Rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine practice (GERINIS): six-year results from a prospective,multicentre, non-interventional study in 2,484 patients

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care, and to monitor changes in daily practice since the introduction of RTX therapy.

Methods

This was a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study conducted under routine practice conditions in Germany. Efficacy was evaluated using Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety was assessed by recording adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Physician and patient global efficacy and tolerability assessments were also evaluated.

Results

Overall, 2,484 patients (76.7% female, mean age 56.4 years, mean disease duration 11.7 years) received RTX treatment (22.7% monotherapy). The total observation period was approximately six-years (median follow-up 14.7 months). RTX treatment led to improvements in DAS28 and HAQ-DI that were sustained over multiple courses. DAS28 improvements positively correlated with higher rheumatoid factor levels up to 50 IU/ml. Response and tolerability were rated good/very good by the majority of physicians and patients. Mean treatment intervals were 10.5 and 6.8 months for the first and last 400 enrolled patients, respectively. Infections were the most frequently reported ADRs (9.1%; 11.39/100 patient-years); approximately 1% of patients per course discontinued therapy due to ADRs.

Conclusions

Prolonged RTX treatment in routine care is associated with good efficacy and tolerability, as measured by conventional parameters and by physicians’ and patients’ global assessments. Rheumatoid factor status served as a distinct and quantitative biomarker of RTX responsiveness. With growing experience, physicians repeated treatments earlier in patients with less severe disease activity.     

Does psychological status influence clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other chronic gastroenterological diseases: An observational cohort prospective study

Background

Whether there is a temporal relationship between psychological problems and clinical outcomes in patients with diseases of the digestive tract has not been widely researched. Thus, our aims were 1) To observe and compare prospectively clinical outcomes in relation to psychological co-morbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and, 2) To test the hypothesis that patients with psychological co-morbidities are less likely to have a satisfactory response to standard treatment at 12 months.

Methods

Overall, 139 patients were enrolled in this observational cohort prospective study. Over the ensuing year, physical and psychological measures were made at baseline and after 12 months (HADS, SCL90, SF-12 and disease activity measures). A logistic regression was conducted to observe any relationship between baseline characteristics and patients' clinical outcomes after 12 months.

Results

Overall, there was no relationship between psychological status and quality of life at baseline and relapse at 12 months (p > 0.05). However, patients with inactive disease at baseline were at lower risk of relapse after 12 months (OR = 0.046, CI: 0.012–0.178). No significant relationship was found between psychological problems such as depression/anxiety and a total number of relapses in the IBD group. However, interestingly, patients with an active disease at baseline tended to have a greater number of relapses (OR = 3.07, CI: 1.650–5.738) and CD participants were found at lower risk of relapse than UC participants (OR = 0.382, CI: 0.198–0.736).

Conclusion

In contrast to previous investigations, this study suggests that there is no temporal relationship between psychological problems at baseline and clinical outcomes over time. Longer and larger prospective studies are needed to better understand this result.     

Ipilimumab in pretreated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: safety and clinical efficacy

Current systemic treatments for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) have not improved overall survival (OS). The fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, ipilimumab, improved OS of patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma in a phase 3 trial; however, UM patients were excluded. The aim of this subanalysis, performed by the ipilimumab-ocular melanoma expanded access program (I-OMEAP) study group, was to assess the activity and safety of ipilimumab in patients with UM in a setting similar to daily clinical practice. Patients participating in a multicenter expanded access program (EAP) received induction treatment with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. Maintenance doses were administered in patients who experienced clinical benefit or at physicians' discretion. Tumor assessment was evaluated per modified World Health Organization criteria at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36. Adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs) were collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Thirteen pretreated patients with metastatic UM were treated at 6 European institutions. All patients received at least one dose of ipilimumab. Overall, no objective responses were observed; however, two patients had stable disease (SD), with a third patient achieving SD after initial progressive disease. Median OS as of July 1, 2011, was 36 weeks (range 2-172+?weeks). No grade 3/4 AEs of non-immune origin were reported. Three patients (23%) experienced grade 3 irAEs (1 thrombocytopenia, 1 diarrhea, and 1 alanine/aspartate aminotransferase elevation) that resolved with steroid therapy. The results indicate UM is a potential indication for ipilimumab treatment that should be further investigated in clinical trials.     

Skin-impedance in Fabry Disease: A prospective,controlled, non-randomized clinical study

Background

We previously demonstrated improved sweating after enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Fabry disease using the thermo-regularity sweat and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex tests. Skin-impedance, a measure skin-moisture (sweating), has been used in the clinical evaluation of burns and pressure ulcers using the portable dynamic dermal impedance monitor (DDIM) system.

Methods

We compared skin impedance measurements in hemizygous patients with Fabry disease (22 post 3-years of bi-weekly ERT and 5 ERT naive) and 22 healthy controls. Force compensated skin-moisture values were used for statistical analysis. Outcome measures included 1) moisture reading of the 100^th repetitive reading, 2) rate of change, 3) average of 60–110^th reading and 4) overall average of all readings.

Results

All outcome measures showed a significant difference in skin-moisture between Fabry patients and control subjects (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between Fabry patients on ERT and patients naïve to ERT. Increased skin-impedance values for the four skin-impedance outcome measures were found in a small number of dermatome test-sites two days post-enzyme infusions.

Conclusion

The instrument portability, ease of its use, a relatively short time required for the assessment, and the fact that DDIM system was able to detect the difference in skin-moisture renders the instrument a useful clinical tool.

     

The TETRA study: a prospective evaluation of Helicobacter pylori 'test-and-treat' strategy on 736 patients in clinical practice

AIMS: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the test-and-treat strategy in a large group of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, < 45 years, without alarm symptoms, were prospectively studied. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with the 13C-urea-breath-test, and eradication or symptomatic treatment was prescribed accordingly. 'Symptomatic improvement' was defined as the percentage of patients with a decrease of > or = 2 levels in the dyspepsia-severity-score or with no symptoms after treatment. Health status and use of health resources were also assessed. Endoscopy was performed in therapeutic failures. RESULTS: Out of 736 patients initially included, 422 received eradication, and 314 symptomatic therapy; 87% returned at 6 weeks and 67% at 6 months. At 6 months, 'symptomatic improvement' was achieved in 73% and 54% of the patients, in eradication and symptomatic groups, respectively (p < .001), and overall in 66%. A reduction of 78% in mean self-assessment visual analogical score was observed at 6 months. More than 50% of patients were 'much better' at control visits. Endoscopy (18%) and physician's visits (13%) were the main health resources used. No gastric or oesophageal cancer was diagnosed. CONCLUSION: This large prospective study shows that the test-and-treat strategy is effective and safe for management of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.     

The use, safety, and effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccination in individuals with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases: a longitudinal observational study

Introduction

Zostavax, a live attenuated vaccine, has been approved in the United States for use in older individuals to reduce the risk and severity of herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles. The vaccine is contraindicated in individuals taking anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) therapies or other biologics commonly used to treat autoimmune diseases because of the safety concern that zoster vaccine may be associated with a short-term HZ risk. The objective of the study was to examine the use, safety (short-term HZ risk after vaccination), and effectiveness of zoster vaccine in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and/or inflammatory bowel diseases.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study of patients aged 50 years and older with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and/or inflammatory bowel diseases by using administrative claims data from a nationwide health plan from January 1, 2005, to August 31, 2009. We examined the extent to which zoster vaccine was used; assessed factors associated with vaccine use (Cox proportional hazards regression); and compared the incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ) between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.

Results

Among 44,115 patients with the autoimmune diseases, 551 (1.2%) received zoster vaccine, and 761 developed HZ. Zoster vaccine use increased continuously after approval in 2006. Younger and healthier patients, those who had an HZ infection within the past 6 months, and those who were not using anti-TNF therapies were more likely to receive the vaccine. Approximately 6% of vaccinated patients were using anti-TNF therapies at the time of vaccination. The incidence rates of HZ were similar in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients (standardized incidence ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 3.43).

Conclusions

Use of the zoster vaccine was uncommon among older patients with autoimmune diseases, including those not exposed to immunosuppressive medications. The short-term risk of HZ did not appear to be increased in vaccinated patients, even among those using immunosuppressive therapies (for example, biologics) at the time of vaccination. However, our study was limited by the small number of vaccinated patients, and further evidence is needed to confirm the vaccine's safety and efficacy in this population.     

Clinical safety and efficacy of NG440: a novel combination of rho iso-alpha acids from hops, rosemary, and oleanolic acid for inflammatory conditions

In this report, we examine the clinical safety and efficacy of NG440, a phytochemical-based antiinflammatory formula consisting of a combination of rho iso-alpha acids from hops, rosemary, and oleanolic acid. In a previous study, we demonstrated that NG440 significantly decreased pain by 50% in patients with osteoarthritis. Consistent with these data, results from a multicentre trial indicate that NG440 reduced pain scores in patients with joint discomfort, as measured by VAS (visual analog scale) methodology. As demonstrated in an ex vivo clinical study, these effects on pain relief may be due to reduced inflammatory cytokine production including lower prostaglandin E2 formation. Finally, strong data exist to suggest that NG440 is a safe formula for human consumption. Animal toxicity data revealed no adverse effects of NG440 at dosages < or =250 mg.kg-1.day-1 for 21 days. Furthermore, human trial data suggest that NG440 does not negatively impact cardiovascular and gastrointestinal markers normally affected by selective COX-2 enzyme inhibitors, including platelet function, blood pressure, blood cell count, or fecal calprotectin, a measure of gastrointestinal injury. In conclusion, NG440 may serve as a safe and efficacious alternative in some areas where specific COX-2 inhibitors have been traditionally used.     

Double-blind,placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for patients with glabellar lines

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar lines. Patients with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximal frown received intramuscular injections of placebo or 20 U of botulinum toxin type A (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) distributed among five injection sites (one in the procerus muscle and two in each corrugator supercilii). Follow-up assessments were performed at 7, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after injections. Efficacy measures were the physician's rating of glabellar line severity at maximal frown and at rest (none, mild, moderate, or severe) and the patient's global assessment of changes in glabellar lines, from +4 (100 percent better) to -4 (100 percent worse). A total of 273 patients were enrolled (botulinum toxin, 202 patients; placebo, 71 patients). All except five patients (botulinum toxin, two patients; placebo, three patients) completed the study. For the physician's rating at maximal frown, the responder rate (percentage of patients with severity ratings of none or mild in follow-up evaluations) for the botulinum toxin group peaked at 77 percent at day 30 and was significantly greater than that for the placebo group at every follow-up visit (p < 0.001). For the patient's assessment, the responder rate (percentage of patients with scores of +2 or more) for the botulinum toxin group peaked at 89 percent at day 30 and was significantly greater than that for the placebo group at every follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Rates of adverse events were similar for the two groups. The only adverse event with an incidence of >/=5 percent was headache (botulinum toxin, 11 percent; placebo, 20 percent). The incidence of blepharoptosis was 1 percent for the botulinum toxin group. Botulinum toxin type A was remarkably safe and effective in reducing glabellar lines.     

Human insulin: study of safety and efficacy in man.

The safety and efficacy of a new highly purified neutral soluble human insulin produced by conversion of porcine insulin was compared with a highly purified neutral soluble porcine insulin in six normal men. The insulins were administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 0.075 U/kg body weight. Somatostatin was infused during the experiment to suppress endogenous insulin secretin. No difference was found in the plasma glucose, insulin, or metabolite responses. Thus the potency, onset, and duration of effect were identical with the two insulins. No short-term side effects to either insulin were observed. Highly purified, semi-synthetic human insulin offers a safe and effective means to explore the possible advantages of homologous human insulin in the management of diabetes mellitus.     

Hypericum extract versus imipramine or placebo in patients with moderate depression: randomised multicentre study of treatment for eight weeks

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of hypericum extract (STEI 300, Steiner Arzneimittel, Berlin) compared with imipramine and placebo in patients in primary care with a current episode of moderate depression.DesignRandomised, double blind, multicentre, parallel group trial for 8 weeks.SettingTrained panel of 18 general practitioners from four German states: Bavaria, Berlin, Rhineland Palatinate, and Saxony.Participants263 patients (66 men, 197 women) with moderate depression according to ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th revision) codes F32.1 and F33.1.Interventions1050 mg hypericum extract (350 mg three times daily), 100 mg imipramine (50 mg, 25 mg, and 25 mg daily), or placebo three times daily.ResultsHypericum extract was more effective at reducing Hamilton depression scores than placebo and as effective as imipramine (mean −15.4 (SD 8.1), −12.1 (7.4), and –14.2 (7.3) respectively). Comparable results were found for Hamilton anxiety and clinical global impressions scales and were most pronounced for the Zung self rating depression scale. Quality of life was more improved in the standardised mental component scale of the SF-36 with both active treatments than with placebo but in the physical component scale was improved only by hypericum extract compared with placebo. The rate of adverse events with hypericum extract was in the range of the placebo group but lower than that of the imipramine group (0.5, 0.6, and 1.2 events per patient respectively).ConclusionsAt an average dose of 350 mg three times daily hypericum extract was more effective than placebo and at least as effective as 100 mg imipramine daily in the treatment of moderate depression. Treatment with hypericum extract is safe and improves quality of life.

Key messages

• Hypericum extract (STEI 300) was effective after 4, 6, and 8 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate depression
• Simultaneous analysis confirmed hypericum extract to be at least as efficacious as imipramine 100 mg daily after eight weeks of treatment
• Besides better antidepressive efficacy both hypericum extract and imipramine improved quality of life
• Patients tolerate hypericum extracts much better than they do tricyclics and therefore by improving patients'' compliance hypericum extracts are promising drugs for long term treatment

     

老年矽肺患者并发呼吸道感染危险因素的前瞻性临床研究

目的探讨老年矽肺患者发生呼吸道感染的危险因素。方法以2009年3月至2010年9月在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院呼吸科门诊随访、病情稳定的老年矽肺患者为研究对象。记录入选时的一般情况、病史和血液生化指标,随访1年,记录随访期间是否发生呼吸道感染及发生的时间。根据随访期间是否发生呼吸道感染。分为矽肺伴感染组和矽肺不伴感染组,比较两组上述指标的差异,并进行多元回归分析,探讨老年矽肺患者发生呼吸道感染的危险因素。结果（1）矽肺伴感染组糖尿病患者所占比例显著高于矽肺不伴感染组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;矽肺伴感染组白蛋白和CD4^＋／CD8^＋显著低于矽肺不伴感染组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;两组在高血压史、吸烟史、血肌酐、血红蛋白、白细胞、中性粒细胞百分率和CD3^-CD19^＋等方面比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。（2）多元回归分析显示,有糖尿病史,1年内发生呼吸道感染的概率增加48．2％;白蛋白和CD4^＋／CD8^＋每降低一单位,老年矽肺患者1年内发生呼吸道感染的概率分别增加51．5％和160．5％。结论糖尿病、低蛋白血症和低CD4^＋／CD8^＋比值是老年矽肺患者发生呼吸道感染的独立危险因素。     

Metabolic efficacy and safety of once-daily pioglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Pioglitazone is a novel oral anti-diabetic agent belonging to the thiazolidinedione class. Pioglitazone has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, as it reduces insulin resistance and improves glycaemic control and abnormal lipid profiles. This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study was conducted for further evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily administration of pioglitazone monotherapy alongside dietary measures in patients with type 2 diabetes. Following a 10-week washout period, 251 patients received one of three treatment regimens for 26 weeks: placebo + diet (n = 84), pioglitazone 15 mg once-daily + diet (n = 89), or pioglitazone 30 mg once-daily + diet (n = 78). Pioglitazone, both 15 and 30 mg/day, in addition to dietary control, was associated with significant reductions (vs. placebo) in mean levels of both glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1C ) and fasting blood glucose (FBG). HbA 1C was reduced by 0.92 % and 1.05 %, respectively, and FBG was reduced by 34.3 and 36.0 mg/dl, respectively, compared with the control group. Pioglitazone at 15 and 30 mg/day significantly reduced postprandial blood glucose levels at all visits (- 163 and - 165 mg/dl/hour, respectively) compared with an increase of 47.7 mg/dl/hour on placebo. The profile and frequency of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups. These results indicate that pioglitazone monotherapy together with dietary control is both effective and safe in patients with type 2 diabetes.