Genomic imprinting of chromatin inDrosophila melanogaster

During gametogenesis, chromosomes may become imprinted with information which facilitates proper expression of the DNA in offspring. We have used a position effect variegation mutant as a reporter system to investigate the possibility of imprinting inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetic crosses were performed in which the variegating gene and a strong modifier of variegation were present either within the same parental genome or in opposite parental genomes in all possible combinations. Our results indicate that the presence of the variegating chromosome and a modifier chromosome in the same parental genome can alter the amount of variegation formed in progeny. The genomic imprinting we observed is not determined by the parental origin of the variegating chromosome but is instead determined by the genetic background the variegating chromosome is subjected to during gametogenesis.     

Modulation of Heterochromatin by Male Specific Lethal Proteins and roX RNA in Drosophila melanogaster Males

The ribonucleoprotein Male Specific Lethal (MSL) complex is required for X chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster males. Beginning at 3 h of development the MSL complex binds transcribed X-linked genes and modifies chromatin. A subset of MSL complex proteins, including MSL1 and MSL3, is also necessary for full expression of autosomal heterochromatic genes in males, but not females. Loss of the non-coding roX RNAs, essential components of the MSL complex, lowers the expression of heterochromatic genes and suppresses position effect variegation (PEV) only in males, revealing a sex-limited disruption of heterochromatin. To explore the molecular basis of this observation we examined additional proteins that participate in compensation and found that MLE, but not Jil-1 kinase, contributes to heterochromatic gene expression. To determine if identical regions of roX RNA are required for dosage compensation and heterochromatic silencing, we tested a panel of roX1 transgenes and deletions and find that the X chromosome and heterochromatin functions are separable by some mutations. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of staged embryos revealed widespread autosomal binding of MSL3 before and after localization of the MSL complex to the X chromosome at 3 h AEL. Autosomal MSL3 binding was dependent on MSL1, supporting the idea that a subset of MSL proteins associates with chromatin throughout the genome during early development. The broad localization of these proteins early in embryogenesis supports the idea of direct action at autosomal sites. We postulate that this may contribute to the sex-specific differences in heterochromatin that we, and others, have noted.     

Position Effects and Variegation Enhancers in an Autosomal Region of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

A dominant eye color mutation was found associated with a third chromosome inversion broken distally at or near the karmoisin (kar) locus in 87C and proximally within centric heterochromatin. Suppressibility of the mutant phenotype by an extra Y chromosome indicated that this was an example of dominant position-effect variegation. When heterozygous with deficiencies uncovering the kar locus, this inversion chromosome was found to be lethal unless a region in 87EF was also deleted. Extra Y chromosomes rescued inversion/deletion heterozygotes, while removal of the Y chromosome from heterozygous males deficient for the region in 87EF was lethal. Thus, a variegating lethal lies near the breakpoint in 87C, and a wild-type gene that enhances its variegation lies in 87EF. Furthermore, deletion of the region in 87EF was found to strongly suppress white-mottled-4 (w^m4) variegation, while deletion of another region in 87BC suppressed less strongly. These results indicate that essential genes on autosomes are sensitive to position effects, and loci that enhance variegation, as defined by deficiency mapping, are very common.     

Competition between Different Variegating Rearrangements for Limited Heterochromatic Factors in Drosophila Melanogaster

Position effect variegation (PEV) results from the juxtaposition of a euchromatic gene to heterochromatin. In its new position the gene is inactivated in some cells and not in others. This mosaic expression is consistent with variability in the spread of heterochromatin from cell to cell. As many components of heterochromatin are likely to be produced in limited amounts, the spread of heterochromatin into a normally euchromatic region should be accompanied by a concomitant loss or redistribution of the protein components from other heterochromatic regions. We have shown that this is the case by simultaneously monitoring variegation of a euchromatic and a heterochromatic gene associated with a single chromosome rearrangement. Secondly, if several heterochromatic regions of the genome share limited components of heterochromatin, then some variegating rearrangements should compete for these components. We have examined this hypothesis by testing flies with combinations of two or more different variegating rearrangements. Of the nine combinations of pairs of variegating rearrangements we studied, seven showed nonreciprocal interactions. These results imply that many components of heterochromatin are both shared and present in limited amounts and that they can transfer between chromosomal sites. Consequently, even nonvariegation portions of the genome will be disrupted by re-allocation of heterochromatic proteins associated with PEV. These results have implications for models of PEV.     

Cell-by-cell dissection of gene expression and chromosomal interactions reveals consequences of nuclear reorganization

The functional consequences of long-range nuclear reorganization were studied in a cell-by-cell analysis of gene expression and long-range chromosomal interactions in the Drosophila eye and eye imaginal disk. Position-effect variegation was used to stochastically perturb gene expression and probe nuclear reorganization. Variegating genes on rearrangements of Chromosomes X, 2, and 3 were probed for long-range interactions with heterochromatin. Studies were conducted only in tissues known to express the variegating genes. Nuclear structure was revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes to the variegating gene and heterochromatin. Gene expression was determined alternately by immunofluorescence against specific proteins and by eye pigment autofluorescence. This allowed cell-by-cell comparisons of nuclear architecture between cells in which the variegating gene was either expressed or silenced. Very strong correlations between heterochromatic association and silencing were found. Expressing cells showed a broad distribution of distances between variegating genes and their own centromeric heterochromatin, while silenced cells showed a very tight distribution centered around very short distances, consistent with interaction between the silenced genes and heterochromatin. Spatial and temporal analysis of interactions with heterochromatin indicated that variegating genes primarily associate with heterochromatin in cells that have exited the cell cycle. Differentiation was not a requirement for association, and no differences in association were observed between cell types. Thus, long-range interactions between distal chromosome regions and their own heterochromatin have functional consequences for the organism.     

Chromosomal structure is altered by mutations that suppress or enhance position effect variegation

We examined the genetic, morphological, and molecular effects of position effect variegation inDrosophila, and the effects of mutations that either suppress [Su(var)] or enhance [E(var)] this phenomenon. All eightSu(var) mutations examined strongly suppress the inactivation of variegating alleles of the genes white [In(l) w ^m4 ], brown [In (2R)bw ^VDe2 ] and Stubble [T(2;3)Sb ^V ]. TheE(var) mutation enhances variegation of these loci. The chromosomal region 3C-E (26 bands) which includes the white locus is usually packaged as heterochromatin in salivary glands of the variegating strainw ^m4 . Addition of any of theSu(var) mutations restores a more euchromatic morphology to this region. In situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes and DNA blot analyses of gene copy number demonstrate that the DNA of thew ⁺ gene is less accessible to its probe in the variegatingw ^m4 strain than it is in the wildtype or variegation-suppressed strains. Blot analysis of larval salivary gland DNA indicates that the white gene copy number does not vary among the strains. Hence, the differences in binding of thew ⁺ gene probe in the variegating and variegation-suppressed strains reflect differences in chromosomal packaging rather than alterations in gene number. The effects of variegation and theSu(var) mutations on chromatin structure were analyzed further by DNAse I digestion and DNA blot hybridization. In contrast to their dramatic effects on chromosomal morphology and gene expression, theSu(var) mutations had negligible effects on nuclease sensitivity of the white gene chromatin. We suggest that the changes in gene expression resulting from position effect variegation and the action of theSu(var) mutations involve alterations in chromosomal packaging.     

Influence of deficiency of the histone gene-containing 38B-40 region on X-chromosome template activity and the white gene position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Summary The deficiency of the 38B-40 region containing histone genes in one of the 2nd chromosomes of D. melanogaster triploid intersexes increases the template activity of X-chromosomes both in vivo and in vitro without noticeably affecting autosome activity. This deficiency in the heterozygous state inhibits the variegated position effect of the white gene in the T(1;3)w ^vcotranslocation in diploid females and males, but not affect their rate of development. The variegation suppressor Su(var)hg-1 not only suppress the gene position effect in diploid flies, but also increases the template activity of X-chromosomes in triploid intersexes.The results are discussed with respect to the dependence of gene activity on the structure of chromosomes (density of DNP packing).     

Congenital heart defects and 22q11 deletions: which genes count?

Hemizygous deletions on the long arm of chromosome 22 (del22q11) are a relatively common cause of congenital heart disease. For some specific heart defects such as interrupted aortic arch type B and tetralogy of Fallot with absent pulmonary valve, del22q11 is probably the most frequent genetic cause. Although extensive gene searches have been successful in discovering many novel genes in the deleted segment, standard positional cloning has so far failed to demonstrate a role for any of these genes in the disease. We show how the use of experimental animal models is beginning to provide an insight into the developmental role of some of these genes, while novel genome manipulation technologies promise to dissect the genetic aspects of this complex syndrome.     

Mutants affecting position-effect heterochromatinization in Drosophila melanogaster

The dominant suppressor Su(var)b ¹⁰¹ and the dominant enhancer En(var)c ¹⁰¹ were found to affect significantly white variegation in a strongly variegating line of the w ^m4 chromosome (w ^m4h ) which has been used as standard rearrangement for a genetic dissection of position-effect variegation (Reuter and Wolff, 1981). Both mutations were also shown to affect position-effect heterochromatisation in T(1;4)w ^m258-21 and variegation in all the rearrangements tested (white, brown, scute and bobbed variegation). These results suggest that the genes identified encode functions essential for the manifestation of gene inactivation in position-effect rearrangements. It seems also reasonable to assume that in all the rearrangements tested identical heterochromatisation processes lead to inactivation of the genes whose phenotype is variegated.     

Genetically directed preferential X-activation seen in mice

The nature of the O^hv mutation of the X chromosome of the mouse is defined. This locus exerts a cis position effect upon the expression of genes Tfm and Blo mapping in the same region; genes on the same chromosome as the O^hv mutation are preferentially activated and genes on the other X chromosome are usually inactive. Following the proportion of Tfm cells in the kidneys of heterozygotes confirms that the variegation seen of the locus Blo in the coat is matched in inner tissues. By introducing the sex reversal gene Sxr into these stocks, a situation can be created in which wildtype kidney cells have a selective advantage over Tfm cells in the embryonic Wolfflan duct and urogenital sinus. In spite of this difference in cell advantages, Blo coat variegation and Tfm Wolffian duct cell preponderance continue to exhibit a good correlation. This excludes the possibility that the variegation depends upon a selective advantage of cells carrying Tfm alleles after random X-inactivation and therefore reinforces the conclusion that the O^hv mutation is directly concerned in the X-activation process. A model is presented in which this locus acts as a receptor site recognized by molecules which activate one X chromosome.     

Towards an understanding of position effect variegation

Most variegating position effects are a consequence of placing a euchromatic gene adjacent to alpha-heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the affected locus is inactivated in some cells, but not others, thereby giving rise to a mosaic tissue of mutant and wild-type cells. A detailed examination of the molecular structure of three variegating white mottled mutations of Drosophila melanogaster, all of which are inversions of the X chromosome, reveals that their euchromatic breakpoints are clustered and located approximately 25 kb downstream of the white promoter and that the heterochromatic sequences to which the white locus is adjoined are transposons. An analysis of three revertants of the wm4 mutation, created by relocating white to another euchromatic site, demonstrates that they also carry some heterochromatically derived sequences with them upon restoration of the wild-type phenotype. This suggests that variegation is not controlled from a heterochromatic sequence immediately adjacent to the variegating gene but rather from some site more internal to the heterochromatic domain itself. As a consequence of this observation we have proposed a boundary model for understanding how heterochromatic domains may be formed. It has been recognized for many years that the phenotype of variegating position effects may be altered by the presence of trans-acting dominant mutations that act to either enhance or suppress variegation. Using P-element mutagenesis, we have induced and examined 12 dominant enhancers of variegation that represent four loci on the second and third chromosomes. Most of these mutations are cytologically visible duplications or deficiencies. They exert their dominant effects through changes in the copy number of wild-type genes and can be divided into two reciprocally acting classes. Class I modifiers are genes that act as enhancers of variegation when duplicated and as suppressors when mutated or deficient. Conversely, class II modifiers are genes that enhance when mutated or deleted and suppress when duplicated. The available data indicate that, in Drosophila, there are 20-30 loci capable of dominantly modifying variegation. Of these, most appear to be of the class I type whereas only two class II modifiers have been identified so far.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Loss of the Histone Pre-mRNA Processing Factor Stem-Loop Binding Protein in Drosophila Causes Genomic Instability and Impaired Cellular Proliferation

Background

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs terminate in a conserved stem-loop structure rather than a polyA tail. Formation of this unique mRNA 3′ end requires Stem-loop Binding Protein (SLBP), which directly binds histone pre-mRNA and stimulates 3′ end processing. The 3′ end stem-loop is necessary for all aspects of histone mRNA metabolism, including replication coupling, but its importance to organism fitness and genome maintenance in vivo have not been characterized.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In Drosophila, disruption of the Slbp gene prevents normal histone pre-mRNA processing and causes histone pre-mRNAs to utilize the canonical 3′ end processing pathway, resulting in polyadenylated histone mRNAs that are no longer properly regulated. Here we show that Slbp mutants display genomic instability, including loss of heterozygosity (LOH), increased presence of chromosome breaks, tetraploidy, and changes in position effect variegation (PEV). During imaginal disc growth, Slbp mutant cells show defects in S phase and proliferate more slowly than control cells.

Conclusions/Significance

These data are consistent with a model in which changing the 3′ end of histone mRNA disrupts normal replication-coupled histone mRNA biosynthesis and alters chromatin assembly, resulting in genomic instability, inhibition of cell proliferation, and impaired development.     

Position effect variegation of an acid phosphatase gene in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary X-ray mutagenesis has produced a series of deficiencies in a duplication of part of the third chromosome containing the acid phosphatase gene (Acph-1) in Drosophila melanogaster. In one of these deficiencies, Acph-1 is shown to be undergoing position effect variegation. Naturally occurring electrophoretic variants of the enzyme were used to visualize and determine quantitatively the extent of variegation of the allele which is cis to the heterochromatic breakpoint. Alteration of genotypic background and temperature provided further evidence for position effect. Rocket immunoelectrophoresis was used to correlate the levels of acid phosphatase activity and protein in flies containing the deficiency. A novel result indicates that the variegation is not the consequence of an averaging of active and inactive cells, but rather due to a quantitative alteration of gene activity within at least some individual cells.     

Position effect variegation in yeast

Classically, position effect variegation has been studied in Drosophila and results when a euchromatic gene is placed adjacent to either centromeric heterochromatin or to a telomeric domain. In such a circumstance expression of the locus variegates, being active in some cells and silent in others. Over the last few years a comparable phenomenon in yeast has been discovered. This system promises to tell us much about this curious behaviour. Indeed, experiments reported recently⁽¹⁾ indicate that the variegation of a yeast telomeric gene is cell-cycle regulated. The results suggest the following model. During DNA replication there is a disassembly of chromatin that allows a competition between silencing factors and trans-activators to take place. Thus, reassembly of the domain may result in either the repression or the expression of the affected gene and, hence, produce a variegating phenotype.