Competition between functional signal peptides demonstrates variation in affinity for the secretion pathway.

We have developed a system for examining the relative affinity of two different signal peptides for the protein secretion pathway in Escherichia coli. This system involves the expression of a modified alkaline phosphatase which possesses two signal peptides arranged in tandem. When both signal peptides have the wild-type sequence, cleavage after the first and cleavage after the second occur with nearly equal frequency. In both cases the remainder of the protein is transported to the periplasm. Thus both signal peptides effectively compete with each other for entrance to the secretion pathway. When the hydrophobicity of the second signal peptide is altered by small increments, we find that the more hydrophobic signal peptide is preferentially utilized. Thus, a more hydrophobic signal peptide can outcompete even an efficient wild-type signal sequence. The crossover point, for utilization of the second to the first signal peptide, is marked and occurs over a very small change in hydrophobicity. Our results suggest that the small differences in the hydrophobicity of wild-type signal peptides may have critical consequences: preproteins with the more hydrophobic signals could dominate one pathway, leaving those with only slightly less hydrophobic signals to require additional factors such as chaperonins, SecB, and other binding proteins.     

A protein from a parasitic microorganism, Rickettsia prowazekii, can cleave the signal sequences of proteins targeting mitochondria

The obligate intracellular parasitic bacteria rickettsiae are more closely related to mitochondria than any other microbes investigated to date. A rickettsial putative peptidase (RPP) was found to resemble the alpha and beta subunits of mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP), which cleaves the transport signal sequences of mitochondrial preproteins. RPP showed completely conserved zinc-binding and catalytic residues compared with beta-MPP but barely contained any of the glycine-rich loop region characteristic of alpha-MPP. When the biochemical activity of RPP purified from a recombinant source was analyzed, RPP specifically hydrolyzed basic peptides and presequence peptides with frequent cleavage at their MPP-processing sites. Moreover, RPP appeared to activate yeast beta-MPP so that it processed preproteins with shorter presequences. Thus, RPP behaves as a bifunctional protein that could act as a basic peptide peptidase and a somewhat regulatory protein for other protein activities in rickettsiae. These are the first biological and enzymological studies to report that a protein from a parasitic microorganism can cleave the signal sequences of proteins targeted to mitochondria.     

Structural studies of a signal peptide in complex with signal peptidase I cytoplasmic domain: the stabilizing effect of membrane-mimetics on the acquired fold

A protein destined for export from the cell cytoplasm is synthesized as a preprotein with an amino-terminal signal peptide. In Escherichia coli, typically signal peptides that guide preproteins into the SecYEG protein conduction channel are subsequently removed by signal peptidase I. To understand the mechanism of this critical step, we have assessed the conformation of the signal peptide when bound to signal peptidase by solution nuclear magnetic resonance. We employed a soluble form of signal peptidase, which laks the two transmembrane domains (SPase I Δ2-75), and the E. coli alkaline phosphatase signal peptide. Using a transferred NOE approach, we found clear evidence of a weak peptide-enzyme complex formation. The peptide adopts a U-turn shape originating from the proline residues within the primary sequence that is stabilized by its interaction with the peptidase and leaves key residues of the cleavage region exposed for proteolysis. In dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles the signal peptide also adopts a U-turn shape comparable with that observed in association with the enzyme. In both environments this conformation is stabilized by the signal peptide phenylalanine side chain-interaction with enzyme or lipid mimetic. Moreover, in the presence of DPC, the N-terminal core region residues of the peptide adopt a helical motif and based on PRE (paramagnetic relaxation enhancement) experiments are shown to be buried within the membrane. Taken together, this is consistent with proteolysis of the preprotein occurring while the signal peptide remains in the bilayer and the enzyme active site functioning at the membrane surface.     

The role of the membrane-spanning domain of type I signal peptidases in substrate cleavage site selection

Type I signal peptidase (SPase I) catalyzes the cleavage of the amino-terminal signal sequences from preproteins destined for cell export. Preproteins contain a signal sequence with a positively charged n-region, a hydrophobic h-region, and a neutral but polar c-region. Despite having no distinct consensus sequence other than a commonly found c-region "Ala-X-Ala" motif preceding the cleavage site, signal sequences are recognized by SPase I with high fidelity. Remarkably, other potential Ala-X-Ala sites are not cleaved within the preprotein. One hypothesis is that the source of this fidelity is due to the anchoring of both the SPase I enzyme (by way of its transmembrane segment) and the preprotein substrate (by the h-region in the signal sequence) in the membrane. This limits the enzyme-substrate interactions such that cleavage occurs at only one site. In this work we have, for the first time, successfully isolated Bacillus subtilis type I signal peptidase (SipS) and a truncated version lacking the transmembrane domain (SipS-P2). With purified full-length as well as truncated constructs of both B. subtilis and Escherichia coli (Lep) SPase I, in vitro specificity studies indicate that the transmembrane domains of either enzyme are not important determinants of in vitro cleavage fidelity, since enzyme constructs lacking them reveal no alternate site processing of pro-OmpA nuclease A substrate. In addition, experiments with mutant pro-OmpA nuclease A substrate constructs indicate that the h-region of the signal peptide is also not critical for substrate specificity. In contrast, certain mutants in the c-region of the signal peptide result in alternate site cleavage by both Lep and SipS enzymes.     

Analysis of type I signal peptidase affinity and specificity for preprotein substrates

Type I signal peptidases (SPases) are membrane-bound endopeptidases responsible for the catalytic cleavage of signal peptides from secretory proteins. Here, we analysed the interaction between a bacterial type I SPase and preprotein substrates using surface plasmon resonance. The use of a home-made biosensor surface based on a mixed self-assembled monolayer of thiols on gold allowed qualitative and kinetic analysis. In vitro binding of purified preproteins to a covalently immobilised bacterial SPase was found to be rather efficient (apparent K(D)=10(-7)-10(-8)M). The signal peptide was shown to be a prerequisite for SPase binding and the nature of the mature part of the preprotein significantly affected SPase binding affinity. The developed biosensor containing immobilised SPase is of great importance for analysis of specificity at substrate binding level and for drug screening. In fact, this is the first report of a membrane protein that was covalently attached to a biosensor surface and that retained binding capacity.     

Competitive Inhibition of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Signal Peptidase by Non-cleavable Mutant Preprotein Cargos

Upon translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, secretory proteins are proteolytically processed to remove their signal peptide by signal peptidase (SPase). This process is critical for subsequent folding, intracellular trafficking, and maturation of secretory proteins. Prokaryotic SPase has been shown to be a promising antibiotic target. In contrast, to date, no eukaryotic SPase inhibitors have been reported. Here we report that introducing a proline immediately following the natural signal peptide cleavage site not only blocks preprotein cleavage but also, in trans, impairs the processing and maturation of co-expressed preproteins in the ER. Specifically, we find that a variant preproinsulin, pPI-F25P, is translocated across the ER membrane, where it binds to the catalytic SPase subunit SEC11A, inhibiting SPase activity in a dose-dependent manner. Similar findings were obtained with an analogous variant of preproparathyroid hormone, demonstrating that inhibition of the SPase does not depend strictly on the sequence or structure of the downstream mature protein. We further show that inhibiting SPase in the ER impairs intracellular processing of viral polypeptides and their subsequent maturation. These observations suggest that eukaryotic SPases (including the human ortholog) are, in principle, suitable therapeutic targets for antiviral drug design.     

Evaluating signal peptide prediction methods for Gram-positive bacteria

Gram-positive bacteria have been widely investigated for their huge capability to secrete proteins, such as those involved in gene expression, bacterial surface display and bacterial pathogenesis. The N-terminal signal peptide of a secretory protein is responsible for the translocation of polypeptide through the cytoplasmic membrane. Recently, the signal peptide prediction has become a major task in bioinformatics, and many programs with different algorithms were developed to predict signal peptides. In this paper, five prediction programs (SignalP 3.0, PrediSi, Phobius, SOSUIsignal and SIG-Pred) were selected to evaluate their prediction accuracy for signal peptides and cleavage site using 509 unbiased and experimentally verified Gram-positive protein sequences. The results showed that SignalP was the most accurate program in signal peptide (96% accuracy) and cleavage site (83%) prediction. Prediction performance could further be improved by combining multiple methods into consensus prediction, which would increase the accuracy to 98%, and decrease the false positive to zero. When the consensus method was used to predict Bacillus’s extracellular proteins identified by proteomics, more new signal peptides were successfully identified. It could be concluded that the consensus method would be useful to make prediction of signal peptides more reliable.     

Energetics of SecA dimerization

Transport of many proteins to extracytoplasmic locations occurs via the general secretion (Sec) pathway. In Escherichia coli, this pathway is composed of the SecYEG protein-conducting channel and the SecA ATPase. SecA plays a central role in binding the signal peptide region of preproteins, directing preproteins to membrane-bound SecYEG and promoting translocation coupled with ATP hydrolysis. Although it is well established that SecA is crucial for preprotein transport and thus cell viability, its oligomeric state during different stages of transport remains ill defined. We have characterized the energetics of SecA dimerization as a function of salt concentration and temperature and defined the linkage of SecA dimerization and signal peptide binding using analytical ultracentrifugation. The use of a new fluorescence detector permitted an analysis of SecA dimerization down to concentrations as low as 50 nM. The dimer dissociation constants are strongly dependent on salt. Linkage analysis indicates that SecA dimerization is coupled to the release of about five ions, demonstrating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in stabilizing the SecA dimer interface. Binding of signal peptide reduces SecA dimerization affinity, such that K_d increases about 9-fold from 0.28 μM in the absence of peptide to 2.68 μM in the presence of peptide. The weakening of the SecA dimer that accompanies signal peptide binding may poise the SecA dimer to dissociate upon binding to SecYEG.     

Mitochondrial import receptors Tom20 and Tom22 have chaperone-like activity

Mitochondrial preproteins are synthesized in the cytosol with N-terminal signal sequences (presequences) or internal targeting signals. Generally, preproteins with presequences are initially recognized by Tom20 (translocase of the outer membrane) and, subsequently, by Tom22, whereas hydrophobic preproteins with internal targeting signals are first recognized by Tom70. Recent studies suggest that Tom70 associates with molecular chaperones, thereby maintaining their substrate preproteins in an import-competent state. However, such a function has not been reported for other Tom component(s). Here, we investigated a role for Tom20 in preventing substrate preproteins from aggregating. In vitro binding assays showed that Tom20 binds to guanidinium chloride unfolded substrate proteins regardless of the presence or absence of presequences. This suggests that Tom20 functions as a receptor not only for presequences but also for mature portions exposed in unfolded preproteins. Aggregation suppression assays on citrate synthase showed that the cytosolic domain of Tom20 has a chaperone-like activity to prevent this protein from aggregating. This activity was inhibited by a presequence peptide, suggesting that the binding site of Tom20 for presequence is identical or close to the active site for the chaperone-like activity. The cytosolic domain of Tom22 also showed a similar activity for citrate synthase, whereas Tom70 did not. These results suggest that the cytosolic domains of Tom20 and Tom22 function to maintain their substrate preproteins unfolded and prevent them from aggregating on the mitochondrial surface.     

The protease-activated receptor 1 possesses a functional and cleavable signal peptide which is necessary for receptor expression

The protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is activated by thrombin cleavage releasing the physiologically-relevant parstatin peptide (residues 1-41). However, the actual length of parstatin was unclear since the receptor may also possess a cleavable signal peptide (residues 1-21) according to prediction programs. Here, we show that this putative signal peptide is indeed functional and removed from the PAR1 resolving the question of parstatin length. Moreover, we show that the sequence encoding the signal peptide may surprisingly play a role in stabilization of the PAR1 mRNA, a function which would be novel for a G protein-coupled receptor.     

Type I signal peptidase: an overview

The signal hypothesis suggests that proteins contain information within their amino acid sequences for protein targeting to the membrane. These distinct targeting sequences are cleaved by specific enzymes known as signal peptidases. There are various type of signal peptidases known such as type I, type II, and type IV. Type I signal peptidases are indispensable enzymes, which catalyze the cleavage of the amino-terminal signal-peptide sequences from preproteins, which are translocated across biological membranes. These enzymes belong to a novel group of serine proteases, which generally utilize a Ser-Lys or Ser-His catalytic dyad instead of the prototypical Ser-His-Asp triad. Despite having no distinct consensus sequence other than a commonly found 'Ala-X-Ala' motif preceding the cleavage site, signal sequences are recognized by type I signal peptidase with high fidelity. Type I signal peptidases have been found in bacteria, archaea, fungi, plants, and animals. In this review, I present an overview of bacterial type I signal peptidases and describe some of their properties in detail.     

Signal peptide prediction based on analysis of experimentally verified cleavage sites

A number of computational tools are available for detecting signal peptides, but their abilities to locate the signal peptide cleavage sites vary significantly and are often less than satisfactory. We characterized a set of 270 secreted recombinant human proteins by automated Edman analysis and used the verified cleavage sites to evaluate the success rate of a number of computational prediction programs. An examination of the frequency of amino acid in the N-terminal region of the data set showed a preference of proline and glutamine but a bias against tyrosine. The data set was compared to the SWISS-PROT database and revealed a high percentage of discrepancies with cleavage site annotations that were computationally generated. The best program for predicting signal sequences was found to be SignalP 2.0-NN with an accuracy of 78.1% for cleavage site recognition. The new data set can be utilized for refining prediction algorithms, and we have built an improved version of profile hidden Markov model for signal peptides based on the new data.     

Structural requirement of C‐terminal region of chicken lysozyme signal peptide

Abstract

The mechanisms of signal peptide cleavage has not been fully elucidated yet. In previous investigation, we have examined the effect of chicken lysozyme signal peptide mutations on the secretion of human lysozyme. During this study, we determined that the hydrophobic bulky amino acid Val at position ‐1 inhibited the function of signal peptide. To determine why the ‐1Val suppressed the function of signal peptide, turn‐promoting amino acids Pro and Gly were introduced after ‐lVal to prevent the signal peptide from forming α‐helix and induce β‐turn around the cleavage site. This mutation resulted in no processing of signal peptide and no secretion of human lysozyme. However, the replacement of ‐1Val with Ala permitted a functional signal. Based on these results, three dimensional models around the cleavage site of each signal peptide were made, which show that bulky side chain at ‐1 residue of signal peptide limits the reaction space for signal peptidase and suppresses cleavage by steric hindrance. We suggest that the bulky side chain at ‐1 residue suppresses the signal peptide cleavage by its local steric hindrance and not by a change in whole structure around the cleavage site. On the other hand, introduction of Pro at position +1 did not inhibit signal cleavage completely resulting in poor secretion and processing efficiency although Pro in position +1 has been recently reported to block cleavage of the prokaryotic signal peptide. The mechanism of cleavage of prokaryotic signal may be different than that of eukaryotic signal.     

Preprotein transfer to the Escherichia coli translocase requires the co-operative binding of SecB and the signal sequence to SecA

In Escherichia coli , precursor proteins are targeted to the membrane-bound translocase by the cytosolic chaperone SecB. SecB binds to the extreme carboxy-terminus of the SecA ATPase translocase subunit, and this interaction is promoted by preproteins. The mutant SecB proteins, L75Q and E77K, which interfere with preprotein translocation in vivo , are unable to stimulate in vitro translocation. Both mutants bind proOmpA but fail to support the SecA-dependent membrane binding of proOmpA because of a marked reduction in their binding affinities for SecA. The stimulatory effect of preproteins on the interaction between SecB and SecA exclusively involves the signal sequence domain of the preprotein, as it can be mimicked by a synthetic signal peptide and is not observed with a mutant preprotein (Δ8proOmpA) bearing a non-functional signal sequence. Δ8proOmpA is not translocated across wild-type membranes, but the translocation defect is suppressed in inner membrane vesicles derived from a prlA4 strain. SecB reduces the translocation of Δ8proOmpA into these vesicles and almost completely prevents translocation when, in addition, the SecB binding site on SecA is removed. These data demonstrate that efficient targeting of preproteins by SecB requires both a functional signal sequence and a SecB binding domain on SecA. It is concluded that the SecB–SecA interaction is needed to dissociate the mature preprotein domain from SecB and that binding of the signal sequence domain to SecA is required to ensure efficient transfer of the preprotein to the translocase.     

Evidence that SecB enhances the activity of SecA

In Escherichia coli, SecA is a critical component of the protein transport machinery which powers the translocation process by hydrolyzing ATP and recognizing signal peptides which are the earmark of secretory proteins. In contrast, SecB is utilized by only a subset of preproteins to prevent their premature folding and chaperone them to membrane-bound SecA. Using purified components and synthetic signal peptides, we have studied the interaction of SecB with SecA and with SecA-signal peptide complexes in vitro. Using a chemical cross-linking approach, we find that the formation of SecA-SecB complexes is accompanied by a decrease in the level of cross-linking of SecA dimers, suggesting that SecB induces a conformational change in SecA. Furthermore, functional signal peptides, but not dysfunctional ones, promote the formation of SecA-SecB complexes. SecB is also shown to directly enhance the ATPase activity of SecA in a concentration-dependent and saturable manner. To determine the biological consequence of this finding, the influence of SecB on the signal peptide-stimulated SecA/lipid ATPase was studied using synthetic peptides of varying hydrophobicity. Interestingly, the presence of SecB can sufficiently boost the response of signal peptides with moderate hydrophobicity such that it is comparable to the activity generated by a more hydrophobic peptide in the absence of SecB. The results suggest that SecB directly enhances the activity of SecA and provide a biochemical basis for the enhanced transport efficiency of preproteins in the presence of SecB in vivo.     

Transit peptide cleavage sites of integral thylakoid membrane proteins

A set of 58 nuclearly encoded thylakoid-integral membrane proteins from four plant species was identified, and their amino termini were assigned unequivocally based upon mass spectrometry of intact proteins and peptide fragments. The dataset was used to challenge the Web tools ChloroP, TargetP, SignalP, PSORT, Predotar, and MitoProt II for predicting organelle targeting and transit peptide proteolysis sites. ChloroP and TargetP reliably predicted chloroplast targeting but only reliably predicted transit peptide cleavage sites for soluble proteins targeted to the stroma. SignalP (eukaryote settings) accurately predicted the transit peptide cleavage site for soluble proteins targeted to the lumen. SignalP (Gram-negative bacteria settings) reliably predicted peptide cleavage of integral thylakoid proteins inserted into the membrane via the "spontaneous" pathway. The processing sites of more common thylakoid-integral proteins inserted by the signal recognition peptide-dependent pathway were not well predicted by any of the programs. The results suggest the presence of a second thylakoid processing protease that recognizes the transit peptide of integral proteins inserted via the spontaneous mechanism and that this mechanism may be related to the secretory mechanism of Gram-negative bacteria.     

Characterization of the cleavage of signal peptide at the C-terminus of hepatitis C virus core protein by signal peptide peptidase

Production of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein requires the cleavages of polyprotein by signal peptidase and signal peptide peptidase (SPP). Cleavage of signal peptide at the C-terminus of HCV core protein by SPP was characterized in this study. The spko mutant (mutate a.a. 189–193 from ASAYQ to PPFPF) is more efficient than the A/F mutant (mutate a.a 189 and 191 from A to F) in blocking the cleavage of signal peptide by signal peptidase. The cleavage efficiency of SPP is inversely proportional to the length of C-terminal extension of the signal peptide: the longer the extension, the less efficiency the cleavage is. Thus, reducing the length of C-terminal extension of signal peptide by signal peptidase cleavage could facilitate further cleavage by SPP. The recombinant core protein fused with signal peptide from the C-terminus of p7 protein, but not those from the C-termini of E1 and E2, could be cleaved by SPP. Therefore, the sequence of the signal peptide is important but not the sole determinant for its cleavage by SPP. Replacement of the HCV core protein E.R.-associated domain (a.a. 120–150) with the E.R.-associated domain (a.a.1–50) of SARS-CoV membrane protein results in the failure of cleavage of this recombinant protein by SPP, though this protein still is E.R.-associated. This result suggests that not only E.R.-association but also specific protein sequence is important for the HCV core protein signal peptide cleavage by SPP. Thus, our results suggest that both sequences of the signal peptide and the E.R.-associated domain are important for the signal peptide cleavage of HCV core protein by SPP. Electronic Supplementary MaterialThe online version of this article (doi: ) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

In vitro processing of tomato proteinase inhibitor I by barley microsomal membranes: a system for analysis of cotranslational processing of plant endomembrane proteins

A plant-derived in vitro system for the study of cotranslational processing of plant endomembrane proteins has been developed and used to investigate cotranslational proteolytic processing of tomato proteinase inhibitor I. Translation of the inhibitor I precursor in wheat germ lysate supplemented with barley aleurone microsomal membranes resulted in cotranslational import of the protein into microsomal vesicles and cleavage of the signal sequence. NH₂-terminal sequence analysis of the translocated inhibitor I processing intermediate showed that the signal sequence was cleaved between Ala₂₃ and Arg₂₄ of the precursor protein. Parallel experiments using dog pancreas microsomal membranes indicated an identical site of cleavage, suggesting that the substrate determinants for signal sequence processing are conserved across kingdoms. The plant-derived processing system used for this study may be valuable for analysis of cotranslational processing of other plant preproteins and for characterizing the components of the cotranslational import machinery in plants.     

Selective photoaffinity labeling identifies the signal peptide binding domain on SecA

SecA, an ATPase crucial to the Sec-dependent translocation machinery in Escherichia coli, recognizes and directly binds the N-terminal signal peptide of an exported preprotein. This interaction plays a central role in the targeting and transport of preproteins via the SecYEG channel. Here we identify the signal peptide binding groove (SPBG) on SecA addressing a key issue regarding the SecA-preprotein interaction. We employ a synthetic signal peptide containing the photoreactive benzoylphenylalanine to efficiently and specifically label SecA containing a unique Factor Xa site. Comparison of the photolabeled fragment from the subsequent proteolysis of several SecAs, which vary only in the location of the Factor Xa site, reveals one 53 residue segment in common with the entire series. The covalently modified SecA segment produced is the same in aqueous solution and in lipid vesicles. This spans amino acid residues 269 to 322 of the E. coli protein, which is distinct from a previously proposed signal peptide binding site, and contributes to a hydrophobic peptide binding groove evident in molecular models of SecA.