两栖类早期发育中—内胚层形成和神经板发育之垂直的平面的诱导作用

中－内胚层诱导和神经诱导都需要平面的垂直的诱导相互作用；中胚层诱导开初是一平面诱导过程，继之一个垂直诱导，以实最终的区域分化，而神经诱导则必须有最初垂直相互作用，以实现激发和转化过程，这些垂直的诱导作用，继之以在外胚层内传播的同源诱导作用，决定神经板的形状和大小，以及其区域分化。对于神经板的背面集中和伸长，激发作用和后来的转化作用似乎都是必需的。     

牙齿发育与BMP信号通路的关系

牙齿的发育过程,包括由胚胎早期预定成牙部位到发育形成完整的牙齿,是一个复杂的连续过程,牙齿的发育过程实际上就是牙源性上皮和颅神经嵴来源的牙源性间充质之间的相互作用的结果.骨形态发生蛋白(BMPs)最初被认为是一种具有高效骨诱导性的蛋白,能够诱导未分化的间充质细胞转化形成软骨以及骨组织,之后的研究证明BMPs在胚胎发育过程中起到至关重要的作用.至今为止经过众多科学家的研究,牙齿发育与BMP信号通路的关系已经研究的相当透彻.     

OAZ在果蝇大脑发育中的功能研究

OAZ基因编码在进化上保守的C2H2型O/E相关锌指蛋白,参与基因转录的调控。TGF-β信号传导通路中OAZ通过与SMAD4/R-SMAD结合形成转录复合物发挥作用;Olf1/EBF作为转录因子与OAZ相互作用来调控嗅觉上皮细胞和B淋巴细胞的分化。此外,OAZ是JAK/STAT信号通路的下游候选靶基因。但是迄今为止OAZ在果蝇大脑发育的功能还没有研究。果蝇大脑视叶作为一个相对简易操作的模型为我们揭示早期神经干细胞的增殖和转化机制创造了条件,为加快理解哺乳动物早期神经发生过程以及进一步开展神经干细胞治疗提供可能。本研究通过RNA干扰来研究OAZ在果蝇大脑发育中的作用。我们的初步实验结果表明,OAZ对果蝇大脑视叶神经上皮细胞的维持可能不是必需的,OAZ对果蝇大脑视叶神经板和脑髓神经节的发育也可能不是必需的。     

TGF-β超家族在软骨发生、发育和维持中的作用

转化生长因子b(Transforming growth factor b, TGF-b)超家族包括TGF-b和骨形态发生蛋白(Bone morphogenetic protein,BMP)两个亚家族。TGF-b超家族信号通路的配体、配体拮抗分子、受体、信号转导分子均在软骨内成骨过程中发挥各自独特的作用, 参与调控软骨细胞的谱系分化、增殖、成熟、凋亡和矿化。BMP信号能起始间充质细胞向软骨细胞分化并维持软骨细胞的特性, 在软骨发生过程中起主导作用; 在生长板发育的过程中, BMP信号促进软骨细胞的成熟, 促进成骨, 而TGF-b信号抑制软骨细胞的肥大分化, 维持生长板中适量的软骨细胞; TGF-b信号和BMP信号对于关节软骨的维持和修复都是不可或缺的。因此, TGF-b超家族的重要作用贯穿骨骼发育过程的始终。     

TGF—β超家族在软骨发生、发育和维持中的作用

转化生长因子β(Transforming growth factor β,TGF-β)超家族包括TGF-β和骨形态发生蛋白(Bone morphogenetic protein,BMP)两个亚家族.TGF-β超家族信号通路的配体、配体拮抗分子,受体、信号转导分子均在软骨内成骨过程中发挥各自独特的作用,参与调控软骨细胞的谱系分化、增殖、成熟、凋亡和矿化.BMP信号能起始间充质细胞向软骨细胞分化并维持软骨细胞的特性,在软骨发生过程中起主导作用;在生长板发育的过程中,BMP信号促进软骨细胞的成熟,促进成骨,而TGF-β信号抑制软骨细胞的肥大分化,维持生长板中适量的软骨细胞;TGF-β信号和BMP信号对于关节软骨的维持和修复都是不可或缺的.因此,TGF-β超家族的重要作用贯穿骨骼发育过程的始终.     

肝细胞生长因子促进猕猴胚胎干细胞来源的神经前体细胞的增殖

肝细胞牛长因子(hepatoeyte growth factor,HGF)足一个多效应因子,在神经系统中具有重要作用.早前的研究发现采用HGF和G5 supplement结合EB(embryoid body)法可诱导猕猴胍胎干细胞(rhesus embryonic stem cells,rESCs)定向分化成高纯度的可移植的神经前体细胞(neural progenitors),但对于HGF在整个诱导分化过程中的具体作用及机制还不清楚.本研究改进先前研究体系,采用单层培养法,同时添加HGF和bFGF(basic fibroblast growth factor,碱性成纤维细胞生长因子)诱导rESCs在两周内定向分化为高纯度[(81.66±4.37)%]的神经前体细胞,并且单独添加HGF或bFGF以及两者都没有添加的条件下也得到了相似比例的神经前体细胞,表明外源性的HGF在诱导rESCs向神经前体细胞转变的过程中对十神经细胞命运的决定并不起作用;进一步研究发现HGF能有效地促进神经前体细胞的增殖,并且与bFGF具有协同作用.总之,本研究建立了一种更为简单的诱导rESCs分化成神经细胞的方法,发现外源性的HGF在rESCs向神经前体细胞分化的过程中并没有神经诱导的作用,但能与bFGF协同作用促进rESCs来源的神经前体细胞的增殖.     

Wnt信号转导通路与神经发育研究进展

Wnt蛋白是一类分泌型糖蛋白家族,Wnt信号蛋白与细胞表面的多种受体相互作用,参与诸多生命过程。对神经系统发育的研究表明,Wnt信号通路在神经发生,神经祖细胞增值、分化,神经干细胞的自我更新,轴突导向等过程中起重要调控作用。多项研究已经证实,Wnt通路失调与诸多神经系统疾病有密切关系。Wnt信号通路的突变或异常,将会引起神经系统发育缺陷。然而,对Wnt非经典信号通路的研究,尤其是新受体Ryk的调控作用的认识迄今仍不全面。根据国内外相关研究,阐述了经典Wnt信号通路Wnt/β-catenin途径的同时也对Wnt/Ryk非经典信号途径这一研究新领域做了讨论。在非经典信号通路中,Ryk-ICD的剪接对于前体细胞的神经分化起重要作用。本文分析了Wnt/β-catenin和Wnt/Ryk信号通路在神经发育中的作用,有助于深入理解神经发育过程中Wnt信号通路的作用机制。然而,Ryk-ICD引导因子、分子机制等问题仍待进一步研究,而这将有利于理解神经干细胞分化机理。     

脊椎动物前脑发育的研究进展

胚胎早期神经系统的发生包括两个不可分开的阶段,即活化和转化过程。活化过程开始于原肠胚早期,是神经发生的诱导过程。稍晚的转化阶段发生了神经系统局部结构的形成,即区域化过程。活化的关键是原肠胚中胚层产生诱导性信号分子和外胚层对信号的应答,区域化也是诱导的结果,造成中枢神经系统有各种局部结构,即具有不同细胞谱系和功能的神经元节(neuromere)。     

脊髓源神经干细胞诱导分化为胆碱能神经元过程中Aldoc和Stmn1表达的研究

目的探讨脊髓源神经干细胞在诱导分化为胆碱能神经元过程中Aldoc和Stmn1的表达变化情况。方法从孕17天Wistar胚胎大鼠取出脊髓组织,制成细胞悬液,采用含EGF和bFGF的无血清限定性培养基培养,然后进行诱导分化,观察脊髓源神经干细胞向胆碱能神经元分化的情况,应用荧光定量PCR方法分析Aldoc和Stmn1基因在脊髓源神经干细胞诱导分化为胆碱能神经元的过程中的表达变化情况。结果神经干细胞在诱导分化为胆碱能神经元后,经免疫荧光检测有ChAT阳性细胞表达;Aldoc基因的表达量在胆碱能神经元较神经干细胞低(P<0.05);Stmn1基因的表达量则在诱导分化后较神经干细胞升高(P<0.05)。结论 Aldoc对神经干细胞的干性维持有重要作用,Stmn1在胆碱能神经元的成熟过程中起作用。     

东方蝾螈早期发育过程中细胞核超微结构的观察

东方蝾螈胚胎发育过程中,从原肠早期到原肠末期无论外胚层或中胚层细胞核内都含有大量的异染色质团块,而到神经板形成后所有细胞核内染色质均呈分散状态。异染色质向常染色质的转变过程发生在原肠末期到神经板形成这段时间里,在原口闭合后4.5小时之前完成,此时期似乎是形态发生的转折点。到发育的后期,细胞核内有一些染色质又会由分散状态转变为凝聚的异染色质团块。预定神经上皮向神经组织分化的决定是个逐渐的过程,这一过程在原肠口闭合时已经开始,到神经板期完成。染色质的分散似乎发生在细胞有了初步决定之后。本文就染色质超微结构变化的意义以及染色质超微结构变化与细胞分化的关系等问题进行了讨论。     

Vertical versus planar induction in amphibian early development

In the Urodeles, the archenteron roof invaginates as a single continuous sheet of cells, vertically inducing the neural anlage in the overlying ectoderm during invagination. The induction comprises first the activation process, leading, to forebrain differentiation tendencies, and then the superimposed transformation process, which changes presumptive forebrain development into that of hindbrain and spinal cord acting with a caudally increasing intensity. The activating action, being maximal anteriorly, decreases caudally to nearly zero. In the double-layered Xenopus embryo, the internal mesodermal marginal zone shows much more independent and earlier regional segregation and involution than the external marginal zone in the Urodeles; its prechordal mesoderm already initiating vertical neural induction in overlying ectoderm at stages 10 to 10⁺ before any visible archenteron invagination. In Xenopus incomplete exogastrulae the prechordal mesoderm involutes normally prior to evagination of the endoderm and mesodem. Artificially produced Xenopus total exogastrulae, made at stage 9 before mesoderm involution, behave just like axolotl total exogastrulae, showing no neural differentiation. The notion of planar neural induction in Xenopus can only be applied in exogastrulae and Keller explants for the transforming action, which is maximal in the caudal archenteron roof. In normal Xenopus development, the formation of the entire nervous system is essentially due to vertical induction by the successively involuting prechordal and notochordal mesoderm. The different behavior of Xenopus embryos in comparison with Urodele embryos can essentially be explained by the double-layered character of the animal moiety of the Xenopus embryo.     

Planar signalling is not sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern in pseudoexogastrula explants from Xenopus and Triturus

Early observations on the morphology of total exogastrulae from urodeles (Axolotl) had provided evidence for essential vertical signalling mechanisms in the process of neural induction. Conversely, more recent studies with anurans (Xenopus laevis) making use of molecular markers for neural-specific gene expression appear to support the idea of planar signalling as providing sufficient information for neural differentiation along the anterior-posterior axis. In an attempt to resolve this apparent contradiction, we report on the comparative analysis of morphology and gene expression characteristics with explants prepared from both urodeles (Triturus alpestris) and anurans (Xenopus laevis). For this purpose, we have made use of a refined experimental protocol for the preparation of exogastrulae that is intended to combine the advantages of the Holtfreter type exogastrula and the Keller sandwich techniques, and which we refer to as pseudoexogastrula explants. Analysis of histology and expression of several neural and ectodermal marker genes in such explants suggests that neural differentiation is induced in both species, but only within the intermediate zone between ectoderm and endomesoderm. Therefore, experiments with Xenopus and Triturus explants described in this communication argue against planar signalling events as being sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern.     

Planar and vertical induction of anteroposterior pattern during the development of the amphibian central nervous system

In amphibians and other vertebrates, neural development is induced in the ectoderm by signals coming from the dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation. Classical embryological results indicated that these signals follow a “vertical” path, from the involuted dorsal mesoderm to the overlying ectoderm. Recent work with the frog Xenopus laevis, however, has revealed the existence of “planar” neural-inducing signals, which pass within the continuous sheet or plane of tissue formed by the dorsal mesoderm and presumptive neurectoderm. Much of this work has made use of Keller explants, in which dorsal mesoderm and ectoderm are cultured in a planar configuration with contact along only a single edge, and vertical contact is prevented. Planar signals can induce the full anteroposterior (A-P) extent of neural pattern, as evidenced in Keller explants by the expression of genes that mark specific positions along the A-P axis. In this review, classical and modern molecular work on vertical and planar inductionwill be discussed. This will be followed by a discussion of various models for vertical induction and planar induction. It has been proposed that the A-P pattern in the nervous system is derived from a parallel pattern of inducers in the dorsal mesoderm which is “imprinted” vertically onto the overlying ectoderm. Since it is now known that planar signals can also induce A-P neural pattern, this kind of model must be reassessed. The study of planar induction of A-P pattern in Xenopus embryos provides a simple, manipulable, two-dimensional system in which to investigate pattern formation. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Calcium transients triggered by planar signals induce the expression of ZIC3 gene during neural induction in Xenopus

In intact Xenopus embryos, an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) in the dorsal ectoderm is both necessary and sufficient to commit the ectoderm to a neural fate. However, the relationship between this Ca(2+) increase and the expression of early neural genes is as yet unknown. In intact embryos, studying the interaction between Ca(2+) signaling and gene expression during neural induction is complicated by the fact that the dorsal ectoderm receives both planar and vertical signals from the mesoderm. The experimental system may be simplified by using Keller open-face explants where vertical signals are eliminated, thus allowing the interaction between planar signals, Ca(2+) transients, and neural induction to be explored. We have imaged Ca(2+) dynamics during neural induction in open-face explants by using aequorin. Planar signals generated by the mesoderm induced localized Ca(2+) transients in groups of cells in the ectoderm. These transients resulted from the activation of L-type Ca(2+) channels. The accumulated Ca(2+) pattern correlated with the expression of the early neural precursor gene, Zic3. When the transients were blocked with pharmacological agents, the level of Zic3 expression was dramatically reduced. These data indicate that, in open-face explants, planar signals reproduce Ca(2+) -signaling patterns similar to those observed in the dorsal ectoderm of intact embryos and that the accumulated effect of the localized Ca(2+) transients over time may play a role in controlling the expression pattern of Zic3.     

用PEG法把外源基因导入甘蓝型油菜原生质体再生转基因植株

通过PEG处理把外源基因导入甘蓝型油菜原生质体。转化介质中二价阳离子的种类和浓度、携带DNA及PEG溶液的pH值都会影响基因导入效率。以潮霉素抗性和卡那霉素抗性作标记,均成功地筛选到了抗性愈伤组织。相对转化频率分别为1.3%和0.2%。前者明显高于后者。把抗性愈伤组织转到分化培养基上,分化出芽。诱导生根后移栽到土壤中,生长状况良好。酶活性测定和Southern blotting分析表明外源基因已插入到植物细胞基因组中。该遗传转化系统存在的主要问题是抗性愈伤组织分化频率较低。本文对其原因作了初步分析。     

Planar and vertical signals in the induction and patterning of the Xenopus nervous system.

The cellular mechanisms responsible for the formation of the Xenopus nervous system have been examined in total exogastrula embryos in which the axial mesoderm appears to remain segregated from prospective neural ectoderm and in recombinates of ectoderm and mesoderm. Posterior neural tissue displaying anteroposterior pattern develops in exogastrula ectoderm. This effect may be mediated by planar signals that occur in the absence of underlying mesoderm. The formation of a posterior neural tube may depend on the notoplate, a midline ectodermal cell group which extends along the anteroposterior axis. The induction of neural structures characteristic of the forebrain and of cell types normally found in the ventral region of the posterior neural tube requires additional vertical signals from underlying axial mesoderm. Thus, the formation of the embryonic Xenopus nervous system appears to involve the cooperation of distinct planar and vertical signals derived from midline cell groups.     

Induction and axial patterning of the neural plate: Planar and vertical signals

In this review I summarize recent findings on the contributions of different cell groups to the formation of the basic plan of the nervous system of vertebrate embryos. Midline cells of the mesoderm—the organizer, notochord, and prechordal plate—and midline cells of the neural ectoderm—the notoplate and floor plate—appear to have a fundamental role in the induction and patterning of the neural plate. Vertical signals acting across tissue layers and planar signals acting through the neural epithelium have distinct roles and cooperate in induction and pattern formation. Whereas the prechordal plate and notochord have distinct vertical signaling properties, the initial anteroposterior (A-P) pattern of the neural plate may be induced by planar signals originating from the organizer region. Planar signals from the notoplate may also contribute to the mediolateral (M-L) patterning of the neural plate. These and other findings suggest a general view of neural induction and axial patterning. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Epithelial Cell Wedging and Neural Trough Formation Are Induced Planarly inXenopus,without Persistent Vertical Interactions with Mesoderm

In this study we investigate the induction of the cell behaviors underlying neurulation in the frog,Xenopus laevis.Although planar signals from the organizer can induce convergent extension movements of the posterior neural tissue in explants, the remaining morphogenic processes of neurulation do not appear to occur in absence of vertical interactions with the organizer (R. Kelleret al.,1992,Dev. Dyn.193, 218–234). These processes include: (1) cell elongation perpendicular to the plane of the epithelium, forming the neural plate; (2) cell wedging, which rolls the neural plate into a trough; (3) intercalation of two layers of neural plate cells to form one layer; and (4) fusion of the neural folds. To allow planar signaling between all the inducing tissues of the involuting marginal zone and the responding prospective ectoderm, we have designed a “giant sandwich” explant. In these explants, cell elongation and wedging are induced in the superficial neural layer by planar signals without persistent vertical interactions with underlying, involuted mesoderm. A neural trough forms, and neural folds form and approach one another. However, the neural folds do not fuse with one another, and the deep cells of these explants do not undergo their normal behaviors of elongation, wedging, and intercalation between the superficial neural cells, even when planar signals are supplemented with vertical signaling until the late midgastrula (stage 11.5). Vertical interactions with mesoderm during and beyond the late gastrula stage were required for expression of these deep cell behaviors and for neural fold fusion. These explants offer a way to regulate deep and superficial cell behaviors and thus make possible the analysis of the relative roles of these behaviors in closing the neural tube.     

The neural induction process; its morphogenetic aspects

This posthumous review of early embryonic inductions concludes: 1) the amphibian egg has only two distinct components, animal and vegetal. Interactions at their mutual boundary forms meso-endoderm. This is "meso-endoderm induction", not just "mesoderm induction". 2) The dorso-ventral polarity of the yolk mass implies a dorsally situated inducing centre. 3) Accumulation of cells into one, two, three or many cell masses [problastopores] along the circumference of the meso-endoderm results in as many axes, implying a self-organizing capacity of meso-endoderm. 4) Induction of the meso-endoderm is slow, spreading cell to cell through the animal moiety from the boundary of the vegetal yolk mass towards the animal pole. 5) Interaction between mesoderm and ectoderm is a separate step leading to cranio-caudal differentiation of the archenteron roof. 6) The initial invaginating endoderm and mesoderm, representing the future pharynx endoderm and prechordal plate mesoderm, first contacts the most posterior presumptive neurectoderm after having passed the still uninvaginated trunk mesoderm. At that moment an antero-posterior level neural induction actually starts. 7) The ectoderm contraction wave coincides spatially and temporally with the induced neural plate. 8) Two successive homoiogenetic waves of inductive activity pass through the presumptive neurectoderm in the anterior direction, the first one, "activation", giving rise to neural differentiation and ultimately forebrain, the second one, "transformation", to more caudal CNS structures. These are separate, successive steps in CNS regional induction. 9) The midbrain represents a secondary formation in the neural plate. 10) The observed changes in morphogenesis may depend upon separate, successive binary decisions via [cell and] nuclear state splitters [involving differentiation waves].     

The Role of Competence in the Cranio-Caudal Segregation of the Central Nervous System

Left to right thirds of Triturus presumptive prosencephalon show identical developmental potencies after implantation in a neutral Ambystoma environment. Such equipotential grafts were excised from stages between late-gastrula and mid-neurula and implanted into the neural plate of an Ambystoma host at different cranio-caudal levels. Their regional differentiation was independent of the age of the host, but dependent upon the age of the donor material; the older the latter the smaller the portion of the graft which was transformed into more posterior neural structures. Full transformation occurred in stage 11/12 grafts, while pure prosencephalic differentiation took place in stage 16 grafts, demonstrating that the period of competence of the neurectoderm for transformation extends from stage 11/12 up to stage 16. Irrespective of the level of implantation all grafts older than stage 11/12 and younger than stage 16 showed an uninterrupted cranially-oriented regional differentiation. The medio-lateral extension of the transformation process is primarily determined by the temporal loss of competence of the implanted neurectoderm. A comparison of grafts implanted at different cranio-caudal levels showed that transformation is more pronounced the more caudal the level of implantation, so that another factor(s) than competence must also play a role in the regional segregation of the CNS.