The assembly of regularly spaced nucleosomes in the Xenopus oocyte S-150 extract is accompanied by deacetylation of histone H4

Histone proteins, which were assembled into chromatin using the Xenopus oocyte S-150 extract, were analyzed on acid-urea gels and Triton-acid-urea gels to determine their state of modification. We find that histone H4, which is present in a diacetylated form in the oocyte S-150, gradually loses its acetate groups as the DNA is packaged into chromatin. Thus, this process parallels the one observed in vivo during chromatin formation in growing eucaryotic cells. Histone H4 deacetylation in the oocyte S-150 is a DNA-dependent reaction. This reaction is blocked when butyrate (an inhibitor of histone deacetylase) is added at the onset of the chromatin assembly process. When butyrate is added at the end of the assembly process, no de novo acetylation of the nucleosomal histone H4 is observed. Chromatin with regularly spaced nucleosomes, displaying periodicities ranging from 160 to 220 base pairs, can be assembled in vitro with the oocyte S-150 (Rodríguez-Campos, A., Shimamura, A., and Worcel, A. (1989) J. Mol. Biol., in press). This chromatin may contain either deacetylated histone H4 when assembled under standard conditions or diacetylated H4 when assembled in the presence of butyrate. Both types of chromatin display identical structures upon digestion with nucleases. The potential applications of this system toward the study of the naturally occurring diacetylated histone H4 are discussed.     

Regulation of histone synthesis during early Urechis caupo (Echiura) development

The histones present in mature oocytes and embryos of Urechis caupo and their pattern of synthesis during early development have been characterized. Acid-soluble proteins extracted from mature oocyte germinal vesicles and from embryonic nuclei were analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Histones are accumulated in the mature oocytes in amounts sufficient to provide for the assembly of chromatin through the 32- to 64-cell stage of embryogenesis. Two H1 histones, which appear to be variants, were found. Germinal vesicles and cleavage-stage nuclei are enriched in H1M (maternal). During late cleavage a faster-migrating H1, H1E (embryonic), appears among the nuclear histones and, as embryogenesis continues, replaces H1M as the predominant H1. No new core histone variants are detected during early development. Examination of [³H]lysine-labeled histones from germinal vesicles and embryonic nuclei reveals stage-specific patterns of histone synthesis. H1M is the major H1 species synthesized in mature oocytes. After fertilization, a switch to the predominant synthesis of H1E occurs. Comparison of the [³H]lysine incorporated into H1E and core histones indicates that H1E synthesis is disproportionately high from midcleavage through the midblastula stage. By the gastrula stage, a balanced synthesis of H1E and each core histone is established. The results indicate that there is noncoordinate regulation of H1 and core histone synthesis during Urechis development.     

Histone modifications accompanying the onset of developmental commitment

In the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, three cell types comprise the 16-cell stage embryo: micromeres, macromeres, and mesomeres. We have analyzed these three cell types for nuclear proteins that were synthesized during the earliest stages of embryonic development. The most striking differences in composition of newly synthesized proteins were found between the micromeres, which are the most committed cell type, and the macromeres and mesomeres. First, the micromeres lacked triply modified forms of histone H3; the levels of doubly modified forms of H3 were also greatly reduced. In contrast, micromeres were enriched in a band which migrated at the position of unmodified, unacetylated, histone H3 protein. Second, the overall distribution of H2A histone variants differed among the three cell types. Compared with macromeres and mesomeres, micromeres had a higher ratio of alpha-stage to cleavage-stage (CS) histone H2A; the micromere nuclei were depleted by 50 and 35%, respectively, in embryonically synthesized histone CS-H2A. Third, micromeres displayed different profiles of H1 histones. (a) They contained a cleavage-stage H1 histone which migrated faster than that of macromeres and mesomeres. This protein displays the electrophoretic behavior expected for a protein with reduced levels of posttranslational covalent modification. (b) Micromeres also had reduced levels of an H1 histone (designated H1 alpha a) band found in the alpha-H1 region of macromeres and mesomeres. These changes in chromatin modification correlate with the degree of commitment of cells in the developing embryo; they may reflect differing activities of the chromatin modifying enzymes in the various cell types at the 16-cell stage. Thus, the newly synthesized chromatin proteins of the individual blastomere types already differ in the developing sea urchin by the 16-cell stage. We suggest that variations in histone subtypes and in the levels of activity of chromatin modifying enzymes, e.g., acetylases and phosphorylases, could be involved in commitment and differentiation of different cell types.     

Fate of newly synthesized histones shortly after interruption of DNA replication

The synthesis and association of histones with chromatin were studied using MH-134SC cells in suspension culture. Cultures containing approximately equal numbers of cells were pulse-labeled with [3H]lysine at various times after the interruption of DNA synthesis with hydroxyurea. Each culture was mixed with a fixed volume of a culture generally labeled with [14C]lysine at the time of harvesting. Acid-soluble proteins extracted from different subcellular fractions of cells labeled under various conditions were compared by electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gels containing acetic acid and urea. All types of chromatin histones were labeled nearly equally as [14C]marker histones by a 15 min pulse under normal conditions, except that a considerable portion of pulse-labeled H4 was in highly acetylated forms. Addition of hydroxyurea at the start of the pulse markedly reduced the labeling of H3 and H4, but affected the labeling of the other histones only slightly. When DNA synthesis was inhibited before the start of the pulse, labeling of all histones decreased significantly. The addition of hydroxyurea was found to cause transient accumulation of newly synthesized proteins in the cytoplasmic soluble fraction; these were characterized as H3 and H4 from their metabolic properties and their electrophoretic mobilities on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. The results suggest that association of newly synthesized H3 and H4 histones is closely coupled with ongoing DNA replication. The implications of the results for the mechanism of formation of new nucleosomes are discussed.     

The inheritance of histone modifications depends upon the location in the chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Histone modifications are important epigenetic features of chromatin that must be replicated faithfully. However, the molecular mechanisms required to duplicate and maintain histone modification patterns in chromatin remain to be determined. Here, we show that the introduction of histone modifications into newly deposited nucleosomes depends upon their location in the chromosome. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, newly deposited nucleosomes consisting of newly synthesized histone H3-H4 tetramers are distributed throughout the entire chromosome. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3-K4), a hallmark of euchromatin, is introduced into these newly deposited nucleosomes, regardless of whether the neighboring preexisting nucleosomes harbor the K4 mutation in histone H3. Furthermore, if the heterochromatin-binding protein Sir3 is unavailable during DNA replication, histone H3-K4 methylation is introduced onto newly deposited nucleosomes in telomeric heterochromatin. Thus, a conservative distribution model most accurately explains the inheritance of histone modifications because the location of histones within euchromatin or heterochromatin determines which histone modifications are introduced.     

Interaction of benzo[alpha]pyrene diol-epoxide with nuclei and isolated chromatin.

Chicken erythrocyte chromatin and nuclei were labeled with benzo[alpha]-pyrene (B[alpha]P) diol-epoxide (anti) and digested with micrococcal nuclease to mono- and dinucleosomes. Analysis of the distribution of the carcinogen showed that the internucleosomal region bound 3-4 times more carcinogen per unit DNA than did nucleosomes. The enhanced binding of the 'ultimate' carcinogen to the internucleosomal region was similar when isolated chromatin or nuclei were used for in vitro labeling. Furthermore, isolation of the histone core proteins, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, revealed that only 15% of the carcinogen was associated with the histones and that the majority of the carcinogen was bound to chromosomal DNA. Fluorography of purified nucleosomal histones showed that the covalent association of the carcinogen was mainly with histones H3 and H2B.     

Influence of histone acetylation on the solubility, H1 content and DNase I sensitivity of newly assembled chromatin.

In a previous report [Annunziato, A.T. and Seale, R.L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:12675] a novel intermediate in chromatin assembly was described (detected by labeling new DNA in the presence of the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate), which retained approximately 50% of the heightened sensitivity of newly replicated chromatin to DNaseI. It is now reported that nucleosomes replicated in butyrate are considerably more soluble in the presence of magnesium, relative to chromatin replicated under control conditions, and that this heightened magnesium-solubility is reflected in a concomitant increase in the preferential solubility of nucleosomes containing newly synthesized core histones. This differential solubility was accompanied by a 5- to 6-fold depletion of histone H1, and was completely abolished by the selective removal of H1 from isolated nuclei. The removal of H1 also markedly reduced the preferential DNaseI sensitivity of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Further, when mononucleosomes of control and (acetylated) nascent chromatin were compared, no differences in DNaseI sensitivity were detected. These results provide evidence that the interactions between newly assembled nucleosomes and histone H1 are altered when histone deacetylation is inhibited during chromatin replication, and suggest a mechanism for the control of H1 deposition during nucleosome assembly in vivo.     

Histones and nucleosomes in Cancer sperm (Decapod: Crustacea) previously described as lacking basic DNA-associated proteins: a new model of sperm chromatin

To date several studies have been carried out which indicate that DNA of crustacean sperm is neither bound nor organized by basic proteins and, contrary to the rest of spermatozoa, do not contain highly packaged chromatin. Since this is the only known case of this type among metazoan cells, we have re-examined the composition, and partially the structure, of the mature sperm chromatin of Cancer pagurus, which has previously been described as lacking basic DNA-associated proteins. The results we present here show that: (a) sperm DNA of C. pagurus is bound by histones forming nucleosomes of 170 base pairs, (b) the ratio [histones/DNA] in sperm of two Cancer species is 0.5 and 0.6 (w/w). This ratio is quite lower than the proportion [proteins/DNA] that we found in other sperm nuclei with histones or protamines, whose value is from 1.0 to 1.2 (w/w), (c) histone H4 is highly acetylated in mature sperm chromatin of C. pagurus. Other histones (H3 and H2B) are also acetylated, though the level is much lower than that of histone H4. The low ratio of histones to DNA, along with the high level of acetylation of these proteins, explains the non-compact, decondensed state of the peculiar chromatin in the sperm studied here. In the final section we offer an explanation for the necessity of such decondensed chromatin during gamete fertilization of this species.     

The modification of stored histones H3 and H4 during the oogenesis and early development of Xenopus laevis

In amphibian development large amounts of histone are accumulated at early stages and used in assembling nuclei at later stages, when cell proliferation is rapid. The acetate groups on stored H3 and H4 molecules turn over. In the oocyte nucleus H4 exists primarily in a diacetylated state, whereas it probably exists in a phosphorylated form in the cytoplasm. This represents, at steady state, what is normally a transitory stage in the transport of newly synthesized H4 into chromatin. Stored H3 of the oocyte has acetylated, and probably phosphorylated forms, in the same proportions as is normally seen in the chromatin of somatic cells. The various forms of H3 occur in similar proportions in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the oocyte. H3 does not therefore need to associate with DNA to be acetylated, even though the appearance of modified forms of H3 in cultured cells is seen only after the incorporation of H3 into chromatin.     

Histone methylation. Its occurrence in different cell types and relation to histone H4 metabolism in developing trout testis.

Histone methylation in developing trout testis has been observed in the diploid stem cells and primary spermatocytes, which actively synthesize DNA and histones. In spermatids, histone methylation is minimal and so probably plays no role in the replacement of histones by protamine which is characteristic of this cell type. No turnover of histone methyl groups could be detected over several hours, so that unlike acetylation or phosphorylation of histones, methylation in this tissue appears to be a stable, irreversible modification. When histone H4, labeled with [14C]methyl groups, is separated on starch gels into acetylated and phosphorylated derivatives, [14C]methyl label does not appear in positions characteristic of newly synthesized histone H4, i.e. the highly acetylated (di-, tri-, and tetra-acetylated), unphosphorylated species. [14C]Methyl label appears rather in the unphosphorylated, and unacetylated or monoacetylated species, shifting with time to the monophosphorylated form of histone H4. These data suggest a temporal sequence of events for histone H4: synthesis, then acetylation and deacetylation, followed by methylation and phosphorylation. Occurring late after histone synthesis and assembly into chromatin, histone methylation might then be necessary for histone interactions with other molecules (e.g. histone phosphokinase) prior to mitosis.     

Yeast chromatin: Search for histone H1

Summary Yeast chromatin, isolated by a rapid procedure contains in addition to histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 a fifth major basic protein. This fifth polypeptide is not an intrinsic component of the nucleosome structure. It has properties of both histone and nonhistone proteins and might represent an early form of histone H1 and of high mobility group nonhistone proteins of higher eukaryotes.Electron microscopic visualization of isolated yeast nucleosomes substantiates further the similarity of the chromatin structure of this unicellular eukaryote to that of higher eukaryotes.     

Distinct effects of histone H1 and non-histone chromosomal proteins on the structure of nucleosomes and the chromatin fibre in solution

In this study we attempt to differentiate between the effects of the non-histone chromosomal proteins and histone H1 on the structure of the nucleosomes and the chromatin fibre in solution. The properties of chromatin preparations with different histone H1 and non-histone protein compositions were compared using circular dichroism and flow linear dichroism and the following conclusions were drawn. When histone H1 is absent the non-histone proteins partially prevent the unfolding of the nucleosomes at low ionic strength. The complete blocking of this unfolding, however, is accomplished only in the presence of histone H1. The non-histone proteins do not affect the orientation of the nucleosomes along the fibre axis. Only histone H1 can maintain the positive anisotropy of the chromatin fibre.     

Unravelled nucleosomes,nucleosome beads and higher order structures of chromatin: Influence of non-histone components and histone H1

Effects of non-histone components and histone H1 on the morphology of nucleosomes and chromatin were studied by electron microscopy. Soluble rat liver ehromatin was depleted of non-histone components [NH]or non-histone components and H1 [NH and H1] by dissociation and subsequent fractionation in sucrose gradients in the presence of 300 to 350 mm or 500 mm-NaCl, respectively. In reconstitution experiments the depleted samples were mixed either with [NH] or with [NH and H1] or with purified H1. The morphology of the ionic strength-dependent condensation of the samples was monitored by electron microscopy using 0 mm to 100 mm-NaCl. Based on the appearance of the different types of fibres in very low salt (0 mm up to 10 mm-NaCl), namely the zigzag-shaped, the beads-on-a-string or the DNA-like filaments, it is possible to distinguish between nucleosomes, partially unravelled nucleosomes and unravelled nucleosomes, respectively. Only those fibres which were zigzag-shaped at low ionic strength condense at increasing ionic strength into higher order structures of compact fibres. We demonstrate the dependence of the appearance of nucleosomes and chromatin upon its composition and upon the ionic strength of the solvent.[NH] have no detectable influence upon the formation of higher order chromatin structures, but they can prevent the unravelling of nucleosomes at very low ionic strength, presumably by charge shielding.For the appearance of zigzag-shaped fibres and for the condensation into compact fibres with increasing ionic strength, H1 must be present in about native amounts. Partial removal of H1 (about 10%) promotes a change from fibres into tangles. This supports the model that an H1 polymer is stabilizing the higher order chromatin structures.Reconstitution experiments with purified H1 regenerated fibres containing all the features of [NH]-depleted chromatin. Reconstitution experiments with [NH and H1] promoted fibres compatible with control chromatin. Overloading of chromatin with H1 led to additional condensation. The detailed morphology of the reconstituted fibres showed local distortions. One possibility explaining these local distortions would be competition between “main” and “additional” binding sites for histone H1.