Regulation of the Cell Cycle by Focal Adhesion Kinase

In this report, we have analyzed the potential role and mechanisms of integrin signaling through FAK in cell cycle regulation by using tetracycline-regulated expression of exogenous FAK and mutants. We have found that overexpression of wild-type FAK accelerated G1 to S phase transition. Conversely, overexpression of a dominant-negative FAK mutant ΔC14 inhibited cell cycle progression at G1 phase and this inhibition required the Y397 in ΔC14. Biochemical analyses indicated that FAK mutant ΔC14 was mislocalized and functioned as a dominant-negative mutant by competing with endogenous FAK in focal contacts for binding signaling molecules such as Src and Fyn, resulting in a decreases of Erk activation in cell adhesion. Consistent with this, we also observed inhibition of BrdU incorporation and Erk activation by FAK Y397F mutant and FRNK, but not FRNKΔC14, in transient transfection assays using primary human foreskin fibroblasts. Finally, we also found that ΔC14 blocked cyclin D1 upregulation and induced p21 expression, while wild-type FAK increased cyclin D1 expression and decreased p21 expression. Taken together, these results have identified FAK and its associated signaling pathways as a mediator of the cell cycle regulation by integrins.     

p27Kip1 and cyclin D1 are necessary for focal adhesion kinase regulation of cell cycle progression in glioblastoma cells propagated in vitro and in vivo in the scid mouse brain

We have reported previously that the expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is elevated in glioblastomas and that expression of FAK promotes the proliferation of glioblastoma cells propagated in either soft agar or in the C.B.17 severe combined immunodeficiency (scid) mouse brain. We therefore determined the effect of FAK on cell cycle progression in these cells. We found that overexpression of wild-type FAK promoted exit from G(1) in monolayer cultures of glioblastoma cells, enhanced the expression of cyclins D1 and E while reducing the expression of p27(Kip1) and p21(Waf1), and enhanced the kinase activity of the cyclin D1-cyclin-dependent kinase-4 (cdk4) complex. Transfection of the monolayers with a FAK molecule in which the autophosphorylation site is mutated (FAK397F) inhibited exit from G(1) and reduced the expression of cyclins D1 and E while enhancing the expression of p27(Kip1) and p21(Waf1). Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated down-regulation of cyclin D1 inhibited the enhancement of cell cycle progression observed on expression of wild-type FAK, whereas siRNA-mediated down-regulation of cyclin E had no effect. siRNA-mediated down-regulation of p27(Kip1) overcame the inhibition of cell cycle progression observed on expression of FAK397F, whereas down-regulation of p21(Waf1) had no effect. These results were confirmed in vivo in the scid mouse brain xenograft model in which propagation of glioblastoma cells expressing FAK397F resulted in a 50% inhibition of tumor growth and inhibited exit from G(1). Taken together, our results indicate that FAK promotes proliferation of glioblastoma cells by enhancing exit from G(1) through a mechanism that involves cyclin D1 and p27(Kip1).     

Analysis of FAK-associated signaling pathways in the regulation of cell cycle progression

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is an important mediator of signal transduction pathways initiated by integrins in cell migration, survival and cell cycle regulation. The ability of FAK to mediate integrin signaling in the regulation of cell cycle progression depends on the phosphorylation of Tyr397, which implies a functional significance for the formation of FAK signaling complexes with Src, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and Grb7. We have previously described a FAK mutant, D395A, that selectively disrupts FAK binding to PI3K, but allows FAK association with Src. Using this mutation in a mislocalized FAK mutant background, we show here that formation of a FAK/PI3K complex is not sufficient for cell cycle progression but the formation of a FAK/Src complex plays an essential role. We also show that mutation of D395 to A disrupted FAK association with Grb7. This suggests that a FAK/Grb7 complex is not involved in the cell cycle regulation either, which is supported by direct analysis of cells expressing a dominant negative Grb7 construct. Finally, we provide evidence that the Src-dependent association of FAK with Grb2 and p130(Cas) are both required for the regulation of cell cycle progression by FAK. Together, these studies identify important FAK downstream signaling pathways in cell cycle regulation.     

Krüppel样转录因子8(KLF8)的结构及功能

Krüppel样转录因子8(Krüppel-like factor 8,KLF8)是KLFs家族中的一员.KLF8在羧基端含有3个保守的C2H2锌指结构域,用于与DNA结合.KLF8的转录受粘着斑激酶(focal adhesion kinase,FAK)、KLF1(erythroid krüppel-like fact...     

Bcl-2 induces cyclin D1 promoter activity in human breast epithelial cells independent of cell anchorage

Cyclin D1 expression is co-regulated by growth factor and cell adhesion signaling. Cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is essential for cyclin D1 expression. Upon the loss of cell adhesion, cyclin D1 expression is downregulated, followed by apoptosis in normal epithelial cells. Since bcl-2 prevents apoptosis induced by the loss of cell adhesion, we hypothesized that bcl-2 induces survival signaling complementary to cell adhesion-mediated gene regulation. In the present study, we investigated the role of bcl-2 on FAK activity and cyclin D1 expression. We found that bcl-2 overexpression induces cyclin D1 expression in human breast epithelial cell line MCF10A independent of cell anchorage. Increased cyclin D1 expression in stable bcl-2 transfectants is not related to bcl-2-increased G1 duration, but results from cyclin D1 promoter activation. Transient transfection studies confirmed anchorage-independent bcl-2 induction of cyclin D1 promoter activity in human breast epithelial cell lines (MCF10A, BT549, and MCF-7). We provide evidence that bcl-2 induction of cyclin D1 expression involves constitutive activation of focal adhesion kinase, regardless of cell adhesion. The present study suggests a potential oncogenic activity for bcl-2 through cyclin D1 induction, and provides an insight into the distinct proliferation-independent pathway leading to increased cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer.     

Growth factor, steroid, and steroid antagonist regulation of cyclin gene expression associated with changes in T-47D human breast cancer cell cycle progression.

Cyclins and proto-oncogenes including c-myc have been implicated in eukaryotic cell cycle control. The role of cyclins in steroidal regulation of cell proliferation is unknown, but a role for c-myc has been suggested. This study investigated the relationship between regulation of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression, particularly by steroids and their antagonists, and changes in the levels of expression of these genes. Sequential induction of cyclins D1 (early G1 phase), D3, E, A (late G1-early S phase), and B1 (G2 phase) was observed following insulin stimulation of cell cycle progression in serum-free medium. Transient acceleration of G1-phase cells by progestin was also accompanied by rapid induction of cyclin D1, apparent within 2 h. This early induction of cyclin D1 and the ability of delayed administration of antiprogestin to antagonize progestin-induced increases in both cyclin D1 mRNA and the proportion of cells in S phase support a central role for cyclin D1 in mediating the mitogenic response in T-47D cells. Compatible with this hypothesis, antiestrogen treatment reduced the expression of cyclin D1 approximately 8 h before changes in cell cycle phase distribution accompanying growth inhibition. In the absence of progestin, antiprogestin treatment inhibited T-47D cell cycle progression but in contrast did not decrease cyclin D1 expression. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 gene expression are often, but not invariably, associated with changes in the rate of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression. However, both antiestrogen and antiprogestin depleted c-myc mRNA by > 80% within 2 h. These data suggest the involvement of both cyclin D1 and c-myc in the steroidal control of breast cancer cell cycle progression.     

Focal adhesion kinase mediates endothelin-induced cyclin D3 expression in rat cultured astrocytes

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a non-receptor type tyrosine kinase, is involved in the G1/S phase cell cycle transition of astrocytes induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1). In this study, the roles of FAK in the expression of cyclin D1 or D3, which are pivotal in G1/S phase transition, were examined in cultured astrocytes. Accompanied with increases in bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, ET-1 (100 nm) increased the numbers of cyclin D1- and D3-positive astrocytes. PD98059 (a MEK inhibitor) and PP-2 (a Src kinase inhibitor) inhibited ET-induced cyclin D1 expression and BrdU incorporation without affecting cyclin D3 expression. In contrast, cytochalasin D, lovastatin (a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor) and Y-27632 (a rho-kinase inhibitor) prevented both cyclin D3 expression and BrdU incorporation. FAK phosphorylation by ET-1 was inhibited by cytochalasin D, lovastatin and Y-27632, but not by PD98059 or PP-2. Transfection with wild-type FAK increased expression of cyclin D3 in astrocytes, while that of cyclin D1 was not affected. Dominant-negative FAK mutants prevented an ET-induced increase in cyclin D3 expression, but not D1. These results suggest that activation of FAK causes cyclin D3 expression in cultured astrocytes, which would underlie the FAK-mediated astrocytic G1/S phase transition by ET-1.     

Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 but not cyclin E induces anchorage-independent cell cycle progression.

Normal fibroblasts are dependent on adhesion to a substrate for cell cycle progression. Adhesion-deprived Rat1 cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, with low cyclin E-dependent kinase activity, low levels of cyclin D1 protein, and high levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. To understand the signal transduction pathway underlying adhesion-dependent growth, it is important to know whether prevention of any one of these down-regulation events under conditions of adhesion deprivation is sufficient to prevent the G1 arrest. To that end, sublines of Rat1 fibroblasts capable of expressing cyclin E, cyclin D1, or both in an inducible manner were used. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 was sufficient to allow cells to enter S phase in an adhesion-independent manner. In contrast, cells expressing exogenous cyclin E at a level high enough to overcome the p27kip1-imposed inhibition of cyclin E-dependent kinase activity still arrested in G1 when deprived of adhesion. Moreover, expression of both cyclins D1 and E in the same cells did not confer any additional growth advantage upon adhesion deprivation compared to the expression of cyclin D1 alone. Exogenously expressed cyclin D1 was down-regulated under conditions of adhesion deprivation, despite the fact that it was expressed from a heterologous promoter. The ability of cyclin D1-induced cells to enter S phase in an adhesion-independent manner disappears as soon as cyclin D1 proteins disappear. These results suggest that adhesion-dependent cell cycle progression is mediated through cyclin D1, at least in Rat1 fibroblasts.     

Ras links growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1.

Activation of growth factor receptors by ligand binding initiates a cascade of events leading to cell growth and division. Progression through the cell cycle is controlled by cyclin-dependent protein kinases (Cdks), but the mechanisms that link growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery have not been established. We report here that Ras proteins play a key role in integrating mitogenic signals with cell cycle progression through G1. Ras is required for cell cycle progression and activation of both Cdk2 and Cdk4 until approximately 2 h before the G1/S transition, corresponding to the restriction point. Analysis of Cdk-cyclin complexes indicates that Ras signaling is required both for induction of cyclin D1 and for downregulation of the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1. Constitutive expression of cyclin D1 circumvents the requirement for Ras signaling in cell proliferation, indicating that regulation of cyclin D1 is a critical target of the Ras signaling cascade.     

Downregulation and antiproliferative role of FHL3 in breast cancer

Four and a half LIM domain (FHL) protein 3 is a member of the FHL protein family that plays roles in the regulation of signal transduction, cell adhesion, survival, and mobility. FHL3 has been implicated in the development and progression of liver cancer. However, the biological function of FHL3 in other cancers remains unclear. Here, we show that FHL3 is downregulated in breast cancer patients. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown and/or overexpression experiments, we demonstrated that FHL3 suppressed anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of human breast cancer cells. The antiproliferative effects of FHL3 on breast cancer cell growth were associated with both the G1 and the G2/M cell cycle arrest, which was accompanied by a marked inhibition of the G1-phase marker cyclin D1 and the G2/M-phase marker cyclin B1 as well as the induction of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21 (WAF1/CIP1), a negative regulator of cell cycle progression at G1 and G2. These results suggest that FHL3 may play a role in the development and progression of breast cancer, and thereby may be a potential target for human breast cancer gene therapy.     

Differential activation of ERK and Rac mediates the proliferative and anti-proliferative effects of hyaluronan and CD44

Hyaluronan, a widely distributed component of the extracellular matrix, exists in a high molecular weight (native) form and lower molecular weight form (HMW- and LMW-HA, respectively). These different forms of hyaluronan bind to CD44 but elicit distinct effects on cellular function. A striking example is the opposing effects of HMW- and LMW-HA on the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells; the binding of HMW-HA to CD44 inhibits cell cycle progression, whereas the binding of LMW-HA to CD44 stimulates cell cycle progression. We now report that cyclin D1 is the primary target of LMW-HA in human vascular smooth muscle cells, as it is for HMW-HA, and that the opposing cell cycle effects of these CD44 ligands result from differential regulation of signaling pathways to cyclin D1. HMW-HA binding to CD44 selectively inhibits the GTP loading of Rac and Rac-dependent signaling to the cyclin D1 gene, whereas LMW-HA binding to CD44 selectively stimulates ERK activation and ERK-dependent cyclin D1 gene expression. These data describe a novel mechanism of growth control in which a ligand-receptor system generates opposing effects on mitogenesis by differentially regulating signaling pathways to a common cell cycle target. They also emphasize how a seemingly subtle change in matrix composition can have a profound effect on cell proliferation.