SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions

Structure chromosome (SMC) proteins organize the core of cohesin, condensin and Smc5-Smc6 complexes. The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required for DNA repair, as well as having another essential but enigmatic function. Here, we generated conditional mutants of SMC5 and SMC6 in budding yeast, in which the essential function was affected. We show that mutant smc5-6 and smc6-9 cells undergo an aberrant mitosis in which chromosome segregation of repetitive regions is impaired; this leads to DNA damage and RAD9-dependent activation of the Rad53 protein kinase. Consistent with a requirement for the segregation of repetitive regions, Smc5 and Smc6 proteins are enriched at ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and at some telomeres. We show that, following Smc5-Smc6 inactivation, metaphase-arrested cells show increased levels of X-shaped DNA (Holliday junctions) at the rDNA locus. Furthermore, deletion of RAD52 partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of smc5-6 and smc6-9 mutants. We also present evidence showing that the rDNA segregation defects of smc5/smc6 mutants are mechanistically different from those previously observed for condensin mutants. These results point towards a role for the Smc5-Smc6 complex in preventing the formation of sister chromatid junctions, thereby ensuring the correct partitioning of chromosomes during anaphase.     

Smc5/6 Coordinates Formation and Resolution of Joint Molecules with Chromosome Morphology to Ensure Meiotic Divisions

During meiosis, Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) complexes underpin two fundamental features of meiosis: homologous recombination and chromosome segregation. While meiotic functions of the cohesin and condensin complexes have been delineated, the role of the third SMC complex, Smc5/6, remains enigmatic. Here we identify specific, essential meiotic functions for the Smc5/6 complex in homologous recombination and the regulation of cohesin. We show that Smc5/6 is enriched at centromeres and cohesin-association sites where it regulates sister-chromatid cohesion and the timely removal of cohesin from chromosomal arms, respectively. Smc5/6 also localizes to recombination hotspots, where it promotes normal formation and resolution of a subset of joint-molecule intermediates. In this regard, Smc5/6 functions independently of the major crossover pathway defined by the MutLγ complex. Furthermore, we show that Smc5/6 is required for stable chromosomal localization of the XPF-family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4^Eme1. Our data suggest that the Smc5/6 complex is required for specific recombination and chromosomal processes throughout meiosis and that in its absence, attempts at cell division with unresolved joint molecules and residual cohesin lead to severe recombination-induced meiotic catastrophe.     

The SMC-5/6 Complex and the HIM-6 (BLM) Helicase Synergistically Promote Meiotic Recombination Intermediate Processing and Chromosome Maturation during Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis

Meiotic recombination is essential for the repair of programmed double strand breaks (DSBs) to generate crossovers (COs) during meiosis. The efficient processing of meiotic recombination intermediates not only needs various resolvases but also requires proper meiotic chromosome structure. The Smc5/6 complex belongs to the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) family and is closely related to cohesin and condensin. Although the Smc5/6 complex has been implicated in the processing of recombination intermediates during meiosis, it is not known how Smc5/6 controls meiotic DSB repair. Here, using Caenorhabditis elegans we show that the SMC-5/6 complex acts synergistically with HIM-6, an ortholog of the human Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM) during meiotic recombination. The concerted action of the SMC-5/6 complex and HIM-6 is important for processing recombination intermediates, CO regulation and bivalent maturation. Careful examination of meiotic chromosomal morphology reveals an accumulation of inter-chromosomal bridges in smc-5; him-6 double mutants, leading to compromised chromosome segregation during meiotic cell divisions. Interestingly, we found that the lethality of smc-5; him-6 can be rescued by loss of the conserved BRCA1 ortholog BRC-1. Furthermore, the combined deletion of smc-5 and him-6 leads to an irregular distribution of condensin and to chromosome decondensation defects reminiscent of condensin depletion. Lethality conferred by condensin depletion can also be rescued by BRC-1 depletion. Our results suggest that SMC-5/6 and HIM-6 can synergistically regulate recombination intermediate metabolism and suppress ectopic recombination by controlling chromosome architecture during meiosis.     

H2A.Z-Dependent Regulation of Cohesin Dynamics on Chromosome Arms

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes and DNA topoisomerases are major determinants of chromosome structure and dynamics. The cohesin complex embraces sister chromatids throughout interphase, but during mitosis most cohesin is stripped from chromosome arms by early prophase, while the remaining cohesin at kinetochores is cleaved at anaphase. This two-step removal of cohesin is required for sister chromatids to separate. The cohesin-related Smc5/6 complex has been studied mostly as a determinant of DNA repair via homologous recombination. However, chromosome segregation fails in Smc5/6 null mutants or cells treated with small interfering RNAs. This also occurs in Smc5/6 hypomorphs in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe following genotoxic and replication stress, or topoisomerase II dysfunction, and these mitotic defects are due to the postanaphase retention of cohesin on chromosome arms. Here we show that mitotic and repair roles for Smc5/6 are genetically separable in S. pombe. Further, we identified the histone variant H2A.Z as a critical factor to modulate cohesin dynamics, and cells lacking H2A.Z suppress the mitotic defects conferred by Smc5/6 dysfunction. Together, H2A.Z and the SMC complexes ensure genome integrity through accurate chromosome segregation.     

Nse1, Nse2, and a novel subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, Nse3, play a crucial role in meiosis

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family of proteins play key roles in the organization, packaging, and repair of chromosomes. Cohesin (Smc1+3) holds replicated sister chromatids together until mitosis, condensin (Smc2+4) acts in chromosome condensation, and Smc5+6 performs currently enigmatic roles in DNA repair and chromatin structure. The SMC heterodimers must associate with non-SMC subunits to perform their functions. Using both biochemical and genetic methods, we have isolated a novel subunit of the Smc5+6 complex, Nse3. Nse3 is an essential nuclear protein that is required for normal mitotic chromosome segregation and cellular resistance to a number of genotoxic agents. Epistasis with Rhp51 (Rad51) suggests that like Smc5+6, Nse3 functions in the homologous recombination based repair of DNA damage. We previously identified two non-SMC subunits of Smc5+6 called Nse1 and Nse2. Analysis of nse1-1, nse2-1, and nse3-1 mutants demonstrates that they are crucial for meiosis. The Nse1 mutant displays meiotic DNA segregation and homologous recombination defects. Spore viability is reduced by nse2-1 and nse3-1, without affecting interhomolog recombination. Finally, genetic interactions shared by the nse mutants suggest that the Smc5+6 complex is important for replication fork stability.     

Smc5-Smc6 Complex Preserves Nucleolar Integrity in S. cerevisiae

As a baton in a relay race, intact genomes need to be smoothly passed onto daughter cells every cell generation. Cohesin and condensin are multiprotein complexes involved in chromosome segregation during mitosis, they perform the crucial function of organizing and compacting chromosomes into pairs to facilitate their equal distribution in anaphase. Both complexes share a core of similar origin, containing a heterodimer formed by members of the conserved chromosomal ATPase family named Smc. A third complex containing Smc proteins at its core, the Smc5-Smc6 complex, previously known to be involved in DNA repair has recently been shown to contribute to chromosome segregation during anaphase. Smc5-Smc6 plays a role in the disjunction of repetitive regions. Here, we present results further supporting the importance of Smc5-Smc6 in maintaining the integrity of the repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus, the largest repetitive region of the budding yeast genome.     

Chromosome morphogenesis: condensin-dependent cohesin removal during meiosis

During meiosis, segregation of homologous chromosomes necessitates the coordination of sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and recombination. Cohesion and condensation require the SMC complexes, cohesin and condensin, respectively. Here we use budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to show that condensin and Cdc5, a Polo-like kinase, facilitate the removal of cohesin from chromosomes prior to the onset of anaphase I when homologs segregate. This cohesin removal is critical for homolog segregation because it helps dissolve the recombination-dependent links between homologs that form during prophase I. Condensin enhances the association of Cdc5 with chromosomes and its phosphorylation of cohesin, which in turn likely stimulates cohesin removal. Condensin/Cdc5-dependent removal of cohesin underscores the potential importance of crosstalk between chromosome structural components in chromosome morphogenesis and provides a mechanism to couple chromosome morphogenesis with other meiotic events.     

Functional interplay between cohesin and Smc5/6 complexes

Chromosomes are subjected to massive reengineering as they are replicated, transcribed, repaired, condensed, and segregated into daughter cells. Among the engineers are three large protein complexes collectively known as the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes: cohesin, condensin, and Smc5/6. As their names suggest, cohesin controls sister chromatid cohesion, condensin controls chromosome condensation, and while precise functions for Smc5/6 have remained somewhat elusive, most reports have focused on the control of recombinational DNA repair. Here, we focus on cohesin and Smc5/6 function. It is becoming increasingly clear that the functional repertoires of these complexes are greater than sister chromatid cohesion and recombination. These SMC complexes are emerging as interrelated and cooperating factors that control chromosome dynamics throughout interphase. However, they also release their embrace of sister chromatids to enable their segregation at anaphase, resetting the dynamic cycle of SMC-chromosome interactions.     

Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions

The production of haploid gametes from diploid germ cells requires two rounds of meiotic chromosome segregation after one round of replication. Accurate meiotic chromosome segregation involves the remodeling of each pair of homologous chromosomes around the site of crossover into a highly condensed and ordered structure. We showed that condensin, the protein complex needed for mitotic chromosome compaction, restructures chromosomes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. In particular, condensin promotes both meiotic chromosome condensation after crossover recombination and the remodeling of sister chromatids. Condensin helps resolve cohesin-independent linkages between sister chromatids and alleviates recombination-independent linkages between homologues. The safeguarding of chromosome resolution by condensin permits chromosome segregation and is crucial for the formation of discrete, individualized bivalent chromosomes.     

Rad50 is involved in MMS-induced recombination between homologous chromosomes in mitotic cells

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family proteins (Smc1-Smc6) typically consist of two coiled-coil domains, an amino-terminal head domain, and a carboxyl-terminal tail domain. Rad50, a component of the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex, has a similar domain structure to the SMC proteins. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the MRX complex appears to be essential for recombination between homologous chromosomes in meiotic cells, but not in cells undergoing vegetative growth. Here we provide for the first time evidence that Rad50, like Smc6, is required for the induction of recombination between homologous chromosomes in cells in the vegetative growth state upon exposure to methyl methanesulfonate. However, UV-induced recombination between homologous chromosomes is intact in both rad50 and smc6-56 mutant cells.     

SMC complexes and topoisomerase II work together so that sister chromatids can work apart

The pairing of sister chromatids in interphase facilitates error-free homologous recombination (HR). Sister chromatids are held together by cohesin, one of three Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes. In mitosis, chromosome condensation is controlled by another SMC complex, condensin, and the type II topoisomerase (Top2). In prophase, cohesin is stripped from chromosome arms, but remains at centromeres until anaphase, whereupon it is removed via proteolytic cleavage. The third SMC complex, Smc5/6, is generally described as a regulator of HR-mediated DNA repair. However, cohesin and condensin are also required for DNA repair, and HR genes are not essential for cell viability, but the SMC complexes are. Smc5/6 null mutants die in mitosis, and in fission yeast, Smc5/6 hypomorphs show lethal mitoses following genotoxic stress, or when combined with a Top2 mutant, top2-191. We found these mitotic defects are due to retention of cohesin on chromosome arms. We also show that Top2 functions in the cohesin cycle, and accumulating data suggests this is not related to its decatenation activity. Thus the SMC complexes and Top2 functionally interact, and any DNA repair function ascribed to Smc5/6 is likely a reflection of a more fundamental role in the regulation of chromosome structure.     

Smc5-Smc6-Dependent Removal of Cohesin from Mitotic Chromosomes

The function of the essential cohesin-related Smc5-Smc6 complex has remained elusive, though hypomorphic mutants have defects late in recombination, in checkpoint maintenance, and in chromosome segregation. Recombination and checkpoints are not essential for viability, and Smc5-Smc6-null mutants die in lethal mitoses. This suggests that the chromosome segregation defects may be the source of lethality in irradiated Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphs. We show that in smc6 mutants, following DNA damage in interphase, chromosome arm segregation fails due to an aberrant persistence of cohesin, which is normally removed by the Separase-independent pathway. This postanaphase persistence of cohesin is not dependent on DNA damage, since the synthetic lethality of smc6 hypomorphs with a topoisomerase II mutant, defective in mitotic chromosome structure, is also due to the retention of cohesin on undamaged chromosome arms. In both cases, Separase overexpression bypasses the defect and restores cell viability, showing that defective cohesin removal is a major determinant of the mitotic lethality of Smc5-Smc6 mutants.Three essential SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complexes control chromosome dynamics: condensin, cohesin, and the Smc5-Smc6 complex (37). They are composed of SMC heterodimers: Smc2 and -4 in condensin, Smc1 and -3 in cohesin, and Smc5 and -6 in Smc5-Smc6. These are large ATPases with globular N and C termini, which are separated by long coiled-coil domains. The termini interact through an ABC-like coordination of ATP through Walker A and B motifs, with the coiled-coils bending at a flexible “hinge” that acts as the SMC dimerization domain. Each complex contains a number of unique non-Smc subunits, which are likely to contribute to its unique function. Among these is a kleisin subunit, which interacts with both the SMC subunits, closing a potential ring-shaped structure (55, 61).Condensin is localized to chromosomes primarily during mitosis and is essential for mitotic chromosome condensation. Conversely, cohesin is localized primarily to interphase chromosomes and has been postulated to form a ring-shaped structure around sister chromatids to ensure their cohesion, which is important for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). As its name suggests, the function of the Smc5-Smc6 complex is relatively poorly understood.Scc2/4 loads cohesin onto chromosomes in G₁, and sister chromatid cohesion is established during replication via the action of the acetyltransferase Eco1. Cohesin must be removed before chromosome segregation, where cleavage of the kleisin subunit Scc1 by the protease Separase is critical (51). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Separase-mediated Scc1 cleavage is essential for the removal of cohesin from all loci. In mammals, most cohesin is removed from chromosome arms early in mitosis in a Separase-independent process regulated by cohesin phosphorylation (28, 76). At anaphase, Separase-dependent removal of cohesin at the kinetochores ensures sister chromatid separation. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cohesin is thought to be regulated in a manner similar to that in mammals; only a small fraction of the Scc1 homolog Rad21 is cleaved by Separase (70), suggesting that most cohesin is removed by a Separase-independent mechanism.Cohesin-mediated sister chromatid cohesion is required for HR (64). Cohesin is recruited to double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) (66) and enforces cohesion genome wide after DNA damage in S. cerevisiae (65, 74). The acetyltransferase activity of Eco1 is essential for genomewide damage-induced cohesion, acting via the acetylation of Smc3 (6, 73, 81). In human cells, small interfering RNA (siRNA) studies have suggested a requirement for Smc5-Smc6 to recruit cohesin to DSBs (57), but this is not the case in S. cerevisiae (65), so the functional relationship between these related complexes also remains to be determined.In S. cerevisiae, Smc5-Smc6 is loaded onto chromatin by the cohesin loader Scc2/4 at loci that overlap with cohesin, including at DSBs (36). Smc5-Smc6-null mutants of S. pombe die in aberrant mitoses (27, 75), though the cause of this is unknown. Genetic analyses of Smc5-Smc6 in these yeasts have focused on its role in DNA repair by utilizing viable hypomorphic mutants that are highly sensitive to DNA damage. Studies with two hypomorphic smc6 mutants, bearing the smc6-X and smc6-74 mutations, have shown that Smc5-Smc6 is required for a late stage of HR subsequent to the recruitment of the Rad51/Rad52 recombination proteins and the formation of recombination intermediates (2). smc6-74 is a mutation (A151T) in the arginine finger motif of the N-terminal globular domain, while smc6-X is a mutation (R706C) in the hinge domain. Overexpression of Brc1, a multi-BRCT domain protein, suppresses the DNA damage sensitivities of several Smc5-Smc6 mutants but does not suppress smc6-X (45, 75). smc6-74 mutants, but not smc6-X mutants, are also defective in an early response to replication fork stalling, involving the recruitment of Rad52 but not Rad51 (30).As with cohesin, the HR defects in Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphic mutants are likely to result from a more general role in chromosome organization than acting as a recombinase. Smc5-Smc6 is required for HR following irradiation or recovery from hydroxyurea (HU)-induced replication arrest (2, 18, 27, 34, 35, 71, 75). However, in contrast to the sustained checkpoint arrest of irradiated HR mutants, S. pombe Smc5-Smc6 hypomorphs, such as that with the smc6-74 mutation, enter highly aberrant mitoses following DNA damage. For DSBs induced by ionizing radiation, smc6 mutants progress into mitosis with wild-type kinetics, but, as shown by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the chromosomes are highly fragmented (75). In each case, the mitotic defects are blocked by an earlier (upstream) HR defect (2, 27, 43). The chromosome segregation and recombination defects are apparent on each of the three S. pombe chromosomes and are not limited to the ribosomal DNA present on both ends of chromosome III.These aberrant mitoses of Smc5-Smc6 mutants following DNA damage either block segregation completely (the “cut” phenotype, where the division septum bisects the nucleus) or result in partially segregated chromosomes that are incompletely resolved along the division plane, with an elongated mitotic spindle. Since Smc5-Smc6 is required to maintain a damage induced checkpoint arrest, the aberrant mitoses of Smc5-Smc6 mutants could result from attempting to segregate incompletely repaired chromosomes. Alternatively, defects may reflect a role for Smc5-Smc6 in promoting chromosome segregation that is revealed in hypomorphic mutants following exogenous DNA damage but is evident in null mutants without DNA damage or with low-level endogenous lesions. Notably, while viable, the hypomorphic mutants show a high level of spontaneous aneuploidy, which is also consistent with defects in chromosome segregation (35, 75).Another characteristic of smc6 mutants in S. pombe is a strong synthetic lethality with a temperature-sensitive (ts) allele of topoisomerase II (Top2), top2-191, at a permissive temperature for top2-191 of 30°C. This lethality is due to a failure of chromosome segregation that resembles mitoses in irradiated smc6-74 cells (75). top2-191 is a A802V mutation (63), and cells with this mutation show no defects in cell cycle progression at 30°C. At 36°C, top2-191 cells enter mitosis with normal kinetics but fail to segregate chromosomes. The defects of top2-191 cells at the restrictive temperature of 36°C manifest exclusively in mitosis without an interphase delay and include defective chromosome condensation. Therefore, the top2-191 allele may not affect the postreplicative decatenation activity of Top2 in S. pombe. Rather, the smc6-top2-191 interaction may be related to the structural role played by Top2 in mitotic chromosome architecture (12, 14, 79).In vertebrate cells, defective decatenation caused by Top2 inhibition with drugs such as etoposide or doxorubicin block the rejoining of molecules cleaved by Top2. This leaves DSBs that elicit a G₂ DNA damage checkpoint response in many cell types (13, 16, 17, 38). Conversely, human cells in which Top2 has been deleted enter mitosis but show disordered chromosomes that fail to segregate (12). Thus, in S. pombe, top2-191 has a terminal phenotype more closely related to that of human cells with Top2 deleted than to that of cells with chemically inhibited Top2 that are blocked midway in the decatenation reaction.Here we have investigated the mitotic role of Smc5-Smc6 in S. pombe. We find that Smc5-Smc6 is required for the removal of cohesin from damaged chromosome arms prior to anaphase and from undamaged chromosomes when the mitotic function of Top2 is compromised. We show that a defect in cohesin removal is a major determinant of lethality in smc6 mutants and highlight the importance of coordinating Smc5-Smc6 and cohesin function in the maintenance of genome integrity.     

SMC6 is required for MMS-induced interchromosomal and sister chromatid recombinations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

SMC6 (RHC18) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is a homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad18+ gene and essential for cell viability, encodes a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family protein. In contrast to the rest of the SMC family of proteins, Smc1-Smc4, which are the components of cohesin or condensin, little is known about Smc6. In this study, we generated temperature sensitive (ts) smc6 mutants of budding yeast and characterized their properties. One ts-mutant, smc6-56, ceased growth soon after up-shift to a non-permissive temperature, arrested in the late S and G2/M phase, and gradually lost viability. smc6-56 cells at a permissive temperature showed a higher sensitivity than wild-type cells to various DNA damaging agents including methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The rad52 smc6-56 double mutant showed a sensitivity to MMS similar to that of the rad52 single mutant, indicating that Smc6 is involved in a pathway that requires Rad52 to function. Moreover, no induction of interchromosomal recombination and sister chromatid recombination was observed in smc6-56 cells, which occurred in wild-type cells upon exposure to MMS.     

Role for rodent Smc6 in pericentromeric heterochromatin domains during spermatogonial differentiation and meiosis

Chromatin structure and function are for a large part determined by the six members of the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein family, which form three heterodimeric complexes: Smc1/3 (cohesin), Smc2/4 (condensin) and Smc5/6. Each complex has distinct and important roles in chromatin dynamics, gene expression and differentiation. In yeast and Drosophila, Smc6 is involved in recombinational repair, restarting collapsed replication forks and prevention of recombination in repetitive sequences such as rDNA and pericentromeric heterochromatin. Although such DNA damage control mechanisms, as well as highly dynamic changes in chromatin composition and function, are essential for gametogenesis, knowledge on Smc6 function in mammalian systems is limited. We therefore have investigated the role of Smc6 during mammalian spermatogonial differentiation, meiosis and subsequent spermiogenesis. We found that, during mouse spermatogenesis, Smc6 functions as part of meiotic pericentromeric heterochromatin domains that are initiated when differentiating spermatogonia become irreversibly committed toward meiosis. To our knowledge, we are the first to provide insight into how commitment toward meiosis alters chromatin structure and dynamics, thereby setting apart differentiating spermatogonia from the undifferentiated spermatogonia, including the spermatogonial stem cells. Interestingly, Smc6 is not essential for spermatogonial mitosis, whereas Smc6-negative meiotic cells appear unable to finish their first meiotic division. Importantly, during meiosis, we find that DNA repair or recombination sites, marked by γH2AX or Rad51 respectively, do not co-localize with the pericentromeric heterochromatin domains where Smc6 is located. Considering the repetitive nature of these domains and that Smc6 has been previously shown to prevent recombination in repetitive sequences, we hypothesize that Smc6 has a role in the prevention of aberrant recombination events between pericentromeric regions during the first meiotic prophase that would otherwise cause chromosomal aberrations leading to apoptosis, meiotic arrest or aneuploidies.     

Cohesin SMC1 beta is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination

Sister chromatid cohesion ensures the faithful segregation of chromosomes in mitosis and in both meiotic divisions. Meiosis-specific components of the cohesin complex, including the recently described SMC1 isoform SMC1 beta, were suggested to be required for meiotic sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Here we show that SMC1 beta-deficient mice of both sexes are sterile. Male meiosis is blocked in pachytene; female meiosis is highly error-prone but continues until metaphase II. Prophase axial elements (AEs) are markedly shortened, chromatin extends further from the AEs, chromosome synapsis is incomplete, and sister chromatid cohesion in chromosome arms and at centromeres is lost prematurely. In addition, crossover-associated recombination foci are absent or reduced, and meiosis-specific perinuclear telomere arrangements are impaired. Thus, SMC1 beta has a key role in meiotic cohesion, the assembly of AEs, synapsis, recombination, and chromosome movements.     

Localisation of the SMC loading complex Nipbl/Mau2 during mammalian meiotic prophase I

Evidence from lower eukaryotes suggests that the chromosomal associations of all the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes, cohesin, condensin and Smc5/6, are influenced by the Nipbl/Mau2 heterodimer. Whether this function is conserved in mammals is currently not known. During mammalian meiosis, very different localisation patterns have been reported for the SMC complexes, and the localisation of Nipbl/Mau2 has just recently started to be investigated. Here, we show that Nipbl/Mau2 binds on chromosomal axes from zygotene to mid-pachytene in germ cells of both sexes. In spermatocytes, Nipbl/Mau2 then relocalises to chromocenters, whereas in oocytes it remains bound to chromosomal axes throughout prophase to dictyate arrest. The localisation pattern of Nipbl/Mau2, together with those seen for cohesin, condensin and Smc5/6 subunits, is consistent with a role as a loading factor for cohesin and condensin I, but not for Smc5/6. We also demonstrate that Nipbl/Mau2 localises next to Rad51 and γH2AX foci. NIPBL gene deficiencies are associated with the Cornelia de Lange syndrome in humans, and we find that haploinsufficiency of the orthologous mouse gene results in an altered distribution of double-strand breaks marked by γH2AX during prophase I. However, this is insufficient to result in major meiotic malfunctions, and the chromosomal associations of the synaptonemal complex proteins and the three SMC complexes appear cytologically indistinguishable in wild-type and Nipbl ^+/? spermatocytes.     

The role of SMC proteins in the responses to DNA damage

The SMC proteins form the cores of three protein complexes in eukaryotes, cohesin, condensin and the Smc5-6 complex. Cohesin holds sister chromatids together after DNA replication and is involved in both the repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination and the intra-S-phase checkpoint. Condensin assists in the condensation of chromosomes at mitosis and also has a role in checkpoint control pathways. The Smc5-6 complex is involved in a variety of DNA repair and damage response pathways by as yet unknown mechanisms, but is also associated with repair by homologous recombination.     

Inhibition of the Smc5/6 Complex during Meiosis Perturbs Joint Molecule Formation and Resolution without Significantly Changing Crossover or Non-crossover Levels

Meiosis is a specialized cell division used by diploid organisms to form haploid gametes for sexual reproduction. Central to this reductive division is repair of endogenous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by the meiosis-specific enzyme Spo11. These DSBs are repaired in a process called homologous recombination using the sister chromatid or the homologous chromosome as a repair template, with the homolog being the preferred substrate during meiosis. Specific products of inter-homolog recombination, called crossovers, are essential for proper homolog segregation at the first meiotic nuclear division in budding yeast and mice. This study identifies an essential role for the conserved Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) 5/6 protein complex during meiotic recombination in budding yeast. Meiosis-specific smc5/6 mutants experience a block in DNA segregation without hindering meiotic progression. Establishment and removal of meiotic sister chromatid cohesin are independent of functional Smc6 protein. smc6 mutants also have normal levels of DSB formation and repair. Eliminating DSBs rescues the segregation block in smc5/6 mutants, suggesting that the complex has a function during meiotic recombination. Accordingly, smc6 mutants accumulate high levels of recombination intermediates in the form of joint molecules. Many of these joint molecules are formed between sister chromatids, which is not normally observed in wild-type cells. The normal formation of crossovers in smc6 mutants supports the notion that mainly inter-sister joint molecule resolution is impaired. In addition, return-to-function studies indicate that the Smc5/6 complex performs its most important functions during joint molecule resolution without influencing crossover formation. These results suggest that the Smc5/6 complex aids primarily in the resolution of joint molecules formed outside of canonical inter-homolog pathways.     

The condensin complexes play distinct roles to ensure normal chromosome morphogenesis during meiotic division in Arabidopsis

Meiosis is a specialized cell division essential for sexual reproduction. During meiosis the chromosomes are highly organized, and correct chromosome architecture is required for faithful segregation of chromosomes at anaphase I and II. Condensin is involved in chromosome organization during meiotic and mitotic cell divisions. Three condensin subunits, AtSMC4 and the condensin I and II specific subunits AtCAP‐D2 and AtCAP‐D3, respectively, have been studied for their role in meiosis. This has revealed that both the condensin I and condensin II complexes are required to maintain normal structural integrity of the meiotic chromosomes during the two nuclear divisions. Their roles appear functionally distinct in that condensin I is required to maintain normal compaction of the centromeric repeats and 45S rDNA, whereas loss of condensin II was associated with extensive interchromosome connections at metaphase I. Depletion of condensin is also associated with a slight reduction in crossover formation, suggesting a role during meiotic prophase I.     

Dynamics of cohesin subunits in grasshopper meiotic divisions

The cohesin complex plays a key role for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and faithful chromosome segregation in both mitosis and meiosis. This complex is formed by two structural maintenance of chromosomes protein family (SMC) subunits and two non-SMC subunits: an α-kleisin subunit SCC1/RAD21/REC8 and an SCC3-like protein. Several studies carried out in different species have revealed that the distribution of the cohesin subunits along the chromosomes during meiotic prophase I is not regular and that some subunits are distinctly incorporated at different cell stages. However, the accurate distribution of the different cohesin subunits in condensed meiotic chromosomes is still controversial. Here, we describe the dynamics of the cohesin subunits SMC1α, SMC3, RAD21 and SA1 during both meiotic divisions in grasshoppers. Although these subunits show a similar patched labelling at the interchromatid domain of metaphase I bivalents, SMCs and non-SMCs subunits do not always colocalise. Indeed, SA1 is the only cohesin subunit accumulated at the centromeric region of all metaphase I chromosomes. Additionally, non-SMC subunits do not appear at the interchromatid domain in either single X or B chromosomes. These data suggest the existence of several cohesin complexes during metaphase I. The cohesin subunits analysed are released from chromosomes at the beginning of anaphase I, with the exception of SA1 which can be detected at the centromeres until telophase II. These observations indicate that the cohesin components may be differentially loaded and released from meiotic chromosomes during the first and second meiotic divisions. The roles of these cohesin complexes for the maintenance of chromosome structure and their involvement in homologous segregation at first meiotic division are proposed and discussed.