hsp70 is not required for high affinity binding of purified calf uterine estrogen receptor to estrogen response element DNA in Vitro

Bovine estrogen receptor (ER) was purified to near homogeneity by estrogen response element (ERE) affinity chromatography, and its ERE binding ability was measured in vitro. Highly purified ER bound EREs with reduced affinity compared to partially purified ER. Partially purified ER contained hsp70, but highly purified ER did not. We examined whether addition of purified recombinant human hsp70 or purified bovine hsp70 would restore the higher ERE binding affinity, stoichiometry, and ligand retention detected with partially purified receptor and how hsp70 affected the rate of ER-ERE association and dissociation. ER-ERE binding was not affected by antibodies to either constitutive or induced forms of hsp70, regardless of ER purity. Addition of purified hsp70, with or without ATP and Mg²⁺, did not affect the association or dissociation rates of highly purified liganded ER binding to ERE. hsp70 Did not alter the total amount of ER-ERE complex formed. Similarly, hsp70 did not affect the rate of [³H]estradiol (E₂) or [³H]4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) ligand dissociation from ER in the presence or absence of EREs. These data contrast with a report showing that maximal ERE binding by highly purified recombinant human ER required hsp70. We conclude that ER, purified from a physiological source, i.e., calf uterus, does not require hsp70 for maximal ER-ERE binding in vitro. Additionally, once ER is activated and bound by ligand, the receptor assumes its proper tertiary structure, and hsp70 does not impact ER ligand binding domain conformation.     

In vitro and in vivo interactions between nuclear receptors at estrogen response elements

To study mechanisms involved in the antiestrogenic effect of retinoic acid (RA), previously described in mammalian cells, we used in vitro and in vivo approaches. One hypothesis was direct competition between nuclear receptors (ER, RAR and RXR) at the DNA level. We first showed in vitro that the RAR/RXR heterodimer could weakly bind an ERE and that retinoid receptors reduced binding of ER to an ERE. We next checked whether, in yeast, direct competition between receptors that recognize the same responsive element could be monitored in a reconstituted heterologous estrogen-responsive system, by determining the expression of a reporter gene. We then co-transformed RAR and RXR in an estrogenic responsive strain. This model demonstrated that, even though RAR/RXR was able to bind an ERE, the addition of retinoic acid had no inhibitory effect on estrogen-induced responses in this yeast system, unlike in mammalian cells. Interference between these receptors should require other factors than interactions at the ERE level. This model could be used to identify mammalian factors interacting with estrogen and retinoic acid receptors which could play a role in crosstalk between these receptors.     

Dehydroepiandrosterone stimulates the estrogen response element

Studies suggest that the steroid, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) can exert effects directly, in addition to its indirect role serving as a precursor for other steroids such as androgens and estrogens. Because DHEA is one of the most abundant adrenal steroids secreted in man, we investigated the functional activity of DHEA on the classic estrogen response element (ERE) in the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER) in transiently transfected cells. GT1-7 hypothalamic neuronal cells, devoid of the estrogen receptor, were transiently transfected with the estrogen receptor expression plasmid (HEGO) and the estrogen response element luciferase (ERELUC) reporter vector. As expected, a dose-response stimulation of luciferase activity was observed in cells treated with estradiol. Concentrations of estradiol from 10⁻¹⁰–10⁻⁶ M resulted in a 136–195 percent increase in luciferase activity compared with control. A dose-response stimulation was also observed in the cells treated with DHEA. A maximum stimulation of 177 percent increase in luciferase activity compared with control was observed with DHEA at a concentration of 10⁻⁵ M. Both the estradiol and DHEA stimulation of ERE luciferase activity was inhibited by the estrogen receptor antagonist, ICI 182,780. The aromatase inhibitor, formestane in combination with estradiol or DHEA had no effect on luciferase activity, suggesting that the effect of DHEA is independent of its conversion to estadiol. Estradiol levels, as measured by ELISA, were appropriately elevated in the estradiol-treated cells but were not significantly different from the control cells in the DHEA-treated cells. These studies suggest a functional in vitro role of DHEA in activating the ERE in the presence of the classic ER.     

Association of the 90-kDa heat shock protein does not affect the ligand-binding ability of androgen receptor

An N-terminal truncated androgen receptor with putative DNA- and ligand- binding domains (AR438) and that with a ligand-binding domain (AR612) were expressed under control of the T7 promoter in E. coli or translated in vitro with rabbit reticulocyte lysate, and their ligand-binding properties and the interaction with HSP90 were investigated. Bacterially expressed AR438 and AR612 bound a synthetic androgen, [³H]R1881, with apparent dissociation constant of 2.6 ± 0.2 and 3.1 ± 0.7 nM, respectively, values which are comparable to those of androgen receptor in target tissues. The recombinant androgen receptors sedimented at the 4–5 S region irrespective of the presence of 10 mM tungstate, indicating that the receptor exists free from HtpG, which is the bacterial homolog of eukaryotic HSP90. The apparent dissociation constant of truncated androgen receptors translated in vitro was 0.1 nM for AR438 and 0.2 nM for AR612. Sedimentation coefficients of in vitro translated molecules were converted from 7–8 S in the presence of tungstate to 3 S in the absence of tungstate. Both AR438 and AR612 translated in vitro were retained by anti-rat HSP90 antibody-protein A Sepharose. Exposure to 0.3 M NaCl in the presence of ligand caused dissociation of AR438 and AR612 from HSP90, and concomitantly, the DNA-cellulose binding ability of AR438 was enhanced. Thus, we conclude that the androgen receptor associates with HSP90 through the ligand-binding domain and that this association prevents the interaction of the androgen receptor with DNA. However, HSP90 seems to have little effect on the ligand-binding characteristics of the androgen receptor.     

Accumulation of a non-binding form of estrogen receptor in MCF-7 cells under hydroxytamoxifen treatment

It is well known that MCF-7 cells, when incubated with hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) loose their capacity to bind [³H]estradiol. By using Western blotting and [³H]tamoxifen aziridine labeling of KCl extracts from these cells we found that this loss in binding capacity was not associated with a disappearance of the estrogen receptor (ER) protein, an event known to occur after incubation with estradiol. Attempts to label under exchange conditions these ER molecules, which, on the basis of enzyme immunoassays appear to accumulate under OH-Tam treatment, were unsuccessful. Cell fractionation suggested that their origin is nuclear. Assessment of a few triphenylethylenic antiestrogens, as far as their inhibitory potency towards the in vitro MCF-7 cell growth is concerned, indicated a correlation between accumulation of these non-binding ER molecules and the antiestrogen antiproliferative action. However, we were unable to demonstrate absence of such an ER accumulation in two tamoxifen-resistant variants. Impaired folding of the ER protein or impaired phosphorylation of its hormone-binding domain are attractive hypotheses to account for these non-binding ER molecules. Whether these ER molecules have any physiological role, such as competition with the “normal” receptor molecules for the estrogen responsive elements on the DNA is unknown and deserves further study.     

11β-Amidoalkyl estradiols, a new series of pure antiestrogens

In order to find new antiestrogens, devoid of any agonistic activity, a series of 11β-amidoalkyl estradiols were prepared. These compounds have been studied in comparison with tamoxifen (TAM): in vitro, for their relative binding affinities (RBA) for mouse and MCF-7 estrogen receptors (ER) and for their antiproliferative effect on MCF-7 (estradiol or EGF/PDGF stimulated) and Ly2 human breast cancer cell lines; in vivo, for their uterotrophic/antiuterotrophic activities in the mouse and for their antitumoral activities on MCF-7 tumors implanted in nude mice.

The most representative compounds are N-methyl-N-isopropyl-(3,17β-dihydroxy-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-11β-yl)-undecanamide (RU 51625) and its 17-ethynyl derivative (RU 53637). They showed good RBAs for ER and a stronger antiproliferative effect than TAM in vitro. Unlike TAM, these compounds inhibited growth factor stimulated MCF-7 proliferation, and the growth of the TAM resistant cell line Ly2. In vivo, they were completely devoid of uterotrophic activity, when given subcutaneously in mice, but exhibited a slight agonistic effect when administered orally. They showed interesting antitumor activities in nude mice by the percutaneous route, but RU 53637 was significantly more potent than RU 51625 when given orally.     

Oestrogen receptor gene structure and function in breast cancer

The mechanisms underlying loss of oestrogen responsiveness in breast cancer are not well-defined. Potential mechanisms include loss of receptor expression, alterations in the oestrogen receptor (ER) gene producing proteins with abnormal function, or changes to receptor-dependent or -independent pathways controlling cell proliferation. Examination by Southern analysis of the ER gene in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast tumour biopsies failed to provide evidence of gross rearrangements and in only only one of thirty seven tumour DNA samples was significant gene amplification observed. No restriction fragment length polymorphisms were detected for the restriction enzymes EcoRI, Pst I or Hind III. Methylation of the ER gene as assessed by Hpa II and Msp I restriction enzyme digests varied between tumours but the degree of methylation was not correlated with levels of expression of the receptor protein. Similar findings applied in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast cancer cell lines and clonal lines of MCF-7 cells, which were developed as an in vitro model for the acquisition of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance. In this model there was no evidence that changes to ER receptor function and/or structure at the level of the ER gene, mRNA, ligand binding, and ability to induce progesterone receptor might account for the development of hormone resistance. However, the ability of ER to interact with a DNA sequence containing the vitellogenin promoter oestrogen response element, as assessed by gel retardation assay, was impaired in the clone showing the greatest degree of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance.     

Estrogen regulation of trefoil factor 1 expression by estrogen receptor alpha and Sp proteins

Estrogen-responsive genes in human breast cancer cells often have an estrogen response element (ERE) positioned next to an Sp1 binding site. In chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, we investigated the binding of estrogen receptor alpha (ER), Sp1, and Sp3 to the episomal and native estrogen-responsive trefoil factor 1 (TFF1; formerly pS2) promoter in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mutation of the Sp site upstream of the ERE reduced estrogen responsiveness and prevented binding of Sp1 and Sp3, but not ER to the episomal promoter. In the absence of estradiol (E2), Sp1, Sp3, histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC), and HDAC2, and low levels of acetylated H3 and H4 are associated with the native promoter, with the histones being engaged in dynamic reversible acetylation. Following E2 addition, levels of ER and acetylated H3 and H4 bound to the native promoter increases. There is clearance of Sp1, but not of Sp3, from the promoter while HDAC1 and HDAC2 remain bound. These data are consistent with a model in which Sp1 or Sp3 aid in recruitment of HDACs and histone acetyltransferases (HATs) to mediate dynamic acetylation of histones associated with the TFF1 promoter, which is in a state of readiness to respond to events occurring following the addition of estrogen.     

Binding of type II nuclear receptors and estrogen receptor to full and half-site estrogen response elements in vitro.

The mechanism by which retinoids, thyroid hormone (T3) and estrogens modulate the growth of breast cancer cells is unclear. Since nuclear type II nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) and thyroid hormone receptor (TR), bind direct repeats (DR) of the estrogen response elements (ERE) half-site (5'-AGGTCA-3'), we examined the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) versus type II nuclear receptors, i.e. RARalpha, beta and gamma, RXRbeta, TRalpha and TRbeta, to bind various EREs in vitro . ER bound a consensus ERE, containing a perfectly palindromic 17 bp inverted repeat (IR), as a homodimer. In contrast, ER did not bind to a single ERE half-site. Likewise, ER did not bind two tandem (38 bp apart) half-sites, but low ER binding was detected to three tandem copies of the same half-site. RARalpha,beta or gamma bound both ERE and half-site constructs as a homodimer. RXRbeta did not bind full or half-site EREs, nor did RXRbeta enhance RARalpha binding to a full ERE. However, RARalpha and RXRbeta bound a half-site ERE cooperatively forming a dimeric complex. The RARalpha-RXRbeta heterodimer bound the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 estrogen responsive unit, with two non-consensus EREs, with higher affinity than one or two copies of the full or half-site ERE. Both TRalpha and TRbeta bound the full and the half-site ERE as monomers and homodimers and cooperatively as heterodimers with RXRbeta. We suggest that the cellular concentrations of nuclear receptors and their ligands, and the nature of the ERE or half-site sequence and those of its flanking sequences determine the occupation of EREs in estrogen-regulated genes in vivo .     

Stability of the ligand-estrogen receptor interaction depends on estrogen response element flanking sequences and cellular factors

To determine whether accessory proteins mediate the ligand- and DNA sequence-dependent specificity of estrogen receptor (ER) interaction with DNA, the binding of partly purified vs highly purified bovine ER to various estrogen response elements (EREs) was measured in the presence of different ER ligands. Partly purified estradiol-liganded ER (E₂-ER) binds cooperatively to stereoaligned tandem EREs flanked by naturally occurring AT-rich sequences, with a stoichiometry of one E₂-ER dimer per ERE. In contrast, highly purified E₂-ER binds with a 10-fold lower affinity and non-cooperatively to EREs flanked by the AT-rich region. Moreover, the binding stoichiometry of highly purified E₂-ER was 0.5 E₂-ER dimer, or one monomer per ERE, independent of the ERE flanking sequence. Interestingly, the binding of ER liganded with the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT-ER) was non-cooperative with an apparent stoichiometry of 0.5 4-OHT-ER dimer per ERE, regardless of ER purity or ERE flanking sequence. We recently showed that when 4-OHT-ER binds DNA, one molecule of 4-OHT dissociates from the dimeric 4-OHT-ER-ERE complex, accounting for the reduced apparent binding stoichiometry. In contrast, ER covalently bound by tamoxifen aziridine (TAz) gave an ERE binding stoichiometry of one TAz-ER dimer per ERE, and TAz-ER binds cooperatively to multiple AT-rich EREs, regardless of the purity of the receptor. We have obtained evidence that purification of ER removes an accessory protein(s) that interacts with ER in a sequence- and/or DNA conformational-dependent manner, resulting in stabilization of E₂, but not 4-OHT, in the ligand binding domain when the receptor binds to DNA. We postulate that retention of ligand by ER maintains the receptor in a conformation necessary to achieve high-affinity, cooperative ERE binding.     

Differential DNA-binding abilities of estrogen receptor occupied with two classes of antiestrogens: studies using human estrogen receptor overexpressed in mammalian cells.

We have developed a transient transfection system using the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter to express the human estrogen receptor (ER) at very high levels in COS-1 cells and have used it to study the interaction of agonist and antagonist receptor complexes with estrogen response element (ERE) DNA. ER can be expressed to levels of 20-40 pmol/mg or 0.2-0.3% of total soluble protein and all of the soluble receptor is capable of binding hormone. The ER binds estradiol with high affinity (Kd 0.2 nM), and is indistinguishable from native ER in that the receptor is capable of recognizing its cognate DNA response element with high affinity, and of transactivating a transgene in an estradiol-dependent manner. Gel mobility shift assays reveal interesting ligand-dependent differences in the binding of receptor complexes to ERE DNA. Receptors occupied by estradiol or the type I antiestrogen transhydroxytamoxifen bind to DNA response elements when exposed to the ligand in vitro or in vivo. Likewise, receptors exposed to the type II antiestrogen ICI 164,384 in vitro bind to ERE DNA. However, when receptor exposure to ICI 164,384 is carried out in vivo, the ER-ICI 164,384 complexes do not bind to ERE DNA, or do so only weakly. This effect is not reversed by subsequent incubation with estradiol in vitro, but is rapidly reversible by in vivo estradiol exposure of intact COS-1 cells. This suggests there may be some cellular process involved in the mechanism of antagonism by the pure antiestrogen ICI 164,384, which is not observed in cell-free extracts.