C5a receptor oligomerization. II. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of a human G protein-coupled receptor expressed in yeast

Recent studies demonstrate that members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form oligomers both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms by which GPCRs oligomerize and the roles of accessory proteins in this process are not well understood. We used disulfide-trapping experiments to show that C5a receptors, expressed in mammalian cells, reside in membranes as oligomers (Klco, J. M., Lassere, T. B., and Baranski, T. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35345-35353). To begin to address how C5a receptors form oligomers, we now use fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments on human C5a receptors expressed in the lower eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae. C5a receptors tagged with variants of the green fluorescent protein display energy transfer in intact yeast, demonstrating that mammalian accessory proteins are not required for C5a receptor oligomerization. In both intact yeast cells and membrane preparations, agonist does not affect FRET efficiency, and little energy transfer is observed between the C5a receptor and a co-expressed yeast pheromone receptor (encoded by STE2), indicating that C5a receptor oligomerization is both receptor-specific and constitutive. FRET studies performed on fractionated membranes demonstrate similar levels of energy transfer between tagged C5a receptors in endoplasmic reticulum compared with plasma membrane, and urea washing of membranes has little effect on the extent of energy transfer. The oligomerization of C5a receptors expressed in yeast displays characteristics similar to those observed for other GPCRs studied in mammalian cells. This model system should prove useful for further studies to define mechanisms of oligomerization of mammalian GPCRs.     

Essential role for the second extracellular loop in C5a receptor activation

More than 90% of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) contain a disulfide bridge that tethers the second extracellular loop (EC2) to the third transmembrane helix. To determine the importance of EC2 and its disulfide bridge in receptor activation, we subjected this region of the complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR) to random saturation mutagenesis and screened for functional receptors in yeast. The cysteine forming the disulfide bridge was the only conserved residue in the EC2-mutated receptors. Notably, approximately 80% of the functional receptors exhibited potent constitutive activity. These results demonstrate an unexpected role for EC2 as a negative regulator of C5a receptor activation. We propose that in other GPCRs, EC2 might serve a similar role by stabilizing the inactive state of the receptor.     

Use of a disulfide cross-linking strategy to study muscarinic receptor structure and mechanisms of activation.

To gain insight into the molecular architecture of the cytoplasmic surface of G protein-coupled receptors, we have developed a disulfide cross-linking strategy using the m3 muscarinic receptor as a model system. To facilitate the interpretation of disulfide cross-linking data, we initially generated a mutant m3 muscarinic receptor (referred to as m3'(3C)-Xa) in which most native Cys residues had been deleted or substituted with Ala or Ser (remaining Cys residues Cys-140, Cys-220, and Cys-532) and in which the central portion of the third intracellular loop had been replaced with a factor Xa cleavage site. Radioligand binding and second messenger assays showed that the m3'(3C)-Xa mutant receptor was fully functional. In the next step, pairs of Cys residues were reintroduced into the m3'(3C)-Xa construct, thus generating 10 double Cys mutant receptors. All 10 mutant receptors contained a Cys residue at position 169 at the beginning of the second intracellular loop and a second Cys within the C-terminal portion of the third intracellular loop, at positions 484-493. Radioligand binding studies and phosphatidylinositol assays indicated that all double Cys mutant receptors were properly folded. Membrane lysates prepared from COS-7 cells transfected with the different mutant receptor constructs were incubated with factor Xa protease and the oxidizing agent Cu(II)-(1,10-phenanthroline)3, and the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds between juxtaposed Cys residues was monitored by using a combined immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting strategy. To our surprise, efficient disulfide cross-linking was observed with 8 of the 10 double Cys mutant receptors studied (Cys-169/Cys-484 to Cys-491), suggesting that the intracellular m3 receptor surface is characterized by pronounced backbone fluctuations. Moreover, [35S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assays indicated that the formation of intramolecular disulfide cross-links prevented or strongly inhibited receptor-mediated G protein activation, suggesting that the highly dynamic character of the cytoplasmic receptor surface is a prerequisite for efficient receptor-G protein interactions. This is the first study using a disulfide mapping strategy to examine the three-dimensional structure of a hormone-activated G protein-coupled receptor.     

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.     

Ligand sensitivity in dimeric associations of the serotonin 5HT2c receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to external stimuli by activating heterotrimeric G proteins inside the cell. There is increasing evidence that many GPCRs exist as dimers or higher oligomers, but the biochemical nature of such dimers and what roles they have, if any, in signal transduction remains unclear. We conducted a comprehensive study of dimerization of the 5HT2c serotonin receptor using disulphide-trapping experiments. We found a dimer interface between transmembrane (TM) helices IV and V that is markedly sensitive to the state of receptor activation. This dimer seems to be quasisymmetrical in interfacial geometry and asymmetrical in its association with its cognate G alpha protein. We also found a second interface at TM I helices, which is insensitive to the state of activation.     

The extracellular N-terminal domain and transmembrane domains 1 and 2 mediate oligomerization of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form homodimers/oligomers and/or heterodimers/oligomers. The mechanisms used to form specific GPCR oligomers are poorly understood because the domains that mediate such interactions and the step(s) in the secretory pathway where oligomerization occurs have not been well characterized. Here we have used subcellular fractionation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments to show that oligomerization of a GPCR (alpha-factor receptor; STE2 gene product) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum. To identify domains of this receptor that mediate oligomerization, we used FRET and endocytosis assays of oligomerization in vivo to analyze receptor deletion mutants. A mutant lacking the N-terminal extracellular domain and transmembrane (TM) domain 1 was expressed at the cell surface but did not self-associate. In contrast, a receptor fragment containing only the N-terminal extracellular domain and TM1 could self-associate and heterodimerize with wild type receptors. Analysis of other mutants suggested that oligomerization is facilitated by the N-terminal extracellular domain and TM2. Therefore, the N-terminal extracellular domain, TM1, and TM2 appear to stabilize alpha-factor receptor oligomers. These domains may form an interface in contact or domain-swapped oligomers. Similar domains may mediate dimerization of certain mammalian GPCRs.     

Conformational changes that occur during M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation probed by the use of an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy.

The structural changes involved in ligand-dependent activation of G protein-coupled receptors are not well understood at present. To address this issue, we developed an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy using the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor, a prototypical G(q)-coupled receptor, as a model system. It is known that a tyrosine residue (Tyr(254)) located at the C terminus of transmembrane domain (TM) V and several primarily hydrophobic amino acids present within the cytoplasmic portion of TM VI play key roles in determining the G protein coupling selectivity of the M(3) receptor subtype. To examine whether M3 receptor activation involves changes in the relative orientations of these functionally critical residues, pairs of cysteine residues were substituted into a modified version of the M(3) receptor that contained a factor Xa cleavage site within the third intracellular loop and lacked most endogenous cysteine residues. All analyzed mutant receptors contained a Y254C point mutation and a second cysteine substitution within the segment Lys(484)-Ser(493) at the intracellular end of TM VI. Following their transient expression in COS-7 cells, mutant receptors present in their native membrane environment (in situ) were subjected to mild oxidizing conditions, either in the absence or in the presence of the muscarinic agonist, carbachol. The successful formation of disulfide cross-links was monitored by studying changes in the electrophoretic mobility of oxidized, factor Xa-treated receptors on SDS gels. The observed cross-linking patterns indicated that M(3) receptor activation leads to structural changes that allow the cytoplasmic ends of TM V and TM VI to move closer to each other and that also appear to involve a major change in secondary structure at the cytoplasmic end of TM VI. This is the first study employing an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy to examine agonist-dependent dynamic structural changes in a G protein-coupled receptor.     

Complement component 5a receptor oligomerization and homologous receptor down-regulation

Most G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form di(oligo)-meric structures that constitute signaling and trafficking units and might be essential for receptor functions. Cell responses to complement C5a receptor (C5aR) are tightly controlled by receptor desensitization and internalization. To examine the implication of dimerization in C5aR regulation, we generated an NH(2)-terminally modified C5aR mutant, unable to bind C5a, and a phosphorylation-deficient mutant. Neither an intact NH(2) terminus nor the presence of COOH-terminal phosphorylation sites appeared to be required for the formation of C5aR dimers. Upon C5a stimulation, mutant receptors did not internalize when individually expressed. C5a stimulation of cells that co-expressed wild type C5aR together with either unliganded or phosphorylation-deficient mutant resulted in co-internalization of mutant receptors with C5aR. Unliganded GPCRs can be cross-phosphorylated within a heterologous receptor dimer or by second messenger-activated kinases. C5a stimulation of (32)P-labeled cells that co-expressed the unliganded mutant with either C5aR or the phosphorylation-deficient mutant did not induce phosphorylation of the unliganded mutant. We can thus postulate that, in the case of C5aR, the stimulation and phosphorylation of one monomer is enough to lead to dimer internalization. The existence and functional implication of di(oligo)mer formation may be important for an accurate C5aR down-regulation in pathological conditions.     

Structure/function analysis of alpha2A-adrenergic receptor interaction with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the ability of a diverse array of extracellular stimuli to control intracellular signaling. Many GPCRs are phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), a process that mediates agonist-specific desensitization in many cells. Although GRK binding to activated GPCRs results in kinase activation and receptor phosphorylation, relatively little is known about the mechanism of GRK/GPCR interaction or how this interaction results in kinase activation. Here, we used the alpha2A-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)AR) as a model to study GRK/receptor interaction because GRK2 phosphorylation of four adjacent serines within the large third intracellular loop of this receptor is known to mediate desensitization. Various domains of the alpha(2A)AR were expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins and tested for the ability to bind purified GRK2. The second and third intracellular loops of the alpha(2A)AR directly interacted with GRK2, whereas the first intracellular loop and C-terminal domain did not. Truncation mutagenesis identified three discrete regions within the third loop that contributed to GRK2 binding, the membrane proximal N- and C-terminal regions as well as a central region adjacent to the phosphorylation sites. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed a critical role for specific basic residues within these regions in mediating GRK2 interaction with the alpha(2A)AR. Mutation of these residues within the holo-alpha(2A)AR diminished GRK2-promoted phosphorylation of the receptor as well as the ability of the kinase to be activated by receptor binding. These studies provide new insight into the mechanism of interaction and activation of GRK2 by GPCRs and suggest that GRK2 binding is critical not only for receptor phosphorylation but also for full activity of the kinase.     

Novel Structural and Functional Insights into M3 Muscarinic Receptor Dimer/Oligomer Formation

Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are able to form homodimers and/or oligomeric arrays. We recently proposed, based on bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies with the M₃ muscarinic receptor (M3R), a prototypic class A GPCR, that the M3R is able to form multiple, structurally distinct dimers that are probably transient in nature (McMillin, S. M., Heusel, M., Liu, T., Costanzi, S., and Wess, J. (2011) J. Biol. Chem. 286, 28584–28598). To provide more direct experimental support for this concept, we employed a disulfide cross-linking strategy to trap various M3R dimeric species present in a native lipid environment (transfected COS-7 cells). Disulfide cross-linking studies were carried out with many mutant M3Rs containing single cysteine (Cys) substitutions within two distinct cytoplasmic M3R regions, the C-terminal portion of the second intracellular loop (i2) and helix H8 (H8). The pattern of cross-links that we obtained, in combination with molecular modeling studies, was consistent with the existence of two structurally distinct M3R dimer interfaces, one involving i2/i2 contacts (TM4-TM5-i2 interface) and the other one characterized by H8-H8 interactions (TM1-TM2-H8 interface). Specific H8-H8 disulfide cross-links led to significant impairments in M3R-mediated G protein activation, suggesting that changes in the structural orientation or mobility of H8 are critical for efficient receptor-G protein coupling. Our findings provide novel structural and functional insights into the mechanisms involved in M3R dimerization (oligomerization). Because the M3R shows a high degree of sequence similarity with many other class A GPCRs, our findings should be of considerable general interest.     

Making structural sense of dimerization interfaces of delta opioid receptor homodimers

Opioid receptors, like other members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, have been shown to associate to form dimers and/or oligomers at the plasma membrane. Whether this association is stable or transient is not known. Recent compelling evidence suggests that at least some GPCRs rapidly associate and dissociate. We have recently calculated binding affinities from free energy estimates to predict transient association between mouse delta opioid receptor (DOR) protomers at a symmetric interface involving the fourth transmembrane (TM4) helix (herein termed "4" dimer). Here we present disulfide cross-linking experiments with DOR constructs with cysteines substituted at the extracellular ends of TM4 or TM5 that confirm the formation of DOR complexes involving these helices. Our results are consistent with the involvement of TM4 and/or TM5 at the DOR homodimer interface, but possibly with differing association propensities. Coarse-grained (CG) well-tempered metadynamics simulations of two different dimeric arrangements of DOR involving TM4 alone or with TM5 (herein termed "4/5" dimer) in an explicit lipid-water environment confirmed the presence of two structurally and energetically similar configurations of the 4 dimer, as previously assessed by umbrella sampling calculations, and revealed a single energetic minimum of the 4/5 dimer. Additional CG umbrella sampling simulations of the 4/5 dimer indicated that the strength of association between DOR protomers varies depending on the protein region at the interface, with the 4 dimer being more stable than the 4/5 dimer.     

A beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the second intracellular loops of rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors

beta-Arrestins have been shown to inhibit competitively G protein-dependent signaling and to mediate endocytosis for many of the hundreds of nonvisual rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). An open question of fundamental importance concerning the regulation of signal transduction of several hundred rhodopsin-like GPCRs is how these receptors of limited sequence homology, when considered in toto, can all recruit and activate the two highly conserved beta-arrestin proteins as part of their signaling/desensitization process. Although the serine and threonine residues that form GPCR kinase phosphorylation sites are common beta-arrestin-associated receptor determinants regulating receptor desensitization and internalization, the agonist-activated conformation of a GPCR probably reveals the most fundamental determinant mediating the GPCR and arrestin interaction. Here we identified a beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the rhodopsin family GPCRs formed from the proximal 10 residues of the second intracellular loop. We demonstrated by both gain and loss of function studies for the serotonin 2C, beta2-adrenergic, alpha2a)adrenergic, and neuropeptide Y type 2 receptors that the highly conserved amino acids, proline and alanine, naturally occurring in rhodopsin family receptors six residues distal to the highly conserved second loop DRY motif regulate beta-arrestin binding and beta-arrestin-mediated internalization. In particular, as demonstrated for the beta2 AR, this occurs independently of changes in GPCR kinase phosphorylation. These results suggest that a GPCR conformation directed by the second intracellular loop, likely using the loop itself as a binding patch, may function as a switch for transitioning beta-arrestin from its inactive form to its active receptor-binding state.     

Adenosine receptor containing oligomers: their role in the control of dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the brain

While the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization has been questioned during the last fifteen years, the existence of a multi-receptor complex involving direct receptor-receptor interactions, called receptor oligomers, begins to be widely accepted. Eventually, it has been postulated that oligomers constitute a distinct functional form of the GPCRs with essential receptorial features. Also, it has been proven, under certain circumstances, that the GPCR oligomerization phenomenon is crucial for the receptor biosynthesis, maturation, trafficking, plasma membrane diffusion, and pharmacology and signalling. Adenosine receptors are GPCRs that mediate the physiological functions of adenosine and indeed these receptors do also oligomerize. Accordingly, adenosine receptor oligomers may improve the molecular mechanism by which extracellular adenosine signals are transferred to the G proteins in the process of receptor transduction. Importantly, these adenosine receptor-containing oligomers may allow not only the control of the adenosinergic function but also the fine-tuning modulation of other neurotransmitter systems (i.e. dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission). Overall, we underscore here recent significant developments based on adenosine receptor oligomerization that are essential for acquiring a better understanding of neurotransmission in the central nervous system under normal and pathological conditions.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of beta-adrenergic receptors. Identification of conserved cysteine residues that independently affect ligand binding and receptor activation

Using site-directed mutagenesis of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor and continuous expression in B-82 cells, the role of 3 conserved cysteines in transmembrane domains and 2 conserved cysteines in the third extracellular domain in receptor function was examined. Cysteine was replaced with serine in each mutant receptor as this amino acid is similar to cysteine in size but it cannot form disulfide linkages. Replacement of cysteine residues 77 and 327, in the second and seventh transmembrane-spanning domains, respectively, had no effect on ligand binding or the ability of the receptor to mediate isoproterenol stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Substitution of cysteine 285, in the sixth transmembrane domain of the receptor, produced a mutant receptor with normal ligand-binding properties but a significantly attenuated ability to mediate stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Mutation of cysteine residues 190 and 191, in the third extracellular loop of the beta 2 receptor, had qualitatively similar effects on ligand binding and isoproterenol-mediated stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Replacement of either of these residues with serine produced mutant receptors that displayed a marked loss in affinity for both beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists. Replacement of both cysteine 190 and 191 with serine had an even greater effect on the ability of the receptor to bind ligands. Consistent with the loss of Ser190 and/or Ser191 mutant receptor affinity for agonists was a corresponding shift to the right in the dose-response curve for isoproterenol-induced increases in intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations in cells expressing the mutant receptors. These data implicate one of the conserved transmembrane cysteine residues in the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor in receptor activation by agonists and also suggest that conserved cysteine residues in an extracellular domain of the receptor may be involved in ligand binding.     

Activation and inhibition of erythropoietin receptor function: role of receptor dimerization.

Members of the cytokine receptor superfamily have structurally similar extracellular ligand-binding domains yet diverse cytoplasmic regions lacking any obvious catalytic domains. Many of these receptors form ligand-induced oligomers which are likely to participate in transmembrane signaling. A constitutively active (factor-independent) mutant of the erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R), R129C in the exoplasmic domain, forms disulfide-linked homodimers, suggesting that the wild-type EPO-R is activated by ligand-induced homodimerization. Here, we have taken two approaches to probe the role EPO-R dimerization plays in signal transduction. First, on the basis of the crystal structure of the ligand-bound, homodimeric growth hormone receptor (GH-R) and sequence alignment between the GH-R and EPO-R, we identified residues of the EPO-R which may be involved in intersubunit contacts in an EPO-R homodimer. Residue 129 of the EPO-R corresponds to a residue localized to the GH-R dimer interface region. Alanine or cysteine substitutions were introduced at four other residues of the EPO-R predicted to be in the dimer interface region. Substitution of residue E-132 or E-133 with cysteine renders the EPO-R constitutively active. Like the arginine-to-cysteine mutation at position 129 in the exoplasmic domain (R129C), E132C and E133C form disulfide-linked homodimers, suggesting that constitutive activity is due to covalent dimerization. In the second approach, we have coexpressed the wild-type EPO-R with inactive mutants of the receptor missing all or part of the cytosolic domain. These truncated receptors have a dominant inhibitory effect on the proliferative action of the wild-type receptor. Taken together, these results strengthen the hypothesis that an initial step in EPO- and EPO-R-mediated signal transduction is ligand-induced receptor dimerization.     

A comprehensive structure-function map of the intracellular surface of the human C5a receptor. I. Identification of critical residues

G protein-coupled receptors are one of the largest protein families in nature; however, the mechanisms by which they activate G proteins are still poorly understood. To identify residues on the intracellular face of the human C5a receptor that are involved in G protein activation, we performed a genetic analysis of each of the three intracellular loops and the carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor. Amino acid substitutions were randomly incorporated into each loop, and functional receptors were identified in yeast. The third intracellular loop contains the largest number of preserved residues (positions resistant to amino acid substitutions), followed by the second loop, the first loop, and lastly the carboxyl terminus. Surprisingly, complete removal of the carboxyl-terminal tail did not impair C5a receptor signaling. When mapped onto a three-dimensional structural model of the inactive state of the C5a receptor, the preserved residues reside on one half of the intracellular surface of the receptor, creating a potential activation face. Together these data provide one of the most comprehensive functional maps of the intracellular surface of any G protein-coupled receptor to date.     

Changes in conformation at the cytoplasmic ends of the fifth and sixth transmembrane helices of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor in response to ligand binding

The third intracellular loop (IL3) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important contact domain between GPCRs and their G proteins. Previously, the IL3 of Ste2p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPCR, was suggested to undergo a conformational change upon activation as detected by differential protease susceptibility in the presence and absence of ligand. In this study using disulfide cross-linking experiments we show that the Ste2p cytoplasmic ends of helix 5 (TM5) and helix 6 (TM6) that flank the amino and carboxyl sides of IL3 undergo conformational changes upon ligand binding, whereas the center of the IL3 loop does not. Single Cys substitution of residues in the middle of IL3 led to receptors that formed high levels of cross-linked Ste2p, whereas Cys substitution at the interface of IL3 and the contiguous cytoplasmic ends of TM5 and TM6 resulted in minimal disulfide-mediated cross-linked receptor. The alternating pattern of residues involved in cross-linking suggested the presence of a 3(10) helix in the middle of IL3. Agonist (WHWLQLKPGQPNleY) induced Ste2p activation reduced cross-linking mediated by Cys substitutions at the cytoplasmic ends of TM5 and TM6 but not by residues in the middle of IL3. Thus, the cytoplasmic ends of TM5 and TM6 undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. An α-factor antagonist (des-Trp, des-His-α-factor) did not influence disulfide-mediated Ste2p cross-linking, suggesting that the interaction of the N-terminus of α-factor with Ste2p is critical for inducing conformational changes at TM5 and TM6. We propose that the changes in conformation revealed for residues at the ends of TM5 and TM6 are affected by the presence of G protein but not G protein activation. This study provides new information about role of specific residues of a GPCR in signal transduction and how peptide ligand binding activates the receptor.     

Two cytoplasmic loops of the glucagon receptor are required to elevate cAMP or intracellular calcium.

The glucagon receptor is a member of a distinct class of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) sharing little amino acid sequence homology with the larger rhodopsin-like GPCR family. To identify the components of the glucagon receptor necessary for G-protein coupling, we replaced sequentially all or part of each intracellular loop (i1, i2, and i3) and the C-terminal tail of the glucagon receptor with the 11 amino acids comprising the first intracellular loop of the D4 dopamine receptor. When expressed in transiently transfected COS-1 cells, the mutant receptors fell into two different groups with respect to hormone-mediated signaling. The first group included the loop i1 mutants, which bound glucagon and signaled normally. The second group comprised the loop i2 and i3 chimeras, which caused no detectable adenylyl cyclase activation in COS-1 cells. However, when expressed in HEK 293T cells, the loop i2 or i3 chimeras caused very small glucagon-mediated increases in cAMP levels and intracellular calcium concentrations, with EC50 values nearly 100-fold higher than those measured for wild-type receptor. Replacement of both loops i2 and i3 simultaneously was required to completely abolish G protein signaling as measured by both cAMP accumulation and calcium flux assays. These results show that the i2 and i3 loops play a role in glucagon receptor signaling, consistent with recent models for the mechanism of activation of G proteins by rhodopsin-like GPCRs.     

The role of conserved extracellular cysteine residues in vasopressin V2 receptor function and properties of two naturally occurring mutant receptors with additional extracellular cysteine residues

The G protein-coupled vasopressin V2 receptor (V2 receptor) contains a pair of conserved cysteine residues (C112 and C192) which are thought to form a disulfide bond between the first and second extracellular loops. The conserved cysteine residues were found to be important for the correct formation of the ligand binding domain of some G protein-coupled receptors. Here we have assessed the properties of the V2 receptor after site-directed mutagenesis of its conserved cysteine residues in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells. Mutant receptors (C112S, C112A and C192S, C192A) were non-functional and located mostly in the cell's interior. The conserved cysteine residues of the V2 receptor are thus not only important for the structure of the ligand binding domain but also for efficient intracellular receptor transport. In addition to the functional significance of the conserved cysteine residues, we have also analyzed the defects of two mutant V2 receptors which cause X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) by the introduction of additional cysteine residues into the second extracellular loop (mutants G185C, R202C). These mutations are assumed to impair normal disulfide bond formation. Mutant receptor G185C and R202C were efficiently transported to the plasma membrane but were defective in ligand binding. Only in the case of the mutant receptor R202C, the more sensitive adenylyl cyclase activity assay revealed vasopressin-stimulated cAMP formation with a 35-fold increased EC(50) value and with a reduced EC(max), indicating that ligand binding is not completely abolished. Taking the unaffected intracellular transport of both NDI-causing mutant receptors into account, our results indicate that the observed impairment of ligand binding by the additional cysteine residues is not due to the prevention of disulfide bond formation between the conserved cysteine residues.     

Dimerization of G protein-coupled purinergic receptors: increasing the diversity of purinergic receptor signal responses and receptor functions

It is well accepted that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) arrange into dimers or higher-order oligomers that may modify various functions of GPCRs. GPCR-type purinergic receptors (i.e. adenosine and P2Y receptors) tend to form heterodimers with GPCRs not only of the different families but also of the same purinergic receptor families, leading to alterations in functional properties. In the present review, we focus on current knowledge of the formation of heterodimers between metabotropic purinergic receptors that activate novel functions in response to extracellular nucleosides/nucleotides, revealing that the dimerization seems to be employed for ‘fine-tuning’ of purinergic signaling. Thus, the relationship between adenosine and adenosine triphosphate is likely to be more and more intimate than simply being a metabolite of the other.