The influence of fixation on the morphology of mitotic chromosomes

It is well known that there is a strong influence of fixation, i.e., acetic methanol versus formaldehyde, on the chromosome morphology at stages of the first meiotic division. In this study the influence of both these types of fixation on the morphology of mitotic chromosomes was examined in human lymphocytes. After methanol-acetic acid (3:1) fixation, the chromosomes show the "classical" condensed shape in which it is not always possible to recognize the two sister chromatids. These chromosomes are accessible to the conventional G-, R-, and C-banding techniques. After formaldehyde fixation at a relatively high pH, the chromosomes are thinner and longer (two to six times) when compared with chromosomes following methanol-acetic acid fixation. They show a scaffold-like morphology, sometimes with a halo of thin material around it. In all cases the two sister chromatids could be recognized. This chromosome structure could be easily stained with silver, Giemsa, 4,6-diamino-2-phenyl-indole (DAPI), and fluorescein isocyanate isomere 1 (FITC). The results obtained following these stainings gave no indication to any specific chemical composition of a probable central scaffold. The scaffold-like structures were not accessible to G-, R-, or C-banding techniques. The only effect observed following these banding techniques was the disappearance of the halo of thin material around the central scaffold-like structure.     

Mouse satellite DNA, centromere structure, and sister chromatid pairing

The experiments described were directed toward understanding relationships between mouse satellite DNA, sister chromatid pairing, and centromere function. Electron microscopy of a large mouse L929 marker chromosome shows that each of its multiple constrictions is coincident with a site of sister chromatid contact and the presence of mouse satellite DNA. However, only one of these sites, the central one, possesses kinetochores. This observation suggests either that satellite DNA alone is not sufficient for kinetochore formation or that when one kinetochore forms, other potential sites are suppressed. In the second set of experiments, we show that highly extended chromosomes from Hoechst 33258-treated cells (Hilwig, I., and A. Gropp, 1973, Exp. Cell Res., 81:474-477) lack kinetochores. Kinetochores are not seen in Miller spreads of these chromosomes, and at least one kinetochore antigen is not associated with these chromosomes when they were subjected to immunofluorescent analysis using anti-kinetochore scleroderma serum. These data suggest that kinetochore formation at centromeric heterochromatin may require a higher order chromatin structure which is altered by Hoechst binding. Finally, when metaphase chromosomes are subjected to digestion by restriction enzymes that degrade the bulk of mouse satellite DNA, contact between sister chromatids appears to be disrupted. Electron microscopy of digested chromosomes shows that there is a significant loss of heterochromatin between the sister chromatids at paired sites. In addition, fluorescence microscopy using anti-kinetochore serum reveals a greater inter-kinetochore distance than in controls or chromosomes digested with enzymes that spare satellite. We conclude that the presence of mouse satellite DNA in these regions is necessary for maintenance of contact between the sister chromatids of mouse mitotic chromosomes.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> sister chromatids often show complete alignment or separation along a 1.2-Mb euchromatic region but no cohesion “hot spots”

Sister chromatid cohesion is a prerequisite for correct segregation and possibly other functions of replicated chromosomes. Except for yeast, no details are known about arrangement of cohesion sites along interphase chromosomes. Within nuclei of several higher plants, sister chromatids are frequently not aligned at various positions along chromosome arms. Therefore, we tested whether preferential alignment positions (“cohesion hot spots”) and constant extension of and distances between aligned sites occur in plants. Along a ~1.2-Mb contig from the bottom arm of chromosome 1, the sister chromatid positions of 13 individual BAC inserts were found to be aligned for ~67–77% of homologues in 4C Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei. The differences between the 13 BAC positions were not significant at the P < 0.01 level. This suggests variability of alignment positions between cells and indicates the absence of cohesion “hot spots”. Similar as for single BACs, FISH with the entire contig indicated complete alignment for ~69% and complete separation of sister chromatids for ~31% of homologues in 4C nuclei. Partial alignment or separation was barely detectable. When three BAC inserts from a 760-kb region were tested simultaneously, alignment or separation of only the central BAC occurred in 3.3% and 3.5% of replicated chromosomes, respectively. Thus, we assume that sister chromatids can be separated or aligned within a Mb range in differentiated cells. However, the minimum extension of aligned sites or distances between them may (in rare cases) fall below ~500 kb.     

The metaphase scaffold is helically folded: sister chromatids have predominantly opposite helical handedness

We have studied the three-dimensional folding of the scaffolding in histone H1-depleted chromosomes by immunofluorescence with an antibody specific for topoisomerase II. Two different types of decondensed chromosomes are observed. The majority of the chromosomes are expanded, and the central fluorescence signal is surrounded by a large halo of chromatin. A much smaller number of chromosomes are more compact in length; they contain a smaller halo of chromatin and their scaffolds are not extended but folded into a genuine, quite regular helical coil. This conclusion is based on a three-dimensional structural analysis by optical sectioning. The number of helical coils is related to chromosome length. Surprisingly, sister chromatids have predominantly opposite helical handedness; that is, they are related by mirror symmetry.     

Genes occupy a fixed and symmetrical position on sister chromatids

A high-resolution fluorescence methodology for nonisotopic in situ hybridization was applied to determine the positions occupied by several single-copy genes, DNA sequences, and integrated viral genomes on sister chromatids. The lateral and longitudinal mapping of the probes was performed on prometaphase and metaphase chromosomes. A fixed lateral position, exterior or median in relation to the longitudinal axis of the chromatids, was observed for a given probe, with a symmetrical position of the double fluorescent spots. This position appears to be independent of chromosome condensation stage from prometaphase to metaphase. These observations suggest an opposite helical-handedness conformation of DNA on both chromatids with a mirror symmetry. They support the model of chromosome packaging recently proposed by Boy de la Tour and Laemmli. Moreover, our results indicate that the last stages of chromosome condensation occur by packing down the coils without further coiling.     

STUDIES ON THE ISOLATION OF METAPHASE CHROMOSOMES

A method for the isolation of metaphase chromosomes from mouse L1210 leukemia cells has been developed. Cells, arrested at metaphase with colchicine, were exposed to hypotonic solution and the pH was then adjusted to 5.6 to stabilize the chromosomes. The metaphase figures were subsequently disrupted and the chromosomes isolated by a series of differential centrifugations in sucrose. The isolated chromosomes were well preserved, as judged by morphological criteria. The effect of various enzymes and chemical agents on the isolated chromosomes was studied. Chymotrypsin, trypsin, and deoxyribonuclease caused a marked disintegration of the chromosomes, whereas treatment with pepsin and ribonuclease induced no significant morphological alterations.     

Mechanisms of maternal aneuploidy: FISH analysis of oocytes and polar bodies in patients undergoing assisted conception

We have examined unfertilised oocytes and their first polar bodies (PBs) to determine the way in which the frequency of whole chromosome imbalance compares with that involving single chromatids and whether the precocious separation of chromatids prior to anaphase I affects all pairs of chromosomes. We have applied the technique of fluorescent in situ hybridisation in a three-stage method by using locus-specific probes for chromosomes 13 and 21 and alpha-satellite probes for chromosomes 1, 9, 16, 18 and X to determine the chromosome status of oocytes and their PBs. We obtained analysable results from 127 oocytes and 57 PBs from 72 patients of average age 33 years. Six oocytes and three PBs had extra signals but, of these, three were derived from a single patient, aged 26. Anomalies were seen in chromosomes 13, 16, 18, X and, notably, 21 but none were observed in chromosomes 1 and 9. Half of the anomalies involved additional chromatids rather than whole chromosomes. Since particular chromatids were found to be prematurely separated in the metaphase II oocyte, this may provide further evidence for an additional mechanism of maternal aneuploidy that operates at anaphase II. Detailed analyses of both oocytes and PBs have elucidated possible mechanisms leading to aneuploid gametes in this group of patients with fertility problems.     

Minichromosome analysis of chromosome pairing, disjunction, and sister chromatid cohesion in maize

With the advent of engineered minichromosome technology in plants, an understanding of the properties of small chromosomes is desirable. Twenty-two minichromosomes of related origin but varying in size are described that provide a unique resource to study such behavior. Fourteen minichromosomes from this set could pair with each other in meiotic prophase at frequencies between 25 and 100%, but for the smaller chromosomes, the sister chromatids precociously separated in anaphase I. The other eight minichromosomes did not pair with themselves, and the sister chromatids divided equationally at meiosis I. In plants containing one minichromosome, the sister chromatids also separated at meiosis I. In anaphase II, the minichromosomes progressed to one pole or the other. The maize (Zea mays) Shugoshin protein, which has been hypothesized to protect centromere cohesion in meiosis I, is still present at anaphase I on minichromosomes that divide equationally. Also, there were no differences in the level of phosphorylation of Ser-10 of histone H3, a correlate of cohesion, in the minichromosomes in which sister chromatids separated during anaphase I compared with the normal chromosomes. These analyses suggest that meiotic centromeric cohesion is compromised in minichromosomes depending on their size and cannot be maintained by the mechanisms used by normal-sized chromosomes.     

Configurational changes in chromatids from helical to banded structures

Induction of configurational changes in the helical chromatids of air dried chromosomes was used to explore the mechanism of G-banding. From the water-Giemsa stained metaphase spreads of Chinese hamster cells, chromosomes having clearly helical chromatids were selected and photographed. Then the chromosomes were decolorized, treated with trypsin, and restained with saline-Giemsa (1 x SSC). Such procedures were repeatedly carried out upon the same chromosomes. Subsequent examination of the chromosomes showed that configurational changes from a helical structure to a banded structure had occurred. Some chromosomes revealed a variety of transitional changes between these two configurations. During the repeated G-banding treatments, the distances between bands along the same chromatids changed each time. The results obtained seem to indicate that the G-banding results from locally induced compaction of chromosomal materials along the chromatids.     

Mitosis with undivided chromosomes

Summary Cases of cell division with single chromatids are discussed in connection with a study on mitosis with undivided chromosomes made on living material of the endosperm of Haemanthus katharinae. Such divisions are known from certain abnormal mitoses in the microspores of a few plant species, and also from the second meiotic division, in which it is possible in numerous materials to study the behaviour of daughter univalents, and, in a few cases, also daughter chromosomes derived from chromosomes that were paired during the first division.The various cases of mitosis with single chromatids show a great variation with respect to the degree of scattering of the chromosomes over the spindle at metaphase. In a few cases there is practically no tendency to form a metaphase plate. In other cases the tendency to form such a plate is more or less pronounced, but also in these cases it is difficult for the chromosomes to form this arrangement. Some of them remain scattered over the spindle. After the metaphase a kind of anaphase usually follows in which the single chromatids, without division, move to the poles, often with other chromosomes lagging in intermediate positions.An approach of chromosomes to the poles may be caused by two different mechanisms in mitoses of this kind and only in a few cases is the information sufficient to show that active centromere movements occur during these anaphases.In many aspects of their behaviour on the spindle, single chromatids are similar to ordinary univalents of the first meiotic division. For this reason the movement mechanics of the chromosomes of the first meiotic division is briefly reviewed.The interpretation is expressed that the structure of the centromere region of a single chromatid shows some similarity to that of a univalent of the first meiotic division and that this may be the reason for their similar behaviour. The chromatid centromere would have a structural multiplicity with respect to its kinetic elements, corresponding to its subdivision in half-chromatids and also to the presence of two or three consecutive chromomeres in its longitudinal direction. As these kinetic elements are arranged close to one another on one side of the narrow cylinder of the centromere constriction, it is difficult for them to orient, towards both poles simultaneously. A single chromatid having a centromere of this kind will show orientation instability and change its orientation between the two unipolar orientations and various more or less bipolar orientations. The movements following these different orientations would cause the scattering of these single chromatids over the spindle. The orientation of ordinary mitotic metaphase chromosomes, consisting of two such chromatids, could often be the consequence of a process of co-orientation similar to that in meiotic bivalents.The anaphase movement of undivided chromosomes, which by active centromere movements are shifted in the polar directions without a separation of daughter components, is discussed with reference to a similar behaviour observed by Dietz in multivalents in Ostracods. These multivalents are stabilized in the equator during metaphase, in spite of the fact that they have two or three centromeres directed towards one pole and a single one towards the other. During anaphase their chromosomes do not separate but the whole configurations are shifted towards that pole towards which the majority of the centromeres are directed (this is followed by another type of movement which does not concern us in this connection). Undivided chromosomes that are oriented with more of their kinetic material towards one of the poles and less towards the other should by the same mechanisms as moved the multivalents be shifted in the equatorial direction during metaphase and in the polar direction during anaphase. The mechanism of these events is obscure. A change in the interpretation given by Dietz is suggested.This paper is dedicated to Professor Franz Schrader on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.     

Inverted meiosis and its place in the evolution of sexual reproduction pathways

Inverted meiosis is observed in plants (Cyperaceae and Juncaceae) and insects (Coccoidea, Aphididae) with holocentric chromosomes, the centromeres of which occupy from 70 to 90% of the metaphase chromosome length. In the first meiotic division (meiosis I), chiasmata are formed and rodlike bivalents orient equationally, and in anaphase I, sister chromatids segregate to the poles; the diploid chromosome number is maintained. Non-sister chromatids of homologous chromosomes remain in contact during interkinesis and prophase II and segregate in anaphase II, forming haploid chromosome sets. The segregation of sister chromatids in meiosis I was demonstrated by example of three plant species that were heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements. In these species, sister chromatids, marked with rearrangement, segregated in anaphase I. Using fluorescent antibodies, it was demonstrated that meiotic recombination enzymes Spo11 and Rad5l, typical of canonical meiosis, functioned at the meiotic prophase I of pollen mother cells of Luzula elegance and Rhynchospora pubera. Moreover, antibodies to synaptonemal complexes proteins ASY1 and ZYP1 were visualized as filamentous structures, pointing to probable formation of synaptonemal complexes. In L. elegance, chiasmata are formed by means of chromatin threads containing satellite DNA. According to the hypothesis of the author of this review, equational division of sister chromatids at meiosis I in the organisms with inverted meiosis can be explained by the absence of specific meiotic proteins (shugoshins). These proteins are able to protect cohesins of holocentric centromeres from hydrolysis by separases at meiosis I, as occurs in the organisms with monocentric chromosomes and canonical meiosis. The basic type of inverted meiosis was described in Coccoidea and Aphididae males. In their females, the variants of parthenogenesis were also observed. Until now, the methods of molecular cytogenetics were not applied for the analysis of inverted meiosis in Coccoidea and Aphididae. Evolutionary, inverted meiosis is thought to have appeared secondarily as an adaptation of the molecular mechanisms of canonical meiosis to chromosome holocentrism.     

Micromanipulation of chromosomes reveals that cohesion release during cell division is gradual and does not require tension

In mitosis, cohesion appears to be present along the entire length of the chromosome, between centromeres and along chromosome arms. By metaphase, sister chromatids appear as two adjacent but visibly distinct rods. Sister chromatids separate from one another in anaphase by releasing all chromosome cohesion. This is different from meiosis I, in which pairs of sister chromatids separate from one another, moving to each spindle pole by releasing cohesion only between sister chromatid arms. Then, in anaphase II, sister chromatids separate by releasing centromere cohesion. Our objective was to find where cohesion is present or absent on chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis and when and how it is released. We determined cohesion directly by pulling on chromosomes with two micromanipulation needles. Thus, we could distinguish for the first time between apparent doubleness as seen in the microscope and physical separability. We found that apparent doubleness can be deceiving: Visibly distinct sister chromatids often cannot be separated. We also demonstrated that cohesion is released gradually in anaphase, with chromosomes looking as if they were unzipped or pulled apart. This implied that tension from spindle forces was required, but we showed directly that no tension was necessary to pull chromatids apart.     

DISTRIBUTION OF TRITIUM-LABELED DNA AMONG CHROMOSOMES DURING MEIOSIS : I. Spermatogenesis in the Grasshopper

Thymidine-H³ of high specific activity was used to study the distribution of labeled chromatids during meiotic divisions in spermatocytes of a species of grasshopper (Orthoptera). The distribution is regularly semiconservative as has been shown previously for mitosis, i.e., all chromatids are labeled after incorporation of thymidine-H³ into DNA at premeiotic interphase. If incorporation occurs at the interphase preceding this one, the chromosomes arrive at meiotic divisions with the equivalent of one chromatid of each homologue labeled. Chromatid exchanges occur at a frequency which is very nearly that predicted on the assumption that each chiasma represents an exchange between homologous chromatids. However, the exchanges are randomly distributed among chromosomes in a size group, whereas chiasmata are not. A quantitative analysis of the frequency and pattern of exchanges indicates that most of these result from breakage and reciprocal exchange between homologous chromatids. Sister chromatid exchanges are much less frequent and may be limited to premeiotic stages.     

Shugoshin promotes sister kinetochore biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Chromosome segregation must be executed accurately during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Sgo1 plays a key role in ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in at least two ways. During meiosis this protein regulates the removal of cohesins, the proteins that hold sister chromatids together, from chromosomes. During mitosis, Sgo1 is required for sensing the absence of tension caused by sister kinetochores not being attached to microtubules emanating from opposite poles. Here we describe a differential requirement for Sgo1 in the segregation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids. Sgo1 plays only a minor role in segregating homologous chromosomes at meiosis I. In contrast, Sgo1 is important to bias sister kinetochores toward biorientation. We suggest that Sgo1 acts at sister kinetochores to promote their biorientation.     

Mitotic Chromosome Structure: Reproducibility of Folding and Symmetry between Sister Chromatids

Mitotic chromosome structure and pathways of mitotic condensation remain unknown. The limited amount of structural data on mitotic chromosome structure makes it impossible to distinguish between several mutually conflicting models. Here we used a Chinese hamster ovary cell line with three different lac operator-tagged vector insertions distributed over an ∼1 μm chromosome arm region to determine positioning reproducibility, long-range correlation in large-scale chromatin folding, and sister chromatid symmetry in minimally perturbed, metaphase chromosomes. The three-dimensional positions of these lac operator-tagged spots, stained with lac repressor, were measured in isolated metaphase chromosomes relative to the central chromatid axes labeled with antibodies to topoisomerase II. Longitudinal, but not axial, positioning of spots was reproducible but showed intrinsic variability, up to ∼300 nm, between sister chromatids. Spot positions on the same chromatid were uncorrelated, and no correlation or symmetry between the positions of corresponding spots on sister chromatids was detectable, showing the absence of highly ordered, long-range chromatin folding over tens of mega-basepairs. Our observations are in agreement with the absence of any regular, reproducible helical, last level of chromosome folding, but remain consistent with any hierarchical folding model in which irregularity in folding exists at one or multiple levels.     

Chromosome banding studies in an Indian mullet: evidence of structural rearrangements from NOR locations

C-, G- and NOR bands have been studied in the female sex of Rhinomugil corsula. (Mugilidae, Pisces) by deploying the conventional methodologies with suitable modifications of minor nature. The diploid metaphase complements contained 48 acrocentric chromosomes. The localization of C-band heterochromatin was found to be mostly at or near the centromeric regions of the acrocentric chromosomes. The G-type bands were not so well defined, but some of the G-banded chromosomes also contained C-bands. Interestingly, silver-positive NORs were found at the telomeric ends of five acrocentric chromosomes, including one homologous pair having NORs in both chromatids, while one chromosome showed NORs in both of its chromatids and the other two had only one NOR localized at one of its chromatids. This would suggest that one homologue of the second pair of NOR-bearing chromosomes possibly underwent a chromatid exchange with a non-NOR bearing chromosome. This is quite a unique situation not reported earlier in any species of fish., though some other form of NOR-polymorphism/heteromorphism has rarely been reported. Therefore, further exploration in natural populations of this species to examine the other sex and to verify if there also exists other chromosomally polymorphic races (in respect of NOR-polymorphism) of this species, would be rewarding.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids was obtained by treating chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) with Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55 degrees C (HB pretreatment) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, II, or micrococcal nuclease. In this staining pattern the BrdU bifilarly substituted chromatids were darkly and the unifilarly substituted chromatids lightly stained. This staining pattern was obtained only by staining the HB-DNase I-treated chromosomes with Giemsa and methylene blue, not by several other dyes tested. Relatively more DNA labelling was removed from the non-BrdU-substituted than the BrdU-substituted chromosomes, when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were digested with DNase I. But the protein labelling was not removed appreciably in the same treatment. The differential DNase I sensitivity between the non-BrdU-substituted and BrdU-substituted chromosomes disappeared when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were incubated with proteinase K before The DNase I digestion. Moreover, no differential DNase I sensitivity was found between the HB-pretreated isolated DNA containing and not containing BrdU. We propose that during the HB pretreatment, more DNA-protein cross-linkings are induced in BrdU bifilarly substituted than the unifilarly substituted chromatids. This structure protects the chromosomal DNA against the DNase I digestion. Thus, a reverse differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids is obtained by the HB-DNase I treatment.     

Use of the concanavalin-peroxidase-DAB system for identification of human chromosomes]

The effect of concanavalin A on the prometaphase chromosomes was investigated, using a staining reaction based on the peroxydase-diaminobenzidin-H2O2 system. After incubation with concanavalina A, the chromosomes telomeres as well as the centromeres and satellites of the acrocentric chromosomes were strongly stained. Sometimes the chromatids appeared to be coiled. In other respect, it must be noted that peroxydase alone can stain the chromatids, which probably means that this compounds is able to unite with the chromosomes, without the aid of concanavalin A.     

Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation

The fluorescence of human lymphocyte chromosomes stained with sulfhydryl group-specific fluorochromes is markedly enhanced by a mild near-ultraviolet irradiation pretreatment, indicating breakage of protein disulfide bonds. When metaphase preparations of cells cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are irradiated and subsequently stained with the sulfhydryl group-specific fluorescent reagents used in this study, a differential fluorescence of sister chromatids is observed. After staining with the DNA-specific fluorochrome DAPI an opposite pattern of lateral differentiation appears. It can be concluded that the chromatid containing bifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA has a higher content of sulfhydryl groups than the chromatid containing unifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA. This implies a more pronounced effect of breakage of disulfide bonds in the chromatid with the higher degree of BrdU-substitution. BrdU-containing chromosomes pretreated with the mild near-ultraviolet irradiation procedure used by us, do not show any differentiation of sister chromatids after Feulgen staining. Using sulfhydryl group-specific reagents, differential fluorescence of sister chromatids could still be induced by irradiation with near-ultraviolet light after the complete removal of DNA from the chromosomes by incubation with DNase I. Thus, the protein effect of irradiation of BrdU-containing chromosomes takes place independently of what occurs to DNA.Our results indicate that subsequent to the primary alteration of chromatin structure caused by the incorporation of BrdU into DNA, breakage of disulfide bonds of chromosomal proteins might play an important role in bringing about differential staining of sister chromatids, at least for those procedures that use irradiation as a pretreatment or prolonged illumination during microscopic examination.