Cytokine Activation by Antibody Fragments Targeted to Cytokine-Receptor Signaling Complexes

Exogenous cytokine therapy can induce systemic toxicity, which might be prevented by activating endogenously produced cytokines in local cell niches. Here we developed antibody-based activators of cytokine signaling (AcCS), which recognize cytokines only when they are bound to their cell surface receptors. AcCS were developed for type I interferons (IFNs), which induce cellular activities by binding to cell surface receptors IFNAR1 and IFNAR2. As a potential alternative to exogenous IFN therapy, AcCS were shown to potentiate the biological activities of natural IFNs by ∼100-fold. Biochemical and structural characterization demonstrates that the AcCS stabilize the IFN-IFNAR2 binary complex by recognizing an IFN-induced conformational change in IFNAR2. Using IFN mutants that disrupt IFNAR1 binding, AcCS were able to enhance IFN antiviral potency without activating antiproliferative responses. This suggests AcCS can be used to manipulate cytokine signaling for basic science and possibly for therapeutic applications.     

The EM structure of a type I interferon-receptor complex reveals a novel mechanism for cytokine signaling

Type I interferons (IFNs) have pleiotropic effects, including antiviral, antiproliferative, and immunomodulatory responses. All type I IFNs bind to a shared receptor consisting of the two transmembrane proteins ifnar1 and ifnar2. We used negative stain electron microscopy to calculate a three-dimensional reconstruction of the ternary complex formed by a triple mutant IFN α2 with the ectodomains of ifnar1 and ifnar2. We present a model of the complex obtained by placing atomic models of subunits into the density map of the complex. The complex of IFN α2 with its receptor (a class II cytokine receptor) shows structural similarities to the complexes formed by growth hormone and erythropoietin with their receptors (members of the class I cytokine receptor family). Despite different assembly mechanisms, class I and class II cytokine receptors thus appear to initiate signaling through similar arrangements of the receptors induced by the binding of their respective ligands.     

Structural linkage between ligand discrimination and receptor activation by type I interferons

Type I Interferons (IFNs) are important cytokines for innate immunity against viruses and cancer. Sixteen human type I IFN variants signal through the same cell-surface receptors, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, yet they can evoke markedly different physiological effects. The crystal structures of two human type I IFN ternary signaling complexes containing IFNα2 and IFNω reveal recognition modes and heterotrimeric architectures that are unique among the cytokine receptor superfamily but conserved between different type I IFNs. Receptor-ligand cross-reactivity is enabled by conserved receptor-ligand "anchor points" interspersed among ligand-specific interactions that "tune" the relative IFN-binding affinities, in an apparent extracellular "ligand proofreading" mechanism that modulates biological activity. Functional differences between IFNs are linked to their respective receptor recognition chemistries, in concert with a ligand-induced conformational change in IFNAR1, that collectively control signal initiation and complex stability, ultimately regulating differential STAT phosphorylation profiles, receptor internalization rates, and downstream gene expression patterns.     

Endocytosis and trafficking of BMP receptors: Regulatory mechanisms for fine-tuning the signaling response in different cellular contexts

Signaling by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors is regulated at multiple levels in order to ensure proper interpretation of BMP stimuli in different cellular settings. As with other signaling receptors, regulation of the amount of exposed and signaling-competent BMP receptors at the plasma-membrane is predicted to be a key mechanism in governing their signaling output. Currently, the endocytosis of BMP receptors is thought to resemble that of the structurally related transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptors, as BMP receptors are constitutively internalized (independently of ligand binding), with moderate kinetics, and mostly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Also similar to TGF-β receptors, BMP receptors are able to signal from the plasma membrane, while internalization to endosomes may have a signal modulating effect. When at the plasma membrane, BMP receptors localize to different membrane domains including cholesterol rich domains and caveolae, suggesting a complex interplay between membrane distribution and internalization. An additional layer of complexity stems from the putative regulatory influence on the signaling and trafficking of BMP receptors exerted by ligand traps and/or co-receptors. Furthermore, the trafficking and signaling of BMP receptors are subject to alterations in cellular context. For example, genetic diseases involving changes in the expression of auxiliary factors of endocytic pathways hamper retrograde BMP signals in neurons, and perturb the regulation of synapse formation. This review summarizes current understanding of the trafficking of BMP receptors and discusses the role of trafficking in regulation of BMP signals.     

The Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor stabilizes epidermal growth factor receptors at the cell surface

Ligand binding to cell surface receptors initiates both signal transduction and endocytosis. Although signaling may continue within the endocytic compartment, down-regulation is the major mechanism that controls the concentration of cell surface receptors, their ability to receive environmental signals, and the ultimate strength of biological signaling. Internalization, recycling, and trafficking of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) within the endosome compartment are each regulated to control the overall process of down-regulation. We have identified the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF) as an important molecular component that stabilizes epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) at the cell surface to restrict receptor down-regulation. The NH(2)-terminal PDZ domain (PDZ 1) of NHERF specifically binds to an internal peptide motif located within the COOH-terminal regulatory domain of EGFR. Expression of NHERF slows the rate of EGF-induced receptor degradation. A point mutation that abolishes the PDZ 1 recognition sequence of EGFR enhances the rate of ligand-induced endocytosis and down-regulation of EGFR. Similarly, expression of a dominant negative mutant of NHERF enhances EGF-induced receptor down-regulation. In contrast to beta-adrenergic receptors where NHERF enhances recycling of internalized receptors, NHERF stabilizes EGFR at the cell surface and slows the rate of endocytosis without affecting recycling. Although the mechanisms differ, for both RTKs and G protein-coupled receptors, the overall effect of NHERF is to enhance the fraction of receptors present at the cell surface.     

鱼类和哺乳类RLR介导的抗病毒免疫反应的泛素化修饰调控

RLR[retinoic acid-inducible gene Ⅰ(RIG-Ⅰ)-like Receptors]是一类表达在胞浆中的模式识别受体, 在识别细胞质中经病毒复制产生的病毒RNA后, 启动一系列信号级联反应, 以诱导机体Ⅰ型干扰素及干扰素诱导的抗病毒基因的表达, 最后达到清除机体病毒感染的目的。由于在病毒感染时机体干扰素反应必须迅速启动, 当病毒清除后干扰素反应又需要立即恢复到正常本底水平, 因此RLR激活的信号转导途径受到了严格的调控, 其中就包括由E3泛素连接酶参与的泛素化修饰调控和由去泛素化酶参与的去泛素化修饰调控。自2003年成功鉴定出鱼类干扰素基因以来, 鱼类也被发现具有保守的RLR信号转导途径诱导干扰素抗病毒免疫反应, 该信号途径同样受到泛素化修饰的调控。文章总结了近年来泛素化修饰在哺乳类和鱼类RLR介导的抗病毒免疫应答通路中的调节机制。     

Modulation of lipoprotein receptor functions by intracellular adaptor proteins

Members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene family are critically involved in a wide range of physiological processes including lipid and vitamin homeostasis, cellular migration, neurodevelopment, and synaptic plasticity, to name a few. Lipoprotein receptors exert these diverse biological functions by acting as cellular uptake receptors or by inducing intracellular signaling cascades. It was discovered that a short sequence in the intracellular region of all lipoprotein receptors, Asn-Pro-X-Tyr (NPXY) is important for mediating either endocytosis or signal transduction events, and that this motif serves as a binding site for phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain containing scaffold proteins. These molecular adaptors connect the transmembrane receptors with the endocytosis machinery and regulate cellular trafficking, or function as assembly sites for dynamic multi-protein signaling complexes. Whereas the LDL receptor represents the archetype of an endocytic lipoprotein receptor, the structurally closely related apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (apoER2) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor activate a kinase-dependent intracellular signaling cascade after binding to the neuronal signaling molecule Reelin. This review focuses on two related PTB domain containing adaptor proteins that mediate these divergent lipoprotein receptor responses, ARH (autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia protein) and Dab1 (disabled-1), and discusses the structural and molecular basis of this different behaviour.     

Regulation of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling by plasma membrane organization and endocytosis

The trafficking of G protein coupled‐receptors (GPCRs) is one of the most exciting areas in cell biology because of recent advances demonstrating that GPCR signaling is spatially encoded. GPCRs, acting in a diverse array of physiological systems, can have differential signaling consequences depending on their subcellular localization. At the plasma membrane, GPCR organization could fine‐tune the initial stages of receptor signaling by determining the magnitude of signaling and the type of effectors to which receptors can couple. This organization is mediated by the lipid composition of the plasma membrane, receptor‐receptor interactions, and receptor interactions with intracellular scaffolding proteins. GPCR organization is subsequently changed by ligand binding and the regulated endocytosis of these receptors. Activated GPCRs can modulate the dynamics of their own endocytosis through changing clathrin‐coated pit dynamics, and through the scaffolding adaptor protein β‐arrestin. This endocytic regulation has signaling consequences, predominantly through modulation of the MAPK cascade. This review explores what is known about receptor sorting at the plasma membrane, protein partners that control receptor endocytosis, and the ways in which receptor sorting at the plasma membrane regulates downstream trafficking and signaling.      

Emerging concepts of receptor endocytosis and concurrent intracellular signaling: Mechanisms of guanylyl cyclase/natriuretic peptide receptor-A activation and trafficking

Endocytosis is a prominent clathrin-mediated mechanism for concentrated uptake and internalization of ligand-receptor complexes, also known as cargo. Internalization of cargo is the fundamental mechanism for receptor-dependent regulation of cell membrane function, intracellular signal transduction, and neurotransmission, as well as other biological and physiological activities. However, the intrinsic mechanisms of receptor endocytosis and contemporaneous intracellular signaling are not well understood. We review emerging concepts of receptor endocytosis with concurrent intracellular signaling, using a typical example of guanylyl cyclase/natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPRA) internalization, subcellular trafficking, and simultaneous generation of second-messenger cGMP and signaling in intact cells. We highlight the role of short-signal motifs located in the carboxyl-terminal regions of membrane receptors during their internalization and subsequent receptor trafficking in organelles that are not traditionally studied in this context, including nuclei and mitochondria. This review sheds light on the importance of future investigations of receptor endocytosis and trafficking in live cells and intact animals in vivo in physiological context.     

Endocytosis and endosomes at the crossroads of regulating trafficking of axon outgrowth-modifying receptors

In neurons, many receptors must be localized correctly to axons or dendrites for proper function. During development, receptors for nerve growth and guidance are targeted to axons and localized to growth cones where receptor activation by ligands results in promotion or inhibition of axon growth. Signaling outcomes downstream of ligand binding are determined by the location, levels and residence times of receptors on the neuronal plasma membrane. Therefore, the mechanisms controlling the trafficking of these receptors are crucial to the proper wiring of circuits. Membrane proteins accumulate on the axonal surface by multiple routes, including polarized sorting in the trans Golgi network, sorting in endosomes and removal by endocytosis. Endosomes also play important roles in the signaling pathways for both growth-promoting and -inhibiting molecules: signaling endosomes derived from endocytosis are important for signaling from growth cones to cell bodies. Growth-promoting neurotrophins and growth-inhibiting Nogo-A can use EHD4/Pincher-dependent endocytosis at the growth cone for their respective retrograde signaling. In addition to retrograde transport of endosomes, anterograde transport to axons in endosomes also occurs for several receptors, including the axon outgrowth-promoting cell adhesion molecule L1/NgCAM and TrkA. L1/NgCAM also depends on EHD4/Pincher-dependent endocytosis for its axonal polarization. In this review, we will focus on receptors whose trafficking has been reported to be modulated by the EHD4/Pincher family of endosomal regulators, namely L1/NgCAM, Trk and Nogo-A. We will first summarize the pathways underlying the axonal transport of these proteins and then discuss the potential roles of EHD4/Pincher in mediating their endocytosis.     

A novel endocytic recycling signal distinguishes biological responses of Trk neurotrophin receptors

Endocytic trafficking of signaling receptors to alternate intracellular pathways has been shown to lead to diverse biological consequences. In this study, we report that two neurotrophin receptors (tropomyosin-related kinase TrkA and TrkB) traverse divergent endocytic pathways after binding to their respective ligands (nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor). We provide evidence that TrkA receptors in neurosecretory cells and neurons predominantly recycle back to the cell surface in a ligand-dependent manner. We have identified a specific sequence in the TrkA juxtamembrane region, which is distinct from that in TrkB receptors, and is both necessary and sufficient for rapid recycling of internalized receptors. Conversely, TrkB receptors are predominantly sorted to the degradative pathway. Transplantation of the TrkA recycling sequence into TrkB receptors reroutes the TrkB receptor to the recycling pathway. Finally, we link these divergent trafficking pathways to alternate biological responses. On prolonged neurotrophin treatment, TrkA receptors produce prolonged activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling as well as survival responses, compared with TrkB receptors. These results indicate that TrkA receptors, which predominantly recycle in signal-dependent manner, have unique biological properties dictated by its specific endocytic trafficking itinerary.     

Biophysics of endocytic vesicle formation: A focus on liquid–liquid phase separation

Endocytosis is a fine-tuned mechanism of cellular communication through which cells internalize molecules on the plasma membrane, such as receptors and their bound ligands. Through receptor clustering in endocytic pits, recruitment of active receptors to different endocytic routes and their trafficking towards different fates, endocytosis modulates cell signaling and ultimately leads to a variety of biological responses. Many studies have focused their attention on specialized endocytic mechanisms depending on the nature of the internalizing cargo and cellular context, distinct sets of coat proteins, endocytic adaptors and membrane lipids. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the principles underlying endocytic vesicle formation, integrating both biochemical and biophysical factors, with a particular focus on intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) creating weakly interconnected protein networks assembled through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and driving membrane bending especially in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME). We finally discuss how these properties impinge on receptor fate and signaling.     

Regulation of virus-triggered type I interferon signaling by cellular and viral proteins

Host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize invading viral pathogens and initiate a series of signaling cascades that lead to the expression of type I interferons (IFNs) and inflammatory cytokines. During the past decade, significant progresses have been made to characterize PRRs such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) and elucidate the molecular mechanisms of TLR- and RLR-mediated signaling. To avoid excessive and harmful immune effects caused by over-activation of these signaling pathways, host cells adopt a number of strategies to regulate them. In addition, invading viruses also employ a variety of mechanisms to inhibit the production of type I IFNs, thereby evading the supervision and clearance by the host. In this review, we briefly summarize the TLR- and RLR-mediated type I IFN signaling and then focus on the mechanisms by which host cellular and viral components regulate the expression of type I IFNs.     

VEGF signaling inside vascular endothelial cells and beyond

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) has long been recognized as the key regulator of vascular development and function in health and disease. VEGF is a secreted polypeptide that binds to transmembrane tyrosine kinase VEGF receptors on the plasma membrane, inducing their dimerization, activation and assembly of a membrane-proximal signaling complex. Recent studies have revealed that many key events of VEGFR signaling occur inside the endothelial cell and are regulated by endosomal receptor trafficking. Plasma membrane VEGFR interacting molecules, including vascular guidance receptors Neuropilins and Ephrins also regulate VEGFR endocytosis and trafficking. VEGF signaling is increasingly recognized for its roles outside of the vascular system, notably during neural development, and blood vessels regulate epithelial branching morphogenesis. We review here recent advances in our understanding of VEGF signaling and its biological roles.     

NFkappaB negatively regulates interferon-induced gene expression and anti-influenza activity

Interferons (IFNs) are antiviral cytokines that selectively regulate gene expression through several signaling pathways including nuclear factor kappaB(NFkappaB). To investigate the specific role of NFkappaB in IFN signaling, we performed gene expression profiling after IFN treatment of embryonic fibroblasts derived from normal mice or mice with targeted deletion of NFkappaB p50 and p65 genes. Interestingly, several antiviral and immunomodulatory genes were induced higher by IFN in NFkappaB knock-out cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that NFkappaB was basally bound to the promoters of these genes, while IFN treatment resulted in the recruitment of STAT1 and STAT2 to these promoters. However, in NFkappaB knock-out cells IFN induced STAT binding as well as the binding of the IFN regulatory factor-1 (IRF1) to the IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) promoters. IRF1 binding closely correlated with enhanced gene induction. Moreover, NFkappaB suppressed both antiviral and immunomodulatory actions of IFN against influenza virus. Our results identify a novel negative regulatory role of NFkappaB in IFN-induced gene expression and biological activities and suggest that modulating NFkappaB activity may provide a new avenue for enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of IFN.     

Mutational and structural analysis of the binding interface between type I interferons and their receptor Ifnar2.

Type I interferons (IFN) exert pleiotropic activities through binding to two cell surface receptors, ifnar1 and ifnar2. We are investigating the biophysical basis of IFN signaling by characterizing the complex of the extra-cellular domain of ifnar2 (ifnar2-EC) with IFNs on the level of purified recombinant proteins in vitro. Here, we present a detailed mutational study on the functional epitopes on both IFN and ifnar2. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were determined by label-free heterogeneous phase detection. On IFNalpha2, a relatively small functional epitope comprising ten amino acid residues was localized, which is nearly entirely formed by residues on the AB loop. Two hot-spot residues, L30 and R33, account for two-thirds of the total interaction energy. Comparing the anti-viral potency of the various mutants to the binding affinity towards ifnar2 revealed a proportional correlation between the two, suggesting a rate-limiting role of ifnar2 binding in IFN signaling. On ifnar2, residues T46, I47 and M48 were identified as hot-spots in the interaction with IFNalpha2. For another ten residues on ifnar2, significant contribution of interaction energy was determined. Based on these data, the functional epitope on ifnar2 was defined according to a homology model based on other members of the class II hCR family in good agreement with the complementary functional epitope on IFNalpha2. Although IFNalpha2 and IFNbeta bind competitively to the same functional epitope, mutational analysis revealed distinct centers of binding for these IFNs on ifnar2. This small shift of the binding site may result in different angular orientation, which can be critically coupled to cytoplasmic signaling.     

Involvement of the Gab2 scaffolding adapter in type I interferon signalling

Interferons (IFNs) are pleiotropic cytokines involved in the regulation of physiological and pathological processes. Upon interaction with their specific receptors, IFNs activate the Jak/STAT signalling pathway. Numerous studies suggest, however, that the classical Jak/STAT pathway cannot alone account for the wide range of IFN's biological effects. To better understand the role of alternative signalling pathways in the type I IFNs response, we analyzed novel tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins following IFN-alpha2 stimulation. We showed for the first time that the Grb2-associated binder 2 (Gab2) protein is differentially phosphorylated upon the IFN subtype employed and the cells stimulated. We demonstrated that IFNAR1 physically interacts with Gab2. Moreover, the cellular content of Gab2 varies as a function of IFN receptor chain expression levels, and in particular of the ratio of IFNAR1 to IFNAR2, suggesting that Gab2 and IFNAR2 compete for interaction with IFNAR1. Analysis of Gab2 deletion mutants indicates that IFNAR1 might interact with a Gab2 region containing p85-PI3'kinase binding sites. Our results shed new light on recent data involving both Gab2 and type I IFNs in osteoclastogenesis and oncogenesis.     

Identification of residues of the IFNAR1 chain of the type I human interferon receptor critical for ligand binding and biological activity

The antiviral and antiproliferative activities of human type I interferons (IFNs) are mediated by two transmembrane receptor subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2. To elucidate the role of IFNAR1 in IFN binding and the establishment of biological activity, specific residues of IFNAR1 were mutated. Residues (62)FSSLKLNVY(70) of the S5-S6 loop of the N-terminal subdomain of IFNAR1 and tryptophan-129 of the second subdomain of IFNAR1 were shown to be crucial for IFN-alpha binding and signaling and establishment of biological activity. Mutagenesis of peptide (278)LRV in the third subdomain shows that these residues are critical for IFN-alpha-induced biological activity but not for ligand binding. These data, together with the sequence homology of IFNAR1 with cytokine receptors of known structure and the recently resolved NMR structure of IFNAR2, led to the establishment of a three-dimensional model of the human IFN-alpha/IFNAR1/IFNAR2 complex. This model predicts that following binding of IFN to IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 the receptor complex assumes a "closed form", in which the N-terminal domain of IFNAR1 acts as a lid, resulting in the activation of intracellular kinases. Differences in the primary sequence of individual IFN-alpha subtypes and resulting differences in binding affinity, duration of ligand/receptor association, or both would explain differences in intracellular signal intensities and biological activity observed for individual IFN-alpha subtypes.