Transfer of rpl22 to the nucleus greatly preceded its loss from the chloroplast and involved the gain of an intron.

Most chloroplast and mitochondrial proteins are encoded by nuclear genes that once resided in the organellar genomes. Transfer of most of these genes appears to have occurred soon after the endosymbiotic origin of organelles, and so little is known about the process. Our efforts to understand how chloroplast genes are functionally transferred to the nuclear genome have led us to discover the most recent evolutionary gene transfer yet described. The gene rpl22, encoding chloroplast ribosomal protein CL22, is present in the chloroplast genome of all plants examined except legumes, while a functional copy of rpl22 is located in the nucleus of the legume pea. The nuclear rpl22 gene has acquired two additional domains relative to its chloroplast ancestor: an exon encoding a putative N-terminal transit peptide, followed by an intron which separates this first exon from the evolutionarily conserved, chloroplast-derived portion of the gene. This gene structure suggests that the transferred region may have acquired its transit peptide by a form of exon shuffling. Surprisingly, phylogenetic analysis shows that rpl22 was transferred to the nucleus in a common ancestor of all flowering plants, at least 100 million years preceding its loss from the legume chloroplast lineage.     

The Discriminatory Transfer Routes of tRNA Genes Among Organellar and Nuclear Genomes in Flowering Plants: A Genome-Wide Investigation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">indica</Emphasis> Rice

The transfer and integration of tRNA genes from organellar genomes to the nuclear genome and between organellar genomes occur extensively in flowering plants. The routes of the genetic materials flowing from one genome to another are biased, limited largely by compatibility of DNA replication and repair systems differing among the organelles and nucleus. After thoroughly surveying the tRNA gene transfer among organellar genomes and the nuclear genome of a domesticated rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica), we found that (i) 15 mitochondrial tRNA genes originate from the plastid; (ii) 43 and 80 nuclear tRNA genes are mitochondrion-like and plastid-like, respectively; and (iii) 32 nuclear tRNA genes have both mitochondrial and plastid counterparts. Besides the native (or genuine) tRNA gene sets, the nuclear genome contains organelle-like tRNA genes that make up a complete set of tRNA species capable of transferring all amino acids. More than 97% of these organelle-like nuclear tRNA genes flank organelle-like sequences over 20 bp. Nearly 40% of them colocalize with two or more other organelle-like tRNA genes. Twelve of the 15 plastid-like mitochondrial tRNA genes possess 5′- and 3′-flanking sequences over 20 bp, and they are highly similar to their plastid counterparts. Phylogenetic analyses of the migrated tRNA genes and their original copies suggest that intergenomic tRNA gene transfer is an ongoing process with noticeable discriminatory routes among genomes in flowering plants. Electronic Supplementary Material Electronic Supplementary material is available for this article at and accessible for authorised users. Reviewing Editor: Dr. David Guttman     

Reconstructing evolution: gene transfer from plastids to the nucleus

During evolution, the genomes of eukaryotic cells have undergone major restructuring to meet the new regulatory challenges associated with compartmentalization of the genetic material in the nucleus and the organelles acquired by endosymbiosis (mitochondria and plastids). Restructuring involved the loss of dispensable or redundant genes and the massive translocation of genes from the ancestral organelles to the nucleus. Genomics and bioinformatic data suggest that the process of DNA transfer from organelles to the nucleus still continues, providing raw material for evolutionary tinkering in the nuclear genome. Recent reconstruction of these events in the laboratory has provided a unique tool to observe genome evolution in real time and to study the molecular mechanisms by which plastid genes are converted into functional nuclear genes. Here, we summarize current knowledge about plastid-to-nuclear gene transfer in the context of genome evolution and discuss new insights gained from experiments that recapitulate endosymbiotic gene transfer in the laboratory.     

A cyanobacterial gene in nonphotosynthetic protists--an early chloroplast acquisition in eukaryotes?

Since the incorporation of mitochondria and chloroplasts (plastids) into the eukaryotic cell by endosymbiosis, genes have been transferred from the organellar genomes to the nucleus of the host, via an ongoing process known as endosymbiotic gene transfer. Accordingly, in photosynthetic eukaryotes, nuclear genes with cyanobacterial affinity are believed to have originated from endosymbiotic gene transfer from chloroplasts. Analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome has shown that a significant fraction (2%-9%) of the nuclear genes have such an endosymbiotic origin. Recently, it was argued that 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (gnd)-the second enzyme in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway-was one such example. Here we show that gnd genes with cyanobacterial affinity also are present in several nonphotosynthetic protistan lineages, such as Heterolobosea, Apicomplexa, and parasitic Heterokonta. Current data cannot definitively resolve whether these groups acquired the gnd gene by primary and/or secondary endosymbiosis or via an independent lateral gene transfer event. Nevertheless, our data suggest that chloroplasts were introduced into eukaryotes much earlier than previously thought and that several major groups of heterotrophic eukaryotes have secondarily lost photosynthetic plastids.     

An ancient horizontal gene transfer between mosquito and the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia pipientis

The extent and biological relevance of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in eukaryotic evolution remain highly controversial. Recent studies have demonstrated frequent and large-scale HGT from endosymbiotic bacteria to their hosts, but the great majority of these transferred genes rapidly become nonfunctional in the recipient genome. Here, we investigate an ancient HGT between a host metazoan and an endosymbiotic bacterium, Wolbachia pipientis. The transferred gene has so far been found only in mosquitoes and Wolbachia. In mosquitoes, it is a member of a gene family encoding candidate receptors required for malaria sporozoite invasion of the mosquito salivary gland. The gene copy in Wolbachia has substantially diverged in sequence from the mosquito homolog, is evolving under purifying selection, and is expressed, suggesting that this gene is also functional in the bacterial genome. Several lines of evidence indicate that the gene may have been transferred from eukaryotic host to bacterial endosymbiont. Regardless of the direction of transfer, however, these results demonstrate that interdomain HGT may give rise to functional, persistent, and possibly evolutionarily significant new genes.     

Pervasive migration of organellar DNA to the nucleus in plants

A surprisingly large number of plant nuclear DNA sequences inferred to be remnants of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA migration events were detected through computer-assisted database searches. Nineteen independent organellar DNA insertions, with a median size of 117 by (range of 38 to >785 bp), occur in the proximity of 15 nuclear genes. One fragment appears to have been passed through a RNA intermediate, based on the presence of an edited version of the mitochondrial gene in the nucleus. Tandemly arranged fragments from disparate regions of organellar genomes and from different organellar genomes indicate that the fragments joined together from an intracellular pool of RNA and/or DNA before they integrated into the nuclear genome. Comparisons of integrated sequences to genes lacking the insertions, as well as the occurrence of coligated fragments, support a model of random integration by end joining. All transferred sequences were found in noncoding regions, but the positioning of organellar-derived DNA in introns, as well as regions 5 and 3 to nuclear genes, suggests that the random integration of organellar DNA has the potential to influence gene expression patterns. A semiquantitative estimate was performed on the amount of organellar DNA being transferred and assimilated into the nucleus. Based on this database survey, we estimate that 3–7% of the plant nuclear genomic sequence files contain organellar-derived DNA. The timing and the magnitude of genetic flux to the nuclear genome suggest that random integration is a substantial and ongoing process for creating sequence variation.Correspondence to: J.L. Blanchard     

A functional bacteria-derived restriction modification system in the mitochondrion of a heterotrophic protist

The overarching trend in mitochondrial genome evolution is functional streamlining coupled with gene loss. Therefore, gene acquisition by mitochondria is considered to be exceedingly rare. Selfish elements in the form of self-splicing introns occur in many organellar genomes, but the wider diversity of selfish elements, and how they persist in the DNA of organelles, has not been explored. In the mitochondrial genome of a marine heterotrophic katablepharid protist, we identify a functional type II restriction modification (RM) system originating from a horizontal gene transfer (HGT) event involving bacteria related to flavobacteria. This RM system consists of an HpaII-like endonuclease and a cognate cytosine methyltransferase (CM). We demonstrate that these proteins are functional by heterologous expression in both bacterial and eukaryotic cells. These results suggest that a mitochondrion-encoded RM system can function as a toxin–antitoxin selfish element, and that such elements could be co-opted by eukaryotic genomes to drive biased organellar inheritance.

This study reveals that a functional type II restriction modification system of flavobacterial ancestry has been horizontally transferred into the mitochondrion of a marine protist and is capable of encoding potent function, perhaps allowing it to play a role in inter-organellar warfare or protection against further integration of foreign DNA.     

The origin and characterization of new nuclear genes originating from a cytoplasmic organellar genome

Endosymbiotic transfer of DNA and functional genes from the cytoplasmic organelles (mitochondria and chloroplasts) to the nucleus has been a major factor driving the origin of new nuclear genes, a process central to eukaryote evolution. Although organelle DNA transfers very frequently to the nucleus, most is quickly deleted, decays, or is alternatively scrapped. However, a very small proportion of it gives rise, immediately or eventually, to functional genes. To simulate the process of functional transfer, we screened for nuclear activation of a chloroplast reporter gene aadA, which had been transferred from the chloroplast to independent nuclear loci in 16 different plant lines. Cryptic nuclear activity of the chloroplast promoter was revealed, which became conspicuous when present in multiple nuclear copies. We screened ～50 million cells of each line and retrieved three plants in which aadA showed strong nuclear activation. Activation occurred by acquisition of the CaMV 35S nuclear promoter or by nuclear activation of the native chloroplast promoter. Two fortuitous sites within the 3' UTR of aadA mRNA both promoted polyadenylation without any sequence change. Complete characterization of one nuclear sequence before and after gene transfer demonstrated integration by nonhomologous end joining involving simultaneous insertion of multiple chloroplast DNA fragments. The real-time observation of three different means by which a chloroplast gene can become expressed in the nucleus suggests that the process, though rare, may be more readily achieved than previously envisaged.     

Organellar genes: why do they end up in the nucleus?

Many mitochondrial and plastid proteins are derived from their bacterial endosymbiotic ancestors, but their genes now reside on nuclear chromosomes instead of remaining within the organelle. To become an active nuclear gene and return to the organelle as a functional protein, an organellar gene must first be assimilated into the nuclear genome. The gene must then be transcribed and acquire a transit sequence for targeting the protein back to the organelle. On reaching the organelle, the protein must be properly folded and modified, and in many cases assembled in an orderly manner into a larger protein complex. Finally, the nuclear copy must be properly regulated to achieve a fitness level comparable with the organellar gene. Given the complexity in establishing a nuclear copy, why do organellar genes end up in the nucleus? Recent data suggest that these genes are worse off than their nuclear and free-living counterparts because of a reduction in the efficiency of natural selection, but do these population-genetic processes drive the movement of genes to the nucleus? We are now at a stage where we can begin to discriminate between competing hypotheses using a combination of experimental, natural population, bioinformatic and theoretical approaches.     

Gene duplication,transfer, and evolution in the chloroplast genome

In addition to the nuclear genome, organisms have organelle genomes. Most of the DNA present in eukaryotic organisms is located in the cell nucleus. Chloroplasts have independent genomes which are inherited from the mother. Duplicated genes are common in the genomes of all organisms. It is believed that gene duplication is the most important step for the origin of genetic variation, leading to the creation of new genes and new gene functions. Despite the fact that extensive gene duplications are rare among the chloroplast genome, gene duplication in the chloroplast genome is an essential source of new genetic functions and a mechanism of neo-evolution. The events of gene transfer between the chloroplast genome and nuclear genome via duplication and subsequent recombination are important processes in evolution. The duplicated gene or genome in the nucleus has been the subject of several recent reviews. In this review, we will briefly summarize gene duplication and evolution in the chloroplast genome. Also, we will provide an overview of gene transfer events between chloroplast and nuclear genomes.     

Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus

Mitochondrial gene content is highly variable across extant eukaryotes. The number of mitochondrial protein genes varies from 3 to 67, while tRNA gene content varies from 0 to 27. Moreover, these numbers exclude the many diverse lineages of non-respiring eukaryotes that lack a mitochondrial genome yet still contain a mitochondrion, albeit one often highly derived in ultrastructure and metabolic function, such as the hydrogenosome. Diversity in tRNA gene content primarily reflects differential usage of imported tRNAs of nuclear origin. In the case of protein genes, most of this diversity reflects differential degrees of functional gene transfer to the nucleus, with more minor contributions resulting from gene loss from the cell as a consequence of either substitution via a functional nuclear homolog or the cell's dispensation of the function of the gene product. The tempo and pattern of mitochondrial gene loss is highly episodic, both across the broad sweep of eukaryotes and within such well-studied groups as angiosperms. All animals, some plants, and certain other groups of eukaryotes are mired in profound stases in mitochondrial gene content, whereas other lineages have experienced relatively frequent gene loss. Loss and transfer to the nucleus of ribosomal protein and succinate dehydrogenase genes has been especially frequent, sporadic, and episodic during angiosperm evolution. Potential mechanisms for activation of transferred genes have been inferred, and intermediate stages in the process have been identified by comparative studies. Several hypotheses have been proposed for why mitochondrial genes are transferred to the nucleus, why mitochondria retain genomes, and why functional gene transfer is almost exclusively unidirectional.     

The parasitic bacterium Wolbachia and the origin of the eukaryotic cell

The acquisition of endosymbiotic alphaproteobacteria that gave rise to mitochondria was one of the key events in the origin of eukaryotic cell. To reconstruct this process, it is important to analyze relationships that developed later between eukaryotes and other alphaproteobacteria. Wolbachia pipientis, a bacterium that inhabits cells of numerous terrestrial invertebrates and exerts diverse effects on its hosts, is used as a model. Although Wolbachia is similar to mitochondria in many important features (basic metabolism, small molecule membrane transport, envelope structure, etc.), their relationships with the nucleocytoplasm are different. Mitochondria import most of their required proteins from the nucleocytoplasm and are controlled by the nucleocytoplasmic regulatory systems. On the contrary, Wolbachia exports its proteins into the host’s cytoplasm, thus causing dramatic aberrations in the ontogeny and reproduction of the host. This difference may be due to the fact that most of the protomitochondrial genes had been transferred into the central (nuclear) genome at the early stages of the development of the endosymbiotic system, while Wolbachia genes were not transferred into the nucleus. This fits well with the previously suggested hypothesis that there was a period of rapid lateral gene transfer in the evolution of proto-eukaryotes; the acquisition of mitochondria took place during this period. Later, eukaryotes, and especially metazoans, developed powerful mechanisms for prevention of lateral gene transfer. Therefore, the genes of the newly acquired endosymbionts cannot be transferred into the central genome, and the endosymbionts retain the capacity for selfish evolution.     

Forces maintaining organellar genomes: is any as strong as genetic code disparity or hydrophobicity?

It remains controversial why mitochondria and chloroplasts retain the genes encoding a small subset of their constituent proteins, despite the transfer of so many other genes to the nucleus. Two candidate obstacles to gene transfer, suggested long ago, are that the genetic code of some mitochondrial genomes differs from the standard nuclear code, such that a transferred gene would encode an incorrect amino acid sequence, and that the proteins most frequently encoded in mitochondria are generally very hydrophobic, which may impede their import after synthesis in the cytosol. More recently it has been suggested that both these interpretations suffer from serious "false positives" and "false negatives": genes that they predict should be readily transferred but which have never (or seldom) been, and genes whose transfer has occurred often or early, even though this is predicted to be very difficult. Here I consider the full known range of ostensibly problematic such genes, with particular reference to the sequences of events that could have led to their present location. I show that this detailed analysis of these cases reveals that they are in fact wholly consistent with the hypothesis that code disparity and hydrophobicity are much more powerful barriers to functional gene transfer than any other. The popularity of the contrary view has led to the search for other barriers that might retain genes in organelles even more powerfully than code disparity or hydrophobicity; one proposal, concerning the role of proteins in redox processes, has received widespread support. I conclude that this abandonment of the original explanations for the retention of organellar genomes has been premature. Several other, relatively minor, obstacles to gene transfer certainly exist, contributing to the retention of relatively many organellar genes in most lineages compared to animal mtDNA, but there is no evidence for obstacles as severe as code disparity or hydrophobicity. One corollary of this conclusion is that there is currently no reason to suppose that engineering nuclear versions of the remaining mammalian mitochondrial genes, a feat that may have widespread biomedical relevance, should require anything other than sequence alterations obviating code disparity and causing modest reductions in hydrophobicity without loss of enzymatic function.     

Coordination of gene expression between organellar and nuclear genomes

Following the acquisition of chloroplasts and mitochondria by eukaryotic cells during endosymbiotic evolution, most of the genes in these organelles were either lost or transferred to the nucleus. Encoding organelle-destined proteins in the nucleus allows for host control of the organelle. In return, organelles send signals to the nucleus to coordinate nuclear and organellar activities. In photosynthetic eukaryotes, additional interactions exist between mitochondria and chloroplasts. Here we review recent advances in elucidating the intracellular signalling pathways that coordinate gene expression between organelles and the nucleus, with a focus on photosynthetic plants.     

Transfer of genetic material between the chloroplast and nucleus: how is it related to stress in plants?

Background

The presence of chloroplast-related DNA sequences in the nuclear genome is generally regarded as a relic of the process by which genes have been transferred from the chloroplast to the nucleus. The remaining chloroplast encoded genes are not identical across the plant kingdom indicating an ongoing transfer of genes from the organelle to the nucleus.

Scope

This review focuses on the active processes by which the nuclear genome might be acquiring or removing DNA sequences from the chloroplast genome. Present knowledge of the contribution to the nuclear genome of DNA originating from the chloroplast will be reviewed. In particular, the possible effects of stressful environments on the transfer of genetic material between the chloroplast and nucleus will be considered. The significance of this research and suggestions for the future research directions to identify drivers, such as stress, of the nuclear incorporation of plastid sequences are discussed.

Conclusions

The transfer to the nuclear genome of most of the protein-encoding functions for chloroplast-located proteins facilitates the control of gene expression. The continual transfer of fragments, including complete functional genes, from the chloroplast to the nucleus has been observed. However, the mechanisms by which the loss of functions and physical DNA elimination from the chloroplast genome following the transfer of those functions to the nucleus remains obscure. The frequency of polymorphism across chloroplast-related DNA fragments within a species will indicate the rate at which these DNA fragments are incorporated and removed from the chromosomes.Key words: Stress, DNA transfer, organelles and nucleus, genome integration     

Plastid DNA in the nucleus: New genes for old

Nuclear genomes of eukaryotes are bombarded by a continuous deluge of organellar DNA which contributes significantly to eukaryote evolution. Here, we present a new PCR-based method that allows the specific amplification of nuclear integrants of organellar DNA (norgs) by exploiting recent deletions present in organellar genome sequences. We have used this method to amplify nuclear integrants of plastid DNA (nupts) from the nuclear genomes of several nicotiana species and to study the evolutionary forces acting upon these sequences. The role of nupts in endosymbiotic evolution and the different genetic factors influencing the time available for a chloroplastic gene to be functionally relocated in the nucleus are discussed.