Structural and biochemical characteristics of two Staphylococcus epidermidis RNase J paralogs RNase J1 and RNase J2

RNase J enzymes are metallohydrolases that are involved in RNA maturation and RNA recycling, govern gene expression in bacteria, and catalyze both exonuclease and endonuclease activity. The catalytic activity of RNase J is regulated by multiple mechanisms which include oligomerization, conformational changes to aid substrate recognition, and the metal cofactor at the active site. However, little is known of how RNase J paralogs differ in expression and activity. Here we describe structural and biochemical features of two Staphylococcus epidermidis RNase J paralogs, RNase J1 and RNase J2. RNase J1 is a homodimer with exonuclease activity aided by two metal cofactors at the active site. RNase J2, on the other hand, has endonuclease activity and one metal ion at the active site and is predominantly a monomer. We note that the expression levels of these enzymes vary across Staphylococcal strains. Together, these observations suggest that multiple interacting RNase J paralogs could provide a strategy for functional improvisation utilizing differences in intracellular concentration, quaternary structure, and distinct active site architecture despite overall structural similarity.     

RNase J1 endonuclease activity as a probe of RNA secondary structure

Reliable determination of RNA secondary structure depends on both computer algorithms and experimental probing of nucleotides in single- or double-stranded conformation. Here we describe the exploitation of the endonucleolytic activity of the Bacillus subtilis enzyme RNase J1 as a probe of RNA structure. RNase J1 cleaves in single-stranded regions and, in vitro at least, the enzyme has relatively relaxed nucleotide specificity. We confirmed the feasibility of the approach on an RNA of known structure, B. subtilis tRNA^Thr. We then used RNase J1 to solve the secondary structure of the 5′ end of the hbs mRNA. Finally, we showed that RNase J1 can also be used in footprinting experiments by probing the interaction between the 30S ribosomal subunit and the Shine–Dalgarno element of the hbs mRNA.     

Ribosomal RNA processing and an RNase R family member in chloroplasts of Arabidopsis

An Arabidopsis mutant rnr1, which has a defect in the basic genetic system in chloroplasts, was isolated using the screening of the high chlorophyll fluorescence phenotype. Whereas chlorophyll fluorescence and immunoblot studies showed the mutant had reduced activities of photosystems I and II, molecular characterization of the mutant suggested that a T-DNA insertion impaired the expression of a gene encoding a RNase R family member with a targeting signal to chloroplasts. Since RNase R family members have a 3–5 exoribonuclease activity, we examined the RNA profile in chloroplasts. In rnr1 the intercistronic cleavage between 23S and 4.5S rRNA was impaired, and a significant reduction in rRNA in chloroplasts was found, suggesting that RNR1 functions in the maturation of chloroplast rRNA. The present results suggest that defects in the genetic system in chloroplasts cause high chlorophyll fluorescence, pale green leaf, and marked reduction in the growth rate, whereas the levels of some chloroplast RNA were higher in rnr1 than in the wild-type.     

Binding and cleavage of unstructured RNA by nuclear RNase P

Ribonuclease P (RNase P) is an essential endoribonuclease for which the best-characterized function is processing the 5' leader of pre-tRNAs. Compared to bacterial RNase P, which contains a single small protein subunit and a large catalytic RNA subunit, eukaryotic nuclear RNase P is more complex, containing nine proteins and an RNA subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Consistent with this, nuclear RNase P has been shown to possess unique RNA binding capabilities. To understand the unique molecular recognition of nuclear RNase P, the interaction of S. cerevisiae RNase P with single-stranded RNA was characterized. Unstructured, single-stranded RNA inhibits RNase P in a size-dependent manner, suggesting that multiple interactions are required for high affinity binding. Mixed-sequence RNAs from protein-coding regions also bind strongly to the RNase P holoenzyme. However, in contrast to poly(U) homopolymer RNA that is not cleaved, a variety of mixed-sequence RNAs have multiple preferential cleavage sites that do not correspond to identifiable consensus structures or sequences. In addition, pre-tRNA(Tyr), poly(U)(50) RNA, and mixed-sequence RNA cross-link with purified RNase P in the RNA subunit Rpr1 near the active site in "Conserved Region I," although the exact positions vary. Additional contacts between poly(U)(50) and the RNase P proteins Rpr2p and Pop4p were identified. We conclude that unstructured RNAs interact with multiple protein and RNA contacts near the RNase P RNA active site, but that cleavage depends on the nature of interaction with the active site.     

Secondary structure probing of the human RNase MRP RNA reveals the potential for MRP RNA subsets

RNase MRP is a ribonucleoprotein endoribonuclease involved in eukaryotic pre-rRNA processing. The enzyme possesses an RNA subunit, structurally related to that of RNase P RNA, that is thought to be catalytic. RNase MRP RNA sequences from Saccharomycetaceae species are structurally well defined through detailed phylogenetic and structural analysis. In contrast, higher eukaryote MRP RNA structure models are based on comparative sequence analysis of only five sequences and limited probing data. Detailed structural analysis of the Homo sapiens MRP RNA, entailing enzymatic and chemical probing, is reported. The data are consistent with the phylogenetic secondary structure model and demonstrate unequivocally that higher eukaryote MRP RNA structure differs significantly from that reported for Saccharomycetaceae species. Neither model can account for all of the known MRP RNAs and we thus propose the evolution of at least two subsets of RNase MRP secondary structure, differing predominantly in the predicted specificity domain.     

Analysis of the tertiary structure of bacterial RNase P RNA

The ubiquitous occurrence of ribonuclease P (RNase P) as a ribonucleoprotein and the catalytic properties of bacterial RNase P RNAs indicate that RNA fulfills an ancient and important role in the function of this enzyme. This review focuses on efforts to determine the structure of the bacterial RNase P RNA ribozyme. Phylogenetic comparative analysis of a library of bacterial RNase P RNA sequences has resulted in a well-developed secondary structure model and allowed identification of some elements of tertiary structure. The native structure has been redesigned by circular permutation to facilitate intra- and inter-molecular crosslinking experiments in order to gain further structural information. The crosslinking constraints, together with the constraints provided by comparative analyses, have been incorporated into a first-order model of the structure of the ribozyme-substrate complex. The developing structural perspective allows the design of self-cleaving pre-tRNA-RNase P RNA conjugates which are useful tools for additional structure-probing experiments.Abbreviations cpRNA circularly permuted RNA     

Imprinting of the murine MAS protooncogene is restricted to its antisense RNA.

The Mas protooncogene encodes a G protein-coupled receptor with the common seven transmembrane domains and may be involved in the actions of angiotensins. The gene is located in close proximity to the paternally imprinted Igf2r gene and its maternal imprinting has been reported but remained controversial. We used mice carrying a targeted deletion of the Mas protooncogene on the maternal or paternal chromosome to clarify this issue. In all Mas-expressing organs of adult mice such as heart, kidney, testis or brain, no Mas mRNA was missing in heterozygous animals inheriting the deleted allele from the father excluding mono-allelic paternal expression. However, we show exclusive paternal expression of a Mas antisense RNA, confirming the maternal imprinting of this antisense RNA in all investigated adult tissues and in embryos. Our results strongly suggest that Mas is not imprinted in mice but that an antisense RNA probably starting in the neighboring Igf2r gene is maternally imprinted in both embryos and adult organs.     

叶绿体J蛋白研究进展

J蛋白是广泛存在于细胞内的一种分子伴侣。它作为Hsp70的辅伴侣分子有着广泛而复杂的生物学功能。本文概述了J蛋白的相关概念、结构、种类、分布及其作用机制,并重点讨论了其在叶绿体内的功能。最后对有关J蛋白研究中需要解决的问题做了展望。     

In vitro and in vivo action of antisense RNA

The transient or permanent expression of antisense RNA represents one option to apply antisense techniques in biotechnology and medical research. Despite the increasing importance and use of antisense nucleic acids as well as their significant antisense-specific phenotypic effects in vivo, there is an obvious lack of explanation for the mechanism of their action. By studying naturally occurring antisense RNA and analyzing their mechanism of action we attempt to learn more about the design, the use, and the critical parameters of artificial antisense RNA. Attempts to derive models from biochemical and structural studies for the interactions between antisense RNAs and their targets will be discussed.     

Novel application of Phi29 DNA polymerase: RNA detection and analysis in vitro and in situ by target RNA-primed RCA

We present a novel Phi29 DNA polymerase application in RCA-based target RNA detection and analysis. The 3′→5′ RNase activity of Phi29 DNA polymerase converts target RNA into a primer and the polymerase uses this newly generated primer for RCA initiation. Therefore, using target RNA-primed RCA, padlock probes may be targeted to inner RNA sequences and their peculiarities can be analyzed directly. We demonstrate that the exoribonucleolytic activity of Phi29 DNA polymerase can be successfully applied in vitro and in situ. These findings expand the potential for detection and analysis of RNA sequences distanced from 3′-end.     

Broadening the mission of an RNA enzyme

The “RNA World” hypothesis suggests that life developed from RNA enzymes termed ribozymes, which carry out reactions without assistance from proteins. Ribonuclease (RNase) P is one ribozyme that appears to have adapted these origins to modern cellular life by adding protein to the RNA core in order to broaden the potential functions. This RNA‐protein complex plays diverse roles in processing RNA, but its best‐understood reaction is pre‐tRNA maturation, resulting in mature 5' ends of tRNAs. The core catalytic activity resides in the RNA subunit of almost all RNase P enzymes but broader substrate tolerance is required for recognizing not only the diverse sequences of tRNAs, but also additional cellular RNA substrates. This broader substrate tolerance is provided by the addition of protein to the RNA core and allows RNase P to selectively recognize different RNAs, and possibly ribonucleoprotein (RNP) substrates. Thus, increased protein content correlated with evolution from bacteria to eukaryotes has further enhanced substrate potential enabling the enzyme to function in a complex cellular environment. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 1244–1251, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

反义RNA在基因治疗中的应用

由于反义RNA作为封闭基因表达的有效手段具有特异性强、安全性高、操作简单、靶基因范围广等特点,已被广泛应用于基因治疗肿瘤和病毒相关疾病的研究,反义RNA治疗肿瘤可以通过抑制癌基因的表达、封闭融合癌基因、抑制肿瘤细胞的耐药性、调节细胞因子的表达量等途径;反义RNA治疗病毒相关疾病多集中在艾滋病上,其手段主要是反义封闭TAR。反义RNA作为基因治疗的新途径具有良好的前景,但在设计上和应用上还存在一些急待解决的问题。     

Use of RNA Secondary Structure for Studying the Evolution of RNase P and RNase MRP

Secondary structure is evaluated for determining evolutionary relationships between catalytic RNA molecules that are so distantly related they are scarcely alignable. The ribonucleoproteins RNase P (P) and RNase MRP (MRP) have been suggested to be evolutionarily related because of similarities in both function and secondary structure. However, their RNA sequences cannot be aligned with any confidence, and this leads to uncertainty in any trees inferred from sequences. We report several approaches to using secondary structures for inferring evolutionary trees and emphasize quantitative tests to demonstrate that evolutionary information can be recovered. For P and MRP, three hypotheses for the relatedness are considered. The first is that MRP is derived from P in early eukaryotes. The next is that MRP is derived from P from an early endosymbiont. The third is that both P and MRP evolved in the RNA-world (and the need for MRP has since been lost in prokaryotes). Quantitative comparisons of the pRNA and mrpRNA secondary structures have found that the possibility of an organellar origin of MRP is unlikely. In addition, comparison of secondary structures support the identity of an RNase P–like sequence in the maize chloroplast genome. Overall, it is concluded that RNA secondary structure is useful for evaluating evolutionary relatedness, even with sequences that cannot be aligned with confidence. Received: 19 July 1999 / Accepted: 3 May 2000