Selection at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster: Effects of ethanol and temperature

Drosophila melanogaster larvae were subjected to 10 generations of selection on 6% ethanol at 17, 25, and 30°C. For each temperature there was a significant (P<0.01) increase in the frequency of the Adh isoallele. Controls with no ethanol showed no change in the frequency of the Adh ^F isoallele. Larvae subjected to stronger selection on 8% ethanol confirmed the results. When adults of various ages were subjected to 16 and 32°C, the ADH^F isoenzyme retained its twofold advantage in activity over ADH^S regardless of the temperature. The same result was obtained with larvae at 16 and 35°C. Although some effect of temperature was demonstrated, it was concluded that the effect was not strong enough for temperature to be a selective factor under the conditions studied. However, ethanol is a strong selective factor for laboratory populations.     

The effect of dietary ethanol on the composition of lipids of Drosophila melanogaster larvae

At a moderate concentration (2.5%, v/v) dietary ethanol reduced the chain length of total fatty acids (FA) and increased the desaturation of short-chain FA in Drosophila melanogaster larvae with a functional alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). The changes in length in total FA were postulated to be due to the modulation of the termination specificity of fatty acid synthetase. Because the ethanol-stimulated reduction in the length of unsaturated FA was blocked by linoleic acid, it was thought to reflect the properties of FA 9-desaturase. Although the ethanol-stimulated reduction in chain length of unsaturated FA was also observed in ADH-null larvae, ethanol promoted an increase in the length of total FA of the mutant larvae. Thus, the ethanolstimulated change in FA length was ADH dependent but the ethanol effect on FA desaturation was not. Ethanol also stimulated a decrease in the relative amount of phosphatidylcholine and an increase in phosphatidylethanolamine. Because similar ethanol-induced changes have been found in membrane lipids of other animals, ethanol may alter the properties of membranes in larvae. It is proposed that ethanol tolerance in D. melanogaster may be dependent on genes that specify lipids that are resistant to the detrimental effects of ethanol.This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM-28779 to B.W.G. and a Monash University Research Grant to S.W.M.     

Adh n5: A temperature-sensitive mutant at the Adh locus in Drosophila

Individuals of an alcohol dehydrogenase-negative strain of Drosophila melanogaster designated Adh ⁿ⁵ are resistant to ethanol poisoning at low but not at high temperatures. The basis for this behavior is that Adh ⁿ⁵ flies contain a mutant form of alcohol dehydrogenase which is less heat stable than that of wild-type flies. The mutation in Adh ⁿ⁵ maps at, or very close to, the presumptive structural locus and is not complemented by any of 11 other alcohol dehydrogenase-null mutants.This research was supported by Grant No. GM 18254 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant No. M55.2217 from the National Cancer Institute.Publication No. 768 from the Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University.     

Effect of environmental alcohol on in Vivo properties of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase

The effects of environmental 2-propanol on the in vivo properties of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (E.C. 1.1.1.1.) are presented. Exposed flies were found to exhibit a significant decrease in ADH specific activity with a concomitant increase in the enzyme's relative in vivo stability and concentration. The possible adaptive significance of the observed responses is discussed.This work was supported by NSF grant #DEB 7815466 to J.M. Journal Paper No. J-9979 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2272.     

Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase activity in vitro and in vivo: Effects of acetone feeding

When adult Drosophila are placed on medium containing 0.5% acetone, their level of alcohol dehydrogenase activity drops rapidly. At the same time, the proportion of activity in the various electrophoretic forms of the enzyme shifts; most of the activity becomes localized in what is ordinarily a minor form of the enzyme. Moreover, the loss of enzyme activity occurs in vivo as well, as shown by sensitivity to ethanol poisoning, insensitivity to pentenol treatment, and inability to utilize ethanol as an energy source. These observations are discussed in light of a model advanced for the origin of the multiple forms of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila.This research was supported by NIH Grants GM-18254 and ES-1527 and by DOE Contract No. EY-76-5-02-2965. Publication No. 1016 from the Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University.     

Effects on ADH activity and distribution,following selection for tolerance to ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster

Strains of Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for either the Adh ^F or the Adh ^S allele were kept on food supplemented with ethanol for 20 generations. These strains (FE and SE) were tested for tolerance to ethanol and compared with control strains (FN and SN). The E strains showed increased tolerance to ethanol both in the adult and in the juvenile life stages. In adults the increase in tolerance was not accompanied by an increase in overall ADH activity. However, there were changes in the distribution of ADH over the body parts. Flies of the FE strain possessed significantly more ADH in the abdomen, compared with FN. Another set of FN and SN populations were started both on standard food and on ethanol food with reduced yeast concentrations. After 9 months ADH activities were determined in flies from these populations which had been placed on three different media: the food the populations had been kept on, regular food and regular food supplemented with ethanol. The phenotypic effects of yeast reduction on ADH activity were considerably, but longterm genetic effects were limited.     

Metabolic adaptation to flooding stress in upland and lowland rice seedlings

Ability of metabolic adaptation in upland and lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings to flooding stress was compared. Flooding stress increased alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity and ethanol concentration in shoots and roots of the upland and lowland rice seedlings. The difference in ADH activity and ethanol concentration in shoots between the upland and lowland rice was not apparent. However, both ADH activity and ethanol concentration in roots of the lowland rice were 2-fold greater than those in roots of the upland rice, suggesting that flooding-induction of ethanolic fermentation in lowland rice roots may be significantly greater than that in the upland rice roots. Since flooding often causes the anaerobic conditions in rooting zone than aerial part of plants and ethanolic fermentation is essential to survive in the anaerobic conditions, the ability of metabolic adaptation in lowland rice seedlings to flooding stress may be greater than that in upland rice seedlings.     

Alcohol-oxidizing enzymes in 13 Drosophila species

Starch and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were used to ascertain the substrate specificities of alcohol-oxidizing enzymes in 13 Drosophila species. The substrates used were a variety of long- and short-chain aliphatic alcohols, one aromatic alcohol, and benzaldehyde. Only one enzyme (product of a single-gene locus) showed significant NAD⁺-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase activity with short-chain aliphatic alcohols. The 13 species, belonging to four different Drosophila groups, all showed a similar complement of alcohol-oxidizing enzymes, although differences in electrophoretic mobility and in levels of activity existed from species to species. These findings are relevant to the adaptation of Drosophila to alcohol environments.This study was supported by NIH Grant 1 PO1 GM 22221 and by Contract PA 200-14 Mod #4 with ERDA.     

Genetic control of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in Drosophila

Among the progeny of Drosophila flies heterozygous for two noncomplementing Adh-negative alleles, two individuals were found that had recovered appreciable alcohol dehydrogenase activity, thereby surviving the ethanol medium used as a screen. The most likely explanation is that these Adh-positive flies are the product of intracistronic recombination within the Adh locus. Judging by the distribution of outside markers, one of the crossovers would have been a conventional reciprocal exchange while the other appears to have been an instance of nonreciprocal recombination. The enzymes produced in strains derived from the original survivors can be easily distinguished from wild-type enzymes ADH-S and ADH-F on the basis of their sensitivity to denaturing agents. None of various physical and catalytic properties tested revealed differences between the enzymes of the survivor strains except that in one of them the level of activity is 55–65% of the other. Quantitative immunological determinations of ADH gave estimates of enzyme protein which are proportional to the measured activity levels. These results are interpreted to indicate that different amounts of ADH protein are being accumulated in the two strains.This work was supported in part by NSF Grant PCM 76-19563.     

Variation in the biochemical properties of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase allozymes

Thirteen Drosophila Adh variants have been characterized with respect to gene expression, substrate preference, thermostability, and specific activity. The results suggest that the variants may be grouped into two biochemical classes, typified by the properties of the two most common enzyme forms, ADH-F and ADH-S. Membership of these classes cannot be predicted from electrophoretic mobility, nor is any simple classification possible with regard to the characteristics of level of gene expression (in terms of ADH activity or ADH protein) or thermostability of the gene product.     

A method for determining the in vivo stability of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (E.C.1.1.1.1.)

A rapid and accurate method of measuring the relative in vivo stability of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase is presented. The potential of this technique for examining posttranslational control of in vivo enzyme concentrations is discussed.This work was supported by NSF grant #DEB 7815466 to J.M.Journal Paper No. J-9977 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2272.     

Ethanol tolerances of Drosophila melanogaster populations selected on different concentrations of ethanol supplemented media

Summary Eight recently collected Australasian populations of D. melanogaster were each divided into eight selection lines. Two of these lines from each population were maintained on one of four types of selection media: standard food supplemented with 0%, 3%, 6% and 9% ethanol. After 30 generations the selection lines were tested for tolerance to 9% ethanol medium and after another 20 generations adults were tested for tolerance to concentrated ethanol fumes. Significant differences in tolerance were found among lines selected on different media which were consistent across the eight populations. On the 9% test media, the 6% and 9% selection lines, as compared with the control lines selected on 0% ethanol, were more likely to survive as pre-adults or adults, faster to develop as preadults, and heavier and more productive as adults. However, the tolerance of the 3% lines to the 9% test media was less than that of the 0% control lines in preadult and adult survival, intermediate between that of the 0% and the 6% and 9% lines in productivities, and apparently superior to the 6% and 9% lines in development times and adult weights. The 3%, 6% and 9% lines showed similar tolerances to the ethanol vapour. Previous work showed that 3% ethanol can be a metabolic benefit to D. melanogaster but 6% and 9% are metabolic costs. The present results suggest that the phenotype selected on 3% to obtain a metabolic benefit differs in many respects from that selected on 6% and 9% to minimise their detrimental effects.     

Perturbation of gene frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for selection at the Adh locus

The cellar population of Drosophila melanogaster at the Chateau Tahbilk Winery (Victoria, Australia) was perturbed for alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene frequencies. Phenol oxidase (Phox) frequencies were also perturbed and monitored as a control. Subsequent gene frequency changes, together with information on population structure, indicated that selection acted on the chromosome regions of both loci. Adh gene frequencies returned to preperturbation levels in a predictable manner. A model in which the relative fitness of Adh phenotypes was determined by temperature-dependent specific activities of enzymes of Adh genotypes adequately accounts for the rate of gene frequency change at this locus. Thus temperature behaves as a selective agent in modulating Adh gene frequencies in this cellar environment.     

Interactions between the regulatory regions of twoAdh alleles

A region (NS1) that acts like an enhancer is located approximately 300 bp upstream of the larval cap site in theAdh gene ofD. melanogaster. When this sequence is deleted (NS1), the gene fails to express ADH protein. Gene expression can be restored by placing a secondAdh gene with an intact enhancer elsewhere on the same plasmid. In these circumstances, both genes are expressed equally regardless of their orientation on the plasmid. In this report we further characterize the interactions that occur when a single enhancer activates expression from a proximal and distant promoter. We have made the following observations: (1) While the two genes are expressed equivalently, their expression relative to a plasmid carrying two intact genes is reduced by a factor of 2 to 6 depending on the orientation of the two genes. (2) The single enhancer drives expression of both genes on any given plasmid molecule. (3) The enhancer does not interact with theAdh gene from which the NS7 region (which spans the larval TATA box) is removed. (4) Expression of the NS1 gene can be restored by an intact gene when both are inserted together into theDrosophila genome via P element-mediated transformation. (5) Increasing the separation between the two genes on a plasmid by up to 15 kbp does not prevent the restoration of expression of the NS1 gene. We propose a model that explains how a single enhancer can stimulate equal expression from two genes.     

Evolutionary genetics of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene-enzyme system

Evolutionary genetics embodies a broad research area that ranges from the DNA level to studies of genetic aspects in populations. In all cases the purpose is to determine the impact of genetic variation on evolutionary change. The broad range of evolutionary genetics requires the involvement of a diverse group of researchers: molecular biologists, (population) geneticists, biochemists, physiologists, ecologists, ethologists and theorists, each of which has its own insights and interests. For example, biochemists are often not concerned with the physiological function of a protein (with respect to pH, substrates, temperature, etc.), while ecologists, in turn, are often not interested in the biochemical-physiological aspects underlying the traits they study. This review deals with several evolutionary aspects of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene-enzyme system, and includes my own personal viewpoints. I have tried to condense and integrate the current knowledge in this field as it has developed since the comprehensive review by van Delden (1982). Details on specific issues may be gained from Sofer and Martin (1987), Sullivan, Atkinson and Starmer (1990); Chambers (1988, 1991); Geer, Miller and Heinstra (1991); and Winberg and McKinley-McKee (1992).Dedicated to Professor Billy W. Geer, because of his contributions to knowledge of the biochemical genetics of Drosophila.     

Alcohol metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster: Uselessness of the most active aldehyde oxidase produced by the Aldox locus

Alcohol dehydrogenase is necessary for ethanol detoxification and metabolic utilization. It has been generally assumed that aldehyde oxidase (AO) produced by the Aldox locus (3–56.7) is necessary for a further transformation of acetaldehyde into acetate. We find that various mutant strains (ma-l or Aldox ⁿ) which do not produce an active enzyme show about the same tolerance to alcohol as do wild strains. This physiological paradox is probably to be explained by the discovery of another locus (not localized) which produced a small amount of AO in all tested strains. The adaptive significance of the genetically polymorphic Aldox locus is probably to be looked for in physiological pathways other than ethanol metabolism.     

Questions remaining in sulfolipid biosynthesis: a historical perspective

The plant sulfolipid sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol was discovered by A.A. Benson in the late 1950s. The increasing availability of radioisotope-containing biological substrates such as ³⁵S-sulfate provided the means to discover novel biological compounds and to sketch out their biosynthetic pathways. During this time the structure of sulfolipid with its 6-deoxy-6-sulfo-α-d-glucose (sulfoquinovose) headgroup was determined. Immediately, the origin of this unusual biological sulfonic acid mystified the scientific community and several proposals for its biosynthesis were developed and tested. Strong supportive evidence for the nucleotide pathway of sulfolipid biosynthesis became available with the discovery of the bacterial and plant genes encoding the enzymes of sulfolipid biosynthesis during the 1990s. This latter work was based on the foundations laid by A.A. Benson and confirmed one initial hypothesis on sulfolipid biosynthesis. An abbreviated summary of the turning points in defining the mechanism for sulfolipid biosynthesis and remaining issues in sulfolipid biochemistry are provided.     

Chemical selection of mutants that affect ADH activity in Drosophila. III. Effects of ethanol

A chemical selection scheme is presented for the isolation of rare Adh-positive Drosophila. It makes use of the fact that flies lacking detectable ADH activity die as adults or larvae on relatively low concentrations of ethanol in the medium. We have demonstrated that this procedure is a practical one by crossing two Adh-negative alleles, screening 1.5×10⁶ embryos, and isolating 14 Adh-positive survivors.Supported by Postdoctoral Fellowship GM-57 from the National Institutes of Health to C. V. and by Grant GM-18254 from the NIH.Contribution No. 841 from the Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University.     

Alcohol dehydrogenase activities and ethanol tolerance in Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae) fruit-fly species and their hybrids

The ADH (alcohol dehydrogenase) system is one of the earliest known models of molecular evolution, and is still the most studied in Drosophila. Herein, we studied this model in the genus Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae). Due to the remarkable advantages it presents, it is possible to cross species with different Adh genotypes and with different phenotype traits related to ethanol tolerance. The two species studied here each have a different number of Adh gene copies, whereby crosses generate polymorphisms in gene number and in composition of the genetic background. We measured certain traits related to ethanol metabolism and tolerance. ADH specific enzyme activity presented gene by environment interactions, and the larval protein content showed an additive pattern of inheritance, whilst ADH enzyme activity per larva presented a complex behavior that may be explained by epistatic effects. Regression models suggest that there are heritable factors acting on ethanol tolerance, which may be related to enzymatic activity of the ADHs and to larval mass, although a pronounced environmental effect on ethanol tolerance was also observed. By using these data, we speculated on the mechanisms of ethanol tolerance and its inheritance as well as of associated traits.