DNA 去甲基化机制的研究进展*

DNA甲基化作为动植物体内一种重要的表观遗传修饰形式,在调控基因表达、维持基因组的稳定性等方面发挥重要的生物学作用。固有DNA甲基化水平和模式的变化会导致生物的表型异常甚至死亡。而5-甲基胞嘧啶的水平和模式是由DNA甲基化和去甲基化共同决定的。DNA去甲基化可以分为主动去甲基化与被动去甲基化,而基因组甲基化模式的形成主要依赖于主动去甲基化。本文综述了生物体内DNA主动去甲基化五种潜在机制:DNA转葡糖基酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、脱氨酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、核苷酸切除修复途径、氧化作用去甲基化与水解作用去甲基化。     

DNA excision repair proteins and Gadd45 as molecular players for active DNA demethylation

DNA cytosine methylation represents an intrinsic modification signal of the genome that plays important roles in heritable gene silencing, heterochromatin formation and certain transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. In contrast to the process of DNA methylation that is catalyzed by specific classes of methyltransferases, molecular players underlying active DNA demethylation have long been elusive. Emerging biochemical and functional evidence suggests that active DNA demethylation in vertebrates can be mediated through DNA excision repair enzymes, similar to the well-known repair-based DNA demethylation mechanism in Arabidopsis. As key regulators, non-enzymatic Gadd45 proteins function to recruit enzymatic machineries and promote coupling of deamination, base and nucleotide-excision repair in the process of DNA demethylation. In this article, we review recent findings and discuss functional and evolutionary implications of such mechanisms underlying active DNA demethylation.     

Active DNA demethylation and DNA repair

DNA methylation on cytosine is an epigenetic modification and is essential for gene regulation and genome stability in vertebrates. Traditionally DNA methylation was considered as the most stable of all heritable epigenetic marks. However, it has become clear that DNA methylation is reversible by enzymatic “active” DNA demethylation, with examples in plant cells, animal development and immune cells. It emerges that “pruning” of methylated cytosines by active DNA demethylation is an important determinant for the DNA methylation signature of a cell. Work in plants and animals shows that demethylation occurs by base excision and nucleotide excision repair. Far from merely protecting genomic integrity from environmental insult, DNA repair is therefore at the heart of an epigenetic activation process.     

DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance

Classical genetics has revealed the mechanisms for the transmission of genes from generation to generation, but the strategy of the genes in unfolding the developmental programme remains obscure. Epigenetics comprises the study of the mechanisms that impart temporal and spatial control on the activities of all those genes required for the development of a complex organism from the zygote to the adult. Epigenetic changes in gene activity can be studied in relation to DNA methylation in cultured mammalian cells and it is also possible to isolate and characterize mutants with altered DNA methylase activity. Although this experimental system is quite far removed from the epigenetic controls acting during development it does provide the means to clarify the rules governing the silencing of genes by specific DNA methylation and their reactivation by demethylation. This in turn will facilitate studies on the control of gene expression in somatic cells of the developing organism or the adult. The general principles of epigenetic mechanisms can be defined. There are extreme contrasts between instability or switches in gene expression, such as those in stem-line cells, and the stable heritability of a specialized pattern of gene activities. In some situations cell lineages are known to be important, whereas in others coordinated changes in groups of cells have been demonstrated. Control of numbers of cell divisions and the size of organisms, or parts of organisms, is also essential. The epigenetic determination of gene expression can be reversed or reprogrammed in the germ line. The extent to which methylation or demethylation of specific DNA sequences can help explain these basic epigenetic mechanisms is briefly reviewed.     

Gemcitabine functions epigenetically by inhibiting repair mediated DNA demethylation

Gemcitabine is a cytotoxic cytidine analog, which is widely used in anti-cancer therapy. One mechanism by which gemcitabine acts is by inhibiting nucleotide excision repair (NER). Recently NER was implicated in Gadd45 mediated DNA demethylation and epigenetic gene activation. Here we analyzed the effect of gemcitabine on DNA demethylation. We find that gemcitabine inhibits specifically Gadd45a mediated reporter gene activation and DNA demethylation, similar to the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, which also inhibits NER. In contrast, base excision repair inhibitors had no effect on DNA demethylation. In Xenopus oocytes, gemcitabine inhibits DNA repair synthesis accompanying demethylation of oct4. In mammalian cells, gemcitabine induces DNA hypermethylation and silencing of MLH1. The results indicate that gemcitabine induces epigenetic gene silencing by inhibiting repair mediated DNA demethylation. Thus, gemcitabine can function epigenetically and provides a tool to manipulate DNA methylation.     

Mammalian DNA demethylation

DNA cytosine methylation is a reversible epigenetic mark regulating gene expression. Aberrant methylation profiles are concomitant with developmental defects and cancer. Numerous studies in the past decade have identified enzymes and pathways responsible for active DNA demethylation both on a genome-wide as well as gene-specific scale. Recent findings have strengthened the idea that 5-methylcytosine oxidation catalyzed by members of the ten-eleven translocation (Tet1–3) oxygenases in conjunction with replication-coupled dilution of the conversion products causes the majority of genome-wide erasure of methylation marks during early development. In contrast, short and long patch DNA excision repair seems to be implicated mainly in gene-specific demethylation. Growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein 45 a (Gadd45a) regulates gene-specific demethylation within regulatory sequences of limited lengths raising the question of how such site specificity is achieved. A new study identified the protein inhibitor of growth 1 (Ing1) as a reader of the active chromatin mark histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3). Ing1 binds and directs Gadd45a to target sites, thus linking the histone code with DNA demethylation.     

An epigenetic code for DNA damage repair pathways?

Exposure of living cells to intracellular or external mutagens results in DNA damage. Accumulation of DNA damage can lead to serious consequences because of the deleterious mutation rate resulting in genomic instability, cellular senescence, and cell death. To counteract genotoxic stress, cells have developed several strategies to detect defects in DNA structure. The eukaryotic genomic DNA is packaged through histone and nonhistone proteins into a highly condensed structure termed chromatin. Therefore the cellular enzymatic machineries responsible for DNA replication, recombination, and repair must circumvent this natural barrier in order to gain access to the DNA. Several studies have demonstrated that histone/chromatin modifications such as acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation play crucial roles in DNA repair processes. This review will summarize the recent data that suggest a regulatory role of the epigenetic code in DNA repair processes. We will mainly focus on different covalent reversible modifications of histones as an initial step in early response to DNA damage and subsequent DNA repair. Special focus on a potential epigenetic histone code for these processes will be given in the last section. We also discuss new technologies and strategies to elucidate the putative epigenetic code for each of the DNA repair processes discussed.     

GADD45A protein plays an essential role in active DNA demethylation during terminal osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Methylation and demethylation of DNA are the complementary processes of epigenetic regulation. These two types of regulation influence a diverse array of cellular activities, including the maintenance of pluripotency and self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. It was generally believed that DNA demethylation occurs passively over several cycles of DNA replication and that active DNA demethylation is rare. Recently, evidence for active DNA demethylation has been obtained in several cancer, neuronal, and embryonic stem cell lines. Studies in embryonic stem cell models, however, suggested that active DNA demethylation might be restricted to the early development of progenitor cells. Whether active demethylation is involved in terminal differentiation of adult stem cells is poorly understood. We provide evidence that active DNA demethylation does occur during terminal specification of stem cells in an adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived osteogenic differentiation model. The medium CpG regions in promoters of the Dlx5, Runx2, Bglap, and Osterix osteogenic lineage-specific genes were demethylated during the increase in gene expression associated with osteogenic differentiation. The growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein GADD45A was up-regulated in these processes. Knockdown of GADD45A led to hypermethylation of Dlx5, Runx2, Bglap, and Osterix promoters, followed by suppression of the expression of these genes and interruption of osteogenic differentiation. These results reveal that GADD45A plays an essential role in gene-specific active DNA demethylation during adult stem cell differentiation. They enhance the current knowledge of osteogenic specification and may also lead to a better understanding of the common mechanisms underlying epigenetic regulation in adult stem cell differentiation.     

Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair

DNA methylation is a major epigenetic mechanism for gene silencing. Whereas methyltransferases mediate cytosine methylation, it is less clear how unmethylated regions in mammalian genomes are protected from de novo methylation and whether an active demethylating activity is involved. Here, we show that either knockout or catalytic inactivation of the DNA repair enzyme thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) leads to embryonic lethality in mice. TDG is necessary for recruiting p300 to retinoic acid (RA)-regulated promoters, protection of CpG islands from hypermethylation, and active demethylation of tissue-specific developmentally and hormonally regulated promoters and enhancers. TDG interacts with the deaminase AID and the damage response protein GADD45a. These findings highlight a dual role for TDG in promoting proper epigenetic states during development and suggest a two-step mechanism for DNA demethylation in mammals, whereby 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine are first deaminated by AID to thymine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil, respectively, followed by TDG-mediated thymine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil excision repair.     

Dynamic link of DNA demethylation,DNA strand breaks and repair in mouse zygotes

In mammalian zygotes, the 5‐methyl‐cytosine (5mC) content of paternal chromosomes is rapidly changed by a yet unknown but presumably active enzymatic mechanism. Here, we describe the developmental dynamics and parental asymmetries of DNA methylation in relation to the presence of DNA strand breaks, DNA repair markers and a precise timing of zygotic DNA replication. The analysis shows that distinct pre‐replicative (active) and replicative (active and passive) phases of DNA demethylation can be observed. These phases of DNA demethylation are concomitant with the appearance of DNA strand breaks and DNA repair markers such as γH2A.X and PARP‐1, respectively. The same correlations are found in cloned embryos obtained after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Together, the data suggest that (1) DNA‐methylation reprogramming is more complex and extended as anticipated earlier and (2) the DNA demethylation, particularly the rapid loss of 5mC in paternal DNA, is likely to be linked to DNA repair mechanisms.     

Local chromatin microenvironment determines DNMT activity: from DNA methyltransferase to DNA demethylase or DNA dehydroxymethylase

Insights on active DNA demethylation disproved the original assumption that DNA methylation is a stable epigenetic modification. Interestingly, mammalian DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B (DNMT-3A and -3B) have also been reported to induce active DNA demethylation, in addition to their well-known function in catalyzing methylation. In situations of extremely low levels of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), DNMT-3A and -3B might demethylate C-5 methyl cytosine (5mC) via deamination to thymine, which is subsequently replaced by an unmodified cytosine through the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Alternatively, 5mC when converted to 5- hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by TET enzymes, might be further modified to an unmodified cytosine by DNMT-3A and -3B under oxidized redox conditions, although exact pathways are yet to be elucidated. Interestingly, even direct conversion of 5mC to cytosine might be catalyzed by DNMTs. Here, we summarize the evidence on the DNA dehydroxymethylase and demethylase activity of DNMT-3A and -3B. Although physiological relevance needs to be demonstrated, the current indications on the 5mC- and 5hmC-modifying activities of de novo DNA C-5 methyltransferases shed a new light on these enzymes. Despite the extreme circumstances required for such unexpected reactions to occur, we here put forward that the chromatin microenvironment can be locally exposed to extreme conditions, and hypothesize that such waves of extremes allow enzymes to act in differential ways.     

哺乳动物中的DNA主动去甲基化

DNA甲基化是一种相对稳定且可遗传的表观遗传标记,在植物和动物细胞中均发现有DNA主动去甲基化现象,其机制在植物中已基本得到阐释,但在哺乳动物中尚未鉴定出一种有效的DNA去甲基化酶,并且DNA主动去甲基化途径也存在争议。文章综合分析了近期的文献资料,阐述了哺乳动物中发生DNA主动去甲基化的时空特异性,并从细胞和组织特异性角度介绍DNA主动去甲基化的可能通路和机制,即5-甲基胞嘧啶的氧化作用、5-甲基胞嘧啶脱氨基以及DNA修复等,旨在为破译表观遗传重编程过程提供理论依据。     

Dual control of ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation by DNA damage‐binding protein 2 (DDB2)

By controlling gene expression, DNA methylation contributes to key regulatory processes during plant development. Genomic methylation patterns are dynamic and must be properly maintained and/or re‐established upon DNA replication and active removal, and therefore require sophisticated control mechanisms. Here we identify direct interplay between the DNA repair factor DNA damage‐binding protein 2 (DDB2) and the ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. We show that DDB2 forms a complex with ROS1 and AGO4 and that they act at the ROS1 locus to modulate levels of DNA methylation and therefore ROS1 expression. We found that DDB2 represses enzymatic activity of ROS1. DNA demethylation intermediates generated by ROS1 are processed by the DNA 3′‐phosphatase ZDP and the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1L, and we also show that DDB2 interacts with both enzymes and stimulates their activities. Taken together, our results indicate that DDB2 acts as a critical regulator of ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation.     

The mechanism and function of active DNA demethylation in plants

DNA methylation is a conserved and important epigenetic mark in both mammals and plants.DNA methylation can be dynamically established,maintained,and removed through different pathways.In plants,active DNA demethylation is initiated by the RELEASE OF SILENCING 1(ROS1)family of bifunctional DNA glycosylases/lyases.Accumulating evidence suggests that DNA demethylation is important in many processes in plants.In this review,we summarize recent studies on the enzymes and regulatory factors that have been identified in the DNA demethylation pathway.We also review the functions of active DNA demethylation in plant development as well as biotic and abiotic stress responses.Finally,we highlight those aspects of DNA demethylation that require additional research.     

Enzymatic DNA oxidation: mechanisms and biological significance

DNA methylation at cytosines (5mC) is a major epigenetic modification involved in the regulation of multiple biological processes in mammals. How methylation is reversed was until recently poorly understood. The family of dioxygenases commonly known as Ten-eleven translocation (Tet) proteins are responsible for the oxidation of 5mC into three new forms, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). Current models link Tet-mediated 5mC oxidation with active DNA demethylation. The higher oxidation products (5fC and 5caC) are recognized and excised by the DNA glycosylase TDG via the base excision repair pathway. Like DNA methyltransferases, Tet enzymes are important for embryonic development. We will examine the mechanism and biological significance of Tet-mediated 5mC oxidation in the context of pronuclear DNA demethylation in mouse early embryos. In contrast to its role in active demethylation in the germ cells and early embryo, a number of lines of evidence suggest that the intragenic 5hmC present in brain may act as a stable mark instead. This short review explores mechanistic aspects of TET oxidation activity, the impact Tet enzymes have on epigenome organization and their contribution to the regulation of early embryonic and neuronal development. [BMB Reports 2014; 47(11): 609-618]