Efficient reconstitution of functional Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits from a complete set of recombinant small subunit ribosomal proteins.

Previous studies have shown that the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli can be reconstituted in vitro from individually purified ribosomal proteins and 16S ribosomal RNA, which were isolated from natural 30S subunits. We have developed a 30S subunit reconstitution system that uses only recombinant ribosomal protein components. The genes encoding E. coli ribosomal proteins S2-S21 were cloned, and all twenty of the individual proteins were overexpressed and purified. Reconstitution, following standard procedures, using the complete set of recombinant proteins and purified 16S ribosomal RNA is highly inefficient. Efficient reconstitution of 30S subunits using these components requires sequential addition of proteins, following either the 30S subunit assembly map (Mizushima & Nomura, 1970, Nature 226:1214-1218; Held et al., 1974, J Biol Chem 249:3103-3111) or following the order of protein assembly predicted from in vitro assembly kinetics (Powers et al., 1993, J MoI Biol 232:362-374). In the first procedure, the proteins were divided into three groups, Group I (S4, S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20), Group II (S5, S6, S9, Sll, S12, S13, S16, S18, and S19), and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21), which were sequentially added to 16S rRNA with a 20 min incubation at 42 degrees C following the addition of each group. In the second procedure, the proteins were divided into Group I (S4, S6, S11, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S20), Group II (S7, S8, S9, S13, and S19), Group II' (S5 and S12) and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21). Similarly efficient reconstitution is observed whether the proteins are grouped according to the assembly map or according to the results of in vitro 30S subunit assembly kinetics. Although reconstitution of 30S subunits using the recombinant proteins is slightly less efficient than reconstitution using a mixture of total proteins isolated from 30S subunits, it is much more efficient than reconstitution using proteins that were individually isolated from ribosomes. Particles reconstituted from the recombinant proteins sediment at 30S in sucrose gradients, bind tRNA in a template-dependent manner, and associate with 50S subunits to form 70S ribosomes that are active in poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. Both the protein composition and the dimethyl sulfate modification pattern of 16S ribosomal RNA are similar for 30S subunits reconstituted with either recombinant proteins or proteins isolated as a mixture from ribosomal subunits as well as for natural 30S subunits.     

Identification of the amino acid residues of proteins S5 and S8 adjacent to each other in the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli.

When Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal subunits are reacted with protein-protein bifunctional reagents, a number of protein pairs as well as aggregates containing three or more ribosomal proteins are formed. In the present study we have purified one of the protein pairs obtained by reaction of 30 S ribosomal subunits with either radioactive or nonradioactive dimethylsuberimidate. Following molecular weight determination and ammonolysis, the pair was shown to consist of ribosomal proteins S5 and S8. The "native" structure of the complex was surmised from its capacity to be reconstituted into a biologically active 30 S ribosomal subunit. From peptide maps and primary structure determination of various peptides it was demonstrated that the cross-linking bond between ribosomal proteins S5 and S8 involves primarily the residues Lys-93 of protein S8 and the COOH-terminal lysine (Lys-166) of ribosomal protein S5. This result is substantiated by the finding that a mutant carrying an altered S5 lacking the COOH-terminal lysine yields a greatly reduced amount of S5-S8 cross-link. In addition to the points of cross-linking it was found that Lys-30, Lys-68, and Lys-86 of S8 and Lys-5 of S5 react with dimethylsuberimidate, indicating that these residues are available for reaction and suggesting their topographical localization on the ribosomal surface.     

Study of the surface of Escherichia coli ribosomes and ribosomal particles by the tritium bombardment method

A new technique of atomic tritium bombardment has been used to study the surface topography of Escherichia coli ribosomes and ribosomal subunits. The technique provides for the labeling of proteins exposed on the surface of ribosomal particles, the extent of protein labeling being proportional to the degree of exposure. The following proteins were considerably tritiated in the 70S ribosomes: S1, S4, S7, S9 and/or S11, S12 and/or L20, S13, S18, S20, S21, L1, L5, L6, L7/L12, L10, L11, L16, L17, L24, L26 and L27. A conclusion is drawn that these proteins are exposed on the ribosome surface to an essentially greater extent than the others. Dissociation of 70S ribosomes into the ribosomal subunits by decreasing Mg2+ concentration does not lead to the exposure of additional ribosomal proteins. This implies that there are no proteins on the contacting surfaces of the subunits. However, if a mixture of subunits has been subjected to centrifugation in a low Mg2+ concentration at high concentrations of a monovalent cation, proteins S3, S5, S7, S14, S18 and L16 are more exposed on the surface of the isolated 30S and 50S subunits than in the subunit mixture or in the 70S ribosomes. The exposure of additional proteins is explained by distortion of the native quaternary structure of ribosomal subunits as a result of the separation procedure. Reassociation of isolated subunits at high Mg2+ concentration results in shielding of proteins S3, S5, S7 and S18 and can be explained by reconstitution of the intact 30S subunit structure.     

Co-operative response of oligomeric protein receptors coupled to non-co-operative ligand binding.

The biogenesis of 30 S and 50 S ribosomal subunits in exponentially growing Escherichia coli has been studied by following the rate of appearance of pulse-labelled ribosomal proteins on mature subunits. Cells were pulse-labelled for two minutes and for three and a half minutes with radioactive leucine. Ribosomal proteins were extracted and purified by chromatography on carboxymethyl cellulose and analysed by bidimensional gel electrophoresis. All 30 S proteins and most of the 50 S proteins were thus prepared and their radioactivity counted: unequal labelling was obtained. 30 S and 50 S proteins were ordered according to increasing specific radioactivity at both time pulses. The incorporation was greater at three and a half minutes than at two minutes. No major difference in the order at the two labelling times was observed.Only two classes of proteins can be defined in the 30 S and the 50 S subunits, namely early and late proteins. In each class a gradual increase in the radioactivity is apparent from the poorly labelled to the highly labelled proteins. This suggests a definite order of addition.Early 30 S proteins: S17, S16, S15, S19, S18, S8, S4, S20, S10, S6, S9, S12, S7.Late 30 S proteins: S5, S3, S2, S14, S11, S13, S1, S21.Early 50 S proteins: L22, L20, L21, L4, L13, L16, L3, L23, L18, L24, L28, L17, L19, L29, L32, L5, L15, L2, L30, L27.Late 50 S proteins: L25, L11, L7, L12, L1, L9, L8, L10, L33, L14, L6.This order is discussed taking into account the pool size of the proteins measured in the same conditions of cell culture.     

Assembly of the central domain of the 30S ribosomal subunit: roles for the primary binding ribosomal proteins S15 and S8

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit occurs in a highly ordered and sequential manner. The ordered addition of ribosomal proteins to the growing ribonucleoprotein particle is initiated by the association of primary binding proteins. These proteins bind specifically and independently to 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Two primary binding proteins, S8 and S15, interact exclusively with the central domain of 16S rRNA. Binding of S15 to the central domain results in a conformational change in the RNA and is followed by the ordered assembly of the S6/S18 dimer, S11 and finally S21 to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In contrast, S8 is not part of this major platform assembly branch. Of the remaining central domain binding proteins, only S21 association is slightly dependent on S8. Thus, although S8 is a primary binding protein that extensively contacts the central domain, its role in assembly of this domain remains unclear. Here, we used directed hydroxyl radical probing from four unique positions on S15 to assess organization of the central domain of 16S rRNA as a consequence of S8 association. Hydroxyl radical probing of Fe(II)-S15/16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S15/S8/16S rRNA ribonucleoprotein particles reveal changes in the 16S rRNA environment of S15 upon addition of S8. These changes occur predominantly in helices 24 and 26 near previously identified S8 binding sites. These S8-dependent conformational changes are consistent with 16S rRNA folding in complete 30S subunits. Thus, while S8 binding is not absolutely required for assembly of the platform, it appears to affect significantly the 16S rRNA environment of S15 by influencing central domain organization.     

The central pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA is needed for ribosome stability but is not essential for 30S initiation complex formation.

To examine the function of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA, we have studied Escherichia coli 30S subunits with the A18 mutation in this structure element. Previously, this mutation, which changes the central base pair of helix 2, C18--G917, to an A18xG917 mismatch, was shown to inhibit translation in vivo and a defect in initiation was suggested. Here, we find that the mutant 30S particles are impaired in forming 70S tight couples and predominantly accumulate as free 30S subunits. Formation of a 30S initiation complex, as measured by toeprinting, was almost as efficient for mutant 30S subunits, derived from the tight couple fraction, as for the wild-type control. However, the A18 mutation has a profound effect on the overall stability of the subunit. The mutant ribosomes were inactivated by affinity chromatography and high salt treatment, due to easy loss of ribosomal proteins. Accordingly, the particles could be reactivated by partial in vitro reconstitution with 30S ribosomal proteins. Mutant 30S subunits from the free subunit fraction were already inactive upon isolation, but could also be reactivated by reconstitution. Apparently, the inactivity in initiation of these mutant 30S subunits is, at least in part, also due to the lack of essential ribosomal proteins. We conclude that disruption of helix 2 of the central pseudoknot by itself does not affect the formation of a 30S initiation complex. We suggest that the in vivo translational defect of the mutant ribosomes is caused by their inability to form 70S initiation complexes.     

Preparative ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography of bacterial ribosomal proteins

We have developed analytical and preparative ion-exchange HPLC methods for the separation of bacterial ribosomal proteins. Proteins separated by the TSK SP-5-PW column were identified with reverse-phase HPLC and gel electrophoresis. The 21 proteins of the small ribosomal subunit were resolved into 18 peaks, and the 32 large ribosomal subunit proteins produced 25 distinct peaks. All peaks containing more than one protein were resolved using reverse-phase HPLC. Peak volumes were typically a few milliliters. Separation times were 90 min for analytical and 5 h for preparative columns. Preparative-scale sample loads ranged from 100 to 400 mg. Overall recovery efficiency for 30S and 50S subunit proteins was approximately 100%. 30S ribosomal subunit proteins purified by this method were shown to be fully capable of participating in vitro reassembly to form intact, active ribosomal subunits.     

Topography of Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins. The order of reactivity of thiol groups

1. 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits of Escherichia coli were treated with N-[2,3-(14)C]-ethylmaleimide and iodo[(14)C]acetamide. 2. The proteins in the native subunits which reacted with the reagents were S1,double dagger S2, S12, S13, S18, S21, L2, L5, L6, L10, L11, L15, L17, L20, L26+28 and L27. 3. Several proteins, such as S1, S12, S14, S18, L2, L6, L10, L11 and either L26 or 28, had thiol groups in an oxidized form and reacted to a greater extent after reduction with beta-mercaptoethanol or dithiothreitol. 4. The total number of thiol groups in 30S and 50S subunits was determined as 16-17 and 26-27 respectively. The total number of thiol groups in each ribosomal protein was also determined. 5. The reaction of 30S and 50S subunits with iodoacetamide under several different conditions established the order of reactivity of thiol groups.     

Mitochondrial ribosome assembly in Neurospora. Structural analysis of mature and partially assembled ribosomal subunits by equilibrium centrifugation in CsCl gradients

In Neurospora, one protein associated with the mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit (S-5, Mr 52,000) is synthesized intramitochondrially and is assumed to be encoded by mtDNA. When mitochondrial protein synthesis is inhibited, either by chloramphenicol or by mutation, cells accumulate incomplete mitochondrial small subunits (CAP-30S and INC-30S particles) that are deficient in S-5 and several other proteins. To gain additional insight into the role of S-5 in mitochondrial ribosome assembly, the structures of Neurospora mitochondrial ribosomal subunits, CAP-30S particles, and INC-30S particles were analyzed by equilibrium centrifugation in CsCl gradients containing different concentrations of Mg+2. The results show (a) that S-5 is tightly associated with small ribosomal subunits, as judged by the fact that it is among the last proteins to be dissociated in CsCl gradients as the Mg+2 concentration is decreased, and (b) that CAP-30S and INC-30S particles, which are deficient in S-5, contain at most 12 proteins that are bound as tightly as in mature small subunits. The CAP-30S particles isolated from sucrose gradients contain a number of proteins that appear to be loosely bound, as judged by dissociation of these proteins in CsCl gradients under conditions in which they remain associated with mature small subunits. The results suggest that S-5 is required for the stable binding of a subset of small subunit ribosomal proteins.     

Are there proteins between the ribosomal subunits? Hot tritium bombardment experiments

The hot tritium bombardment technique [(1976) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 228, 1237-1238] was used for studying the surface localization of ribosomal proteins on Escherichia coli ribosomes. The degree of tritium labeling of proteins was considered as a measure of their exposure (surface localization). Proteins S1, S4, S7, S9 and/or S11, S12 and/or L20, S13, S18, S20, S21, L5, L6, L7/L12, L10, L11, L16, L17, L24, L26 and L27 were shown to be the most exposed on the ribosome surface. The sets of exposed ribosomal proteins on the surface of 70 S ribosomes, on the one hand, and the surfaces of 50 S and 30 S ribosomal subunits in the dissociated state, on the other, were compared. It was found that the dissociation of ribosomes into subunits did not result in exposure of additional ribosomal proteins. The conclusion was drawn that proteins are absent from the contacting surfaces of the ribosomal subunits.     

Identification of several proteins involved in the messenger RNA binding site of the 30 S ribosome by inactivation with 2-methoxy-5-nitrotropone

Chemical modification of unwashed 30 S ribosomal subunits with 2-methoxy-5-nitrotropone causes a rapid loss of their capacity to bind bacteriophage Qβ RNA. Reconstitution experiments show that ribosomal protein is the functionally inactivated species. When purified unmodified ribosomal proteins were included in a mixture of 16 S ribosomal RNA and total protein derived from 2-methoxy-5-nitrotropone-treated subunits, four proteins (S1, S12, S13 and S21) were found to promote the reconstitution of particles capable of binding natural messenger RNA.     

The small subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Identification of the full complement of ribosomal proteins present

Identification of all the protein components of the small subunit (28 S) of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome has been achieved by carrying out proteolytic digestions of whole 28 S subunits followed by analysis of the resultant peptides by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Peptide sequence information was used to search the human EST data bases and complete coding sequences of the proteins were assembled. The human mitochondrial ribosome has 29 distinct proteins in the small subunit. Fourteen of this group of proteins are homologs of the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal proteins S2, S5, S6, S7, S9, S10, S11, S12, S14, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S21. All of these proteins have homologs in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial ribosomes. Surprisingly, three variants of ribosomal protein S18 are found in the mammalian and D. melanogaster mitochondrial ribosomes while C. elegans has two S18 homologs. The S18 homologs tend to be more closely related to chloroplast S18s than to prokaryotic S18s. No mitochondrial homologs to prokaryotic ribosomal proteins S1, S3, S4, S8, S13, S19, and S20 could be found in the peptides obtained from the whole 28 S subunit digests or by analysis of the available data bases. The remaining 15 proteins present in mammalian mitochondrial 28 S subunits (MRP-S22 through MRP-S36) are specific to mitochondrial ribosomes. Proteins in this group have no apparent homologs in bacterial, chloroplast, archaebacterial, or cytosolic ribosomes. All but two of these proteins have a clear homolog in D. melanogaster while all but three can be found in the genome of C. elegans. Five of the mitochondrial specific ribosomal proteins have homologs in S. cerevisiae.     

The accessibility of antigenic determinants of ribosomal protein s4 in situ

Antibodies to Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 react with S4 in subribosomal particles, eg, the complex of 16S RNA with S4, S7, S8, S15, S16, S17, and S19 and the RI* reconstitution intermediate, but they do not react with intact 30S subunits. Antibodies were isolated by three different methods from antisera obtained during the immunization of eight rabbits. Some of these antibody preparations, which contained contaminant antibodies directed against other ribosomal proteins, reacted with subunits, but this reaction was not affected by removal of the anti-S4 antibody population. Other antibody preparations did not react with subunits. It is concluded that the antigenic determinants of S4 are accessible in some protein deficient subribosomal particles but not in intact 30S subunits.     

Comparative electron microscopic study on the location of ribosomal proteins S3 and S7 on the surface of the E. coli 30S subunit using monoclonal and conventional antibody

Summary Mice were immunised with 30S subunits from E. coli and their spleen cells were fused with myeloma cells. From this fusion two monoclonal antibodies were obtained, one of which was shown to be specific for ribosomal protein S3, the other for ribosomal protein S7. The two monoclonal antibodies formed stable complexes with intact 30S subunits and were therefore used for the three-dimensional localisation of ribosomal proteins S3 and S7 on the surface of the E. coli small subunit by immuno electron microscopy. The antibody binding sites determined with the two monoclonal antibodies were found to lie in the same area as those obtained with conventional antibodies. Both proteins S3 and S7 are located on the head of the 30S subunit, close to the one-third/two-thirds partition. Protein S3 is located just above the small lobe, whereas protein S7 is located on the side of the large lobe.     

Ribosomal protein-dependent orientation of the 16 S rRNA environment of S15

Ribosomal protein S15 binds specifically to the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA (16 S rRNA) and directs the assembly of four additional proteins to this domain. The central domain of 16 S rRNA along with these five proteins form the platform of the 30 S subunit. Previously, directed hydroxyl radical probing from Fe(II)-S15 in small ribonucleoprotein complexes was used to study assembly of the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Here, this same approach was used to understand the 16 S rRNA environment of Fe(II)-S15 in 30 S subunits and to determine the ribosomal proteins that are involved in forming the mature S15-16 S rRNA environment. We have identified additional sites of Fe(II)-S15-directed cleavage in 30S subunits compared to the binary complex of Fe(II)-S15/16 S rRNA. Along with novel targets in the central domain, sites within the 5' and 3' minor domains are also cleaved. This suggests that during the course of 30S subunit assembly these elements are positioned in the vicinity of S15. Besides the previously determined role for S8, roles for S5, S6+S18, and S16 in altering the 16 S rRNA environment of S15 were established. These studies reveal that ribosomal proteins can alter the assembly of regions of the 30 S subunit from a considerable distance and influence the overall conformation of this ribonucleoprotein particle.     

Immunochemical analysis of the structure of eukaryotic ribosomes

Summary Antibodies were prepared in rabbits and sheep to rat liver ribosomes, ribosomal subunits, and to mixtures of proteins from the particles. The antisera were characterized by quantitative immunoprecipitation, by passive hemagglutination, by immunodiffusion on Ouchterlony plates, and by immunoelectrophoresis. While all the antisera contained antibodies specific for ribosomal proteins, none had precipitating antibodies against ribosomal RNA. Rat liver ribosomal proteins were more immunogenic in sheep than rabbits, and the large ribosomal subunit and its proteins were more immunogenic than those of the 40S subparticle. Antisera specific for one or the other ribosomal subunit could be prepared; thus it is unlikely that there are antigenic determinants common to the proteins of the two subunits. When ribosomes, ribosomal subunits, or mixtures of proteins were used as antigens the sera contained antibodies directed against a large number of the ribosomal proteins.Abbreviations TP total proteins—used to designate mixtures of proteins from ribosomal particles, hence TP80 is a mixtures of all the proteins from 80S ribosomes - TP60 the proteins from 60S subunits - TP40 the proteins from 40S particles     

30S ribosomal subunits can be assembled in vivo without primary binding ribosomal protein S15

Assembly of 30S ribosomal subunits from Escherichia coli has been dissected in detail using an in vitro system. Such studies have allowed characterization of the role for ribosomal protein S15 in the hierarchical assembly of 30S subunits; S15 is a primary binding protein that orchestrates the assembly of ribosomal proteins S6, S11, S18, and S21 with the central domain of 16S ribosomal RNA to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In vitro S15 is the sole primary binding protein in this cascade, performing a critical role during assembly of these four proteins. To investigate the role of S15 in vivo, the essential nature of rpsO, the gene encoding S15, was examined. Surprisingly, E. coli with an in-frame deletion of rpsO are viable, although at 37 degrees C this DeltarpsO strain has an exaggerated doubling time compared to its parental strain. In the absence of S15, the remaining four platform proteins are assembled into ribosomes in vivo, and the overall architecture of the 30S subunits formed in the DeltarpsO strain at 37 degrees C is not altered. Nonetheless, 30S subunits lacking S15 appear to be somewhat defective in subunit association in vivo and in vitro. In addition, this strain is cold sensitive, displaying a marked ribosome biogenesis defect at low temperature, suggesting that under nonideal conditions S15 is critical for assembly. The viability of this strain indicates that in vivo functional populations of 70S ribosomes must form in the absence of S15 and that 30S subunit assembly has a plasicity that has not previously been revealed or characterized.     

Functional heterogeneity of the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli. II. Effect of S21 on initiation

Summary Native 30S ribosomal subunits fromEscherichia coli are deficient in fractional protein S21, which is present on the monosome and polysome-derived 30S subunits. The presence of S21 prevents the binding of Fmet-tRNA if and only if 50S subunits are present. In contrast, proteins S2, S3 and S14 stimulate the binding of Fmet-tRNA. These results have been used to rationalize other data concerning the mechanism of Fmet-tRNA binding by ribosomes. In addition, the present data indicate that the 30S ribosomal subunits are heterogeneousin vivo as well asin vitro.Dedicated to Professor H. Veldstra on the occasion of his retirement from the chair of biochemistry of the University of Leiden.     

Both ends ofEscherichia coli ribosomal protein S13 are immunochemically accessiblein situ

To investigate the structure ofEscherichia coli ribosomal protein S13 in 30S ribosomal subunits, we have previously generated 22 S13 specific monoclonal antibodies and mapped their specific epitopes to the S13 sequence. The availability of these S13 epitopesin situ has been further examined by incubating these monoclonal antibodies with 30S ribosomal subunits and analyzing formation of monoclonal antibody-linked ribosome dimers by sucrose gradients centrifugation. We have found that none of the 22 monoclonal antibodies makes ribosome dimers individually as do typical antisera. However, one monoclonal antibody, designated AS13-MAb 2, reacts with 30S ribosomal subunits to form immunocomplexes sedimenting faster than subunit monomers. When AS13-MAb 2 is paired with any one of three monoclonal antibodies directed to the S13 C-terminal epitopes, dimer formation is observed. Other pairs of monoclonal antibodies directed to distinct S13 epitopes have been tested similarly for dimer formation. Monoclonal antibody AS13-MAb 22, directed to the N-terminal region of 22 residues, also causes subunits to form typical dimers, but only if paired with one of the three monoclonal antibodies directed to the S13 C-terminal region. The close proximity of the epitopes recognized by AS13-MAbs 2 and 22 has been established by the mutual competition between the antibodies binding to intact 30S subunits. These results corroborate our previous observation, using polyclonal antibodies, that S13 has more than one epitope exposed on 30S subunits. Our finding that sequences on both ends of the S13 molecule are immunochemically accessible provides information about the molecular organization of S13in situ.     

Both ends of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S13 are immunochemically accessible in situ.

To investigate the structure ofEscherichia coli ribosomal protein S13 in 30S ribosomal subunits, we have previously generated 22 S13 specific monoclonal antibodies and mapped their specific epitopes to the S13 sequence. The availability of these S13 epitopesin situ has been further examined by incubating these monoclonal antibodies with 30S ribosomal subunits and analyzing formation of monoclonal antibody-linked ribosome dimers by sucrose gradients centrifugation. We have found that none of the 22 monoclonal antibodies makes ribosome dimers individually as do typical antisera. However, one monoclonal antibody, designated AS13-MAb 2, reacts with 30S ribosomal subunits to form immunocomplexes sedimenting faster than subunit monomers. When AS13-MAb 2 is paired with any one of three monoclonal antibodies directed to the S13 C-terminal epitopes, dimer formation is observed. Other pairs of monoclonal antibodies directed to distinct S13 epitopes have been tested similarly for dimer formation. Monoclonal antibody AS13-MAb 22, directed to the N-terminal region of 22 residues, also causes subunits to form typical dimers, but only if paired with one of the three monoclonal antibodies directed to the S13 C-terminal region. The close proximity of the epitopes recognized by AS13-MAbs 2 and 22 has been established by the mutual competition between the antibodies binding to intact 30S subunits. These results corroborate our previous observation, using polyclonal antibodies, that S13 has more than one epitope exposed on 30S subunits. Our finding that sequences on both ends of the S13 molecule are immunochemically accessible provides information about the molecular organization of S13in situ.