The domain structure of talin: Residues 1815-1973 form a five-helix bundle containing a cryptic vinculin-binding site

Talin is a large flexible rod-shaped protein that activates the integrin family of cell adhesion molecules and couples them to cytoskeletal actin. Its rod region consists of a series of helical bundles. Here we show that residues 1815-1973 form a 5-helix bundle, with a topology unique to talin which is optimally suited for formation of a long rod such as talin. This is much more stable than the 4-helix (1843-1973) domain described earlier and as a result its vinculin binding sequence is inaccessible to vinculin at room temperature, with implications for the overall mechanism of the talin-vinculin interaction.

Structured summary

MINT-7722300, MINT-7760951: Talin-1 (uniprotkb:P26039) and Vinculin (uniprotkb:P12003) bind (MI:0407) by molecular sieving (MI:0071)     

The activity of the vinculin binding sites in talin is influenced by the stability of the helical bundles that make up the talin rod

The talin rod contains approximately 11 vinculin binding sites (VBSs), each defined by hydrophobic residues in a series of amphipathic helices that are normally buried within the helical bundles that make up the rod. Consistent with this, talin failed to compete for binding of the vinculin Vd1 domain to an immobilized talin polypeptide containing a constitutively active VBS. However, talin did bind to GST-Vd1 in pull-down assays, and isothermal titration calorimetry measurements indicate a K(d) of approximately 9 mum. Interestingly, Vd1 binding exposed a trypsin cleavage site in the talin rod between residues 898 and 899, indicating that there are one or more active VBSs in the N-terminal part of the talin rod. This region comprises a five helix bundle (residues 482-655) followed by a seven-helix bundle (656-889) and contains five VBSs (helices 4, 6, 9, 11, and 12). The single VBS within 482-655 is cryptic at room temperature. In contrast, talin 482-889 binds Vd1 with high affinity (K(d) approximately 0.14 mum), indicating that one or more of the four VBSs within 656-889 are active, and this likely represents the vinculin binding region in intact talin. In support of this, hemagglutinin-tagged talin 482-889 localized efficiently to focal adhesions, whereas 482-655 did not. Differential scanning calorimetry showed a strong negative correlation between Vd1 binding and helical bundle stability, and a 755-889 mutant with a more stable fold bound Vd1 much less well than wild type. We conclude that the stability of the helical bundles that make up the talin rod is an important factor determining the activity of the individual VBSs.     

Talin rod domain–containing protein 1 (TLNRD1) is a novel actin-bundling protein which promotes filopodia formation

Talin is a mechanosensitive adapter protein that couples integrins to the cytoskeleton. Talin rod domain–containing protein 1 (TLNRD1) shares 22% homology with the talin R7R8 rod domains, and is highly conserved throughout vertebrate evolution, although little is known about its function. Here we show that TLNRD1 is an α-helical protein structurally homologous to talin R7R8. Like talin R7R8, TLNRD1 binds F-actin, but because it forms a novel antiparallel dimer, it also bundles F-actin. In addition, it binds the same LD motif–containing proteins, RIAM and KANK, as talin R7R8. In cells, TLNRD1 localizes to actin bundles as well as to filopodia. Increasing TLNRD1 expression enhances filopodia formation and cell migration on 2D substrates, while TLNRD1 down-regulation has the opposite effect. Together, our results suggest that TLNRD1 has retained the diverse interactions of talin R7R8, but has developed distinct functionality as an actin-bundling protein that promotes filopodia assembly.     

Activation of a vinculin-binding site in the talin rod involves rearrangement of a five-helix bundle

The interaction between the cytoskeletal proteins talin and vinculin plays a key role in integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration. We have determined the crystal structures of two domains from the talin rod spanning residues 482–789. Talin 482–655, which contains a vinculin-binding site (VBS), folds into a five-helix bundle whereas talin 656–789 is a four-helix bundle. We show that the VBS is composed of a hydrophobic surface spanning five turns of helix 4. All the key side chains from the VBS are buried and contribute to the hydrophobic core of the talin 482–655 fold. We demonstrate that the talin 482–655 five-helix bundle represents an inactive conformation, and mutations that disrupt the hydrophobic core or deletion of helix 5 are required to induce an active conformation in which the VBS is exposed. We also report the crystal structure of the N-terminal vinculin head domain in complex with an activated form of talin. Activation of the VBS in talin and the recruitment of vinculin may support the maturation of small integrin/talin complexes into more stable adhesions.     

The Structure of an Interdomain Complex That Regulates Talin Activity

Talin is a large flexible rod-shaped protein that activates the integrin family of cell adhesion molecules and couples them to cytoskeletal actin. It exists in both globular and extended conformations, and an intramolecular interaction between the N-terminal F3 FERM subdomain and the C-terminal part of the talin rod contributes to an autoinhibited form of the molecule. Here, we report the solution structure of the primary F3 binding domain within the C-terminal region of the talin rod and use intermolecular nuclear Overhauser effects to determine the structure of the complex. The rod domain (residues 1655–1822) is an amphipathic five-helix bundle; Tyr-377 of F3 docks into a hydrophobic pocket at one end of the bundle, whereas a basic loop in F3 (residues 316–326) interacts with a cluster of acidic residues in the middle of helix 4. Mutation of Glu-1770 abolishes binding. The rod domain competes with β3-integrin tails for binding to F3, and the structure of the complex suggests that the rod is also likely to sterically inhibit binding of the FERM domain to the membrane.The cytoskeletal protein talin has emerged as a key player, both in regulating the affinity of the integrin family of cell adhesion molecules for ligand (1) and in coupling integrins to the actin cytoskeleton (2). Thus, depletion of talin results in defects in integrin activation (3), integrin signaling through focal adhesion kinase, the maintenance of cell spreading, and the assembly of focal adhesions in cultured cells (4). In the whole organism, studies on the single talin gene in worms (5) and flies (6) show that talin is essential for a variety of integrin-mediated events that are crucial for normal embryonic development. In vertebrates, there are two talin genes, and mice carrying a talin1 null allele fail to complete gastrulation (7). Tissue-specific inactivation of talin1 results in an inability to activate integrins in platelets (8, 9), defects in the membrane-cytoskeletal interface in megakaryocytes (10), and disruption of the myotendinous junction in skeletal muscle (11). In contrast, mice homozygous for a talin2 gene trap allele have no phenotype, although the allele may be hypomorphic (12).Recent structural studies have provided substantial insights into the molecular basis of talin action. Talin is composed of an N-terminal globular head (∼50 kDa) linked to an extended flexible rod (∼220 kDa). The talin head contains a FERM² domain (made up of F1, F2, and F3 subdomains) preceded by a domain referred to here as F0 (2). Studies by Wegener et al. (30) have shown how the F3 FERM subdomain, which has a phosphotyrosine binding domain fold, interacts with both the canonical NPXY motif and the membrane-proximal helical region of the cytoplasmic tails of integrin β-subunits (13). The latter interaction apparently activates the integrin by disrupting the salt bridge between the integrin α- and β-subunit tails that normally keeps integrins locked in a low affinity state. The observation that the F0 region is also important in integrin activation (14) may be explained by our recent finding that F0 binds, albeit with low affinity, Rap1-GTP,³ a known activator of integrins (15, 16). The talin rod is made up of a series of amphipathic α-helical bundles (17–20) and contains a second integrin binding site (IBS2) (21), numerous binding sites for the cytoskeletal protein vinculin (22), at least two actin binding sites (23), and a C-terminal helix that is required for assembly of talin dimers (20, 24).Both biochemical (25) and cellular studies (16) suggest that the integrin binding sites in full-length talin are masked, and both phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and Rap1 have been implicated in exposing these sites. It is well established that some members of the FERM domain family of proteins are regulated by a head-tail interaction (26); gel filtration, sedimentation velocity, and electron microscopy studies all show that talin is globular in low salt buffers, although it is more elongated (∼60 nm in length) in high salt (27). By contrast, the talin rod liberated from full-length talin by calpain-II cleavage is elongated in both buffers, indicating that the head is required for talin to adopt a more compact state. Direct evidence for an interaction between the talin head and rod has recently emerged from NMR studies by Goksoy et al. (28), who demonstrated binding of ¹⁵N-labeled talin F3 to a talin rod fragment spanning residues 1654–2344, an interaction that was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (K_d = 0.57 μm) (28). Chemical shift data also showed that this segment of the talin rod partially masked the binding site in F3 for the membraneproximal helix of the β3-integrin tail (28), directly implicating the talin head-rod interaction in regulating the integrin binding activity of talin. Goksoy et al. (28) subdivided the F3 binding site in this rod fragment into two sites with higher affinity (K_d ∼3.6 μm; residues 1654–1848) and lower affinity (K_d ∼78 μm; residues 1984–2344). Here, we define the rod domain boundaries and determine the NMR structure of residues 1655–1822, a five-helix bundle. We further show that this domain binds F3 predominantly via surface-exposed residues on helix 4, with an affinity similar to the high affinity site reported by Goksoy et al. (28). We also report the structure of the complex between F3 and the rod domain and show that the latter masks the known binding site in F3 for the β3-integrin tail and is expected to inhibit the association of the talin FERM domain with the membrane.     

On the origins of the weak folding cooperativity of a designed ββα ultrafast protein FSD-1

FSD-1, a designed small ultrafast folder with a ββα fold, has been actively studied in the last few years as a model system for studying protein folding mechanisms and for testing of the accuracy of computational models. The suitability of this protein to describe the folding of naturally occurring α/β proteins has recently been challenged based on the observation that the melting transition is very broad, with ill-resolved baselines. Using molecular dynamics simulations with the AMBER protein force field (ff96) coupled with the implicit solvent model (IGB = 5), we shed new light into the nature of this transition and resolve the experimental controversies. We show that the melting transition corresponds to the melting of the protein as a whole, and not solely to the helix-coil transition. The breadth of the folding transition arises from the spread in the melting temperatures (from ∼325 K to ∼302 K) of the individual transitions: formation of the hydrophobic core, β-hairpin and tertiary fold, with the helix formed earlier. Our simulations initiated from an extended chain accurately predict the native structure, provide a reasonable estimate of the transition barrier height, and explicitly demonstrate the existence of multiple pathways and multiple transition states for folding. Our exhaustive sampling enables us to assess the quality of the Amber ff96/igb5 combination and reveals that while this force field can predict the correct native fold, it nonetheless overstabilizes the α-helix portion of the protein (Tm = ∼387K) as well as the denatured structures.     

Structural and dynamic characterization of a vinculin binding site in the talin rod

Talin is a key protein involved in linking integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. The long flexible talin rod domain contains a number of binding sites for vinculin, a cytoskeletal protein important in stabilizing integrin-mediated cell-matrix junctions. Here we report the solution structure of a talin rod polypeptide (residues 1843-1973) which contains a single vinculin binding site (VBS; residues 1944-1969). Like other talin rod polypeptides, it consists of a helical bundle, in this case a four-helix bundle with a right-handed topology. The residues in the VBS important for vinculin binding were identified by studying the binding of a series of VBS-related peptides to the vinculin Vd1 domain. The key binding determinants are buried in the interior of the helical bundle, suggesting that a substantial structural change in the talin polypeptide is required for vinculin binding. Direct evidence for this was obtained by NMR and EPR spectroscopy. [1H,15N]-HSQC spectra of the talin fragment indicate that vinculin binding caused approximately two-thirds of the protein to adopt a flexible random coil. For EPR spectroscopy, nitroxide spin labels were attached to the talin polypeptide via appropriately located cysteine residues. Measurements of inter-nitroxide distances in doubly spin-labeled protein showed clearly that the helical bundle is disrupted and the mobility of the helices, except for the VBS helix, is markedly increased. Binding of vinculin to talin is thus a clear example of the unusual phenomenon of protein unfolding being required for protein/protein interaction.     

Structural and biophysical properties of the integrin-associated cytoskeletal protein talin

Talin is a large cytoskeletal protein (2541 amino acid residues) which plays a key role in integrin-mediated events that are crucial for cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and survival. This review summarises recent work on the structure of talin and on some of the structurally better defined interactions with other proteins. The N-terminal talin head (approx. 50 kDa) consists of an atypical FERM domain linked to a long flexible rod (approx. 220 kDa) made up of a series of amphipathic helical bundle domains. The F3 FERM subdomain in the head binds the cytoplasmic tail of integrins, but this interaction can be inhibited by an interaction of F3 with a helical bundle in the talin rod, the so-called “autoinhibited form” of the molecule. The talin rod contains a second integrin-binding site, at least two actin-binding sites and a large number of binding sites for vinculin, which is important in reinforcing the initial integrin–actin link mediated by talin. The vinculin binding sites are defined by hydrophobic residues buried within helical bundles, and these must unfold to allow vinculin binding. Recent experiments suggest that this unfolding may be mediated by mechanical force exerted on the talin molecule by actomyosin contraction.     

�� Integrin Tyrosine Phosphorylation Is a Conserved Mechanism for Regulating Talin-induced Integrin Activation

Integrins are large membrane-spanning receptors fundamental to cell adhesion and migration. Integrin adhesiveness for the extracellular matrix is activated by the cytoskeletal protein talin via direct binding of its phosphotyrosine-binding-like F3 domain to the cytoplasmic tail of the β integrin subunit. The phosphotyrosine-binding domain of the signaling protein Dok1, on the other hand, has an inactivating effect on integrins, a phenomenon that is modulated by integrin tyrosine phosphorylation. Using full-length tyrosine-phosphorylated ¹⁵N-labeled β3, β1A, and β7 integrin tails and an NMR-based protein-protein interaction assay, we show that talin1 binds to the NPXY motif and the membrane-proximal portion of β3, β1A, and β7 tails, and that the affinity of this interaction is decreased by integrin tyrosine phosphorylation. Dok1 only interacts weakly with unphosphorylated tails, but its affinity is greatly increased by integrin tyrosine phosphorylation. The Dok1 interaction remains restricted to the integrin NPXY region, thus phosphorylation inhibits integrin activation by increasing the affinity of β integrin tails for a talin competitor that does not form activating membrane-proximal interactions with the integrin. Key residues governing these specificities were identified by detailed structural analysis, and talin1 was engineered to bind preferentially to phosphorylated integrins by introducing the mutation D372R. As predicted, this mutation affects talin1 localization in live cells in an integrin phosphorylation-specific manner. Together, these results indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation is a common mechanism for regulating integrin activation, despite subtle differences in how these integrins interact with their binding proteins.     

Intrinsic α‐helical and β‐sheet conformational preferences: A computational case study of alanine

A fundamental question in protein science is what is the intrinsic propensity for an amino acid to be in an α-helix, β-sheet, or other backbone dihedral angle (-ψ) conformation. This question has been hotly debated for many years because including all protein crystal structures from the protein database, increases the probabilities for α-helical structures, while experiments on small peptides observe that β-sheet-like conformations predominate. We perform molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a hard-sphere model for Ala dipeptide mimetics that includes steric interactions between nonbonded atoms and bond length and angle constraints with the goal of evaluating the role of steric interactions in determining protein backbone conformational preferences. We find four key results. For the hard-sphere MD simulations, we show that (1) β-sheet structures are roughly three and half times more probable than α-helical structures, (2) transitions between α-helix and β-sheet structures only occur when the backbone bond angle τ (N–C_α–C) is greater than 110°, and (3) the probability distribution of τ for Ala conformations in the “bridge” region of-ψ space is shifted to larger angles compared to other regions. In contrast, (4) the distributions obtained from Amber and CHARMM MD simulations in the bridge regions are broader and have increased τ compared to those for hard sphere simulations and from high-resolution protein crystal structures. Our results emphasize the importance of hard-sphere interactions and local stereochemical constraints that yield strong correlations between -ψ conformations and τ.     

How force might activate talin's vinculin binding sites: SMD reveals a structural mechanism

Upon cell adhesion, talin physically couples the cytoskeleton via integrins to the extracellular matrix, and subsequent vinculin recruitment is enhanced by locally applied tensile force. Since the vinculin binding (VB) sites are buried in the talin rod under equilibrium conditions, the structural mechanism of how vinculin binding to talin is force-activated remains unknown. Taken together with experimental data, a biphasic vinculin binding model, as derived from steered molecular dynamics, provides high resolution structural insights how tensile mechanical force applied to the talin rod fragment (residues 486–889 constituting helices H1–H12) might activate the VB sites. Fragmentation of the rod into three helix subbundles is prerequisite to the sequential exposure of VB helices to water. Finally, unfolding of a VB helix into a completely stretched polypeptide might inhibit further binding of vinculin. The first events in fracturing the H1–H12 rods of talin1 and talin2 in subbundles are similar. The proposed force-activated α-helix swapping mechanism by which vinculin binding sites in talin rods are exposed works distinctly different from that of other force-activated bonds, including catch bonds.     

From Discrete to Continuum Models of Three-Dimensional Deformations in Epithelial Sheets

Metamorphic proteins, including proteins with high levels of sequence identity but different folds, are exceptions to the long-standing rule-of-thumb that proteins with as little as 30% sequence identity adopt the same fold. Which topologies can be bridged by these highly identical sequences remains an open question. Here we bridge two 3-α-helix bundle proteins with two radically different folds. Using a straightforward approach, we engineered the sequences of one subdomain within maltose binding protein (MBP, α/β/α-sandwich) and another within outer surface protein A (OspA, β-sheet) to have high sequence identity (80 and 77%, respectively) with engineered variants of protein G (G_A, 3-α-helix bundle). Circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of all engineered variants demonstrate that they maintain their native conformations despite substantial sequence modification. Furthermore, the MBP variant (80% identical to G_A) remained active. Thermodynamic analysis of numerous G_A and MBP variants suggests that the key to our approach involved stabilizing the modified MBP and OspA subdomains via external interactions with neighboring substructures, indicating that subdomain interactions can stabilize alternative folds over a broad range of sequence variation. These findings suggest that it is possible to bridge one fold with many other topologies, which has implications for protein folding, evolution, and misfolding diseases.     

Molecular basis of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate and ARF1 GTPase recognition by the FAPP1 pleckstrin homology (PH) domain

Four-phosphate-adaptor protein 1 (FAPP1) regulates secretory transport from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to the plasma membrane. FAPP1 is recruited to the Golgi through binding of its pleckstrin homology (PH) domain to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P) and a small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1). Despite the critical role of FAPP1 in membrane trafficking, the molecular basis of its dual function remains unclear. Here, we report a 1.9 Å resolution crystal structure of the FAPP1 PH domain and detail the molecular mechanisms of the PtdIns(4)P and ARF1 recognition. The FAPP1 PH domain folds into a seven-stranded β-barrel capped by an α-helix at one edge, whereas the opposite edge is flanked by three loops and the β4 and β7 strands that form a lipid-binding pocket within the β-barrel. The ARF1-binding site is located on the outer side of the β-barrel as determined by NMR resonance perturbation analysis, mutagenesis, and measurements of binding affinities. The two binding sites have little overlap, allowing FAPP1 PH to associate with both ligands simultaneously and independently. Binding to PtdIns(4)P is enhanced in an acidic environment and is required for membrane penetration and tubulation activity of FAPP1, whereas the GTP-bound conformation of the GTPase is necessary for the interaction with ARF1. Together, these findings provide structural and biochemical insight into the multivalent membrane anchoring by the PH domain that may augment affinity and selectivity of FAPP1 toward the TGN membranes enriched in both PtdIns(4)P and GTP-bound ARF1.     

Conformational Changes in Talin on Binding to Anionic Phospholipid Membranes Facilitate Signaling by Integrin Transmembrane Helices

Integrins are heterodimeric (αβ) cell surface receptors that are activated to a high affinity state by the formation of a complex involving the α/β integrin transmembrane helix dimer, the head domain of talin (a cytoplasmic protein that links integrins to actin), and the membrane. The talin head domain contains four sub-domains (F0, F1, F2 and F3) with a long cationic loop inserted in the F1 domain. Here, we model the binding and interactions of the complete talin head domain with a phospholipid bilayer, using multiscale molecular dynamics simulations. The role of the inserted F1 loop, which is missing from the crystal structure of the talin head, PDB:3IVF, is explored. The results show that the talin head domain binds to the membrane predominantly via cationic regions on the F2 and F3 subdomains and the F1 loop. Upon binding, the intact talin head adopts a novel V-shaped conformation which optimizes its interactions with the membrane. Simulations of the complex of talin with the integrin α/β TM helix dimer in a membrane, show how this complex promotes a rearrangement, and eventual dissociation of, the integrin α and β transmembrane helices. A model for the talin-mediated integrin activation is proposed which describes how the mutual interplay of interactions between transmembrane helices, the cytoplasmic talin protein, and the lipid bilayer promotes integrin inside-out activation.     

The α-Helix 4 Residue, Asn135, Is Involved in the Oligomerization of Cry1Ac1 and Cry1Ab5 Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins

The insecticidal Cry toxins produced by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis are comprised of three structural domains. Domain I, a seven-helix bundle, is thought to penetrate the insect epithelial cell plasma membrane through a hairpin composed of α-helices 4 and 5, followed by the oligomerization of four hairpin monomers. The α-helix 4 has been proposed to line the lumen of the pore, whereas some residues in α-helix 5 have been shown to be responsible for oligomerization. Mutation of the Cry1Ac1 α-helix 4 amino acid Asn135 to Gln resulted in the loss of toxicity to Manduca sexta, yet binding was still observed. In this study, the equivalent mutation was made in the Cry1Ab5 toxin, and the properties of both wild-type and mutant toxin counterparts were analyzed. Both mutants appeared to bind to M. sexta membrane vesicles, but they were not able to form pores. The ability of both N135Q mutants to oligomerize was also disrupted, providing the first evidence that a residue in α-helix 4 can contribute to toxin oligomerization.     

RIAM Activates Integrins by Linking Talin to Ras GTPase Membrane-targeting Sequences

Rap1 small GTPases interact with Rap1-GTP-interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM), a member of the MRL (Mig-10/RIAM/Lamellipodin) protein family, to promote talin-dependent integrin activation. Here, we show that MRL proteins function as scaffolds that connect the membrane targeting sequences in Ras GTPases to talin, thereby recruiting talin to the plasma membrane and activating integrins. The MRL proteins bound directly to talin via short, N-terminal sequences predicted to form amphipathic helices. RIAM-induced integrin activation required both its capacity to bind to Rap1 and to talin. Moreover, we constructed a minimized 50-residue Rap-RIAM module containing the talin binding site of RIAM joined to the membrane-targeting sequence of Rap1A. This minimized Rap-RIAM module was sufficient to target talin to the plasma membrane and to mediate integrin activation, even in the absence of Rap1 activity. We identified a short talin binding sequence in Lamellipodin (Lpd), another MRL protein; talin binding Lpd sequence joined to a Rap1 membrane-targeting sequence is sufficient to recruit talin and activate integrins. These data establish the mechanism whereby MRL proteins interact with both talin and Ras GTPases to activate integrins.Increased affinity (“activation”) of cellular integrins is central to physiological events such as cell migration, assembly of the extracellular matrix, the immune response, and hemostasis (1). Each integrin comprises a type I transmembrane α and β subunit, each of which has a large extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain (tail). Talin binds to most integrin β cytoplasmic domains and the binding of talin to the integrin β tail initiates integrin activation (2–4). A small, PTB-like domain of talin mediates activation via a two-site interaction with integrin β tails (5), and this PTB domain is functionally masked in the intact talin molecule (6). A central question in integrin biology is how the talin-integrin interaction is regulated to control integrin activation; recent work has implicated Ras GTPases as critical signaling modules in this process (7).Ras proteins are small monomeric GTPases that cycle between the GTP-bound active form and the GDP-bound inactive form. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote Ras activity by exchanging bound GDP for GTP, whereas GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs)³ enhance the hydrolysis of Ras-bound GTP to GDP (for review, see Ref. 8). The Ras subfamily members Rap1A and Rap1B stimulate integrin activation (9, 10). For example, expression of constitutively active Rap1 activates integrin αMβ2 in macrophage, and inhibition of Rap1 abrogated integrin activation induced by inflammatory agonists (11–13). Murine T-cells expressing constitutively active Rap1 manifest enhanced integrin dependent cell adhesion (14). In platelets, Rap1 is rapidly activated by platelet agonists (15, 16). A knock-out of Rap1B (17) or of the Rap1GEF, RasGRP2 (18), resulted in impairment of αIIbβ3-dependent platelet aggregation, highlighting the importance of Rap1 in platelet aggregation in vivo. Thus, Rap1 GTPases play important roles in the activation of several integrins in multiple biological contexts.Several Rap1 effectors have been implicated in integrin activation (19–21). Rap1-GTP-interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM) is a Rap1 effector that is a member of the MRL (Mig-10/RIAM/Lamellipodin) family of adaptor proteins (20). RIAM contains Ras association (RA) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and proline-rich regions, which are defining features of the MRL protein family. In Jurkat cells, RIAM overexpression induces β1 and β2 integrin-mediated cell adhesion, and RIAM knockdown abolishes Rap1-dependent cell adhesion (20), indicating RIAM is a downstream regulator of Rap1-dependent signaling. RIAM regulates actin dynamics as RIAM expression induces cell spreading; conversely, its depletion reduces cellular F-actin content (20). Whereas RIAM is greatly enriched in hematopoietic cells, Lamellipodin (Lpd) is a paralogue present in fibroblasts and other somatic cells (22).Recently we used forward, reverse, and synthetic genetics to engineer and order an integrin activation pathway in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing a prototype activable integrin, platelet αIIbβ3. We found that Rap1 induced formation of an “integrin activation complex” containing RIAM and talin (23). Here, we have established the mechanism whereby Ras GTPases cooperate with MRL family proteins, RIAM and Lpd, to regulate integrin activation. We find that MRL proteins function as scaffolds that connect the membrane targeting sequences in Ras GTPases to talin, thereby recruiting talin to integrins at the plasma membrane.     

Kindlin-1 and -2 Directly Bind the C-terminal Region of �� Integrin Cytoplasmic Tails and Exert Integrin-specific Activation Effects

Integrin activation, the rapid conversion of integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity, occurs in response to intracellular signals that act on the short cytoplasmic tails of integrin β subunits. Talin binding to integrin β tails provides one key activation signal, but additional factors are likely to cooperate with talin to regulate integrin activation. The integrin β tail-binding proteins kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 were recently identified as integrin co-activators. Here we report an analysis of kindlin-1 and kindlin-2 interactions with β1 and β3 integrin tails and describe the effect of kindlin expression on integrin activation. We demonstrate a direct interaction of kindlin-1 and -2 with recombinant integrin β tails in pulldown binding assays. Our mutational analysis shows that the second conserved NXXY motif (Tyr⁷⁹⁵), a preceding threonine-containing region (Thr⁷⁸⁸ and Thr⁷⁸⁹) of the integrin β1A tail, and a conserved tryptophan in the F3 subdomain of the kindlin FERM domain (kindlin-1 Trp⁶¹² and kindlin-2 Trp⁶¹⁵) are required for direct kindlin-integrin interactions. Similar interactions were observed for integrin β3 tails. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting we further show that transient expression of kindlin-1 or -2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells inhibits the activation of endogenous α5β1 or stably expressed αIIbβ3 integrins. This inhibition is not dependent on direct kindlin-integrin interactions because mutant kindlins exhibiting impaired integrin binding activity effectively inhibit integrin activation. Consistent with previous reports, we find that when co-expressed with the talin head, kindlin-1 or -2 can activate αIIbβ3. This effect is dependent on an intact integrin-binding site in kindlin. Notably however, even when co-expressed with activating levels of talin head, neither kindlin-1 or -2 can cooperate with talin to activate β1 integrins; instead they strongly inhibit talin-mediated activation. We suggest that kindlins are adaptor proteins that regulate integrin activation, that kindlin expression levels determine their effects, and that kindlins may exert integrin-specific effects.Integrins are a family of αβ heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix, cell surface, or soluble protein ligands and modulate a variety of intracellular signaling cascades. A key feature of integrins is their ability to dynamically regulate their affinity for extracellular ligands. In a tightly regulated process generally termed integrin activation, intracellular signals that impinge upon the β subunit cytoplasmic tail induce conformational rearrangements in the integrin extracellular domains, increasing the binding affinity for extracellular ligands (1-3). Ligand-bound integrins then recruit additional signaling, adaptor, and cytoskeletal proteins to the integrin cytoplasmic domains, providing mechanical connections to the actin cytoskeleton and a link to a variety of signal transduction pathways (2-8).Recent years have seen significant advances in our understanding of integrin activation. Notable among these is the identification of the actin- and integrin-binding protein talin as a key integrin activator (1, 9). The 50-kDa talin head contains the principal integrin-binding site, and expression of the talin head is sufficient to activate β1 and β3 integrins (10, 11). The talin head contains a FERM (four point one ezrin radixin moesin) domain. FERM domains consist of trefoil arrangement of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). The phosphotyrosine-binding domain-like F3 subdomain of the talin FERM directly binds a conserved NP(I/L)Y motif in integrin β tails, and this interaction is necessary for integrin activation in vitro and in vivo (10, 12-19). However, although abundant evidence supports the importance of talin binding to integrin β tails during integrin activation, differences in sensitivity of integrins to talin activation and submaximal activation by overexpressed talin suggested that other activating factors may cooperate with talin (10, 20). In an attempt to identify and characterize potential co-activators, we investigated the kindlin family of FERM domain-containing proteins.Kindlin family proteins (21) were first characterized in nematodes where the sole Caenorhabditis elegans kindlin, UNC-112, was identified in an embryonic screen for defective motility and shown to be essential for the assembly of proper cell-matrix adhesion structures, where it normally co-localized with β integrin (22-24). UNC-112 is conserved across many species, because the nematode, fly, and human homologs are ∼60% similar (∼41% identical) over their entire length (24). Humans express three known homologs of UNC-112: kindlin-1 (Kindlerin, URP1, and FERMT1), kindlin-2 (Mig2 and mig-2), and kindlin-3 (Mig2B and URP2) (25-27). Kindlin-1 and -2 are most closely related, sharing 60% identity and 74% similarity, whereas kindlin-3 shares 53% identity and 69% similarity to kindlin-1 and 49% identity and 67% similarity to kindlin-2 (28). The kindlin proteins all contain a predicted Pleckstrin homology domain and a FERM domain that is most closely related to the talin FERM domain, particularly within the integrin-binding F3 subdomain (29). Based on this sequence similarity we proposed that kindlin FERM domains may directly bind integrin β tails, and we previously showed that kindlin-1 could be pulled down from cell lysates using recombinant integrin β1 and β3 tails and that kindlin-1 co-localized with integrins in focal adhesions (29). A similar localization was reported for kindlin-2 (26, 30), and recent reports provided clear evidence implicating kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 in regulation of integrin activation (31-33). Here, we have used integrin pulldown assays to demonstrate direct binding of full-length kindlin-1 to the cytoplasmic tails of β1A and β3 integrins and to identify key binding residues within the integrin tails and the kindlin F3 subdomain. We confirm that these interactions are important for recruiting kindlin-1 to focal adhesions and show that, contrary to expectations, overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 inhibit β1 and β3 integrin activation. Overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 can, however, cooperate with expressed talin head to activate β3 but not β1 integrins. We therefore provide the first data suggesting that kindlin-1 and -2 effects on integrin activation may show β subunit specificity.     

Remodeling of Lipid Vesicles into Cylindrical Micelles by α-Synuclein in an Extended α-Helical Conformation

α-Synuclein (αS) is a protein with multiple conformations and interactions. Natively unfolded in solution, αS accumulates as amyloid in neurological tissue in Parkinson disease and interacts with membranes under both physiological and pathological conditions. Here, we used cryoelectron microscopy in conjunction with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and other techniques to characterize the ability of αS to remodel vesicles. At molar ratios of 1:5 to 1:40 for protein/lipid (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol), large spherical vesicles are converted into cylindrical micelles ∼50 Å in diameter. Other lipids of the same charge (negative) exhibit generally similar behavior, although bilayer tubes of 150–500 Å in width are also produced, depending on the lipid acyl chains. At higher protein/lipid ratios, discoid particles, 70–100 Å across, are formed. EPR data show that, on cylindrical micelles, αS adopts an extended amphipathic α-helical conformation, with its long axis aligned with the tube axis. The observed geometrical relationship between αS and the micelle suggests that the wedging of its long α-helix into the outer leaflet of a membrane may cause curvature and an anisotropic partition of lipids, leading to tube formation.     

The Torque of Rotary F-ATPase Can Unfold Subunit Gamma If Rotor and Stator Are Cross-Linked

During ATP hydrolysis by F₁-ATPase subunit γ rotates in a hydrophobic bearing, formed by the N-terminal ends of the stator subunits (αβ)₃. If the penultimate residue at the α-helical C-terminal end of subunit γ is artificially cross-linked (via an engineered disulfide bridge) with the bearing, the rotary function of F₁ persists. This observation has been tentatively interpreted by the unfolding of the α-helix and swiveling rotation in some dihedral angles between lower residues. Here, we screened the domain between rotor and bearing where an artificial disulfide bridge did not impair the rotary ATPase activity. We newly engineered three mutants with double cysteines farther away from the C-terminus of subunit γ, while the results of three further mutants were published before. We found ATPase and rotary activity for mutants with cross-links in the single α-helical, C-terminal portion of subunit γ (from γ285 to γ276 in E. coli), and virtually no activity when the cross-link was placed farther down, where the C-terminal α-helix meets its N-terminal counterpart to form a supposedly stable coiled coil. In conclusion, only the C-terminal singular α-helix is prone to unwinding and can form a swivel joint, whereas the coiled coil portion seems to resist the enzyme''s torque.