Effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.

To assess the effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration two groups of eight patients with duodenal ulcer or oesophagitis matched for age, sex, and cigarette consumption were given either cimetidine 1 g daily or ranitidine 300 mg daily for one month. There was no significant change in the cholesterol content of HDL and its subfraction HDL3 after treatment with ranitidine or cimetidine, or in the cholesterol content of the subfraction HDL2 after treatment with ranitidine; the HDL2 cholesterol concentration was, however, significantly increased after treatment with cimetidine. Further studies are being undertaken to establish the mechanism of this effect.     

Cimetidine and ranitidine in duodenal ulcer.

Two histamine H2 antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, given in doses of 1 g daily and 200 mg daily to 18 and 20 patients respectively proved equivalent in promoting healing of duodenal ulcer. No adverse effects occurred during the trial, though serum urea and creatinine concentrations tended to rise slightly during treatment with cimetidine but not ranitidine. Choice between the two drugs is likely to be influenced by overall patterns of adverse effects rather than considerations of individual potency.     

Behavior of thyrotropic, triiodothyronine, thyroxine and cortisol hormone levels in blood serum of patients with duodenal ulcer treated with ranitidine]

Blood serum concentrations of thyrotropic hormone (TSH), triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4) and cortisol have been measured in 50 patients with duodenal ulcer. The determinations were repeated after a specific time of treatment with ranitidine: in 45 patients after 3 weeks and in 37 after additional 30 days of treatment. During the first period of treatment ranitidine was administered at a dose of 300 mg divided into two daily doses and during the second period of treatment at a single daily dose of 150 mg. A small but statistically significant changes, an increase in T3 and a decrease in TSH concentration, were observed before the treatment. No changes concerning these two parameters were found as an effect of the treatment. A decrease in the concentration of T4 was found, on the other hand, after three weeks of ranitidine administration. This decrease persisted after further 30 days of chronic treatment with ranitidine. No significant changes concerning blood serum cortisol concentration were found in any of the studied groups.     

The pharmacokinetics of H2 receptor blocking agents in compensated liver cirrhosis

The bioavailability of oral and intravenous cimetidine and ranitidine was studied in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Single doses of 200 and 400 mg cimetidine were used for both administration routes, while ranitidine was administered in doses of 150 mg orally or 50 mg i.v. Plasma concentrations and urinary recovery were determined by the HPLC method. The pharmacokinetics of both of these drugs in the cirrhotic patients did not differ from those found in normal subjects. The two doses of cimetidine given i.v. gave rise to the same plasma concentrations, while after oral administration, 400 mg produced higher plasma concentrations than 200 mg. As to the pharmacokinetic parameters, neither cimetidine nor ranitidine administered i.v. offered any further advantages compared to the oral route. The urinary recovery of both cimetidine and ranitidine was higher after intravenous than after oral administration. It is concluded therefore that the pharmacokinetics of cimetidine and ranitidine is not altered in compensated liver cirrhosis.     

ACE-inhibitors and defence reflexes of the airways.

The group of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is one of the drugs of choice for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart disease. However, it has been reported that in some of patients ACE-inhibitors induce hyperreactivity of the airways with occurrence of a persistent dry cough, dyspnoe and wheezing. We supposed that the mechanism of these hyperreactivity is connected to accumulation of bradykinin, tachykinins and other inflammatory mediators in the airways. Increased local concentration of inflammatory neuropeptides stimulates bronchial C fibres and rapidly adapting receptors and provoke the cough reflex. Inflammatory processes in the airways could be followed by contraction of airway smooth muscle. In this study, our aim was to measure the changes of the number and intensity of mechanical induced cough in cats, which were treated for days with enalapril (5 mg/kg b.w.). After 15 days of treatment the reactivity of the lung and tracheal smooth muscles to the bronchoconstrictor mediator histamine was estimated. As to our finding 15 days of administration of enalapril results in significant increase of cough parameters measured with a more significant sensitivity of the laryngopharyngeal part. In the experimental animals we observed increased reactivity of bronchial smooth muscle to histamine after 15 days of enalapril treatment. The reactivity of the lung smooth muscle to the histamine was not significantly changed. These results confirmed the increased cough sensitivity and increased bronchial reactivity after enalapril treatment. These experimental animal model may be useful for the investigation of the pharmacological minimization of respiratory adverse effect of ACE-inhibitors.     

Effect of intravenous cimetidine, ranitidine and pentagastrin and intragastric prostaglandin E1 treatments on gastric transmucosal potential difference in the rat.

Effects of intravenous cimetidine, ranitidine and intragastric prostaglandin E1 (alprostadil) treatments on the transmucosal potential difference (PD) of the stomach were compared. It was also investigated whether the above-mentioned drugs influenced the decrease of PD which followed both intragastric administration of 30% alcohol or Ca++ solution in 5 Mm final concentration and intravenous administration of pentagastrin. Both cimetidine and ranitidine treatments led to significant (p < 0.05) increase of PD, the effect of ranitidine was dose dependent. Prostaglandin E1 in a dose of 40 micrograms/kg led to significant decrease of PD (< 0.05). Both intragastric administration of prostaglandin E1 in a dose of 40 micrograms/kg and intravenous administration of ranitidine in a dose of 10 mg/kg significantly diminish the effect of Ca++ and alcohol to decrease PD. Neither prostaglandin E1, nor ranitidine pretreatment had any effect on the rapid and highly significant (p < 0.01) decrease of PD following i.v. pentagastrin administration. It is hypothesized that transmucosal PD of the stomach provides information not only on the actual condition of the mucosal barrier but on the electrophysiology of gastric secretion as well.     

Combined treatment of advanced malignant melanoma with coumarin and cimetidine

Summary Immunostimulant therapy with coumarin and cimetidine was evaluated in 17 patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Induction therapy with coumarin 100 mg daily was given for 8 weeks, whereupon cimetidine 1000 mg daily was added. No patients had been previously treated with cytotoxic drugs, and all patients had a good performance status. In 16 patients progressive disease was observed, and only 1 patient experienced no change in condition, lasting 30 weeks. We conclude that treatment with this schedule of coumarin and cimetidine is without effect in advanced malignant melanoma.     

Omeprazole and cimetidine in the treatment of ulcers of the body of the stomach: a double blind comparative trial. Danish Omeprazole Study Group.

OBJECTIVE--To see whether omeprazole was superior to cimetidine in healing ulcers of the body of the stomach. DESIGN--Double blind randomised parallel group study of omeprazole versus cimetidine for six weeks with assessment of healing at end of every second week. SETTING--Outpatient referrals in 11 centres in Denmark. PATIENTS--One hundred sixty one patients who satisfied the following criteria: age 18-79; one or more ulcers of body of stomach (that is, at or above the angulus) seen endoscopically within four days before study treatment; no H2 receptor antagonists taken within previous two weeks; no history of gastric surgery and no complications needing surgery; no concurrent treatment or disease that might confound assessment; oral contraception or an intrauterine device being used by women of childbearing age. INTERVENTIONS--Omeprazole 30 mg daily (one capsule in the morning) or cimetidine 1 g daily (one 200 mg tablet thrice daily, two tablets at bedtime) for six weeks. Inactive capsules and tablets provided so that all patients took same number of capsules and tablets daily. Compliance monitored by pill counts. END POINT--Endoscopic evidence of accelerated healing of type I gastric ulcers after four weeks of omeprazole. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Pain recorded on diary cards and patients assessed after two, four, and six weeks of treatment for clinical state and by endoscopy and biopsy and repeat laboratory tests. Twenty eight patients withdrawn during trial for violations of protocol. At two weeks healing rates were identical in the two treatment groups (omeprazole 41% (30/73 patients); cimetidine 41% (30/73]. At four weeks cumulative healing rates were 77% (53/69 patients) in the omeprazole treatment group and 58% (41/71) in the cimetidine treatment group (95% confidence interval of difference between groups 4% to 34%). By six weeks the cumulative healing rates in the two treatment groups differed by only 6% (60/68 patients (88%) given omeprazole; 53/65 (82%) given cimetidine). Log rank analysis with ulcer size used as covariable showed a significant difference in healing times in favour of omeprazole. There was no difference in the occurrence of pain relief between the two treatment groups. No serious clinical or biochemical side effects of treatment were noted. CONCLUSIONS--Omeprazole 30 mg daily accelerates healing of ulcers in the body of the stomach as compared with cimetidine 1 g daily. This effect is more pronounced in ulcers greater than 12 mm diameter.     

Effect of H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine on reproductive functions in male mice.

Na+,K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase in testis were inhibited with an oral administration of cimetidine and ranitidine. Cimetidine at dose level of 100 and 30 mg while ranitidine at 70 and 10 mg per kg body wt inhibited the enzyme activities, 24 hr after single administration or daily administration for 15-days. Mg(2+)-ATPase activity was increased with cimetidine while ranitidine inhibited the enzyme. Michaelis-Menten kinetic characteristics revealed mixed type of inhibition for Na+,K(+)-ATPase with cimetidine, whereas it was noncompetitive for Ca(2+)-ATPase with cimetidine as well as ranitidine administration. Inhibition of Na+,K(+)-ATPase with ranitidine was also of noncompetitive type. Mg(2+)-ATPase behaved differently with administration of ranitidine at both the time points used i.e. noncompetitive type of inhibition after 24 hr and mixed type after 15-days. Histologically, signs of degeneration of testicular elements appeared after administration of cimetidine with a significant decrease in tubular diameter and germinal epithelial cell height. Ranitidine administration did not produce any change in the seminiferous tubules of testis. Scanning electron microscopy of spermatozoa from cimetidine-treated mice exhibited distinct departure from the normal morphology such as, (i) breaks at various places along distal portion of the tail, (ii) roughening, wrinkling and disorganization of plasma membrane of the head region, (iii) decapitation of the head and (iv) changes in shape of cytoplasmic droplet. Ranitidine administration showed normal morphology of the spermatozoa.     

Phase I evaluation of coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) and cimetidine in patients with advanced malignancies.

Fifty-four patients with advanced malignancies were treated on this phase I trial of coumarin and cimetidine. The dose of coumarin was escalated, with three patients treated at each dose level, while the cimetidine dose was held constant at 300 mg four times daily. Patients received coumarin alone as a single daily oral dose for 14 days; on day 15, cimetidine was added and both drugs were continued until progression of disease. This trial was initiated with patients receiving coumarin at 400 mg daily and closed at 7 g daily with four of five patients on this dose experiencing nausea and vomiting. Treatment was generally well tolerated over a wide range of coumarin doses. Symptomatic side effects were few, mild, and usually self limited. Side effects included insomnia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dizziness. Two patients withdrew from therapy because of daily nausea and vomiting. Typically, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness occurred 2.5-3 hours after a dose of coumarin. In most patients, these side effects abated spontaneously with continuation of therapy. There was no significant hematologic or renal toxicity. Hepatotoxicity occurred in only one patient and was manifested by asymptomatic abnormal elevations of serum hepatic transaminases. This toxicity was reversible upon interruption of therapy. Objective tumor regressions were observed in six patients with renal cell carcinoma. Responses occurred at coumarin doses ranging from 600 mg to 5 g daily. Coumarin is a relatively nontoxic, oral, outpatient therapy that warrants further investigations for the treatment of human malignancies. Because of its low toxicity, there is potential for combining coumarin with chemotherapeutic and/or biological agents in an attempt to improve on efficacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists on the Secretion of Cerebrospinal Fluid in the Cat

Following a recent report that epithelial cells of the choroid plexus possess histamine H2 receptors, the effect of cimetidine and ranitidine, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, on the secretion and electrolyte content of CSF was examined. Fifty cats were divided into one control (n = 6) and six experimental groups. CSF was collected by puncture of the cisterna magna following pentobarbital anesthesia, and its volume, concentrations of Na+, K+, Cl-, and pH were determined. Cimetidine or ranitidine (50, 20, or 10 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 2 h after the start of the test, and their concentrations were measured in hourly blood samples and in 30-min aliquots of CSF in the 50 mg/kg experimental groups. Whereas the secretion of CSF did not change over 6 h in the control group, it decreased significantly by 30-60 min after injection of cimetidine or ranitidine and remained low for the following 6 1/2 h in all experimental groups except the 10-mg ranitidine group. Peak cimetidine and ranitidine concentrations in CSF in the 50-mg experimental groups were noted 60 and 90 min, respectively, after intravenous injection. CSF electrolyte concentrations and pH did not change during the test in any group. We conclude that intravenous cimetidine or ranitidine can significantly reduce CSF secretion in the cat, possibly by competitive inhibition of the histamine effect on H2 receptors located on the choroid plexus epithelial cell, or by a direct effect on the capillaries of the choroid plexus.     

Prevention of gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: controlled trial of ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients requiring one of the following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: naproxen, piroxicam, diclofenac, and indomethacin. In addition, risk factors were studied in order to help in targeting of such treatment to specific groups of patients. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, parallel group with endoscopic assessments at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. SETTING: Multicentre outpatient study at secondary referral centres in five European countries. PATIENTS--297 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis over the age of 18 without lesions in the stomach and duodenum at baseline endoscopy (after one week without taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Those taking other antirheumatic agents, concomitant ulcerogenic drugs, or treatment for peptic ulcers within the previous 30 days were excluded. Age, sex, arthritic disease, and type of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used were comparable in the two treatment groups. In all, 263 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo (plus the selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was prescribed within five days after the baseline endoscopy for two consecutive periods of four weeks. Paracetamol was permitted during the study, but not antacids. Patients were withdrawn if the most severe grade of damage (including ulceration) was found at the four week endoscopy or when indicated, or with lesser damage at the investigator''s discretion. END POINT: Frequency of gastric and duodenal ulceration or lesions, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of peptic ulceration by eight weeks was 10.3% (27/263); 2 out of 135 (1.5%) developed duodenal ulceration in the ranitidine group, compared with 10 out of 126 (8%) taking placebo. The frequency of gastric ulceration was the same (6%) for the two groups at eight weeks. Though significantly fewer gastric lesions developed in the ranitidine group by eight weeks. The frequency of non-ulcerative lesions in the duodenum did not differ greatly for the two groups at either time point. Twelve out of 75 (16%) patients taking piroxicam developed peptic ulceration, of whom two thirds had duodenal ulceration. Patients with a history of peptic ulcer were particularly susceptible to recurrent ulceration, against which ranitidine offered some protection. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the incidence of duodenal ulceration but not gastric ulceration when prescribed concomitantly with one of four commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Effect of daily oral omeprazole on 24 hour intragastric acidity.

Twenty four hour intragastric acidity was measured in nine patients with duodenal ulcer before and after one week of treatment with oral omeprazole 30 mg daily, a drug that inhibits gastric secretion by inhibition of parietal cell H+K+ adenosinetriphosphatase (ATPase). Omeprazole virtually eliminated intragastric acidity in all patients: the median 24 hour intragastric pH rose from 1.4 to 5.3 and the mean hourly hydrogen ion activity fell from 38.50 to 1.95 mmol(mEq)/1 (p less than 0.001). This inhibition of 24 hour intragastric acidity is more profound than that previously reported with either cimetidine 1 g daily or ranitidine 300 mg daily.     

Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: double blind controlled study of intermittent treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine. The European Study Group

ObjectiveTo assess intermittent treatment over 12 months in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.DesignRandomised, multicentre, double blind, controlled study. Patients with heartburn and normal endoscopy results or mild erosive changes received omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Patients remaining symptomatic had omeprazole 10 mg or ranitidine dose doubled for another 2 weeks while omeprazole 20 mg was continued for 2 weeks. Patients who were symptomatic or mildly symptomatic were followed up for 12 months. Recurrences of moderate or severe heartburn during follow up were treated with the dose which was successful for initial symptom control.SettingHospitals and primary care practices between 1994 and 1996.Subjects677 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.Results704 patients were randomised, 677 were eligible for analyses; 318 reached the end of the study with intermittent treatment without recourse to maintenance antisecretory drugs. The median number of days off active treatment during follow up was 142 for the entire study (281 for the 526 patients who reached a treatment related end point). Thus, about half the patients did not require treatment for at least 6 months, and this was similar in all three treatment groups. According to outcome, 378 (72%) patients were in the best outcome ranks (no relapse or one (or more) relapse but in remission until 12 months); 630 (93%) had three or fewer relapses in the intermittent treatment phase. Omeprazole 20 mg provided faster relief of heartburn. The results were similar in patients with erosive and non-erosive disease.ConclusionsIntermittent treatment is effective in managing symptoms of heartburn in half of patients with uncomplicated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is simple and applicable in general practice, where most patients are seen.

Key messages

• Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal disease can be managed successfully in half of patients with intermittent treatment with antisecretory drugs
• Omeprazole 20 mg once daily gives more rapid relief of symptoms than either omeprazole 10 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. However, the choice of antisecretory drug has little effect on the overall outcome
• Relapses are relatively infrequent and can be managed with short courses of repeat treatment
• Starting intermittent treatment with omeprazole 20 mg once daily is more cost effective than a dose titration approach with omeprazole 10 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily
• An intermittent treatment strategy is simple and applicable in general practice, where most of these patients are seen

     

Prophylactic effect of cimetidine in duodenal ulcer disease.

Fifty-seven symptom-free patients with duodenal ulcer entered a double-blind trial to assess the prophylactic effect of cimetidine. Patients were randomly allocated to receive cimetidine 400 mg twice daily (29 patients) or placebo (28 patients). The trial was designed to imitate daily clinical practice, so duodenal ulcer disease was diagnosed by means of x-ray examination. Three patients from each group withdrew from the trial. All remaining patients continued to receive treatment for 12 months or until symptoms recurred. Three out of 26 patients suffered relapses during cimetidine treatment, compared with 20 out of 25 receiving placebo. No side effects were attributable to cimetidine. Long-term cimetidine treatment had no curative effect as relapses occurred soon after treatment was stopped. The estimated chance (cumulative remission rate +/- 2 SE) of remaining symptom-free 13 weeks after one year''s cimetidine treatment had been completed was 47 +/- 21%. Maintenance treatment with cimetidine is a suitable alternative to elective in surgery in patients with duodenal ulcer subjects frequent relapses. Further study is needed to establish the optimal duration and safety of prolonged cimetidine treatment.     

Effect of cimetidine, ranitidine and omeprazole on postprandial gastrin and somatostatin release in conscious dogs

During a first series of experiments, the gastrin responses to a meal were measured and compared to the responses seen after administration of cimetidine (2.5 mg/kg/h) or omeprazole (2 mg/kg). During a second series of experiments the effects of cimetidine (2.5 mg/kg/h), ranitidine (0.5 mg/kg/h) and omeprazole (2 mg/kg) on post-prandial gastrin and somatostatin release were determined in experiments during which the intragastric pH was maintained close to 6.4. During a third series of experiments, the effects of cimetidine (2.5 mg/kg/h) and omeprazole (2 mg/kg) on basal gastrin and somatostatin release were estimated. Postprandial gastrin release was increased by cimetidine and by omeprazole. When acidification of the gastric content was prevented by intragastric titration, postprandial gastrin release was increased by about 100%. No further increase was observed when the animals were concomitantly treated with cimetidine, ranitidine or omeprazole. Intragastric titration did not alter postprandial somatostatin release. Concomitant administration of H2 blockers decreased the somatostatin response to the meal, while concomitant administration of omeprazole did not alter this release. No significant changes were observed in basal gastrin or somatostatin levels after administration of cimetidine or omeprazole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The clinical and economic efficacies of short courses of azithromycin in acute sinusitis]

A randomized study of a 3-day course of azithromycin therapy (500 mg once daily) vs. a 10-day course of co-amoxiclav therapy (625 mg thrice daily) in patients with acute sinusitis was performed with an account of the GCP criteria. One hundred patients in 2 groups each of 50 persons were enrolled. The estimates of the patient body temperature, headache, pain on palpation in the area of the accessory nasal sinuses, nasal cavity stuffing, nasal discharge nature and the nose mucous membrane appearance were recorded prior to the treatment, in 72 hours and on the 10th-12th and 26th-30th days of the treatment. The microbiological analysis of the punctate from the accessory nasal sinuses was undertaken before the antibiotic therapy and 72 hours after its start. The economic analysis included the cost of the antibiotic therapy course, hospitalization term, medical manipulations and laboratory tests as well as the cost/efficacy index. The frequency of the relapses within 6 months after the cure was estimated in the two groups compared. In 72 hours and on the 10th-12th days after the treatment start the efficacy of azithromycin was significantly higher than that of co-amoxiclav. The cure was stated in 41 (82 per cent) and 26 (52 per cent) patients on the 10th-12th days, in 6 (12 per cent) and 21 (42 per cent) patients the improvement was stated and the fail was stated in 3 (6 per cent) and 2 (4 per cent) patients respectively. The efficacy of the drugs on the 26th-30th days after the treatment start did not differ. The isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes were the main pathogens. The bacteriologic eradication was recorded in 29 (90.6 per cent) patients treated with azithromycin and only in 18 (69.2 per cent) patients treated with co-amoxiclav. Adverse reactions and relapses of the disease within 6 months after the cure were more frequent in the patients treated with co-amoxiclav. The cost of the azithromycin therapy was significantly lower. It was shown that the shortened course of the azithromycin therapy provided earlier cure of the patients with acute sinusitis, better tolerance of the drug, less frequent adverse reactions, lower cost as compared to the use of co-amoxiclav and no relapses.     

Serum concentration of prolactin, gastrin and glycocholic acid in patient with peptic ulcer treated with ranitidine

In 66 patients with peptic ulcer (11 with gastric ulcer, 55 with duodenal ulcer, 19 women, 47 men) the serum concentrations of prolactin, dehydrocholic acid and gastrin were determined. The studies were repeated after treatment with ranitidine: in 50 patients after three weeks and in 40 patients after another 30 days. During the first period ranitidine 2 x 150 mg was administered, while during the second period the dose was 1 x 150 mg. The results were compared with those obtained from 120 healthy subjects. Before starting the treatment prolactin levels were significantly higher than those in the control group. During the treatment a significant decrease of the levels was observed. Similar changes of prolactin concentrations were found in the group of 39 men with duodenal ulcer isolated from the studied patients, who were compared with a group of 50 healthy men. It was not found that the development of peptic ulcer and the treatment with ranitidine exerted and effect on the changes of gastrin and dehydrocholic acid concentrations.     

Interaction of H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine with microsomal drug metabolizing and other systems in liver.

Cimetidine has been demonstrated to impair microsomal oxidative drug metabolizing and other enzyme systems in mouse liver. The inhibition is rapid, occurring after a single administration and also found to be dose-dependent. It is more significant after daily administration for 15 days. Enzyme inhibition by ranitidine, another H2-receptor antagonist was comparatively less at all the concentrations of the drug tested. An increased activity of alkaline phosphatase, glutamate-pyruvate and glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase was observed in liver with cimetidine administration, whereas that of lactate and succinate dehydrogenase was inhibited only after administration of 2000 mg cimetidine per kg body weight. Except alkaline phosphatase other enzymes were unaffected after ranitidine administration. Analysis of lipid classes in liver showed that phospholipid, triglycerides and free fatty acid contents were significantly decreased in drug administration while cholesterol level showed very little or no change. Microsomal and soluble protein contents were significantly increased which probably indicate that the inhibition in the enzyme activity by histamine H2-receptor antagonists may be a lipid mediated process and not resulted from the reduced availability of the enzyme protein.