Probing electrostatic interactions and ligand binding in aspartyl-tRNA synthetase through site-directed mutagenesis and computer simulations

Faithful genetic code translation requires that each aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase recognise its cognate amino acid ligand specifically. Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) distinguishes between its negatively-charged Asp substrate and two competitors, neutral Asn and di-negative succinate, using a complex network of electrostatic interactions. Here, we used molecular dynamics simulations and site-directed mutagenesis experiments to probe these interactions further. We attempt to decrease the Asp/Asn binding free energy difference via single, double and triple mutations that reduce the net positive charge in the active site of Escherichia coli AspRS. Earlier, Glutamine 199 was changed to a negatively-charged glutamate, giving a computed reduction in Asp affinity in good agreement with experiment. Here, Lysine 198 was changed to a neutral leucine; then, Lys198 and Gln199 were mutated simultaneously. Both mutants are predicted to have reduced Asp binding and improved Asn binding, but the changes are insufficient to overcome the initial, high specificity of the native enzyme, which retains a preference for Asp. Probing the aminoacyl-adenylation reaction through pyrophosphate exchange experiments, we found no detectable activity for the mutant enzymes, indicating weaker Asp binding and/or poorer transition state stabilization. The simulations show that the mutations' effect is partly offset by proton uptake by a nearby histidine. Therefore, we performed additional simulations where the nearby Histidines 448 and 449 were mutated to neutral or negative residues: (Lys198Leu, His448Gln, His449Gln), and (Lys198Leu, His448Glu, His449Gln). This led to unexpected conformational changes and loss of active site preorganization, suggesting that the AspRS active site has a limited structural tolerance for electrostatic modifications. The data give insights into the complex electrostatic network in the AspRS active site and illustrate the difficulty in engineering charged-to-neutral changes of the preferred ligand.     

The nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from Helicobacter pylori: anticodon-binding domain mutations that impact tRNA specificity and heterologous toxicity

Divergent tRNA substrate recognition patterns distinguish the two distinct forms of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) that exist in different bacteria. In some cases, a canonical, discriminating AspRS (D-AspRS) specifically generates Asp-tRNA(Asp) and usually coexists with asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS). In other bacteria, particularly those that lack AsnRS, AspRS is nondiscriminating (ND-AspRS) and generates both Asp-tRNA(Asp) and the noncanonical, misacylated Asp-tRNA(Asn); this misacylated tRNA is subsequently repaired by the glutamine-dependent Asp-tRNA(Asn)/Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase (Asp/Glu-Adt). The molecular features that distinguish the closely related bacterial D-AspRS and ND-AspRS are not well-understood. Here, we report the first characterization of the ND-AspRS from the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori or Hp). This enzyme is toxic when heterologously overexpressed in Escherichia coli. This toxicity is rescued upon coexpression of the Hp Asp/Glu-Adt, indicating that Hp Asp/Glu-Adt can utilize E. coli Asp-tRNA(Asn) as a substrate. Finally, mutations in the anticodon-binding domain of Hp ND-AspRS reduce this enzyme's ability to misacylate tRNA(Asn), in a manner that correlates with the toxicity of the enzyme in E. coli.     

tRNA-balanced expression of a eukaryal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by an mRNA-mediated pathway

Aminoacylation of transfer RNAs is a key step during translation. It is catalysed by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and requires the specific recognition of their cognate substrates, one or several tRNAs, ATP and the amino acid. Whereas the control of certain aaRS genes is well known in prokaryotes, little is known about the regulation of eukaryotic aaRS genes. Here, it is shown that expression of AspRS is regulated in yeast by a feedback mechanism that necessitates the binding of AspRS to its messenger RNA. This regulation leads to a synchronized expression of AspRS and tRNA(Asp). The correlation between AspRS expression and mRNA(AspRS) and tRNA(Asp) concentrations, as well as the presence of AspRS in the nucleus, suggests an original regulation mechanism. It is proposed that the surplus of AspRS, not sequestered by tRNA(Asp), is imported into the nucleus where it binds to mRNA(AspRS) and thus inhibits its accumulation.     

Redesigning the stereospecificity of tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase

d ‐Amino acids are largely excluded from protein synthesis, yet they are of great interest in biotechnology. Unnatural amino acids have been introduced into proteins using engineered aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), and this strategy might be applicable to d ‐amino acids. Several aaRSs can aminoacylate their tRNA with a d ‐amino acid; of these, tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) has the weakest stereospecificity. We use computational protein design to suggest active site mutations in Escherichia coli TyrRS that could increase its d ‐Tyr binding further, relative to l ‐Tyr. The mutations selected all modify one or more sidechain charges in the Tyr binding pocket. We test their effect by probing the aminoacyl‐adenylation reaction through pyrophosphate exchange experiments. We also perform extensive alchemical free energy simulations to obtain l ‐Tyr/d ‐Tyr binding free energy differences. Agreement with experiment is good, validating the structural models and detailed thermodynamic predictions the simulations provide. The TyrRS stereospecificity proves hard to engineer through charge‐altering mutations in the first and second coordination shells of the Tyr ammonium group. Of six mutants tested, two are active towards d ‐Tyr; one of these has an inverted stereospecificity, with a large preference for d ‐Tyr. However, its activity is low. Evidently, the TyrRS stereospecificity is robust towards charge rearrangements near the ligand. Future design may have to consider more distant and/or electrically neutral target mutations, and possibly design for binding of the transition state, whose structure however can only be modeled. Proteins 2016; 84:240–253. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase residues interacting with tRNA(Asp) identity bases connectively contribute to tRNA(Asp) binding in the ground and transition-state complex and discriminate against non-cognate tRNAs.

Crystallographic studies of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Asp)complex from yeast identified on the enzyme a number of residues potentially able to interact with tRNA(Asp). Alanine replacement of these residues (thought to disrupt the interactions) was used in the present study to evaluate their importance in tRNA(Asp)recognition and acylation. The results showed that contacts with the acceptor A of tRNA(Asp)by amino acid residues interacting through their side-chain occur only in the acylation transition state, whereas those located near the G73 discriminator base occur also during initial binding of tRNA(Asp). Interactions with the anticodon bases provide the largest free energy contribution to stability of the enzyme-tRNA complex in its ground state. These contacts also favour catalysis, by acting connectively with each other and with those of G73, as shown by multiple mutant analysis. This implies structural communication transmitting the anticodon recognition signal to the distally located acylation site. This signal might be conveyed via tRNA(Asp)as suggested by the observed conformational change of this molecule upon interaction with AspRS. From binding free energy values corresponding to the different AspRS-tRNA(Asp)interaction domains, it might be concluded that upon complex formation, the anticodon interacts first. Finally, acylation efficiencies of AspRS mutants in the presence of pure tRNA(Asp)and non-fractionated tRNAs indicate that residues involved in the binding of identity bases also discriminate against non-cognate tRNAs.     

Thermus thermophilus contains an eubacterial and an archaebacterial aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Thermus thermophilus possesses two aspartyl-tRNA synthetases (AspRSs), AspRS1 and AspRS2, encoded by distinct genes. Alignment of the protein sequences with AspRSs of other origins reveals that AspRS1 possesses the structural features of eubacterial AspRSs, whereas AspRS2 is structurally related to the archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural dissimilarity between the two thermophilic AspRSs is correlated with functional divergences. AspRS1 aspartylates tRNA(Asp) whereas AspRS2 aspartylates tRNA(Asp), and tRNA(Asn) with similar efficiencies. Since Asp bound on tRNA(Asn) is converted into Asn by a tRNA-dependent aspartate amidotransferase, AspRS2 is involved in Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation. These properties relate functionally AspRS2 to archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural basis of the dual specificity of T. thermophilus tRNA(Asn) was investigated by comparing its sequence with those of tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) of strict specificity. It is shown that the thermophilic tRNA(Asn) contains the elements defining asparagine identity in Escherichia coli, part of which being also the major elements of aspartate identity, whereas minor elements of this identity are missing. The structural context that permits expression of aspartate and asparagine identities by tRNA(Asn) and how AspRS2 accommodates tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) will be discussed. This work establishes a distinct structure-function relationship of eubacterial and archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural and functional properties of the two thermophilic AspRSs will be discussed in the context of the modern and primitive pathways of tRNA aspartylation and asparaginylation and related to the phylogenetic connexion of T. thermophilus to eubacteria and archaebacteria.     

The free yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase differs from the tRNA(Asp)-complexed enzyme by structural changes in the catalytic site, hinge region, and anticodon-binding domain

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the specific charging of amino acid residues on tRNAs. Accurate recognition of a tRNA by its synthetase is achieved through sequence and structural signalling. It has been shown that tRNAs undergo large conformational changes upon binding to enzymes, but little is known about the conformational rearrangements in tRNA-bound synthetases. To address this issue the crystal structure of the dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast was solved in its free form and compared to that of the protein associated to the cognate tRNA(Asp). The use of an enzyme truncated in N terminus improved the crystal quality and allowed us to solve and refine the structure of free AspRS at 2.3 A resolution. For the first time, snapshots are available for the different macromolecular states belonging to the same tRNA aminoacylation system, comprising the free forms for tRNA and enzyme, and their complex. Overall, the synthetase is less affected by the association than the tRNA, although significant local changes occur. They concern a rotation of the anticodon binding domain and a movement in the hinge region which connects the anticodon binding and active-site domains in the AspRS subunit. The most dramatic differences are observed in two evolutionary conserved loops. Both are in the neighborhood of the catalytic site and are of importance for ligand binding. The combination of this structural analysis with mutagenesis and enzymology data points to a tRNA binding process that starts by a recognition event between the tRNA anticodon loop and the synthetase anticodon binding module.     

A domain in the N-terminal extension of class IIb eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is important for tRNA binding

Cytoplasmic aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a homodimer of 64 kDa subunits. Previous studies have emphasized the high sensitivity of the N-terminal region to proteolytic cleavage, leading to truncated species that have lost the first 20-70 residues but that retain enzymatic activity and dimeric structure. In this work, we demonstrate that the N-terminal extension in yeast AspRS participates in tRNA binding and we generalize this finding to eukaryotic class IIb aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. By gel retardation studies and footprinting experiments on yeast tRNA(Asp), we show that the extension, connected to the anticodon-binding module of the synthetase, contacts tRNA on the minor groove side of its anticodon stem. Sequence comparison of eukaryotic class IIb synthetases identifies a lysine-rich 11 residue sequence ((29)LSKKALKKLQK(39) in yeast AspRS with the consensus xSKxxLKKxxK in class IIb synthetases) that is important for this binding. Direct proof of the role of this sequence comes from a mutagenesis analysis and from binding studies using the isolated peptide.     

Molecular dynamics simulations show that bound Mg2+ contributes to amino acid and aminoacyl adenylate binding specificity in aspartyl-tRNA synthetase through long range electrostatic interactions

Molecular recognition between the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes and their cognate amino acid ligands is essential for the faithful translation of the genetic code. In aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS), the co-substrate ATP binds preferentially with three associated Mg2+ cations in an unusual, bent geometry. The Mg2+ cations play a structural role and are thought to also participate catalytically in the enzyme reaction. Co-binding of the ATP x Mg3(2+) complex was shown recently to increase the Asp/Asn binding free energy difference, indicating that amino acid discrimination is substrate-assisted. Here, we used molecular dynamics free energy simulations and continuum electrostatic calculations to resolve two related questions. First, we showed that if one of the Mg2+ cations is removed, the Asp/Asn binding specificity is strongly reduced. Second, we computed the relative stabilities of the three-cation complex and the 2-cation complexes. We found that the 3-cation complex is overwhelmingly favored at ordinary magnesium concentrations, so that the protein is protected against the 2-cation state. In the homologous LysRS, the 3-cation complex was also strongly favored, but the third cation did not affect Lys binding. In tRNA-bound AspRS, the single remaining Mg2+ cation strongly favored the Asp-adenylate substrate relative to Asn-adenylate. Thus, in addition to their structural and catalytic roles, the Mg2+ cations contribute to specificity in AspRS through long range electrostatic interactions with the Asp side chain in both the pre- and post-adenylation states.     

Single amino acid changes in AspRS reveal alternative routes for expanding its tRNA repertoire in vivo

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are enzymes that are highly specific for their tRNA substrates. Here, we describe the expansion of a class IIb aaRS-tRNA specificity by a genetic selection that involves the use of a modified tRNA displaying an amber anticodon and the argE(amber) and lacZ(amber) reporters. The study was performed on Escherichia coli aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and amber tRNA(Asp). Nine AspRS mutants able to charge the amber tRNA(Asp) and to suppress the reporter genes were selected from a randomly mutated library. All the mutants exhibited a new amber tRNA(Asp) specificity in addition to the initial native tRNA(Asp). Six mutations were found in the anticodon-binding site located in the N-terminal OB-fold. The strongest suppressor was a mutation of residue Glu-93 that contacts specifically the anticodon nucleotide 34 in the crystal structure. The other mutations in the OB-fold were found at close distance from the anticodon in the so-called loop L45 and strand S1. They concern residues that do not contact tRNA(Asp) in the native complex. In addition, this study shows that suppressors can carry mutations located far from the anticodon-binding site. One such mutation was found in the synthetase hinge-module where it increases the tRNA(Asp)-charging rate, and two other mutations were found in the prokaryotic-specific insertion domain and the catalytic core. These mutants seem to act by indirect effects on the tRNA acceptor stem binding and on the conformation of the active site of the enzyme. Altogether, these data suggest the existence of various ways for modifying the mechanism of tRNA discrimination.     

An intricate RNA structure with two tRNA-derived motifs directs complex formation between yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and its mRNA

Accurate translation of genetic information necessitates the tuned expression of a large group of genes. Amongst them, controlled expression of the enzymes catalyzing the aminoacylation of tRNAs, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, is essential to insure translational fidelity. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) is regulated in a process necessitating recognition of the 5' extremity of AspRS messenger RNA (mRNA(AspRS)) by its translation product and adaptation to the cellular tRNA(Asp) concentration. Here, we have established the folding of the approximately 300 nucleotides long 5' end of mRNA(AspRS) and identified the structural signals involved in the regulation process. We show that the regulatory region in mRNA(AspRS) folds in two independent and symmetrically structured domains spaced by two single-stranded connectors. Domain I displays a tRNA(Asp) anticodon-like stem-loop structure with mimics of the aspartate identity determinants, that is restricted in domain II to a short double-stranded helix. The overall mRNA structure, based on enzymatic and chemical probing, supports a three-dimensional model where each monomer of yeast AspRS binds one individual domain and recognizes the mRNA structure as it recognizes its cognate tRNA(Asp). Sequence comparison of yeast genomes shows that the features within the mRNA recognized by AspRS are conserved in different Saccharomyces species. In the recognition process, the N-terminal extension of each AspRS subunit plays a crucial role in anchoring the tRNA-like motifs of the mRNA on the synthetase.     

Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase requires a conserved proline in the anticodon-binding loop for tRNA(Asn) recognition in vivo

Most prokaryotes require Asp-tRNA(Asn) for the synthesis of Asn-tRNA(Asn). This misacylated tRNA species is synthesized by a non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) that acylates both tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) with aspartate. In contrast, a discriminating AspRS forms only Asp-tRNA(Asp). Here we show that a conserved proline (position 77) in the L1 loop of the non-discriminating Deinococcus radiodurans AspRS2 is required for tRNA(Asn) recognition in vivo. Escherichia coli trpA34 was transformed with DNA from a library of D. radiodurans aspS2 genes with a randomized codon 77 and then subjected to in vivo selection for Asp-tRNA(Asn) formation by growth in minimal medium. Only proline codons were found at position 77 in the aspS2 genes isolated from 21 of the resulting viable colonies. However, when the aspS temperature-sensitive E. coli strain CS89 was transformed with the same DNA library and then screened for Asp-tRNA(Asp) formation in vivo by growth at the non-permissive temperature, codons for seven other amino acids besides proline were identified at position 77 in the isolates examined. Thus, replacement of proline 77 by cysteine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, serine, or valine resulted in mutant D. radiodurans AspRS2 enzymes still capable of forming Asp-tRNA(Asp) but unable to recognize tRNA(Asn). This strongly suggests that proline 77 is responsible for the non-discriminatory tRNA recognition properties of this enzyme.     

Structural basis for the activity and substrate specificity of Erwinia chrysanthemi L-asparaginase

Bacterial L-asparaginases, enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of L-asparagine to aspartic acid, have been used for over 30 years as therapeutic agents in the treatment of acute childhood lymphoblastic leukemia. Other substrates of asparaginases include L-glutamine, D-asparagine, and succinic acid monoamide. In this report, we present high-resolution crystal structures of the complexes of Erwinia chrysanthemi L-asparaginase (ErA) with the products of such reactions that also can serve as substrates, namely L-glutamic acid (L-Glu), D-aspartic acid (D-Asp), and succinic acid (Suc). Comparison of the four independent active sites within each complex indicates unique and specific binding of the ligand molecules; the mode of binding is also similar between complexes. The lack of the alpha-NH3(+) group in Suc, compared to L-Asp, does not affect the binding mode. The side chain of L-Glu, larger than that of L-Asp, causes several structural distortions in the ErA active side. The active site flexible loop (residues 15-33) does not exhibit stable conformation, resulting in suboptimal orientation of the nucleophile, Thr15. Additionally, the delta-COO(-) plane of L-Glu is approximately perpendicular to the plane of gamma-COO(-) in L-Asp bound to the asparaginase active site. Binding of D-Asp to the ErA active site is very distinctive compared to the other ligands, suggesting that the low activity of ErA against D-Asp could be mainly attributed to the low k(cat) value. A comparison of the amino acid sequence and the crystal structure of ErA with those of other bacterial L-asparaginases shows that the presence of two active-site residues, Glu63(ErA) and Ser254(ErA), may correlate with significant glutaminase activity, while their substitution by Gln and Asn, respectively, may lead to minimal L-glutaminase activity.     

Two residues in the anticodon recognition domain of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa are individually implicated in the recognition of tRNAAsn

In many organisms, the formation of asparaginyl-tRNA is not done by direct aminoacylation of tRNA(Asn) but by specific tRNA-dependent transamidation of aspartyl-tRNA(Asn). This transamidation pathway involves a nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) that charges both tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) with aspartic acid. Recently, it has been shown for the first time in an organism (Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1) that the transamidation pathway is the only route of synthesis of Asn-tRNA(Asn) but does not participate in Gln-tRNA(Gln) formation. P. aeruginosa PAO1 has a nondiscriminating AspRS. We report here the identification of two residues in the anticodon recognition domain (H31 and G83) which are implicated in the recognition of tRNA(Asn). Sequence comparisons of putative discriminating and nondiscriminating AspRSs (based on the presence or absence of the AdT operon and of AsnRS) revealed that bacterial nondiscriminating AspRSs possess a histidine at position 31 and usually a glycine at position 83, whereas discriminating AspRSs possess a leucine at position 31 and a residue other than a glycine at position 83. Mutagenesis of these residues of P. aeruginosa AspRS from histidine to leucine and from glycine to lysine increased the specificity of tRNA(Asp) charging over that of tRNA(Asn) by 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold, respectively. Thus, we show these residues to be determinants of the relaxed specificity of this nondiscriminating AspRS. Using available crystallographic data, we found that the H31 residue could interact with the central bases of the anticodons of the tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn). Therefore, these two determinants of specificity of P. aeruginosa AspRS could be important for all bacterial AspRSs.     

Dipeptide synthesis catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from Bacillus stearothermophilus

A new approach to enzymatic peptide synthesis by using aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) as a catalyst has been investigated. Four ARSs (AspRS, HisRS, LeuRS and TyrRS) have been purified from a thermophilic bacterium, Bacillus stearothermophilus. By using TyrRS as a catalyst, tyrosine and leucinamide were shown to be condensed in the presence of ATP to give tyrosylleucinamide. In this manner, all of the ARSs investigated catalyzed the peptide synthesis reactions. TyrRS did not have strict specificity for the amino acid derivatives used as substrates and even D-amino acids were incorporated into peptides fairly easily in this enzymatic reaction. Preparative scale synthesis of L-Tyr-L-LeuNH2 was carried out and from this the scope and limitation of this new enzymatic reaction as a tool to the peptide synthesis has been described.     

Structural consequences of D-amino acids in collagen triple-helical peptides

The effects of racemization of aspartic acid on triple-helical formation have been studied using a "host-guest" peptide approach where selected guest Gly-Xaa-Yaa triplets were included within a common acetyl-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)3-Gly-Xaa-Yaa-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)4-Gly-Gly-amide frame-work. Four guest triplets, Gly-Asp-Hyp and Gly-Asp-Ala where Asp is either L-Asp or D-Asp were studied. Thermal stability data indicated that incorporation of D-Asp residues prevented triple-helix formation in phosphate buffered saline, although triple-helical structures were formed in a stabilizing solvent, 67% aqueous ethylene glycol. In this solvent the melting temperatures of D-Asp containing peptides were more than 30 degrees C lower than the corresponding peptides containing L-Asp. For Gly-Asp-Ala peptides, but not Gly-Asp-Hyp, peptides, melting profiles indicated that a mixture of the D- and L-Asp containing peptides were able to form heterotrimer triple-helical molecules. These studies illustrate the dramatic destabilizing effect of D-amino acids on the triple-helix stability, but indicate that they can be accommodated in this conformation.     

Modulation of an AMPA-like glutamate receptor (SqGluR) gating by L- and D-aspartic acids

Summary. L- and D-aspartic acids (L-Asp and D-Asp) are present in the majority of nervous systems. In phylogeny, significant levels have been reported in mollusc brains, particularly cephalopods. To examine the role of L- and D-Asp on a cephalopod receptor, we studied ligand gating of a squid glutamate receptor (SqGluR) expressed in HEK 239 (human embryonic kidney) cells. Under voltage clamp, application of L-glutamate (L-Glu; 1–30 mM), but not D-glutamate (D-Glu), or L- or D-Asp, evoked an inward current of 0.1 nA. L- or D-Asp (200 μM) applied with 20 mM L-Glu, slowed the time course of activation and inactivation of the L-Glu gated current (time constant increased from 1 s (L-Glu alone) to 3 s (D-Asp and L-Glu) and to 19 s (L-Asp and L-Glu)). Our results suggest that in molluscan systems, aspartic acid could act as a neuromodulator during glutamatergic transmission and could significantly alter synaptic integration by slowing glutamate receptor gating.     

Blood-Brain Barrier Produces Significant Efflux of L-Aspartic Acid but Not D-Aspartic Acid

The brain efflux index method has been used to clarify the mechanism of efflux transport of acidic amino acids such as L-aspartic acid (L-Asp), L-glutamic acid (L-Glu), and D-aspartic acid (D-Asp) across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). About 85% of L-[3H]Asp and 40% of L-[3H]Glu was eliminated from the ipsilateral cerebrum within, respectively, 10 and 20 min of microinjection into the brain. The efflux rate constant of L-[3H]Asp and L-[3H]Glu was 0.207 and 0.0346 min(-1), respectively. However, D-[3H]Asp was not eliminated from brain over a 20-min period. The efflux of L-[3H]Asp and L-[3H]Glu was inhibited in the presence of excess unlabeled L-Asp and L-Glu, whereas D-Asp did not inhibit either form of efflux transport. Aspartic acid efflux across the BBB appears to be stereospecific. Using a combination of TLC and the bioimaging analysis, attempts were made to detect the metabolites of L-[3H]Asp and L-[3H]Glu in the ipsilateral cerebrum and jugular vein plasma following a microinjection into parietal cortex, area 2. Significant amounts of intact L-[3H]Asp and L-[3H]Glu were found in all samples examined, including jugular vein plasma, providing direct evidence that at least a part of the L-Asp and L-Glu in the brain interstitial fluid is transported across the BBB in the intact form. To compare the transport of acidic amino acids using brain parenchymal cells, brain slice uptake studies were performed. Although the slice-to-medium ratio of D-[3H]Asp was the highest, followed by L-[3H]Glu and L-[3H]Asp, the initial uptake rate did not differ for both L-[3H]Asp and D-[3H]Asp, suggesting that the uptake of aspartic acid in brain parenchymal cells is not stereospecific. These results provide evidence that the BBB may act as an efflux pump for L-Asp and L-Glu to reduce the brain interstitial fluid concentration and act as a static wall for D-Asp.     

Abundance and activity of Chloroflexi-type SAR202 bacterioplankton in the meso- and bathypelagic waters of the (sub)tropical Atlantic

The contribution of Chloroflexi-type SAR202 cells to total picoplankton and bacterial abundance and uptake of D- and L-aspartic acids (Asp) was determined in the different meso- and bathypelagic water masses of the (sub)tropical Atlantic (from 35 degrees N to 5 degrees S). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed that the overall abundance of SAR202 was < or = 1 x 10(3) cells ml(-1) in subsurface waters (100 m layer), increasing in the mesopelagic zone to 3 x 10(3) cells ml(-1) and remaining fairly constant down to 4000 m depth. Overall, the percentage of total picoplankton identified as SAR202 increased from < 1% in subsurface waters to 10-20% in the bathypelagic waters. On average, members of the SAR202 cluster accounted for about 30% of the Bacteria in the bathypelagic waters, whereas in the mesopelagic and subsurface waters, SAR202 cells contributed < 5% to total bacterial abundance. The ratio of D-Asp : L-Asp uptake by the bulk picoplankton community increased from the subsurface layer (D-Asp : L-Asp uptake ratio approximately 0.03) to the deeper layers reaching a ratio of approximately 1 at 4000 m depth. Combining FISH with microautoradiography to determine the proportion of SAR202 cells taking up D-Asp versus L-Asp, we found that approximately 30% of the SAR202 cells were taking up L-Asp throughout the water column while D-Asp was essentially not taken up by SAR202. This D-Asp : L-Asp uptake pattern of SAR202 cells is in contrast to that of the bulk bacterial and crenarchaeal community in the bathypelagic ocean, both sustaining a higher fraction of D-Asp-positive cells than L-Asp-positive cells. Thus, although the Chloroflexi-type SAR202 constitutes a major bathypelagic bacterial cluster, it does not contribute to the large fraction of d-Asp utilizing prokaryotic community in the meso- and bathypelagic waters of the North Atlantic, but rather utilizes preferentially L-amino acids.