Preparation and structural characterization of nucleosomal core particles lacking one H2A.H2B dimer

Nucleosomal core particles lacking one H2A.H2B dimer, (H2A.H2B)1 (H3.H4)2/DNA (146 bp), have been prepared by treatment of nucleosomal cores with dimethylmaleic anhydride, a reversible reagent for protein amino groups. The preparative procedure is simple, produces quantitative conversion of nucleosomal cores into dimer-deficient cores without formation of other subnucleosomal particles, and can be applied to the preparation of different H2A.H2B-deficient mono and oligonucleosomal particles. The structural properties of the dimer-deficient cores and complete nucleosomal cores reconstituted from the deficient particles and H2A.H2B dimers have been studied by DNase I digestion, thermal denaturation and circular dichroism.     

Structure of the Drosophila nucleosome core particle highlights evolutionary constraints on the H2A-H2B histone dimer

We determined the 2.45 A crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle from Drosophila melanogaster and compared it to that of Xenopus laevis bound to the identical 147 base-pair DNA fragment derived from human alpha-satellite DNA. Differences between the two structures primarily reflect 16 amino acid substitutions between species, 15 of which are in histones H2A and H2B. Four of these involve histone tail residues, resulting in subtly altered protein-DNA interactions that exemplify the structural plasticity of these tails. Of the 12 substitutions occurring within the histone core regions, five involve small, solvent-exposed residues not involved in intraparticle interactions. The remaining seven involve buried hydrophobic residues, and appear to have coevolved so as to preserve the volume of side chains within the H2A hydrophobic core and H2A-H2B dimer interface. Thus, apart from variations in the histone tails, amino acid substitutions that differentiate Drosophila from Xenopus histones occur in mutually compensatory combinations. This highlights the tight evolutionary constraints exerted on histones since the vertebrate and invertebrate lineages diverged.     

Role of histone pairs H2A,H2B and H3,H4 in the self-assembly of nucleosome core particles

The role of the histone pairs H2A,H2B and H3,H4 in the kinetics of core particle formation was investigated by using N-(1-pyrene)maleimide-labeled histone H3. The excimer emission intensity of a DNA-core histone complex prepared by direct mixing of DNA and histones in 0.2 m-NaCl is reduced by half when H2A,H2B is omitted. Fluorescence quenching studies and lifetime measurements indicate that the emission differences are probably due to static quenching. In a correctly folded nucleosome or a DNA-(H3,H4) complex, the two pyrene rings are buried and are held very close. DNA-(H3,H4) can interact with additional copies of H3,H4, but only when two dimers of H2A,H2B are correctly bound is there a specific twofold increase in excimer emission.The kinetics of the reaction of H3,H4 with DNA in 0.2 m-NaCl were followed by measuring the increase in 460 nm fluorescence. The apparent rate constant of the dominant kinetic component is ~ 2 × 10^?1 s^?1. If histones H2A,H2B are added immediately after the preparation of the DNA-(H3,H4) complex, an increase in excimer fluorescence is observed, with an apparent rate constant of ~ 6 × 10^?3 s^?1. However, if histones H2A,H2B are added one hour after DNA-(H3,H4) complex formation, there is no increase in excimer fluorescence. These results suggest that an intermediate involving the H3,H4 tetramer is formed first in nucleosome assembly. In the presence of H2A,H2B, this intermediate evolves to the final folded nucleosome, but in the absence of H2A,H2B it rearranges to an unmaturable dead-end complex. Additional experiments show that a very fast transfer of histone pairs (probably H2A,H2B) can take place between partially reconstituted nucleosomes.     

Structural basis of nucleosome dynamics modulation by histone variants H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2

Nucleosomes are dynamic entities with wide‐ranging compositional variations. Human histone variants H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2 play critical roles in multiple biological processes by forming unstable nucleosomes and open chromatin structures, but how H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2 confer these dynamic features to nucleosomes remains unclear. Here, we report cryo‐EM structures of nucleosome core particles containing human H2A.B (H2A.B‐NCP) at atomic resolution, identifying large‐scale structural rearrangements in the histone octamer in H2A.B‐NCP. H2A.B‐NCP compacts approximately 103 bp of DNA wrapping around the core histones in approximately 1.2 left‐handed superhelical turns, in sharp contrast to canonical nucleosome encompassing approximately 1.7 turns of DNA. Micrococcal nuclease digestion assay reveals that nineteen H2A.B‐specific residues, including a ROF (“regulating‐octamer‐folding”) sequence of six consecutive residues, are responsible for loosening of H2A.B‐NCPs. Unlike H2A.B‐NCP, the H2A.Z.2.2‐containing nucleosome (Z.2.2‐NCP) adopts a less‐extended structure and compacts around 125 bp of DNA. Further investigation uncovers a crucial role for the H2A.Z.2.2‐specific ROF in both H2A.Z.2.2‐NCP opening and SWR1‐dependent histone replacement. Taken together, these first high‐resolution structure of unstable nucleosomes induced by histone H2A variants elucidate specific functions of H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2 in enhancing chromatin dynamics.     

Mutational analysis of the stability of the H2A and H2B histone monomers

The eukaryotic histone heterodimer H2A-H2B folds through an obligatory dimeric intermediate that forms in a nearly diffusion-limited association reaction in the stopped-flow dead time. It is unclear whether there is partial folding of the isolated monomers before association. To address the possible contributions of structure in the monomers to the rapid association, we characterized H2A and H2B monomers in the absence of their heterodimeric partner. By far-UV circular dichroism, the H2A and H2B monomers are 15% and 31% helical, respectively—significantly less than observed in X-ray crystal structures. Acrylamide quenching of the intrinsic Tyr fluorescence was indicative of tertiary structure. The H2A and H2B monomers exhibit free energies of unfolding of 2.5 and 2.9 kcal mol^− 1, respectively; at 10 μM, the sum of the stability of the monomers is ∼ 60% of the stability of the native dimer. The helical content, stability, and m values indicate that H2B has a more stable, compact structure than H2A. The monomer m values are larger than expected for the extended histone fold motif, suggesting that the monomers adopt an overly collapsed structure. Stopped-flow refolding—initiated from urea-denatured monomers or the partially folded monomers populated at low denaturant concentrations—yielded essentially identical rates, indicating that monomer folding is productive in the rapid association and folding of the heterodimer. A series of Ala and Gly mutations were introduced into H2A and H2B to probe the importance of helix propensity on the structure and stability of the monomers. The mutational studies show that the central α-helix of the histone fold, which makes extensive intermonomer contacts, is structured in H2B but only partially folded in H2A.     

AFM imaging of protein movements: histone H2A-H2B release during nucleosome remodeling

Being able to follow assembly/disassembly reactions of biomolecular complexes directly at the single molecule level would be very useful. Here, we use an AFM technique that can simultaneously obtain topographic images and identify the locations of a specific type of protein within those images to monitor the histone H2A component of nucleosomes acted on by human Swi-Snf, an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complex. Activation of remodeling results in significant H2A release from nucleosomes, based on recognition imaging and nucleosome height changes, and changes in the recognition patterns of H2A associated directly with hSwi-Snf complexes.     

Histone H2A/H2B dimer exchange by ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities function to manipulate chromatin structure during gene regulation. One of the ways in which they do this is by altering the positions of nucleosomes along DNA. Here we provide support for the ability of these complexes to move nucleosomes into positions in which DNA is unraveled from one edge. This is expected to result in the loss of histone-DNA contacts that are important for retention of one H2A/H2B dimer within the nucleosome. Consistent with this we find that several chromatin remodeling complexes are capable of catalyzing the exchange of H2A/H2B dimers between chromatin fragments in an ATP-dependent reaction. This provides eukaryotes with additional means by which they may manipulate chromatin structure.     

Nucleosome assembly protein 1 exchanges histone H2A-H2B dimers and assists nucleosome sliding

Eukaryotic chromatin is highly dynamic and turns over rapidly even in the absence of DNA replication. Here we show that the acidic histone chaperone nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1) from yeast reversibly removes and replaces histone protein dimer H2A-H2B or histone variant dimers from assembled nucleosomes, resulting in active histone exchange. Transient removal of H2A-H2B dimers facilitates nucleosome sliding along the DNA to a thermodynamically favorable position. Histone exchange as well as nucleosome sliding is independent of ATP and relies on the presence of the C-terminal acidic domain of yeast NAP-1, even though this region is not required for histone binding and chromatin assembly. Our results suggest a novel role for NAP-1 (and perhaps other acidic histone chaperones) in mediating chromatin fluidity by incorporating histone variants and assisting nucleosome sliding. NAP-1 may function either untargeted (if acting alone) or may be targeted to specific regions within the genome through interactions with additional factors.     

Isolation of yeast histone genes H2A and H2B

Analysis of cloned sequences for yeast histone genes H2A and H2B reveals that there are only two copies of this pair of genes within the haploid yeast genome. Within each copy, the genes for H2A and H2B are separated by approximately 700 bp of spacer DNA. The two copies are separated from one another in the yeast genome by a minimum distance of 35-60 kb. Sequence homology between the two copies is restricted to the genes for H2A and H2B; the spacer DNA between the genes is nonhomologous. In both copies, the genes for H2A and H2B are divergently transcribed. In addition, both plasmids code for other nonhistone proteins. Sequences coding for histones H3 and H4 have not been detected in the immediate vicinity of the genes for H2A and H2B.