A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples

The purity of DNA extracted from faecal samples is a key issue in the sensitivity and usefulness of biological analyses such as PCR for infectious pathogens and non-pathogens. We have compared the relative efficacy of extraction of bacterial DNA (both Gram negative and positive origin) from faeces using four commercial kits (FastDNA kit, Bio 101; Nucleospin C+T kit, Macherey-Nagal; Quantum Prep Aquapure Genomic DNA isolation kit, Bio-Rad; QIAamp DNA stool mini kit, Qiagen) and a non-commercial guanidium isothiocyanate/silica matrix method. Human faecal samples were spiked with additional known concentrations of Lactobacillus acidophilus or Bacteroides uniformis, the DNA was then extracted by each of the five methods, and tested in genus-specific PCRs. The Nucleospin method was the most sensitive procedure for the extraction of DNA from a pure bacterial culture of Gram-positive L. acidophilus (10(4) bacteria/PCR), and QIAamp and the guanidium method were most sensitive for cultures of Gram-negative B. uniformis (10(3) bacteria/PCR). However, for faecal samples, the QIAamp kit was the most effective extraction method and led to the detection of bacterial DNA over the greatest range of spike concentrations for both B. uniformis and L. acidophilus in primary PCR reactions. A difference in extraction efficacy was observed between faecal samples from different individuals. The use of appropriate DNA extraction kits or methods is critical for successful and valid PCR studies on clinical, experimental or environmental samples and we recommend that DNA extraction techniques are carefully selected with particular regard to the specimen type.     

A comparison of methods for extracting DNA from Coxiella burnetii as measured by a duplex qPCR assay

Aims: To determine the optimal DNA extraction method for the detection of Coxiella burnetii including the small‐cell variant (SCV) by real‐time PCR (qPCR) in clinical samples. Methods and Results: A duplex qPCR detecting two Coxiella burnetii gene targets (com1 and IS1111a genes) was developed. Each target in this PCR had a sensitivity of one copy number per reaction. DNA extraction methods were compared on spiked negative samples and included a silica column kit, a chloroform separation prior to a silica column method and a chloroform/phenol separation and DNA precipitation method. Conclusions: The silica column extraction method was more efficient at recovering C. burnetii DNA, from large‐cell and small‐cell variants, than a chloroform or chloroform/phenol method. The silica column method was useful on spiked human samples including serum, buffy coat and bone marrow samples. Significance and impact of study: This study demonstrated that a simple column kit method is efficient to use for the detection of C. burnetii in clinical samples including the SCV.     

Comparison of rapid methods for the extraction of bacterial DNA from colonic and caecal lumen contents of the pig

AIMS: The increasing uses of DNA methodologies to study the micro flora of the pig gastrointestinal tract requires an efficient recovery of bacterial DNA from the intestinal sample. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine which DNA extraction methods are most effective for luminal samples from pigs. Several routinely used nucleic acid extraction procedures were compared based upon quantity and purity of extracted DNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA was extracted from pig colonic and caecal lumen samples using 19 methods for bacterial DNA extraction. The quantity of total DNA recovered by each extraction method was determined and compared. Two methods using extraction with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) or phenol and two methods involving bead mill homogenization were found to provide the greatest quantity of extracted DNA for both colonic and caecal lumen. Extracted DNA from these four methods was further analysed for purity based upon the presence of PCR inhibitors, which was ascertained by determining the efficiency of amplification of a segment of the 16S rDNA. PCR amplification could be readily achieved with DNA extracted by each of these four methods, but efficiency of amplification tended to be higher with DNA from two of the methods (one extracted with PVPP and one with bead mill homogenization). CONCLUSIONS: Four extraction methods proved to be significantly superior in quantity of DNA extracted from luminal samples. Of these four, no strong inhibitors of PCR amplification were detected in any of the extracted DNA. However, the efficiency of amplification tended to be lower in DNA samples from two of the methods, suggesting the presence of low levels of PCR inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Results of this study provide a basis for choosing which DNA extraction procedures are most effective for use with samples of pig lumen.     

Comparison of different decontamination methods for reagents to detect low concentrations of bacterial 16S DNA by real-time-PCR

Contamination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents continues to be a major problem when consensus primers are used for detection of low concentrations of bacterial DNA. We designed a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for quantification of bacterial DNA by using consensus primers that bind specifically to the 16S region of bacterial DNA. We have tested four different methods of decontamination of PCR reagents in a project aimed at detecting bacterial DNA at low concentrations: deoxyribonuclease (DNAse) treatment, restriction endonuclease digestion, UV irradiation, and 8-methoxypsoralen in combination with long-wave UV light to intercalate contaminating DNA into double-stranded DNA. All four methods result in inhibition of the PCR reaction, and most of the decontamination procedures failed to eliminate the contaminating bacterial DNA. Only the DNAse decontamination proved to be efficient in eliminating contaminating DNA while conserving PCR efficiency. All four decontamination methods are time consuming and have the possibility of carrying new contamination into the reaction mixture. However, decontamination with DNAse may help, together with the use of highly purified PCR reagents, in detecting small amounts of bacterial DNA in clinical specimens.     

Rapid preparation of cyanobacterial DNA for real-time PCR analysis

AIMS: To develop a rapid preparation method for real-time PCR analysis of cyanobacteria from cultures or field samples. METHODS AND RESULTS: Field samples and cultures containing Anabaena circinalis, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii or Microcystis aeruginosa were subjected to three cell disruption treatments: (i) heating during thermocycling, (ii) microwave irradiation in the presence of detergent and (iii) probe sonication. Treated samples were directly added to the PCR reaction and analysed on two different real-time devices. A statistically significant difference was evident in the cycle thresholds for each of the treatments in all but one culture and one environmental sample, sonication and microwave treatments performing better than direct addition. The microwave treatment was also compared to the Qiagen DNA Mini kit and performance was equivalent when treated samples were analysed as above. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst microwave treatment was slightly less effective than probe sonication across all samples, it was more amenable to processing multiple samples and significantly better than heat treating the sample during thermocycling. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The microwave method described here is a simple, rapid and effective preparation method for cyanobacterial DNA that can be easily deployed in the field, making the most of the speed and flexibility offered by fixed and portable real-time PCR devices.     

Improving PCR detection of prey in molecular diet studies: importance of group‐specific primer set selection and extraction protocol performances

While the morphological identification of prey remains in predators' faeces is the most commonly used method to study trophic interactions, many studies indicate that this method does not detect all consumed prey. Polymerase chain reaction–based methods are increasingly used to detect prey DNA in the predator food bolus and have proven efficient, delivering highly accurate results. When studying complex diet samples, the extraction of total DNA is a critical step, as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors may be co‐extracted. Another critical step involves a careful selection of suitable group‐specific primer sets that should only amplify DNA from the targeted prey taxon. In this study, the food boluses of five Rattus rattus and seven Rattus exulans were analysed using both morphological and molecular methods. We tested a panel of 31 PCR primer pairs targeting bird, invertebrate and plant sequences; four of them were selected to be used as group‐specific primer pairs in PCR protocols. The performances of four DNA extraction protocols (QIAamp^® DNA stool mini kit, DNeasy^® mericon food kit and two of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide‐based methods) were compared using four variables: DNA concentration, A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ absorbance ratio, food compartment analysed (stomach or faecal contents) and total number of prey‐specific PCR amplification per sample. Our results clearly indicate that the A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ absorbance ratio, which varies between extraction protocols, is positively correlated to the number of PCR amplifications of each prey taxon. We recommend using the DNeasy^® mericon food kit (QIAGEN), which yielded results very similar to those achieved with the morphological approach.     

Evaluation of four template preparation methods for polymerase chain reaction-based detection of Salmonella in ground beef and chicken

AIMS: To compare procedures for recovering template DNA from ground beef or chicken for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection of Salmonella. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primer set of ST11 and ST15 was utilized to amplify a 429-bp product from Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Boiling and three commercial kits were evaluated for extracting DNA from pure suspensions and artificially contaminated ground beef and chicken. The detection sensitivity of the PCR assay for pure cultures was independent of the template preparation method (P=0.946). Boiling and GeneReleaser failed to detect Salm. Typhimurium at 4 x 106 cfu g(-1) in ground chicken. PrepMan Ultra and the high pure PCR template preparation kit facilitated reliable and sensitive detection of Salm. Typhimurium in two types of food. The sensitivities were approx. 4 x 103 cfu g(-1). When spiked samples were enriched in peptone water for 6 h, an initial inoculum of 1 cfu g(-1) was detectable. CONCLUSIONS: Four template DNA preparation methods differed in performance with respect to the type of samples tested. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Template DNA for the PCR detection of pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella in meat and poultry, could be effectively obtained using a simple rapid method such as the commercially available PrepMan Ultra kit.     

PCR and real time PCR for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst DNA

Three DNA extraction kits were used, all without preliminary procedures, then DNA extraction was preceded with freeze/thaw cycles in three versions. A lack of desired effect resulted in the application of liquid nitrogen/water bath cycles before the use of the extractions in further experiments. The effectiveness of DNA extraction was measured by PCR signal and C(T) values of real time PCR. A comparison of the efficiency of various Cryptosporidium parvum undiluted oocyst treatments prior to DNA extraction with the use of three kits has shown that the best results were obtained after extraction of DNA with the QIAamp DNA Tissue Mini Kit (T kit), preceded by triple liquid nitrogen/water bath in 100 degrees C for 2 minutes and with overnight proteinase K digestion. After extraction with the T kit, the detection limit was 50 oocysts per 200 microl when effectiveness was evaluated with PCR and 10 oocysts in the case of real time PCR.     

Effect of processing treatments on the white spot syndrome virus DNA in farmed shrimps (Penaeus monodon)

Aims: To investigate the effect of processing treatments on the destruction of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) DNA in WSSV‐infected farmed shrimps (Penaeus monodon). Methods and Results: The presence of WSSV was tested by single step and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primers 1s5 & 1a16 and IK1 & IK2 were used for the single step PCR and primers IK1 & IK2–IK3 & IK4 were used for the nested PCR. Various processing treatments such as icing, freezing, cooking, cooking followed by slow freezing, cooking followed by quick freezing, canning, and cold storage were employed to destroy the WSSV DNA. Of the processing treatments given, cooking followed by quick freezing was efficient in destroying WSSV DNA in WSSV‐infected shrimp products. Canning, and cooking followed by slow freezing process had some destructive effect on the WSSV DNA, as WSSV DNA in such processed shrimp products was detected only by nested PCR. Icing, slow freezing, quick freezing, and cooking processes had no effect on the destruction of WSSV DNA. A gradual increase in the destruction of WSSV DNA was observed as the cold storage period increased. Conclusion: The results indicated that cooking followed by quick freezing process destroy the WSSV DNA. Significance and Impact of the Study: WSSV can be destroyed by cooking followed by quick freezing and this combined process can reduce the disease transmission risks from commodity shrimps to native shrimps.     

Rapid and simple DNA extraction method for the detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus directly from food samples: comparison of PCR and LAMP methods

Aims: The study describes the development of simple and rapid DNA extraction method in combination with loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in food samples. Methods and Results: In this study, isolation of genomic DNA of enterotoxigenic Staph. aureus from spiked milk, milk burfi, khoa, sugarcane juice and boiled rice was carried out by boiling the isolated sample pellets for 10 min with 1% Triton X‐100. The isolated DNA was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and LAMP method. The LAMP was found to be 100 times more sensitive than PCR. The LAMP assay was very specific for Staph. aureus, and the presence of other contaminating bacterial DNAs and food matrix did not interfere or inhibit the LAMP assay. Conclusions: The template DNA extraction method developed in this study for food samples is simple, rapid and cost‐effective. LAMP was found to be less sensitive to matrix effect of food, compared to PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: The method is suitable for direct detection of Staph. aureus without any enrichment in contaminated food samples and hence finds its application in food safety analysis, in permutation with LAMP.     

Evaluation of methods for extracting Xylella fastidiosa DNA from the glassy-winged sharpshooter

The recent spread of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xylclla fastidiosa Wells et al. by an invasive vector species, Homalodisca coagulata Say, in southern California has resulted in new epidemics of Pierce's disease of grapevine. Our goal is to develop an efficient method to detect low titers of X. fastidiosa in H. coagulata that is amenable to large sample sizes for epidemiological studies. Detection of the plant pathogenic bacterium X. fastidiosa in its insect vector is complicated by low titers of bacteria, difficulty in releasing it from the insect mouthparts and foregut, and the presence of substances in the insect that inhibit polymerase chain reaction (PCr). To select the optimal protocol for DNA extraction to be used with PCR, we compared three standard methods and 11 commercially available kits for relative efficiency of X. fastidiosa DNA extraction in the presence of insect tissue. All of the protocols tested were proficient at extracting DNA from pure bacterial culture (1 x 10(5) cells), and all but one protocol successfully extracted sufficient bacterial DNA in the presence of insect tissue. Three DNA extraction techniques, immunomagnetic separation, the DNeasy Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hercules, CA), and Genomic DNA Purification kit (Fermentus, Hanover, MD), were compared more closely using a dilution series of X. fastidiosa (5000-0 cells) with and without insect tissue present. The DNeasy Tissue kit was the best kit tested, allowing detection of 5 x 10(3) X. fastidiosa cells with an insect head background.     

A comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese

Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood? Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry.     

Comparison of efficiency of various DNA extraction methods from cysts of Giardia intestinalis measured by PCR and TaqMan real time PCR

The aim of the presented study was to work out an effective method of extraction of DNA from Giardia intestinalis cysts as well as a sensitive and specific method for detection of DNA of this protozoan using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Twelve protocols for DNA extraction have been compared. Purification and extraction of DNA were preceded by additional actions in order to destroy the cysts' wall. The highest effectiveness of DNA extraction was obtained in case of alternating application of freezing the samples in liquid nitrogen and their incubation in water bath in the temperature of 100 degrees C, and then the extraction with the QIAamp DNA Tissue Mini Kit (QIAGEN)--T kit--with an all night long incubation with proteinase K in 56 degrees C. Effectiveness of DNA extraction with the use of each kit after extraction with each treatment was measured by nested PCR product of beta-giardin gene fragment and C(T) values of real time PCR of the SSU rRNA gene of G. intestinalis. The detection limit, defined as the lowest number detected in 100% cases, was 100 cysts per 200 microl when effectiveness was evaluated with nested PCR and 50 oocysts with real time PCR after extraction DNA with T kit. Results of our comparative studies have shown that all stages preceding the molecular detection of G. intestinalis DNA are equally important, and materially influence on the final effect and this version of method seems to be very useful for the sensitive detection of DNA of G. intestinalis.     

Application of gelatin-coated magnetic particles for isolation of genomic DNA from bacterial cells

Gelatin-coated magnetic particles were implemented for bacterial genomic DNA isolation in this study. Based on structural differences in the cell wall, the standard strains Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were selected. The quantity, quality, and timing process for DNA extraction using gelatin-coated magnetite were compared to reference phenol-chloroform extraction and a commercially available kit. Approximately twice as much DNA was recovered with the use of coated magnetite, providing greater yields than other DNA extraction methods. In addition, the DNA quality was determined using 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The described technique is rapid, simple, and a well-suited method to use with PCR for diagnosis of bacterial infections.     

快速、高效的羊绒羊毛织品DNA提取方法的建立

目的：建立一种快速、高效的羊绒羊毛纺织品DNA提取的方法。方法：采用chelex-100法的3种处理、试剂盒法分别提取羊绒羊毛织品的DNA,用18S rDNA片段、山羊和绵羊源性成分PCR扩增结果来比较提取效果。结果：试剂盒法提取DNA的效果优于chelex-100法,整个提取过程约需2h。9种供试材料均提取到DNA,且含有山羊和/或绵羊源性成分,与显微镜观察结果的符合率为100%。结论：建立的试剂盒法是一种快速、高效的适用于羊绒羊毛织品DNA提取的方法,为应用分子生物学方法鉴别山羊绒和绵羊毛奠定了基础。     

An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil

Aims: To evaluate six commercial DNA extraction kits for their ability to isolate PCR‐quality DNA from Bacillus spores in various soil samples. Methods and Results: Three soils were inoculated with various amounts of Bacillus cereus spores to simulate an outbreak or intentional release of the threat agent Bacillus anthracis. DNA was isolated from soil samples using six commercial DNA extraction kits. Extraction and purification efficiencies were assessed using a duplex real‐time PCR assay that included an internal positive control. The FastDNA^® SPIN kit for Soil showed the highest DNA extraction yield, while the E.Z.N.A.^® Soil DNA and PowerSoil^® DNA Isolation kits showed the highest efficiencies in removing PCR inhibitors from loam soil extracts. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that commercially available extraction kits can be used to extract PCR‐quality DNA from bacterial spores in soil. The selection of an appropriate extraction kit should depend on the characteristics of the soil sample and the intended downstream application. Significance and Impact of the Study: The results of this study aid in the selection of an appropriate DNA extraction kit for a given soil sample. Its application could expedite sample processing for real‐time PCR detection of a pathogen in soil.     

A nested-PCR assay for detection of Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants and sharpshooter leafhoppers

AIMS: Detection of Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants and insect vectors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Chelex 100 resin matrix was successfully standardized allowing a fast DNA extraction of X. fastidiosa. An amplicon of 500 bp was observed in samples of citrus leaf and citrus xylem extract, with and without symptoms of citrus variegated chlorosis, using PCR with a specific primer set indicating the presence of X. fastidiosa. The addition of insoluble acid-washed polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVPP) prior to DNA extraction of insect samples using Chelex 100 resin together with nested-PCR permitted the detection of X. fastidiosa within sharpshooter heads with great sensitivity. It was possible to detect up to two bacteria per reaction. From 250 sharpshooter samples comprising four species (Dilobopterus costalimai, Oncometopia facialis, Bucephalogonia xanthopis and Acrogonia sp.), 87 individuals showed positive results for X. fastidiosa in a nested-PCR assay. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Chelex 100 resin allowed a fast and efficient DNA extraction to be used in the detection of X. fastidiosa in citrus plants and insect vectors by PCR and nested-PCR assays, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The employment of efficient and sensitive methods to detect X. fastidiosa in citrus plants and insect vectors will greatly assist epidemiological studies.     

两种外周血 DNA 提取方法的比较

目的:外周血DNA的提取是研究乙型肝炎病毒相关临床疾病的基础,所提取DNA的质与量直接关乎下游研究的成败,经济、高效、便捷的外周血DNA提取方法对于疾病分子水平的研究尤为重要,本实验旨在比较两种外周血DNA提取方法,从而为临床研究提供有力的参考。方法:以外周抗凝血为试验样本,分别采用改良盐析法和DNA提取试剂盒法(硅胶柱纯化)进行基因组DNA的提取,通过分光光度仪测量DNA浓度和纯度,并进行PCR扩增及电泳实验。比较改良盐析法与试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)的效果。结果:试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)标本用量甚微,省时,提取DNA纯度高,步骤繁琐,PCR条带单一、亮度差;改良盐析法操作步骤少,提取DNA浓度高,PCR条带亮度佳、杂带多,耗时长。结论:两组方法各有优缺点,试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)可靠、快速,但所获DNA量少、极易降解,改良盐析法耗时,但所获DNA浓度高、量多,可根据实验时间与经费,实验所需的DNA纯度与浓度,提供的样本体积等不同的临床研究需求及条件来综合选择适宜的提取方法。     

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils

Molecular characterization of the microbial populations of soils and sediments contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is often a first step in assessing intrinsic biodegradation potential. However, soils are problematic for molecular analysis owing to the presence of organic matter, such as humic acids. Furthermore, the presence of contaminants, such as PAHs, can cause further challenges to DNA extraction, quantification, and amplification. The goal of our study was to compare the effectiveness of four commercial soil DNA extraction kits (UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation kit, PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit, PowerMax Soil DNA Isolation kit, and FastDNA SPIN kit) to extract pure, high-quality bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils. Six different contaminated soils were used to determine if there were any biases among the kits due to soil properties or level of contamination. Extracted DNA was used as a template for bacterial 16S rDNA and eukaryotic 18S rDNA amplifications, and PCR products were subsequently analyzed using denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE). We found that the FastDNA SPIN kit provided significantly higher DNA yields for all soils; however, it also resulted in the highest levels of humic acid contamination. Soil texture and organic carbon content of the soil did not affect the DNA yield of any kit. Moreover, a liquid-liquid extraction of the DNA extracts found no residual PAHs, indicating that all kits were effective at removing contaminants in the extraction process. Although the PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit gave relatively low DNA yields, it provided the highest quality DNA based on successful amplification of both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA for all six soils. DGGE fingerprints among the kits were dramatically different for both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA. The PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit revealed multiple bands for each soil and provided the most consistent DGGE profiles among replicates for both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA.     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota

AIM: As a prelude to long-term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples yielded over eight times more DNA than any other method (3144 +/- 873 microg g(-1) of sample, P < 0.05). Bacterial and fungal species richness was estimated by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit generated the greatest bacterial species richness (46 +/- 7 peaks) while Bio-Rad Aquapure yielded the highest fungal species richness (71 +/- 9.5 peaks). CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis indicated different DNA extraction methods generated different microbial community compositions using the same cecal matrix from a single donor bird. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Optimized DNA extraction protocols Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples and Bio-Rad Aquapure outperform other methods for extraction of DNA from poultry fecal samples, although these methods do not necessarily recover all available DNA. They will be used in future studies to monitor the dynamics of microbial communities of the avian ceca.