A HuD‐ZBP1 ribonucleoprotein complex localizes GAP‐43 mRNA into axons through its 3′ untranslated region AU‐rich regulatory element

Localized translation of axonal mRNAs contributes to developmental and regenerative axon growth. Although untranslated regions (UTRs) of many different axonal mRNAs appear to drive their localization, there has been no consensus RNA structure responsible for this localization. We recently showed that limited expression of ZBP1 protein restricts axonal localization of both β‐actin and GAP‐43 mRNAs. β‐actin 3′UTR has a defined element for interaction with ZBP1, but GAP‐43 mRNA shows no homology to this RNA sequence. Here, we show that an AU‐rich regulatory element (ARE) in GAP‐43′s 3′UTR is necessary and sufficient for its axonal localization. Axonal GAP‐43 mRNA levels increase after in vivo injury, and GAP‐43 mRNA shows an increased half‐life in regenerating axons. GAP‐43 mRNA interacts with both HuD and ZBP1, and HuD and ZBP1 co‐immunoprecipitate in an RNA‐dependent fashion. Reporter mRNA with the GAP‐43 ARE competes with endogenous β‐actin mRNA for axonal localization and decreases axon length and branching similar to the β‐actin 3′UTR competing with endogenous GAP‐43 mRNA. Conversely, over‐expressing GAP‐43 coding sequence with its 3′UTR ARE increases axonal elongation and this effect is lost when just the ARE is deleted from GAP‐43′s 3′UTR.

     

Simultaneous transport of different localized mRNA species revealed by live-cell imaging

Intracellular mRNA localization is a common mechanism to achieve asymmetric distributions of proteins. Previous studies have revealed that in a number of cell types, different mRNA species are localized by the same transport machinery. However, it has been unclear if these individual mRNA species are specifically sorted into separate or common ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles before or during transport. Using budding yeast as a model system, we analyzed the intracellular movement of individual pairs of localized mRNA in live cells. Yeast cells localize more than 20 different mRNAs to the bud with the help of the Myo4p/She3p/She2p protein complex. For live cell imaging, mRNA pairs were tagged with tandem repeats of either bacteriophage MS2 or lambda boxB RNA sequences and fluorescently labeled by fusion protein constructs that bind to the RNA tag sequences. Using three-dimensional, single-particle tracking with dual-color detection, we have tracked the transport of two different localized mRNA species in real time. Our observations show that different localized mRNAs are coassembled into common RNP particles and cotransported in a directional manner to the target site. Nonlocalized mRNAs or mutant mRNAs that lack functional localization signals form separate particles that are not transported to the bud. This study reveals a high degree of co-ordination of mRNA trafficking in budding yeast.     

Recruitment of 7SL RNA to assembling HIV‐1 virus‐like particles

Retroviruses incorporate specific host cell RNAs into virions. In particular, the host noncoding 7SL RNA is highly abundant in all examined retroviruses compared with its cellular levels or relative to common mRNAs such as actin. Using live cell imaging techniques, we have determined that the 7SL RNA does not arrive with the HIV‐1 RNA genome. Instead, it is recruited contemporaneously with assembly of the protein HIV‐1 Gag at the plasma membrane. Further, we demonstrate that complexes of 7SL RNA and Gag can be immunoprecipitated from both cytosolic and plasma membrane fractions. This indicates that 7SL RNAs likely interact with Gag prior to high‐order Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane. Thus, the interactions between Gag and the host RNA 7SL occur independent of the interactions between Gag and the host endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) proteins, which are recruited temporarily at late stages of assembly. The interactions of 7SL and Gag are also independent of interactions of Gag and the HIV‐1 genome which are seen on the plasma membrane prior to assembly of Gag.      

Why cells move messages: the biological functions of mRNA localization

RNA localization is a widespread mechanism that allows cells to spatially control protein function by determining their sites of synthesis. In embryos, localized mRNAs are involved in morphogen gradient formation or the asymmetric distribution of cell fate determinants. In somatic cell types, mRNA localization contributes to local assembly of protein complexes or facilitates protein targeting to organelles. Long-distance transport of specific mRNAs in plants allows coordination of developmental processes between different plant organs. In this review, we will discuss the biological significance of different patterns of mRNA localization.     

Neuronal ribonucleoprotein granules: Dynamic sensors of localized signals

Membrane‐less organelles, because of their capacity to dynamically, selectively and reversibly concentrate molecules, are very well adapted for local information processing and rapid response to environmental fluctuations. These features are particularly important in the context of neuronal cells, where synapse‐specific activation, or localized extracellular cues, induce signaling events restricted to specialized axonal or dendritic subcompartments. Neuronal ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles, or granules, are nonmembrane bound macromolecular condensates that concentrate specific sets of mRNAs and regulatory proteins, promoting their long‐distance transport to axons or dendrites. Neuronal RNP granules also have a dual function in regulating the translation of associated mRNAs: while preventing mRNA translation at rest, they fuel local protein synthesis upon activation. As revealed by recent work, rapid and reversible switches between these two functional modes are triggered by modifications of the networks of interactions underlying RNP granule assembly. Such flexible properties also come with a cost, as neuronal RNP granules are prone to transition into pathological aggregates in response to mutations, aging, or cellular stresses, further emphasizing the need to better understand the mechanistic principles governing their dynamic assembly and regulation in living systems.     

Whole‐mount in situ hybridization of mouse brain to precisely locate mRNAs via fluorescence tomography

Nucleic acids of intact biological tissues are rich in biological information. Whole‐mount in situ hybridization is a powerful technique to mine the wealth of data contained in DNAs or RNAs, especially mRNAs. However, there are no simple, rapid approaches to precisely locate mRNAs in whole‐mount tissues such as intact brains. By combining the penetration procedures of iDISCO with the signal amplification approach termed hybridization chain reaction, we herein developed a method for whole‐brain in situ hybridization at cellular resolution. Based on fluorescence tomography instead of tissue clearing, this method provides a simple, rapid way to precisely locate mRNAs in the whole brain with cytoarchitectonic landmarks. As a proof of principle, we investigated the exact distribution of Cre mRNA in a Thy1‐Cre mouse brain. We found high levels of Cre mRNA in most regions of the subcortical nuclei and the brain stem but comparatively low levels in major areas of the cerebral cortex. This method may have broad applications in studies of RNA function and its relations with diseases.      

Stage-specific expression of rat transition protein 2 mRNA and possible localization to the chromatoid body of step 7 spermatids by in situ hybridization using a nonradioactive riboprobe.

The present study has used methoxyacetic acid (MAA)-induced depletion of specific germ cell types in the rat and in situ hybridization with nonradioactive riboprobes to determine the stages of the spermatogenic cycle at which there is expression of the mRNA for the basic chromosomal protein transition protein 2 (TP2). On Northern blots, an abundant mRNA was detectable in samples from control adult rats, but the amount of message was markedly reduced when RNA was extracted from the testes of rats treated 14 and 21 days previously with methoxyacetic acid. These testes were depleted specifically of step 7-12 spermatids, suggesting that these cells contain TP2 mRNA. When tissue sections were subjected to in situ hybridization, the TP2 mRNA was localized at the cellular and subcellular levels. Messenger RNA for TP2 was first detectable in spermatids at step 7. In these spermatids, at high magnification, in addition to some positive reaction in the cytoplasm, intense staining was located to a perinuclear structure consistent with localization of mRNA within the chromatoid body. The amount of TP2 mRNA in the cytoplasm increased as remodelling of the early spermatid nucleus progressed and was highest in step 10 and 11 spermatids at stages X and XI. Thereafter, the mRNA decreased until it was undetectable in step 14 spermatids at stage XIV. The localization of TP2 mRNA to the chromatoid body of step 7 spermatids would be consistent with this organelle being a storage site for long-lived mRNAs utilized later in spermiogenesis.     

mRNA Localization: An Orchestration of Assembly,Traffic and Synthesis

Asymmetrical mRNA localization and subsequent local translation provide efficient mechanisms for protein sorting in polarized cells. Defects in mRNA localization have been linked to developmental abnormalities and neurological diseases. Thus, it is critical to understand the machineries mediating and mechanisms underlying the asymmetrical distribution of mRNA and its regulation. The goal of this review is to summarize recent advances in the understanding of mRNA transport and localization, including the assembly and sorting of transport messenger ribonucleic protein (mRNP) granules, molecular mechanisms of active mRNP transport, cytoskeletal interactions and regulation of these events by extracellular signals.      

Imaging mRNA trafficking in living cells using fluorogenic proteins

mRNAs play key roles in regulating diverse cellular functions. In many cases, mRNAs exhibit distinct intracellular localizations that are necessary for the spatiotemporal control of protein expression in cells. Therefore, imaging the localization and dynamics of these mRNAs is crucial for understanding diverse aspects of cellular function. In this review, we summarize how mRNA imaging can be achieved using tethered fluorescent proteins and fluorogenic aptamers. We discuss ‘fluorogenic proteins’ and describe how these recently developed RNA-regulated fluorescent proteins simplify mRNA imaging experiments.     

RNA Granule Protein 140 (RNG140), a Paralog of RNG105 Localized to Distinct RNA Granules in Neuronal Dendrites in the Adult Vertebrate Brain

RNA granules mediate the transport and local translation of their mRNA cargoes, which regulate cellular processes such as stress response and neuronal synaptic plasticity. RNA granules contain specific RNA-binding proteins, including RNA granule protein 105 (RNG105), which is likely to participate in the transport and translation of mRNAs. In the present report, an RNG105 paralog, RNG140 is described. A homolog of RNG105/RNG140 is found in insects, echinoderms, and urochordates, whereas vertebrates have both of the two genes. RNG140 and RNG105 are similar in that both bind to mRNAs and inhibit translation in vitro, induce the formation of RNA granules, are most highly expressed in the brain, and are localized to dendritic RNA granules, part of which are accumulated at postsynapses. However, they differ in several characteristics; RNG105 is highly expressed in embryonic brains, whereas RNG140 is highly expressed in adult brains. Furthermore, the granules where RNG105 or RNG140 is localized are distinct RNA granules in both cultured cells and neuronal dendrites. Thus, RNG140 is an RNA-binding protein that shows different expression and localization patterns from RNG105. Knockdown experiments in cultured neurons also are performed, which demonstrate that suppression of RNG140 or RNG105 reduces dendrite length and spine density. Knockdown effects of RNG140 were not rescued by RNG105, and vise versa, suggesting distinct roles of RNG105 and RNG140. These results suggest that RNG140 has roles in the maintenance of the dendritic structure in the adult vertebrate brain through localizing to a kind of RNA granules that are distinct from RNG105-containing granules.