DNA lysis is involved in the simplified fluorescence plus Giemsa method for differential staining of sister chromatids

The DNA labelling of the bifilarly 5-bromodeoxyuridine- to-substituted chromatid decreased relative to that of the unifilarly substituted chromatid with increasing duration of HB pretreatment (Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55° C). Sister chromatid differential staining was detected by Giemsa as well as a DNA-specific dye, ethidium bromide, after 4 s of HB pretreatment. The contrast of sister chromatid differential staining was improved with increased duration of HB pretreatment or by incubation with exonucleases. Hydrogen donors such as cysteamine, cysteine, and L-ascorbic acid inhibited the HB pretreatment, but this inhibition could be overcome by increasing the duration of HB pretreatment.     

Reverse sister chromatid differential staining by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250

A sister chromatid differential staining pattern is observed if chromosomes replicate for two cycles in the presence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) and are subsequently stained in Hoechst 33258, irradiated with black light, and then stained in Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. In this pattern the chromatids containing DNA that is bifilarly substituted with BrdUrd are darkly stained and the chromatids with DNA that is unifilarly substituted are lightly stained. This staining pattern is the reverse of that found when slides are stained in Hoechst plus Giemsa. Slides stained with either Giemsa or Coomassie Blue can be destained and restained repeatedly with the other stain to alternate the pattern observed.     

Different effects of 33258 Hoechst and DAPI in fluorescent staining of sister chromatids differentially substituted with bromodeoxyuridine

Summary After substitution with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for two rounds of replication, chromosomes in cytological preparations stained with 33258 Hoechst show upon epiluminescence an immediate differential sister chromatid fluorescence. When stained with DAPI, however, which has a structural resemblance to part of the 33258 Hoechst molecule, such a differential pattern of fluorescence was only induced after some delay. Upon restaining with the same dye the differential fluorescence appeared instantly. In preparations double stained with ethidium bromide and 33258 Hoechst the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids with 33258 Hoechst was not accompanied by a differential staining with ethidium bromide. Once a differential staining was obtained with DAPI in preparations double stained with ethidium bromide and DAPI, the ethidium bromide pattern also appeared to be differential upon subsequent observation. No differentiation could be obtained with ethidium bromide alone. The observations described in the case of 33258 Hoechst staining are in agreement with a molecular quenching by BrdUrd without gross structural consequences for the DNA. In the case of DAPI staining, however, there occurs a differential photolysis of BrdUrd-substituted DNA. Besides the nature, most likely the size, of the fluorochrome molecules themselves, the state of the fixed chromatin appeared also to play a role in determining the mechanism of the sister chromatid differentiation: after prolonged incubation in buffer, BrdUrd-containing chromosomes stained with 33258 Hoechst showed a differential staining evidently caused by photolysis, indicating that they had become more susceptible to light.     

Mechanism of differential staining of BUdR-substituted Vicia faba chromosomes.

Chromosomes of the broad bean Vicia faba were isolated and air-dried on slides after incorporation of BUdR into DNA (BUdR substitution) for two rounds of replication. Then the preparations were embedded in a buffer solution containing trypsin as well as fluorescence dye (acridine orange or Hoechst 33258). We observed chromosomes with a fluorescence microscope at various times after embedding. After about 15 min one sister chromatid of some of the metaphase chromosomes showed enhanced darkening and disintegration within 1–4 min (melting effect) during observation. We suppose that fragmentation of BUdR-substituted DNA by the acridine orange-visible light system in acridine orange staining and by irradiation with wavelengths around the transition from UV to visible light in Hoechst 33258 staining is responsible for this phenomenon. The disintegration of one sister chromatid in BUdR-substituted chromosomes can also be produced by UV irradiation during trypsin treatment when fluorescence dyes are not present.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids was obtained by treating chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) with Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55 degrees C (HB pretreatment) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, II, or micrococcal nuclease. In this staining pattern the BrdU bifilarly substituted chromatids were darkly and the unifilarly substituted chromatids lightly stained. This staining pattern was obtained only by staining the HB-DNase I-treated chromosomes with Giemsa and methylene blue, not by several other dyes tested. Relatively more DNA labelling was removed from the non-BrdU-substituted than the BrdU-substituted chromosomes, when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were digested with DNase I. But the protein labelling was not removed appreciably in the same treatment. The differential DNase I sensitivity between the non-BrdU-substituted and BrdU-substituted chromosomes disappeared when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were incubated with proteinase K before The DNase I digestion. Moreover, no differential DNase I sensitivity was found between the HB-pretreated isolated DNA containing and not containing BrdU. We propose that during the HB pretreatment, more DNA-protein cross-linkings are induced in BrdU bifilarly substituted than the unifilarly substituted chromatids. This structure protects the chromosomal DNA against the DNase I digestion. Thus, a reverse differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids is obtained by the HB-DNase I treatment.     

The role of chromosomal proteins in the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids by light

Summary Fixed chromosomes of human lymphocytes, cultured in the presence of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during two cell cycles, were exposed to near-ultraviolet irradiation, stained with Giemsa, and after destaining, were subjected to either Coomassie Blue or Feulgen-Schiff staining. A differential reaction of sister chromatids was first revealed by Coomassie Blue staining. Differential staining with Giemsa required a longer irradiation time. This appeared to be reduced after the addition of dithiodipyridine to the cells during their last few hours of culture. The differential pattern obtained after Coomassie Blue staining was the inverse of that obtained after Giemsa staining. From these findings we concluded that the induction of sister chromatid differentiation by light in BrdU-substituted DNA containing chromosomes occurs primarily via chromosomal proteins, presumably by differential breakage of their disulphide bonds. The results of the Feulgen-Schiff staining indicated that differential depurination of BrdU-containing DNA could occur, although only after very prolonged irradiation. A faint though distinctly differential Feulgen-Schiff pattern of sister chromated staining, resulting from differential removal of DNA, was observed after photosensitization by specific DNA-binding dyes. Thus, DNA seems to be affected only under more extreme conditions.     

Factors involved in differential giemsa-staining of sister chromatids

Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium, temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength) of UV-light influenced the differential staining. Exposure of blacklight of 10^–5 M Hoechst 33528-stained BrdU-labeled chromosome specimens mounted in McIlvaine buffer (pH 8.0) at 50° C reproducibly allowed differential staining of sister chromatids within 15 min. On the other hand, Korenberg-Freedlender's method using no Hoechst 33258 was also UV-light-dependent. Thus, photolysis of BrdU-substituted DNA was considered the basic mechanism of the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.     

On the mechanism of differential giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids

This paper analyses the effect of acid hydrolysis on the differential Giemsa staining of 5-bromo-2deoxyuridine (BrdU) substituted chromatids in human and plant chromosomes, after treatment with a fluorochrome and light. Human lymphocytes and Allium cepa L. root tips were grown in BrdU for two or three cell cycles. Lymphocyte spreadings and meristem squashes were treated with fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, exposed to sunlight, hydrolysed with 5N HCl and stained with Giemsa. This acid hydrolysis improves the differential staining of BrdU substituted and non-substituted chromatin. It also allows the differentiation of sister chromatids with the DNA specific dye azure-A.     

Photosensitizing dyes and fluorochromes as substitutes for 33258 Hoechst in the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) chromosome technique

Using Allium cepa chromosomes after 5-bromo, 2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, we studied several acid and basic dyes and fluorochromes for their potential as substitutes for 33258 Hoechst in the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) technique. All of the dyes and fluorochromes investigated showed a photosensitizing capacity which was slightly lower than 33258 Hoechst in the cases of daunomycin, phloxin, fluorescein, thioflavine T and nuclear fast red, and somewhat higher in the case of eosin Y. Observation and cytophotometric analysis of differentially Giemsa-stained sister chromatids when eosin Y was used as the photosensitizing agent revealed the unsubstituted chromatid to be reddish violet in colour (absorption maximum, 550 nm), while the BrdU-substituted chromatid was blue or pale violet blue (absorption maximum, 580 nm). These results indicate that eosin Y is a useful photosensitizing dye which could be used as a substitute for 33258 Hoechst in the FPG staining technique.     

Sister chromatid exchange in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus

Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) studies have been performed in a variety of animals, both in vitro and in vivo, as well as in plants. To date, no such studies have been performed in any member of the gerbil sub-family (Gerbillinae). A new sister chromatid differential staining method was used with mice in vivo and has now been applied to the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. With some modifications, this in vivo method was found to be highly reproducible in gerbils, and had consistently produced many metaphase cells with clear sister chromatid differentiation. The method involves subcutaneous implantation of a 50 mg slow-release BrdU pellet, the fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, phosphate buffering at pH 6.8, and incandescent light exposure.     

Late replicating bands of human chromosomes demonstrated by fluorochrome and Giemsa staining.

The addition of thymidine (TdR) to cells growing in a medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) at the end of the first replication cycle results in the incorporation of TdR into the late replicating DNA regions. These sites can be visualized by staining the metaphase chromosomes with the fluorescent dye "33258 Hoechst" or a "33258 Hoechst" Giemsa procedure. A sequence of late replication patterns has been established in metaphase chromosomes of cultured human peripheral lymphocytes. The patterns are in agreement with those obtained by the standard autoradiographic procedures, but are more accurate. As is known from autoradiography, late replicating bands are in the position of G or Q bands. The "33258 Hoechst" Giemsa staining procedure of chromosomes which have replicated in the presence of BUdR first and in TdR for the last 2 hrs of the S phase is preferable to the currently used Giemsa banding techniques: the method yields very well banded metaphases in all preparations examined, as the chromosome structure is not disrupted by the pretreatment. The bands are very distinct, even in the "difficult" chromosomes (e.g. No. 4, 5, 8 and X). In female cells the late replicating X chromosome can be identified by its size and staining pattern. In addition to the replication asynchrony, the sequence of replication within both X chromosomes in female cells is not absolutely identical. The phenomenon of a phase difference in replication between the homologues is not a peculiarity of the X chromosome, but can be found in all autosomes as well as in homologous positions on the chromatids of individual chromosomes.     

Rapid irradiation procedure for obtaining permanent differential staining of sister chromatids and aspects of its underlying mechanism

Summary When fixed metaphase preparations of lymphocytes cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are subjected to a 1-min simple irradiation treatment with near-ultraviolet light (radiation dose 3×10⁵ J/m²), subsequent Giemsa staining produces differential staining of sister chromatids irrespective of previous exposure to a photosensitizer. The effects of this procedure were analyzed by irradiating single metaphases under the microscope, thus allowing precise dosage of radiation: Metaphase were subsequently stained with Giemsa and then subjected to the Feulgen-Schiff procedure. Whereas in the presence of DAPI as a photosensitizer a differential breakdown of BrdU-containing DNA in the chromatids under the influence of irradiation appeared to be the cause of sister chromatid differentiation, alterations presumably in the higher oeder structure of chromatin, not accompanied by removal of DNA, induced sister chromatid differentiation without DAPI.     

Restrictive distribution of asymmetric C-bands in the chromosome complement of the rhesus (Macaca mulatto)

Lymphocyte chromosomes from a cercopithecoid species, Macaca mulatta, were studied for the occurrence of lateral asymmetry in constitutive heterochromatin. The technique consisted of growing the lymphocytes for one cell cycle in BrdUrd, staining with 33258 Hoechst, exposing them to UV light, treating them with 2 SSC and staining with Giemsa. This procedure revealed asymmetric staining in the region of constitutive heterochromatin of the nucleolar organizer marker chromosome (no. 13 of the complement). In these chromosomes, the darkly staining region was confined at any given point to a single chromatid, while the corresponding region on the sister chromatid was lightly stained. This pattern of asymmetric staining in the constitutive heterochromatic region was not observed in any other chromosome of Macaca mulatta. The lateral asymmetry of constitutive heterochromatin in this species is presumed to reflect the strand bias in the distribution of thymine in the alphoid DNA fractions.     

Replacement of serum with a defined medium increases beta-adrenergic receptor number in cultured glioma cells

Lymphocyte chromosomes from a cercopithecoid species, Macaca mulatta, were studied for the occurrence of lateral asymmetry in constitutive heterochromatin. The technique consisted of growing the lymphocytes for one cell cycle in BrdUrd, staining with 33258 Hoechst, exposing them to UV light, treating them with 2 SSC and staining with Giemsa. This procedure revealed asymmetric staining in the region of constitutive heterochromatin of the nucleolar organizer marker chromosome (no. 13 of the complement). In these chromosomes, the darkly staining region was confined at any given point to a single chromatid, while the corresponding region on the sister chromatid was lightly stained. This pattern of asymmetric staining in the constitutive heterochromatic region was not observed in any other chromosome of Macaca mulatta. The lateral asymmetry of constitutive heterochromatin in this species is presumed to reflect the strand bias in the distribution of thymine in the alphoid DNA fractions.     

Mouse-human heterokaryon analysis with a 33258 Hoechst-Giemsa technique

The bibenzimidazol derivative 33258 Hoechst can be used to distinguish microfluorometrically between mouse and human nuclei in heterokaryons. This affords a quick and accurate alternative to autoradiography in the analysis of such heterokaryons. The 33258 Hoechst fluorescence patterns can be converted after irradiation to a Giemsa rendition of the differential staining.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography

Chinese hamster ovary cells grown for two rounds of DNA replication in the presence of BrdUrd contain sister chromatids that fluoresce differentially when stained with Hoechst 33258. If such fluorescent treatments are followed by incubation in 2 X SSC or water at 62° C and staining in 3% Giemsa, the chromosomes now contain one dark (unifilarly substituted) chromatid and one light (bifilarly substituted) chromatid, i.e. are harlequinized. These preparations do not fade and can be studied without resorting to fluorescence microscopy. Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE's) are seen with great clarity and resolution; and all the chromosomes in a cell can be scored, which is contrary to the usual experience with autoradiography. It was found that a) the yield of SCE's is dependent upon the concentration of BrdUrd in which the cells are grown and that the maximum number of SCE's that can occur spontaneously is 0.15 per chromosome per division cycle, b) the yield of SCE's doubles if the cells are exposed to visible light that can cause the photolysis of BrdUrd-containing DNA, and c) chromosomes that appear isolabelled in autoradiographic preparations come from observable multiple exchanges and are not the result of the segregation of DNA from a binemic chromosome. Furthermore, the staining patterns obtained in endoreduplicated cells clearly confirm that the polynucleotide strands of the DNA segregate into sister chromatids as though the newly synthesized strands were laid on the outside of the replicating double helix.     

Photosensitizing dyes and fluorochromes as substitutes for 33258 Hoechst in the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) chromosome technique

Summary UsingAllium cepa chromosomes after 5-bromo, 2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, we studied several acid and basic dyes and fluorochromes for their potential as substitutes for 33258 Hoechst in the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) technique. All of the dyes and fluorochromes investigated showed a photosensitizing capacity which was slightly lower than 33258 Hoechst in the cases of daunomycin, phloxin, fluorescein, thioflavine T and nuclear fast red, and somewhat higher in the case of eosin Y. Observation and cytophotometric analysis of differentially Giemsa-stained sister chromatids when eosin Y was used as the photosensitizing agent revealed the unsubstituted chromatid to be reddish violet in colour (absorption maximum, 550 nm), while the BrdU-substituted chromatid was blue or pale violet blue (absorption maximum, 580 nm). These results indicate that eosin Y is a useful photosensitizing dye which could be used as a substitute for 33258 Hocchst in the FPG staining technique     

Improved light sources for induction of sister chromatid differentiation

Various light sources, including ultraviolet light, mercury, germicidal, fluorescent, and incandescent lamps, were studied for their ability to induce sister chromatid differentiation (SCD) in rat bone marrow cells. The light sources were used along with Hoechst 33258 and Giemsa stains for SCD induction. When those lamps which emit significant amounts of heat were used, 60 degrees C incubation in 2X SSC was found to be unnecessary for SCD induction. A high wattage lamp, a high ambient temperature, a short distance between the lamp and the slides, or a light with 360 nm wavelength, minimized the required exposure time to the light. The pH value of the mounting buffer was also a significant factor. Fluorescent black light and incandescent lamps were found to be ideal light sources for SCD induction.     

Two opposite types of sister chromatid differential staining in BUdR-substituted chromosomes using tetrasodium salt of EDTA

The direct staining of BUdR-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a 4Na-EDTA-Giemsa solution resulted in a B-dark type of sister chromatid differential staining (SCD) in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained dark. On the other hand, when BUdR-substituted chromosomes were pretreated with a 4Na-EDTA solution and then stained with Giemsa, a B-light type SCD was obtained in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained light.     

Comparison between morphological and staining characteristics of live and dead eggs of Schistosoma mansoni

Schistosoma mansoni eggs are classified, according to morphological characteristics, as follows: viable mature and immature eggs; dead mature and immature eggs, shells and granulomas. The scope of this study was to compare the staining characteristics of different morphological types of eggs in the presence of fluorescent labels and vital dyes, aiming at differentiating live and dead eggs. The eggs were obtained from the intestines of infected mice, and put into saline 0.85%. The fluorescent labels were Hoechst 33258 and Acridine Orange + Ethidium Bromide and vital dyes (Trypan Blue 0.4% and Neutral Red 1%). When labelled with the probe Hoechst 33258, some immature eggs, morphologically considered viable, presented fluorescence (a staining characteristic detected only in dead eggs); mature eggs did not present fluorescence, and the other types of dead eggs, morphologically defined, showed fluorescence. As far as Acridine Orange + Ethidium Bromide are concerned, either the eggs considered to be live, or the dead ones, presented staining with green color, and only the hatched and motionless miracidium was stained with an orange color. Trypan Blue was not able to stain the eggs, considered to be dead but only dead miracidia which had emerged out of the shell. Neutral Red stained both live and dead eggs. Only the fluorescent Hoechst 33258 can be considered a useful tool for differentiation between dead and live eggs.