Body condition influences maintenance of a persistent first wave dominant follicle in dairy cattle

The objective of this study was to determine whether plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4) from a controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) device (approximately 2 ng/ml) were adequate to sustain a persistent first wave dominant follicle (FWDF) in low body condition (LBC, body condition score [BCS] 1 = lean, 5 = fat [2.3 +/- 0.72, n = 4]) compared with high body condition (HBC, BCS = 4.4 +/- 0.12, n = 4) nonlactating dairy cows. On Day 7 of the estrous cycle (Day 0 = estrus), cows were treated with PGF2 alpha (25 mg i.m. Lutalyse, P.M., and Day 8 A.M.) and a used CIDR device containing P4 (1.2 g) was inserted into the vagina until ovulation or Day 16. Plasma was collected for P4 and estradiol (E2) analyses from Day 5 to Day 18 (or ovulation), and ovarian follicles were monitored daily by ultrasonography. Mean concentrations of plasma P4 were greater in HBC than LBC cows between Days 5 and 7 (4.6 > 3.4 +/- 0.37 ng/ml; P < 0.04). All LBC cows maintained the first wave dominant follicle and ovulated after removal of the CIDR device (18.3 +/- 0.3 d, n = 3; Cow 4 lost the CIDR device on Day 11 and ovulated on Day 15), whereas in the HBC cows ovulation occurred during the period of CIDR exposure (11.3 +/- 0.3 d; n = 3; a fourth cow developed a luteinized first wave dominant follicle that did not ovulate during the experimental protocol on Day 19). Mean day of estrus was 17 +/- 0.4 for LBC (n = 3) and 10 +/- 0.4 for HBC (n = 3) cows. Sustained concentrations of plasma E2 (12.9 +/- 2.8 pg/ml; Days 8 to 17) in LBC cows reflected presence of an active persistent first wave dominant follicle. The differential effect of BCS on concentrations of plasma P4 (y = ng/ml) was reflected by the difference (P < 0.01) in regressions: yLBC = 19.9 - 3.49x + 0.166x2 vs yHBC = 37.3 - 7.04x + 0.340x2 (x = day of cycle, Days 7 to 12). Although P4 concentration was greater for HBC cows prior to Day 8, a greater clearance of plasma P4 released from the CIDR device in the absence of a CL altered follicular dynamics, leading to premature ovulation in the HBC cows. A greater basal concentration of P4 was sustained in LBC cows that permitted maintenance of a persistent first wave dominant follicle.     

Effects of oestradiol and some of its esters on gonadotrophin release and ovarian follicular dynamics in CIDR-treated beef cattle

Three experiments were conducted to: (1) compare the effect of three oestradiol formulations on gonadotrophin release in ovariectomised cows; (2) compare the effects of either oestradiol-17beta (E-17beta) or oestradiol benzoate (EB), given at two doses, on the synchrony of ovarian follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated beef cattle; and (3) determine the timing of ovulation of the dominant follicle of a synchronised follicular wave following administration of E-17beta or EB 24h after progesterone withdrawal. In Experiment 1, ovariectomised cows (n = 16) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) and were allocated randomly to receive 5mg of E-17beta, EB or oestradiol valerate (EV) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. The CIDR inserts were removed on Day 7. There were effects of time, and a treatment-by-time interaction (P < 0.0001) for plasma concentrations of both oestradiol and FSH. Plasma oestradiol concentrations peaked 12h after treatment, with highest (P < 0.01) peak concentrations in cows given E-17beta; estradiol concentrations subsequently returned to baseline by 36 h in E-17beta-treated cows and by 96 h in EB- and EV-treated cows. Plasma FSH concentrations decreased by 12h after oestradiol treatment in all groups (P < 0.0001), reached a nadir at 24h, and increased by 60 h in all groups; plasma FSH reached higher (P < 0.02) concentrations in E-17beta-treated than in EB- or EV-treated cows. In Experiment 2, non-lactating Hereford cows (n = 29) received a new CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), and were assigned randomly to receive 1 or 5mg of E-17beta or EB i.m. on Day 1. On Day 8, CIDR were removed and PGF was given. Transrectal ultrasonography was done once daily from 2 days before CIDR insertion to 2 days after CIDR removal, and then twice-daily to ovulation. Although there was no difference among groups in the interval from oestradiol treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.2 +/- 0.3 days; P = 0.5), 5mg of E-17beta resulted in the least variable interval to wave emergence (P < 0.005), compared with the other treatment groups which were not different (P = 0.1). For the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation, there were no differences among groups for either means (P = 0.5) or variances (P = 0.1). In Experiment 3, beef heifers (n = 32) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. and were assigned randomly to receive 5mg E-17beta or 1mg EB i.m. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and all heifers received PGF. On Day 8 (24h after CIDR removal), each group was subdivided randomly to receive 1mg of either E-17beta or EB i.m. There was no effect of oestradiol formulation on interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.1 +/- 0.2 days; P = 0.7) or on the median interval (76.6h; P = 0.7) or range (72-120 h; P = 0.08) from CIDR removal to ovulation. In summary, oestradiol treatments suppressed FSH in ovariectomised cows, with the duration of suppression dependent on the oestradiol formulation. Both E-17beta and EB effectively synchronised ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in CIDR-treated cattle, and the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation did not differ in heifers given either E-17beta or EB 24h after CIDR removal.     

Comparison of the effect of estradiol benzoate plus progesterone and GnRH on the follicular wave emergence and subsequent follicular development in CIDR-treated, lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts

This study examined the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P4) as compared with GnRH on follicular wave emergence and follicular development, and synchrony of ovulation and pregnancy rates following a second injection of GnRH in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts. Lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts received a CIDR device, with an injection of 2mg EB plus 50mg P4 (EB+P4 group) or with an injection of 100 microg GnRH (GnRH group) at the beginning of the experiment (day 0). Thereafter, all received PGF(2alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 12/15 EB plus P4-treated and 14/15 GnRH-treated cows (P>0.05). The interval to wave emergence was longer in the EB+P4 group (4.8+/-0.4 days) than in the GnRH group (2.0+/-0.2 days). The mean diameters of preovulatory follicles and the proportion of cows with preovulatory follicles greater than 12 mm on day 9 did not differ between groups (P>0.05). The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations by 40 h after the GnRH injection on day 11 and pregnancy rates to TAI did not differ between the EB+P4 (13/15 and 36.7%) and the GnRH (14/15 and 53.3%) groups, respectively. Results suggest that a single treatment with EB plus P4 as compared with GnRH simultaneously with CIDR insertion in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts will result in relatively asynchronous emergence of a new follicular wave, but subsequently similar sizes of preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in similar pregnancy rates to TAI.     

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows and heifers resynchronized for a second insemination with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for 7 or 8d with estradiol benzoate injected at the time of device insertion and 24h after removal

One aim of this study was to compare the reproductive performance of cows and heifers when resynchronizing returns to estrus for a second insemination by treating with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (IVD) for 7 or 8d when estradiol benzoate (EB) was administered at the start of treatment and again 24h after device removal. An additional aim was to document the pattern of onset and characteristics of estrus with each resynchrony treatment. Lactating cows in three herds were synchronized for a first estrus and AI by treatment with an IVD for 8d, starting on Day 0, cloprostenol (0.5 mg im) at device removal and EB at device insertion (2.0 mg im) and 24h after removal (1.0 mg im). Cows were resynchronized for a second estrus starting on Day 23 by reinsertion of IVDs for 7 (IVD-7-EB; n=449) or 8d (IVD-8-EB; n=445) with EB (1.0 mg im) administered at device insertion and 24h after removal. Cows were resynchronized for a third estrus by administration of EB (1.0 mg im) on Day 46, but subsequent treatments (no further treatment, reinsertion of CIDR or administration of EB on Day 55) varied among herds as part of separate studies. Maiden heifers (7-Day, n=68; 8-Day, n=69) were similarly treated as cows in a separate herd, but doses of EB were always 1.0 mg im at device insertion and 0.75 mg im 24h after removal. Heifers were not resynchronized for a third estrus. Cattle were inseminated on detection of estrus at each synchronized estrus. Cumulative pregnancy rates 4 week (66.0%, 276/418 versus 59.1%, 247/418) and 7 week (72.7%, 304/418 versus 67.7%, 283/418) after the start of AI were greater (P<0.05) in the IVD-7-EB cows compared to the IVD-8-EB cows, respectively; this was associated with a 9% increase in conception rates at the second estrus (P=0.051) in the IVD-7-EB cows. Treatment did not significantly affect reproductive performance in heifers. Characteristics of estrus measured with radiotelemetry did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups, but more cows were detected in estrus 36 h after removal of IVDs in the IVD-8-EB cows compared to the IVD-7-EB cows (P<0.05). We concluded that reproductive performance in resynchronized dairy cows but not heifers was greater following resynchronization of estrous cycles after AI with an IVD for 7 compared to 8d when EB was injected at the start of treatment and 24h after device removal.     

The effect of a GnRH analogue on the dynamics of follicular development and synchronization of estrus in lactating cyclic dairy cows

A GnRH analogue was used to synchronize ovarian follicular development prior to an injection of PGF(2alpha) for the synchronization of estrus in lactating Holstein cows. On Day 12 (estrus = Day 0) of the experimental cycle, cows (n = 8) were injected with 8 mug Buserelin (BUS group), followed by 25 mg PGF(2alpha) 7 d later (Day 19). Control cows (n = 7) received PGF(2alpha) on Day 12 (PGF group). Ovaries were scanned daily via ultrasonography, and plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations were determined. Sizes of all visible follicles were recorded. Follicles were classified as small (3 to 5 mm), medium (6 to 9 mm), or large (>/= 10 mm). Between Days 12 and 16 of the cycle, the number of large follicles in PGF cows remained unchanged (1.2), whereas in the BUS group, the number of large follicles decreased from 1.3 on Day 12 to 0.5 on Day 15. Only 4 of 7 PGF cows ovulated a second-wave dominant follicle. In the BUS group, 7 of 8 cows ovulated a GnRH analogue induced dominant follicle that was first identified on Day 15. During the follicular phase (last 5 d prior to estrus), plasma progesterone declined in association with CL regression in both groups, and estradiol concentrations increased, reaching higher (P<.0.05) preovulatory peak concentration in BUS cows than in PGF cows (14.0 +/- 1.0 vs 10.4 +/- 1.1 pg/ml). The number of medium-size follicles was smaller and the number of small-size follicles tended to be higher in BUS cows than in the PGF-treated group. On the day of estrus, the size of the ovulatory follicle (16.1 vs 13.3 mm) and the size difference between the ovulatory and second largest follicle (11.4 vs 6.2 mm) were both larger in BUS cows than in PGF-treated cows, suggesting a more potent dominance effect of the ovulatory follicle in the BUS cows. This study suggests that a GnRH analogue can alter follicular development prior to synchronization of estrus with an injection of PGF(2alpha) in lactating dairy cows.     

Ovarian follicular development in Holstein cows following synchronisation of oestrus with oestradiol benzoate and an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert for 5-9 days and duration of the oestrous cycle and concentrations of progesterone following ovulation

The aim of this study was to determine if the duration of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) after treatment with oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the time of insertion and 24 h after removal would affect selected variables including: size of ovarian follicles at the time of removal of inserts, diameter of ovulatory follicles, plasma concentrations of progesterone following ovulation, and duration of the following oestrous cycle. Characteristics of oestrus at a synchronised and spontaneous oestrus were also monitored. Non-lactating Holstein cows were synchronised with an IVP(4) for 5 (n = 10), 7 (n = 10), 8 (n = 9) or 9 (n = 9) days together with injections of ODB at device insertion (2 mg) and 24 h after removal (1 mg). Ultrasonography showed no significant effect of treatment on the day of emergence of preovulatory follicles relative to the day of removal of inserts (overall mean = -4.22 +/- 0.58; P = 0.15) for cows that ovulated within 120 h insert removal (n = 36). Treatment with ODB and an IVP(4) for 5 days reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of inserts and for the following 2 days compared to cows treated for 7-9 days (mean difference 2.56 +/- 1.15 mm; P = 0.033) but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P = 0.21). Day of emergence relative to removal of inserts was associated with the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (R2 = 0.69; P < 0.001). Concentrations of progesterone and the diameter of the corpus luteum following ovulation were not affected by treatment (P > 0.20), but were affected by the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.01). Diameter of the ovulatory follicle did not affect interoestrous and interovulatory intervals (P > 0.40). We conclude that treatment with an IVP(4) for 5 compared to 7-9 days with ODB administered at device insertion, and 24 h after removal reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of the insert but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle or concentrations of progesterone in plasma. Emergence of preovulatory follicles closer to the time of removal of inserts reduced the diameter of the ovulatory follicle when oestrus was induced with ODB. Ovulation of smaller follicles reduced concentrations of progesterone in plasma following ovulation but did not affect oestrous cycle duration.     

The synchrony of prostaglandin-induced estrus in cows was reduced by pretreatment with hCG

The induction of optimal synchrony of estrus in cows requires synchronization of luteolysis and of the waves of follicular growth (follicular waves). The aim of this study was to determine whether hormonal treatments aimed at synchronizing follicular waves improved the synchrony of prostaglandin (PG)-induced estrus. In Experiment 1, cows were treated on Day 5 of the estrous cycle with saline in Group 1 (n = 25; 16 ml, i.v., 12 h apart), with hCG in Group 2 (n = 27; 3000 IU, i.v.), or with hCG and bovine follicular fluid (bFF) in Group 3 (n = 21; 16 ml, i.v., 12 h apart). On Day 12, all cows were treated with prostaglandin (PG; 500 micrograms cloprostenol, i.m.). In Experiment 2, cows were treated on Day 5 of the estrous cycle with saline (3 ml, i.m.) in Group 1 (n = 22) or with hCG (3000 IU, i.v.) in Group 2 (n = 20) and Group 3 (n = 22). On Day 12, the cows were treated with PG (500 micrograms in Groups 1 and 2; 1000 micrograms in Group 3). Blood samples for progesterone (P4) determination were collected on Day 12 (Experiment 1) or on Days 12 and 14 (Experiment 2). Cows were fitted with heat mount detectors and observed twice a day for signs of estrus. Four cows in Experiment 1 (1 cow each from Groups 1 and 2; 2 cows from Group 3) had plasma P4 concentrations below 1 ng/ml on Day 12 and were excluded from the analyses. In Experiment 1, cows treated with hCG or hCG + bFF had a more variable (P = 0.0007, P = 0.0005) day of occurrence of and a longer interval to estrus (5.9 +/- 0.7 d, P = 0.003 and 6.2 +/- 0.8 d, P = 0.005) than saline-treated cows (3.4 +/- 0.4 d). The plasma P4 concentrations on Day 12 were higher (P < 0.0001) in hCG- and in hCG + bFF-treated cows than in saline-treated cows (9.4 +/- 0.75 and 8.5 +/- 0.75 vs 4.1 +/- 0.27 ng/ml), but there was no correlation (P > 0.05) between plasma P4 concentrations and the interval to estrus. In Experiment 2, cows treated with hCG/500PG and hCG/1000PG had a more variable (P = 0.0007, P = 0.002) day of occurrence of and a longer interval to estrus (4.2 +/- 0.4 d, P = 0.04; 4.1 +/- 0.4 d, P = 0.03) than saline/500PG-treated cows (3.2 +/- 0.1 d). The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 and 14 of both hCG/500PG- and hCG/1000PG-treated cows were higher (P < 0.05) than in saline/500PG-treated cows (7.3 +/- 0.64, 0.7 +/- 0.08 and 7.7 +/- 0.49, 0.7 +/- 0.06 vs 5.3 +/- 0.37, 0.5 +/- 0.03 ng/ml). The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 or 14 and the interval to estrus were not correlated (P > 0.05) in any treatment group. The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 and 14 of hCG/500PG- or hCG/1000PG-treated cows were correlated (r = 0.65, P < 0.05; r = 0.50, P < 0.05). This study indicated that treatment of cows with hCG on Day 5 of the estrous cycle reduced the synchrony of PG-induced estrus and that this reduction was not due to the failure of luteal regression.     

Effects of estradiol and progestins on follicular regression before, during, and after follicular deviation in postpartum beef cows

The objective was to evaluate the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB), in association with three progestin protocols, on ovarian follicular regression of suckled beef cows treated at three stages of follicular development (pre-deviation, deviation, or post-deviation). Thirty-six suckled beef cows (60-90 d postpartum, given 125 μg cloprostenol on two occassions, 12 h apart). Forty-eight hours after the first cloprostenol treatment, all follicles >5 mm were ablated and transrectal ultrasound scanning (8 MHz) was performed every 24 h until Day 7 (Day 0 = treatment). When the largest follicle reached a designated diameter of 5-7, 8-10 or >10 mm, cows were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg of EB im in association with an intravaginal device containing 250 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) with or without 100 mg of progesterone (P₄) given im, or an intravaginal device containing P₄ (3 × 3 factorial design). Treatments induced follicular regression in all cows, independent of follicular stage or treatment. There was no interaction between progestin treatment and follicular stage, nor was there any difference in the time of follicular regression or new wave emergence among follicular stages. Treatment with MPA plus P₄ delayed follicular regression. In conclusion, EB in association with various progestins induced regression of growing follicles and emergence of a new follicular wave in postpartum beef cows, regardless of the stage of follicular development.     

Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate

We hypothesized that reducing the size of the ovulatory follicle using aspiration and GnRH would reduce the size of the resulting CL, reduce circulating progesterone concentrations, and alter conception rates. Lactating dairy cows (n=52) had synchronized ovulation and AI by treating with GnRH and PGF2alpha as follows: Day -9, GnRH (100 microg); Day -2, PGF2alpha (25 mg); Day 0, GnRH (100 microg); Day 1, AI. Treated cows (aspirated group; n=29) had all follicles > 4 mm in diameter aspirated on Days -5 or -6 in order to start a new follicular wave. Control cows (nonaspirated group: n=23) had no follicle aspiration. The size of follicles and CL were monitored by ultrasonography. The synchronized ovulation rate (ovulation rate to second GnRH injection: 42/52=80.8%) and double ovulation rate of synchronized cows (6/42=14.3%) did not differ (P > 0.05) between groups. Aspiration reduced the size of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.0001; 11.5 +/- 0.2 vs 14.5 +/- 0.4 mm), and serum estradiol concentrations at second GnRH treatment (P < 0.0002; 2.5 +/- 0.4 vs 5.7 +/- 0.6 pg/mL). The volume of CL was less (P < 0.05) for aspirated than nonaspirated cows on Day 7 (2,862 +/- 228 vs 5,363 +/- 342 mm3) or Day 14 (4,652 +/- 283 vs 6,526 +/- 373 mm3). Similarly, serum progesterone concentrations were less on Day 7 (P < 0.05) and Day 14 (P < 0.10) for aspirated cows. Pregnancy rate per AI for synchronized cows was lower (P < 0.05) for aspirated (3/21=14.3%) than nonaspirated (10/21=47.6%) cows. In conclusion, ovulation of smaller follicles produced lowered fertility possibly because development of smaller CL decreased circulating progesterone concentrations.     

Effect of early luteolysis in progesterone-based timed AI protocols in Bos indicus, Bos indicus x Bos taurus, and Bos taurus heifers

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) and estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular dynamics in Bos indicus (n=23), Bos taurus (n=25), and cross-bred (n=23) heifers. To assess the influence of reduced serum progesterone concentrations during 8 days of treatment with a progesterone-releasing device on follicular dynamics, half of the heifers received PGF at CIDR insertion (Day 0; 3 x 2 factorial design). Mean (+/-S.E.M.) serum progesterone concentrations during CIDR treatment varied (P<0.05) among genetic groups: B. indicus (5.4+/-0.1 ng/mL), B. taurus (3.3+/-0.0 ng/mL), and cross-bred (4.3+/-0.1 ng/mL). Maximum diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) was smaller (P<0.01) in B. indicus heifers (9.5+/-0.5 mm) than in cross-bred (12.3+/-0.4 mm) or B. taurus heifers (11.6+/-0.5 mm). B. indicus experienced lower (P<0.01) ovulation rate (39.1%) than did B. taurus (72.7%) and cross-bred (84.0%). Heifers treated with PGF on Day 0 had lower (P<0.05) serum progesterone concentrations during progesterone treatment. The PGF treatment on Day 0 increased (P<0.01) the diameter of the DF (11.9+/-0.4 mm vs. 10.5+/-0.4 mm). Moreover, greater (P=0.02) ovulation rates (78.8 vs. 54.0%) occurred in heifers treated with PGF on Day 0. In summary, B. indicus heifers had greater serum progesterone concentrations, smaller DF diameter, and a lower ovulation rate compared to B. taurus heifers. Prostaglandin treatment on the day of CIDR insertion reduced serum progesterone during treatment, and resulted in increased maximum DF diameter and ovulation rate.     

Ovarian follicular wave synchronization and induction of ovulation in postpartum beef cows

An experiment was designed to evaluate a) the effect of a progesterone-estradiol combined treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum beef cows, and b) ovulation and the subsequent luteal activity after short-term calf removal and GnRH agonist treatment. Multiparous Angus cows (25 to 40 d after calving) were assigned to the following treatments: untreated (Control, n = 9); short term calf removal (CR, n = 8); progesterone (CIDR, n = 9) and progesterone plus estradiol-17 beta (CIDR + E-17 beta, n = 9). Progesterone treatment (CIDR) lasted 8 d and the day of device insertion was considered as Day 0. Cows in the CIDR + E-17 beta group also received an i.m. injection of 5 mg of E-17 beta on Day 1. On Day 8, calves were removed for 48 h (CR, CIDR and CIDR + E-17 beta groups) and 6 h before the end of calf removal these cows also received an i.m. injection of 8 micrograms of Busereline (GnRH). Anestrus was confirmed in all cows by the absence of luteal tissue and progesterone concentrations below 1 ng ml-1 at the beginning of the experiment. Although mean (+/- SEM) interval from the beginning of the experiment (Day 0) to wave emergence did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups (Control, 1.9 +/- 1.0, range -2 to 7 d; CR, 3.9 +/- 0.7, range 0 to 6 d; CIDR, 2.8 +/- 0.5, range 0 to 4 d and CIDR + E-17 beta, 4.1 +/- 0.2, range 3 to 5), the variability was less (P < 0.05) in the CIDR + E-17 beta group. The proportion of cows ovulating 24 to 48 h after GnRH administration tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in cows from CIDR + E-17 beta group (8/9) than in those of CR (5/8) or CIDR (6/9) groups, respectively and was associated with a higher proportion (P < 0.05) of CIDR + E-17 beta treated cows (9/9) that had a dominant follicle in the growing/early static phase at the time of GnRH treatment compared to the other GnRH treated groups (5/8, and 4/9 for CR and CIDR groups, respectively). Two CR cows ovulated 0-24 h after GnRH and only one Control cow ovulated the day before the time of GnRH administration. Cows pretreated with progesterone had longer (P < 0.05) luteal lifespan (CIDR, 14.5 +/- 0.7, CIDR + E-17 beta, 13.9 +/- 0.6 d) than those not treated with CIDR (Control, 5, CR, 4.0 +/- 0.4). We conclude that progesterone plus estradiol treatment results in tightly synchronized wave emergence and high GnRH-induced ovulation rate with normal luteal activity in postpartum beef cattle.     

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate on ovarian follicular turnover in postpartum anoestrous cows and cows which have resumed oestrous cycles.

Two experiments were carried out to determine the effect of a low dose of progesterone (P) with and without the addition of an injection of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on ovarian follicle dynamics, oestradiol production and LH pulsatility in postpartum anoestrous cows, compared with cows which had resumed oestrous cycles (cycling cows). In the first experiment, anoestrous Jersey cows were treated with (AN+P, n=8) or without (AN-3, n=3) a previously used intravaginal progesterone releasing (CIDR) device for 10 days, commencing 3 or 4 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1) as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Contemporary cycling cows (CYC+P, n=8) were similarly treated with used CIDR devices and injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) at the time of device insertion. Follicle turnover was monitored by daily ultrasonography and pulsatile release of LH was measured on the ninth day after device insertion. During the period of CIDR device insertion, a second dominant follicle emerged in 4/8 of the CYC+P group and 7/8 of the AN+P group (P=0.14). Maximum diameter of DF1 was greater in cows in the CYC+P compared with the AN+P group (P=0.02), but did not differ between cows in the AN+P and AN-P groups (P>0.1). Frequency of LH pulses was greater in cows in the CYC+P than AN+P group (P=0.06), and in cows in the AN+P than AN-P group (P=0.02).In the second experiment, anoestrous (n=20) and cycling (n=11) Friesian cows were treated with a new CIDR device for 6 days commencing 3 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1). Cycling cows were also injected with PGF on the day of device insertion. Half of the cows in each group were injected with 2mg ODB on the day of device insertion. Daily ultrasonography was used to monitor follicular dynamics throughout the experimental period. Follicular turnover was increased by ODB in cycling (5/5 versus 1/6; P<0.05), but not anoestrous cows (5/9 versus 4/11). Persistence of DF1 was reduced by ODB treatment in both cycling and anoestrous cows (P<0.001). Maximum diameter of DF1 was influenced by ODB treatment and reproductive status (P<0.05). In anoestrous cows in which a second dominant follicle did not emerge during the period of device insertion, the interval from emergence of DF1 to emergence of a second dominant follicle was significantly delayed by treatment with ODB (P=0.04).In conclusion, P treatment of anoestrous cows increased pulsatile release of LH, but did not induce the development of persistent follicles. Injection of ODB in association with P treatment reduced the persistence of dominant follicles in both cycling and anoestrous cows, but delayed subsequent follicular development in a proportion of anoestrous cows.     

Persistent ovarian follicles in dairy cows: a therapeutic approach

Anestrus is common during the postpartum period in high-producing dairy cows. In a previous investigation, we were able to diagnose persistent follicles of 8 to 12 mm in anestrous cows. This report describes 2 consecutive studies. The objectives of the first were to 1) assess the association of persistent follicles with anestrus; and 2) evaluate 2 therapeutic treatments. In the second study, we compared the effectiveness of the best treatment established in Study 1 with the Ovsynch protocol. For Study 1, anestrous cows were considered to have a persistent follicle if it was possible to observe a single follicular structure > 8 mm in the absence of a corpus luteum or a cyst in 2 ultrasonographic examinations performed at an interval of 7 d. At diagnosis (Day 0), cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Cows in Group GnRH/PGF (n=17) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m., and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 14. Cows in Group PRID (n=18) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID, containing 1.55 g of progesterone) for 9 d and were given 100 microg GnRH i.m. at the time of PRID insertion, and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7. Cows in Group Control (n=18) received no treatment. The animals were inseminated at observed estrus and were monitored weekly by ultrasonography until AI or 5 weeks from diagnosis. Blood samples were also collected on a weekly basis for progesterone determination. The mean size of persistent follicles on Day 0 was 9.4 +/- 0.04 mm. Progesterone levels were < 0.2 ng/mL during the first 35 d in 16 of 18 Control cows. Cows in the PRID group showed a lower persistent follicle rate (16.7% < 70.6% < 88.9%; P < 0.0001; PRID vs GnRH/PGF vs Control, respectively); a higher estrus detection rate (83.3% > 29.4% > 11.1%; P < 0.0001) and a higher pregnancy rate (27.8% > 5.9% > 0%; P = 0.02). For the second study, 145 cows with persistent follicles were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: cows in Group Ovsynch (n=73) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day 0, 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7, and 100 microm GnRH i.m. 32 h later. Cows in this group were inseminated 16 to 20 h after the second GnRH dose (Ovsynch protocol). Cows in Group PRID (n=72) were treated as those in the PRID group of Study 1, and were inseminated 56 h after PRID removal. Cows in the PRID group showed a higher ovulation rate (84.8% > 8.2%: P < 0.0001); a higher pregnancy rate (34.2% > 4.1%; P < 0.0001) and lower follicular persistence rate (22.2% < 63%; P < 0.0001) than those in Ovsynch. Our results indicate that persistent follicles affect cyclic ovarian function in lactating dairy cows. Cows with persistent follicles can be successfully synchronized and time inseminated using progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha but show a limited response to treatment with GnRH plus PGF2alpha.     

Follicular wave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows

This study evaluated the effect of GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular wave emergence and progesterone concentrations, and following a second injection of GnRH, synchrony of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating Holstein cows. Cows received a CIDR device without hormone (controls), with an injection of 100 microg GnRH or with an injection of 4 mg EB. Thereafter, all received PGF(2 alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 19/20 GnRH-treated, 14/20 EB-treated and 5/20 control cows (P < 0.05). The interval to wave emergence was the shorter and less variable (P < 0.01) in the GnRH group (2.9 +/- 0.2 days) than in the EB (4.7 +/- 0.5 days) or control (4.8 +/- 1.0 days) groups. Serum progesterone concentrations from Days 4 to 7 were higher (P < 0.01) in the GnRH-treated cows that ovulated than in those that did not ovulate, or in control and EB-treated cows. The diameters of dominant follicle on Day 7 differed among groups (P < 0.01), and the diameters of the preovulatory follicle on Day 9 were larger (P < 0.01) in the control and GnRH groups than in the EB group. The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations did not differ among groups, but pregnancy rate to TAI was higher (P < 0.05) in the GnRH group (65%; 13/20) than in the control (30%; 6/20) or EB (35%; 7/20) groups. Results suggest that GnRH treatment of CIDR-treated lactating Holstein cows will result in synchronous follicular wave emergence, large preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in an acceptable pregnancy rates to TAI.     

Progesterone and follicular changes in postpartum noncyclic dairy cows after treatment with progesterone and estradiol or with progesterone, GnRH, PGF2alpha, and estradiol

A previous study showed that noncyclic dairy cows treated with 10 microg of GnRH and a progesterone-releasing CIDR insert on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2alpha and CIDR removal on Day 7, followed by 1 mg estradiol benzoate on Day 9 for those cows that still had not shown estrus (CGPE program) had higher conception rate (47% vs. 29%) than cows treated only with CIDR and estradiol benzoate as above (CE program). This study was to investigate the mechanisms by which the CGPE program improved conception rate compared with the CE program. Sixteen noncyclic Holstein-Friesian cows were randomly assigned to 2 groups balanced for the size and growth pattern of the dominant follicles, which were determined by ultrasonography over a 3-d period. One group received the above CGPE treatment, and the other group received the CE treatment. Follicular and luteal development were monitored by daily ultrasonography. Blood samples were collected daily from Day -2 to Day 11, and thereafter milk samples were collected thrice weekly for a further 24 d. Blood and milk samples were analyzed for progesterone. The GnRH treatment induced ovulation in 7 of 8 cows, resulting in elevated (P<0.05) progesterone concentrations between Days 4 and 7 for cows in the CGPE group. All induced CL underwent luteolysis by 24 h after PGF2alpha treatment. Within 5 d of CIDR removal, 7 of 8 cows in both the CE and CGPE groups ovulated. The interval from emergence of the ovulatory follicle to ovulation was similar (P=0.32) but less (P<0.05) variable for the CGPE group (9.0+/-0.3 d) compared with the CE group (10.3+/-1.2 d). Progesterone concentration in milk samples was similar between the two groups up to 10 d after ovulation. In summary, the GnRH treatment induced ovulation or turnover of dominant follicles, induced a synchronized initiation of a new follicular wave, and increased the progesterone concentration from 4 d after treatment. These could be the reasons for the increased conception rate of cows treated with the CGPE program.     

Comparison of two estrus synchronization and resynchronization treatments in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive performance in cows following synchronization of estrus with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVD) has varied with the length of treatment, cyclic status and prolonged return to estrus intervals in some cows following first AI. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of synchronizing and resynchronizing estrus on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Cows were treated with an IVD (Day 0) for 7 days (n = 350) or 8 days (n = 350), cloprostenol (0.5 mg i.m.) at the time of device removal and estradiol benzoate (EB) at the time of device insertion (1.5mg i.m.), and again 9 days later (1.0 mg i.m.). Cows were also resynchronized starting on Days 23 and 46 by reinsertion of IVDs for either 7 or 8 days and treatment with EB (1mg i.m.) at the time of device insertion and again 9 days later. Cows were inseminated on detection of estrus for 4 days after removal of devices at each of the synchronized estrous cycles. No significant differences in reproductive performance were detected between each treatment throughout the study period. Synchrony of estrus was more precise at the first and second estrus after treatment with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days. Cows classified as anestrous had lower reproductive performance than cows classified as cycling and had longer intervals to estrus at the second (P < 0.001) and third estrus (P < 0.06), but not at the first estrus (P = 0.09). Mean time to onset of estrus after IVD removal was less in cows treated with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days at each synchronized estrus (P < 0.01). More Holstein-Friesian cows were classified as non-pregnant and not detected in estrus than crossbreed cows (15.7%, 54/343 versus 9.0%, 24/266; [P < 0.05). The results of the study suggested that the main effects of the treatments that were used to synchronize and resynchronize estrus were to alter the timing and synchrony of estrus without affecting fertility.     

Ovarian superstimulation after follicular wave synchronization with GnRH at two different stages of the estrous cycle in cattle

The objective of this study was to evaluate superovulatory programs based on synchronization of follicular waves with GnRH at 2 different stages of the estrous cycle. Sixteen Holstein cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups and administered GnRH (Cystorelin, 4 ml i.m.) between Days 4 and 7 (Groups 1 and 3) or between Days 15 and 18 (Group 2) of the estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0). Four days after GnRH treatment, > or = 7-mm follicles were punctured in Groups 1 (n = 6) and 2 (n = 6) or were left intact in Group 3 (n = 4). All cows were superstimulated 2 d later (i.e., from Days 6 to 10 after GnRH treatment) with a total of 400 mg NIH-FSH (Folltropin-V) given twice daily in decreasing doses. The GnRH treatment caused a rapid disappearance of large follicles (P < 0.005), rapid decrease in estradiol concentrations (P < 0.003), and increase in the number of recruitable follicles (4 to 6 mm; P < 0.04), indicative of the emergence of a new follicular wave within 3 to 4 d of treatment. Between 4 and 6 d after GnRH treatment, the mean number of 4- to 6-mm follicles decreased (4.7 +/- 1.8 to 1.5 +/- 3.3) in the nonpunctured group but increased (3.9 +/- 1.0 to 7.3 +/- 1.9) in the punctured group of cows (P < 0.05). In response to FSH treatment, the increase in the number of > or = 7-mm follicles was delayed by approximately 2 d in the nonpunctured group (P < 0.006). Moreover, the mean number of > or = 7-mm follicles at estrus was higher (16.9 +/- 1.7 vs 11.5 +/- 3.0; P < 0.1) in the punctured than the nonpunctured group. The increase in progesterone concentration after estrus was delayed in the nonpunctured group (P < 0.1) compared with the punctured follicles. Mean numbers of CL as well as freezable (Grade 1 and 2) and transferable (Grade 1, 2 and 3) embryos were similar (P > 0.1) in punctured and nonpunctured groups. Spontaneous estrus did not occur prior to cloprostenol-induced luteolysis in any group, and stage of the estrous cycle during which GnRH was given did not affect (P > 0.1) hormonal and follicular responses in the punctured groups. In conclusion, GnRH given at different stages of the estrous cycle promotes the emergence of a follicular wave at a predictable time. Puncture of the newly formed dominant follicle increases the number of recruitable follicles (4 to 6 mm) 2 d later and, in response to superstimulation with FSH, causes a greater number and faster entry of recruitable follicles into larger classes (> or = 7 mm) and a faster postovulatory increase in progesterone concentrations.     

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol when starting treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert on ovarian follicular development and hormonal concentrations in Holstein cows

Ovarian follicular development and concentrations of gonadotrophin and steroid hormones were studied in non-lactating Holstein cows following administration of progesterone (P(4)) or oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the start of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) in a 2 by 2 factorial experiment. Cows were treated at random stages of the oestrous cycle with an IVP(4) device (Day 0) and either no other treatment (n=8), 200 mg of P(4) IM (n=9), 2.0 mg of ODB IM (n=8) or both P(4) and ODB (n=9). Seven days later devices were removed and PGF(2alpha) was administered. Twenty-four hours later 1.0mg of ODB was administered IM. Oestrus was detected in 97.1% and ovulation in 64.7% (effect of treatment, P=0.41) of cows within 96 h of removing inserts. In the cows that ovulated, day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle was delayed (P<0.01) and more precise (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to the cows treated with P(4). Interval from wave emergence to ovulation and the diameter of the ovulatory follicle was less (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to cows treated with P(4). Combined treatment with P(4) and ODB at the time of starting treatment with an IVP(4) device did not significantly change the pattern of ovarian follicular development compared to treatment with ODB alone. Concentrations of LH and FSH in plasma were less in cows treated with ODB between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05) while treatment with P(4) increased concentrations of FSH in plasma between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05). When anovulatory cows were compared to ovulatory cows, diameters of follicles (P<0.001) and growth rate of follicles (P<0.01) were less in anovulatory cows between Days 7 and 9, while concentrations of FSH in plasma were greater (P<0.01), concentrations of LH similar (P>0.90) and concentrations of oestradiol were less (P=0.01) in the anovulatory cows between Days 4 and 10. Our findings support a hypothesis that ovarian follicular development following administration of P(4) or ODB at the start of treatment with an IVP(4) device differs. Anovulatory oestrus may have been associated with reduced maturity and/or later emergence of ovarian follicles.     

Synchronization of ovulation in beef cows (Bos indicus) using GnRH, PGF2alpha and estradiol benzoate

The objective of this study was to evaluate protocols for synchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, Nelore cows (Bos indicus) at random stages of the estrous cycle were assigned to 1 of the following treatments: Group GP controls (nonlactating, n=7) received GnRH agonist (Day 0) and PGF2alpha (Day 7); while Groups GPG (nonlactating, n=8) and GPG-L (lactating, n=9) cows were given GnRH (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 7) and GnRH again (Day 8, 30 h after PGF2alpha). A new follicular wave was observed 1.79+/-0.34 d after GnRH in 19/24 cows. After PGF2alpha, ovulation occurred in 19/24 cows (6/7 GP, 6/8 GPG, 7/9 GPG-L). Most cows (83.3%) exhibited a dominant follicle just before PGF2alpha, and 17/19 ovulatory follicles were from a new follicular wave. There was a more precise synchrony of ovulation (within 12 h) in cows that received a second dose of GnRH (GPG and GPG-L) than controls (GP, ovulation within 48 h; P<0.01). In Experiment 2, lactating Nelore cows with a visible corpus luteum (CL) by ultrasonography were allocated to 2 treatments: Group GPE (n=10) received GnRH agonist (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 7) and estradiol benzoate (EB; Day 8, 24 h after PGF2alpha); while Group EPE (n=11), received EB (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 9) and EB (Day 10, 24 h after PGF2alpha). Emergence of a new follicular wave was observed 1.6+/-0.31 d after GnRH (Group GPE). After EB injection (Day 8) ovulation was observed at 45.38+/-2.03 h in 7/10 cows within 12 h. In Group EPE the emergence of a new follicular wave was observed later (4.36+/-0.31 d) than in Group GEP (1.6+/-0.31 d; P<0.001). After the second EB injection (Day 10) ovulation was observed at 44.16+/-2.21 h within 12 (7/11 cows) or 18 h (8/11 cows). All 3 treatments were effective in synchronizing ovulation in beef cows. However, GPE and, particularly, EPE treatments offer a promising alternative to the GPG protocol in timed artificial insemination of beef cattle, due to the low cost of EB compared with GnRH agonists.     

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicle dynamics and superovulatory response in progestin-treated cattle

Three experiments evaluated the effects of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular and CL dynamics, intervals to estrus and ovulation, and superovulatory response in cattle. Experiment 1 compared the efficacy of two norgestomet ear implants (Crestar and Syncro-Mate B; SMB) for 9 d (with PGF at implant removal), combined with either 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (EP) or 5 mg EV and 3mg norgestomet (EN) im at the time of implant insertion on CL diameter and follicular wave dynamics. Ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography. There was no effect of norgestomet implant. Diameter of the CL decreased following EN treatment (P < 0.01). Mean (+/- S.D.) day of follicular wave emergence (FWE) was earlier (P < 0.0001) and less variable (P < 0.0001) in EP- (3.6 +/- 0.5 d) than in EN- (5.7 +/- 1.5 d) treated heifers. Intervals from implant removal to estrus (P < 0.001) and ovulation (P < 0.01) were shorter in EN- (45.7 +/- 11.7 and 74.3 +/- 12.6 h, respectively) than in EP- (56.4 +/- 14.1 and 83.3 +/- 17.0 h, respectively) treated heifers. Experiment 2 compared the efficacy of EP versus EN in synchronizing FWE for superovulation in SMB-implanted cows. At random stages of the estrous cycle, Holstein cows (n = 78) received two SMB implants (Day 0) and were randomly assigned to receive EN on Day 0 or EP on Day 1. Folltropin-V treatments were initiated on the evening of Day 5, with PGF in the morning and evening of Day 8, when SMB were removed. Cows were inseminated after the onset of estrus and embryos were recovered 7 d later. Non-lactating cows had more CL (16.7 +/- 11.3 versus 8.3 +/- 4.9) and total ova/embryos (14.7 +/- 9.5 versus 7.9 +/- 4.6) than lactating cows (P < 0.05). EP-treated cows tended (P = 0.09) to yield more transferable embryos (5.6 +/- 5.2) than EN-treated cows (4.0 +/- 3.7). Experiment 3 compared the effect of dose of EV on ovarian follicle and CL growth profiles and synchrony of estrus and ovulation in CIDR-treated beef cows (n = 43). At random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0), cows received a CIDR and no further treatment (Control), or an injection of 1, 2, or 5 mg im of EV. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received PGF. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 Control cows and 31/32 EV-treated cows (P < 0.05). In responding cows, interval from treatment to FWE was longer (P < 0.05) in those treated with 5 mg EV (4.8 +/- 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1 mg (3.2 +/- 0.9 d) or 2 mg (3.4 +/- 0.8 d) EV, while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 +/- 2.0 d). Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.05) at CIDR removal and tended (P = 0.08) to be smaller just prior to ovulation in the 5 mg EV group (8.5 +/- 2.2 and 13.2 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 +/- 4.6 and 15.5 +/- 2.9 mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7 +/- 2.5 and 15.1 +/- 2.2 mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7 +/- 1.5 and 14.3 +/- 1.7 mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group, and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, treatment with 5mg EV resulted in a longer and more variable interval to follicular wave emergence than treatment with 5mg estradiol-17beta, which affected preovulatory dominant follicle size following progestin removal, and may have also affected superstimulatory response in Holstein cows. Additionally, 5 mg EV appeared to induce luteolysis in heifers, reducing the interval to ovulation following norgestomet removal. Conversely, intervals to, and synchrony of, follicular wave emergence, estrus and ovulation following treatment with 1 or 2 mg EV suggested that reduced doses of EV may be more useful for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence in progestogen-treated cattle.