Quantitative actin folding reactions using yeast CCT purified via an internal tag in the CCT3/gamma subunit

The eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin CCT is an essential ATP-dependent protein folding machine whose action is required for folding the cytoskeletal proteins actin and tubulin, and a small number of other substrates, including members of the WD40-propellor repeat-containing protein family. An efficient purification protocol for CCT from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been developed. It uses the calmodulin binding peptide as an affinity tag in an internal loop in the apical domain of the CCT3 subunit, which is predicted to be located on the outside of the double-ring assembly. This purified yeast CCT was used for a novel quantitative actin-folding assay with human beta-actin or yeast ACT1p protein folding intermediates, Ac(I), pre-synthesised in an Escherichia coli translation system. The formation of native actin follows approximately a first-order reaction with a rate constant of about 0.03 min(-1). Yeast CCT catalyses the folding of yeast ACT1p and human beta-actin with nearly identical rate constants and yields. The results from this controlled CCT-actin folding assay are consistent with a model where CCT and Ac(I) are in a binding pre-equilibrium with a rate-limiting binding step, followed by a faster ATP-driven processing to native actin. In this pure in vitro system, the human beta-actin mutants, D244S and G150P, show impaired folding behaviour in the manner predicted by our sequence-specific recognition model for CCT-actin interaction.     

Point mutations in a hinge linking the small and large domains of beta-actin result in trapped folding intermediates bound to cytosolic chaperonin CCT

The 30-A cryo-EM-derived structure of apo-CCT-alpha-actin shows actin opened up across its nucleotide-binding cleft and binding to either of two CCT subunit pairs, CCTbeta-CCTdelta or CCTepsilon-CCTdelta, in a similar 1:4 arrangement. The two main duplicated domains of native actin are linked twice, topologically, by the connecting residues, Q137-S145 and P333-S338, and are tightly held together by hydrogen bonding with bound adenine nucleotide. We carried out a mutational screen to find residues in actin that might be involved in the huge rotations observed in the CCT-bound folding intermediate. When two evolutionarily highly conserved glycine residues of beta-actin, G146 and G150, were changed to proline, both mutant actin proteins were poorly processed by CCT in in vitro translation assays; they become arrested on CCT. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the substrate-bound ring of the apo-CCT-beta-actin complex shows that beta-actin G150P is not able to bind across the chaperonin cavity to interact with the CCTdelta subunit. beta-actin G150P seems tightly packed and apparently bound only to the CCTbeta and CCTepsilon subunits, which further indicates that these CCT subunits drive the interaction between CCT and actin. Hinge opening seems to be critical for actin folding, and we suggest that residues G146 and G150 are important components of the hinge around which the rigid subdomains, presumably already present in early actin folding intermediates, rotate during CCT-assisted folding.     

Individual subunits of the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin mediate interactions with binding sites located on subdomains of beta-actin

The chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) of eukaryotic cytosol is composed of eight different subunit species that are proposed to have independent functions in folding its in vivo substrates, the actins and tubulins. CCT has been loaded with (35)S-beta-actin by in vitro translation in reticulocyte lysate and then subjected to immunoprecipitation with all eight anti-CCT subunit antibodies in mixed micelle buffers, conditions that disrupt CCT into its constituent monomers. Interactions between (35)S-beta-actin and isolated CCTalpha, CCTbeta, CCTepsilon, or CCTtheta subunits are observed, suggesting that polar and electrostatic interactions may mediate actin binding to these four CCT subunits. Additionally, a beta-actin peptide array was screened for CCT-binding sequences. Three regions rich in charged and polar amino acid residues, which map to the surface of native beta-actin, are implicated in interactions between actin and CCT. Several of these biochemical results are consistent with the recent cryo-electron microscopy three-dimensional structure of apo-CCT-alpha-actin, in which alpha-actin is bound by the apical domains of specific CCT subunits. A model is proposed in which actin interacts with several CCT subunits during its CCT-mediated folding cycle.     

Actin interacts with CCT via discrete binding sites: a binding transition-release model for CCT-mediated actin folding

The chaperones prefoldin and the cytosolic chaperonin CCT-containing TCP-1 (CCT) guide the cytoskeletal protein actin to its native conformation. Performing an alanine scan of actin, we identified discrete recognition determinants for CCT interaction. Interestingly, one of these is similar and functional in the non-homologous protein Cdc20, suggesting that some of the binding information in the CCT target proteins is shared. The information in actin for recognition by CCT and for folding is different, as all but one of the mutants in the recognition determinants are folding-competent. In addition, some other actin mutants remain CCT-arrested and are not released in a native conformation, whereas others do fold but remain bound to CAP. Kinetic experiments provide evidence that CCT-mediated folding of non-native actin occurs in at least two steps, in which initially the recognition determinant 245-249 contacts CCT and the other determinants interact at later stages. Actin mutants that are CCT-arrested demonstrate that some regions neighbouring the recognition determinants are involved in modulating the correct folding transitions of actin on CCT, or its release from this chaperonin. Further, we found that the ATP binding of actin is not a prerequisite for its release, and we suggest that CAP may be involved in charging the nucleotide. Based on the kinetics of CCT binding and folding of actin and actin mutants, we propose a multi-step recognition-transition-release model. This also implies that the currently accepted notion of CCT-mediated actin folding is probably more complex.     

Partial occlusion of both cavities of the eukaryotic chaperonin with antibody has no effect upon the rates of beta-actin or alpha-tubulin folding

The eukaryotic chaperonin containing T-complex polypeptide 1 (CCT) is required in vivo for the production of native actin and tubulin. It is a 900-kDa oligomer formed from two back-to-back rings, each containing eight different subunits surrounding a central cavity in which interactions with substrates are thought to occur. Here, we show that a monoclonal antibody recognizing the C terminus of the CCTalpha subunit can bind inside, and partially occlude, both cavities of apo-CCT. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate was programmed to synthesize beta-actin and alpha-tubulin in the presence and absence of anti-CCTalpha antibody. The binding of the antibody inside the cavity and its occupancy of a large part of it does not prevent the folding of beta-actin and alpha-tubulin by CCT, despite the fact that all the CCT in the in vitro translation reactions was continuously bound by two antibody molecules. Furthermore, no differences in the protease susceptibility of actin bound to CCT in the presence and absence of the monoclonal antibody were detected, indicating that the antibody molecules do not perturb the conformation of actin folding intermediates substantially. These data indicate that complete sequestration of substrate by CCT may not be required for productive folding, suggesting that there are differences in its folding mechanism compared with the Group I chaperonins.     

CCT chaperonins and their cochaperons

Chaperonins are large oligomers consisting of two superimposed rings, each enclosing a cavity used for the folding of other proteins. They have been divided into two groups. Chaperonins of type I were identified in mitochondria and chloroplasts (Hsp60) or bacterial cytosol (GroEL) as well. Chaperonins type II were found in Archea and the eukaryotic cell cytosol (CCT). Protein folding occurs in the chaperonin after its conformational changes induced upon ATP binding. Mechanism of the protein folding, although still poorly defined, clearly differs from the one established for GroEL. Although CCT with prefoldin seems to be mainly involved in the folding of actin and tubulin, other substrates engaged in various cellular processes are beginning to be characterized, including proteins possessing WD40-repeats. Moreover, several lines of evidence suggest that beside prefoldin, CCT may work in concert with phosducin-like proteins (PhLPs).     

The cytosolic class II chaperonin CCT recognizes delineated hydrophobic sequences in its target proteins

The nonhomologous proteins actin and alpha- and beta-tubulin need the assistance of the cytosolic chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) to reach their correct native state, and their folding requires a transient binary complex formation with CCT. We show that separate or combined deletion of three delineated hydrophobic sequences in actin disturbs the interaction with CCT. These sites are situated between residues 125-179, 244-285, and 340-375. Also, alpha- and beta-tubulin contain at least one recognition region, and intriguingly, it has a similar distribution of hydrophobic residues as region 244-285 in actin. Internal deletion of the sites in actin favor a model for cooperative binding of target proteins to CCT. Peptide mimetics, representing the binding regions, inhibit target polypeptide binding to CCT, suggesting that actin and tubulin contact similar CCT subunits. In addition, we show that actin recognition by class II chaperonins is different from that by class I.     

A single amino acid residue is responsible for species-specific incompatibility between CCT and α-actin

Actin is dependent on the type-II chaperonin CCT (chaperonin containing TCP-1) to reach its native state. In vitro, yeast CCT folds yeast and also mammalian cytoplasmic (β/γ) actins but is now found to be incapable of folding mammalian skeletal muscle α-actin. Arrest of α-actin on yeast CCT at a folding cycle intermediate has been observed by electron microscopy. This discovery explains previous observations in vivo that yeast mutants expressing only the muscle actin gene are non-viable. Mutational analysis identified a single specific α-actin residue, Asn-297, that confers this species/isoform folding specificity. The implications of this incompatibility for chaperonin mechanism and actin-CCT co-evolution are discussed.     

The group II chaperonin Mm-Cpn binds and refolds human γD crystallin

Chaperonins assist in the folding of nascent and misfolded proteins, though the mechanism of folding within the lumen of the chaperonin remains poorly understood. The archeal chaperonin from Methanococcus marapaludis, Mm-Cpn, shares the eightfold double barrel structure with other group II chaperonins, including the eukaryotic TRiC/CCT, required for actin and tubulin folding. However, Mm-Cpn is composed of a single species subunit, similar to group I chaperonin GroEL, rather than the eight subunit species needed for TRiC/CCT. Features of the β-sheet fold have been identified as sites of recognition by group II chaperonins. The crystallins, the major components of the vertebrate eye lens, are β-sheet proteins with two homologous Greek key domains. During refolding in vitro a partially folded intermediate is populated, and partitions between productive folding and off-pathway aggregation. We report here that in the presence of physiological concentrations of ATP, Mm-Cpn suppressed the aggregation of HγD-Crys by binding the partially folded intermediate. The complex was sufficiently stable to permit recovery by size exclusion chromatography. In the presence of ATP, Mm-Cpn promoted the refolding of the HγD-Crys intermediates to the native state. The ability of Mm-Cpn to bind and refold a human β-sheet protein suggests that Mm-Cpn may be useful as a simplified model for the substrate recognition mechanism of TRiC/CCT.     

Evidence that beta-tubulin induces a conformation change in the cytosolic chaperonin which stabilizes binding: implications for the mechanism of action

The class II chaperonin CCT facilitates protein folding by a process that is not well-understood. One striking feature of this chaperonin is its apparent selectivity in vivo, folding only actin, tubulin, and several other proteins. In contrast, the class I chaperonin GroEL is thought to facilitate the folding of many proteins within Escherichia coli. It has been proposed that this apparent selectivity is associated with certain regions of a substrate protein's primary structure. Using limiting amounts of beta-tubulin, beta-tubulin mutants, and beta-tubulin/ftsZ chimeras, we assessed the contribution of select regions of beta-tubulin to CCT binding. In a complementary study, we investigated inter-ring communication in CCT where we exploited polypeptide binding sensitivity to nucleotide to quantitate nucleotide binding. beta-Tubulin bound with a high apparent affinity to CCT in the absence of nucleotide (apparent K(D) approximately 3 nM; its apparent binding free energy, DeltaG, ca. -11.8 kcal/mol). Despite this, the interactions appear to be weak and distributed throughout much of the sequence, although certain sites ("hot spots") may interact somewhat more strongly with CCT. Globally averaged over the beta-tubulin sequence, these interactions appear to contribute ca. -9 to -11 cal/mol per residue, and to account for no more than 50-60% of the total binding free energy. We propose that a conformation change or deformation induced in CCT by substrate binding provides the missing free energy which stabilizes the binary complex. We suggest that by coupling CCT deformation with polypeptide binding, CCT avoids the need for high "intrinsic" affinities for its substrates. This strategy allows for dynamic interactions between chaperonin and bound substrate, which may facilitate folding on the interior surface of CCT in the absence of nucleotide and/or productive release of bound polypeptide into the central cavity upon subsequent MgATP binding. CCT displayed negative inter-ring cooperativity like GroEL. When ring 1 of CCT bound MgATP or beta-tubulin, the affinity of ring 2 for polypeptide or nucleotide was apparently reduced approximately 100-fold.     

A Two-step Mechanism for the Folding of Actin by the Yeast Cytosolic Chaperonin

Actin requires the chaperonin containing TCP1 (CCT), a hexadecameric ATPase essential for cell viability in eukaryotes, to fold to its native state. Following binding of unfolded actin to CCT, the cavity of the chaperone closes and actin is folded and released in an ATP-dependent folding cycle. In yeast, CCT forms a ternary complex with the phosducin-like protein PLP2p to fold actin, and together they can return nascent or chemically denatured actin to its native state in a pure in vitro folding assay. The complexity of the CCT-actin system makes the study of the actin folding mechanism technically challenging. We have established a novel spectroscopic assay through selectively labeling the C terminus of yeast actin with acrylodan and observe significant changes in the acrylodan fluorescence emission spectrum as actin is chemically unfolded and then refolded by the chaperonin. The variation in the polarity of the environment surrounding the fluorescent probe during the unfolding/folding processes has allowed us to monitor actin as it folds on CCT. The rate of actin folding at a range of temperatures and ATP concentrations has been determined for both wild type CCT and a mutant CCT, CCT4anc2, defective in folding actin in vivo. Binding of the non-hydrolysable ATP analog adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate to the ternary complex leads to 3-fold faster release of actin from CCT following addition of ATP, suggesting a two-step folding process with a conformational change occurring upon closure of the cavity and a subsequent final folding step involving packing of the C terminus to the native-like state.     

Analysis of the interaction between the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT and its substrates actin and tubulin

Two mechanisms have thus far been characterized for the assistance by chaperonins of the folding of other proteins. The first and best described is that of the prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL, which interacts with a large spectrum of proteins. GroEL uses a nonspecific mechanism by which any conformation of practically any unfolded polypeptide interacts with it through exposed, hydrophobic residues. ATP binding liberates the substrate in the GroEL cavity where it is given a chance to fold. A second mechanism has been described for the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT, which interacts mainly with the cytoskeletal proteins actin and tubulin. Cryoelectron microscopy and biochemical studies have revealed that both of these proteins interact with CCT in quasi-native, defined conformations. Here we have performed a detailed study of the docking of the actin and tubulin molecules extracted from their corresponding CCT:substrate complexes obtained from cryoelectron microscopy and image processing to localize certain regions in actin and tubulin that are involved in the interaction with CCT. These regions of actin and tubulin, which are not present in their prokaryotic counterparts FtsA and FtsZ, are involved in the polymerization of the two cytoskeletal proteins. These findings suggest coevolution of CCT with actin and tubulin in order to counteract the folding problems associated with the generation in these two cytoskeletal protein families of new domains involved in their polymerization.     

The Molecular Chaperone CCT Sequesters Gelsolin and Protects it from Cleavage by Caspase-3

The actin filament severing and capping protein gelsolin plays an important role in modulation of actin filament dynamics by influencing the number of actin filament ends. During apoptosis, gelsolin becomes constitutively active due to cleavage by caspase-3. In non-apoptotic cells gelsolin is activated by the binding of Ca²⁺. This activated form of gelsolin binds to, but is not a folding substrate of the molecular chaperone CCT/TRiC. Here we demonstrate that in vitro, gelsolin is protected from cleavage by caspase-3 in the presence of CCT. Cryoelectron microscopy and single particle 3D reconstruction of the CCT:gelsolin complex reveals that gelsolin is located in the interior of the chaperonin cavity, with a placement distinct from that of the obligate CCT folding substrates actin and tubulin. In cultured mouse melanoma B16F1 cells, gelsolin co-localises with CCT upon stimulation of actin dynamics at peripheral regions during lamellipodia formation. These data indicate that localised sequestration of gelsolin by CCT may provide spatial control of actin filament dynamics.     

Chaperonin-mediated folding of vertebrate actin-related protein and gamma-tubulin

The folding of actin and tubulin is mediated via interaction with a heteromeric toroidal complex (cytoplasmic chaperonin) that hydrolyzes ATP as part of the reaction whereby native proteins are ultimately released. Vertebrate actin-related protein (actin-RPV) (also termed centractin) and gamma-tubulin are two proteins that are distantly related to actin and tubulin, respectively: gamma-tubulin is exclusively located at the centrosome, while actin-RPV is conspicuously abundant at the same site. Here we show that actin-RPV and gamma- tubulin are both folded via interaction with the same chaperonin that mediates the folding of beta-actin and alpha- and beta-tubulin. In each case, the unfolded polypeptide forms a binary complex with cytoplasmic chaperonin and is released as a soluble, monomeric protein in the presence of Mg-ATP and the presence or absence of Mg-GTP. In contrast to alpha- and beta-tubulin, the folding of gamma-tubulin does not require the presence of cofactors in addition to chaperonin itself. Monomeric actin-RPV produced in in vitro folding reactions cocycles efficiently with native brain actin, while in vitro folded gamma- tubulin binds to polymerized microtubules in a manner consistent with interaction with microtubule ends. Both monomeric actin-RPV and gamma- tubulin bind to columns of immobilized nucleotide: monomeric actin-RPV has no marked preference for ATP or GTP, while gamma-tubulin shows some preference for GTP binding. We show that actin-RPV and gamma-tubulin compete with one another, and with beta-actin or alpha-tubulin, for binary complex formation with cytoplasmic chaperonin.     

Domain-specific chaperone-induced expansion is required for beta-actin folding: a comparison of beta-actin conformations upon interactions with GroEL and tail-less complex polypeptide 1 ring complex (TRiC)

Actin, an abundant cytosolic protein in eukaryotic cells, is dependent on the interaction with the chaperonin tail-less complex polypeptide 1 ring complex (TRiC) to fold to the native state. The prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL also binds non-native beta-actin, but is unable to guide beta-actin toward the native state. In this study we identify conformational rearrangements in beta-actin, by observing similarities and differences in the action of the two chaperonins. A cooperative collapse of beta-actin from the denatured state to an aggregation-prone intermediate is observed, and insoluble aggregates are formed in the absence of chaperonin. In the presence of GroEL, however, >90% of the aggregation-prone actin intermediate is kept in solution, which shows that the binding of non-native actin to GroEL is effective. The action of GroEL on bound flourescein-labeled beta-actin was characterized, and the structural rearrangement was compared to the case of the beta-actin-TRiC complex, employing the homo fluorescence resonance energy transfer methodology previously used [Villebeck, L., Persson, M., Luan, S.-L., Hammarstr?m, P., Lindgren, M., and Jonsson, B.-H. (2007) Biochemistry 46 (17), 5083-93]. The results suggest that the actin structure is rearranged by a "binding-induced expansion" mechanism in both TRiC and GroEL, but that binding to TRiC, in addition, causes a large and specific separation of two subdomains in the beta-actin molecule, leading to a distinct expansion of its ATP-binding cleft. Moreover, the binding of ATP and GroES has less effect on the GroEL-bound beta-actin molecule than the ATP binding to TRiC, where it leads to a major compaction of the beta-actin molecule. It can be concluded that the specific and directed rearrangement of the beta-actin structure, seen in the natural beta-actin-TRiC system, is vital for guiding beta-actin to the native state.     

The substrate recognition mechanisms in chaperonins

Chaperonins are a family of proteins devoted to assisting the folding of other proteins. They are large oligomers assembled into ring structures that enclose a cavity in which folding takes place. For this process to occur, the chaperonin must first recognize and interact with the unfolded polypeptide, then undergo a conformational change upon nucleotide binding that results in the closure of the cavity which in turn mediates the folding reaction inside the cavity. Although this general mechanism seems to apply to every chaperonin studied so far, there exist two different modes of interaction between the chaperonin and the substrate. The first occurs mainly through the interaction between the exposed hydrophobic residues of the unfolded polypeptides and those of the chaperonin substrate binding site, as elucidated for the chaperonin GroEL from E. coli. The second type of mechanism has been described so far only for the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (Chaperonin Containing TCP-1) and here the interaction seems to be of a more specific nature, involving charged and polar residues in both the chaperonin and the substrate, which interacts with CCT in a structured, quasi-native conformation.     

Eukaryotic chaperonin CCT stabilizes actin and tubulin folding intermediates in open quasi-native conformations

Three-dimensional reconstruction from cryoelectron micrographs of the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin CCT complexed to tubulin shows that CCT interacts with tubulin (both the alpha and beta isoforms) using five specific CCT subunits. The CCT-tubulin interaction has a different geometry to the CCT-actin interaction, and a mixture of shared and unique CCT subunits is used in binding the two substrates. Docking of the atomic structures of both actin and tubulin to their CCT-bound conformation suggests a common mode of chaperonin-substrate interaction. CCT stabilizes quasi-native structures in both proteins that are open through their domain-connecting hinge regions, suggesting a novel mechanism and function of CCT in assisted protein folding.     

Prefoldin recognition motifs in the nonhomologous proteins of the actin and tubulin families

Nascent actin and tubulin molecules undergo a series of complex interactions with chaperones and are thereby guided to their native conformation. These cytoskeletal proteins have the initial part of the pathway in common: both interact with prefoldin and with the cytosolic chaperonin containing tailless complex polypeptide 1. Little is understood with regard to how these chaperones and, in particular, prefoldin recognize the non-native forms of these target proteins. Using mutagenesis, we provide evidence that beta-actin and alpha-tubulin each have two prefoldin interaction sites. The most amino-terminally located site of both proteins shows striking sequence similarity, although these proteins are nonhomologous. Very similar motifs are present in beta- and gamma-tubulin and in the newly identified prefoldin target protein actin-related protein 1. Actin-related proteins 2 and 3 have related motifs, but these have altered charge properties. The latter two proteins do not bind prefoldin, although we identify them here as target proteins for the cytosolic chaperonin. Actin fragments containing the two prefoldin interaction regions compete efficiently with actin for prefoldin binding. In addition, they also compete with tubulins, suggesting that these target proteins contact similar prefoldin subunits.     

PhLP3 modulates CCT-mediated actin and tubulin folding via ternary complexes with substrates

Many ATP-dependent molecular chaperones, including Hsp70, Hsp90, and the chaperonins GroEL/Hsp60, require cofactor proteins to regulate their ATPase activities and thus folding functions in vivo. One conspicuous exception has been the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT, for which no regulator of its ATPase activity, other than non-native substrate proteins, is known. We identify the evolutionarily conserved PhLP3 (phosducin-like protein 3) as a modulator of CCT function in vitro and in vivo. PhLP3 binds CCT, spanning the cylindrical chaperonin cavity and contacting at least two subunits. When present in a ternary complex with CCT and an actin or tubulin substrate, PhLP3 significantly diminishes the chaperonin ATPase activity, and accordingly, excess PhLP3 perturbs actin or tubulin folding in vitro. Most interestingly, however, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PhLP3 homologue is required for proper actin and tubulin function. This cellular role of PhLP3 is most apparent in a strain that also lacks prefoldin, a chaperone that facilitates CCT-mediated actin and tubulin folding. We propose that the antagonistic actions of PhLP3 and prefoldin serve to modulate CCT activity and play a key role in establishing a functional cytoskeleton in vivo.     

The crystal structure of yeast CCT reveals intrinsic asymmetry of eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins

The cytosolic chaperonin CCT is a 1‐MDa protein‐folding machine essential for eukaryotic life. The CCT interactome shows involvement in folding and assembly of a small range of proteins linked to essential cellular processes such as cytoskeleton assembly and cell‐cycle regulation. CCT has a classic chaperonin architecture, with two heterogeneous 8‐membered rings stacked back‐to‐back, enclosing a folding cavity. However, the mechanism by which CCT assists folding is distinct from other chaperonins, with no hydrophobic wall lining a potential Anfinsen cage, and a sequential rather than concerted ATP hydrolysis mechanism. We have solved the crystal structure of yeast CCT in complex with actin at 3.8 Å resolution, revealing the subunit organisation and the location of discrete patches of co‐evolving ‘signature residues’ that mediate specific interactions between CCT and its substrates. The intrinsic asymmetry is revealed by the structural individuality of the CCT subunits, which display unique configurations, substrate binding properties, ATP‐binding heterogeneity and subunit–subunit interactions. The location of the evolutionarily conserved N‐terminus of Cct5 on the outside of the barrel, confirmed by mutational studies, is unique to eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins.