Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders

Breast reconstruction with expanders and implants provides an excellent option in the properly selected patient. Techniques for reconstruction have evolved significantly over the past 30 years with the development of more sophisticated devices and improvement in surgical procedures. Several options exist, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Two-stage breast reconstruction using a textured device with an anatomic shape and integrated valve seems to provide the most consistent and reproducible results in most patients. Those patients with small, minimally ptotic breasts may be candidates for either single-stage implant reconstruction or reconstruction with an adjustable device. Advantages of expander and implant reconstruction over other techniques include relative ease of the procedure; no distant donor-site morbidity; use of tissue of similar color, texture, and sensation; reduced operative time; and more rapid postoperative recovery.     

Late breast pain following reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants

Two patients of 56 who were reconstructed with polyurethane-coated implants developed breast pain as a late complication and eventually required implant removal for relief. Although the cause of pain was not proven, it may have been due to contracture of the fibrous capsule which formed between the polyurethane and the shell of the implant. The complication of late pain has not been stressed previously in the literature on reconstruction.     

Microbial growth in saline breast implants and saline tissue expanders

The subject of microbial growth within the saline medium of prosthetic breast implants has been one of great controversy in recent years. Although several articles have described microbial growth within the tissue surrounding implanted breast prostheses, few have attempted to determine the possibility of such contamination of the luminal saline. The authors studied the intraluminal saline medium of a series of explanted breast prostheses with the objective of identifying any microbial contamination. Over a 6-month period, a consecutive series of saline-filled breast implants and tissue expanders were removed from 37 patients. Under the supervision of a microbiologist, saline extracted from each implant was subjected to bacterial and fungal cultures, Gram staining, and acid-fast staining. A total of 24 saline-filled breast implants were removed from 15 patients, and 32 saline-filled tissue expanders were removed from 22 patients. The average length of implantation was 28.1 months for the implants and 7.1 months for the expanders. None of the saline within the implants or expanders within our series displayed any evidence of microbial contamination. These results suggest that microbial contamination of the luminal saline of prosthetic breast implants is an extremely unlikely event.     

Breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in Hodgkin's patients with prior mantle irradiation.

Women treated for Hodgkin's disease with mantle irradiation have an increased risk for developing breast cancer. Typically, breast malignancy in Hodgkin's patients presents bilaterally in a younger age group. Skin flap ischemia, poor skin expansion, implant extrusion, capsular contracture, and poor cosmesis are common sequelae of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction after breast irradiation for failed breast conservation therapy. This has led most surgeons to favor autologous tissue reconstruction in this setting. This study was performed to determine the efficacy of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients who have been treated with prior mantle irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. A retrospective analysis of all breast cancer patients with a history of Hodgkin's disease and mantle irradiation treated with mastectomy and tissue expander/implant reconstruction between 1992 and 1999 was performed. There were seven patients, with a mean age of 35 years (range, 28 to 42 years). The average interval between mantle irradiation and breast cancer diagnosis was 16 years (range, 12 to 23 years). All patients underwent two-stage reconstruction. Textured surface tissue expanders were placed in a complete submuscular position at the time of mastectomy. Expansion was initiated 2 weeks after insertion and continued on a weekly basis until completion. Expanders were replaced with textured surface saline-filled implants as a second stage. Patients were evaluated for skin flap ischemia, infection, quality of skin expansion, implant extrusion, capsular contracture, rippling, symmetry, and final aesthetic outcome. Breast cancer was bilateral in five patients and unilateral in two. Two patients did not undergo simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction because of metachronous cancer development. One of the patients had an initial transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction, followed by a tissue expander/implant reconstruction of the opposite breast. The average follow-up was 3 years. Complications were limited to one case of cellulitis after implant placement that resolved with intravenous antibiotics. There were no cases of skin flap ischemia, poor skin expansion, or implant extrusion. Overall patient satisfaction was high and revisions were not requested or required. Symmetry was best achieved with bilateral implants. This study demonstrates the efficacy of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in patients treated with prior mantle irradiation. In this series, tissue expansion was reliable with low morbidity. Second-stage placement of permanent implants yielded good aesthetic results without significant capsular contracture. Mantle irradiation did not appear to compromise the prosthetic breast reconstruction. Tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction should remain a viable option in this category of irradiated patients.     

Radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction with implants

The use of implants in immediate breast reconstruction is presently a common option. However, the practice should be evaluated in consideration of possible adjuvant therapies needed to control disease and to rule out negative interactions. This article discusses the effects of radiotherapy on breast implants with regard to the final cosmetic result. Six out of 124 cases of immediate breast reconstruction with implants were followed and evaluated in terms of capsular contracture and final aesthetic result after adjuvant radiotherapy and compared with the results of 118 patients who did not require irradiation. All of the patients who received irradiation demonstrated poor to fair results, with grade III to IV capsular contracture. Two patients received radiation therapy for local recurrences, which worsened their capsular contracture, emphasizing the deleterious effect of irradiation on breast implants. Statistical analysis of the results demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups in terms of capsular contracture and breast symmetry. In the selection of patient candidates for immediate breast reconstruction with implants, adjuvant radiation therapy must be considered as a contraindication, at least from an aesthetic point of view.     

Long-term complications of polyurethane-covered breast implants

The authors's personal experience using an earlier manufactured polyurethane-covered gel prosthesis is presented. Very long-term follow-up did not validate the author's initial enthusiasm. It is to be hoped that the newer polyurethane-covered implants will give more satisfactory long-term results.     

The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction.

The role of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction is well established. Little information exists, however, regarding the incidence and etiology of premature removal of the tissue expander before planned exchange to a permanent breast implant. The purpose of this study was to review our 10-year experience with tissue expander breast reconstruction and identify factors relating to the premature removal of the tissue expander. This study is a retrospective review of 770 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction with tissue expanders over the past 10 years. Breast reconstruction was immediate in 90 percent of patients. Patients were expanded weekly, and adjuvant chemotherapy was begun during the expansion process when required. Factors potentially affecting premature expander removal (chemotherapy, diabetes, obesity, radiation therapy, and smoking) were evaluated. Fourteen patients (1.8 percent) with a mean age of 47 years (range, 38 to 62 years) required premature removal of their tissue expander. Expanders were removed a mean of 3.2 months (0.1 to 8 months) after insertion. Causes for premature removal of the tissue expander included infection (7 patients), exposure (2), skin necrosis (2), patient dissatisfaction (2), and persistent breast cancer (1). Positive wound cultures were obtained in four of the seven infected patients (57 percent), requiring expander removal for infection. Tissue expanders were removed in 11 patients for complications directly related to the expander. Among these, six (55 percent) were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, and one was a smoker. Diabetes, obesity, other concomitant medical illnesses, and prior mantle irradiation were not associated with expander removal. Premature removal of the tissue expander was required in only 1.8 percent of the patients in this series. Infection was the most common complication necessitating an unplanned surgical procedure to remove the expander. This study demonstrates that the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction is reliable, with the vast majority of patients completing the expansion process.     

Local complications and subsequent symptom reporting among women with cosmetic breast implants

Epidemiologic studies have found no association between breast implants and cancer or well-defined connective tissue diseases. However, women with cosmetic breast implants continue to report specific as well as nonspecific physical and psychological symptoms after receiving their implants. In an attempt to determine whether local complications of implantation may contribute to this excess of symptom reporting, the authors studied a large cohort of women in Sweden with cosmetic breast implants (n = 1280) and a comparison cohort of women who had cosmetic breast reduction surgery (n = 2211). Both groups of women had operations between 1969 and 1996. Medical record reviews of local complications revealed that approximately 31 percent of the women with cosmetic breast implants had an implant change, implant leakage, or a capsulotomy. Capsulotomies occurred more often in women who were age 35 or older at the time of the operation, had ever smoked, and had implants with a smooth surface. On self-administered questionnaires, symptoms were reported more often by the women who had implants regardless of whether they had local complications. Twenty of the 28 symptoms occurred more frequently among women with local complications and breast implants, compared with the women in the breast reduction comparison group or the women with breast implants but no local complications. This study suggests that local complications, particularly capsular contractures as indicated by capsulotomy, may be an important factor to consider when studying symptom reporting among women with breast implants.     

Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications

A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience with 40 consecutive patients who had undergone two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstruction and radiation during the period from 1990 through 1997. A randomly selected group of 40 other two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstructions from the same surgeon and time period served as controls. This review was undertaken because of the absence of specific information on the outcome of staged saline implant reconstructions in the radiated breast. Previously published reports on silicone gel implants and radiation have been contradictory. At the same time, the criteria for the use of radiation in the treatment of breast cancer have been expanded and the numbers of reconstruction patients who have been radiated are increasing dramatically. For example, in a 1985 report on immediate breast reconstruction, only 1 of 185 patients over a 6-year period underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas in this review, there were 40 radiated breasts with saline-filled implants, 19 of which received adjuvant radiation therapy during their expansion. The study parameters included patient age, breast cup size, implant size, length of follow-up, number of procedures, coincident flap operations, Baker classification, complications, opposite breast procedures, pathologic stage, indications for and details about the radiation, and outcomes. The use of radiation in this review of reconstructed breasts can logically be divided into four groups: previous lumpectomy and radiation (n = 7), mastectomy and radiation before reconstruction (n = 9), mastectomy and adjuvant radiation during reconstruction/expansion (n = 19), and radiation after reconstruction (n = 5). The largest and most rapidly growing group of patients is of those receiving postmastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 47.5 percent (19 of 40) of radiated breasts with saline implants ultimately needed the addition of, or replacement by, a flap. Ten percent of a control group with nonradiated saline implant reconstructions also had flaps, none as replacements. Fifty percent or more of both the radiated and control groups had contralateral surgery. Complications were far more common in the radiated group; for example, there were 32.5 percent capsular contractures compared with none in the control group. The control nonradiated implant-only group and the flap plus implant radiated group did well cosmetically. The radiated implant-only group was judged the worst. The increasing use of radiation after mastectomy has important implications for breast reconstruction. The possibility for radiation should be thoroughly investigated and anticipated preoperatively before immediate breast reconstruction. Patients with invasive disease, particularly with large tumors or palpable axillary lymph nodes, are especially likely to be encouraged to undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy. The indications for adjuvant radiation therapy have included four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, tumors 4 cm (or more) in diameter, and tumors at or near the margin of resection. More recently, some centers are recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with as few as one positive lymph node or even in situ carcinoma close to the resection margin. The use of latissimus dorsi flaps after radiation has proven to be an excellent solution to postradiation tissue contracture, which can occur during breast expander reconstruction. The use of the latissimus flap electively with skin-sparing mastectomy preradiation is probably unwise, unless postmastectomy radiation is unlikely. Skin-sparing mastectomy with a latissimus flap thus should be preserved for patients unlikely to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy. Purely autologous reconstruction such as a TRAM flap is another option for these patients, either before or after radiation therapy.