The use of DNA-cellulose for analyzing histone-DNA interactions. Discovery of nucleosome-like histone binding to single-stranded DNA.

In this report, we introduce the use of DNA-cellulose chromatography for evaluating the strength of binding of histones to DNA under a variety of conditions. We have found that histones added directly to DNA-cellulose at physiological salt concentrations bind relatively weakly, with all histones eluting together at about 0.5 M NaCl when a salt gradient is applied. However, much tighter binding of the four nucleosomal histones to DNA-cellulose is obtained if gradual histone-DNA reconstitution conditions are used. In this case, the binding of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 to DNA-cellulose closely resembles their binding to native chromatin. The nativeness of the binding is indicated both by the distinctive sodium chloride elution profile of these histones from DNA-cellulose and by their relative resistance to trypsin digestion when DNA-bound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, which have had the first 20 to 30 amino acid residues removed from their NH2 termini, is indistinguishable from the binding to DNA-cellulose of the same intact histones, as judged by their salt elution profile. Thus, even though the NH2 termini contain 40 to 50% of the positively charged amino acid residues (thought to interact with the DNA backbone), a major contribution to the DNA binding comes from the remainder of the histone molecule. Finally, we have discovered that histones can form a "nucleosome-like" complex on single-stranded DNA. The same complex does not appear to form on RNA. Histones H3 and H4 play a predominant role in organizing this histone complex on single-stranded DNA, as they do on double-stranded DNA in normal nucleosomes. We suggest that, in the cell nucleus, nucleosomal structures may form transiently on single strands of DNA, as DNA and RNA polymerases traverse DNA packaged by histones.     

The mechanism responsible for reciprocal BrdU-Giemsa staining

Cytological and biochemical experiments were undertaken to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the reciprocal Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions subjected to high or low pH NaH₂PO₄ treatments. These experiments included staining of chromosome preparations with ethidium bromide (EB), acridine orange (AO), or dansyl chloride, digestion of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromatin with pancreatic DNase I, and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the proteins extracted from, and those remaining in isolated, fixed, air-dried nuclei subjected to either NaH₂PO₄ treatment. The collective evidence from this and previous work clearly indicates that, although the staining reactions following the different pH treatments are reciprocal, the mechanisms of induction of the staining effects are not. After the high pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions are palely and intensely stained with Giemsa, respectively. This treatment preferentially solubilizes BrdU-substituted DNA, probably as a result of the photolysis or high temperature hydrolysis of BrdU-DNA. Concomitantly, this treatment selectively denatures the BrdU-DNA. The reduction in the amount of DNA in the BrdU regions leads to a quantitative decrease in Giemsa-dye binding, resulting in pale staining relative to unsubstituted regions. The extraction of BrdU-substituted DNA does not appear to simultaneously extract much chromosomal protein. After the low pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted regions appear intensely and palely stained with Giemsa, respectively. BrdU substitution greatly increases the binding affinity of histone H1 to DNA, and the low pH treatment preferentially extracts the less tightly bound H1 of the unsubstituted chromatin. This extraction of H1 is presumably responsible for the preferential dispersion of unsubstituted DNA outside the boundaries of the chromosome onto the surrounding area of the slide. The unsubstituted chromosome regions subsequently stain relatively palely with Giemsa, because the DNA in these regions is more dispersed than that in the BrdU-substituted regions. The low pH treatment concomitantly denatures the unsubstituted DNA.     

Differences among subfractions of H1 histone in retention of linear and superhelical DNA on filters

Four kinds of rabbit thymus H1 histone differ among themselves in their ability to retain DNA on nitrocellulose filters. This is true for linear, or superhelical DNA, but the order of effectiveness of the different H1 histones depends on the physical conformation of the DNA. For linear DNA the binding efficiencies of the H1 histones are: RTL2 = RTL3 greater than RTL4 greater than RTL1. This order of effectiveness parallels the effectiveness of the H1 histones previously found for the condensation of linear DNA as observed by circular dichroism and viscosity. The binding efficiencies of the various histones toward superhelical DNA were: RTL4 greater than RTL3 greater than RTL1 greater than RTL2. The variation in amino acid sequence between different rabbit thymus H1 histones might thus introduce structural variations in nucleohistone fibers and perhaps in chromatin.     

The effect of poly(ADP-ribose) on interactions of DNA with histones H1, H3 and H4

The competition between poly(ADP-ribose) and DNA for binding of the histones H1, H3 and H4 was studied, using a membrane filter-binding test. Poly(ADP-ribose) differently affected the interaction between DNA and the individual histones. While poly(ADP-ribose) effectively competed with DNA for binding of histone H4, it equally competed with DNA for binding of histone H3 and only inefficiently competed with DNA for binding of histone H1. Moreover, preformed complexes were correspondingly affected by the addition of competing polynucleotides, thereby also indicating the reversibility of complex formation. The competition capacity of DNA for histone H4 binding did not depend on DNA size. Competition experiments with poly(A) also indicated that poly(ADP-ribose) preferentially affected DNA-histone H4 interaction. The significance of the differing binding properties is discussed with regard to the possible molecular function of poly(ADP-ribose), especially with regard to its potential effect on nucleosome structure.     

Photochemical cross-linking of histones to DNA nucleosomes.

Ultraviolet (UV)-induced cross-linking was utilized in order to identify histone-DNA interacting regions in the chromatin repeating unit. Fractionated mononucleosomes which contained 185 base pairs of DNA and a full complement of the histones, including histone H1, were irradiated with light of lambda greater than 290nm in the presence of a photosensitizer. Equimolar amounts of histones H2A and H2B were found, by two independent labeling experiments, to be cross-linked to the DNA. Based on previous finding that the UV irradiation specifically cross-links residues which are in close proximity, irrespective of the nature of the amino acid side chain or the nucleotide involved, our results indicate that the four core histones are not positioned equivalently with respect to the DNA. This arrangement allows histones H2A and H2B to preferentially cross-link to the DNA. A water soluble covalent complex of DNA and histones was isolated. This complex was partially resistant to mild nuclease digestion, it exhibited a CD spectrum similar to that of chromatin, and was found to contain histone H1. These results are compatible with a model which suggests that histone H1, though anchored to the linker, is bound to the DNA at additional sites. By doing so it spans the whole length of the nucleosome and clamps together the DNA fold around the histone core.     

Triiodothyronine nuclear receptor. Role of histones and DNA in hormone binding

The triiodothyronine (T3) nuclear receptor was previously shown to lose rapidly its high affinity hormone-binding property after a partial purification from the nuclear extract. It was then found that histones + DNA added to the incubation medium with labeled T3 could restore, at least in part, the high affinity T3 binding. We now demonstrate that DNA alone increases the high affinity T3 binding site concentration moderately, and only at low ionic strength where it can bind to the receptor. Total histones and all histone fractions studied (total core histones, F2a, H2B, H3, H4, H1) specifically increase, at low concentrations, the level of T3 binding; but higher concentrations of some individualized histones, particularly arginine-rich histones, have an inhibitory effect. DNA, or several other polynucleotides, in the presence of histones increase the stimulating histone effect and reverse the inhibitory effect into a true activation. Histones increase the number of T3 binding sites but decrease the affinity for T3; addition of DNA restores the high affinity for T3 and stabilizes the T3-receptor complexes. Thus, some of the histone molecules could play a role in the maintenance of the T3 binding site, but multiple interactions between histones or with DNA seem necessary to impair the negative effect exerted by other parts of the histone molecules. Whether these positive and negative effects of histones on the T3 binding site are of biological relevance in the regulation of T3 binding to its receptor remains to be determined.     

Histone modifications in simian virus 40 and in nucleoprotein complexes containing supercoiled viral DNA.

Simian virus (SV40) nucleoprotein complexes containing circular supercoiled viral DNA were extracted from infected cells and purified by differential centrifugation. The protein content of these complexes was compared by electrophoresis on 15% acrylamide gels with the protein content of purified SV40 virions and with histones from virus-infected cells. The electrophoretic patterns of histones from each of the sources revealed several major differences. SV40 virions contained histones H3, H2B, H2A, and H4 but not H1. Nucleoprotein complexes and host cells contained all five major histone groups. Relative to cellular histones, virion and nucleoprotein complex histones were enriched 15 to 40% in histones H3 and H4. In addition to the major classes of histones, several subfractions of histones H1, H3, and H4 were observed in acrylamide gels of proteins from SV40 virions and viral nucleoprotein complexes. Acetate labeling experiments indicated that each subfraction of histones H3 and H4 had a different level of acetylation. The histones from SV40 virions and nucleoprotein complexes were acetylated to significantly higher levels than those of infected host cells. No apparent differences in phosphorylation of the major histone groups were observed.     

Selective interaction of 5'-bromodeoxyuridine substituted DNA with different chromosomal proteins.

Chromosomal proteins selectively interact with 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) substituted DNA relative to unsubstituted DNA. The relative affinities of chromosomal proteins for BrdUrd-DNA and unsubstituted DNA were measured by both thermal chromatography on hydroxylapatite and selective retention on nitrocellulose filters. Certain chromosomal proteins have a high affinity for hydroxylapatite; thus, during thermal chromatography of chromatin, the single-stranded DNA component percolates across a bed of adsorbed proteins as it elutes. We have measured the relative affinities of Brd-Urd-DNA and normal DNA for chromosomal proteins by chromatographing appropriate mixtures on hydroxylapatite. The results show that, under these conditions, the histone components, rather than the nonhistone chromatin proteins, retard the BrdUrd-substituted DNA. In addition, the individual histones vary in the degree of their affinity for BrdUrd-DNA in the order H3 greater than H4 greater than H2A greater than H2B greater than H1. We have used the property that protein-DNA complexes have a preferential affinity for nitrocellulose filters over naked DNA to measure the selective binding of BrdUrd-DNA and unsubstituted DNA's to both histone and nonhistone chromosomal proteins at low temperatures. The histones selectively retained BrdUrd-DNA on filters in the order H4 greater than H2A greater than H3 greater than H2B greater than H1. Using this assay, the nonhistones displayed greater selectivity toward BrdUrd-DNA than the histone fraction. We interpret these results to mean BrdUrd-containing DNA has a specific affinity for certain chromosomal proteins with BrdUrd-DNA may be the basis for selective inhibition of cytodifferentiation by the thymidine analogue, BrdUrd.     

The nature of interactions responsible for the differences in the affinities of histones for DNA

Electrophoretic studies on the sequential binding of histones to DNA and to polyphosphate in low ionic strength solution have shown that the affinities of histones for both the polyanions decreases in the same order: H4 ～ H3 > H2A > H2B>H1. This permits to suggest that hydrophobic DNA-histone interactions do not determine the relative affinity of histones for DNA. Non-ionic interactions within and between histone molecules participate in determining the histone affinity for DNA affecting electrostatic DNA-histone interactions.     

Association of nucleosome core particle DNA with different histone oligomers. Transfer of histones between DNA-(H2A,H2B) and DNA-(H3,H4) complexes

In non-denaturing low ionic strength gels, the titration of core DNA with H2A,H2B produces five well-defined bands. Quantitative densitometry and cross-linking experiments indicate that these bands are due to the successive binding of H2A,H2B dimers to core DNA. Only two bands are obtained with DNA-(H3,H4) samples. The slower of these bands is broad and presumably corresponds to two complexes containing one and two H3,H4 tetramers, respectively. In gels of higher ionic strength, DNA-(H2A,H2B) samples produce an ill-defined band, suggesting that the lifetime of the complexes containing H2A,H2B is relatively short. However, the low intensity of the free DNA band observed in these gels indicates that most of the DNA is associated with H2A,H2B. In agreement with this, our results obtained using different techniques (sedimentation, cross-linking, trypsin and nuclease digestions, and thermal denaturation) demonstrate that the association of H2A,H2B with core DNA occurs in free solution in both the absence and presence of NaCl (0.1 to 0.2 M). The low mobilities of DNA-(H2A,H2B) complexes, together with sedimentation and DNase I digestion results, indicate that the DNA in these complexes is not folded into the compact structure found in the core particle. Furthermore, non-denaturing gels have been used to study the dynamic properties of DNA-(H2A,H2B) and DNA-(H3,H4) complexes in 0.2 M-NaCl. Our results show that: (1) H2A,H2B and H3,H4 can associate, respectively, with DNA-(H3,H4) and DNA-(H2A,H2B) to produce complexes containing the four core histones; (2) DNA-(H2A,H2B) and DNA-(H3,H4) are able to transfer histones to free core DNA; (3) an exchange of histone pairs takes place between DNA-(H2A,H2B) and DNA-(H3,H4) and produces complexes with the same histone composition as that of the normal nucleosome core particle; and (4) although both histone pairs can exchange, histones H2A,H2B show a higher tendency than H3,H4 to migrate from one incomplete core particle to another. The complexes produced in these reactions have the same compact structure as reconstituted core particles containing the four core histones. Our kinetic results are consistent with a reaction mechanism in which the transfer of histones involves direct contacts between the reacting complexes. The possible participation of these spontaneous reactions on the mechanism of nucleosome assembly is discussed.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Dynamics of Nucleosome Assembly and Effects of DNA Methylation

The nucleosome is the fundamental packing unit of the eukaryotic genome, and CpG methylation is an epigenetic modification associated with gene repression and silencing. We investigated nucleosome assembly mediated by histone chaperone Nap1 and the effects of CpG methylation based on three-color single molecule FRET measurements, which enabled direct monitoring of histone binding in the context of DNA wrapping. According to our observation, (H3-H4)₂ tetramer incorporation must precede H2A-H2B dimer binding, which is independent of DNA termini wrapping. Upon CpG methylation, (H3-H4)₂ tetramer incorporation and DNA termini wrapping are facilitated, whereas proper incorporation of H2A-H2B dimers is inhibited. We suggest that these changes are due to rigidified DNA and increased random binding of histones to DNA. According to the results, CpG methylation expedites nucleosome assembly in the presence of abundant DNA and histones, which may help facilitate gene packaging in chromatin. The results also indicate that the slowest steps in nucleosome assembly are DNA termini wrapping and tetramer positioning, both of which are affected heavily by changes in the physical properties of DNA.     

Triiodothyronine nuclear receptor: Role of histones and DNA in hormone binding

The triiodothyronine (T₃) nuclear receptor was previously shown to lose rapidly its high affinity hormone-binding property after a partial purification from the nuclear extract. It was then found that histones + DNA added to the incubation medium with labeled T₃ could restore, at least in part, the high affinity T₃ binding. We now demonstrate that DNA alone increases the high affinity T₃ binding site concentration moderately, and only at low ionic strength where it can bind to the receptor. Total histones and all histone fractions studied (total core histones, F2a, H2B, H3, H4, H1) specifically increase, at low concentrations, the level of T₃ binding; but higher concentrations of some individualized histones, particularly arginine-rich histones, have an inhibitory effect. DNA, or several other polynucleotides, in the presence of histones increase the stimulating histone effect and reverse the inhibitory effect into a true activation. Histones increase the number of T₃ binding sites but decrease the affinity for T₃; addition of DNA restores the high affinity for T₃ and stabilizes the T₃-receptor complexes. Thus, some of the histone molecules could play a role in the maintenance of the T₃ binding site, but multiple interactions between histones or with DNA seem necessary to impair the negative effect exerted by other parts of the histone molecules. Whether these positive and negative effects of histones on the T₃ binding site are of biological relevance in the regulation of T₃ binding to its receptor remains to be determined.     

The same amount of DNA is organized in in vitro-assembled nucleosomes irrespective of the origin of the histones.

The four histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 from calf thymus, CHO and sea urchin gastrula cells were associated by stepwise dialysis from 2 M NaCl with SV40 DNA Form I. The in vitro-assembled chromatins were visualized by electron microscopy and the size of the DNA fragments generated by digestion with DNase II was determined. Irrespective of the origin of the histones, the size of the smallest DNA band generated at early times of digestion was about 190 base pairs, whereas oligomeric DNA bands were multiples of 140 bp. These results support our previous proposal that the four histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 are able to organize more than 140 bp of DNA, but do not provide any evidence that the variability of histones H2A and H2B plays a role in the variability of the DNA repeat length of native chromatins.     

Nonhistone Scm3 binds to AT-rich DNA to organize atypical centromeric nucleosome of budding yeast

The molecular architecture of centromere-specific nucleosomes containing histone variant CenH3 is controversial. We have biochemically reconstituted two distinct populations of nucleosomes containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae CenH3 (Cse4). Reconstitution of octameric nucleosomes containing histones Cse4/H4/H2A/H2B is robust on noncentromere DNA, but inefficient on AT-rich centromere DNA. However, nonhistone Scm3, which is required for Cse4 deposition in?vivo, facilitates in?vitro reconstitution of Cse4/H4/Scm3 complexes on AT-rich centromere sequences. Scm3 has a nonspecific DNA binding domain that shows preference for AT-rich DNA and a histone chaperone domain that promotes specific loading of Cse4/H4. In live cells, Scm3-GFP is enriched at centromeres in all cell cycle phases. Chromatin immunoprecipitation confirms that Scm3 occupies centromere DNA throughout the cell cycle, even when Cse4 and H4 are temporarily dislodged in S phase. These findings suggest a model in which centromere-bound Scm3 aids recruitment of Cse4/H4 to assemble and maintain an H2A/H2B-deficient centromeric nucleosome.     

Histones H3 and H2a are homologous to the lambda repressor and cro proteins in 22 residue segments implicated in DNA binding

The histones H3 and H2a from calf thymus are homologous to the repressor and cro repressor proteins of bacteriophage lambda in a 22-residue segment that has been implicated by mutational and model-building studies in DNA binding. In the lambda proteins this segment is folded into a helix-turn-helix unit of supersecondary structure, and we propose that the homologous regions in the histones possess the same fold. Homology was quantified with a unified procedure based on criteria of identity of key residues, primary structural homology and similarity of secondary structural potential. It has previously been shown that a set of other prokaryotic DNA-binding proteins have primary structural homology with the two lambda proteins. Homologies detected between the histones H4 and H2b and members of this set suggest that these histones also contain the putative DNA-binding fold.