Boning up on ephrin signaling

The activities of osteoclasts, which degrade bone, and osteoblasts, which form bone, are coordinated to maintain bone homeostasis. Zhao et al. (2006) now demonstrate bidirectional signaling between these two cell populations via the transmembrane ligand ephrinB2 expressed by osteoclasts and its receptor EphB4 expressed by osteoblasts. Such bidirectional signaling limits osteoclast activity while stimulating osteoblast differentiation.     

Osteoclast-osteoblast communication

Cells in osteoclast and osteoblast lineages communicate with each other through cell-cell contact, diffusible paracrine factors and cell-bone matrix interaction. Osteoclast-osteoblast communication occurs in a basic multicellular unit (BMU) at the initiation, transition and termination phases of bone remodeling. At the initiation phase, hematopoietic precursors are recruited to the BMU. These precursors express cell surface receptors including c-Fms, RANK and costimulatory molecules, such as osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR), and differentiate into osteoclasts following cell-cell contact with osteoblasts, which express ligands. Subsequently, the transition from bone resorption to formation is mediated by osteoclast-derived ‘coupling factors’, which direct the differentiation and activation of osteoblasts in resorbed lacunae to refill it with new bone. Bidirectional signaling generated by interaction between ephrinB2 on osteoclasts and EphB4 on osteoblast precursors facilitates the transition. Such interaction is likely to occur between osteoclasts and lining cells in the bone remodeling compartment (BRC). At the termination phase, bone remodeling is completed by osteoblastic bone formation and mineralization of bone matrix. Here, we describe molecular communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts at distinct phases of bone remodeling.     

EphB4/ephrinB2逆向信号对RAW264．7破骨细胞分化中PDZ结构域蛋白表达变化的研究

Eph受体是酪氨酸蛋白激酶受体家族中最大的亚家族,ephrin(Eph受体相互作用蛋白)是其配体,它们是膜结合蛋白,相互依赖进行信号转导.内居蛋白(syntenin)与Pick1属于PDZ结构域(PSD-95/Dlg-/Zo-1 domain)蛋白,报道称能与ephrinB配体结合,但是否受Eph受体调控尚未见报道.以RAW264.7细胞株为研究对象,通过蛋白质印迹及/或免疫荧光分析显示RAW264.7细胞经RANKL诱导的破骨细胞表达ephrinB2、内居蛋白(syntenin)和Pick1三个蛋白质.将提前成簇的可溶性EphB4蛋白加入培养液,与ephrinB2配体结合,用来研究EphB4/ephrinB2逆向信号对syntenin和Pick1表达水平变化的影响.免疫印迹及Real-time RT-PCR分析结果显示,在EphB4-Fc实验组中Pick1的蛋白质及mRNA水平都有明显增加,然而在EphB4-Fc实验组与Fc对照组别间syntenin的蛋白质及mRNA水平未见明显变化.免疫共沉淀结果显示,syntenin和Pick1不能与ephrinB2共沉淀.以上结果初步探索了体外破骨细胞分化过程中,EphB4/ephrinB2逆向信号对PDZ结构域蛋白(ephrinB2配体潜在的下游信号分子)表达变化的调控.     

Bone cell interactions through Eph/ephrin

Bones cannot properly form or be maintained without cell-cell interactions through ephrin ligands and Eph receptors. Cell culture analysis and evaluation of genetic mouse models and human diseases reveal various ephrins and Eph functions in the skeletal system. Migration, attachment and spreading of mesenchymal stem cells are regulated by ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors. ephrinB1 loss-of-function is associated with craniofrontonasal syndrome (CFNS) in humans and mice. In bone remodeling, ephrinB2 is postulated to act as a “coupling stimulator.” In that case, bidirectional signaling between osteoclastic ephrinB2 and osteoblastic EphB4 suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption and enhances osteoblastic bone formation, facilitating the transition between these two states. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) induces ephrinB2 in osteoblasts and enhances osteoblastic bone formation. In contrast to ephrinB2, ephrinA2 acts as a “coupling inhibitor,” since ephrinA2 reverse signaling into osteoclasts enhances osteoclastogenesis and EphA2 forward signaling into osteoblasts suppresses osteoblastic bone formation and mineralization. Furthermore, ephrins and Ephs likely modulate pathological conditions such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple myeloma and osteosarcoma. This review focuses on ephrin/Eph-mediated cell-cell interactions in bone biology.     

Bone cell interactions through Eph/ephrin: Bone modeling,remodeling and associated diseases

Bones cannot properly form or be maintained without cell-cell interactions through ephrin ligands and Eph receptors. Cell culture analysis and evaluation of genetic mouse models and human diseases reveal various ephrins and Eph functions in the skeletal system. Migration, attachment and spreading of mesenchymal stem cells are regulated by ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors. ephrinB1 loss-of-function is associated with craniofrontonasal syndrome (CFNS) in humans and mice. In bone remodeling, ephrinB2 is postulated to act as a “coupling stimulator.” In that case, bidirectional signaling between osteoclastic ephrinB2 and osteoblastic EphB4 suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption and enhances osteoblastic bone formation, facilitating the transition between these two states. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) induces ephrinB2 in osteoblasts and enhances osteoblastic bone formation. In contrast to ephrinB2, ephrinA2 acts as a “coupling inhibitor,” since ephrinA2 reverse signaling into osteoclasts enhances osteoclastogenesis and EphA2 forward signaling into osteoblasts suppresses osteoblastic bone formation and mineralization. Furthermore, ephrins and Ephs likely modulate pathological conditions such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple myeloma and osteosarcoma. This review focuses on ephrin/Eph-mediated cell-cell interactions in bone biology.     

Maintenance of Bone Homeostasis by DLL1‐Mediated Notch Signaling

Adult bone mass is maintained through a balance of the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Although Notch signaling has been shown to maintain bone homeostasis by controlling the commitment, differentiation, and function of cells in both the osteoblast and osteoclast lineages, the precise mechanisms by which Notch performs such diverse and complex roles in bone physiology remain unclear. By using a transgenic approach that modified the expression of delta‐like 1 (DLL1) or Jagged1 (JAG1) in an osteoblast‐specific manner, we investigated the ligand‐specific effects of Notch signaling in bone homeostasis. This study demonstrated for the first time that the proper regulation of DLL1 expression, but not JAG1 expression, in osteoblasts is essential for the maintenance of bone remodeling. DLL1‐induced Notch signaling was responsible for the expansion of the bone‐forming cell pool by promoting the proliferation of committed but immature osteoblasts. However, DLL1‐Notch signaling inhibited further differentiation of the expanded osteoblasts to become fully matured functional osteoblasts, thereby substantially decreasing bone formation. Osteoblast‐specific expression of DLL1 did not alter the intrinsic differentiation ability of cells of the osteoclast lineage. However, maturational arrest of osteoblasts caused by the DLL1 transgene impaired the maturation and function of osteoclasts due to a failed osteoblast‐osteoclast coupling, resulting in severe suppression of bone metabolic turnover. Taken together, DLL1‐mediated Notch signaling is critical for proper bone remodeling as it regulates the differentiation and function of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Our study elucidates the importance of ligand‐specific activation of Notch signaling in the maintenance of bone homeostasis. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 2569–2580, 2017. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.     

Targeted disruption of ephrin B1 in cells of myeloid lineage increases osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in mice

Disruption of ephrin B1 in collagen I producing cells in mice results in severe skull defects and reduced bone formation. Because ephrin B1 is also expressed during osteoclast differentiation and because little is known on the role of ephrin B1 reverse signaling in bone resorption, we examined the bone phenotypes in ephrin B1 conditional knockout mice, and studied the function of ephrin B1 reverse signaling on osteoclast differentiation and resorptive activity. Targeted deletion of ephrin B1 gene in myeloid lineage cells resulted in reduced trabecular bone volume, trabecular number and trabecular thickness caused by increased TRAP positive osteoclasts and bone resorption. Histomorphometric analyses found bone formation parameters were not changed in ephrin B1 knockout mice. Treatment of wild-type precursors with clustered soluble EphB2-Fc inhibited RANKL induced formation of multinucleated osteoclasts, and bone resorption pits. The same treatment of ephrin B1 deficient precursors had little effect on osteoclast differentiation and pit formation. Similarly, activation of ephrin B1 reverse signaling by EphB2-Fc treatment led to inhibition of TRAP, cathepsin K and NFATc1 mRNA expression in osteoclasts derived from wild-type mice but not conditional knockout mice. Immunoprecipitation with NHERF1 antibody revealed ephrin B1 interacted with NHERF1 in differentiated osteoclasts. Treatment of osteoclasts with exogenous EphB2-Fc resulted in reduced phosphorylation of ezrin/radixin/moesin. We conclude that myeloid lineage produced ephrin B1 is a negative regulator of bone resorption in vivo, and that activation of ephrin B1 reverse signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation in vitro in part via a mechanism that involves inhibition of NFATc1 expression and modulation of phosphorylation status of ezrin/radixin/moesin.     

The molecular scaffold Gab2 is a crucial component of RANK signaling and osteoclastogenesis

Morphogenesis and remodeling of bone involve synthesis of bone matrix by osteoblasts and coordinate resorption of bone by osteoclasts. Defective bone remodeling caused by altered osteoclast activity underlies a multitude of osteopenic disorders. Receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK) and its ligand RANKL have been identified as essential factors involved in osteoclast development and bone remodeling, but their mechanism and interacting factors have not been fully characterized. Here we report that the molecular adapter Grb-2-associated binder-2 (Gab2) associates with RANK and mediates RANK-induced activation of NF-kappaB, Akt and Jnk. Inactivation of the gene encoding Gab2 in mice results in osteopetrosis and decreased bone resorption as a result of defective osteoclast differentiation. We also show that Gab2 has a crucial role in the differentiation of human progenitor cells into osteoclasts. We have thus identified a new, key regulatory scaffold molecule, Gab2, that controls select RANK signaling pathways and is essential for osteoclastogenesis and bone homeostasis.     

Bone morphogenic protein 2 directly enhances differentiation of murine osteoclast precursors

Previous studies found that bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) support osteoclast formation, but it is not clear whether this is a direct effect on osteoclasts or mediated indirectly through osteoblasts. We have shown that a mouse deficient for the BMP antagonist Twisted gastrulation suggested a direct positive role for BMPs on osteoclastogenesis. In this report, we further determine the significance of BMP signaling on osteoclast formation in vitro. We find that BMP2 synergizes with suboptimal levels of receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL) to enhance in vitro differentiation of osteoclast‐like cells. The enhancement by BMP2 is not a result of changes in the rate of proliferation or survival of the bone marrow‐derived cultures, but is accompanied by an increase in expression of genes involved in osteoclast differentiation and fusion. Treatment with BMP2 did not significantly alter expression of RANKL or OPG in our osteoclast cultures, suggesting that the enhancement of osteoclastogenesis is not mediated indirectly through osteoblasts or stromal cells. Consistent with this, we detected phosphorylated SMAD1,5,8 (p‐SMAD) in the nuclei of mononuclear and multinucleated cells in osteoclast cultures. Levels of p‐SMAD, BMP2, and BMP receptors increased during differentiation. RNAi suppression of Type II BMP receptor inhibited RANKL‐stimulated formation of multinuclear TRAP‐positive cells. The BMP antagonist noggin inhibited RANKL‐mediated osteoclast differentiation when added prior to day 3, while addition of noggin on day 3 or later failed to inhibit their differentiation. Taken together, these data indicate that osteoclasts express BMP2 and BMP receptors, and that autocrine BMP signaling directly promotes the differentiation of osteoclasts‐like cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 672–682, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Osteoclast bone resorption is enhanced in the presence of osteoblasts

Bone resorption activity by osteoclasts has been evaluated in a co-culture system in which osteoclasts have been plated in the presence of osteoblasts. The system prevents cell-cell contact but permits diffusion of molecules through the pores of a millipore membrane that separates the two compartments in which the two cell types have been plated. Results demonstrated that osteoblasts exert a stimulatory effect over osteoclast bone resorption due to soluble molecules capable of passing through the membrane pores. The effect is specific since periosteal cells, which do not express osteoblastic characteristics, fail to induce changes in the osteoclast activity. PTH does not affect osteoblast-mediated enhancement of bone resorption, indicating that the stimulatory effect that the hormone exert in vivo occurs via a different cellular system.     

EphB4 promotes site-specific metastatic tumor cell dissemination by interacting with endothelial cell-expressed ephrinB2

The tyrosine kinase receptor EphB4 interacts with its ephrinB2 ligand to act as a bidirectional signaling system that mediates adhesion, migration, and guidance by controlling attractive and repulsive activities. Recent findings have shown that hematopoietic cells expressing EphB4 exert adhesive functions towards endothelial cells expressing ephrinB2. We therefore hypothesized that EphB4/ephrinB2 interactions may be involved in the preferential adhesion of EphB4-expressing tumor cells to ephrinB2-expressing endothelial cells. Screening of a panel of human tumor cell lines identified EphB4 expression in nearly all analyzed tumor cell lines. Human A375 melanoma cells engineered to express either full-length EphB4 or truncated EphB4 variants which lack the cytoplasmic catalytic domain (ΔC-EphB4) adhered preferentially to ephrinB2-expressing endothelial cells. Force spectroscopy by atomic force microscopy confirmed, on the single cell level, the rapid and direct adhesive interaction between EphB4 and ephrinB2. Tumor cell trafficking experiments in vivo using sensitive luciferase detection techniques revealed significantly more EphB4-expressing A375 cells but not ΔC-EphB4-expressing or mock-transduced control cells in the lungs, the liver, and the kidneys. Correspondingly, ephrinB2 expression was detected in the microvessels of these organs. The specificity of the EphB4-mediated tumor homing phenotype was validated by blocking the EphB4/ephrinB2 interaction with soluble EphB4-Fc. Taken together, these experiments identify adhesive EphB4/ephrinB2 interactions between tumor cells and endothelial cells as a mechanism for the site-specific metastatic dissemination of tumor cells. AACR.     

EphB receptors and ephrinB ligands: regulators of vascular assembly and homeostasis

Eph receptors comprise the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases consisting of eight EphA receptors (with five corresponding glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol-anchored ephrinA ligands) and six EphB receptors (with three corresponding transmembrane ephrinB ligands). Originally identified as neuronal pathfinding molecules, genetic loss of function experiments have identified EphB receptors and ephrinB ligands as crucial regulators of vascular assembly, orchestrating arteriovenous differentiation and boundary formation. Despite these clearly defined rate-limiting roles of the EphB/ephrinB system for developmental angiogenesis, the mechanisms of the functions of EphB receptors and ephrinB ligands in the cells of the vascular system are poorly understood. Moreover, little evidence can be found in the recent literature regarding complementary EphB and ephrinB expression patterns that occur in the vascular system and that may bring cells into juxtapositional contact to allow bi-directional signaling between neighboring cells. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the role of EphB receptors and ephrinB ligands during embryonic vascular assembly and discusses recent findings on EphB/ephrinB-mediated cellular functions pointing to the crucial role of the Eph/ephrin system in controlling vascular homeostasis in the adult.Eph/ephrin work in the laboratory of the authors is supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Au83/3–2 within the SPP1069 "Angiogenesis")     

EphB4 Forward‐Signaling Regulates Cardiac Progenitor Development in Mouse ES Cells

Eph receptor (Eph)‐ephrin signaling plays an important role in organ development and tissue regeneration. Bidirectional signaling of EphB4–ephrinB2 regulates cardiovascular development. To assess the role of EphB4–ephrinB2 signaling in cardiac lineage development, we utilized two GFP reporter systems in embryonic stem (ES) cells, in which the GFP transgenes were expressed in Nkx2.5⁺ cardiac progenitor cells and in α‐MHC⁺ cardiomyocytes, respectively. We found that both EphB4 and ephrinB2 were expressed in Nkx2.5‐GFP⁺ cardiac progenitor cells, but not in α‐MHC‐GFP⁺ cardiomyocytes during cardiac lineage differentiation of ES cells. An antagonist of EphB4, TNYL‐RAW peptides, that block the binding of EphB4 and ephrinB2, impaired cardiac lineage development in ES cells. Inhibition of EphB4–ephrinB2 signaling at different time points during ES cell differentiation demonstrated that the interaction of EphB4 and ephrinB2 was required for the early stage of cardiac lineage development. Forced expression of human full‐length EphB4 or intracellular domain‐truncated EphB4 in EphB4‐null ES cells was established to investigate the role of EphB4‐forward signaling in ES cells. Interestingly, while full‐length EphB4 was able to restore the cardiac lineage development in EphB4‐null ES cells, the truncated EphB4 that lacks the intracellular domain of tyrosine kinase and PDZ motif failed to rescue the defect of cardiomyocyte development, suggesting that EphB4 intracellular domain is essential for the development of cardiomyocytes. Our study provides evidence that receptor‐kinase‐dependent EphB4‐forward signaling plays a crucial role in the development of cardiac progenitor cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 116: 467–475, 2015. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation

Matrix-producing osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts maintain bone homeostasis. Osteoclasts are multinucleated, giant cells of hematopoietic origin formed by the fusion of mononuclear pre-osteoclasts derived from myeloid cells. Fusion-mediated giant cell formation is critical for osteoclast maturation; without it, bone resorption is inefficient. To understand how osteoclasts differ from other myeloid lineage cells, we previously compared global mRNA expression patterns in these cells and identified genes of unknown function predominantly expressed in osteoclasts, one of which is the d2 isoform of vacuolar (H(+)) ATPase (v-ATPase) V(0) domain (Atp6v0d2). Here we show that inactivation of Atp6v0d2 in mice results in markedly increased bone mass due to defective osteoclasts and enhanced bone formation. Atp6v0d2 deficiency did not affect differentiation or the v-ATPase activity of osteoclasts. Rather, Atp6v0d2 was required for efficient pre-osteoclast fusion. Increased bone formation was probably due to osteoblast-extrinsic factors, as Atp6v02 was not expressed in osteoblasts and their differentiation ex vivo was not altered in the absence of Atp6v02. Our results identify Atp6v0d2 as a regulator of osteoclast fusion and bone formation, and provide genetic data showing that it is possible to simultaneously inhibit osteoclast maturation and stimulate bone formation by therapeutically targeting the function of a single gene.     

Proteome analysis of secreted proteins during osteoclast differentiation using two different methods: two-dimensional electrophoresis and isotope-coded affinity tags analysis with two-dimensional chromatography

Bone is maintained by two cell types, bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Osteoblasts express two factors, osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL), inhibiting and promoting osteoclast differentiation, respectively. In contrast, modulators of bone resorption expressed by osteoclasts have not been so well studied enough. In the present study, we demonstrate proteome analysis of secreted proteins during osteoclast differentiation to elucidate the molecular mechanism of bone resorption and bone remodeling. To achieve this objective, we chose RAW264.7 cells with RANKL as a homogeneous osteoclast differentiation model and used two methods, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) analysis with two-dimensional liquid chromatography. We found 23 spots in 2-DE and 19 proteins in ICAT analysis which were expressed differently during osteoclast differentiation. These two methods gave us closely related but different information about proteins, suggesting they are complementary or at least supplementary methods at present. Cathepsins, osteopontin, legumain, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, and other proteins were observed as up- or down-regulated proteins and are discussed in the context of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. In addition to confirming previous observations, this study indicates novel proteins related to osteoclast differentiation which are potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis.     

Kruppel-like factor 4 attenuates osteoblast formation,function, and cross talk with osteoclasts

Osteoblasts not only control bone formation but also support osteoclast differentiation. Here we show the involvement of Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in the differentiation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. KLF4 was down-regulated by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25(OH)₂D₃) in osteoblasts. Overexpression of KLF4 in osteoblasts attenuated 1,25(OH)₂D₃-induced osteoclast differentiation in co-culture of mouse bone marrow cells and osteoblasts through the down-regulation of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) expression. Direct binding of KLF4 to the RANKL promoter repressed 1,25(OH)₂D₃-induced RANKL expression by preventing vitamin D receptor from binding to the RANKL promoter region. In contrast, ectopic overexpression of KLF4 in osteoblasts attenuated osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. KLF4 interacted directly with Runx2 and inhibited the expression of its target genes. Moreover, mice with conditional knockout of KLF4 in osteoblasts showed markedly increased bone mass caused by enhanced bone formation despite increased osteoclast activity. Thus, our data suggest that KLF4 controls bone homeostasis by negatively regulating both osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation.     

A new member of tumor necrosis factor ligand family, ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL, regulates osteoclast differentiation and function

Osteoclasts, the multinucleated giant cells that resorb bone, develop from monocyte-macrophage lineage cells. Osteoblasts or bone marrow stromal cells have been suggested to be involved in osteoclastic bone resorption. The recent discovery of new members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-ligand family has elucidated the precise mechanism by which osteoblasts/stromal cells regulate osteoclast differentiation and function. Osteoblasts/stromal cells express a new member of the TNF-ligand family "osteoclast differentiation factor(ODF)/osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL)/TNF-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE)/receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL)" as a membrane associated factor. Osteoclast precursors which possess RANK, a TNF receptor family member, recognize ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL through cell-to-cell interaction with osteoblasts/stromal cells, and differentiate into osteoclasts in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Mature osteoclasts also express RANK, and their bone-resorbingactivity is also induced by ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL which osteoblasts/stromal cells possess. Osteoprotegerin (OPG)/osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF)/TNF receptor-like molecule 1 (TR1) is a soluble decoy receptor for ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL. Activation of NF-kB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase through the RANK-mediated signaling system appears to be involved in differentiation and activation of osteoclasts.