Diagnóstico microbiológico de las micosis invasoras

The prognosis of invasive fungal infections (IFI) depends on the speed of diagnosis and treatment. Conventional diagnostic methods are of low sensitivity, laborious and too slow, leading to the need for new, faster, and more efficient diagnostic strategies.There are several techniques for diagnosing a candidemia that are faster than the conventional blood culture (BC). Once yeast growth in BC is detected, species identification can be speeded up by mass spectrometry (30 minutes), commercialised molecular techniques (60-80 minutes) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (90 minutes). The combined detection of biomarkers (antimicellium, mannan and anti-mannan or β-glucan) has shown to be of greater use than their individual use. Commercialised nucleic acid amplification techniques (Septifast®, T2Candida®) are very reliable alternatives to BC. The detection of the capsular antigen of Cryptococcus, by means of latex agglutination or immuno-chromatography, is a valuable technique for cryptococcosis diagnosis.Direct microscopic examination and culture of representative specimens is used for the conventional diagnosis of IFI by filamentous fungi. Detection of galactomannan and β-glucan are considered diagnostic criteria for probable invasive aspergillosis and probable IFI, respectively, despite the lack of specificity of the latter. The detection of fungal volatile organic compounds in breath is an interesting diagnostic strategy in pulmonary infections. Although widely used, nucleic acid detection techniques are not considered diagnostic criteria for IFIs caused by moulds in consensus documents, due to their lack of standardisation. However, they are the only alternative to culture methods in invasive infections by Scedosporium/Lomentospora, Fusarium, zygomycetes, or dematiaceous fungi.     

Napromienianie dwa razy dziennie podwyższoną dawką frakcyjną chorych z przerzutami nowotworów złośliwych do mózgu. Wyniki końcowe prospektywnego badania klinicznego w nierandomizowanej grupie chorych

AimTo evaluate the morbidity and effectivness of twice a day hypofractionation in patients with brain metastases.Material / methodsBetween 1992 and 2000, 116 patients with brain metastases have been treated with whole brain radiotherapy alone and only in 33 patients radiotherapy was applied as adjuvant treatment after surgery. Radiotherapy was given in two of 3 Gy fractions daily with minimum 6 hours intervals between fractions to total dose of 39 Gy. Mean age of treated patients was 55 years. All patients were in general performance status evaluated according to the Karnofsky Performance Scale of at least 50.ResultsEarly tolerance of treatment was acceptable. Of 116 patients only 20 patients were treated with supportive treatment (anti-oedema drugs). Improvement of the neurological status was obtained in 26 patients (22%). The one-year overall survival was 21%. The one–year survival without clinical progression of disease was observed in 10% of all treated patients. Patients with solitary brain metastases treated with surgery and radiotherapy showed the best results.ConclusionsOur results showed that twice a day hypo-fractionation radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases is well tolerated and may provides benefit.     

Valoración de la utilidad del test de estimulación intraarterial con calcio en el diagnóstico de localización del hiperinsulinismo endógeno

Background and objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the utility of arterial calcium stimulation with hepatic venous sampling (ASVS) in the localization of tumors in patients with endogenous hyperinsulinism not detected with other methods.Patients and methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 26 patients admitted to our hospital for hypoglycemia who underwent ASVS because the source of hyperinsulinism was not clearly identified by other imaging techniques. The histopathological result in patients who underwent a surgical procedure was considered the reference for statistical study of the accuracy of this technique. Statistical analysis was performed by comparing proportions with the chi-squared test with Yates’ correction for contingency tables, and Cohen′s kappa coefficient as a measure of interrater agreement between two observations.ResultsSurgery was performed in 17 patients, 13 with positive ASVS and the remaining four with negative results. An insulinoma was removed in 12 patients, and 10 of these were detected in the ASVS. A total of 76.9 % of positive ASVS tests corresponded to a histological diagnosis of insulinoma, and 83% of these insulinomas were positive in ASVS. This association was statistically significant (chi cuadrado = 7.340; p = 0.012). Two of three patients with nesidioblastosis had a positive response in the ASVS. A good and statistically significant agreement was obtained between histopathologic diagnosis and ASVS results (κ=0.556, p = 0.007).ConclusionsASVS is a useful procedure in the localization diagnosis of endogenous hyperinsulinism not detected by other imaging tests. This technique allows tumors in the pancreatic gland to be identified and may be useful in the choice of the surgical technique to be used.     

Evaluación de la realización del cribado del pie diabético en Atención Primaria

AimTo ascertain whether patients with type 2 diabetes are screened for diabetic foot, and to analyze the factors related to patients and centers associated to performance of such screening.Material and methodsA multicenter, epidemiological, cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinical records of 443 patients with type 2 diabetes monitored at Primary Care for at least 12 months were reviewed. Demographic and healthcare variables and characteristics of the primary care center were recorded.ResultsIn the previous year, 51.2% of patients had been trained on foot self-care, 56.4% had undergone foot inspection, 39.5% had been examined with a monofilament, and palpation of peripheral pulses and measurement of the ankle-brachial index were performed in 45.8 and 10.1% of patients, respectively. Diabetic foot screening (inspection, monofilament testing, and palpation of peripheral pulses) was performed in 37% of study patients. Ulcer risk stratification was done in 12.4% of patients. A significant association was found between diabetic foot screening and presence of foot deformities (P < .001), history of neuropathy (P = .005), and history of peripheral artery disease (P < .05). Screening was also associated to some characteristics of the center, such as reception of information about goal achievement (P < .001) and economic incentives for goal attainment (P < .001).ConclusionsCompliance with diabetic foot screening and ulcer risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes in Primary Care was poor.