A root chicory MADS box sequence and the Arabidopsis flowering repressor FLC share common features that suggest conserved function in vernalization and de‐vernalization responses

Root chicory (Cichorium intybus var. sativum) is a biennial crop, but is harvested to obtain root inulin at the end of the first growing season before flowering. However, cold temperatures may vernalize seeds or plantlets, leading to incidental early flowering, and hence understanding the molecular basis of vernalization is important. A MADS box sequence was isolated by RT‐PCR and named FLC‐LIKE1 (CiFL1) because of its phylogenetic positioning within the same clade as the floral repressor Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C (AtFLC). Moreover, over‐expression of CiFL1 in Arabidopsis caused late flowering and prevented up‐regulation of the AtFLC target FLOWERING LOCUS T by photoperiod, suggesting functional conservation between root chicory and Arabidopsis. Like AtFLC in Arabidopsis, CiFL1 was repressed during vernalization of seeds or plantlets of chicory, but repression of CiFL1 was unstable when the post‐vernalization temperature was favorable to flowering and when it de‐vernalized the plants. This instability of CiFL1 repression may be linked to the bienniality of root chicory compared with the annual lifecycle of Arabidopsis. However, re‐activation of AtFLC was also observed in Arabidopsis when a high temperature treatment was used straight after seed vernalization, eliminating the promotive effect of cold on flowering. Cold‐induced down‐regulation of a MADS box floral repressor and its re‐activation by high temperature thus appear to be conserved features of the vernalization and de‐vernalization responses in distant species.     

Minimal regions in the Arabidopsis PISTILLATA promoter responsive to the APETALA3/PISTILLATA feedback control do not contain a CArG box

PISTILLATA (PI) is a floral homeotic B function gene in Arabidopsis and together with the other B function gene, APETALA3 (AP3), is involved in specifying petal and stamen identities. The expression of PI and AP3 is under similar developmental control. The initiation of AP3 and PI expression is at least partly caused by the floral meristem identity gene LEAFY, but the maintenance of AP3 and PI expression involves an autoregulatory loop requiring the activity of both genes. PI and AP3 are MADS domain proteins that form, and appear to function as, a heterodimer. AP3/PI binds in vitro to a sequence motif, CC(A/T)₆GG, a MADS domain protein consensus binding site also known as the CArG box. We identified a 481-bp PI promoter region that confers both the initiation and the maintenance of PI expression patterns. We further dissected the promoter and identified minimal regions responsible for the AP3/PI-dependent expression. No CArG box is present in these minimal regions, suggesting that either AP3/PI does not bind directly to the PI promoter for the maintenance control, or that it requires additional factors to bind to the PI promoter. Our results suggest that the mechanisms of regulation of the two B function genes, AP3 and PI, are different, because CArG boxes are present in the AP3 promoter and are necessary for the AP3 feedback control. Received: 1 March 2000 / Revision accepted: 15 June 2000     

A Förster resonance energy transfer sensor for live‐cell imaging of mitogen‐activated protein kinase activity in Arabidopsis

The catalytic activity of mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPKs) is dynamically modified in plants. Since MAPKs have been shown to play important roles in a wide range of signaling pathways, the ability to monitor MAPK activity in living plant cells would be valuable. Here, we report the development of a genetically encoded MAPK activity sensor for use in Arabidopsis thaliana. The sensor is composed of yellow and blue fluorescent proteins, a phosphopeptide binding domain, a MAPK substrate domain and a flexible linker. Using in vitro testing, we demonstrated that phosphorylation causes an increase in the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiency of the sensor. The FRET efficiency can therefore serve as a readout of kinase activity. We also produced transgenic Arabidopsis lines expressing this sensor of MAPK activity (SOMA) and performed live‐cell imaging experiments using detached cotyledons. Treatment with NaCl, the synthetic flagellin peptide flg22 and chitin all led to rapid gains in FRET efficiency. Control lines expressing a version of SOMA in which the phosphosite was mutated to an alanine did not show any substantial changes in FRET. We also expressed the sensor in a conditional loss‐of‐function double‐mutant line for the Arabidopsis MAPK genes MPK3 and MPK6. These experiments demonstrated that MPK3/6 are necessary for the NaCl‐induced FRET gain of the sensor, while other MAPKs are probably contributing to the chitin and flg22‐induced increases in FRET. Taken together, our results suggest that SOMA is able to dynamically report MAPK activity in living plant cells.     

Base coupling in sequence-specific site recognition by the ETS domain of murine PU.1

The ETS domain of murine PU.1 tolerates a large number of DNA cognates bearing a central consensus 5'-GGAA-3' that is flanked by a diverse combination of bases on both sides. Previous attempts to define the sequence selectivity of this DNA binding domain by combinatorial methods have not successfully predicted observed patterns among in vivo promoter sequences in the genome, and have led to the hypothesis that energetic coupling occurs among the bases in the flanking sequences. To test this hypothesis, we determined, using thermodynamic cycles, the complex stabilities and base coupling energies of the PU.1 ETS domain for a set of 26 cognate variants (based on the lambdaB site of the Ig(lambda)2-4 enhancer, 5'-AATAAAAGGAAGTGAAACCAA-3') in which flanking sequences up to three bases upstream and/or two bases downstream of the core consensus are substituted. We observed that both cooperative and anticooperative coupling occurs commonly among the flanking sequences at all the positions investigated. This phenomenon extends at least three bases in the 5' side and is, at least on our experimental data, due exclusively to pairwise interactions between the flanking bases, and not changes in the local environment of the DNA groove floor. Energetic coupling also occurs between the flanking sides across the core consensus, suggesting long-range conformational effects along the DNA target and/or in the protein. Our data provide an energetic explanation for the pattern of flanking bases observed among in vivo promoter sequences and reconcile the apparent discrepancies raised by the combinatorial experiments. We also discuss the significance of base coupling in light of an indirect readout mechanism in ETS/DNA site recognition.