation of A-4CPh is predicted to be most stable in the complex formed with the wild-type protein. The calculations indicate A-4CPh is in an extended conformation in the free RNA. Therefore, preorganizing the structure of the phenyl-tethered base for binding may improve both the affinity and specificity of the RNA containing A-4CPh for the Phe56Ala U1A protein. Taken together, the previous experimental work and the calculations reported here suggest a general design strategy for altering RRM-RNA complex stability.     

Altering the RNA-binding mode of the U1A RBD1 protein

The N-terminal RNA-binding domain (RBD1) of the human U1A protein is evolutionarily designed to bind its RNA targets with great affinity and specificity. The physical mechanisms that modulate the coupling (local cooperativity) among amino acid residues on the extensive binding surface of RBD1 are investigated here, using mutants that replace a highly conserved glycine residue. This glycine residue, at the strand/loop junction of beta3/loop3, is found in U1A RBD1, and in most RBD domains, suggesting it has a specific role in modulation of RNA binding. Here, two RBD1 proteins are constructed in which that residue (Gly53) is replaced by either alanine or valine. These new proteins are shown by NMR methods and molecular dynamics simulations to be very similar to the wild-type RBD1, both in structure and in their backbone dynamics. However, RNA-binding assays show that affinity for the U1 snRNA stem-loop II RNA target is reduced by nearly 200-fold for the RBD1-G53A protein, and by 1.6 x 10(4)-fold for RBD1-G53V. The mode of RNA binding by RBD1-G53A is similar to that of RBD1-WT, displaying its characteristic non-additive free energies of base recognition and its salt-dependence. The binding mode of RBD1-G53V is altered, having lost its salt-dependence and displaying site-independence of base recognition. The molecular basis for this alteration in RNA-binding properties is proposed to result from the inability of the RNA to induce a change in the structure of the free protein to produce a high-affinity complex.     

The role of the C-terminal helix of U1A protein in the interaction with U1hpII RNA

Previous kinetic investigations of the N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain of spliceosomal A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1A) interacting with its RNA target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) provided experimental evidence for a ‘lure and lock’ model of binding. The final step of locking has been proposed to involve conformational changes in an α-helix immediately C-terminal to the RRM domain (helix C), which occludes the RNA binding surface in the unbound protein. Helix C must shift its position to accommodate RNA binding in the RNA–protein complex. This results in a new hydrophobic core, an intraprotein hydrogen bond and a quadruple stacking interaction between U1A and U1hpII. Here, we used a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor to gain mechanistic insight into the role of helix C in mediating the interaction with U1hpII. Truncation, removal or disruption of the helix exposes the RNA-binding surface, resulting in an increase in the association rate, while simultaneously reducing the ability of the complex to lock, reflected in a loss of complex stability. Disruption of the quadruple stacking interaction has minor kinetic effects when compared with removal of the intraprotein hydrogen bonds. These data provide new insights into the mechanism whereby sequences C-terminal to an RRM can influence RNA binding.     

Structure and functional implications of a complex containing a segment of U6 RNA bound by a domain of Prp24

U6 RNA plays a critical role in pre-mRNA splicing. Assembly of U6 into the spliceosome requires a significant structural rearrangement and base-pairing with U4 RNA. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, this process requires the essential splicing factor Prp24. We present the characterization and structure of a complex containing one of Prp24''s four RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains, RRM2, and a fragment of U6 RNA. NMR methods were used to identify the preferred U6 binding sequence of RRM2 (5′-GAGA-3′), measure the affinity of the interaction, and solve the structure of RRM2 bound to the hexaribonucleotide AGAGAU. Interdomain contacts observed between RRM2 and RRM3 in a crystal structure of the free protein are not detectable in solution. A structural model of RRM1 and RRM2 bound to a longer segment of U6 RNA is presented, and a partial mechanism for Prp24''s annealing activity is proposed.     

The testis-specific human protein RBMY recognizes RNA through a novel mode of interaction

The RBMY (RNA-binding motif gene on Y chromosome) protein encoded by the human Y chromosome is important for normal sperm development. Although its precise molecular RNA targets are unknown at present, it is suggested that human RBMY (hRBMY) participates in splicing in the testis. Using systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment, we found that RNA stem-loops capped by a C(A)/(U)CAA pentaloop are high-affinity binding targets for hRBMY. Subsequent nuclear magnetic resonance structural determination of the hRBMY RNA recognition motif (RRM) in complex with a high-affinity target showed two distinct modes of RNA recognition. First, the RRM beta-sheet surface binds to the RNA loop in a sequence-specific fashion. Second, the beta2-beta3 loop of the hRBMY inserts into the major groove of the RNA stem. The first binding mode might be conserved in the paralogous protein heterogeneous nuclear RNP G, whereas the second mode of binding is found only in hRBMY. This structural difference could be at the origin of the function of RBMY in spermatogenesis.     

The crystal structure of human isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase at 1.7 A resolution reveals its catalytic mechanism in isoprenoid biosynthesis

The essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-messenger RNA splicing protein 24 (Prp24) has four RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and facilitates U6 RNA base-pairing with U4 RNA during spliceosome assembly. Prp24 is a component of the free U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) but not the U4/U6 bi-snRNP, and so is thought to be displaced from U6 by U4/U6 base-pairing. The interaction partners of each of the four RRMs of Prp24 and how these interactions direct U4/U6 pairing are not known. Here we report the crystal structure of the first three RRMs and the solution structure of the first two RRMs of Prp24. Strikingly, RRM 2 forms extensive inter-domain contacts with RRMs 1 and 3. These contacts occupy much of the canonical RNA-binding faces (beta-sheets) of RRMs 1 and 2, but leave the beta-sheet of RRM 3 exposed. Previously identified substitutions in Prp24 that suppress mutations in U4 and U6 spliceosomal RNAs cluster primarily in the beta-sheet of RRM 3, but also in a conserved loop of RRM 2. RNA binding assays and chemical shift mapping indicate that a large basic patch evident on the surface of RRMs 1 and 2 is part of a high affinity U6 RNA binding site. Our results suggest that Prp24 binds free U6 RNA primarily with RRMs 1 and 2, which may remodel the U6 secondary structure. The beta-sheet of RRM 3 then influences U4/U6 pairing through interaction with an unidentified ligand.     

U1A protein-stem loop 2 RNA recognition: prediction of structural differences from protein mutations

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out to compare the free and bound structures of wild type U1A protein with several Phe56 mutant U1A proteins that bind the target stem loop 2 (SL2) RNA with a range of affinities. The simulations indicate the free U1A protein is more flexible than the U1A-RNA complex for both wild type and Phe56 mutant systems. A complete analysis of the hydrogen-bonding (HB) and non-bonded (VDW) interactions over the course of the MD simulations suggested that changes in the interactions in the free U1A protein caused by the Phe56Ala and Phe56Leu mutations may stabilize the helical character in loop 3, and contribute to the weak binding of these proteins to SL2 RNA. Compared with wild type, changes in HB and VDW interactions in Phe56 mutants of the free U1A protein are global, and include differences in β-sheet, loop 1 and loop 3 interactions. In the U1A-RNA complex, the Phe56Ala mutation leads to a series of differences in interactions that resonate through the complex, while the Phe56Leu and Phe56Trp mutations cause local differences around the site of mutation. The long-range networks of interactions identified in the simulations suggest that direct interactions and dynamic processes in both the free and bound forms contribute to complex stability.     

The N- and C-terminal RNA recognition motifs of splicing factor Prp24 have distinct functions in U6 RNA binding

Prp24 is an essential yeast U6 snRNP protein with four RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) that facilitates the association of U4 and U6 snRNPs during spliceosome assembly. Genetic interactions led to the proposal that RRMs 2 and 3 of Prp24 bind U6 RNA, while RRMs 1 and 4 bind U4 RNA. However, the function of each RRM has yet to be established through biochemical means. We compared the binding of recombinant full-length Prp24 and truncated forms lacking RRM 1 or RRM 4 with U6 RNA. Contrary to expectations, we found that the N-terminal segment containing RRM 1 is important for high-affinity binding to U6 RNA and for discrimination between wild-type U6 RNA and U6 with point mutations in the 3' intramolecular stem-loop. In contrast, deletion of RRM 4 and the C terminus did not significantly alter the affinity for U6 RNA, but resulted in the formation of higher order Prp24.U6 complexes. Truncation and internal deletion of U6 RNA mapped three Prp24-binding sites, with the central site providing most of the affinity for Prp24. A newly identified temperature-sensitive lethal point mutation in RRM 1 is exacerbated by mutations in the U6 RNA telestem, as is a mutation in RRM 2, but not one in RRM 3. We propose that RRMs 1 and 2 of yeast Prp24 bind the same central site in U6 RNA that is bound by the two RRMs of human Prp24, and that RRMs 3 and 4 bind lower affinity flanking sites, thereby restricting the stoichiometry of Prp24 binding.     

A study of collective atomic fluctuations and cooperativity in the U1A-RNA complex based on molecular dynamics simulations

Cooperative interactions play an important role in recognition and binding in macromolecular systems. In this study, we find that cross-correlated atomic fluctuations can be used to identify cooperative networks in a protein–RNA system. The dynamics of the RRM-containing protein U1A–stem loop 2 RNA complex have been calculated theoretically from a 10 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The simulation was analyzed by calculating the covariance matrix of all atomic fluctuations. These matrix elements are then presented in the form of a two-dimensional grid, which displays fluctuations on a per residue basis. The results indicate the presence of strong, selective cross-correlated fluctuations throughout the RRM in U1A–RNA. The atomic fluctuations correspond well with previous biophysical studies in which a multiplicity of cooperative networks have been reported and indicate that the various networks identified in separate individual experiments are fluctuationally correlated into a hyper-network encompassing most of the RRM. The calculated results also correspond well with independent results from a statistical covariance analysis of 330 aligned RRM sequences. This method has significant implications as a predictive tool regarding cooperativity in the protein–nucleic acid recognition process.     

Functional analysis of SNF, the Drosophila U1A/U2B" homolog: identification of dispensable and indispensable motifs for both snRNP assembly and function in vivo

In Drosophila, the spliceosomal protein SNF fulfills the functions of two vertebrate proteins, U1 snRNP-UlA and U2 snRNP-U2B". The structure and sequence of SNF, U1A, and U2B" are nearly identical with two RNA recognition motifs (RRM) separated by a short linker region, yet they have different RNA-binding properties: U1A binds U1 snRNA, U2B" binds U2 snRNA, and SNF binds both snRNAs. Structure/function studies on the human proteins have identified motifs in the N-terminal RRM that are critical for RNA-binding specificity but have failed to identify a function for the C-terminal RRM. Interestingly, SNF is chimeric in these motifs, suggesting a basis for its dual specificity. Here, we test the importance of these motifs by introducing site-directed mutations in the snf coding region and examining the effects of these mutations on assembly into the snRNP and on snf function in vivo. We found that an N-terminal RRM mutant protein predicted to eliminate RNA binding still assembles into snRNPs and is capable of rescuing snf's lethal phenotype only if the normally dispensable C-terminal RRM is present. We also found that the mixed motif in the "RNA-specificity" domain is necessary for SNF's dual function whereas the mixed motif in the U2A'-protein-binding region is not. Finally, we demonstrate that animals carrying a snf mutation that converts SNF from a bifunctional protein to a U1 snRNP-specific protein are viable. This unexpected result suggests that SNF's presence within the U2 snRNP is not essential for splicing.     

Characterization of an anti-RNA recombinant autoantibody fragment (scFv) isolated from a phage display library and detailed analysis of its binding site on U1 snRNA.

This is the first study in which the complex of a monoclonal autoantibody fragment and its target, stem loop II of U1 snRNA, was investigated with enzymatic and chemical probing. A phage display antibody library derived from bone marrow cells of an SLE patient was used for selection of scFvs specific for stem loop II. The scFv specificity was tested by RNA immunoprecipitation and nitrocellulose filter binding competition experiments. Immunofluorescence data and immunoprecipitation of U1 snRNPs containing U1A protein, pointed to an scFv binding site different from the U1A binding site. The scFv binding site on stem loop II was determined by footprinting experiments using RNase A, RNase V1, and hydroxyl radicals. The results show that the binding site covers three sequence elements on the RNA, one on the 5' strand of the stem and two on the 3' strand. Hypersensitivity of three loop nucleotides suggests a conformational change of the RNA upon antibody binding. A three-dimensional representation of stem loop II reveals a juxtapositioning of the three protected regions on one side of the helix, spanning approximately one helical turn. The location of the scFv binding site on stem loop II is in full agreement with the finding that both the U1A protein and the scFv are able to bind stem loop II simultaneously. As a consequence, this recombinant monoclonal anti-U1 snRNA scFv might be very useful in studies on U1 snRNPs and its involvement in cellular processes like splicing.     

Kinetic analysis of the role of the tyrosine 13, phenylalanine 56 and glutamine 54 network in the U1A/U1 hairpin II interaction

The A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle, interacting with its stem–loop RNA target (U1hpII), is frequently used as a paradigm for RNA binding by recognition motif domains (RRMs). U1A/U1hpII complex formation has been proposed to consist of at least two steps: electrostatically mediated alignment of both molecules followed by locking into place, based on the establishment of close-range interactions. The sequence of events between alignment and locking remains obscure. Here we examine the roles of three critical residues, Tyr13, Phe56 and Gln54, in complex formation and stability using Biacore. Our mutational and kinetic data suggest that Tyr13 plays a more important role than Phe56 in complex formation. Mutational analysis of Gln54, combined with molecular dynamics studies, points to Arg52 as another key residue in association. Based on our data and previous structural and modeling studies, we propose that electrostatic alignment of the molecules is followed by hydrogen bond formation between the RNA and Arg52, and the sequential establishment of interactions with loop bases (including Tyr13). A quadruple stack, sandwiching two bases between Phe56 and Asp92, would occur last and coincide with the rearrangement of a C-terminal helix that partially occludes the RRM surface in the free protein.