Prognostic value of CA 15.3 kinetics for metastatic breast cancer

Up to 80% of breast cancer patients developing metastases have high levels of CA 15.3. We studied the prognostic implications of CA 15.3 kinetics in 119 patients before and at first metastasis by univariate and multivariate statistics. At first metastasis, CA 15.3 was elevated in 82.4% of patients, with a lead time (median 162 days) in 42.0% of them. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed overall survival (median 1477 days) to be significantly related to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status (p=0.0001) and tumor size (p=0.025). The interval between diagnosis and first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0001), the CA 15.3 concentration (p=0.013), and the presence or absence of a lead time (p=0.001) also had prognostic value. ER and PgR status (p=0.0005 and p=0.0103, respectively), metastasis-free interval (p=0.0003), existence of a CA 15.3 lead time (p=0.0028), and days from diagnosis to first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0055) entered in the Cox model. After first metastasis (median survival 573 days), ER and PgR status (p=0.0001 and p=0.0004, respectively), existence of a lead time for CA 15.3 (p=0.0138), and the concentration of first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0145) had individual prognostic value. In the Cox model ER status (p=0.0001), nodal status (p=0.0191), existence of a lead time for CA 15.3 (p=0.0033), days from diagnosis to first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0132), and concentration of first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0320) were found to be independent prognostic variables. Compared to a matched historical control group that was not monitored by CA 15.3 assaying (n=140), the study group had a significantly longer survival after the first metastasis (p=0.0005). In conclusion, the kinetics of CA 15.3 before the first metastasis is of prognostic value. When associated with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging, serial CA 15.3 assays may help to implement early treatment of metastases.     

Serum tumor markers may precede instrumental response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer

PURPOSE: Although serum tumor markers (STMs) are widely used in clinical practice, their predictive role for the response to anticancer treatment is still controversial. The correlation of CEA, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CA 125 (only with peritoneal involvement) and NSE levels with imaging response and clinical benefit was investigated in 60 non-selected patients with metastatic epithelial cancers treated by single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: STM measurement was performed at baseline and subsequently every three to four weeks. We applied the WHO criteria to evaluate both STM and instrumental responses. Concordance analysis was performed by the Cohen Kw index, and the significance of the results was established using the Fleiss, Cohen & Everitt test. Qualitative interpretation of data was obtained with the Landis & Koch scale. Correlations of STM response with clinical benefit (PS or pain improvement) were evaluated by the chi-square test. RESULTS: The primary tumors included breast cancers (38 patients), gastrointestinal non-colorectal cancers (12 patients), and lung cancers (10 patients). An overall significant good degree of agreement was observed between STM and instrumental response (p < 0.0005). The degree of agreement for each marker was as follows: excellent for CEA (p < 0.0005) and CA 125 (p = 0.006), good for CA 15.3 (p < 0.0005) and CA 19.9 (p = 0.011). Restricted analysis for the correlation of each marker with primary tumor origin showed good prediction of radiological response for CA 15.3 and CEA in breast cancer patients (p<0.0005 for both), for CEA and CA 19.9 in gastrointestinal cancer patients (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and for CEA+NSE in lung cancer patients (p = 0.01). Conversely, STM response did not correlate significantly with the clinical benefit for the patients, both in terms of PS and pain improvement (p = 0.24 and p=0.42, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed STMs to be good predictors of tumor response. Although STMs cannot replace diagnostic imaging, in metastatic cancer they might be useful to optimize the timing of radiological re-evaluation in the palliative setting.     

Circulating CA 15.3 levels in breast cancer. Our present experience

CA 15.3 is an antigen expressed by human breast carcinoma cells, and defined by two monoclonal antibodies, 115D8 and DF3. We used IRMA to determine the circulating serum levels of CA 15.3 in 1178 subjects with breast cancer, non-breast malignancies, benign diseases and controls. A threshold level of 40 U/ml was established with 140 healthy controls and 650 patients with benign diseases (respectively 0% subjects and 1.5% patients had abnormal antigen levels). Elevated CA 15.3 was found in 12 of 184 patients with malignancies different from breast cancer (6.5%), either epithelial carcinomas with distant metastases, mainly in the liver, or primary liver tumors. Breast cancer patients (n = 204) were analysed by prior therapy, UICC stage and WHO response to therapy. Eight of 134 (5.9%) patients with stage II or III breast cancer at presentation and no evidence of disease (NED) had elevated CA 15.3. All of 22 patients with stage IV breast cancer not responding to therapy (SD and PD) had antigen levels greater than 40 U/ml, as did 10 of 34 (29.4%) stage IV patients in objective response (CR + PR). Three of 14 pretreatment patients had abnormal marker levels, and they later proved to have distant metastases. Serum CA 15.3 values were statistically different (p less than 0.01) in NED (20.6 +/- 11.2 U/ml), CR + PR (33.5 +/- 24.0 U/ml), stable disease (98.8 +/- 50.4 U/ml) and progressive disease (greater than 200 U/ml) breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that circulating CA 15.3 antigen levels agree with the stage of breast cancer and with the response to therapy.     

CA 15.3 as a tumour marker in breast cancer

CA 15.3 is an antigenic determinant associated with human mammary carcinomas. Two murine monoclonal antibodies have been raised against the determinants, and an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA-Kit, Centocor, USA) has been developed to determine the antigen levels in plasma of cancer patients. Based on the 99% confidence limit of healthy women, plasma values above 30 U/ml are considered abnormal. Plasma samples from 357 women were examined in the present study. Healthy females (n = 84) ranged below the cut-off level between less than 10 and 29 U/ml. Higher values were found in 12.5% of benign breast diseases and in 23.6% of breast cancer patients, including all stages. Depending on the stage of the disease, there were elevated levels in 11% of operable breast cancer patients preoperatively, in 7% of the cases with no evidence of disease after primary treatment and in 63.5% of patients with disseminated mammary carcinoma. In metastasized breast cancer the frequency and the degree of abnormal titers were closely related to the extent of the metastatic disease. Follow-up examinations of 63 patients under cytotoxic therapy showed CA 15.3 changes correlating well with the clinical course in up to 90% of the antigen positive cases. The present data indicate that CA 15.3 may be useful in the surveillance of breast cancer patients. However in our study one third of the patients with metastatic breast cancer did not show any increase in CA 15.3 and must be regarded as antigen negative.     

MCA in patients with breast cancer: correlation with CEA and CA15-3

MCA serum levels were determined in 27 healthy subjects, 136 with benign pathology (42 breast) and in 289 patients with cancer (247 active). The last group includes 223 patients with breast cancer (96 without metastases, 89 with metastases and 38 no-evidence of disease). CEA and CA15-3 serum levels were determined in all the patients with breast diseases. The mean levels of MCA were 4.7 + 2.4 U/ml in the control group, considering less than 11 U/ml as normal. MCA values were abnormal in 15.4% of patients with benign pathology, mainly in those with liver cirrhosis (8/20) and lung diseases (4/20). In the majority of these cases, the rise was only moderate, lower than 15 U/ml in 97.5% of patients. In malignant diseases, important increments were found in breast cancer (19.8% Mo, 77.5% M1) and ovarian cancer stages III-IV (44.4%). When we compared MCA serum levels with CA15-3 and CEA in breast pathology, a similar specificity was observed: 92.3%, 92.3% and 100% in cases with benign pathology and 92.1%, 94.7%, and 97.4% in NED patients, respectively. MCA and CA15-3 sensitivity was similar in breast cancer without metastases (19.8%) and lower for CEA (16.7%). In patients with breast cancer without metastases, we found a relation between positivity of these tumor markers and prognostic factors (tumor size, nodal involvement). The disease free interval in patients with locoregional breast cancer was shorter in cases with abnormal presurgical levels of some of the tumor markers, but only the difference from MCA was significant (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

CA 15.3 and CEA plasma level monitoring in patients with breast cancer

CA 15.3 and CEA were determined in the serum of 217 patients with early and advanced breast carcinoma. CA 15.3 was high (greater than 30 U/ml) in 1/6 (17%) patients with stage I-II primary tumor, in 4/77 (5%) patients without clinical signs of disease after mastectomy, in 67/102 (65%) patients with advanced disease in progression, and in 13/32 (41%) patients with advanced disease not in progression and undergoing therapy. The corresponding incidences of pathological CEA values (greater than 2.5 ng/ml) were 33, 8, 55 and 14%. The combination of the two markers brings about a certain improvement in the sensitivity for recognising patients with advanced disease in progression (79/102 = 77%). The presence of high values of CA 15.3 is statistically correlated to the prevalent site of metastases (bone and viscera greater than soft tissues). Monitoring the two markers during antitumor therapy in 36 patients showed good accordance (56%) between CA 15.3 changes and response to therapy. The decrease of the marker in patients who achieved partial remission was statistically significant. In conclusion, CA 15.3 is more sensitive than CEA in recognising patients with advanced disease in progression and gives better accordance with the response to therapy. The simultaneous use of the two markers may be useful in the follow-up of operated patients and in monitoring the disease during treatment.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) in preoperative staging and postoperative monitoring of patients with carcinoma of the breast

Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) were determined in patients with breast carcinoma: in 129 before initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment and in 134 afterwards. Before any initial treatment, CEA was elevated in 15% of patients with Stage IV disease and CA 15.3 was high in 11% with Stage III and 48% with Stage IV. While monitoring management active disease was associated with elevated serum CEA in 66% of the patients, with elevated CA 15.3 in 73% and with at least one of the markers elevated in 86%. Both tests had high specificity (93% and 98%). The rise in serum CEA and, even more so, of serum CA 15.3 roughly paralleled the increase in bulk of the tumor: from locoregional disease through metastases to the lungs, bones, lungs with bones, and liver. Decreases in the levels of serum CEA and CA 15.3 reflected response to therapy, increases in the level of at least one marker-treatment failure, and levels fluctuating above the normal range indicated stationary disease. During follow-up, the predictive value of a negative test (levels within the normal range), suggesting that the patient might be free of disease, was 61% for CEA alone, 67% for CA 15.3 alone, and 80% for the two tests combined. We conclude that an elevated serum level of only one of the markers was useful for staging, implying advanced disease. Determination of both markers jointly was useful for monitoring the effectiveness of the therapy and for follow-up aimed at detection of relapse.     

Telomerase activity in breast cancer in Western India (Gujarat)

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of telomerase activity with clinical and histopathological prognostic variables in primary breast cancer (n=64). Telomerase activity in breast cancer was also compared with that in benign (n=10) and non-malignant tissues (n=8; post-lumpectomy tissues histopathologically defined as containing no residual tumor). The parameter was assessed using the Telomerase PCR ELISA kit. Values above OD 0.120 were considered positive. Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) were assayed by the dextran-coated charcoal method and levels >10 fmol/mg cytosol protein were taken as positive. Telomerase activity was detected in 20% and 50% of the patients with benign lesions and primary breast cancer, respectively, and in 50% of post-lumpectomy breast tissues histopathologically defined as containing no residual tumor. Telomerase activity was present in all stages of breast carcinoma and showed a significant inverse correlation with lymph node status (p=0.006), lymphatic invasion (p=0.035) and necrosis (p=0.033). Moreover, when stage II patients were grouped according to nodal involvement, a trend towards significance was observed (p=0.055). No correlation was observed with ER and PgR. The results of our study suggest that telomerase activity might be associated with the presence of cancer cells. Furthermore, telomerase activation may occur early in breast cancer and may be periodically downregulated during subsequent tumor progression.     

Serum HER-2 extracellular domain: relationship with clinicobiological presentation and prognostic value before and after primary treatment in 701 breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical correlations and prognostic value of serum HER-2 (sHER-2) before and after primary breast cancer treatment. METHODS: sHER-2 from 701 consecutive patients with stage I-III tumors (median follow-up 7.7 years) was assayed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Immuno 1, Bayer Diagnostics). RESULTS: The median pretreatment sHER-2 concentration was 8.30 ng/mL (range 3.15-82.00 ng/mL). Forty-seven patients (6.7%) had sHER-2 concentrations >12 ng/mL (cutoff level). Pretreatment sHER-2 correlated positively with CA 15.3 (p=0.0169), pathological tumor size (p=0.0082), number of invaded lymph nodes (pN, p=0.0160) and histological grading (p=0.0086). Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that pretreatment sHER-2 was of prognostic value for contralateral breast cancer (p=0.0018), metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p=0.0008) - particularly lung (p=0.0082) and liver metastases (p=0.0035) - and overall disease-specific survival (DSS) (p=0.0020). According to pN status, pretreatment sHER-2 was of prognostic value only for pN-positive patients (p=0.0017). When combined with estradiol or progesterone receptor status, patients with elevated sHER-2 and receptor-negative tumors had a significantly shorter DSS (p<0.0001 for both receptors). Post-treatment sHER-2 also had individual prognostic value for MFS (p=0.0144) and DSS (p=0.0212). In multivariate analysis, only sHER-2 after primary treatment was an independent prognostic variable for MFS and DSS (p=0.0078 and p=0.0058, respectively). CONCLUSION: sHER-2 elevation in early breast cancer correlates with the principal criteria of tumor aggressiveness, thus permitting selection of patients with a high risk of visceral metastases and contralateral breast tumors. Post-treatment sHER-2 is an independent prognostic factor enabling to identify patients likely to benefit from aggressive adjuvant treatments.     

High levels of cathepsin B predict poor outcome in patients with breast cancer

Cathepsin B (CB) is a thiol-stimulated protease implicated in cancer invasion and metastasis. Other proteases involved in cancer spread such as urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and cathepsin D have previously been shown to be prognostic markers in breast cancer. CB was assayed by ELISA in 193 patients with primary breast cancer. CB levels were significantly higher in both primary and metastatic breast tumors than in fibroadenomas (p = 0.0001). In the primary carcinomas, CB levels showed no significant correlation with either nodal status, tumor size or estrogen receptor (ER) status. Patients with primary breast cancers containing high levels of CB had a significantly shorter disease-free interval (p = 0.01, chi-square = 6.61) and overall survival (p = 0.014, chi-square = 6.08) than patients with low levels of the protease. However, in multivariate analysis, using nodal status, tumor size, ER status and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), CB was not an independent prognostic marker. In contrast, nodal status, ER status and uPA were prognostic in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, CB, like certain other proteases implicated in cancer metastasis, correlates with poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. These results thus support the evidence from model systems linking CB to cancer spread. Inhibition of CB expression or activity might therefore be exploited for anti-metastatic therapies.     

Preoperative and longitudinal serum levels of CA 125 and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer

Serum levels of ovarian carcinoma antigen (CA 125) and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) were determined in 237 patients with breast carcinoma, 121 before any therapy and 116 after initial treatment, during uneventful follow-up or at the time of relapse. The aim was to assess how often the CA 125 test failed, i.e., was false-negative in patients in whom the CA 15.3 test was true-positive and, more important, whether it gave diagnostic information in patients in whom the CA 15.3 test failed. Before surgery or other initial therapy, serum CA 125 and CA 15.3 gave similar information in 85.1 percent of the patients: true-positive in 4.1 percent and false negative in 81.0 percent: CA 125 gave less information in 13.2 percent; and more information in only 1.7 percent. During follow-up, serum CA 125 and CA 15.3 gave similar information in 73.3 percent of the patients: true-positive (i.e., rising persistently from a nadir or elevated above 65 U/ml) in 23.3 percent, true-negative in 36.2 percent, and false-negative in 13.8 percent; CA 125 gave less information in 25.0 percent: false negative in 22.4 percent and false-positive in 2.6 percent; and more information in only 1.7 percent. Therefore, the CA 125 test appears useless for staging and is redundant when the CA 15.3 test is employed, for management of patients with breast cancer.     

Evaluation of HER-2/neu in serum and tissue of primary and metastatic breast cancer patients using an automated enzyme immunoassay

Serum HER-2/neu concentrations were evaluated in 172 healthy subjects, 176 primary and 55 metastatic breast cancer patients, employing a new automated assay (Bayer Immuno 1 serum HER-2/neu). Using 13 ng/mL as the cutoff, abnormal HER-2/neu serum levels were found in 8% (14/176) of primary and 50.9% (28/55) of metastatic breast cancer patients. Both in primary and metastatic breast cancer a significant relationship was found with the stage of the disease when serum HER-2/neu was considered as a categorized variable (p=0.0003 and p=0.02, respectively), but not when it was taken as a continuous variable (p=0.247 and p=0.146, respectively). Moreover, we evaluated the correlation between Immuno 1 HER-2/neu and Oncogene Research Products ELISA assay in 53 normal subjects, 46 primary and 34 metastatic breast cancer patients. The correlation was relatively good (p<0.0001), although substantial differences could be found in single cases. The Immuno 1 assay was also evaluated for the first time in breast cancer tissue. The method, which showed good performance both in terms of imprecision and linearity, was used to measure HER-2/neu protein in 140 cytosol samples from primary breast cancer tissue and in homogenates from 40 matched cases. The correlation between the two matrixes was very close (p<0.0001). By contrast, no correlation was found between serum and matched cytosol (p=0.101) or homogenate samples (p=0.511).     

Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes from the results of radioisotopic study

The purpose of the investigation was to study the pattern of 99mTc (MIBI) technitrile uptake in the metastatically involved lymph nodes in breast cancer, by applying the plain scintigraphic technique. The scintigraphic study of the breast and regional metastatic areas by means of the radionuclide 99mTc (MIBI) technitrile was made on a Millennium GE tomographic gamma chamber. The radiotracer 550 (MBq) dissolved in 10-20 ml of saline solution was intravenously injected into the arm cubital vein contralaterally to the lesion. Following 20 minutes of injection of the agent, plain scintigraphy was carried out in three standard projections: frontal and two oblique ones. The scintigraphy was performed using a high-resolution collimator recording a 128 x 128 matrix image. The detector was maximally approximated to the organ being examined. A plain scintigraphic scan was recorded on each side for 10 minutes. By the degree of axillary lymph nodal involvement, the patients were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the international TNM classification: N0 (n = 55), N1 (n = 13), N2 (n = 4). Among 72 patients, axillary lymph nodes could be detected in 6, in 2 of them changes were not diagnosed by X-ray and ultrasound studies. The final pathomorphological study of intraoperative materials revealed axillary lymph nodal metastatic involvement in 17 patients. A micrometastasis in one lymph node was found in 1 patient. None of the radionuclide studies showed tumor spread in 5 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and precision of the technique were 35.3, 100, and 84.7%, respectively. Thus, a combination of the high cost of the procedure, its radiation load on a patient, and its low sensitivity make the use of plain scintigraphy of axillary regions inexpedient in the complex of studies of the extent of breast cancer in the present development of technology.     

Efficiency of a Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology to Detect Patients with Extensive Axillary Lymph Node Involvement

Background

Recent studies have demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) does not affect patient survival, even in those with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). On the other hand, patients with 3 or more metastatic lymph nodes are eligible for chemotherapy. Therefore, it is crucial to identify a priori patients at risk of having a high number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes for their surgical and/or clinical management. Ultrasound (US) guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) has been proven to be a useful and highly specific method for detecting metastatic axillary lymph nodes. However, only one recent study has evaluated the efficiency of this method in identifying patients with high metastatic nodal involvement. Our aim was to validate US-guided FNA as a reliable method to discriminate a priori patients with >3 metastatic lymph nodes.

Methods

A retrospective series of 1287 breast cancer patients who underwent a simultaneous preoperative breast and axillary US to stage their axilla was collected. A total of 365 patients, with either positive SLNs (278) or positive axillary lymph nodes detected via US-guided FNA (87), underwent ALND. In these two subgroups, we compared the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla.

Results

The number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients who underwent US-guided FNA was significantly higher (63% had >3 metastatic lymph nodes) than that in patients with SLNs positive for micro- or macrometastases (3% and 27%, respectively) (P<0.001, χ ² = 117.897).

Conclusions

Preoperative axillary US-guided FNA could act as a reliable tool in identifying breast cancer patients with extensive nodal involvement.     

Evaluation of chromogranin A expression in serum and tissues of breast cancer patients

Human chromogranin A (CgA) is a member of the granin family and is widely distributed in large dense core granules of endocrine and neuroendocrine cells. A variety of non-neuroendocrine carcinomas arising in various tissues show patterns of neuroendocrine differentiation. Expression of CgA has been documented in epithelial cells of normal mammary gland as well as in breast cancers, and elevation of serum CgA has been detected in patients with breast cancer. Our study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between serum CgA levels and neuroendocrine features in breast cancer. In addition, we evaluated the expression of serum CgA in patients affected by breast cancer compared to controls and the relationship between serum CgA and tumor histology, extent of disease, lymph node status, tumor stage and serum CA 15.3 levels. We enrolled 266 patients with infiltrating ductal or lobular breast carcinoma and a group of 100 age-matched healthy women serving as controls. Serum CgA and CA 15.3 were assayed by specific immunoradiometric methods. The overall sensitivity of CgA and CA 15.3 was 0.06 and 0.34, respectively (chi2 19.1, p<0.0005). No relationship was found between serum levels of CgA and tumor histology, extent of disease, lymph node status or tumor stage while serum levels of CA 15.3 were strongly correlated with all these variables but tumor histology. No relationship was found between serum levels of CgA and CA 15.3. Immunostaining against CgA, CgB, NSE and synaptophysin was performed on primary tumor tissue of 14 serum CgA-positive and 24 serum CgA-negative patients and was negative in all cases. We also evaluated eight cases of pathologically-proven neuroendocrine breast cancer: only four and two of these showed positive CgA immunostaining and increased serum CgA concentration, respectively. In conclusion, serum CgA assay offers no additional information regarding the presence, the extent and the histology of breast cancer compared to the CA 15.3 assay. Moreover, serum CgA was not an accurate marker to identify or exclude the rare neuroendocrine differentiation of breast cancer. We therefore conclude that CgA is not useful as a serum marker in breast cancer.     

Tumour associated antigens CA 15.3 and CA 125 in ovarian cancer

CA 125 and CA 15.3 antigens were determined by enzyme immunoassay in 78 patients with ovarian cancer for a total of 540 determinations. The antigens were also investigated in sera from 100 women with other gynaecological diseases, 82 lung cancer patients and in 39 pleural fluids of varying origin. CA 15.3 reference values were evaluated in 91 healthy women (cut-off: 25 U/ml). CA 15.3 sensitivity at diagnosis (60%) and for detecting relapse (44%) was lower than that of CA 125 (90% and 64.7%, respectively). However, CA 15.3 does not increase with aspecific mesothelial cell reaction and thus it is more specific than CA 125. Combined use of the markers during follow-up improves early detection of relapse (at least one of the two was positive in 79% of cases). Therefore both CA 15.3 and CA 125 should be routinely determined for the detection and monitoring of ovarian cancer.     

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new tumor marker in breast cancer: CA 27.29.

Evaluation of a radioimmunoassay for a new tumor marker, named CA 27.29, recently proposed for use in breast cancer patients, is reported in this study. After considering the analytical performance, the clinical study was directed to a control group of 66 apparently healthy subjects (Controls), a group of 25 women with benign breast disease (BBD) and a group of 164 breast cancer patients divided into primary before any treatment (M-), in follow-up with no evidence of disease (NED) and presence of metastases (M+). When compared to CA 15.3, our results showed similar sensitivity of both markers with a slightly lower specificity for CA 27.29. In some cases, however, CA 27.29 elevation appears earlier than CA 15.3 as a sign of metastases. We thus propose their associated use.     

ADVIA Centaur HER-2/neu shows value in monitoring patients with metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION:The proteolytic breakdown product corresponding to the extracellular domain (ECD) of the HER-2/neu oncoprotein p185 is found in the circulation of healthy individuals and patients having cancers of epithelial origin. For the current evaluation we sought to determine the analytical performance as well as the clinical utility of the newly developed ADVIA Centaur HER-2/neu assay (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diagnostics Division, Tarrytown, NY, USA) in monitoring patients with metastatic breast cancer during the course of disease and treatment and to compare the obtained results with those of CA 15-3. METHODS: The analytical performance (including precision, normal range, interfering substances, minimum detectable concentration, dilution recovery, spiking recovery and high-dose hook effect) were determined. HER-2/neu and CA 15-3 values were measured in retrospective samples obtained from 59 patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing treatment over a 6-12 month period. Serial changes in serum HER-2/neu and CA 15-3 were correlated with changes in clinical status on a visit-to-visit basis. For each pair of serial measurements, changes of equal to or greater than, or less than 15% for HER-2/neu and 21% for CA 15-3 were considered to indicate progression or lack of progression, respectively. RESULTS: The ADVIA Centaur HER-2/neu assay demonstrated within-run imprecision and total imprecision ranging from 3.0-5.6% and from 3.2-5.7%, respectively. The upper limit of normal was 15.2 ng/mL (90% CI: 14.2-17.0 ng/mL). No significant interference (<5%) was seen with bilirubins, hemoglobin, triglycerides and cholesterol or therapeutic drugs commonly present in the sera of breast cancer patients. The minimum detectable concentration (analytical sensitivity) was found to be 0.5 ng/mL. The patient population in the clinical study included breast cancer patients who responded to therapy (stable, partial or complete response) or had disease progression. HER-2/neu levels showed a concordance of 78.1% (82/105 restaging time points) with the clinical course of disease, whereas CA 15-3 levels showed a concordance of 76.2% (80/105 restaging time points). The concordance with clinical status increased to 85.7% (90/105 restaging time points) when both results were used in combination as a series test. CONCLUSIONS: The ADVIA Centaur HER-2/neu assay provides excellent analytical performance for serial testing of serum HER-2/neu levels. The clinical data demonstrate the usefulness of serum HER-2/neu in monitoring metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment. Furthermore, the results indicate that serum HER-2/neu and CA 15-3 may be useful in identifying disease progression or therapeutic response in different subgroups of women with metastatic breast cancer.     

Prognostic significance of CA 15.3 in metastatic breast cancer

We have investigated the possible relation between serum levels of CA 15.3 and disease status in 110 patients after radical mastectomy for breast cancer, with metastatic diffusion. Its persistent elevation was usually related to a very poor prognosis. In patients who died within 18 months the marker was always elevated. In case of progression of the disease, the marker level appeared to be consistently correlated with the general clinical condition. In healthy patients with stable disease the marker remained near the normal range.     

Prognostic utility of circulating transforming growth factor beta 1 in breast cancer patients

Transforming growth factor betas (TGF-?s) are multifunctional cytokines with a biphasic role in breast tumorigenesis, acting as tumor suppressors at early stages while stimulating tumor progression at later stages (TGF-? switch). Among the 3 human isoforms, TGF-?1 is known to be overexpressed in several tumor types including breast tumors. TGF-? signaling and "crosstalk" in the tumor microenvironment presents a unique challenge and an opportunity to develop novel therapies. We assessed circulating TGF-?1 levels by ELISA in blood samples from 117 previously untreated breast cancer patients in this prospective study to explore the TGF-? switch at the forefront. The levels were correlated with clinicopathological prognosticators like age, menopausal status, nodal status, histological type, histological grade, necrosis, stromal involvement, and survival. Higher mean preoperative serum TGF-?1 was observed in early-stage patients than controls (p=0.05) as revealed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Elevation of TGF-?1 was evident in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer compared with those having early-stage disease (p=0.0001). Prognosticators of an aggressive phenotype were associated with higher TGF-?1 levels, and higher levels thus announced the likelihood of relapse, marking the role of TGF-?1 as a tumor promoter and evidencing the existence of a TGF-? switch. Moreover, higher levels of TGF-?1 shortened the overall survival in breast cancer patients (p=0.010). The results indicate that circulating TGF-?1 may be used as a predictive and prognostic marker in breast carcinoma.