Response to András Szilágyi's Commentary

In a commentary to our article on protein domain size, András Szilágyi suggests our findings are a mathematical artifact. In examining his concerns, we believe they are possibly a result of misunderstandings, errors of fact, and philosophical approach. Proteins 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

SREBP‐1c,Pdx‐1, and GLP‐1R involved in palmitate–EPA regulated glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion in INS‐1 cells

Impairment of glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) caused by glucolipotoxicity is an essential feature in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Palmitate and eicosapentaenoate (EPA), because of their lipotoxicity and protection effect, were found to impair or restore the GSIS in beta cells. Furthermore, palmitate was found to up‐regulate the expression level of sterol regulatory element‐binding protein (SREBP)‐1c and down‐regulate the levels of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox (Pdx)‐1 and glucagon‐like peptide (GLP)‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) in INS‐1 cells. To investigate the underlying mechanism, the lentiviral system was used to knock‐down or over‐express SREBP‐1c and Pdx‐1, respectively. It was found that palmitate failed to suppress the expression of Pdx‐1 and GLP‐1R in SREBP‐1c‐deficient INS‐1 cells. Moreover, down‐regulation of Pdx‐1 could cause the low expression of GLP‐1R with/without palmitate treatment. Additionally, either SREBP‐1c down‐regulation or Pdx‐1 over‐expression could partially alleviate palmitate‐induced GSIS impairment. These results suggested that sequent SREBP‐1c‐Pdx‐1‐GLP‐1R signal pathway was involved in the palmitate‐caused GSIS impairment in beta cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 111: 634–642, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

AP-1 Membrane–Cytoplasm Recycling Regulated by μ1A-Adaptin

The adaptor protein complex AP-1 mediates vesicular protein sorting between the trans Golgi network and endosomes. AP-1 recycles between membranes and the cytoplasm together with clathrin during transport vesicle formation and vesicle uncoating. AP-1 recycles independent of clathrin, indicating binding to unproductive membrane domains and premature termination of vesicle budding. Membrane recruitment requires ADP ribosylation factor-1-GTP, a transmembrane protein containing an AP-1-binding motif and phosphatidyl-inositol phosphate (PI-4-P). Little is known about the regulation of AP-1 membrane–cytoplasm recycling. We identified the N-terminal domain of μ1A-adaptin as being involved in the regulation of AP-1 membrane–cytoplasm recycling by constructing chimeras of μ1A and its homologue μ2. The AP-1* complex containing this μ2–μ1A chimera had slowed down recycling kinetics, resulting in missorting of mannose 6-phosphate receptors. The N-terminal domain is only accessible from the cytoplasmic AP-1 surface. None of the proteins known to influence AP-1 membrane recycling bound to this μ1A domain, indicating the regulation of AP-1 membrane–cytoplasm recycling by an yet unidentified cytoplasmic protein.     

Potential of the bean α‐amylase inhibitor αAI‐1 to inhibit α‐amylase activity in true bugs (Hemiptera)

True bugs (Hemiptera) are an important pest complex not controlled by Bt‐transgenic crops. An alternative source of resistance includes inhibitors of digestive enzymes, such as protease or amylase inhibitors. αAI‐1, an α‐amylase inhibitor from the common bean, inhibits gut‐associated α‐amylases of bruchid pests of grain legumes. Here we quantify the in vitro activity of α‐amylases of 12 hemipteran species from different taxonomic and functional groups and the in vitro inhibition of those α‐amylases by αAI‐1. α‐Amylase activity was detected in all species tested. However, susceptibility to αAI‐1 varied among the different groups. α‐Amylases of species in the Lygaeidae, Miridae and Nabidae were highly susceptible, whereas those in the Auchenorrhyncha (Cicadellidae, Membracidae) had a moderate susceptibility, and those in the Pentatomidae seemed to be tolerant to αAI‐1. The species with αAI‐1 susceptible α‐amylases represented families which include both important pest species but also predatory species. These findings suggest that αAI‐1‐expressing crops have potential to control true bugs in vivo.     

lac‐1 and lag‐1 with ras‐1 affect aging and the biological clock in Neurospora crassa

Using an automated cell counting technique developed previously (Case et al., Ecology and Evolution 2014; 4: 3494), we explore the lifespan effects of lac‐1, a ceramide synthase gene paralogous to lag‐1 in Neurospora crassa in conjunction with the band bd (ras‐1) gene. We find that the replicative lifespan of a lac‐1^KO bd double mutants is short, about one race tube cycle, and this double mutant lacks a strong ~21‐hr clock cycle as shown by race tube and fluorometer analysis of fluorescent strains including lac‐1^KO. This short replicative lifespan phenotype is contrasted with a very long estimated chronological lifespan for lac‐1^KO bd double mutants from 247 to 462 days based on our regression analyses on log viability, and for the single mutant lac‐1^KO, 161 days. Both of these estimated lifespans are much higher than that of previously studied WT and bd single mutant strains. In a lac‐1 rescue and induction experiment, the expression of lac‐1⁺ as driven by a quinic acid‐dependent promoter actually decreases the median chronological lifespan of cells down to only 7 days, much lower than the 34‐day median lifespan found in control bd conidia also grown on quinic acid media, which we interpret as an effect of balancing selection acting on ceramide levels based on previous findings from the literature. Prior work has shown phytoceramides can act as a signal for apoptosis in stressed N. crassa cells. To test this hypothesis of balancing selection on phytoceramide levels, we examine the viability of WT, lag‐1^KO bd, and lac‐1^KO bd strains following the dual stresses of heat and glycolysis inhibition, along with phytoceramide treatments of different dosages. We find that the phytoceramide dosage–response curve is altered in the lag‐1^KO bd mutant, but not in the lac‐1^KO bd mutant. We conclude that phytoceramide production is responsible for the previously reported longevity effects in the lag‐1^KO bd mutant, but a different ceramide may be responsible for the longevity effect observed in the lac‐1^KO bd mutant.     

α1 adrenoceptor activation by norepinephrine inhibits LPS‐induced cardiomyocyte TNF‐α production via modulating ERK1/2 and NF‐κB pathway

Cardiomyocyte tumour necrosis factor α (TNF‐α) production contributes to myocardial depression during sepsis. This study was designed to observe the effect of norepinephrine (NE) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced cardiomyocyte TNF‐α expression and to further investigate the underlying mechanisms in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and endotoxaemic mice. In cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, NE inhibited LPS‐induced TNF‐α production in a dose‐dependent manner. α₁‐ adrenoceptor (AR) antagonist (prazosin), but neither β₁‐ nor β₂‐AR antagonist, abrogated the inhibitory effect of NE on LPS‐stimulated TNF‐α production. Furthermore, phenylephrine (PE), an α₁‐AR agonist, also suppressed LPS‐induced TNF‐α production. NE inhibited p38 phosphorylation and NF‐κB activation, but enhanced extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation and c‐Fos expression in LPS‐treated cardiomyocytes, all of which were reversed by prazosin pre‐treatment. To determine whether ERK1/2 regulates c‐Fos expression, p38 phosphorylation, NF‐κB activation and TNF‐α production, cardiomyocytes were also treated with U0126, a selective ERK1/2 inhibitor. Treatment with U0126 reversed the effects of NE on c‐Fos expression, p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation and TNF‐α production, but not NF‐κB activation in LPS‐challenged cardiomyocytes. In addition, pre‐treatment with SB202190, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, partly inhibited LPS‐induced TNF‐α production in cardiomyocytes. In endotoxaemic mice, PE promoted myocardial ERK1/2 phosphorylation and c‐Fos expression, inhibited p38 phosphorylation and IκBα degradation, reduced myocardial TNF‐α production and prevented LPS‐provoked cardiac dysfunction. Altogether, these findings indicate that activation of α₁‐AR by NE suppresses LPS‐induced cardiomyocyte TNF‐α expression and improves cardiac dysfunction during endotoxaemia via promoting myocardial ERK phosphorylation and suppressing NF‐κB activation.     

The impact of Arabidopsis thaliana SNF1‐related‐kinase 1 (SnRK1)‐activating kinase 1 (SnAK1) and SnAK2 on SnRK1 phosphorylation status: characterization of a SnAK double mutant

Arabidopsis thaliana SNF1‐related‐kinase 1 (SnRK1)‐activating kinase 1 (AtSnAK1) and AtSnAK2 have been shown to phosphorylate in vitro and activate the energy signalling integrator, SnRK1. To clarify this signalling cascade in planta, a genetic‐ and molecular‐based approach was developed. Homozygous single AtSnAK1 and AtSnAK2 T‐DNA insertional mutants did not display an apparent phenotype. Crossing of the single mutants did not allow the isolation of double‐mutant plants, whereas self‐pollinating the S1?/? S2+/? sesquimutant specifically gave approximatively 22% individuals in their offspring that, when rescued on sugar‐supplemented media in vitro, were shown to be AtSnAK1 AtSnAK2 double mutants. Interestingly, this was not obtained in the case of the other sesquimutant, S1+/? S2?/?. Although reduced in size, the double mutant had the capacity to produce flowers, but not seeds. Immunological characterization established the T‐loop of the SnRK1 catalytic subunit to be non‐phosphorylated in the absence of both SnAKs. When the double mutant was complemented with a DNA construct containing an AtSnAK2 open reading frame driven by its own promoter, a normal phenotype was restored. Therefore, wild‐type plant growth and development is dependent on the presence of SnAK in vivo, and this is correlated with SnRK1 phosphorylation. These data show that both SnAKs are kinases phosphorylating SnRK1, and thereby they contribute to energy signalling in planta.     

Comparative <Superscript>1</Superscript>H NMR-based metabonomic analysis of HIV-1 sera

¹H NMR spectroscopy of sera from HIV-1 infected and uninfected individuals was performed on 300 and 600 MHz instruments. The resultant spectra were automatically data reduced to 90 and 180 integral segments of equal length. Analysis of variance identified significant differences between the sample groups, especially for the samples analyzed on 600 MHz and reduced to fewer segments. Linear discriminant analysis correctly classified 100% of the samples analyzed on the 300 MHz NMR (reduced to 180 segments); an increase in instrument sensitivity resulted in lower percentages of correctly classified samples. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) resulted in 100% correct classification of all samples from both instruments. Thus ¹H-NMR metabonomics on either instrument distinguishes HIV-positive individuals using or not using anti retroviral therapy, but the sensitivity of the instrument impacts on data reduction. Furthermore, MLR is a novel multivariate statistical technique for improved classification of biological data analyzed in NMR. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Re‐examining how Munc13‐1 facilitates opening of syntaxin‐1

Munc13‐1 is crucial for neurotransmitter release and, together with Munc18‐1, orchestrates assembly of the neuronal SNARE complex formed by syntaxin‐1, SNAP‐25, and synaptobrevin. Assembly starts with syntaxin‐1 folded into a self‐inhibited closed conformation that binds to Munc18‐1. Munc13‐1 is believed to catalyze the opening of syntaxin‐1 to facilitate SNARE complex formation. However, different types of Munc13‐1‐syntaxin‐1 interactions have been reported to underlie this activity, and the critical nature of Munc13‐1 for release may arise because of its key role in bridging the vesicle and plasma membranes. To shed light into the mechanism of action of Munc13‐1, we have used NMR spectroscopy, SNARE complex assembly experiments, and liposome fusion assays. We show that point mutations in a linker region of syntaxin‐1 that forms intrinsic part of the closed conformation strongly impair stimulation of SNARE complex assembly and liposome fusion mediated by Munc13‐1 fragments, even though binding of this linker region to Munc13‐1 is barely detectable. Conversely, the syntaxin‐1 SNARE motif clearly binds to Munc13‐1, but a mutation that disrupts this interaction does not affect SNARE complex assembly or liposome fusion. We also show that Munc13‐1 cannot be replaced by an artificial tethering factor to mediate liposome fusion. Overall, these results emphasize how very weak interactions can play fundamental roles in promoting conformational transitions and strongly support a model whereby the critical nature of Munc13‐1 for neurotransmitter release arises not only from its ability to bridge two membranes but also from an active role in opening syntaxin‐1 via interactions with the linker.