The secondary importance of primary health care in South Cameroon

Primary health care in Cameroon meets with serious obstacles. The state gives it a low priority in its budget and over-all policy. The health institutions are rarely active in this field. Institutions which do practice some primary health care are usually foreign. The villagers, finally, are little interested. They insist only on improvement of curative services and material life conditions. The conclusion is that primary health care is regarded as something of secondary importance. First comes a better life. The research for this paper was conducted in 1980 in the South of Cameroon.     

Medical therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease in secondary and tertiary care settings

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common. Many patients with recurring or troublesome symptoms are referred for endoscopic examination. Patients seen in secondary care usually have failed OTC or primary care anti-reflux therapy. Acid suppression is the mainstay of healing and maintenance therapy. Increasingly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are preferred above H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), not only for the more severe end of the GERD spectrum but also for patients with mild degrees of esophagitis. Not all patients respond symptomatically to acid suppression, not even with high dose PPI. Prokinetics are mainly useful in the milder degrees of GERD. It is still not clear whether a particular symptom cluster can be recognized for which prokinetics are especially useful. The concept of "step-up versus step-down" approach remains in need for proper validation. Switching from PPIs to cisapride for "step-down" maintenance appears inadequate in practice. All current therapies have shortcomings; H2RAs insufficiently block meal-stimulated acid secretion; long-term strong acid suppression worsens Helicobacter pylori-associated inflammation in the corpus and may accelerate development of atrophy; PPI-potency is substantially weaker in non-H. pylori infected individuals. Optimization of individualized therapy will require more potent and more precisely targeted motility modulating drugs and superior acid/peptic inhibiting pharmaceuticals.     

Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care.

OBJECTIVE--To study the effects of the introduction of electronic data interchange between primary and secondary care providers on speed of communication, efficiency of data handling, and satisfaction of general practitioners with communication. DESIGN--Comparison of traditional paper based communication for laboratory reports and admission-discharge reports between hospital and general practitioners and electronic data interchange. SETTING--Twenty-seven general practitioners whose offices were equipped with a practice information system and two general hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES--Paper based communication was evaluated by questionnaire responses from and interviews with care providers; electronic communication was evaluated by measuring time intervals between generation and delivery of messages and by assessing doctors'' satisfaction with electronic data interchange by questionnaire. RESULTS--Via paper mail admission-discharge reports took a median of 2-4 days, and laboratory reports 2 days, to reach general practitioners. With electronic data interchange almost all admission-discharge reports were available to general practitioners within one hour of generation. When samples were analysed on the day of collection (as was the case for 174/542 samples in one hospital and 443/854 in the other) the laboratory reports were also available to the general practitioner the same day via electronic data interchange. Fifteen general practitioners (of the 24 who returned the questionnaire) reported that the use of electronic admission-discharge reports provided more accurate and complete information about the care delivered to their patients. Ten general practitioners reported that electronic laboratory reports lessened the work of processing the data. CONCLUSION--Electronic communication between primary and secondary care providers is a feasible option for improving communication.     

Equity in the NHS. Monitoring and promoting equity in primary and secondary care.

Although need is often assumed to be the most important factor in determining the use of health services, there are many inequities in the provision and use of NHS services in both primary and secondary care. For example, existing data from district child health information services have been combined with census data for small areas to show wide variations in immunisation rates between affluent and deprived areas. Purchasers of health care are already responsible for assessing health needs and evaluating services, and the process of monitoring equity is a logical extension of these activities. Routine data sources used to collect activity data in both primary and secondary care can be used to assess needs for care and monitor how well these needs are met. Purchasers and providers should collaborate to improve the usefulness of these routine data and to develop a framework for monitoring and promoting equity more systematically.     

Transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care.

General practitioners, especially fundholders, are becoming increasingly concerned about being asked to prescribe treatments for their patients that are outside their therapeutic experience. They are concerned about the clinical responsibility for such prescribing and the effects on their budgets. In some specialties transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care (cost shifting) has become partly institutionalised because of the separate sources of funding for drugs prescribed in the two sectors. With increased efforts to control the rising costs of the drugs budget and the emergence of new expensive treatments, cost shifting will be a challenge to clinicians and purchasers as they strive for rational, cost effective prescribing. A review of the funding mechanisms for drugs prescribing and of the relation between the licensing process and the decision to support the use of a treatment in primary or secondary care is needed.     

Avoidable referrals? Analysis of 170 consecutive referrals to secondary care.

OBJECTIVE--To determine appropriateness of referrals from primary care to secondary care. DESIGN--Retrospective evaluation of appropriateness of referrals from a single-handed general practice: evaluations carried out independently by referring doctor and by second general practitioner who worked in same area and had access to similar secondary care services. SUBJECTS--168 referrals made between 1 October 1990 and 31 March 1991 and followed up for up to 12 months by matching with available information on outcome of episode of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Appropriateness of referral and reasons for inappropriate referrals. RESULTS--110 referrals were agreed to be appropriate and 58 were considered avoidable. The reason for 32 of the inappropriate referrals was lack of resources: 10 were due to lack of information (mainly failure of hospitals to pass on information to general practitioner), nine were due to a deficient primary health care team; five were due to insufficient use of home care nurses, three were due to absence of direct access to day hospital, and five were due to lack of access to general practitioner beds or other facilities. Most of the remaining 26 avoidable referrals were because available resources had not been fully used, because recognised management plans had not been followed, or because of lack of skills to perform certain procedures. CONCLUSIONS--Many theoretically avoidable referrals were due to managers'' and politicians'' decisions about allocation of resources, but some inappropriate referrals could be avoided by assessment of general practitioners'' needs for further knowledge and skills.     

Buccaling under the pressure: influence of secondary care establishments on the prescribing of glyceryl trinitrate buccal tablets in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which characteristics were the best predictors of high rates of prescribing of glyceryl trinitrate buccal tablets. DESIGN: Practice and patient characteristics from 197 practices were examined, and a multiple regression analysis was performed to examine which variables were important in predicting this prescribing. SETTING: Former family health services authority (197 practices). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Volume of prescribing of glyceryl trinitrate buccal tablets. RESULTS: Four variables contributed significantly to a multiple regression model: the catchment area of the secondary care establishment; the number of partners in a practice; the level of practice deprivation; and whether the practice served an urban or a rural area. The model suggests that the most important variable was the catchment area of the secondary care establishment in which the practice was located. CONCLUSION: Although only the prescribing of short acting glyceryl trinitrate buccal tablets was studied, an impact of this size on primary care prescribing may have extensive implications for all drug expenditure in primary care.